Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Robot Throws First Pitch At Phillies Game

samzenpus posted more than 3 years ago | from the mecha-casey-at-bat dept.

Robotics 92

RedEaredSlider writes "The first ball at the Phillies-Brewers game will get thrown by a robot — but Roy Halladay's job is still safe. As part of an outreach program and the Phillies' 'Science Day At The Ballpark,' the University of Pennsylvania's School of Engineering and Applied Science is showcasing a robot made from a Segway and featuring an arm that acts more like a human throwing than an ordinary pitching machine. A pitching machine functions more like a gun, firing a baseball in what amounts to a straight line. But the robot has an armature connected to a hand that was specifically designed for throwing. Another thing the robot can do is identify the strike zone."

cancel ×

92 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Hrmmm... (4, Funny)

mirix (1649853) | more than 3 years ago | (#35886688)

baseball

robot

not Japan

Interesting...

Re:Hrmmm... (1)

donotlizard (1260586) | more than 3 years ago | (#35886950)

Booing a robot is so abstract.

Re:Hrmmm... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35887116)

Time to put on the retro thick eyeglasses (big black frames), go to that game and proclaim, "I was there booing robots pitching BEFORE it became mainstream!" :)

ot.. NEED AVISE (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35887244)

Okay I know it sounds gross.. but hear me out first..im 15 btw.

so my teacher let me sit at her desk cause she's cool like that and i raised my hand first. im on my period (sry TMI i know) and i have a heavy flow. i could feel the blood coming out and i didnt get a chance to change my tampon that day. so i pretended to drop my pencil and i went under the desk and i slipped on a tampon from my purse. i believe in female rights and i support breast feeding in public, etc.. so i dont see a problem with this, as long as no one else sees anything. but as i was taking out the used tampon the guy that i kinda like (who im also friends with) came over to get a sheet of looseleaf and he saw everything. i mean i shaved and everything but he saw blood running down my leg and it smelled fishy. and he told EVERYONE and he wont talk to me and people are saying that im grimy, a whore, unclassy, white trash, etc. and i dont know what to do, advice?

Re:ot.. NEED AVISE (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35887534)

Rape him

Re:ot.. NEED AVISE (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35888796)

Periods are technology?

Re:Hrmmm... (1)

davester666 (731373) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887416)

Why exactly do we need an outreach program for robots?

Are they feeling alienated or excluded from general society in some way?

If so, might I suggest that instead of trying to make them smarter and follow the 3 laws of robotics, or something like them, we pack C4 around the CPU of each robot so when they go berserk, we can remotely destroy their CPU.

I hope this will help put down the coming robot revolt.

Re:Hrmmm... (1)

KillAllNazis (1904010) | more than 3 years ago | (#35888812)

Sudden increase in roadside IEDs, mailbombs...

Re:Hrmmm... (2)

WrongSizeGlass (838941) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887208)

The Twilight Zone [tvrage.com] did it back in 1960.

Re:Hrmmm... (1)

Phoghat (1288088) | more than 3 years ago | (#35905090)

But "The Twilight Zone" has done pretty much EVERYTHING before. Robot pitchers, robot boxers, robot nannies, etc. ad infinitum.

Re:Hrmmm... (1)

homejapan (1250680) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887816)

baseball

robot

not Japan

Interesting...

Considering that the "robots = Japan" meme is bogus, there's no surprise at all.

Re:Hrmmm... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35890098)

I was surprised the Phillies fans didn't follow the robot into the parking lot after the game and beat it to pieces.

Pitching machine (4, Interesting)

vawwyakr (1992390) | more than 3 years ago | (#35886704)

So traditional pitching machines that have thrown balls just fine and are more efficient at doing so don't count? The funny thing is this is still just a purpose built arm that throws a ball sort of like a human, it can't do anything useful or anything else at all for that matter. Call me when a robot can walk out on the field and throw a ball after it finished driving itself to the ball park.

Re:Pitching machine (1)

nschubach (922175) | more than 3 years ago | (#35886778)

So traditional pitching machines that have thrown balls just fine and are more efficient at doing so don't count?

