Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

7.4-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Off Japan; Tsunami Alert Issued

CmdrTaco posted more than 3 years ago | from the oh-crap-not-again dept.

Japan 313

There is breaking news that a 7.4 Magnitude Quake has hit off the coast of Japan, and a Tsuanmi warning has been made. Please post updates in the comments.

cancel ×

313 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Crap! (-1, Troll)

grub (11606) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744856)


I hope this doesn't affect Apple's supply chain.

Re:Crap! (3, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35744902)

not funny

Re:Crap! (-1, Troll)

miffo.swe (547642) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744958)

Ofcourse its funny, i have no problem imaging Stevists in a circlejerk being much more worried about their ipads than the japanese people.

Re:Crap! (1)

somersault (912633) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745120)

i have no problem imaging Stevists in a circlejerk

Eww.

Re:Crap! (-1, Troll)

intheshelter (906917) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745456)

Funny how the Apple haters use every opportunity to make something totally unrelated appear negative towards Apple. The irony is your post above shows that you are much more worried about hating Apple than the Japanese people. Funny how that worked out.

Fastest slashdot story ever! (5, Informative)

inu_maru (843192) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744880)

I am still dizzy from the shake (living in yokohama), plenty of blurry images right now in http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/ [nhk.or.jp]

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (3, Interesting)

chemicaldave (1776600) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744942)

Vote this up. Link has a live english translation stream.

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (0)

Rakshasa Taisab (244699) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744990)

Dizzy? Were you perhaps riding on a roller-coaster while this happened?

A little shaking is all we got down here in the Tokyo area.

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (2)

inu_maru (843192) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745196)

live in a tall-ish building, the quake was over 3-shindo, was playing halo... yeah...

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (4, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745602)

For ref, 'cos I was wondering, "shindo" [wikipedia.org] is a japanese earthquake scale, not directly comparable to the richter [wikipedia.org] scale (or the "moment magnitude" [wikipedia.org] scale often mislabelled as richter in the media) - shindo is for various points on the earth's surface, richter for overall energy of quake.

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (4, Interesting)

theNetImp (190602) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745096)

This one lasted a good 2 minutes, steady shake once it got going. Trying to get back to sleep here in Chiba Prefecture.

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (5, Informative)

mc3000 (1875710) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745108)

No injuries reported, according to NHK. This was in the vicinity of the 9.0 quake, 40 km below the sea bed off Sendai.

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (3, Funny)

Pharmboy (216950) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745172)

You're right, this is fast. At first I just though it was a dupe from a few weeks ago.

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (1, Interesting)

Ephemeriis (315124) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745438)

Off-topic, but what's up with Slashdot links and FF4? Tried to go look at the images and the link didn't work. Had to copy & paste.

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (1)

dr. chuck bunsen (762090) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745546)

Don't know, but I can confirm the exact same issue in FF4 on Deb. It's getting really annoying.

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (3, Informative)

demonbug (309515) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745556)

Off-topic, but what's up with Slashdot links and FF4? Tried to go look at the images and the link didn't work. Had to copy & paste.

I've been having the same problem. Found it works to double-right-click (to open the context menu; single right click doesn't seem to work) and select "open in new tab", but pretty ridiculous. Even worse than before, when control-clicking to open a link in a new window just expand parent threads, often causing you to have to hunt all over the place to find the comment you were reading.

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (0)

Qzukk (229616) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745564)

Slashdot has fucked it up again. Double-right-click the link to get the context menu to open, then you can open in new tab.

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (0)

hoggoth (414195) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745580)

Thank you! I though something was wrong with my computer. I can't click or right-click on any links in Slashdot using Firefox. If someone comes up with a GreaseMonkey fix to stop Slashdot's brain damaged Javascript or CSS that is stopping clicks please share it.

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (1)

Foofoobar (318279) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745582)

judging from the amount of radioactive water they have been dumping, this is obviously Godzilla waking up. Duh.

Re:Fastest slashdot story ever! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745606)

Dizzy? In Yokohama?! Drama queen, it was barely a 3 there.

2m high tsunami (5, Informative)

AmiMoJo (196126) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744888)

According to the Japanese Meteorological Agency the tsunami is about 2m high. Coastal defences should be okay in most places but obviously anyone near the coast should retreat inland if possible.

Re:2m high tsunami (5, Funny)

tripleevenfall (1990004) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744904)

Thank you, I just happened to be checking slashdot to see what I should do.

