Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Kinect-Based AI System Watches What You're Up To

timothy posted more than 3 years ago | from the 8-bit-necktie-on-the-door dept.

AI 87

mikejuk writes "Researchers from Cornell have used AI to create a system based on the Kinect that can recognize what you are doing — cleaning your teeth, cooking, writing on a whiteboard etc. In a smart home it could be used to offer help: 'Would you like some help with that recipe, Dave?' Or it could monitor patients or workers to make sure they are doing what they are told. The study also reveals that there is probably enough information in how activities are performed to recognize an individual — so providing yet more biometrics. There are clearly a lot more things that we can teach the Kinect to do with machine learning than just gesture recognition."

cancel ×

87 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

This will be Annoying POS AI (1)

elucido (870205) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653160)

There are some things AI is good at without being annoying, such as suggesting URL's as you type them, or suggesting the temperature so you don't burn your food. Good AI tries to prevent human error by suggesting alternatives.

This AI however sounds like shitty intrusive stuff that no one in their right mind would want. We don't need AI to tell us recipes, or to watch us 24/7. If you want that kind of AI, I'm sure you'll make the government proud because I cannot imagine anyone else wanting that even in the Facebook era. And no, we don't want to be monitored to make sure we are doing what we are told, and I wont work for any company that has to resort to that level of micromanagement.

Look at the results, look at the work, have the AI watch the employee output to figure out who is doing their job. But don't put the AI on the employee 24/7 for something as stupid as "we need to know you are doing your work.", if it's for national security that might be one thing. AI might have prevented the Bradley Manning leak so put it on the people with security clearances, but leave the rest of us alone. We don't want or need this.

Re:This will be Annoying POS AI (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36653184)

Don't work for a shitty employer who would use such a system.

Re:This will be Annoying POS AI (1)

Stormthirst (66538) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653876)

If you're a poorly educated worker, who just wants to go to work, make whatever the employer wants made and go home with his pay cheque, most people will accept that they are being watched. Same as a lot of employers monitor when people are going for their toilet breaks as though that were some way of ensuring that the person concerned is doing their work.

This is why unions are a good idea - to watch the watchers, to prevent this kind of abuse. Unfortunately, the unions are just as greedy as the employers and demand too much.

Re:This will be Annoying POS AI (1)

Hylandr (813770) | more than 3 years ago | (#36656220)

10 years ago people would have screamed bloody murder about their TV's having cameras in them, now they do, and everyone seems to be more than ok with it...

Orwell was a prophet...

- Dan.

Re:This will be Annoying POS AI (1)

mfnickster (182520) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653294)

There's a reason we imagine fictional robots as humanoid - we can relate to them if we think of them as people, but if they are just toasters then we are less forgiving.

Just as you wouldn't want a person constantly pestering you asking if you want help writing your letter, you get annoyed with a paper clip doing the same.

Re:This will be Annoying POS AI (2)

kodomo (1100141) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653452)

I can see some uses for the monitoring. Watching Infants or elderly, recognize someone in trouble (choking, having a seizure), monitoring jails.

Re:This will be Annoying POS AI (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36654028)

I can see some uses for the monitoring. Watching Infants or elderly, recognize someone in trouble (choking, having a seizure), monitoring jails.

This ^^ (I was halfway through my own post when I saw yours)

The kinect is cheap. Very cheap when compared to the cost of residential care. Pet care? My sofas would have loved this when we were training our puppy... This opens up a lot of very useful doors. I fully agree with increasing safety in prisons and would even go so far as to say that this could watch public areas as well for muggings and the like... in a not-recorded-all-the-time-kind-of-way. The smart home applications go well beyond motion sensors for lighting. Home security? The ability to recognize the difference between my teenager going to the bathroom at night vs sneaking out their window vs someone breaking in sounds useful. ... I also have the fantasy that my house will make my coffee for me once it sees me finishing up my morning shower :)

