Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Mozilla Labs Presents Seabird Concept Phone

Soulskill posted more than 3 years ago | from the does-it-print-money dept.

Cellphones 61

Several readers tipped news of a presentation on the Mozilla Labs blog about what they call Seabird, "a community-driven mobile phone concept." It's an imagining of what future phone tech could look like, using dual pico projectors and a Bluetooth/IR dongle to more easily interact with apps and web interfaces. "With mobile phone companies such as Samsung, LG and Motorola moving towards display applications for projectors, the technology remains open for expanding user interaction and input at the same time. The Seabird, on just a flat surface, enables netbook-quality interaction by working with the projector’s angular distortion to deliver interface, rather than content. With the benefit of a dock, each projector works independently and delivers laptop levels of efficiency."

cancel ×

61 comments

How much are the bulbs? (1)

jhoegl (638955) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687574)

Projector bulbs cost $250+, I would hate to see the bill on these cel phones.

Re:How much are the bulbs? (4, Informative)

Sonny Yatsen (603655) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687640)

LED lamps for pico projectors are much smaller and cheaper (especially for projectors that only need a throw distance of about 4 inches like in this concept) than projector lamps.

Re:How much are the bulbs? (1)

MozeeToby (1163751) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687724)

I was going to respond similarly, but I assumed (hoped?) that I was just suffering from a case of sarcasm-doesn't-translate-over-the-internet-syndrome and decided to give him the benefit of the doubt. Knowing my luck when it comes to these things I was probably wrong and he was dead serious.

Re:How much are the bulbs? (1)

nschubach (922175) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687658)

Pico Projectors cost ~$200 or less...

Only a concept, will not be made (4, Insightful)

Sonny Yatsen (603655) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687610)

You see dozens of concept phones and they're always cool or super-capable in some way. But it's easy to create a cool concept when you don't have to consider real world limitations like battery life, cost, size limitations, etc. This phone concept is no different. It is packed with every phone fantasy the Mozilla community had. Of course it's going to be cool. But it's also telling that the Mozilla Labs people also have no intent for actually making one.

Re:Only a concept, will not be made (1, Informative)

nschubach (922175) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687666)

FTA:

Does Mozilla have plans to produce a mobile phone?

No. Mozilla produces Firefox for Mobile, the popular Firefox browser for mobile phone systems such as Nokia Maemo and Android. You can find out more about Mozilla Firefox for Mobile here.

Re:Only a concept, will not be made (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33690468)

Where is "here"? Slashdot? Missing link? (But I repeat myself...)

Re:Only a concept, will not be made (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33687968)

Mozilla doesn't even have a credible answer to the WebKit juggernaut. They're skipping ahead 5 steps and now posting about hardware concepts.

It's embarrassing, really.

Re:Only a concept, will not be made (4, Insightful)

JustinOpinion (1246824) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688088)

Yes, it's only a concept phone, and Mozilla has no plans to make it. Yes, it's easy to make technology super-awesome when you only have to deal in concepts, and not engineering.

But are you implying that this makes concept designs useless? Personally, I love them. The point is to show all the many-splendid things that could be possible if more advanced technology were available. Which makes sense to do, since technology continually advances. A concept design does many things: it gets people excited about possibilities, it gives product designers/engineers ideas about what to try next. Perhaps most importantly, it lets us all ruminate about, and discuss, design choices long before major effort has been expended. This lets us pick out great ideas and shoot down bad ones.

For instance, I'm sure many Slashdotters had moments of "that will never work because of X" or "that would suck because of Y" while watching the video. These criticisms can be helpful, as a concept design is refined to bring it closer to what a real-world device would have to do. And conversely many of us I'm sure had ideas like "That's awesome! If it could that, I bet I could hack it to do Z!" Many things we now use, and take for granted (touchscreen mobile phones among them) were ridiculous concept-designs at one time.

All I'm saying is that rather than just being "this is not and never will be a real device... lame" we should be discussing what is right or wrong about this particular design. We should be dreaming about future technology... because we are part of the process of making that technology come to be!

