Ask Slashdot: Could We Reconnect Eastern Libya? 290
GrumpyBagpuss writes "We all know that the internet is supposed to route around damage, but currently eastern Libya is off the net because all their connectivity goes through Tripoli. How difficult would it to be to reconnect eastern Libya via a microwave link to Crete? It's less than 200km away, on the Libyan end there are mountains up to 850m and on Crete they're higher than 2000m. People have achieved distances of over 300km with simple WiFi equipment, but would it be possible to increase the bandwidth to handle a whole, or at least half a country? How would you connect the link at both ends? What other problems would there be? How many Pringles cans would we need?"
Beyond my tech skills... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Yes, please. Someone set up an effort, and a site, and some transparency/accountability, and let's do it!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe this is the chance for some Netzero style ISP to get a hell of a lot of free publicity and goodwill? Seems to me like it would be a hell of a public relations coup
To what end? To convince a bunch of people on broadband to switch to dialup? Not likely. To convince a bunch of people still on dialup to switch ISPs (also not likely). Coca-Cola likes free publicity because they sell more cans of Coke. The same doesn't apply here...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
The trunks may all go through Tripoli. It may actually be necessary to tie in a new uplink of some sort. I have no idea where the major exchanges are in Libya, which makes it a bit difficult to know what a good solution might be.
Re: (Score:2)
So ungrateful! Where do you think Libbys vegetables are from?
Very dear to many Slashdot members are JAVA and chocolate. Guess what comes from The Republic of CÃte d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast) which isn't too far from Libya?
If you're grumpy because you don't have a job or something, lighten up. There could be a future for you in biofuel. So just sit back and watch Soylent Green or something and relax.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, thank heavens no one would ever stoop to stereotyping a whole state.
Re:Please Don't compare Libya to Alabama (Score:4, Insightful)
Why are we talking about Eastern fucking Libya on Slashdot again?
your description of the people of Libya applies to Alabama too.
Except I cannot recall the last time I saw Alabama mentioned on Slashdot.
Re: (Score:3)
Which is probably one of the reasons they don't have a crazy dictator slaughtering thousands.
Is it worth it? (Score:5, Interesting)
While the Internet played a huge role in relatively developed Egypt, it might be worth pointing out that less than 7% of Libya's population has Internet access, and most of those people are in Tripoli.
While there are surely isolated pockets of connectivity in the Western parts of the country, the usage is minimal and may not actually have a great impact on this revolution.
Just a thought....
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
There's usually a lot of noise and very little signal at interconnects. However, signal propagates to peers while noise does not. Without carrier, there is neither signal nor noise.
Re:Is it worth it? (Score:4, Interesting)
I think, if possible, a serious effort couldn't hurt, and would be an interesting test of our abilities to step in as people, where our governments for political reasons cannot.
Re: (Score:2)
> less than 7% of Libya's population has Internet access
That's the point, yo. When an area is information-poor, the value of each packet goes up, not down.
Yes, it's worth it? (Score:2)
But, one of the problems for the media has been getting news out of Libya. Having a functioning net connection helps a lot in that even if most don't have access to it. You're not limited to satellite phones and portable sat terminals which are expensive and often slow.
How better to say "You are not alone."? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
local interconnected long distance links to form some kind of mesh network would be interesting.
internet link would probably hard because of the required bandwidth from node to node, but local you've limited content
some of the nodes may have a separate internet access to post info to the world, while the local network allow local communication
Doesn't even matter (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
.. and that 5.1% probably had the resources to get out of the country when the shooting started.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Those people were almost all in Tripoli. There are a few thosuand people with access in the Western parts, frequently via WiMax connection, which is run by the state telecom.
Since that is shut down, beaming some sort of backbone at them doesn't do jack.....
Re: (Score:2)
Why "getting information out of the country" is necessary? To call the foreign enemies so they can take over and install their puppets?
Re: (Score:2)
Translation: It's OK for us to conquest a country if it was ruled by people we don't like.
Re: (Score:2)
I think that has been the point of some of Saif Islam Gaddhafi's speechs.
Like you, he wants the world to turn away so his dad can murder his people more comfortably in private.
Re: (Score:2)
One of the unfortunate things about revolutions is that the revolutionaries, on success, must be prepared to rule. Though they may be united about casting off the evil dictator, they may have less consensus about implementation details on acceptable forms of government afterward. This leads to an unfortunate condition referred to as "Somalia syndrome".
