Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

US May Issue Terror Alerts On Facebook, Twitter

timothy posted more than 3 years ago | from the he-ain't-heavy-he's-my-big-brother dept.

Facebook 104

CWmike writes "The US government may start issuing terror alerts using Facebook and Twitter, which were thrust again in the spotlight recently as lifelines in Japan. An AP report Thursday, based on a 19-page draft of the plan that the news service obtained, said DHS is working to overhaul the current color-coded terror alert system. 'The new terror alerts would ... be published online using Facebook and Twitter 'when appropriate,' the AP reports, 'but only after federal, state and local government leaders have already been notified.' Zeus Kerravala, an analyst at the Yankee Group, said the government entrusting something as critical as terrorist alerts to Facebook and Twitter shows how important social networking sites have become to people's lives. 'There are hundreds of millions of people using Facebook and Twitter. For many of them, it's their primary communication tool,' Kerravala said. 'That means it's a great way to get information to a massive number of people. Maybe the best.'"

cancel ×

104 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Status Update: (2)

WrongSizeGlass (838941) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764106)

The US Government's status was just updated to "You're all guilty of something, just wait until we catch you!"

Re:Status Update: (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764158)

How long until people start to create Dead Pool style lists updated for the internet age?
I propose we call it FailPool.

Everyone picks 10 services/databases and the first one to get a list where all 10 were hacked, data breached, leaked, DDoS'd or pwned wins.

This service goes on my list.

Re:Status Update: (2)

ackthpt (218170) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764184)

The US Government's status was just updated to "You're all guilty of something, just wait until we catch you!"

I'll tell ya what people are guilty of, travelers and airlines - letting people carry on those huge bags which take up 2 or 3 times the volume allowed. When are they going to start enforcing that little box, the one that says linear size

Should be an alert for this sort of thing - Warning: Flight is booked with people trying to bring on suitcases disguised as carryons! Alert level: Plaid!"

Re:Status Update: (1)

meerling (1487879) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764290)

I take my absolutely can't lose stuff in carry-on for a simple reason, the time my luggage arrived 9 months and 10 days after I did.
Whenever the check-in counter person complains about my carry-on stuff, I point out that incident and they immediately shut up.

Re:Status Update: (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764942)

There is absolutely no way that your absolutely can't lose stuff takes up more space than a standard carry-on. FYI.

Re:Status Update: (2)

Abstrackt (609015) | more than 3 years ago | (#35765112)

Do you actually bring so much absolutely can't lose stuff that your carry-on doesn't fit in the sizer? If that's the case, I highly recommend you take a look at onebag.com's [onebag.com] packing list.

Re:Status Update: (1)

kdemetter (965669) | more than 3 years ago | (#35765842)

I take my "absolutely can't lose stuff " in carry-on for a simple reason, the time my luggage arrived 9 months and 10 days after I did.
Whenever the check-in counter person complains about my carry-on stuff, I point out that incident and they immediately shut up.

Now it makes sense :-)

Re:Status Update: (4, Insightful)

buchner.johannes (1139593) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764354)

The problem with terror alerts is that they are vague. Recently, the US had given out a terror alert for the EU. For the whole EU. That helps a lot. Additional text: The danger is real. Might be, but what is the alert useful for other than having a scared, paranoid population?

The danger levels of the color-coded terror alert level will never go down to low. We are supposed to be always be afraid. But here is the flaw in the logic: The danger wasn't zero before 9/11. So can we have a "no elevated danger" level when the danger is at that background level and specific alerts otherwise.

And please, someone give those people a link to Schneiers blog. I'm sure the specialists are aware of the security issues, but somewhere between them and the notifications there is a gap of knowledge and awareness.

Oh Yeah, Spread the fear, spread the fear... (3, Insightful)

FriendlyLurker (50431) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764426)

but what is the alert useful for other than having a scared, paranoid population?

That is exactly what it is useful for [wikimedia.org] .

Re:Status Update: (2)

WrongSizeGlass (838941) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764444)

The problem with terror alerts is that they are vague.

They're vague because it's very difficult to convince everyone in the US to slowly give up their personal rights & freedoms if you're too specific. The beauty of the 'Boogeyman announcements' is that the Boogeyman could be right outside your window and you wouldn't even know it. And even if he isn't out there right this very moment he could be there the next time you go check.