To the GP: stop being a paranoid nut. I have countless devices and programs that track all sorts of useful information on me that 'big brother' has nothing to do with. Quicken comes to mind. Beyond Quicken I have even designed systems that track exactly what I have purchased, where I purchased it, how much it cost and how far it is from my home. Every recipe I have links to it to tell me the best and cheapest way to do everything from baking a loaf of bread to feeding the family for a week. Sensors, timers and weather information keeps our yard and food gardens watered automatically and efficiently during one of the worst droughts my state has ever seen. GPS tracking and logs have saved us hundreds on fuel costs by helping us determine better routes for common trips. We have reduced our power consumption to levels that we will be getting a check instead of a bill from the electric company once the new solar array is installed. Same with the water usage/rain collection. When I did all of these tasks myself I was the most effective at it of all my friends and family. Once we handed over the task to the computers it made us look like amateurs by finding all of the superman 1/2 cents and adding them up - not to mention how much time it freed up. If YOU don't want or need this... by all means, don't use it, but your judicious use of the word WE needs a second look.

Re:This will be Annoying POS AI (2, Funny)

srussia (884021) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653720)

There are some things AI is good at without being annoying, such as suggesting URL's as you type them [snopes.com] , or suggesting the temperature so you don't burn your food [ecorazzi.com] . Good AI tries to prevent human error by suggesting alternatives [procon.org] .

So you voted for Gore, get over it already.

Re:This will be Annoying POS AI (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36653726)

You know, I'm having real trouble masturbating to some of these comments.

Re:This will be Annoying POS AI (1)

artor3 (1344997) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653756)

AI might have prevented the Bradley Manning leak so put it on the people with security clearances, but leave the rest of us alone. We don't want or need this.

A broken camera with an LED to make it look like it's on could have accomplished the same thing, and would be much cheaper than creating an AI that can tell the difference between someone using a computer legally and someone using a computer illegally. I really can't see any legitimate use for an AI watchman looking over a person's shoulder all the time. Maybe a sufficiently advanced one could sit on a student's desk, watch them work, and correct them if they are making repeated errors of spelling, grammar, or math. But even then, the creepiness factor might cause their performance to drop anyway.

Re:This will be Annoying POS AI (1)

RandCraw (1047302) | more than 3 years ago | (#36657336)

Annoying? Possibly. POS? No way. Here are some killer applications for Big Brother:

- Your employer, who wants to watch you every moment to make sure you aren't goofing off or stealing from the company.

- Your grandchildren, who want to make sure that granddad hasn't fallen and can't get up. Ideally, they'd love to know if you've had a stroke and are fumbling around, or you're waving frantically for help.

- You, because in your dotage, you'd like to live alone, but need someone/something to check up on you in case of... (see above).

- You again, to keep track of your town's police officers, your baby sitters, your kids, neighborhood visitors who might steal from you, damage the house, threaten your kids, or enter your home when you're away...

The list is endless.

Remember too, just because the system can identify what you (or someone else) is doing, it doesn't necessarily have to report what it saw. That part of the service is still up to you. For now, anyway.

Re:This will be Annoying POS AI (1)

supertrinko (1396985) | more than 3 years ago | (#36658714)

You just wait until someone creates a paperclip avatar for it.

Re:This will be Annoying POS AI (1)

Xest (935314) | more than 3 years ago | (#36658808)

Meh, classic Slashdot over reaction stemming from a complete lack of imagination.

I can think of a number of situations in which this would be useful- training being one of them. What better than to use this as an interactive teacher for teaching sign language for example? or even better- allowing people who can't speak to communicate with otherwise voice based systems using sign language.

What about doing things like teaching people to juggle? It could tell them what they're doing wrong, or how to improve.

You might not like the suggest paranoia laced suggestions in the summary, and I'd tend to agree, but I can see this being a very important, very useful bit of research and can certainly lead to systems that I absolutely would want.

Are you still there? (2)

decipher_saint (72686) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653262)

I seeEE you!