Mesh wireless is now an off-the-shelf technology. A couple of long-reach wi-fi links and a couple thousand airdropped wireless mess router access points a
Not sure this is the time to work on internet (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Not sure this is the time to work on internet (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, that worked really well for the Taliban, big supporters of western democracies and all around great guys!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It wasn't a battle for democracy, it was a battle of liberation.
One man's liberation is another man's occupation.
Afghanis don't care that the invaders changed from The Soviet Menace to Pakistani Taliban to American Freedom Police any more than they did when it shifted from the Achaemenid Empire under Darius to Alexander The Great and then the Greeks for Eucratides. They've been "liberated" in turns by every empire that ever came near their corner of the planet. But they're still there. Resistance has become what they are. Foreign peoples have, for no discernable r
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Yes, Im sure more weapons is the way to solve it. Specially in the hands of people not trained to handle them.
I mean, what could go wrong ?
Re:Not sure this is the time to work on internet (Score:4, Informative)
Do you really think an AK-47 is that hard to figure out? There's a reason that's the rifle of choice for conscript armies the world over.
Firing a weapon isn't brain surgery, it doesn't take years of practice to do it right. Just give them the gun, tell them where to point the end the bullets come out of and how to put more in, then let 'em go.
Re: (Score:2)
Right. Which is why cops get lots of psychological training to learn how to deal with the consequences of firing a gun.
And why do many people are shot by mistake. Or why gun safety (keeping guns away from children) is still far from idea.
Not to mention what would happen to those guns AFTER the civil war is over.
Or how about all the amazing consequences of the last couple times USA gave rebels guns.
You know what "arms race" is ? Expected consequence: escalation in violence.
But what am I saying. I'm pretty su
Re: (Score:2)
Using guns in a civilian en
Re: (Score:2)
I dunno if it's quite as simple as that. I'm pretty sure somebody has to know how to do basic maintenance, even for a gun like the AK-47.
And a five-minute course in how to not to be a doofus would be nice too. (e.g. hold it properly, use short bursts, etc.)
Warfighting (Score:2)
Firing a weapon isn't brain surgery, it doesn't take years of practice to do it right. Just give them the gun, tell them where to point the end the bullets come out of and how to put more in, then let 'em go.
There is more to being a soldier than knowing how to fire a gun.
There is something to be said for the rigor of the old-school adventure game or hard-core tactical simulation. When you make a mistake it is "Game Over."
Re: (Score:2)
You obviously have never been in the infantry.
There's a lot more to small unit tactics, and even weapon use than point and pull the trigger.
Re: (Score:2)
Read on a forum somewhere regarding teh AK
A weapon designed in the 2nd world to be made in the 3rd world to be used by the 4th world and keep on working
Been seeing a lot of FN-FAL/L1A1/SLR types in the pics/news, as well as a smattering of CETME/G3/HK
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
From The Lord Of War:
Of all the weapons in the vast soviet arsenal, nothing was more profitable than Avtomat Kalashnikova model of 1947. More commonly known as the AK-47, or Kalashnikov. It's the world's most popular assault rifle. A weapon all fighters love. An elegantly simple 9 pound amalgamation of forged steel and plywood. It doesn't break, jam, or overheat. It'll shoot whether it's covered in mud or filled with sand. It's so easy, even a child can use it; and they do. The Soviets put the gun on a coin
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Not sure this is the time to work on internet (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Proper 'war' can be actually quite civil. It's the invasions that USA loves that get ugly...
Re:Not sure this is the time to work on internet (Score:5, Insightful)
Ghandi took India back from the British without any weapons.
America supplying weapons into the worlds trouble spots has rarely produced a good result. Take your Texas solutions and stick them up your ass.
Re:Not sure this is the time to work on internet (Score:5, Insightful)
Muammar Ghaddafi has already shown that he is very much willing to use whatever force necessary to keep himself in power.
The two situations are simply not comparable, it would be more along the lines of trying to convince someone like Joseph Stalin to step down trough peaceful non-violence demonstrations.
Re: (Score:3)
This would be the perfect application of the cross bow project.
Kudos if you know the reference :-)
Re: (Score:2)
This is what the 2nd amendment is for... and yes, I'd rather let them get armed up and fight for their own darn freedom than the US get involved in yet another land war/police action in Asia^HAfrica...
Re: (Score:2)
Gandhi (Score:2)
Was that a rhetorical question?