Re:Status Update: (1)

Grygus (1143095) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764552)

The real value of being vague is that any specified threat would not scare everyone. By leaving it up to the individual, each person conjures up not just a boogeyman, but a personalized boogeyman that actually scares them as an individual. The best part about this is that the government can never act on the threat since it is actually a legion of different threats, all promoted by different segments of the populace as "the real problem." So instead of having the people say, "well if the [specified threat] are so bad why don't we DO something about it," you get the populace fighting over what the real threat is; it's permanent and self-sustaining without casting much doubt on authority. It's a pretty brilliant technique, as long as your main concern is retaining power and not actually making anyone's lives any better.

Re:Status Update: (1)

kdemetter (965669) | more than 3 years ago | (#35765890)

So it's based on a 'divide and conquer' technique : keep the people afraid of each other , and they leave the government alone ( and as an added bonus , the government becomes the 'protector' of all these different people, making those people believe they cannot survive without it )

Re:Status Update: (1)

BeanThere (28381) | more than 3 years ago | (#35767484)

Other than to 'keep people scared', why not use this for something that does actually have a reasonable chance of occurring and affecting a lot of people, e.g. a tsunami alert system or something.

Re:Status Update: (5, Insightful)

subreality (157447) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764910)

The problem with terror alerts is that they are vague.

Even if they gave us more specifics, there's no associated reasonable response to them.

They look sort of like DEFCON levels, but they're not. DEFCON levels signal that it's time for specific groups to perform certain actions. At DEFCON 4 intelligence guys are activated and base security goes up. At DEFCON 3 you're organizing the troops and starting to make active preparations for war. And so on.

The terror alerts are useless. Let's say they give one that's pretty specific: San Jose is now at Red for this week. Does the SJPD set up inspection checkpoints for trucks? Does ATC divert all flights from SJC to SFO? Do they deploy guards to protect the reservoirs from poisoning? Are ANY specific actions indicated? If not, then all you're going to have is random fucknuts getting scared when they see a group of more than 3 of any ethnic minority.

The dumbest display I ever saw of this was a sign at a colo data center we used indicating that we were at level Orange. They weren't doing anything differently (just the same marginally acceptable security procedures as always). But they're a security checkpoint, and terror alerts have something to do with security, so they put up a sign.

Re:Status Update: (1)

avatar139 (918375) | more than 3 years ago | (#35765832)

The problem with terror alerts is that they are vague.

Even if they gave us more specifics, there's no associated reasonable response to them.

They look sort of like DEFCON levels, but they're not. DEFCON levels signal that it's time for specific groups to perform certain actions. At DEFCON 4 intelligence guys are activated and base security goes up. At DEFCON 3 you're organizing the troops and starting to make active preparations for war. And so on.

No, there is a response that goes along with the alert levels as here in the SFBay Area, BART and other public transit agencies generally use those alerts as an excuse to close all the restrooms in their buildings in an effort to cut janitorial costs to "reasonable" levels!

Re:Status Update: (1)

jansifae (175417) | more than 3 years ago | (#35765224)

We need two terror alert levels... "Go find a helmet" and "Put on the fucking helmet"....

Re:Status Update: (1)

Mitreya (579078) | more than 3 years ago | (#35766036)

Obligatory Simpsons (Kent Brockman) quote:

The [federal] government has just issued an Orange Alert, which again means... nothing.

Re:Status Update: (1)

Leebert (1694) | more than 3 years ago | (#35766958)

The danger levels of the color-coded terror alert level will never go down to low. We are supposed to be always be afraid. But here is the flaw in the logic: The danger wasn't zero before 9/11. So can we have a "no elevated danger" level when the danger is at that background level and specific alerts otherwise.

Yes. The Homeland Security Advisory System (the pretty rainbow) is in the active process of being replaced with exactly such a system. See: http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/ntas.shtm [dhs.gov]

Re:Status Update: (1)

blair1q (305137) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764506)

But I don't think they were serious. The tweet linked to a goatse URL.

Re:Status Update: (1)

WrongSizeGlass (838941) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764524)

But I don't think they were serious. The tweet linked to a goatse URL.

That wasn't 'goatse', it was an artist's interpretation of what he sees when he watches Congress on C-SPAN.

Okay, bomb time (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764108)

....guts coming out

If it really matters... (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764128)

If it really matters, I will hear a loud noise and turn on the radio or TV to find out what caused it.

