×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Light Could Make Paralyzed Limbs Move

samzenpus posted more than 3 years ago | from the walking-on-sunshine dept.

Biotech 63

Zothecula writes "In a study that could eventually restore movement to humans' paralyzed limbs, researchers at California's Stanford University have used light to induce muscle contractions in mice. A gene derived from algae was inserted into the mice, encoding a light-sensitive protein which adhered to their nerve cell surfaces. Scientists then placed an 'optical cuff' lined with tiny, inwards-facing LEDs around the mice's sciatic nerves. By penetrating those nerves with brief, high-intensity bursts of blue light, they were able to produce muscle contractions similar to those that would occur naturally. The technology is called 'optogenetics.'"

cancel ×
This is a preview of your comment

No Comment Title Entered

Anonymous Coward 1 minute ago

No Comment Entered

63 comments

another idea (-1, Redundant)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33742852)

shaved pussy makes my dick move, maybe it works for other body parts?

Got ED? (2, Funny)

DemonicMember (1557097) | more than 3 years ago | (#33742888)

How long until some uses this for erectile dysfunction? Lol

Re:Got ED? (1)

cappp (1822388) | more than 3 years ago | (#33742930)

Won't work. Erections are based on blood flowing into spongy erectile tissues allowing them to become engorged and causing stiffening and hopefully lengthening. This procedure allows muscular contraction, a completely different system.

Have a read of TFA, the really fascinating part isn't addressed in the summary at all. This light-based system replaces an electric-stimulation system, the development and reasons for shifting from one to the other makes for a pleasant read.

Re:Got ED? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33743000)

true, but consider -- light (laser) can be used for hair removal. Instead of using light to stimulate the penis, use laser to remove pussy hair. I mean, hairy beavers are turn off for most gents. It's not that they can't get it up, it's that they don't want to get it up.

Re:Got ED? (1)

cappp (1822388) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743014)

Depends on the chap really, some rather like a little grass on the pitch.

Re:Got ED? (1)

badkarmadayaccount (1346167) | more than 3 years ago | (#33764540)

Seconded. It's also really annoying when it's been shaved - and the leftover hairs grind on your nose. Though not being a problem for penetration - then again - I don't shave, so maybe that saved me some pain. Sorry for the OT post.

Re:Got ED? (1)

scapermoya (769847) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743060)

actually, it totally could work. erections occur because certain smooth muscle in the penis relaxes, allowing blood to flow in the right places. ED drugs block the degradation of a chemical that promotes this relaxation. a light gated receptor of the proper type (Gi) could be designed to do the same thing.

Re:Got ED? (1)

cappp (1822388) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743156)

Don't forget that the relaxation is only half the equation - there is still a need for massive dilation in the veins delivering blood and a restriction in those removing it.

How would this tech' be applied to relaxing muscles? I thought it was more complicated to stimulate relaxation than contraction, at least without the use of drugs.

Re:Got ED? (3, Informative)

scapermoya (769847) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743214)

1) veins don't deliver blood, arteries do

2) the relaxation I was referring to was of the smooth muscle in the walls of the arteries leading to the penis

3) there isn't much regulation of bloodflow that takes place on the venous side (ie venous drainage is relatively constant). thus if you increase flow inward it will necessarily lead to pooling (ie erection)

the classic ED drugs all work by relaxing the arteries that flow toward the penis by inhibiting PDE5, a phosphodiesterase predominantly found in penis arteries. this increases cAMP levels, leaving to vasodilation and an erection. unfortunately these drugs aren't perfectly specific, and cause small amount of vasodilation throughout the body, along with a corresponding drop in blood pressure. this is why they tell you not to take the ED pills if you take other vasodilators like nitroglycerin.

if you could engineer a Gs (i was wrong in my earlier post when I said Gi, you want more cAMP not less) receptor that was light sensitive, and get it to express only in the penis artery smooth muscle.... and shine light through your skin to activate these receptors, it would work the same way.

obviously not an ideal way to treat a disorder. these light gated channels are probably only good for basic scientific research.

Re:Got ED? (1)

cappp (1822388) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743276)

Huh, pretty interesting idea though - and certainly better than flooding the body with drugs. Bit of creative material use in luminous condoms combined could be well rewarded. Thanks for that post; it’s exactly the kind that keeps me coming back to Slashdot.

Re:Got ED? (1)

TamCaP (900777) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743652)

There is a perfectly functioning Gi receptor that is sensitive only to orally bioavailable designer drug called CNO - the receptor's name is hM4Di (also known under a sexy name of DREADD). Now lets talk delivery :D

Re:Got ED? (1)

Kilrah_il (1692978) | more than 3 years ago | (#33744392)

+1 Informative, but one small correction, The drug works by inhibiting the degradation of cGMP, not cAMP. More on that here [wikipedia.org].