Anyways, Google [google.com] says he was killed by a Hindu terrorist group:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Mohandas_Karamchand_Gandhi [wikipedia.org]
http://pratyushgarg.instablogs.com/entry/why-gandhi-was-assassinated/ [instablogs.com]
Re:Not sure this is the time to work on internet (Score:5, Insightful)
More than that (Score:2)
It's not just about letting forces communicate and/or let evidence of atrocities leak out.
It's about connecting these people with expectations from government. All that youtubing and facebooking and tweeting gets the word out about how governments of strong successful nations function.
It's the one big thing that *might* prevent these revolutions going down the same shithole most others, from Cuba to Iran to Lebanon to Libya 40 years ago - have gone. Straight into the hands of a just marginally different opp
Re: (Score:3)
It might be better shipping the rebels AK's, anti tank weapons, man portable SAMS and lots of ammunition. Sat phones would be nice for communications but I'm not sure twitter and facebook are really all that important anymore.
Would you really want to send them AK-47s? I know arms sounds pretty handy right now. But I kind of hope for something better. A big part of modern wars is winning people's hearts and minds. For that, they need fast communication. Yes. Twitter, facebook and other social media sources have their role here. Instead of a top down push of information and ideas for a government or media, ideas can spread better if done on a peer to peer basis.
Re: (Score:2)
Have you seen the situation? Villages are getting assaulted by the army, tanks and all! People are reporting air raids and need to find AA guns to defend their homes. Children and teenagers are killed just for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Civilians are forced to take arms and carry AK-47s, use rocket launchers and man defensive batteries to stop the extermination of whatever resistance there is.
Winning people's hearts and minds is too late now. This is war. You don't win wars by tweeting "Hey
Re: (Score:2)
There would be a temporary hyperinflation and local devaluation of the dollar. Dropping money on a place where there's nothing much to be had for the money -- doesn't make much sense. Due to very low supply and high demand, you'd end up having to pay $100 per a loaf of bread.
Satellite perhaps? (Score:5, Insightful)
Why bother with microwave links, cables, mountains, etc. when you can drop a few hundred satellite modems with wifi. I guess they have satellite dishes already, all they need are a modem and an omnidirectional antenna in each neighborhood.
Re:Satellite perhaps? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I started reading this thread thinking, "Hey, wouldn't it be cool to get some practical insight into how to deploy a microwave link across hundreds of miles of open air, under the pressure of being in a war zone, no less". But what I have read instead are lame excuses for why they should use something else. Hell, I guess they could even use dial-up with AOL if they still have working telephone lines. I hate to be the insensitive, semi-autistic brat in the crowd, but can someone with experience setting up
Re:Satellite perhaps? (Score:5, Informative)
Why bother with microwave links, cables, mountains, etc. when you can drop a few hundred satellite modems with wifi. I guess they have satellite dishes already, all they need are a modem and an omnidirectional antenna in each neighborhood.
BINGO
More importantly, modern VSAT equipment is moderately portable (e.g. in a small vehicle). You can break it down in about 10 minutes and set it up again in about 20. Perfect for the rebel/journalist/activist on the move. You can buy complete systems (dish, modem, switches, software etc.) for less than US$5000.00. Add a couple/three 12 dBi wifi panels and you can service a fairly large area, depending on your location. Power requirements are low enough that you could run most of it from the battery of the truck you're transporting it on.
(Yeah, I've looked into this stuff in the past while doing consulting work in the developing world....)
Technology isn't the problem. (Score:2)
You don't even need junked-together tin can wi-fi. Assuming there is something in the air to talk to, you could probably just set up a satellite uplink/downlink and not need to worry about distance or anything. The technology for this is readily available and has been deployed all around the world.
The problem is that the government would probably not like this and is also probably very likely to find it and "deal with it" in the same way that they deal with any other communications channel they don't appr
TSFI already deployed a team (Score:5, Informative)
Télécoms sans Frontières already deployed a team to the libyan-tunesian border.
http://www.tsfi.org/en/action/emergencies/147-tsf-deploye-a-la-frontiere-tunisielibye
Consider donating some money: http://www.tsfi.org/en/action/donateonline
Re: (Score:2)
mod anon parent, tx
Re:TSFI already deployed a team (Score:5, Interesting)
I thought this was quite interesting:
"TSF's founders realized that, in addition to medical and food aid, there was a critical need for reliable emergency telecommunications services. Conflicts and emergencies often led to massive civilian displacement and separated families. And affected populations are often left with no communications infrastructure in place to find assistance and loved ones."
Makes sense to me, I sent them EU50.