Local governments here already issue "shelter in place" alerts, and make reverse-911 calls for more common events, like non-terrorist related chemical spills and refinery flares.

Terror alerts are meaningless for just about everybody. An "increased likelyhood" that somebody from Al Qaeda is going to do something in New York? What am I supposed to do with that information in San Francisco? What am I supposed to do with it in New York even?

Useless.

Re:If it really matters... (2)

_Sprocket_ (42527) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764266)

Terror alerts are meaningless for just about everybody. An "increased likelyhood" that somebody from Al Qaeda is going to do something in New York? What am I supposed to do with that information in San Francisco? What am I supposed to do with it in New York even?

Useless.

At first I just rolled my eyes at this announcement. But now that you've put it in proper perspective, I understand how appropriate Twitter and Facebook is for this kind of thing.

Re:If it really matters... (1)

hedwards (940851) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764312)

That's a solid point. Back when I was working security, the terror alerts were somewhat useful, but for most people they're mostly a way to scare people. Perhaps if people had some idea what to do with the information it might be helpful, but as it is there's little actual benefit for most people being made aware of it.

Re:If it really matters... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764512)

Check and make sure your neighbor's not a terrist, and that nobody's lurking in the shadows. Oh, look someone over there, shoot him! Shoot him! Oh it was just some homeless man who lost his house in the real estate crash and didn't find a job. Okay no loss. Carry on citizens... But keep on the alert for terrists! :(

Pfft. Now the terrorists won't even have to fly! (1)

ackthpt (218170) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764130)

They can just call up and say "Boo!" in to the phone and watch the color code go up - it'll be their new little game, a terrorist version of Tetris - call it Terrotris.

ORANGE! (3, Insightful)

MrQuacker (1938262) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764138)

Great, so for the next ten years I can receive hourly alerts of:

"THREAT STATUS ORANGE: Someone, Somewhere, May be planning AN ATTACK AGAINST THE USA. STAY ALERT AND REPORT ALL SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY."

Re:ORANGE! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35766698)

It is amazing that I heard the threat status almost once a week since 9-11 and then it just stopped around January 2009. I am not sure what changed.

Twitfed's feed: (1)

fuzzyfuzzyfungus (1223518) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764142)

@binladen: Oh no you di-ent! #dirtybomb #WMD

I have a bad memory (1)

zill (1690130) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764154)

Did they get a chance to use green and blue yet?

I'm starting to think that we will never see those two alert levels being used.

Re:I have a bad memory (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764206)

But blue is for a general level of risk. Even if the risk level hasn't spent very long at low(green) in the past few years it pretty much has to have spent some time at 'usual' levels of risk mustn't it?

Grade inflation? Review inflation?
4/5 is the new average, so let's make 'well above average' the average for everything eh? Sounds swell.

Re:I have a bad memory (1)

meerling (1487879) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764302)

The colors are a waste of ink/electrons. I don't know anybody that can remember what they are without checking a list other than green is safe and red is deep you know what. Just do a simple number scale, people understand that without checking a chart.

Re:I have a bad memory (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764424)

For the love of God, won't someone think of the Electrons! Electrons are people too!

Re:I have a bad memory (1)

timeOday (582209) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764772)

I would prefer a probability (i.e. a scalar between 0.0 and 1.0). That way after they issue a dozen or so we can go back and determine how accurate they really are, and adjust our fear accordingly.

One of the Mediums Used (1)

WrongSizeGlass (838941) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764156)

FTS:

the government entrusting something as critical as terrorist alerts to Facebook and Twitter shows how important social networking sites have become to people's lives

Social networks could become one of the mediums used to broadcast alerts. It's not like they're going to abandon all other methods.
Gov Official: What are you doing the the 'Restricted Zone'?
Citizen: What - what happened? It's horrible!
Gov Official: Didn't you get the alert? It was all over Facebook and Twitter.
Citizen: Facebook? Twitter? There was a huge explosion and my power went out ... and my internet ... and my cell phone!
Gov Official: Sorry, it's not our fault you weren't properly prepared for alternate social networking methods.

Good (1)

geekoid (135745) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764160)

while I don't like them calling it terror alerts, having an emergency broadcast system is a good thing. Adding this along with radio and TV will only help.

Re:Good (1)

rrhal (88665) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764658)

Does that mean you'll be first on your block to "friend" Homeland Security?