My thoughts exactly...

I went to the article expecting to see a robot walk out on the field and/or standing on it's own and throw a pitch to the strike zone.

Re:Pitching machine (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35887044)

Isn't it possible that dexterity in robotic limbs, and range and fluidity of motion, might be more useful than ambulation? It seems like the quest for a bipedal robot is a waste of time and an exercise in vanity. Wheel/tread based systems have many less points of failure, require less resources to maintain balance, and are generally more stable. They can also be designed to navigate obstacles with minimal energy for balance. Hands, however, unlike legs, allow the robot to interact with the world in a useful manner. Unless you want to kick a soccer ball around with it, robots do not need to walk.

Re:Pitching machine (1)

vawwyakr (1992390) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887128)

If this thing could do anything other than throw a ball...like say write with a pencil or type on a keyboard then I would say this thing has a point.

Re:Pitching machine (1)

nschubach (922175) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887566)

Wheel/tread based systems have many less points of failure, require less resources to maintain balance, and are generally more stable. They can also be designed to navigate obstacles with minimal energy for balance.

Or throw a ball across the plate. As you stated, wheels can be far less prone to failure and they've been using wheels to propel balls across plates for years.

This robot was clearly designed to throw balls (with a Lacrosse like attachment on the end of the arm... or what were those toys that had the long scoop like throwing tool with a ball?), but it does it in the most inefficient way. It has no hands.

Re:Pitching machine (1)

NekSnappa (803141) | more than 3 years ago | (#35892334)

It was actually more like a Jai-alai glove.

Re:Pitching machine (1)

nschubach (922175) | more than 3 years ago | (#35893082)

Yeah, I couldn't remember the name of that sport and the quick search I did didn't help me out.

Re:Pitching machine (1)

An ominous Cow art (320322) | more than 3 years ago | (#35895886)

I think it's be interesting if the machine could throw various types of pitches - sliders, curveballs,knuckleballs, etc. That would probably require a more handlike gripper.

Not the same. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35886992)

So traditional pitching machines that have thrown balls just fine and are more efficient at doing so don't count?

No, they don't. This is closer to a human pitcher if you understand the concept of sport beyond efficiency. I.e., what can the player discern about the the coming pitch by observing the pitcher's form? How can the pitcher alter his form to mask the nature of his pitch? Etc.

Re:Pitching machine (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35888172)

I agree.

Fuck them for making people think "Hey cool, that robot threw a ball. Wonder if we could make an actual robot that can walk out and pitch. Let's fund it!"

Instead they should have used the funding they had to make a pitching robot to make a walking, talking, dancing, trash talking, pitching robot. Fuck them for trying to get more people interested in robots and also science so that they can get funding to make the robot that they originally should've made with the lack of funding they currently have.

Re:Pitching machine (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35889626)

Why on earth does it need to be built on a Segway if it has a third wheel?

Re:Pitching machine (1)

treeves (963993) | more than 3 years ago | (#35896910)

To make it more lame, of course.

Re:Pitching machine (1)

sjames (1099) | more than 3 years ago | (#35897830)

They don't really, no. They cannot throw a breaking ball. Practice with the machine until you can hit a home run with every single ball and then go face a real pitcher. He will embarrass you every time. He'll do that through a combination of aerodynamic effects from spinning the ball and by tricking you into thinking he threw it faster or slower than he actually did. A proper arm robot has some chance of managing that.

Of course, the robot still won't be able to choose pitches strategically based on sizing up the batter.

Re:Pitching machine (1)

sjames (1099) | more than 3 years ago | (#35898006)

replying to self, I just watched the video, and that robot will never strike anyone out.

Oh well.

No, make robot football players. (1)

olsmeister (1488789) | more than 3 years ago | (#35886710)

That way, we might get to see a few NFL games this fall. (and not one that looks like that dorky Fox NFL robot)

Re:No, make robot football players. (1)

antifoidulus (807088) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887134)

We already have robots that can play football [youtube.com]

Prior art? (1)

Formalin (1945560) | more than 3 years ago | (#35886756)

First thing that came to mind: Base Wars [wikipedia.org]

(I thought it was a horrible game, but I had a friend that played it far too much)

Set in a 24th century wherein baseball team owners have grown tired of paying outrageous player salaries, they decide to replace their rosters with robots.

