Beta

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

USC Researchers Demonstrate Real-Life Gmail Motion

timothy posted more than 3 years ago | from the when-reality-trumps dept.

Input Devices 32

An anonymous reader writes "In this tongue-in-cheek video, researchers at the USC Institute for Creative Technologies take playful jabs at Google as they demonstrate their software controlling Gmail with a Microsoft Kinect sensor. The gesture controls are strikingly similar to those jokingly suggested by Google in their fictional Gmail Motion application, posted as an April Fools' day prank. The researchers have made their software available for free on their website."

cancel ×

32 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Pirst fost (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35693230)

First post!

Re:Pirst fost (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35693316)

Why?

Re:Pirst fost (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35693346)

Why?

Because this is another useless dumbass story about a complete non-issue. And April Fools is over.

It is not worthy of a real comment. More "frosty piss" bullshit actually makes sense here.

Re:Pirst fost (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35693780)

You sir speak the truth.

It's hopelessly sad what makes it as news here -_-

wow... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35693252)

their moms basement is well lit.

Re:wow... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35693292)

You sound jealous, did your mom cut off the power?

Re:wow... (1)

m.ducharme (1082683) | more than 3 years ago | (#35693916)

[Droopy Dog Voice] Yes. [/Droopy Dog Voice]

It would be even more awesome... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35693350)

... if they did this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiZNtTLAwz8

Who didn't see this coming? (3, Funny)

devincook (1929234) | more than 3 years ago | (#35693390)

Seriously... anytime anyone posts a good idea (even slightly outlandish) on the internet with no implementation, it gets implemented. How awesome would a combination hooker and blackjack machine be? Have at it, internet.

Re:Who didn't see this coming? (1)

Fuzzums (250400) | more than 3 years ago | (#35693404)

...that brings cold beer.

Re:Who didn't see this coming? (2)

orkysoft (93727) | more than 3 years ago | (#35693540)

In fact, forget about the hooker and blackjack!

Re:Who didn't see this coming? (1)

Fuzzums (250400) | more than 3 years ago | (#35693556)

Walk-ing fridge : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOvoO6eQDms [youtube.com]

Re:Who didn't see this coming? (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35693528)

I was surprised Google themselves didn't do this. Remember: always take your jokes to the next level.

Re:Who didn't see this coming? (1)

JustOK (667959) | more than 3 years ago | (#35695984)

that's what SHE said.

Re:Who didn't see this coming? (4, Funny)

Ihmhi (1206036) | more than 3 years ago | (#35693734)

It's great, isn't it? It's speech recognition software for people who use sign language.

Re:Who didn't see this coming? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35693904)

The difference is, it would probably be much much easier both to control and to implement, with far fewer errors.

Re:Who didn't see this coming? (1)

anton_kg (1079811) | more than 3 years ago | (#35705418)

The really cool thing is that there is only one sign language. May be we should all learn it and it won't be any language barrier anymore. If you know what I mean. Then we would need a software which would convert all languages to one - sing language.

Re:Who didn't see this coming? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35705694)

Actually there are a few dialects of sign but there are so many similarities that signers can learn each new dialect in a matter of minutes/hours.

Re:Who didn't see this coming? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35712088)

My wife does ASL interpreting, and they are having trouble getting people to do it for $60 an hour.

Re:Who didn't see this coming? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35693884)

so you could get screwed both ways at once...

Loose slots (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35698368)

combination hooker and blackjack machine

Where would you insert the coins?

Re:Who didn't see this coming? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35698550)

How awesome would a combination hooker and blackjack machine be? Have at it, internet.

Nice try, but I'm not sharing.

Potential (1)

gmuslera (3436) | more than 3 years ago | (#35693560)

If well could be risky to use that in normal environments (like with voice commands, the computer have no way to tell that what you did or said was for it or for someone else in reach), have some potential for not so normal environments or uses. And that it is flexible enough to emulate gmail joke in little time mean that it could be ready for special uses.

Re:Potential (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35694730)

have it only work when you are staring at the screen...

Congratulations to the USC Team (1)

jacksonyee (590218) | more than 3 years ago | (#35693632)

After the tragedy/comedy combination that was April Fool's Day, it's nice to see someone taking a joke and turning it into someone useful. As a poster mentioned earlier yesterday, it would be quite nice to give Outlook the finger and have a sad face or a pouting puppy popup on your computer. That would take a large amount of the users' and tech support's rage out.

I am by no means in favor of a Minority Report-style interface for everyday computing, but it would be useful in certain situations. To release this software in a day is something that I would have expected only from the collegiate level, particularly from MIT, Carnegie Mellon, or Berkley. Keep the good work up, USC.

Ha! Joke's on you! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35695012)

Actually, $UC is itself a joke. To mention Figueroa Tech in the same breath as MIT, CM or Cal is an insult to those institutions.

Re:Congratulations to the USC Team (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35696860)

And Stanford can SUCK IT

fun (2)

r00b (923145) | more than 3 years ago | (#35693820)

Walk behind coworkers at their computer and do the delete gesture.

Dancing Easter Egg (1)

daboochmeister (914039) | more than 3 years ago | (#35695730)

I hear if you do a whole zumba routine in front of it, it emails a death threat to Jillian Michaels.

Text entry (1)

qvatch (576224) | more than 3 years ago | (#35697164)

Text entry should be semaphore. It would be most fitting.

Good job USC! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35697960)

There will be some silly and serious implementations that will just be amazing. Kinect will likely change many things (good or bad) in the next few years. If any thing I though Google's prank was a bit sour grapes. Yes, obviously Kinect can't be used for all concepts, but also more obvious interaction concepts will evolve so that there may eventually be useful ways to interact with Gmail or Outlook with Kinect in the near future.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?
or Connect with...

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>