Re:Got ED? (1)

scapermoya (769847) | more than 3 years ago | (#33747482)

woah, you're totally right. my professor screwed that one up. we were taught that PDE5 cleaves both cAMP and cGMP, but it looks like only PDE1, 2, and 3 cleave both.

the downstream effects would be almost identical though. both cAMP and cGMP cause myosin light chain kinase to be phosphorylated by their respective kinases (PKA and PKG), leading to lower myosin activity and thus relaxation.

nice catch!

Re:Got ED? (1)

Kilrah_il (1692978) | more than 3 years ago | (#33755836)

Yes, but cAMP has so many other functions that a drug affecting it would have many more side-effects - which is exactly why PDE5 was chosen as a drug target (for the original anti-pulmonary hypertension drug).

Re:Got ED? (1)

ooshna (1654125) | more than 3 years ago | (#33745706)

I don't think this would work remember the penis has to stay hard in what is pretty must a dark wet cave. Unless you create a mini miners helmet there would be no light.

Re:Got ED? (1)

catmistake (814204) | more than 3 years ago | (#33745858)

1) veins don't deliver blood, arteries do

Arteries don't deliver blood either, no more than a riverbed transports a river or the fish within it. And even if you were correct, the notion of blood delivery would be incidental and wrong headed. The blood delivers oxygen from, and returns carbon dioxide to, the lungs. The heart is what moves the blood.

/pedant

Re:Got ED? (1)

scapermoya (769847) | more than 3 years ago | (#33747398)

that's semantics.

in the context of what the poster was saying, i was pointing out that it is arteries that serve as conduits for blood that is flowing toward the penis (and all other tissues of the body), and veins are what serve as conduits for blood flowing away from the tissues.

thanks for your deep insight though.

/medical student

Re:Got ED? (1)

catmistake (814204) | more than 3 years ago | (#33747664)

that's semantics.

Why is accuracy always dismissed as merely being semantics, as though using proper linguistics and meanings were unimportant and trivial? Without semantics, everyone would be a babbling idiot. Semantics is of the utmost importance in intelligent discourse.

I humbly recommend that if you succeed at your discipline, and become licenced, that you pay more respect to experienced registered nurses than you have shown for language and how it's understood. Both can, and more than likely will, save your ass.

/doctor of philosophy

Re:Got ED? (1)

scapermoya (769847) | more than 3 years ago | (#33747986)

not always, just when the correction is trivial and doesn't contribute to the understanding at hand. isn't hyperbole ("always") a more dangerous use of language? so much for respect.

to be completely accurate, arteries do indeed 'deliver' blood, as they are responsible for the distribution of the blood to the body. feel free to pop open oed, which I'm sure a doctor of your caliber has at the ready, if you doubt me.

additionally, the elastic quality of the major arteries allows for pumping of blood outside the heart, which more closely fits with your highly specific (but in the context of the discussion at hand, meaningless) definition of deliver. and let's not forget the smooth muscle around arteries which can contract, leading to yet another form of active 'delivery' of blood.

thanks for your career advice, doc. it has been taken to heart.

Re:Got ED? (1)

badkarmadayaccount (1346167) | more than 3 years ago | (#33764578)

The veins still have smooth muscle - won't it be easier to contract it?

Re:Got ED? (1)

scapermoya (769847) | more than 3 years ago | (#33765038)

there is a moderate amount of smooth muscle found in the venous system. from what I have been taught (only in my first year of medical school), these muscles are not under the same kind of highly-specific nervous system control that the muscle in arteries is under. ie, your body has a hard time selectively contracting/relaxing specific veins. these muscles are predominantly under hormonal control, meaning that their contraction is regulated at a body-wide level.

the vast majority of control over where blood flows in the body is at the level of arterioles, which are small arteries found before capillary beds.

Re:Got ED? (1)

Samantha Wright (1324923) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743250)

As someone who has worked with both channelrhodopsin and halorhodopsin in optogenetics, I assure you that you're quite mistaken. The decision to direct blood flow towards the male genitalia is ultimately processed by muscles that restrict blood flow to the penis when they are contracted. Adding halorhodopsin to these muscle cells, which causes hyperpolarisation and blocks action potentials from having an effect, would indeed permit a light-inducible erection.

Only on Slashdot do you find such answers.