Re:Only a concept, will not be made (3, Insightful)

MozeeToby (1163751) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688142)

Well, it's like Google rolling out Gigabit broadband. They know that it's not going to work right now, the technology isn't there yet to do it in a way that is profitable. But they are very curious about how people will respond to such an offer, how they use a net connection with such high download speeds, and what kinds of web services they can plan to bring to bear when the technology does make it cost effective.

Similarly, this is the direction that the Mozilla team thinks that mobile phone technology is going (I'll leave the argument about whether they are right and wrong for another post). So, if the phone of the future has multiple projectors, head tracking, in air gestures, multitouch, voice activation, keyboard and mouse integration, etc... what kinds of products and services make sense on such a device? How do those new technologies change the way people use their phones, and how can software writers capitalize on them?

Re:Only a concept, will not be made (2, Informative)

ion.simon.c (1183967) | more than 3 years ago | (#33693738)

Well, it's like Google rolling out Gigabit broadband. They know that it's not going to work right now, the technology isn't there yet to do it in a way that is profitable.

This is in Tennessee:
http://chattanoogagig.com/ [chattanoogagig.com]

1gbps symmetric service for 350USD/month.
Split that with ten neighbors, and you almost beat the download speed (and absolutely crush the upload speed) of Comcast's best offering for far less than half their price.

Re:Only a concept, will not be made (1)

EkriirkE (1075937) | more than 3 years ago | (#33689838)

I tried to see what the phone looked like, but there was too much sunburst and lens flare to see the renders :(

So this projector keyboard thing... (3, Insightful)

not already in use (972294) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687648)

It's always funny when you see future technologies that are doomed for failure. The projected keyboard has to be one of the most obviously useless features continually perpetuated as something that we will eventually have. I can only imagine how difficult and frustrating it would be to try and use one.

Re:So this projector keyboard thing... (2, Interesting)

Sonny Yatsen (603655) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687662)

I think Thinkgeek sold a laser projected keyboard at one point (or maybe they still do). I think the common complaint is that there is zero tactile response (since you're essentially tapping on a bit of tabletop) and the key press detection isn't very good.

Re:So this projector keyboard thing... (1, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33687838)

Not to mention that your fingers would constantly be blocking the projection, making it very difficult for anyone that needs to look at the keyboard.

Re:So this projector keyboard thing... (1)

EdZ (755139) | more than 3 years ago | (#33689062)

With the corollary that, because there is no tactile response at all to allow you to position your fingers over keys, you're going to be looking at it. A lot.

Re:So this projector keyboard thing... (1)

Agent0013 (828350) | more than 3 years ago | (#33690368)

Right, because my fingers don't block my view of a physical keyboard! Sure it lack the tactile feel of the buttons pressing, but so does the iPhone virtual keyboard. The iPhone virtual keyboard is is also obscured by the light blocking fingers. This is similar to that, but larger.

Re:So this projector keyboard thing... (1)

mark72005 (1233572) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688642)

This is something that is common to touchscreen phones - no tactile response- and there is a lot of typing going on with those devices these days.

The primary limitation as I see it is the issue of poor keypress detection. iOS I know attempts to mitigate this by auto-correcting your spelling, but the spelling correction isn't perfect either.

The true solution is to increase the size of the area you're working in. If the projected keyboard is big enough and the keypress detection works, great. But then you run into limits that increasing the work area brings, and you get the user further from the screen which makes things harder to see.

Re:So this projector keyboard thing... (1)

Joe Tie. (567096) | more than 3 years ago | (#33692884)

The keypress detection issue was really driven home for me when I bought one of those cheapo $90 Chinese android tablets. It's a surprisingly usable device. But the sensitivity for keypresses is pretty bad. It's all but impossible to type with it using my hands as a result. I have to use a stylus or my fingernail.

Re:So this projector keyboard thing... (2, Informative)

Pojut (1027544) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687674)

You mean like this [thinkgeek.com] crazy contraption?

Re:So this projector keyboard thing... (1)

Skuld-Chan (302449) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687834)

Still kinda useless for a mobile phone - I have one of those, its really only useful when your sitting at a desk with a flat surface.