Re:2m high tsunami (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35744994)

True story. Last year (?) a car with some teenage girls in North Dakota went into a ditch. Rather than call for help, one of the girls was posting about the situation on Facebook! Three of them drowned.

Re:2m high tsunami (1)

somersault (912633) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745146)

If you pass this on to 100 emergency personnel in the next 5 minutes, you will meet your true love tomorrow! If you don't, 3 of my friends will drown!

Sort of status I'd delete within reading the first 7 words, and block that person's updates from being on my homepage!

Re:2m high tsunami (2)

Farmer Tim (530755) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745170)

So I guess we should thank Mark Zuckerberg for cutting out the deadwood.

Re:2m high tsunami (1)

PPH (736903) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745130)

Then shouldn't you be waiting for the re-post in a few weeks?

7.4 versus 9.0 (1)

goombah99 (560566) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745312)

the richter scale is logarithmic so a 9 is something like 30 times larger in energy than a 7.4. On the other hand the march quake was initially rated as a 7.1 scale quake then updated later to 9.

Re:7.4 versus 9.0 (1)

Nick Ives (317) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745374)

On the Richter Scale each whole number represents an order of magnitude difference in energy, so a 9 is 100 times more powerful than a 7.

Re:7.4 versus 9.0 (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745506)

On the Richter Scale each whole number represents an order of magnitude difference in energy, so a 9 is 100 times more powerful than a 7.

Yes, it is also 10 times larger than an 8, and 30 times larger than a 7.4.

 

Re:7.4 versus 9.0 (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745562)

And 7.4 is between 7 (a 9 would be 100times as powerful) and 8 (a 9 would be 10 times as powerful). So a 9 is 10 to 100 times as powerful as a 7.4. 30 is in that range.

Re:7.4 versus 9.0 (1)

MarkGriz (520778) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745600)

"so a 9 is 100 times more powerful than a 7"

Yes, but a 9 is only about 30x more powerful than a 7.4, as the parent stated.

Actually it's closer to 40: 10^(9-7.4) = 39.8

Re:7.4 versus 9.0 (4, Informative)

Kentari (1265084) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745476)

One step in magnitude means a factor 10 increase in ground displacement. In energy this is about a factor 30 per magnitude. A 7.0 packs about 900 times less energy than a 9.0. The new earthquake has already been revised to 7.1.

Re:2m high tsunami (1)

AmiMoJo (196126) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744930)

Additional: only in Miyagi, elsewhere the tsunami is approx 0.5m. Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant should not be affected by the wave, although obviously there is still the quake to worry about...

Re:2m high tsunami (1)

kesara (871141) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744962)

According to Pacific Tsunami warning center (NOAA/NWS): No destructive widespread tsunami treat exists based on historical earthquake and tsunami data.

Re:2m high tsunami (1)

antifoidulus (807088) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745082)

Yeah, if you will recall there actually was a precursor 7.0 earthquake on the 9th of March, a tsunami warning was issued for Sendai, Miyagi(and probably Iwate too), but there was no tsunami.

Re:2m high tsunami (1)

Anne_Nonymous (313852) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745106)

In the event of a tsunami, the safest place to stand is between a mother bear and her cub. I repeat, the safest place to stand is between a mother bear and her cub. Please stand by for additional instructions.

trains (1)

fredan (54788) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744910)

how's the time schedule for the trains in Japan?

Re:trains (1)

inu_maru (843192) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745028)

jr east has mostly delays, you can check the details here:
http://www.jreast.co.jp/ [jreast.co.jp]

Re:trains (4, Interesting)

antifoidulus (807088) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745136)

Most are already offline, it happened at 11:30 there, the shinkansen have probably almost all stopped, most regional services in the area probably weren't running at any real capacity anyway, so I doubt they would be running there. It was far enough away from Tokyo that I doubt any of the metros were really affected.

FWIW I was riding on the shinkansen(headed to Germany for a bit since I didn't have water and food at my place :P) when a 6.1 struck Shizuoka. I have to hand it to the designers and operators of those cars, they handled it really well. You could actually barely feel anything on the car, but all of a sudden the lights went out and the train came to a sudden, but not abrupt stop since we lost all power. No derailing, no injuries.

Re:trains (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745302)

Wow! I know Europe and Japan have great trains systems, but Shizuoka to Germany on a bullet train, amazing!