Not a bad idea, really...

It throws like a girl... (1)

Doogman (30146) | more than 3 years ago | (#35886760)

And the crowd rightfully booed. News for Nerds? Not... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/20/robot-throw-first-pitch-phillies_n_851732.html [huffingtonpost.com]

Re:It throws like a girl... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35886924)

A colossal disappointment. The robot is designed only to throw overhead. There isn't even any horizontal rotational component (like how a real pitcher's trunk would twist) and it still couldn't even get the ball over the plate.

The crowd would've got more kicks if the ball had been tossed(successfully over the plate, I may add) by a catapult made from 2x4's, lawnmower wheels, and a couple springs.

That "engineering" team should hang their heads in disgrace for using a segway, and then commit seppuku for using Steve Jobs' arm for their kinematic model.

Re:It throws like a girl... (2)

AndersOSU (873247) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887082)

Philadelphia fans ...
They boo Santa Claus [snopes.com]

But I'll admit, that was a pretty sad pitch.

Plus high standards at Citizen's Bank Park

Re:It throws like a girl... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35887638)

Read the whole story in your link and tell me you would be all giddy to see santa in that situation. The santa that was supposed to be there got held up and they pulled a random 20-year-old dude out of the crowd with a red corduroy suit on. He wasn't even fat. Naturally he was pelted with snowballs.

43 years ago, btw.

Re:It throws like a girl... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35890754)

That's an insult to girls around the planets.

Tell me, is it normal that the "first pitch" is something showy like this?
If so, is it commonly done this pathetic? This is an honest question, I've never attended or even seen a game so I really wouldn't know.

Gotta hand it to the robot operator though. Knowing how that thing burps forth a ball and still going out on central stage in a stadium packed with people... man you either have no sense or some serious balls.

Re:It throws like a girl... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35893104)

Robota forgot to ask for the strike zone not to be in shot like the great Barack Hussein Obama did

Wow, somebody finally found a use for a Segway! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35886800)

Besides the mall cops and urban postal workers, that is.

Weren't they supposed to change the world? I guess they did...now.

Re:Wow, somebody finally found a use for a Segway! (1)

Miseph (979059) | more than 3 years ago | (#35888624)

And Gob Bluth.

pitching line (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35886826)

It had a good day

33 blerns/0.03 blerns per blern/0.345 xBlerns in 8.3 blerns pitched

Video (1, Informative)

buttersnout (832768) | more than 3 years ago | (#35886856)

Youtube link (4, Informative)

zanian (1621285) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887034)

video was unavailable. This worked though:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShId-vZ-ZEY [youtube.com]

Re:Youtube link (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35892104)

Is no one going to mention how bad of a job it did? They have all the time in the world to get it right and only need 60 ft to test with. Very embarrassing for the Penn engineering team.

Re:Youtube link (1)

moonbender (547943) | more than 3 years ago | (#35893096)

Well that was hopefully the lamest thing I'll see all day.

Re:Youtube link (1)

zanian (1621285) | more than 3 years ago | (#35895570)

Well that was hopefully the lamest thing I'll see all day.

ya, I hesitated posting the link.

Oh, great. (5, Funny)

Black Parrot (19622) | more than 3 years ago | (#35886884)

Now we're replacing politicians with soulless automatons?

Re:Oh, great. (2)

MokuMokuRyoushi (1701196) | more than 3 years ago | (#35886944)

Now we're replacing soulless automatons with soulless automatons?

FTFY.

Re:Oh, great. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35886958)

I'm glad you clarified that. I wouldn't have gotten the joke otherwise.

Re:Oh, great. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35894488)

THAT'S THE JOKE

Re:Oh, great. (1)

treeves (963993) | more than 3 years ago | (#35896968)

But robots are not greedy, deceptive, addiction-prone and power-hungry. Thus it is a major upgrade.

