Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

LulzSec Phone-Bombs FBI and Blizzard

samzenpus posted more than 3 years ago | from the poking-the-bear dept.

Security 404

Revotron writes "Anonymous hacker group LulzSec has begun to harness the power of the crowd in their latest griefing attempts. After a day of numerous DDoS attacks on a handful of famous MMOs, LulzSec's phone lines lit up with an estimated 20 calls per second. Using a fairly simple phone redirect, they sent all of their incoming calls to various offices, among them the FBI office in Detroit, Blizzard Customer Support, online retailer Magnets.com, and most recently, the corporate offices of HBGary." Update: It looks like they also brought down the CIA website tonight, but it is up now.

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Balls of steel (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455724)

They've got balls of steel.

Re:Balls of steel (5, Insightful)

enderjsv (1128541) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455774)

Doesn't take much courage to throw a rock into a window when you're wearing a ski mask and there's no one around.

Re:Balls of steel (3, Informative)

mykos (1627575) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455806)

They're here to kick ass and chew bubblegum, and they're all out of gum.

Re:Balls of steel (1)

jhoegl (638955) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455892)

Winner of Most used cliche for advocating violence.

Re:Balls of steel (0)

Gwala (309968) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456360)

*whooosh*

Re:Balls of steel (1)

Jeremiah Cornelius (137) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456020)

Now they crashed Twitter.

Re:Balls of steel (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456066)

And nothing of value ...

Re:Balls of steel (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455820)

Yeah, they're just looking for attention. The best thing to do media-wise is to ignore them, otherwise they'll just continue with their temper tantrum since they're getting what they want that way.

Re:Balls of steel (4, Insightful)

OverlordQ (264228) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455822)

Being behind a ski mask (7 proxies) doesn't really mean much unless you're outside the country, what with all the taps the NSA have, I'm sure if they wanted them gone it wouldn't take much.

Re:Balls of steel (1)

enderjsv (1128541) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455840)

I guess "outside the country" would be covered by "no one's around". Too vague? :)

Re:Balls of steel (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456088)

Very true, it is most likely being done by some government entity as a way to pass legislation to stranglehold our freedoms on internet even further.

Re:Balls of steel (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455866)

The entire FBI is on holiday?

Re:Balls of steel (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456288)

Doesn't take too much brains either, it seems. (and I'm not talking about their hacking skills)

Re:Balls of steel (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455802)

BalzSac

Re:Balls of steel (1)

Jeremiah Cornelius (137) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455980)

Honore? Touche!

Re:Balls of steel (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455816)

According to their twitter acc they have just taken down cia.gov

Re:Balls of steel (0)

DigiShaman (671371) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455906)

One might think they would eventually hack websites and servers belonging to oppressive regimes (I will purposefully not name any examples). But no, they would rather punk on the defenseless.

Re:Balls of steel (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455942)

hack websites and servers belonging to oppressive regimes

USA?

Re:Balls of steel (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456032)

But no, they would rather punk on the defenseless.

If the FB fucking I is defenseless then a lot of people need firing.

Re:Balls of steel (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456518)

Your tax dollars at work.

Skyrim needs to come out now! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455728)

This is what happens when game companies start releasing awful crap like Duke Nuke'm Forever. Script kiddies have nothing better to do

Re:Skyrim needs to come out now! (-1, Offtopic)

erroneus (253617) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456092)

Duke Nuke'm Forever isn't awful. It's "retro." You know, I still like the original Duke 3D. DNF kinda builds on it. It's pretty nice in that respect. Is it worth $60? No... $30... maybe $40...

It's pretty hard to make a cutting-edge game. The "best" ones these days have a great story over technological advancements. DNF isn't much about stories though. I seriously don't think DNF was intended to be anything like what people were expecting. Back when it was supposed to be released, it would have been considered awesome though.

Re:Skyrim needs to come out now! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456322)

Except it's not retro. If it was retro, it might be decent instead of a piece of shit. If it was retro it wouldn't have regenerating health, a two gun limit, or set piece based corridor style levels. And if it was a true throwback to the Duke era of FPSs, it would be refreshing, and fun for a little while until it ultimately reminded you of why those things kind of sucked. Instead it's just a mess, a half assed modern shooter with a half assed Duke skin thrown on it.