Re:Good (1)

timeOday (582209) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764790)

I agree that getting the word out quickly is important in certain circumstances - but that happens automatically for all important information (and some not-so important information) these days, does it not? The media (broadly defined to including bloggers, twits, etc) have already done their job for them. If the government said there was a high probability of a terrorist attack with some specificity as to time and place, you can bet word would travel fast.

Maybe not quite fast enough for something like a tsunami warning system, but no single event could threaten the entire US on that timescale anyways.

Obama to hold town hall meeting on FB (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764162)

President Obama is also going to be holding town hall meetings on Facebook:

http://techland.time.com/2011/04/05/obama-to-host-town-hall-meeting-on-facebook/

I've said it before and been shouted down, but eventually not having FB is going to be like not being on the internet. More and more things start to require it, even if a few luddites will say, "Bah, I'll just hole up in my basement and not participate".

Re:Obama to hold town hall meeting on FB (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764866)

That just means Facebook will eventually be acquired by the government, ending our privacy fears and renewing our oppression fears.

Terror Organization at large (1)

3seas (184403) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764174)

The US government is a terror organization. They just want to use newer technology to terrorize people. TV and Fox news is old.

Re:Terror Organization at large (3, Funny)

meerling (1487879) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764308)

Fox news is not old, they make up things fresh every day!

How could this possibly go wrong? (3, Interesting)

icebike (68054) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764190)

Lets see, two hundred and fifty million friends and followers all running for cover the first time some 133t hakzor compromises the DHS accounts. Quick, better make Facebook/Twitter federally protected entities, so we can gitmo anyone posting or tweeting anything that might be mistaken for the US government.

Facebook and Twitter couldn't possibly pay the advertising bill that would bring in this many new users. Now Ma and Pa Polyester HAVE to belly up to the meat market, no more ignoring Facebook/Twitter.

Re:How could this possibly go wrong? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764270)

> Now Ma and Pa Polyester HAVE to belly up to the meat market, no more ignoring Facebook/Twitter.

They also hold presidential Town Hall meetings on Facebook.

No worries, you can access these things in other ways.

For now.

Re:How could this possibly go wrong? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764634)

No, this sounds about right. Now we can pay the alerts exactly the amount of serious attention they deserve: none.

It will go wrong when people are penalized (1)

Burz (138833) | more than 3 years ago | (#35766514)

...for not being a friend or follower of Big Brother.

Great, More Fear Mongering... (2)

Jah-Wren Ryel (80510) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764194)

More ways to keep regular people fearful and compliant. Yippee!

Anybody else see the reports about the underwear bomber that came out last week? The guy bought a ticket a to Detroit because he couldn't afford the ticket to Chicago. That's the best al qaeda's got - somebody who can't even come up with an extra $100. Meanwhile, we've spent over a trillion dollars on anti-terrorism bullshit since 9-11, and that doesn't even include the opportunity costs of things like the millions of man-hours wasted taking our shoes off at the airport.

I suppose we can expect mandatory Amber Alerts on facebook and twitter too - gotta keep those housewives terrified of strangers - nevermind the fact that practically all child molestations and abductions are committed by family and people trusted by the family (like priests, etc).

Fear Mongering...Its not just for breakfast! (1)

TiggertheMad (556308) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764230)

Yeah, you would think the government would work on actually saving lives by providing people with timely alerts about legitimately dangerous things, like...FUCKING EARTHQUAKES.

Re:Fear Mongering...Its not just for breakfast! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35765446)

Earthquake notification service https://sslearthquake.usgs.gov/ens/

Re:Great, More Fear Mongering... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35769268)

Dont worry now that ITAsoftware is part of GOOGLE, they will be able to get the best deal and find a ticket thats cheaper by $100
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/04/08/2120226/Feds-Approve-Googles-Purchase-of-ITA-Software

Ehh... (2)

Wyatt Earp (1029) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764208)

It might make sense to do it this way, a lot of people's mobile devices have Facebook and Twitter clients, so using them will let them pop the warnings up on a wide variety of devices.

Probably easier and cheaper to implement than to send text messages.

#UPDATE (1)

oldhack (1037484) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764214)

OMG! Red Alert! RED!11!!

LOL

STFU noob. Im CEREAL.

Re:#UPDATE (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764232)

STFU noob. Im SUPER CEREAL.

TFTFY

(Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.)

EAS has got to get with the times... (2)

ChePibe (882378) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764288)

I realize the issue here is alerts regarding terrorism, but the broader issue is the Emergency Alert System.