Re:Oh, great. (1)

XxtraLarGe (551297) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887408)

I was about to make some joke about how the robot did a better job than Barack Obama did last year, but it turned out to not be the case. Obama's pitch [youtube.com] wasn't anywhere near the strike-zone, but at least he made it to the plate. Although when it comes to throwing out the first pitch, Barack Obama is not George W. Bush. [youtube.com] I did not vote for either one of them, just giving credit where credit is due.

Re:Oh, great. (1)

treeves (963993) | more than 3 years ago | (#35897000)

Couldn't have been worse than when we went bowling somewhere in the midwest during his election campaign. I think he bowled a game in the 50s or 60s. It's hard to do that badly.

Re:Oh, great. (1)

treeves (963993) | more than 3 years ago | (#35897020)

"we went bowling" should have been "he went bowling".

Oh crap (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35886930)

Skynet's taking over already!

like a human ? you mean like a trebuchet ? (2, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35886954)

This does not attempt to throw like a human. Watch the video.

Science day yields a trebuchet with a remote control.

Re:like a human ? you mean like a trebuchet ? (1)

Dominare (856385) | more than 3 years ago | (#35886988)

Yes, but it still threw a slightly better pitch than Mariah Carey, so that was alright.

Re:like a human ? you mean like a trebuchet ? (1)

Vectronic (1221470) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887056)

Slightly [youtube.com] indeed... although the Mariah Carey is a bit more advanced, since it only needs to be guided by men in giant costumes, not directly controlled.

The Replicants (1)

cosm (1072588) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887026)

Next I hope they replace the players with robots. And then they could replace the umpires as well. And then they could replace the sportscasters. I am pretty sure all of those jobs could be performed by autonomous machines.

Then replace the audience with robots.

And then nuke the whole ensemble from orbit, and our baseball problem will be solved!

Oh..whats that you say...it wasn't a problem...?...I just really despise this sport. I am pretty sure you could write baseball AI in a couple lines.

while(FansNotBored)
{
If (IHaveBall)
ThrowBall();
else
StandStill();
}

Re:The Replicants (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35887138)

If (IHaveBall)
ThrowBall();

Not really a good strategy if you're the catcher and somebody's trying to steal home.

Re:The Replicants (1)

by (1706743) (1706744) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887422)

...I just really despise this sport. I am pretty sure you could write baseball AI in a couple lines. while(FansNotBored)
{
If (IHaveBall)
ThrowBall();
else
StandStill();
}

If baseball is so easy, then why are you posting on /. instead of, oh I don't know, raking in millions of dollars with the Yankees?

And in case you claim that human's aren't fast enough to efficiently execute your algorithm, I think that's rubbish: Evaluating whether or not the fans are bored can be easily checked by just having your coach yell at you (a callback method, if you will...nyuk nyuk). Evaluating whether or not you have the ball is trivial. Throwing the ball takes no arguments, and I assume you're a sophisticated enough coder to avoid excessive globals. Assuming you're decently coordinated, you should be able to throw the ball several hundred feet [wikipedia.org] which, if you're playing infield, shouldn't be a problem. And standing still is, of course, trivial.

Just because you don't understand the game doesn't make it trivial. I realize your comment was somewhat in jest, but I find such animosity towards something which causes you no harm rather, well, silly (kind of like this reply). I mean, to the untrained eye, a programmer does the following:

while (atWork) {
if (butt_itches) scratchIt();
if (now() - most_recent_burp > fifteen_minutes) drinkSoda();
swearAtComputer();
if (feelingUnderweight) orderPizza();
}

Re:The Replicants (2)

cosm (1072588) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887468)

Twas satire, but your contention raises valid points. It is a very difficult sport, and I apologize if I offended any players. Those offended will have plenty of time to reflect over these comments during each inning and between lulls in the action.

Re:The Replicants (1)

PPH (736903) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887436)

You'll need to add an interrupt handler to call ScratchMyBalls() occasionally or this won't replace human pitchers.

