Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Stamping Out Low-Cost Nanodevices

timothy posted more than 3 years ago | from the yank-the-crank dept.

Science 24

RogerRoast writes "Vanderbilt University scientists report that they have developed a simple technique for stamping patterns invisible to the human eye onto a special class of nanomaterials. According to the article, the method works with materials that are riddled with tiny voids that give them unique optical, electrical, chemical and mechanical properties. 'It's amazing how easy it is. We made our first imprint using a regular tabletop vise,' Sharon M. Weiss the lead author said. The article was published in the latest issue of the journal Nano Letters."

cancel ×

24 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Stamping them out (2)

Megane (129182) | more than 3 years ago | (#36306586)

I prefer to stamp them out with the sole of my shoe,

Nasty little nanodevices, always getting under the baseboards. Good riddance.

Getting rid of? (2)

j-beda (85386) | more than 3 years ago | (#36306594)

The title made me think it would be about a way of getting rid of unwanted nanodevices in the environment - maybe some sort of vacuum combined with a filter. Stephenson's "The Diamond Age" has the problems of unwanted nano-machines as one of its themes.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Neal_Stephenson [wikimedia.org]

Re:Getting rid of? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36307050)

Shouldn't nanodevices be susceptible to static electricity? It should make them cling and (potentially) fry electronics.
Pun intended?

Replacing Pigment Coatings? (1)

BrightSpark (1578977) | more than 3 years ago | (#36306626)

It will be interesting to see if nano-suface treatment to give colour and patterns will one day be able to replace traditional pigment coatings where the coating is purely cosmetic. Time will tell.

Re:Replacing Pigment Coatings? (1)

vegiVamp (518171) | more than 3 years ago | (#36307704)

Even, maybe especially, if the coating is purely cosmetic, there is bound to be a market of people who want to change their mind all the time.

If the nanocoating has a high enough refresh time, though, imagine a world where any surface can be used as a screen. The possibilities are endless. Unfortunately the marketeers will think exactly the same thing.

Re:Replacing Pigment Coatings? (2)

Hylandr (813770) | more than 3 years ago | (#36308508)

I want nano devices with teleporters to hang out in my intestines, transporting in food where it needs to go, and down lower, transporting the results out. These same nano bots can clean my house and maintain my engine at the microscopic level. Working together they could manage my lawn and keep it precisely 3 inches and transport water in as needed. For that matter, with enough of them, we could live in nanite-buildings.

I see all this coming to a hysterical end the first time someone cracks the system though. That couldn't happen could it?

*Ducks*

- Dan.

Re:Replacing Pigment Coatings? (1)

vegiVamp (518171) | more than 3 years ago | (#36308838)

While I like the idea of transporting the end result of feeding out of my body, I damn well wouldn't want to miss the pleasures of eating.

Diamond Age (1)

mangu (126918) | more than 3 years ago | (#36311132)

imagine a world where any surface can be used as a screen. The possibilities are endless. Unfortunately the marketeers will think exactly the same thing.

Neal Stephenson already mentioned this in his SF novel "Diamond Age". The end result when every surface was coated with marketing animations was that nothing stood out, so no one noticed anything. Call it the "Geocities effect" or, better, the "Altavista effect".

Perhaps many don't remember it, but before Google the main search site was Altavista. Its home page was loaded with ads, every one trying to catch your attention with the most obnoxious animation effect. Then Google came with its clean home page and the rest is history.

Wet-embossing? (2)

Gibbs-Duhem (1058152) | more than 3 years ago | (#36306630)

Hopefully someone who is on an academic IP address can explain why this is any different than the standard wet-embossing techniques that we've been using to do this kind of thing for the last decade and a half... those SEM images sure look awfully similar to the stuff I was doing back in 2001. Maybe they're just saying that they crush the porous substrate whereas with standard techniques we suck up solvents in substrate inks? That would be kind of neat, although it seems like it'd be limited in utility so I imagine it's more clever than that... do they crush some porous substrate and then manage to lift off the pattern or otherwise remove the crushed portion? Do they have a technique to deposit different substrates on the same device? Otherwise, it's not really going to be useful for most electronics right? I mean, making a pattern of n-type silicon isn't going to make a useful device unless you can deposit p-type and conductor on the same device and manage high degrees of alignment... maybe they mean that this can be used as memory? DIffraction gratings by themselves are rather boring...

A shame that the article doesn't say what the substrates actually are. I do like the photos of the little tubes, although without a scale bar I'm not sure what I'm looking at.

Re:Wet-embossing? (2)

gr8_phk (621180) | more than 3 years ago | (#36306734)

DIffraction gratings by themselves are rather boring...

And CDs have been stamped since the 1980s.