Re:So this projector keyboard thing... (1)

bill_mcgonigle (4333) | more than 3 years ago | (#33689524)

Yeah, it's just if you're at a desk (or a tray table) you don't have to have lugged a keyboard with you - I used one with my Treo 650 for a little while - it was a bigger slow keyboard to Treo's small slow keyboard. It looks like ThinkGeek isn't carrying them anymore; if somebody really needs one drop me a line, I'll part with mine for the first hundred bucks.

Delivering interface, rather than content (2, Funny)

noidentity (188756) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687696)

The Seabird, on just a flat surface, enables netbook-quality interaction by working with the projector's angular distortion to deliver interface, rather than content.

<slowly steps back and avoids eye contact>

Re:Delivering interface, rather than content (1)

Arancaytar (966377) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688080)

That sentence sounds like...

*drumroll*

gullshit.

When can we get the hardware & software separa (3, Interesting)

KarlIsNotMyName (1529477) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687808)

So with these things becoming more like tiny computers than cell phones, what will it take for us to be able to buy just the hardware and install the rest ourselves?

Re:When can we get the hardware & software sep (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33688118)

Yeah, I was hoping this would be something like "Mozilla has an idea for an open phone platform based on a flexible UMPC". Even Android is locked down by the carriers or whoever.

But no, it's, "Mozilla has a crazy-ass idea for projector phones".

I don't want new technology in phones, I just want the existing stuff to become open so *I* can use it instead of having the manufacturer use it on my behalf.

Re:When can we get the hardware & software sep (1)

Warbothong (905464) | more than 3 years ago | (#33690442)

Yeah, I was hoping this would be something like "Mozilla has an idea for an open phone platform based on a flexible UMPC". Even Android is locked down by the carriers or whoever.

But no, it's, "Mozilla has a crazy-ass idea for projector phones".

I don't want new technology in phones, I just want the existing stuff to become open so *I* can use it instead of having the manufacturer use it on my behalf.

Android isn't locked down by mobile carriers. At least, the Android installation on my OpenMoko isn't. Neither is the Debian+Qtopia system I've got on the microSD. Or were you talking about some other open phone platform?

Re:When can we get the hardware & software sep (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33690930)

Unfortunately, the OpenMoko/Freerunner is the only example of an open phone. The soap-bar design, with inset resistive display is not really useful for a touch phone. And it uses an old armv4t processor. And they no longer make it.

Re:When can we get the hardware & software sep (2, Interesting)

mark72005 (1233572) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688666)

I'm looking forward to the day these devices can plug into my television, home theatre, and use my wireless keyboard by bluetooth - replacing a computer, gaming console, cable box, etc.

Re:When can we get the hardware & software sep (1)

M3lf.cz (983459) | more than 3 years ago | (#33689190)

Well, the Nokia N900 has TV out a supports Bluetooth HID devices (keyboards, some game controllers, etc.).

Re:When can we get the hardware & software sep (1)

Lennie (16154) | more than 3 years ago | (#33689344)

I have such a device, but the TV-out doesn't cut it. It is an s-video connector and it doesn't have a lot of resolution.

I think I've seen wireless connections for projectors.

I want one for my TV, maybe that would work.

Re:When can we get the hardware & software sep (1)

BitZtream (692029) | more than 3 years ago | (#33689132)

That'll happen right after you stop carriers from having control over what uses their network ...

In the US, thats going to require an act of congress cause the carriers aren't going to give up control on their own and will fight it and make it work as poorly as possible.

Have you seen the CableCard mess?

Re:When can we get the hardware & software sep (1)

DerekLyons (302214) | more than 3 years ago | (#33689232)

So with these things becoming more like tiny computers than cell phones

It's already there. A month ago my wife and I took our RV on a long weekend trip, and consciously left the laptop* behind - taking only our iPhones. Facebook, LiveJournal, Flickr, Google Maps, an interface to Geocaching.com, weather... Pretty much everything we'd need or want while traveling was available 24/7 in the palm of our hands. The only capability I missed was the ability to download and review photographs from my camera. She missed nothing at all.
 