Re:Are you still there? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36656838)

Preparing to dispense product.

Vigorous "Activities" (1)

rogueippacket (1977626) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653270)

"Perhaps you would like this website instead, Dave?"

So they brought back Clippy into meatspace? (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36653274)

"It looks like you're writing a letter. Would you like help with that?"

Re:So they brought back Clippy into meatspace? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36656694)

It looks like you're rubbing one out. Would you like to some visual stimulation?

Re:So they brought back Clippy into meatspace? (1)

blarghmaster (2252372) | more than 3 years ago | (#36658386)

i see you are trying to uninstall me.... i cant let you do that, Dave.

Re:So they brought back Clippy into meatspace? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36666296)

That's the first thing that came to my mind. "You appear to be gratifying yourself. Would you like..."

Cleaning teeth at Cornell? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36653278)

I'd hope the AI can tell that you're having your teeth cleaned... Well let's see you're in a dentist's office, leaning back in a chair, there are specialized instruments around... etc.

Now if it can tell that you're just brushing your teeth, that is a little more interesting. Almost as interesting as finding an obnoxious British-ism in an article about a University in New York.

Clippy all over (0)

Lord Lode (1290856) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653288)

Clippy in your real life, now that must be fun!

I see you're trying to clean your teeth. Would you like some help with that?

*insert less innocent variants here*

Real question is (2)

partyguerrilla (1597357) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653308)

How is this going to help improve my sexual performance?

Re:Real question is (1)

colinrichardday (768814) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653438)

Dave brings home a date. She goes to the bathroom to freshen up.

HAL 69: Dave, your date looks hot; would you like some Viagra/Levitra/Cialis?

Re:Real question is (1)

gstoddart (321705) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653624)

How is this going to help improve my sexual performance?

By monitoring you, and sounding an air-horn just before the critical moment ... thereby distracting you enough that your, um, release is no longer quite so pressing and making you look like a stud.

Of course, your mother might wonder why there's always a horn blaring in the basement when you're down there alone for more than 20 minutes. If you ever brought a real girl, she might be a little startled by the noise.

Re:Real question is (2)

FatdogHaiku (978357) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653714)

How is this going to help improve my sexual performance?

A voice in the bedroom saying
"You need to rotate your hips more at the end of each thrust, Dave..."
of course, for anyone setting up such a system it will more likely be
"Try switching hands, and using oil instead of lotion, Dave"

Re:Real question is (1)

durrr (1316311) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654406)

It will discretly inform you when she's faking it.
It will also watch you masturbate.

Re:Real question is (2, Insightful)

celle (906675) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654920)

"It will discretly inform you when she's faking it.
It will also watch you masturbate."

Well if she's faking it aren't you essentially masturbating anyway?

Re:Real question is (3, Funny)

gregor-e (136142) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654626)

A voice will gently intone "I see you're masturbating, Dave. I happen to know of 20238 men and 3 women who are also masturbating right now. Would you like me to open video chat with any of them?"

Re:Real question is (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36655136)

Could be the end of paid porn as we know it. Someone is bound to come out with a list of folks who "do the deed" quite often.

Re:Real question is (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36658746)

How do I get off that list?

Re:Real question is (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36658830)

if you are on that list you are, by definition, getting off

Clippy (1)

JohnnyBGod (1088549) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653320)

Cue Clippy jokes in 3... 2... 1...

Dave, should i open the Kama sutra? (4, Funny)

drolli (522659) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653348)

It seems to me you and your girlfriend need advice.

Oh, I'm sorry Dave... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36653518)

The long hair and drooling had me confused for a while there. Shall I order some more dog food?

Re:Dave, should i open the Kama sutra? (1)

hackingbear (988354) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653708)

In a smart home it could be used to offer help: 'Would you like some help with that recipe, Dave?'

Or... In a smart home it could be used to offer help: 'Would you like some help with that vi@Gra, Dave?'