Re:The Replicants (1)

Culture20 (968837) | more than 3 years ago | (#35889222)

You forgot const Boolean FansNotBored=false;
while !(*FansNotBuzzed)
{servebeer(FansNotBuzzed);
}

Blernsball (1)

uofitorn (804157) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887072)

Boring? Baseball wasn't... hmm, so they finally jazzed it up? Multiball! http://theinfosphere.org/Blernsball [theinfosphere.org]

Re:Blernsball (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35905700)

BENDER
Clem Johnson? That skin bag wouldn't have lasted one pitch in the old Robot Leagues! Now Wireless Joe Jackson, there was a blern hitting machine!

LEELA
Exactly! He was a machine designed to hit blerns! I mean, come on, Wireless Joe was nothing but a programmable bat on wheels.

BENDER
Oh, and I suppose Pitchomat 5000 was just a modified howitzer?

the 3rd wheel? (1)

societyofrobots (1396043) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887076)

I like how they used a Segway, then added a 3rd wheel to it.

Re:the 3rd wheel? (1)

MightyYar (622222) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887332)

In the Ivy League, they call the training wheel "daddy".

Identify the strike zone? (1)

imadork (226897) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887084)

That makes him better than all the Mets human pitchers. They should sign him!

- sad Mets fan

Re:Identify the strike zone? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35887164)

That makes him better than all the Mets human pitchers. They should sign him!

- sad Mets fan

Gotta wonder - how many of those machines could Oliver Perez pay for?

Re:Identify the strike zone? (1)

WuphonsReach (684551) | more than 3 years ago | (#35898484)

Fellow sad Mets fan.

I was at the Thursday double-header the other week and was highly amused by the fan attempting to start a "Bernie Madoff" chant.

Maybe the Wilpons will be forced to sell...

The Doc (1)

SlashJoel (1145871) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887136)

Seriously, though...Roy Halladay is a machine!

Re:The Doc (1)

Krau Ming (1620473) | more than 3 years ago | (#35895680)

but he has flesh and blood over top of the robot skeleton...that's more like a terminator...

Story/Video was better yesterday (1)

jeko (179919) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887200)

"Cannon throws first pitch at game; Catcher still in critical condition."

Hmmm! (3)

b4upoo (166390) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887206)

Way back in 1959 I worked as a teen in a batting cage. The machines actually did throw much as a human does with an elbow and forearm type of mechanism. It was very realistic as no two balls would ever leave the gutter shaped hand the same way due to starting with the balls laces in different positions. So you could get dusted off or even hit by a ball and curves and balls slightly high or low were also thrown. We had three machines. One was little league speed. One for minor league and the final machine was set up to act like a pro pitcher in the world series. Actually I believe that machine was throwing just a bit faster than any pro pitcher could throw although it was supposedly identical to a hot, fast ball. That machine was actually a bit frightening. A mistake in that cage just might get you hurt. The New York Yankees team members used to drop by and smack balls around. They really do hit balls further than normal people can. I know as I was the kid that had to pick up the balls and we had a full size ball field to cover. At night it took some skill not to be slaughtered by a line drive while gathering balls. Keep in mind that there were three batters firing at me. Those days were pre OSHA and I suppose I was taking on a serious risk. Life was different back then.

Bender (1)

residieu (577863) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887266)

Oh, and I suppose pitch-o-mat 5000 was just a modified howitzer.

Ran out of time? (1)

pz (113803) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887284)

It's great that the Phillies sponsored a Science Day at the ballpark.

And the robot is a pretty cool part of that -- but given that the pitch didn't get even close to being over the plate, I wonder if the students working on the project ran out of time to get things working well for the demo?

Re:Ran out of time? (1)

Beezlebub33 (1220368) | more than 3 years ago | (#35892012)

No, the pitch could have been much, much faster. If they had a real catcher there, it would have made sense for them to send one in there pretty fast. But they had the stupid mascot there, who can't see very well, and so had to dial it down. See discussion at PCMag [pcmag.com] . There are numerous arm pitching machines that can throw ~100 mpg, though not as many as the wheel-based ones.