In fact, since her laptop is on it's last legs, we're talking just recycling it and not replacing it all. On the few occasions she wants/needs a larger screen, she just uses my gaming rig.

*The laptop is hers, I use two desktops, one for gaming purchased when my 'office' machine could no longer provide sufficient performance.

what do projectors have to do with community? (2, Interesting)

F34nor (321515) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687852)

A phone that could route calls through it peers seems far more community driven than some new interface. I want to be able to call someone 10 feet away without a tower, I want tol be able tol reach a tower by routing through my neighbor or his femtocell, I want an idle cell that can see a network to be a tower. Oh yeah and I want people to know that if you buy your own hardware at&t can't disable the good shit.

Re:what do projectors have to do with community? (1)

Sonny Yatsen (603655) | more than 3 years ago | (#33687868)

They mean community driven as in the Mozilla community contributed ideas for the phone.

Re:what do projectors have to do with community? (1)

zrbyte (1666979) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688078)

"I want to be able to call someone 10 feet away without a tower"

Actually some there are projects which aim to do just that, like Serval. [servalproject.org]

Re:what do projectors have to do with community? (1)

F34nor (321515) | more than 3 years ago | (#33693454)

You win the "only meaningful response" prize! Awesome.

Re:what do projectors have to do with community? (1)

Ukab the Great (87152) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688206)

The Blackbean Wind [wikipedia.org] is the you're looking for. And there's no chance of AT&T disabling the good shit. I wouldn't put it past Verizon, though.

Re:what do projectors have to do with community? (1)

F34nor (321515) | more than 3 years ago | (#33693274)

Uhhhhh...(while grinding skull against pavement in insane rage) WTF are you taking about?

Can you tether with an iPhone?
No.
Can I tether with an unlocked phone Nokia e71, n97, or e61?
Yes.
Can you choose the network on an e71x?
No.
Can I choose the network on an e71?
Yes.

So in fact, the chance of AT&T disabling the good shit is 100%.
And on a side note, this
http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile/terranet-creates-peer-to-peer-cellphone-network-20070912/ [geek.com]
is what I am looking for.

Re:what do projectors have to do with community? (1)

jdoverholt (1229898) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688506)

Depending on your situation, some of the 802.11g phones are pretty good and avoid all the hassle of carrier restrictions. They work at work and at home, where else do you ever go? My campus is working with the city right now to roll out WAPs on telephone poles in the vicinity, extending our wifi fabric out into the nearby streets. With WiMax coming out, this is looking like a practical alternative to cell providers in the near future.

Examples: Cisco WIP310 [cisco.com] , Linksys by Cisco WIP330 [amazon.com] , D-Link DPH-541 [dlink.com] , Alfa Color wireless VoIP [amazon.com] (Sorry for the Amazon links, couldn't find some manufacturer pages quickly)

Re:what do projectors have to do with community? (1)

BitZtream (692029) | more than 3 years ago | (#33689144)

I want to be able to call someone 10 feet away without a tower

You can, its called talking, people do it every day. You don't even need a phone.

Re:what do projectors have to do with community? (1)

F34nor (321515) | more than 3 years ago | (#33693292)

That's funny because I often call people who are operating in the cab of a piece of heavy equipment to tell them what to do. Don't be an apple fan boy or try to be a smart ass and come off a dumb ass by assuming that because you don't have a use for something no one else will!

Re:what do projectors have to do with community? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#33696636)

They do make walkie-talkies for these special cases...

Re:what do projectors have to do with community? (1)

Sarten-X (1102295) | more than 3 years ago | (#33704076)

They also make calculators, small calendars, address books, dictionaries, and alarm clocks, but I don't like having 15 items in my pocket.

Re:what do projectors have to do with community? (1)

F34nor (321515) | more than 3 years ago | (#33706676)

What the fuck is wrong with these people? Could they be paid shills or are they really arguing in favor of mediocrity?

Re:what do projectors have to do with community? (1)

schnell (163007) | more than 3 years ago | (#33691320)

I want to be able to call someone 10 feet away without a tower

You want one of these [wikipedia.org] then, not a cellphone.