Re:Skyrim needs to come out now! (0)

LurkerXXX (667952) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456512)

If it had 2011 graphics pre 2000, sure...

But Duke 3D had lots of interactive items in the world. DNF, not really.

Duke 3D had lots of places to explore int he level, hidden location/treasure. DNF is really linear.

DNF is awful, not retro.

first post (2)

sneakyimp (1161443) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455734)

Doesn't this make them griefers?

Re:first post (4, Insightful)

mwvdlee (775178) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455958)

It was... "interresting" in the start.
But that has worn off long ago.
They're not doing anything intelligent or justifiable; they're just bullies out to hurt easy targets.

Re:first post (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456104)

www.cia.gov

Re:first post (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456100)

Their name is LulzSec, it was clear from the start that they were griefers.
Anyone who did not realize that needs to read up on lulz.

False flag (5, Insightful)

mykos (1627575) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455738)

I don't want to sound like a tinfoil hatter (even if I do), but something tells me that these guys are contracted by the government because supporters of the Patriot Act are thinning in numbers.

Re:False flag (0)

Zironic (1112127) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455794)

Well, it at least made me a supporter of whatever gets those assclowns thrown off the internet.

Re:False flag (2)

gnick (1211984) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455834)

Probably right - I know that when I found out that magnets.com's phones were temporarily tied up, the first thing I did was write my congress critter asking him to tap every phone in the district.

Re:False flag (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456046)

came here to post this... somethings not right here. They are doing everything possible to get arrested and nothing that makes any difference or sense.

Re:False flag (5, Insightful)

Restil (31903) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456148)

It makes perfect sense. They're children, looking for attention. And they're getting tons of it. I wouldn't go so far as to say news outlets should stop reporting on it, as that gets into censorship territory, and it IS newsworthy to a point, and yet if they knew that the only ones paying any attention to them were law enforcement, and the only reason they hadn't gotten caught yet is because they're waiting to collect enough evidence to ensure the sentences last multiple decades... maybe it would stop all on its own.

As for being out of reach, NOBODY is out of reach. Even if a country is unlikely to allow extradition, consider the fact that if some small country was causing an abnormal amount of grief for the rest of the world, surrounding allies might consider cutting off all internet access to prevent it. Just something to consider.

-Restil

Re:False flag (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456506)

came here to post this... somethings not right here. They are doing everything possible to get arrested and nothing that makes any difference or sense.

They think they're untouchable. They're going to screw up eventually and make a slip that will cause one or more of them to get caught. Then they'll find themselves dealing with people whose idea of lulz is locking them up and throwing away the key. To avoid this they'll spill their guts and start stabbing everyone else in the back in order to save their own asses.

Re:False flag (1)

Cl1mh4224rd (265427) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456204)

I don't want to sound like a tinfoil hatter [...]

"I'm not a racist, but..."

[...] but something tells me that these guys are contracted by the government because supporters of the Patriot Act are thinning in numbers.

That people may take advantage of a situation is not evidence that they are responsible, directly or indirectly, for that situation. Politicians are, if anything, opportunistic. Also, it's not like there's never been a group of assholes on the Internet making trouble for a bunch of people.

Your conspiracy theory is just empty calories.

Re:False flag (1)

mykos (1627575) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456398)

I believe this is the first time, on the internet or otherwise, that someone implied that I was racist after taking a completely unrelated statement out of context. I implore you to read more than half of my sentence.

Re:False flag (2)

X0563511 (793323) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456504)

Woosh?

Hint: he's not saying anything about racism. He's bitching about the whole "I'm not X, but..." construct.

meh (0, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455740)

Hope all those useless attention whores remember to bring lube to prison. Can't wait till they get caught. Tired of seeing that stupid name in the headlines.

Keep up the good work, crackers!! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455746)

Fu**ing magnets, how do they work?

Re:Keep up the good work, crackers!! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455874)

There MUST be a link to Sony here. Perhaps Sony secretly include mind-controlling magnets in their products?

Wankers (2, Insightful)

EQ (28372) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455772)

So screwing over WOW players trying to get customer support is now "justice"? What a bunch of wankers.

Re:Wankers (5, Insightful)

gclef (96311) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455800)

Justice? I don't think they were ever about justice. Their name says it all: they're in it for the lulz.

Re:Wankers (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456146)

Justice? I don't think they were ever about justice. Their name says it all: they're in it for the lulz.