If a message ever did go out on the EAS as it stands today, I'd probably never know about it. I don't have cable TV and very rarely watch any TV over the air (thank you, Netflix, Hulu Plus, and Amazon video). I don't listen to the radio unless I happen to be in the car and without my iPod. I spend far more time on Facebook on any given day than I do plugged into any medium which uses the EAS - and I really don't spend much time at all on Facebook. Reverse 911 is a step in the right direction but I frequently leave my phone on vibrate or silent in the evenings.

While there are certainly opportunities for abuse, this is a step in the right direction. But a fairly small one.

Re:EAS has got to get with the times... (1)

thegarbz (1787294) | more than 3 years ago | (#35765020)

Oh you'd know about it alright. Just going around on your day to day activities you may notice something like the neighbours packing, the streets blocked for no reason, and that kind of garbage. As soon as the alert goes anywhere above a slight yellow tinge the headlines will run with "OMG SAVE YOURSELVES". Think the opening scenes of Independence Day where Will Smith walks out to get his newspaper and sees the entire street fleeing.

You may just be the hero we are all looking for.

Re:EAS has got to get with the times... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35765036)

maybe you would, but for the rest of us who stay home all day don't really see much sunlight.

Re:EAS has got to get with the times... (1)

thoughtlover (83833) | more than 3 years ago | (#35765442)

Aye, Reverse 911 is a good step, but for those of us who don't use Twitter or Facebook, I'd think that Slashdot would be a better place to issue one. Just try not to issue one on April Fools, because that's the only day I stay away from this time suck.

"For many of them..." (1)

sdguero (1112795) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764324)

If facebook/twitter are your "primary communication tools" you probably don't have anything important to communicate. Wait, I think I'm onto something...

Sounds great! (1)

BitHive (578094) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764330)

The more noise sources that move into the social networking sphere, the easier it is for me to filter all that shit out of my existence.

Re:Sounds great! (1)

BeanThere (28381) | more than 3 years ago | (#35767506)

Well done then. "I don't even use Facebook" is the new "I don't even own a TV".

w/e (2)

Baseclass (785652) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764336)

Sounds like they're gearing up for yet another fear mongering campaign given the fact that the fear of terrorism has all but evaporated in the general populous.

Re:w/e (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35765072)

In that case, they ought to take down some more buildings quick, before the fear evaporates altogether. Maybe they will replace Napolitano with Larry Silverstein?

'That means it's a great way to get information to (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764352)

'That means it's a great way to get information to a massive number of people. Maybe the best.'"

Also means it's great way to get PROPAGANDA to a massive number of people. Likely the best....

Terror alerts via social notworking. (1)

tqk (413719) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764410)

News for nerds, Stuff that matters.

When they learn about smoke signals, will we get a post about that too? Probably.

Sue for Opportunity Cost? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764454)

Someone should sue the US Government for wasting their time. I'm serious.

For your own security - Next up : (1)

unity100 (970058) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764474)

"Grope-a-ball' up app from TSA - a game where designated agents can grope your virtual 'assets' ....

worried... (1)

Titan1080 (1328519) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764480)

This has me concerned that I may someday be labeled a terrrorist because I refuse to use any social networking sites.

Sky writing (1)

blair1q (305137) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764494)

They should just send up biplanes to write the current terror alert status in the sky.

It'd save a lot of bandwidth. And put already-paid-for biplanes into use.

Really? Another Facebook crApplication? (1)

DaRanged (735002) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764500)

Just another thing for a Greasemonkey script or FB Purity to block/hide from view...

Move along... nothing to see... resume normality. :)

The US Govt just wants you to "like" them (1)

WarpedCore (1255156) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764514)

by clicking the "like" button under "CODE RED: TERRORISTS STRIKE".

Wow! That's shocking (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764542)

"US May Issue Terror Alerts On Facebook, Twitter"

So Facebook and Twitter are terrorist organizations?

More proof that the war on terror is bogus (1)

wealthychef (584778) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764550)

If we were really at war, could they really survive spending months designing an alert system?

Click "Like" for this Bin Laden Alert (1)

zardozap (1812430) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764576)

Seriously? Give me a break.

1984 (1)

rubycodez (864176) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764616)

Great, now we can have the national Two Minute Hate.

Just when I thought we had run out of things to emulate to a "T" in 1984, the fascist jackwads in our federal government pull something else out of their bungholes.