Re: (Score:2)
Mohammed Nabbous is the rebel IT guru. OPEC has made 500k USD available to Libya through OFID.
via Satelllite is fastest to set up connectivity (Score:2, Informative)
In my opinion as of a long time network and internet engineer (+25 years). Satellite based Internet is fastest way if we just got them gear on ground.
http://www.satsig.net/ivsat-europe.htm
It's not that great for all use like voip or interactive shell use because of latency and jitter, but for file transfers uploading and downloading web browsing, email, twitter etc. it is OK.
sure it can be done (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I'm sure that a couple of thousand dollars will be no problem for the residents of war-torn Libya.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A cell site of any decent capacity and transmitter power is going to cost $50 - $100K, not a "couple of thousand". And you better hope people that want to use it are close to the mountaintop since GSM is limited to around 25 miles from the cell site. CDMA doesn't have a hard limit, though you've still got a problem with receiving the signal from a cell phone transmitting at less than 1 watt (typically with a very low gain antenna) - max range is probably not much more than 30 miles even if you have clear li
Egypt (Score:2)
Greece (Score:2)
Forget Wireless (Score:2)
Get some BIG spools of optic fibre, a plough, and some telco-grade routers. Then just run dozens of cables across the border into the edge towns. Then run the local routers (that all lead to Tripoli and their central telecoms hub) backwards.
Failing that, there's an old Interop saying: "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station-wagon full of tapes on the freeway."
Re: (Score:2)
Ha! Gonna have to write that one down.
Re: (Score:2)
Could We? (Score:2)
"Should we" is the better question. They are a sovereign nation and wishes should be respected. How you would you feel about a bunch of outsiders pushing their agenda on your fellow citizens, which is exactly what this entails if you boil it down to the basics?
'Internet' isn't a basic human right.
Re: (Score:2)
"Should we" is the better question. They are a sovereign nation and wishes should be respected. How you would you feel about a bunch of outsiders pushing their agenda on your fellow citizens, which is exactly what this entails if you boil it down to the basics?
'Internet' isn't a basic human right.
Trolling?
Qaddaffi is a poster child for war crimes. The international community has an obligation to oppose, subvert, and eventually put to trial leaders who send armies to fire upon unarmed citizens.
This isn't some game. This isn't something that can be rationalized and boiled down to basics unless you have the express goal of sticking your head in the sand. If you believe the few western news reports trickling out of the country, people have been routinely slaughtered and the war crimes covered up.
And
Re: (Score:2)
"Should we" is the better question. They are a sovereign nation and wishes should be respected. How you would you feel about a bunch of outsiders pushing their agenda on your fellow citizens, which is exactly what this entails if you boil it down to the basics?
'Internet' isn't a basic human right.
Trolling?
Qaddaffi is a poster child for war crimes. The international community has an obligation to oppose, subvert, and eventually put to trial leaders who send armies to fire upon unarmed citizens.
This isn't some game. This isn't something that can be rationalized and boiled down to basics unless you have the express goal of sticking your head in the sand. If you believe the few western news reports trickling out of the country, people have been routinely slaughtered and the war crimes covered up.
And maybe you haven't been paying attention to the things Qaddaffi has already done? Seriously, take a few minutes to read up. This man is a terrorist who is hell-bent on repressing his citizens as well as attacking the rest of the non-Arab world. Moreover, unlike many other leaders, he isn't all talk: he has committed substantial violent acts both domestically and internationally. This man needs to be removed from power and tried in The Hague and leave the Libyans to select their own desired form of government. Again, this is not a domestic Libyan issue, this is an international issue.
All that not withstanding, the parent posters final statement is correct. 'Internet' isn't a basic human right and the Ask Slashdot question is asking if the "International Community" (which really comes down to the US and some other countries in the UN) could go in and set it up. You're more likely to get killed and have all your equipment stolen. Internet is the last thing on the average Libyan's mind right now. They want weapons, either for attacking the current regime or defending it. They have no
Re: (Score:2)
Internet should be a basic human right, it's the only way that people come to find out what it's like in the rest of the world. The bigger issue is as you say, interfering with a sovereign state. Gaddafi has already been claiming that foreign powers are riling up the Libyan people, finding something like this would definitely embolden him.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Those evil outsiders. Daring to put in links to a blacked out area so people can talk and communicate.
I don't buy it. Countries violate the sovereignty of others all the time. And then cry great walrus tears when their own is infringed on. If you were arguing against a no fly zone, or military aid to one side I'd give it more credence.
After all, Gaddhafi just wants to be left alone so he can murder his people in peace and not have people around the world know he's doing it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know what country you're posting from, but the American Revolution was surely helped by the French, and appreciated it.