Take it a step further: they get their lulz by being pricks. I'd say their name should be PrickSuck rather than LulzSec, but that'd be an insult to gays.

Re:Wankers (1)

Omnifarious (11933) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455838)

I do not think justice has ever been a goal. They are in it for the lulz. The way to attract their attention is to complain about what they're doing. I'm amused, but have no feeling that much of what they're doing is morally justified in any way. I will be similarly amused (and a bit impressed) if they're caught.

Re:Wankers (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456076)

I do not think justice has ever been a goal. They are in it for the lulz.

Granted that's obviously true for most of them but I'm sure that SOME members of the FBI must be interested in justice. Okay, maybe not.

Re:Wankers (5, Insightful)

bonch (38532) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455876)

Slashdot circa 1999: "Free Kevin Mitnick!"
Slashdot circa 2011: "These damn hackers are interfering with my WoW time."

Re:Wankers (2)

OverlordQ (264228) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455986)

There's a big difference between what Mitnick did and mass disruption of services

Re:Wankers (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456000)

Slashdot circa 1999: "Free Kevin Mitnick!"
Slashdot circa 2011: "These damn hackers are interfering with my WoW time."

Free Mitnick? Nah, it was more like screw Mitnick, he Social Engineered his way in.

Re:Wankers (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456174)

because in 1999 we were mostly teenage hackers, now we're computer security professionals and these kids are messing with our free time.

AFAIK Mitnick only ever really broke into networks for fun and to steal mobile phone firmware so he could explore networks more safely.. no DDoSing, no releasing credit card dumps, no messing with innocent people. What these LulzSec kids are doing is the digital equivalent of putting gum in locks and nails under tires. They'll grow up eventually.

don't feel bad (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455880)

Nobody expects a nigger to be able to understand complex topics such as this one. Escort yourself back to the field now and perhaps I'll go easy with the lashings.

Re:Wankers (2, Insightful)

syousef (465911) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455896)

So screwing over WOW players trying to get customer support is now "justice"? What a bunch of wankers.

Can we stop giving these jokers the attention they crave for every little idiotic stunt they pull? Every 10th story seems to be about LulzSec. I'm not really sure it's even news anymore. These guys are like internet trolls and will continue until they either don't get the attention they want or they get their asses arrested.

Re:Wankers (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455924)

They're shooting a crowd with a shotgun full of lulz.

The pellets hitting the people we don't like is the "justice" ;)

Re:Wankers (3, Insightful)

Znork (31774) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456150)

Frankly, with the latest series of indiscriminate attacks it's starting to look less like griefers run amok and more like false-flag psyops run to reduce support for hacktivism through guilt-by-association and create fertile grounds for some new draconian legislation.

Re:Wankers (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456236)

Frankly, with the latest series of indiscriminate attacks it's starting to look less like griefers run amok and more like false-flag psyops run to reduce support for hacktivism through guilt-by-association and create fertile grounds for some new draconian legislation.

Thank you for mentioning the big elephant in the room that no one else seems to want to bring up.

Re:Wankers (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456374)

Don't underestimate the idiocy and egoism of script kiddiez and wannabee anarchists. Occam's razor.

Re:Wankers (1)

Dark4Sorrow (589052) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456336)

Lulzsec isn't doing anything for "justice" or any other higher call for morality. It's all for the lulz.

i like it (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455780)

I havent thought of that. Just forwatd all your phonecalls to someone you dont like. Going to start doing that. Most of my incomming calls are from thai prostitute tha Re more than happy to get a new falang on the hook

Oh god. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455782)

When will they stop :x

cia.gov (4, Informative)

Huluvu (1371705) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455804)

“Tango down - http://t.co/2QGXy6f [t.co] - for the lulz.” http://twitter.com/#!/LulzSec/status/81115804636155906 [twitter.com] wtf

Re:cia.gov (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455996)

confirmed. cia.gov [cia.gov] seems to be down at the moment.

Re:LulzSec disables CIA web server, too! (1)

Paul Bain (9907) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456258)

LulzSec's disabling of the CIA's website [cia.gov] (CIA.gov) is currently being discussed on ZeroHedge: LulzSec Takes Down Cia.gov [zerohedge.com] One thing is certain. The crackers in LulzSec are damned good, OR they have considerable "inside" help at the CIA and FBI. Or BOTH!!