Re:Got ED? (1)

cappp (1822388) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743318)

I was merely saying that the article explicity addressed using light to contract muscles, that was all. Using the method as described in the article, without some refinement as you described, wouldn't do the job as far as I know. Clearly I should have been clearer with the point I was making and if there was an edit button I'd be clicking it pretty hard right now. Thanks for pointing out the mistake though, it's always cool hearing from someone with actual direct knowledge.

Re:Got ED? (1)

TamCaP (900777) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743608)

First, we all now that current version of halorhodopsin sucks. Talk to KD or GF - they are still trying to improve Halorhodopsin to cause any serious hyperpolarization at reasonable light levels. On the other hand, the current chr2s work just fine. Instead of placing halo in the muscle put chr2s in the neurons that are inhibitory to the ones causing muscle contraction. Actually, anyone knows how exactly the circuitry down there works?
On the other hand, going at it with an optical fiber sticking out your back and connected to a class 3 laser light source might definitely be a mood killer. You should instead try the hM3Dq receptors and a nice dose of CNO ;-)

Re:Got ED? (1)

ehrichweiss (706417) | more than 3 years ago | (#33742936)

That was my very first thought, though for ED it's more about relaxing those muscles, not tightening them.

Re:Got ED? (1)

Samantha Wright (1324923) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743322)

Incidentally, we have light-activated ion channels that can do both. Channelrhodopsin causes a signal to be sent (depolarisation). Halorhodopsin, which was isolated from an archaean, causes hyperpolarisation and can prevent signalling. The great thing is that their activation wavelengths are different enough that you can use them in the same cell with different lights to control them.

This technology... (2, Funny)

Reilaos (1544173) | more than 3 years ago | (#33742948)

I bet people would be masters of raves and/or the disco with proper application of this tech.

Ingenius! (1)

erroneus (253617) | more than 3 years ago | (#33742992)

Yet another thing I should have thought of myself but didn't. The idea seems generally simple and solves the problem of the interface between living tissue and synthetic components.

I wonder, though, if this foreign tissue interface wouldn't simply get rejected and attacked by the body? Other concerns that occur to me are in the fact that light does get in through the body even if is is just a little. What problems could that cause?

This seems slightly less than ideal, but does address the problem of a synthetic interface that could corrode or otherwise develop resistance between the living tissue and the synthetic... or does it? I suppose what is really needed is a set of cells in the body modified to deal with TTL signals natively without rejecting... possibly highly conductive modified bone or tooth material that can be inserted at the point needed and transmit messages this way.

All of this is something of a stop-gap anyway, I suppose where the real answers lie in regeneration of entire organs and limbs.

Re:Ingenius!-Pretentgenius! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33743120)

Thats, Just like your opinion...Mannnn

Re:Ingenius! (1)

SteeldrivingJon (842919) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743242)

" Other concerns that occur to me are in the fact that light does get in through the body even if is is just a little. What problems could that cause?"

It's just blue light. A UV filter might be good, but it's not strong enough to burn or anything, and is going to be directed via fiber optics to the cells that are sensitized.

I mean, the laser light is kind of a small matter when you're talking about injecting a virus to cause cells to express new genes and become sensitive to light.

This is cybernetics (2, Interesting)

foniksonik (573572) | more than 3 years ago | (#33742994)

This is technology that could drive real cyberorganisms. Artificial muscle and nerves coupled together with this light sensitive protein and an optical system controlled by an electronic brain (or quantum super computer if you prefer).

We've even demonstrated glucose power cells. All that's left is a circulatory system to feed the tissue.

Cool indeed.

Re:This is cybernetics (1)

EEPROMS (889169) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743192)

yes an organic enhanced exoskeleton came to mind when I read this. I can imagine them being grown to fit specific users needs either for heavy industry or the military use so they can carry larger and more heavier items.

Re:This is cybernetics (1)

theshowmecanuck (703852) | more than 3 years ago | (#33744108)

Unless it can connect directly to the central nervous system it isn't any better than current electro-stimulation. Possibly it is worse if you also need to genetically modify a person. Instead of genetically modifying cells with light receptors from other organisms (this is just rehashing previous gene splicing), they should focus on finding mechanisms to regrow nerves in humans so they can rebuild the original neural architecture that was damaged in the person. That and finding a way to trigger the ability that generally goes dormant in humans within days after birth to allow us to regrow say a lost finger... or leg, or ....

Re:This is cybernetics (1)

foniksonik (573572) | more than 3 years ago | (#33745708)

Missing the point. The thought is for machines to use this to gain muscles. There is a central nervous system, the CPU. It would direct light pulses to lab grown muscle tissue attached to artificial bone material with artificial vascular vessels to feed them nutrients.