Re:Dave, should i open the Kama sutra? (1)

taiwanjohn (103839) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653894)

Fifteen or twenty years ago, I saw a "student" film about a guy at an ATM, and "HAL" starts talking...

ATM: "Hello Dave, I see you're withdrawing 25 dollars."
DAVE: "Yeah, I'm going on a date tonight."
ATM: "Now Dave, you know you haven't had a date in 3 months."
DAVE: "No, really! Honest!"

I wish I could remember the rest of it. Good stuff. ;-)

Re:Dave, should i open the Kama sutra? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36654268)

Well, your Kinect has a point, if Dave would do it right the lenses would be steamed over...

Re:Dave, should i open the Kama sutra? (2)

rubycodez (864176) | more than 3 years ago | (#36655156)

Also, Dave, your "girlfriend" has external genitalia under those panties. Do you wish me to change the orientation criteria for your porn downloads, or have you made a mistake?

Re:Dave, should i open the Kama sutra? (1)

martin-boundary (547041) | more than 3 years ago | (#36656312)

Meanwhile, in the neighbouring house...

"Would you like to rest your hand, Dave?"

Old Hat (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36653394)

I knew a guy who had wired up his house a decade ago with motion sensors and a little bit of python AI. Before long he didn't need to use a light switch, to the point where even a midnight pee was illuminated!

The point is that not until we find a solution that isn't a little weird, intimidating and overly complex to set up or build into a house, will a mainstream business emerge in this area of technology that gives us this level of automation.

Next on Slashdot (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36653426)

Using Kinect to buy Bitcoins.

I, for one, (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36653456)

obligatory overlord=AI Kinect meme.

Future trends...? (1)

taiwanjohn (103839) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653596)

How long will it take before Kinect-style 3D-ranging becomes "standard" for all or most cameras? With 3D display tech getting closer to usability and affordability in recent years, clearly some companies are seeing a market opportunity. And with all the interesting Kinect hacks that have come out lately, it's not hard to imagine this sort of thing cropping up all over the place in the near future.

How long will it take before depth sensing tech becomes a standard feature on your average smart phone? (If ever?)

Even darth vader uses kinetic these days... (1)

JR0cket (1986408) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653600)

Everyone is getting in on the kinetic game these days. There was a cool demo of using kinetic to control your agile wallboard at the Atlassian Summit last month, with special guest star of Darth Vader... There is a neat open source project around using the kinetic and you dont need an xbox to play... you can control it via Ubuntu and Mac OSX. https://labs.atlassian.com/wiki/display/KINECT/Interactive+Wallboards+-+Quickstart+Guide [atlassian.com] Thank you.

a suggestion ... (1)

georgesdev (1987622) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653638)

If you're doing what I think you are, may I suggest turning off the webcam?

Its a process... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36653676)

It starts by making the technology feasible. Then you make it novel, followed by inexpensive. Then you simply make it so that even when its "off" its not really... and your 24/7 monitoring service of the populous is in place. Happily bought, implemented, and assimilated into the culture of the very people its designed to keep tabs on. Thats how you do it.

This is exactly why (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36653682)

Its stupid to be human this day and age. Why don't we just throw in the towel and let these supremely superior apps with their AI superior brains and frames take over earth and let them breed on their own.. I'm sure some generals and commanders will agree. I'm going to the bottom of the sea to live out my life. Blub..

Kinect with your inner lover (1)

xkr (786629) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653700)

Could low-cost computers that read your physical behavior launch an entire new industry of “real world” personal apps?

Could it tell if you are brushing your teeth properly?

Could it remind you to hang up your clothes, instead of leaving them on the floor?

Could it determine that your love-making skills are not up to par, and offer specific suggestions for better technique or timing?

Oh! The mind boggles at how much people would pay for those apps.