Re:LulzSec disables CIA web server, too! (4, Insightful)

Hatta (162192) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456358)

One thing is certain. The crackers in LulzSec are damned good, OR they have considerable "inside" help at the CIA and FBI. Or BOTH!!

Or the CIA doesn't use the public facing web server for anything important, so they didn't bother securing it very well.

Coincidence? (1)

saintory (944644) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455808)

I was sitting in our office when all of a sudden all the phones in the office rang at the same time. The number that came up was 800.555.1212, or 800-Directory Assistance. Since there are only a handful of us in the office today, it was ironic that only a few of us experienced it. According to our phone clocks, this happened about 2:55PM EDT. That's a little off from the article report time of attack but is it merely a coincidence? I'm curious if any other Slashdotters out there experienced this same phenomenon today.

Re:Coincidence? (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456166)

Their newest target as of 3:00 PM ET? HBGary.

Aha.

Re:Coincidence? (1)

saintory (944644) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456296)

So can I infer that all my calls are going through an HBGary trunk? Interesting...

Wait a minute... (5, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455824)

"Anonymous hacker group"...with phone lines? Does not compute.

Re:Wait a minute... (2)

DigiShaman (671371) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455968)

Most likely they're using a collection of hacked Asterisk servers or other such IP PBX systems. They may have a "line", but I seriously doubt it was ever theirs to begin with.

Re:Wait a minute... (1)

TubeSteak (669689) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456234)

"Anonymous hacker group"...with phone lines? Does not compute.

Voice Over IP is a wonderful thing.
They've probably got a hacked/donated VOIP PBX and are routing everything through that.

This has gotten crazy (2)

makubesu (1910402) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455826)

These fiends have gone to far. Quick, someone turn on the internet bat signal!

Re:This has gotten crazy (1)

Caratted (806506) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456170)

It probably went on, at full capacity about 10 minutes ago - cia.gov is down and per their tweet it's their DDoS. Act of war, any one?

Re:This has gotten crazy (2)

alostpacket (1972110) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456354)

Buffering...

Magnets! (0)

pandymen (884006) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455852)

How the f*ck do they work?!!?

Black Hats (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455908)

Seems like if I were a serious Black Hat and not just some anonymous/lulzsec script kiddie, I wouldn't welcome the unwanted attention drawn towards internet security. It might not be a good thing to anger both sides of the fence.

And in other news (1)

ideaz (1981092) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455912)

the LulzSec manages to get its daily scoop of attention on SlashDot.

I wonder if we could have a new section on the left for them now.

Re:And in other news (5, Insightful)

Dinghy (2233934) | more than 3 years ago | (#36455946)

Would you prefer another BitCoin story?

I miss wikileaks (4, Funny)

Thud457 (234763) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456048)

what's SCO up to these days?

Re:I miss wikileaks (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456130)

what's SCO up to these days?

Guys I hear Duke Nukem's coming out

Re:I miss wikileaks (1)

Restil (31903) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456202)

It's summer time in Texas. I might be more receptive to the global warming articles now.

-Restil

Re:And in other news (1)

ideaz (1981092) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456082)

Book reviews are better. I can simply ignore them without worrying the news content I'm missing on.

Re:And in other news (1)

hort_wort (1401963) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456286)

I was thinking the same thing. I haven't seen so many duplicate topics since Android was coming out.

Phreak-a-diddle-doo (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36455988)

Phreaking is the best they have here?

Whatevs.

Re:Phreak-a-diddle-doo (4, Funny)

MoldySpore (1280634) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456134)

Call them Lord Nikon. The King of Nynex.

Possible? (5, Insightful)

Jibekn (1975348) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456034)

Can we use mod points to try and get an article off the first page? please? LulzSec stuff should never hit front page on principle.

Re:Possible? (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456096)

It's called the firehose.

Re:Possible? (1)

discord5 (798235) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456246)

It's called the firehose.

Ah yes, imagine having an editor pick the best of a few articles each day and spend some time reading them, perhaps adding some value. Now we have another slashdot system to game.

Re:Possible? (4, Insightful)

Hatta (162192) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456382)

What principle is that? The LALALALAICANTHEARYOU principle?