United States of America is (1)

makubesu (1910402) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764626)

issuing a level red terror alert. 104,225 people like this.

I was thinking more like... (1)

FFOMelchior (979131) | more than 3 years ago | (#35765672)

Terror Alert: Congress has just been destroyed by a terrorist attack.

300,000,000 people like this.

Like (1)

formfeed (703859) | more than 3 years ago | (#35769222)

Now, can I friend The Man ?

Anyone else misinterpret the title? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764652)

I read the title and I thought it was saying the US was issuing alerts that facebook and twitter were involved in terrorism. This made perfect sense to me.

Hasn't this been described before? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35764758)

Beware of unintended consequences. This is all sounding a bit too Rad Bradbury. How long before citizens are running around with their cellphone's tracking govt. declared criminals? How long before this becomes the latest reality tv entertainment?

New color code (1)

countertrolling (1585477) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764788)

Low level is plaid
then snot green,
baby shit yellow,
johansson scarlett, (the rumors are flying)
at the top... 'oh, it's paisley!'

FB Alert (1)

diggsIt (987979) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764832)

Shouldn't the government be alerting people ABOUT facebook.

Blocked Facebook Applications (2)

bmo (77928) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764850)

Let me get this straight, I choose not to pay attention to these "terror" alerts because they serve absolutely no function whatsoever except to keep people afraid, and now they want to shove it in my face on the interbutt?

Uh

No. That particular Facebook app is getting blocked the instant it shows up. I don't care what you're trying to alert me to. Even if there's a valid threat, there is fuck-all I can do about it. I lived through the fucking cold war and EBS was just as useless. If the nukes were coming, it was just a warning that you had 15 minutes to say goodbye to everyone.

Let's evaluate the ways "terrorists" can kill me:

The worst that can happen now is someone can fly a plane into a building, which isn't going to happen because the passengers are going to kill the terrorists before it happens - the old rules of "be quiet, sit down, and this will all be over peacefully" are gone.

Radiological bombs made from a bazillion fire extinguishers are a joke and a bad movie plot.

Biological weapons are difficult and require more degrees than a thermometer factory to build the equipment.

Chemical weapons are slightly less difficult to make, but are more likely to kill the terrorists in amusingly Darwinian displays of incompetence.

Ordinary bombs are a dime a dozen and they only do localized damage, and with everyone watching purchases of Ammonium Nitrate, another Oklahoma City is not going to happen.

"Poisoning the water supply" does not meaning throwing a bag of chemicals in a reservoir. It requires driving tanker trucks up to water treatment plants, hooking them up, and doing the dirty deed. It's ridiculously infeasible. This will also last about 10 seconds before someone calls 911.

And all this to be successful requires people competent enough to pull it off. As we have seen, the vast majority of suicidal terrorists are pretty dumb. This is because anyone remotely intelligent says to his/her "commander" "you want me to do what?"

Now listen to me, you benighted mockers! We're going to teach you soldiering, The world's noblest profession! When we're done with you, you'll be able to stand up and slaughter your foes like civilized men! But first, you will have to learn to march in step. And do the manual of arms without even having to think! Good soldiers don't think, they just obey! Do you suppose that if a man thought twice, he'd give his life for Queen and Country? Not bloody likely! He wouldn't go near the battlefield! One look at your foolish faces tells me that you're going to be crack troops. Ohhh him there with the five-and-a-half hat size has the makings of a bloody hero!

- Daniel Dravot

End rant.

Why the rant: Because the TSA is tits-on-a-bull useless and we've got idiots in the House who want to tie dozens of wedge issues to the fucking budget which don't even come close to trimming it and are thus shutting down the government through invented controversy. Fuck you guys. Fuck you.

--
BMO

Re:Blocked Facebook Applications (1)

Hultis (1969080) | more than 3 years ago | (#35766192)

That particular Facebook app is getting blocked the instant it shows up. I don't care what you're trying to alert me to.

Do you really think Facebook will let you do that? It would after all be "jeopardizing national safety", not to mention that the government could offer some pretty nice tax incentives to Zuckerberg who, given his amazing track record, is unlikely to reject that offer.

</tinfoil hat>

Re:Blocked Facebook Applications (1)

bmo (77928) | more than 3 years ago | (#35767910)

Probably. I thought of that as I was typing, but I had to get my vent out.

It's depressing.