Re:Wet-embossing? (1)

certron (57841) | more than 3 years ago | (#36313068)

There is an IBM patent on nano-stamping (which I can't seem to locate due to all the other IBM and stamping patents) which describes a technique developed after noticing that very small errors were being reproduced from the CD plate repeatably in the final produced CDs. I was reading this article at least 8 years ago.

Re:Wet-embossing? (3, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36307234)

It's nanoimprint lithography ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanoimprint_lithography ), but replacing the polymer normally used to record the pattern with a porous material that is crushed.

The images show various materials - (1) is porous gold, with a feature pitch of 750 nm; (2) is porous silicon with a pitch of 400 nm; (3) is porous titanium dioxide, with the distance from the bottom of the pictures to the start of the pores about 1 micron; (4) isn't in the paper; and (5) is porous silicon with the cube side about 2 microns.

The substrates (under the porous films) aren't entirely clear from the paper but seem to have been silicon for the silicon, glass or silicon for the gold, and titanium for the TiO2. They also had Al2O3 on Al.

Nano Letters ? (3, Funny)

giorgist (1208992) | more than 3 years ago | (#36306638)

"The article was published in the latest issue of the journal Nano Letters"

It's one thing not to be able to see the patterns created ... but to post in nano letters is a bit arogant me thinks !!

Survey says... (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36306798)

You're an idiot!

Nano-Tattoos? (1)

ForgedArtificer (1777038) | more than 3 years ago | (#36307164)

Painless and self-renewing (or maybe reprogrammable!) nano-tattoos coming soon to flesh near you?

It's certainly been a staple of cyberpunk.

Re:Nano-Tattoos? (3, Interesting)

Agent0013 (828350) | more than 3 years ago | (#36309152)

Painless and self-renewing (or maybe reprogrammable!) nano-tattoos coming soon to flesh near you?

It's certainly been a staple of cyberpunk.

It's already here. Think geek has a wand that changes an e-Ink tatoo [thinkgeek.com] to a new picture.

Re:Nano-Tattoos? (1)

gstoddart (321705) | more than 3 years ago | (#36309158)

Painless and self-renewing (or maybe reprogrammable!) nano-tattoos coming soon to flesh near you?

As someone who has been tattooed multiple times ... I'm against giving people a pain-free way to get one.

If they were painless, every whiny 16 year old would have full sleeves and back pieces like they were something easy to get.

They're supposed to hurt, dammit. The pain keeps out the wannabes. ;-)

(And, believe me, I've heard 18 year old girls getting *tiny* tattoos screeching like they're being mauled by a bear -- apparently, they didn't realize it would hurt and almost stopped after the outline.)

Re:Nano-Tattoos? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36309838)

They're supposed to hurt, dammit. The pain keeps out the wannabes. ;-)

I assure you that it does not. You're against painless tattoos because they would shatter the fragile illusion that having them makes you a badass.

Re:Nano-Tattoos? (1)

gstoddart (321705) | more than 3 years ago | (#36310078)

I assure you that it does not. You're against painless tattoos because they would shatter the fragile illusion that having them makes you a badass.

LOL ... I have no such illusion that I'm a badass. I'm a pasty white geek in my 40's, and at no point in time have I considered myself that. I was a geek before it was popular.

But, in the end, a "short cut" to getting a tattoo kinda circumvents the whole process, and it just means that everyone will run out for them -- though, admittedly, that re-programmable e-ink thing actually needs to be put in by a plastic surgeon.

Still, I will stick with the way tattoos are usually done -- I put a lot more meaning on something I had to sit through for several hours than I would something I can change to a fresh bitmap when I was bored.

Re:Nano-Tattoos? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36311812)

You know that product is fake right?

Also:

"LOL ... I have no such illusion that I'm a badass. ... I was a geek before it was popular."

Yeah, ok. I think we get where your smug self image is taking you. Congrats, you bad ass tattooed wearing geek!

Re:Nano-Tattoos? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36310412)

They're supposed to hurt, dammit. The pain keeps out the wannabes. ;-)

I assure you that it does not. You're against painless tattoos because they would shatter the fragile illusion that having them makes you a badass.

upvote please. i hate these douchebags who are so keen on getting tattoos and then shoving it in our faces. keep your barbaric practices to yourselves ya cunts

Nano Letters? (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36307358)

"I walked into the room, and he was sitting on the bed, waiting for me. My every desire was to interface my nanite cortex into his receptacle beacon. Things started to heat up, he slid off my outer layers, I recharged his core and we were one. Until I heard a noise at the door, who could that be I wondered? It was Sheila, that freshly stamped tramp of an ex girlfriend...."

Re:Nano Letters? (1)

Gilmoure (18428) | more than 3 years ago | (#36307792)

I never thought it would happen to me...

I, for one... (1)

NotSanguine (1917456) | more than 3 years ago | (#36310424)

Welcome our new nano-overlords!
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?