Re:trains (1)

gilleain (1310105) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745560)

Wow! I know Europe and Japan have great trains systems, but Shizuoka to Germany on a bullet train, amazing!

Yeah, I hear they have transdimensional portals. Not cheap, but still cheaper than train travel in the UK, where we only lead the world in informing passengers which lines are delayed/closed...

7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (3, Informative)

140Mandak262Jamuna (970587) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744928)

The scales are logarithmic. 7.4 earthquake is about 150 times less powerful than a 9.2

Re:7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (4, Informative)

140Mandak262Jamuna (970587) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744978)

The correct ratio seems to be 31 ^ ( 9.2 - 7.4 ) = 483. So this earthquake would be considered a moderate one, about 500 times less powerful than the 9.2 that stuck a few weeks ago.

Re:7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745520)

moderate is 5-6
7 is major (according to the Richter scale - moderate compared to 3/11)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richter_magnitude_scale

Re:7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (2)

gilleain (1310105) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745618)

There seems to be some sort of increase in the size of the slashdot commenter estimates of earthquake power ratios. First commenter said 30 times, then 100, then 150, now 500. Is there a logarithmic function to describe this increase in accuracy?

Answer to non existent question (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35744992)

No one claimed they were close in power. 7.4 is still a strong earthquake and can still generate a damaging tsunami, especially in nearby areas.

Re:Answer to non existent question (1)

gman003 (1693318) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745290)

Just wait until the "traditional" media catches up to us. They'll be playing it up for all it's worth.

Re:7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (1)

Calavar (1587721) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745022)

True, but it doesn't mean the earthquake isn't severe. The Northridge earthquake was "only" 6.7.

Re:7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (1)

Thorfinn.au (1140205) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745322)

The Christchurch quake was 6.2

Re:7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (1)

robthebloke (1308483) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745518)

The Blackpool quake was 2.2

Re:7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745092)

Richters scale is not a log10 scale, so it's (10^1.8)^(3/2) ~= 500 times less powerful.

Re:7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (1)

kabloom (755503) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745276)

If they're using a logarithmic scale, there must be a reason why the logarithmic scale makes more sense. Maybe it's because the damage or perceived power scales logarithmically with the energy of the quake?

Re:7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (1)

_0xd0ad (1974778) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745444)

It's probably some sort of polynomial relation - energy being converted into motion of land mass in 3D, causing both horizontal and vertical motion, and the actual damage being related in some other polynomial way to the intensity of the shaking (complex, because you get shear forces in the horizontal combined with tensile and compressive forces in the vertical, and building materials act very differently under shear/compression/tension). And of course not to mention the fact that the damage is greatly dependent on how well the stuff was engineered in the first place. How well or poorly the logarithmic scale represents that complex relationship is sort of anyone's guess.

Re:7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (1)

zevans (101778) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745578)

I've been meaning to ask this for a while: is this somehow deduced at the epicentre or does it reflect the level of damage / energy transferred / work done over some wider area?

Is a 7.4 in one city likely to cause the same problems as a 7.4 in another? (Say one on clay and one on basalt?)

Re:7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (2)

pclminion (145572) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745398)

So you're talking about blowing up a Volkswagon with a cluster bomb instead of a nuclear warhead. The car is still destroyed afterward. If the 7.4 had happened without a preceding 9.2 people would be talking about the 6.6 aftershocks being "not even close" to the 7.4... People, all of these are really big earthquakes.

Re:7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745402)

Make that 7.1, according to the USGS.

Re:7.4 != 9.2 Not even close. (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745548)

It sort of depends on what you're measuring when using vague terms like "powerful": maximum ground acceleration, averaged ground acceleration and duration, maximum displacement (instrumental or in the fault plane), total energy released, etc. There are all sorts of details when trying to compare earthquakes. For energy released, the relationship is 10^1.5 or ~32x for each Richter magnitude step, although Richter magnitude isn't used as much anymore. Usually scientists use moment magnitude [wikipedia.org] these days, which has the same relationship to energy. It makes sense that energy would equate to what you feel and how much damage occurs, but there are additional effects depending on the exact way the ground is displaced, what happens as the waves propagate from the focus to the place you are experiencing the quake, duration, frequency content, ground properties, etc.