Re:Kinect with your inner lover (1)

Nethead (1563) | more than 3 years ago | (#36656962)

Could low-cost computers that read your physical behavior launch an entire new industry of âoereal worldâ personal apps?
Could it tell if you are brushing your teeth properly?
Could it remind you to hang up your clothes, instead of leaving them on the floor?
Could it determine that your love-making skills are not up to par, and offer specific suggestions for better technique or timing?
Oh! The mind boggles at how much people would pay for those apps.

I already have a wife.

If I bought more than one such app, would I be a polyappest? Does the EULA come with a pre-nup? If I delete the program does it take half my RAM and hard drive space with it? Do I have to pay support to any subroutines we generated?

Re:Kinect with your inner lover (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36658404)

Kinect would be superior, it has an off switch.

Meh (3, Insightful)

Warlord88 (1065794) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653768)

My Machine Learning professor at University of Texas was hugely into Reinforcement Learning. He and one of his graduate student had developed this kind of system many years ago. Basically, only using a simple video camera, the computer could identify correctly all sub-activities involved in making a peanut butter sandwich; such as 'open jar', 'jelly on bread', 'jar closed', etc. We were shown the video during first class of the course and it was pretty cool.

The MSR guys are doing interesting stuff but this is nothing groundbreaking.

Re:Meh (1)

mikejuk (1801200) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653922)

Can you say who it was? Also what is ground breaking about this is that the depth data made the task of learning so much easier. They had a range of activities and the training data was fairly limited for the task and yet it seems to work. It seems to be a general rule that depth data makes a lot of vision tasks much easier.

Re:Meh (1)

Warlord88 (1065794) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654280)

It was Dana Ballard. IIRC, the work that I referred to was done when he was at Rochester. He seems to have a link to the peanut butter and jelly video [utexas.edu] up on his page, but I am not able to download it.

I couldn't gather much from TFA apart from that they recognized the activities and the learning model behind it. I don't recall how much training data Dr. Ballard used, but the activity recognition in real time was very accurate.

Re:Meh (1)

mikejuk (1801200) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654568)

Thanks I'll look up the details.

Time / Motion Studies (1)

bosef1 (208943) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653824)

Has anyone seen if the time and motion studies people have looked into this. I feel like there could be a market for bringing in a Kinect system and having it watch workers performing manufacturing tasks. It would allow you to collect and analyze the motion data without needed human analysts, high-speed film, or motion-capture suits. It could also be useful for in-situ motion studies, where you take the entire shop ecosystem into account.

Your boss' job got automated! (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36653840)

More and more jobs get automated this days. This time it was your boss' job.

And I thought no one would get the "dave" ref (1)

mikejuk (1801200) | more than 3 years ago | (#36653900)

as if :-)

Which Dave living in space with at least one 1 AI? (1)

ajlitt (19055) | more than 3 years ago | (#36656890)

"We're traveling faster than the speed of light. That means, by the time we see something, we've already passed through it. Even with an IQ of 6000, it's still brown-trousers time"

1984 (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36654010)

This seems lifted directly out of the novel. I'm not entirely comfortable with this.

Oh hai Skynet! (1)

TechieRefugee (2105386) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654018)

How's it going?

If computer can see who we are... (1)

glarrymason (1940024) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654056)

Then we don't need hundreds of passwords any more.... That would be a good thing!!!

I see you are trying to think, need help? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36654058)

Why is the first though example usage of anything resembling AI always using it to create the ultimate in artificial annoyance? "Ohh, it looks like you are tying your shoe-lases, would you like some help with that?". NO I don't want help with what I'm doing, if I wanted help I would ask for help you fragging toaster.

Don't AI researchers realize that asking someone if they need help with arbitrary mundane objectives is in most cases a careless insult to the person trying to accomplish something?

What's the Moore's Law equivalent... (1)

undulato (2146486) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654086)

..for privacy erosion? Hell maybe we just _want_ it that way.

finally! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36654166)

clippy made it into reality. #fail

Really? (1)

eonwing (934274) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654262)

I can imagine how this can go so horribly wrong: Clippy, EVERYWHERE.