I want to be able to reach a tower by routing through my neighbor

Making cell phones that are also cell repeaters is very simple as long as you don't mind huge phones that output enough power to toast your bagel while you're waiting.

or his femtocell

If your neighbor sets you up on his femtocell, you can do that already. There's a reason femtocells aren't open by default to any user...

Oh yeah and I want people to know that if you buy your own hardware at&t can't disable the good shit.

As long as you aren't expecting cellular carriers to subsidize the cost of your equipment for you, there's no reason they would disable anything on a handset.

Seriously, there's a reason that "concept phones" like this bug me, which is that some people take away the lesson that there's all these awesome features phones could have if only the evil cellphone manufacturers and carriers weren't standing in the way. All these things are doable - it's just that they all have tradeoffs in size, cost and complexity that 99.99% of customers wouldn't buy, and hence nobody will build them. Maybe OpenMoko ... but the success of that kinda speaks for itself.

Re:what do projectors have to do with community? (1)

F34nor (321515) | more than 3 years ago | (#33693404)

"You want one of these then, not a cellphone."
  I don't want to needlessly carry multiple devices. I might want to talk about confidential things. I might want to use my Jawbone that is already in my ear. I don't think "why would you want to do it that way" is a interesting question relating to the abilities devices when they are only limited by software.

"Making cell phones that are also cell repeaters is very simple as long as you don't mind huge phones that output enough power to toast your bagel while you're waiting."
  Not all the time, how about just when needed? E.g. Ack(help I have no tower!)Sed(I can see you, I can see the tower, are you sure you can't see the tower?)Ack(help me random phone, you are my only hope!)Also the broadcasting and receiving device in a wireless system HAVE to be able to see each other, this is why 250mw on a DD-WRT WRT54G can cause problems, the computer can see the router but the router can't see the computer. Towers can see mobile phone's broadcasts; believe it or not.

"As long as you aren't expecting cellular carriers to subsidize the cost of your equipment for you..."
  I am not expecting shit from an oligopoly but somehow I get shitty coverage. I do buy my own equipment because I want to control my property not be someone's bitch for a trifling discount over the life of the device.

"...there's no reason they would disable anything on a handset."
  You would think so but you would be wrong. Take for instance the Nokia e71 vs. e71x. I have had both. The e71x WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO CHOOSE EDGE VS. 3G. This means when I am at home and have 1/2 a bar of 3G (just enough for the little fucker to keep trying) and 5 bars of EDGE I cannot use my phone. As a share holder in AT&T I sent them a very angry letter asking them why they spent my money to have a software engineer make a handset worse. I have not gotten a reply but I have heard a conference call where the investors asked similar question at an institutional investor level. I know why they do it to a certain extent e.g the Nokia e61x where they disabled the Wifi so prevent using VoIP over 802.11 instead of cellular circuit switched voice.

Why did you take time out of your life to post this apologist bullshit?

Pen-PC computing. (1)

Irick (1842362) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688188)

This reminds me of that horrible concept divice someone once tried to convence us we'd all be using by 2020. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40tS8A-SJ6c [youtube.com]

Mozilla seems to affection sea related (2, Funny)

youn (1516637) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688236)

seamonkey... seabird... I can't wait til they come up with a see-through product :)

OFFTOPIC 3D youtube video (1)

mapkinase (958129) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688242)

I am glad youtube gives options to videoposters to submit alternative formats for 3D video: I am tired of colored 3D domination that requires glasses (side-by-side stereo does not require glasses, though not everybody can seem them without glasses).

3D effect in that particular video sucks though.

Albatross! Albatross! (2, Funny)

adavies42 (746183) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688244)

Albatross! Albatross!
What flavor is it?
It hasn't got a flavor!
Everything's got a flavor!
It's bleeding seabird flavor!
Right, I'll take two.
Albatross! Albatross! Stormy petrel on a stick!

Why has it got mini-USB instead of micro-USB? (2, Insightful)

judgecorp (778838) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688382)

I don't want to quibble, and I know it does everything else you could want, but surely mini-USB is yesterday, and we should get with the excitement in data cable connections... :-) http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/mozilla-shows-seabird-concept-phone-10036 [eweekeurope.co.uk]

It's kinda funny for a "phone" (4, Insightful)

thewils (463314) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688510)

That nowhere in the concept video do we see someone actually talking on the thing.