>'Internet' isn't a basic human right.
I don't quite know what the relevancy of that statement is. Food also isn't "a basic human right", but people still send food to, e.g., earthquake devastated areas like Haiti.
Carrier Pigeon Internet (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
IP-over-carrier-pigeon was a classic joke, but it made an interesting point... Internet Protocols don't have to be confined to computers. The exact same protocols can be enacted by people. (Just packet size and latency go up :-)
What you describe is already happening. I've read reports of one guy who's barely slept in a week because he keeps driving back and forth across the border, shuttling hard drives to foreign journalists.
They need Pringles cans? (Score:2)
Prepare now for instability in the US (Score:2)
It's probably too late for a new network in Libya.
Sooner or later the US government will weaken and fall as the economy tanks. I expect hyperinflation brought on by mid-east instability wreaking havoc on oil prices.
I recommend everyone get setup with amateur radio license and gear ASAP.
Solar panels or other off-grid power source will be worth major bonus points.
Re: (Score:2)
You want to have a license now to get the gear and get the experience / make the connections without being hassled by the FCC. After the fall you only need the gear, experience and connections.
Re: (Score:3)
Not so much the FCC, but the greybeards who will turn you in as soon as looking at you, all the while muttering about how in their day you needed to understand code @500wpm to even look at a radio.
Tech aint the problem (Score:2)
The technology isn't the problem... the problem is the supporters of the current government with weapons that would take out the dishes.
Technically its not hard (Score:2)
I guess it would be quite cheap that the US navy upgrades some ship to be in front of the coast with strongly directed Antennas to pick up/transmit Wireless (WiMAX, if you like to have an polular standard) signals or provides a directed radio links which can provide infrastructure for mobile cell towers. Probably something like strongly directed GSM network cell would also be possible.
Electronic Warefare Troops can probably do similar things with analog radio since a long time.
However that wold make the par
The challenge is the other side (Score:2)
I've spent a lot of time doing communications in remote areas of the world. Your biggest challenge in this case is going to be the other end. You can blast what you want from outside the country, but until you get something actually inside the country to blast back to you, you are pretty much screwed.
Having said that, in a pinch a Pringle can might be enough to get something going, or if you are a fan of the movies, someone who sneaks into the country with a bunch of microwave equipment on their backs. T
Doable (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Surely you can prioritize bandwidth for something like this. The situation sounds to me like the emergency protocols of amateur radio apply.
Re:Slashdot is getting old in the teeth... (Score:4, Interesting)
No shit.
This isn't an Ask Slashdot solution. It's a "Ask the companies providing connectivity" solution. No, an individual isn't going to get a 300km wireless link up, unless they happen to have some friends with towers (preferably on mountains), and gear on both ends. Even then you aren't going to make a connection for everyone in the country (even at the low user per citizen number they have). What are they planning? To say "Hey [provider], I established a link. Route everything through my house." Ha.
From TFA:
What's the bandwidth requirement for the whole country? What do the providers on each end have available? What do you mean how to connect both ends, don't you understand routing? Pringles cans, are you fucking kidding me?
With the numbers he gave (200km distance, 1st tower 850m, 2nd tower 2000m), line of sight could be 304km.
He didn't ask the magic questions. Just because you put something up on each mountain, doesn't mean that there's anything to connect to. Power? Fiber/Copper lines? Is there anything in the way? Does it take a wireless bridge on the two sides, and then another pair (or more) to get it to somewhere with service?
I doubt there's a provider anywhere who would let a hobbiest bridge their networks. Oh, did we forget bandwidth fees, port charges, roof rights, etc, etc, etc? Nah, it all must be free, because a hobbiest thinks it's a good idea to do.
Re: (Score:2)
Haha about temperature differences causing "internal copper" to become damaged. Internal copper, hmm, because Cat5e has external copper sheathing, you say? LOL. No, temperature differences in Libya are irrelevant if you're talking about Cat5e or Cat6.
As for distance -- we're talking about wireless links. You completely missed the point and your post is still rated Insightful? WTF?
Re: (Score:3)
A war?
Yes, and the last thing freedom fighters need is rampant internet porn distracting them from their work.
"You difficult to fire an M60E with one hand son..."
Re: (Score:2)
That's true.. but I have known some people rumored to be so good they can switch hands and gain a stroke.
I bet they would not be slowed down that much in a firefight.
Re:It can be done (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Not to mention reinforcing the claims of foreign interference and probably making his supports more steadfast.
Re: (Score:2)