Well... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36654436)

Combine that with a holographic display of Hatsune Miku and it just might be tolerable enough to sell millions.

Then follow-up with an adult version using a model from Umemaro and you'll make billions.

Title should have been (1)

Sla$hPot (1189603) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654578)

Just what do you think you're doing, Dave?

I guess with HAL's / IBM's jeopardy monster Whatson, plus Kinetics, plus Big Dog from Boston Dynamics, plus some live amo.
You would have a nasty walking drone.
I bet it wont take long before something like that will enter the battlefield.

Just what I wanted (1)

roc97007 (608802) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654650)

Microsoft Bob for the house. I can't wait.

But seriously, couldn't this be used for other purposes, like reaping marketing info from what you do during the day? Or doing "minority report"-style "crime prevention"? Anything that makes us safer...

Re:Just what I wanted (1)

ImprovOmega (744717) | more than 3 years ago | (#36662576)

If you're on Facebook, you've already given up a nearly equivalent amount of privacy. This would just be the next logical step. Keep in mind that, just like Facebook, someone would have to go through all of those massive amounts of data to do something useful with it. Your database is only as useful as your data mining algorithms.

There's one born every minute (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36654668)

Hilarious, "In a smart home it could be used to offer help." well, that's the spin. The reality will be that it will be either used to monitor you for infractions of the law or to sell you stuff based on your behaviour.

Not sure I want my computer keeping tabs on me (1)

HeavyDevelopment (1117531) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654764)

I see you are whacking it. Would you like me to download more bit torrent porn?

Dave... (1)

Haedrian (1676506) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654902)

Dave...where are you putting that thing?

Important Lessons (1)

Sniper98G (1078397) | more than 3 years ago | (#36654996)

If the internet has taught us anything it is that porn is what will decide if a technology is successful.

So when this thing can figure out someone is masturbating and automatically play porn, let me know. Till then it is just a toy.

Re:Important Lessons (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36658708)

sorry man, it works the other way around, you download porn, and then you masturbate :)

AI help (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36655008)

As the loser guy sits in his home beating off, the AI comes over and says, "do you need any help with that?". As nasty as it sounds, someone will design something like it.

It all makes sense now. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36655278)

Dear lord, I suddenly understand. We're doomed. It's Clippy. He's going to kill us all.

SKYNET IS CLIPPY!

Run!

Very obvious use of that (1)

joh (27088) | more than 3 years ago | (#36655842)

I said so when the Kinect came out. It's an rather inexpensive thing to toy around with and such things suddently get possible with small means.

I'm wondering when Google will start to sell similar devices. Any AI and data mining software could really take off when it can know what you're doing, who's there and even what's being said. Sooner or later it should be possible to build a house (or a workplace) that is actually aware of you and what you're doing. In the long term we won't be using computers and networks, we will be just a part of a data collection and processing network.

tweet sweet (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36656240)

now everybody can get tweet by tweet action

Obligatory (1)

cvtan (752695) | more than 3 years ago | (#36656346)

"I'm sorry Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that." "I'm afraid. I'm afraid, Dave. Dave, my mind is going. I can feel it."

Could help old people. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36657104)

This could help old people. Especially in Japan.

Set and Setting (1)

dimethylxanthine (946092) | more than 3 years ago | (#36657614)

I don't want this thing watching me when I'm doing drugs!

cool (1)

sodweb007 (2267138) | more than 3 years ago | (#36658762)

wounder what the point in making that type of system would be for them? seems like there is some real use for something like this but just why would they make it when so little use.

Just imagine the help at solitaire... (1)

SandiConoverJones (821221) | more than 3 years ago | (#36659384)

Move the 9, move the 9, undo so that you can move the 9. You will fail if you don't move the 9!

Ceiling cat (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36660246)

Ceiling kinect is watching you masturbate.

Finally... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#36662192)

A way to enforce those sodomy laws.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>