Infringement (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33688544)

This clearly infringes on Chat Roulette's prior art concept: Seebird.

Thought of this ages ago. (1)

Nursie (632944) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688706)

In fact the idea of putting pico-projectors into a cell phone has been around for a few years. Pair them with a laser keyboard and you have a tiny computer than seems a lot bigger.

I hope nobody either got any patents or actual money out of this, because it's frickin' obvious given the technology.

Perhaps it's most telling (2, Interesting)

sv_libertarian (1317837) | more than 3 years ago | (#33688710)

That we are starting to move away from standalone devices for a single task. I read nearly all my email on my phone. By the time my laptop is booted up, I'm already partway through the night's email. The tiny keyboard is the limitation for me right now, I use my computer for anything requiring a reply of more than a few sentences. Meanwhile, my computer makes phone calls, my amateur radio sends data, my cell phone browses the web, I make a phone call with my handheld 2 meter radio, and on and on and on.

Personally, I'm thrilled to have a tiny computer in my pocket. And if I could somehow dock it, run it off of AC power, and connect a keyboard, mouse and larger display to it (and possibly external data storage) I wager a modern Android phone would handle nearly all of my communication. A good cellphone with a decent dock could be a very useful tool. The next ten years of mobile phone evolution excites me to no great end.

Heres an idea ... (-1, Flamebait)

BitZtream (692029) | more than 3 years ago | (#33689114)

Why don't they focus on making their browse not suck. Its rapidly replacing IE as a shitty browser to use. Chrome whips its ass unless you're an extension junky.

Sorry to piss in you firefox fanboy's cereal but Mozilla is just too disorganized and unfocused to continue to be relevant to the web.

Its turned into this silly group of guys who seem to do whatever the fuck they want and pretend someone cares other than themselves.

Mozilla Falcon (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33689552)

That's nothing. Here's an actual concept spacecraft that can travel FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT, to distant planets/solar systems, and carry cargo to boot! http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Millenium_Falcon Apparently it can make the Kessel Run in less than twelve parsecs!

(Oh, wait, no, anyone can make a pretty picture of something and call it a concept-whatever without it being physically, let alone technologically or economically possible.)

Fetish object (1)

bar-agent (698856) | more than 3 years ago | (#33691254)

The form development took its cues from various aerodynamic, avian and decidedly feminine forms. Its erect posture intends a sense of poise while its supine conformity to the hand reconciles that with the user's desire for digital control. The curvature of the back also serves a functional role in elevating the projector lens elements when lying flat.

Uh.

I gotta go take a cold shower now. BRB.

Here's my wishlist for a smartphone (1)

cowtamer (311087) | more than 3 years ago | (#33692168)

I wish someone would get the following right in ONE device:

A Speakerphone that works as well as a PolyCom device (never seen on a cell phone)
PHYSICAL ring/vibrate switch (Palm Pre had this)
Sunlight-readable display that doesn't disappear in the middle of the conversation
2.5 mm Headphone jack (Older phones had this -- no pairing, no HORRIBLE sound quality, no recharging, no worming stuff into your ears)
3.5 mm Stereo headphone jack (common, but never seen with the 2.5mm jack)
USB charger/data
Physical "mute" switch that disconnects the microphone (preferrably on a transparent section of the body where the internals are visible)
Physical keyboard
Android-like open OS with the ability to disable/enable individual components and re-install OS from an external source without having to break into anything
Support for both GSM and CDMA
Dual GSM cards (available on some European phones -- more useful than you can imagine)
Other bells/whistles if there's any room :)

I would like Mozilla to make that phone (1)

Eggbloke (1698408) | more than 3 years ago | (#33692868)

If they made that phone without all the silly concept stuff it would be awesome (8MP camera, big screen and speed (my phone is not half as responsive as the phone in the video)) as Mozilla would leave the Android completely open and continue to update it. Shame it can never happen. =(
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...