Completely artificial yet organic body controlled by a digital brain via optics.

more importantly... (1)

iPhr0stByt3 (1278060) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743124)

But can it make dead and severed limbs move again? mmmmh, zombies.

Re:more importantly... (1)

pwnies (1034518) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743312)

Yes it can, but only temporarily. Severed limbs still have living cells in them. Applying an electric charge to them *will* make them move, although this process uses the existing neural pathways to deliver the charge (similar to how the body does it). These pathways run out of steam pretty quickly though, so it'd probably only work for a few minutes after the limb was removed.

What would someone who had this done be called? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33743132)

An optogenerian?

What about the immunue system (1)

Bazar (778572) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743210)

Since they are adding foreign organic materal into the host, doesn't that mean the host would have to have immune suppressants to stop his body from destroying the cells.

Sounds like its far from a perfect. You might be able to restore functionality to disabled limbs, but at the cost your your immune system.

It's really too bad... (1)

jenningsthecat (1525947) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743264)

...that the Religious Right is going to kick up such a fuss about this. Anything that involves genetics sends them into a tizzy. Then it's likely that the Republicans will kowtow to the religious wingnuts, the Democrats will fold like a tent, and the research will be set back by years. A pity, really, given the potential of this research to alleviate some human suffering.

Re:It's really too bad... (1)

ScentCone (795499) | more than 3 years ago | (#33745616)

Anything that involves genetics sends them into a tizzy

Actually, my observation is that it's the lefty wingnuts that have the biggest fits about genetic engineering. Which is ironic, of course, since the founders of the Progressive movement were also big fans of eugenics.

handbags 2010 (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33743420)

I didn't realize how old this article was until I saw that searching was amazing just like i didn't konw how cheap the
pro nfl shop [pronflshop.com]was until i click to the
cheap nfl Jerseys [pronflshop.com] shopare you want to konw anthers?please go the handbags outlet [guccidiorhandbag.com] site.there are all
Handbags 2010 [guccidiorhandbag.com] for buyer,and also there are many kinds of
ugg classic short [uggclassicol.com] with a words,you may more like the
ugg classic tall [uggclassicol.com].many ugg boots on sale [uggclassicol.com].

Cancer (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33743536)

Bright blue light piercing in to their skin. Cancer risk?

Now for generating light from nerve impulses (2, Insightful)

mr_mischief (456295) | more than 3 years ago | (#33743606)

If they can make muscles contract and relax according to the supply or lack thereof of a bright light, then a great next step is to get a bundle of nerve tissue to generate a bright light when they are excited. Then fiber optics could potentially be used as artificial nerve tissue to route around damage. The limits of bioluminescence might not allow for interaction with this, though.

Even if there's an inorganic portion needed to generate a bright enough light, having that controlled directly by nerve tissue (and maybe fueled by ATP or body heat if possible) could be a huge advance over the conductive wires and external battery bags being tested now.

This is old news (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33743874)

Neuroscience researchers have been using optogenetics to selectively excite neurons in rat/mouse brains for years now.

handbags 2010 (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33744150)

However mean your life is,meet it and live it ;do not shun it and call it hard

pro nfl shop [pronflshop.com]names.It is not so bad as you are.It looks poorest when you

are Handbags 2010 [guccidiorhandbag.com] richest.The fault-finder will find faults in

paradise.Love your cheap nfl Jerseys [pronflshop.com] life ,poor as it is.You may

perhaps have some ugg classic short [uggclassicol.com]pleasant,thrilling,glorious

hourss,even in a poor-house.The setting sun is reflected from the ugg [uggclassicol.com]

boots on sale windows of the alms-house as brightly as from the rich man’s abode ; the snow melts before its

door as early in the spring.I do
not see ugg classic tall [uggclassicol.com]but a quiet mind may live as contentedly

there,and have as cheering thoughts,as in a palace. handbags [guccidiorhandbag.com]

outlet.

I can imagine the scenes (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33744440)

On every family photograph, Rupert was an embarrasment. How he managed to flail just when the flash went off remained a mystery to the photographer.

Good for Geek paraplegics only (1)

flyingfsck (986395) | more than 3 years ago | (#33744474)

With this technology, the user has to stay out of the sun, otherwise his limbs will twitch uncontrollably, so only Geeks living in basements need apply...

I wonder.... (1)

hesaigo999ca (786966) | more than 3 years ago | (#33745696)

I wonder if this could be used to enhance the nervous system,
such as those stories of people with amazing levels of strength
I think it might shed some light on this subject.

what's the advantage (1)

Khashishi (775369) | more than 3 years ago | (#33747792)

What's the advantage over using electrical impulses to contract muscles? AFAIK, we've made frog legs move since near the dawn of electricity.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...