--
BMO

I understand they have one obstacle left... (1)

tlambert (566799) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764886)

I understand they have one obstacle left...

How to hide the resulting concrete numbers about how many people actually give a rats ass about them or their terror alerts.

-- Terry

Remember, stay afraid. (1)

nitehawk214 (222219) | more than 3 years ago | (#35764940)

At all times must Citizens be afraid.

Color coded system (1)

kramerd (1227006) | more than 3 years ago | (#35765040)

It makes no sense to have a color-coded terror alert system when after naming a color, you then have to explain what the color means.

Just use a 10 point scale, and if it hits 7, shut down the airports. If it hits 9, we are actually in progress of having major cities under attack. Not complicated, not difficult to understand, doesn't help terrorists to know what it is.

Critical choke points? (1)

plopez (54068) | more than 3 years ago | (#35765046)

I posted something like this before. My question is, "is twitter and FB becoming critical choke points due to the amount of important information they are now carrying?"

Let's look at it. They are used not only for personal information but also by commerce, government, political parties, activist groups, whistle blowers, and now for national defense.

What happens if this reliance increases and they are attacked. Would it harm the economy, influence elections, and compromise national defense? And can we trust FB and twitter to be impartial and focused on keeping things running smoothly? Can they be trusted to not manipulate the information to their own ends?

I think the situation is getting scary. What do you think?

Peas porridge in the pot, nine days old (1)

drdrgivemethenews (1525877) | more than 3 years ago | (#35765064)

Given they have to notify all the federal, state and local authorities before FB and Tweety, I guess that means we'll get the news several days after the event.

-------

Threat levels are always orange, even on Pandora

genuine native americans offer joy alerts on earth (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35765082)

there can be only one? chosen? for what? to invent hymens (to make the monkeys jealous)? what a break for us? time for another genocide? pageant? we only need two levels of terror? cool. 1. might live? 2. probably die? that takes care of that. god is continuing to have problems helping the chosen ones holycost profitseize come true (are queers still queer)? it says in the book we must suffer & die, as only the unchosen know how to do. good thing it's poorly written fiction, & the real novel(ty) of us is only hidden (-1) by manufactured fear? so that's good.

+1 (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35765124)

Like

I don't understand (1)

Khashishi (775369) | more than 3 years ago | (#35765416)

Why doesn't the government simply get the major United States ISPs to redirect to a special warning site? That way, it would work for anyone not using Facebook.

Re:I don't understand (1)

UBfusion (1303959) | more than 3 years ago | (#35766062)

While your idea looks interesting, in fact it's the equivalent of an internet kill switch: Imagine you are browsing a news site and all of a sudden you get redirected to a warning site. All alternatives you might try to find more information about the "threat" would also redirect to the same warning site, so in effect you'd be blind and receiving information/updates only at a need-to-know basis. Would you like that?

thumbs up (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35765752)

I like this.

nice post (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35766122)

This is a great one topic and gives in depth information. Thanks you and visit here again and again.
http://www.laptopbatteriesinc.com.au/laptop-battery/dell/dell-inspiron-1520-battery

Punctuation (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35766476)

U.S. is spelled with two periods, like in the original submission title.

What?! They can't Slashdot it? (1)

JThaddeus (531998) | more than 3 years ago | (#35766784)

They should really tell us geeks first. After all, the administration wants folks to get interested in math, science, and engineering. And who better to rebuild a society but those with the brains.

Only Facebook and Twitter? (1)

Compaqt (1758360) | more than 3 years ago | (#35767100)

What about identi.ca ?

Don't geeks deserve to notified of tsunamis?

monster beats (1)

beats headphone (2037600) | more than 3 years ago | (#35768034)

i bought the monster beats [special-be...dphone.com] headphone almost 1 year and feel good, they have amazing clarity and bass. Once you have heard a song from these headphones, the other headphones will seem no good.and mainly the things:good: The Monster beats by dre [special-be...dphone.com] headphones have a stylish . comfortable design as well as exceptionally crisp audio response. Sound quality , balanced, warm mids and thumping bass. also Included are a great carrying box and a music-phone-compatible cable. cool and Striking but cannot be used without batteries.

this is the site i bought, www.special-beats-headphone.com/ and the most importent is the attractive price, hope it helps you .

End Game (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35768330)

They sure are pulling out al the stops to keep you lot properly terrified and under control. Their end game mayt be just around the corner.

Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>