They would be better utilized as umpires (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35887300)

Baseball is losing its fan base for many reasons. One being that the strike zone is not called according to the rule book, but according to the whims of the umpires.

Baseball also needs a pitch clock and instant replay. Too many calls at first and second base(player off the bag turning a double play) are wrong.

What?!?! (1)

Troke (1612099) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887334)

Now we allow them to throw projectiles?!?! Looks like I'll be purchasing my EMP weapon earlier than I thought.

http://www.fullmalls.com (-1, Offtopic)

xiaojiekytt (2053178) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887344)

Click on our website: ( http://www.fullmalls.com/ [fullmalls.com] ) Website wholesale various fashion shoes, such as Nike, Jordan, prada, also includes the jeans, shirt, bags, hats and decoration. Personality manufacturing execution systems (Mes) clothing, Grab an eye bag coat + tide bag Air jordan(1-24)shoes $30 Handbags(Coach l v f e n d i d&g) $35 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $15Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,A r m a i n i) $15 New era cap $12 Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $20accept paypal and free shipping ( http://www.fullmalls.com/ [fullmalls.com] )

and so it begins (1)

TheRealQuestor (1750940) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887398)

1st they learn to toss a ball, next thing you know they are tossing nukes. This can not end well.

Pfffft (1)

Tablizer (95088) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887540)

throws like a girl robot

Sure, but... (1)

Digital Vomit (891734) | more than 3 years ago | (#35887652)

Robot Throws First Pitch At Phillies Game

Sure, but can it love?

check this out instead (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35888014)

The throw motion of this robot is ridiculously disappointing. At the very least, it should at least move the base at a higher speed like this japanese robot:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sP4ZUCt5WvA

Obligatory Geoff (1)

ewe2 (47163) | more than 3 years ago | (#35888788)

Balls!

Am I... (1)

keith_nt4 (612247) | more than 3 years ago | (#35889552)

the only one who only thought of the "modified howitzer" line in the one futurama episode?

You don't have ball throwing machines? (1)

MichaelSmith (789609) | more than 3 years ago | (#35890418)

The local cricket club has a machine for pitching cricket balls. You drop a ball in a hole at the back and it flies out a hole on the other side. I assume it gets squished between two rotating wheels. Don't they use these in base ball?

Re:You don't have ball throwing machines? (1)

kannibal_klown (531544) | more than 3 years ago | (#35892252)

The local cricket club has a machine for pitching cricket balls. You drop a ball in a hole at the back and it flies out a hole on the other side. I assume it gets squished between two rotating wheels. Don't they use these in base ball?

We do, but as mentioned in the summary this was supposedly more like an arm throwing a ball that a gun-type device firing a ball.

Same result, but 2 different ways going about it.

The gun-type device (that we use for batting practice) is probably more efficient and easier to fix / maintain.

This is closer to what a thrown ball behaves and I guess serves as a decent little experiment in trying to replicate human actions in similar ways. The wind-up, the pitch, trying to hit the strike zone, etc. In the end it's not *that* fascinating, but it's still "news for nerds."

Next stop: SkyNet and a bunch of Terminators running around throwing baseballs.

Re:You don't have ball throwing machines? (1)

MichaelSmith (789609) | more than 3 years ago | (#35892412)

Cricket balls would do more damage ;)

I guess... (1)

CTU (1844100) | more than 3 years ago | (#35890724)

I have been playing to much portal 2 as when I first read the summery I read "Applied Science" as "Aperture Science"
but the idea of using a robot was interesting...how soon till we have a robot baseball league?

Meh (1)

Gerocrack (979018) | more than 3 years ago | (#35892874)

Now, if the title was "Robot Throws First PUNCH At Phillies Game", we'd have a real story on our hands.

Dalek Baseball (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35895542)

I was sleepy when I saw this on TV news this morning and for a minute it looked like a Dalek throwing the ball to the Philly Phanatic.

Meh (1)

sevenbit (2067116) | more than 3 years ago | (#35926682)

Cool
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?