But by any qualitative measure anything over 7 (on either scale) is a big, potentially-damaging quake. Fortunately this one was off the coast like before, and the effects diminish with distance, so the cities in Japan won't experience as severe effects as the magnitude would imply if it were directly beneath the city. To put things in perspective, the 1995 Kobe [wikipedia.org] earthquake was "only" a 6.8 on the moment magnitude scale, and "only" 7.3 on the JMA scale -- i.e. smaller than this aftershock. Yet in the 1995 quake more than 6000 people were killed. So, yeah, this is a *big* earthquake, but further away from where people are living, thank goodness. That also puts the previous 8.9-9.2 quake in perspective (i.e.: it was FREAKING HUGE).

Where did 9.2 come from? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745554)

I only heard 9.0 for the Japan earthquake. Did they officially upgrade it? If so, please update the wikipedia page.

If not, where did the number come from.

Also: 9.3 != 7.4
In case you did not know.

Also in Mexico (4, Informative)

f1vlad (1253784) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744936)

https://twitter.com/#!/DanielnTexas/status/56007743731015680 [twitter.com]

Magnitude 6.5 - VERACRUZ, MEXICO http://goo.gl/b591M [goo.gl]

Re:Also in Mexico (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745190)

  And elsewhere [globalincidentmap.com] , but nothing quite as large and near the surface as Japan.

California, Pacific NW are next (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745206)

The ring of fire has been clobbering everyone except the US. Indonesia, Chile, Japan all hit with 8s and 9s in the last few years. Strain is accumulating west of N. America. Very soon the west coast of the US is going to get nailed hard. It's been 47 years since N. America got hit by anything really big; Alaska's 9.2 in 1962.

Nine point two.

The clock is ticking.

Re:California, Pacific NW are next (1)

Thorfinn.au (1140205) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745342)

So the 6.7 and the 4 * 5 that have hit Indonesia this week are not significant

time to buy land in NV near the CA border (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745348)

time to buy land in NV near the CA border. beach side casinos.

Re:time to buy land in NV near the CA border (1)

dynamic_cast (250615) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745592)

You've been watching to much Superman.

Re:California, Pacific NW are next (1)

228e2 (934443) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745362)

Yea, what the hell is up with America always getting a pass?!? Can they at least get a city destroying hurricane every now and then?

oh wait . . .

Re:California, Pacific NW are next (1)

MightyMartian (840721) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745502)

Goddamn you, Lex Luthor!

milking the cow (1)

iinlane (948356) | more than 3 years ago | (#35744956)

It's roughly 100 times less energetic, not a big deal for Japan.

Actually there were two 7.4 within a minute (2, Informative)

McNihil (612243) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745042)

14:32:41 & 14:32:00

about 100km apart (caveat not so good at spherical trig in head calculations)

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/region/Asia_eqs.php [usgs.gov]

Re:Actually there were two 7.4 within a minute (1)

sydneyfong (410107) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745124)

One of them 4.7

Re:Actually there were two 7.4 within a minute (1)

McNihil (612243) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745162)

Oh they reclassified one of them. Makes sense.

Re:Actually there were two 7.4 within a minute (2)

McNihil (612243) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745198)

actually they took the 14:32:00 out... hmmm... something is fishy.

Re:Actually there were two 7.4 within a minute (0)

wcrowe (94389) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745200)

So, it's a 14.8 then.

tsunami warning URL (4, Informative)

mrflash818 (226638) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745044)

http://www.jma.go.jp/en/tsunami/ [jma.go.jp]

"Occurred at 23:32 JST 07 Apr 2011
Region name Miyagi-ken Oki
Depth about 40 km
Magnitude 7.4"

Article on MercuryNews.com (4, Informative)

De Lemming (227104) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745078)

Article: Magnitude 7.4 earthquake hits off Japan coast [mercurynews.com]

Some quotes: "Officials say Thursday's quake was a 7.4-magnitude and hit 25 miles (40 kilometers) under the water and off the coast of Miyagi prefecture." "Buildings as far away as Tokyo shook for about a minute." "The Japan meteorological agency issued a tsunami warning for a wave of up to one meter." "Hundreds of aftershocks have shaken the northeast region devastated by the March 11 earthquake, but few have been stronger than 7.0."

l2type (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745098)

"Tsuanmi warning"?

C'mon...

Re:l2type (3, Funny)

Qzukk (229616) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745612)

hey, you try typing on a shaking keyboard!

maybe some good can come... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745114)

I would say that I hope this tsunami somehow cools of the nuclear reactor, but it would probably come off as cynical, so I won't say it.