Phone DoS! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456160)

Now that's old-school.
Fetch me a telegraph!

lulzsec (1)

aahpandasrun (948239) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456180)

I, of course, do not condone the actions of LulzSec. However, they represents the true spirit of what 4chan was always about before so called "Anonymous" hijacked our name and took things way too seriously. Anyone remember the Internet Hate Machine video? It was a joke. The most dastardly thing /btards had done at that point was prank call Tom Green. Before letterhead and newsletters, before stupid legion, it was always about just fucking around and having fun. While this is taking things too far, obviously, it is fun to sit on the sidelines and watch.

Great, I can see where this is going... (5, Insightful)

cjb658 (1235986) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456198)

"Lawmakers today announced new legislation that will take away more of our civil liberties, in response to recent attacks by the groups LulzSec and Anonymous."

Re:Great, I can see where this is going... (0)

Anonymous Psychopath (18031) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456284)

"Lawmakers today announced new legislation that will take away more of our civil liberties, in response to recent attacks by the groups LulzSec and Anonymous."

No mod points today or you'd get +1 Insightful. This is exactly what will happen. Targeting the FBI is a good way to graduate from "annoyance" to "menace".

Re:Great, I can see where this is going... (2, Insightful)

HockeyPuck (141947) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456432)

What "civil liberties" are you worried about losing? I'm not aware of any that explicitly grant you the ability to phone-bomb some organization. Are you still pissed that you cannot send spam faxes to people?

Re:Great, I can see where this is going... (2)

Anonymous Psychopath (18031) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456492)

What "civil liberties" are you worried about losing? I'm not aware of any that explicitly grant you the ability to phone-bomb some organization. Are you still pissed that you cannot send spam faxes to people?

How about legislation that requires telephony providers to provide call detail and subscriber records to law enforcement on demand?

This is a first (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456298)

An article that DOESN'T link to an ad-laden, absolutely overloaded media outlet crap-laden filler page? Impossible! This one must have slipped right by samzenpus.

Isn't this along the same lines as... (2)

Rivalz (1431453) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456302)

Isn't this along the same line as causing a traffic jam at a busy intersect just to say hay you should have a police officer watching every traffic corner?
Maybe I'm missing the point but mostly they just seem to cause petty disturbances. Are they trying to make it so companies have to weigh every new venture they role out with the thought of risk vs reward?
I always wanted to be a person who achieves something not someone that goes over to the next guys sand castle and kicks it down and says damn should have made that sucker hurricane proof. Better luck next time.

I'm just surprised these guys don't naturally just turn on each other over time.

Like DRM to software piracy (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456330)

Like DRM to software piracy, LulzSec will probably only further annoying restrictions on useful stuff. I can understand the feeling of frustration and the helplessness that is felt when you consider the logistics of actually making a difference, but unlike the actual organized help that wikileaks have provided, LulzSec really only seems to be doing it for the lulz.

LulzSec new toilet stall denial of service attack (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456348)

Recently LulzSec began a campaign of denying access to public toilets. By using technical means of using up toilet paper and using it to clog pipes they have shut down many public facilities, denying access to both paper and flushing....

Look, we know the entire Internet isn't secure. But we all *should* also know it is easier to destroy than create. Grow up just a little bit please. Denial of service on a service available to the public is typically pretty easy no matter what it is.

Next /. article of LulzSec (1)

csumpi (2258986) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456368)

better by their mugshots. This is getting annoying. At this point they pissed lots of people off, someone will find them.

Pfft! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456402)

These frak knuckles are going to force the hand of law makers to well and truly make their activities classified as acts of terrorism.

Way to go frak knuckles.

Seems like... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36456440)

Seems like everyone that has bitched about the loss of rights, the encroachment of the federal government, and the crimes committed daily by CEOs and banks, while begging for someone to do something, is now crying for the something that someone is doing to be stopped.

Look. You can't have your fucking cake and eat it too. Either you want these criminals (CEOs, bankers, government officials) to suffer or you don't.

Bitching about your precious MMO downtime, IMHO, means you don't. Which makes you part of the problem.

KUDOS LULZSEC, KEEP FIGHTING THE GOOD FIGHT MY BROTHERS

hackers? really? (2)

Charliemopps (1157495) | more than 3 years ago | (#36456484)

Does anyone honestly believe that LulzSec is anything other that some government agency. They're clearly trying to piss off the general public... and to what purpose? Support for some key upcoming regulatory changes to the internet?
Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?