Earth-Pissed Japanese in Space (1, Interesting)

Massacrifice (249974) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745134)

It's the psychological damage from repeated quakes that'll be the worse. Gaia's just rubbing salt in the japanese open flesh wound, over and over. If I'd be japanese, I'd be quite cross at this fucking planet. Cue in massive JAXA funding for moonbase in 3, 2, 1...

Re:Earth-Pissed Japanese in Space (2)

elrous0 (869638) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745344)

Maybe someone from the future is trying to sink the island before they start turning out robot armies.

Japan Meteorological Agency Website... (5, Informative)

torxim (1002344) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745222)

For near real-time info surrounding the Tsunami impact http://www.jma.go.jp/en/tsunami/ [jma.go.jp]

What's the worst that could happen? (1)

Above (100351) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745232)

I mean, it's just a little wave. It's not like a full on nuclear disaster.

the US West Coast is next (5, Insightful)

circletimessquare (444983) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745258)

it's long overdue

could take a month, could take a decade, but if you live on the US West Coast and you have not prepared for the big one, now is the time

Re:the US West Coast is next (1)

ub3r n3u7r4l1st (1388939) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745418)

Imagine all the stress that are building up on San Andreas fault as a result of the quakes across the pacific.

A mag-10 quake could be possible on the west coast.

Re:the US West Coast is next (1)

ClippyHater (638515) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745486)

I'd read that due to the type of fault in the west coast that such high-mag quakes simply won't happen (though undoubtedly they'll be severe enough to everyone who lives through them).

Re:the US West Coast is next (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745622)

Yes, long overdue, much like a certain low-budget Filipino horror film

Quick, it must be Orochi! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745262)

Someone find the sacrificial maidens

Happy Ending (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745282)

I see they didn't pay for the happy ending.

Really? BBC Twitter as your source? (4, Informative)

thomasdz (178114) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745306)

The USGS is like a million times better.
    Here's the link: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/usc0002ksa.php [usgs.gov]
and here's the Tsunami info:
    http://ptwc.weather.gov/ptwc/text.php?id=pacific.2011.04.07.143955 [weather.gov]

Re:Really? BBC Twitter as your source? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745588)

USGS is calling it a mag 7.1 not a 7.4. A significant difference. Please update the story subject line.

A Twitter feed? (1)

Red_Chaos1 (95148) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745318)

Seriously? Twitter is not news. Link an actual new site ffs. Thanks.

Re:A Twitter feed? (1)

zevans (101778) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745422)

In the UK, this is rapidly becoming the other way around. I look at newspapers and then dig around on Twitter to find out what's really happening, without the Murdoch-filter and egregious violations of NPOV.

Re:A Twitter feed? (1)

Thomas Charron (1485) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745464)

No one else had reported it yet.

Yeah, I was waiting for this (1)

jez9999 (618189) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745384)

There's bound to be some semi-major quakes in the near future as well... I've been saying they need to do something to get that nuclear material away from Fukushima rather soon. Another tsunami hitting it probably wouldn't end well.

There's a Google Gadget for that... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745454)

I recently came across a google gadget that show recent magnitude 4+ earthquakes worldwide... http://www.google.com/ig/directory?url=earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/mapplets/earthquakes.xml

The gadget gets added to your igoogle page and shows where earthquakes have occurred in the past hour on an interactive Google Map - as with any map, you can zoom scroll etc. The size of the circle implies the magnitude of the quake, and the colour, how recently it occurred - past hour in red, past day, orange and past week yellow.... click the 'Earthquake Details' link in the info window for any icon on the map to get more specific information about that particular quake

Re:There's a Google Gadget for that... (1)

TakeABow (2005428) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745624)

This is actually a pretty cool thing. I would like to see a slider to adjust the minimum magnitude value to display though.

News on /. who'da thought (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745462)

Is this a new Trend? Color me impressed, been a bit since an actual news story was on here.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/04/07/japan.quake/index.html?hpt=T1&iref=BN1

Cluster-Fukushima (3, Funny)

wcrowe (94389) | more than 3 years ago | (#35745512)

Just trying to coin a new term.

USGS Real-time Earthquakes (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35745628)

You can see where earthquakes have occurred in near realtime using the igoogle gadget:

http://www.google.com/ig/directory?url=earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/mapplets/earthquakes.xml

Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>