×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Gimp 2.8 Finally Released

timothy posted about 2 years ago | from the they-brought-out-the-gimp-again-and-again dept.

The Gimp 737

Cryophallion writes "After many years of development, GIMP 2.8 is finally released. Among its features: the oft-desired single-window mode, layer groups, and many other massive improvements, including some of the GIMP UI team's work. This might be the release that helps make The GIMP a much more user friendly experience for newcomers, and has features that are rivaling those of certain exceptionally expensive commercial programs. While the porting of GEGL is still ongoing (and recently reported to have made massive advances made), this is a major step forward for one of the premier open source projects." Here are the official release notes.

cancel ×
This is a preview of your comment

No Comment Title Entered

Anonymous Coward 1 minute ago

No Comment Entered

737 comments

FRIST (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39877915)

FRIST

Re:FRIST (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39877981)

Morons can't spell.

Re:FRIST (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878097)

Exactly, everyone knows frist is spelled with a 1.

Gimp still limping after all these years... (3, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39877951)

...with an interface worse than Penn & Teller's driving game.

Re:Gimp still limping after all these years... (4, Funny)

schroedingers_hat (2449186) | about 2 years ago | (#39878259)

I find having it list slowly to the left is actually quite good for drawing curves once you get used to it.

Maaaaaan... (5, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39877959)

The Gimp Users website is a design trainwreck.

Re:Maaaaaan... (4, Insightful)

DeathToBill (601486) | about 2 years ago | (#39878051)

Well, I think the prominent headline, "GIMP on Linux - Compile it yourself!" tells you the sort of people who designed it.

The Name (4, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39877965)

They really ought to consider re-naming it. Try installing it in - say - a junior high school some time. See how that goes over.

Re:The Name (4, Funny)

Zontar The Mindless (9002) | about 2 years ago | (#39878021)

They really ought to consider re-naming it. Try installing it in - say - a junior high school some time. See how that goes over.

They can name it "Love Child Of roman_mir And APK" for all I care. I'm just glad to see they grew a brain cell and adopted single-window mode. Y'know, for human users.

Re:The Name (4, Informative)

djlemma (1053860) | about 2 years ago | (#39878387)

Did you ever use it in the pre-1.0 days, when there wasn't yet support for layers? You had to open each "layer" entity as a separate file in a separate window, and then it would let you combine/multiply/divide/etc between multiple files to come up with a composite. Now, THAT was a lot of windows to keep track of.

Re:The Name (3, Insightful)

crazyjj (2598719) | about 2 years ago | (#39878085)

I actually used to teach a class where I wanted to use it. But the name stopped me. A real shame. Wish someone would fork it with a name that isn't so childish and offensive. They can improve it all they like, but no one is ever going to take it seriously with that name.

Re:The Name (4, Informative)

Lord Lode (1290856) | about 2 years ago | (#39878119)

Warning: non native English speaker here.

I didn't know gimp was an offensive word. Do children recognize it as offensive? Is it because it sounds like "chimp"? Are monkeys offensive?

Re:The Name (5, Informative)

Atzanteol (99067) | about 2 years ago | (#39878169)

It's an offensive slang term for handicapped people. And it speaks volumes about the marketing ability of geeks.

Re:The Name (5, Insightful)

Dishevel (1105119) | about 2 years ago | (#39878321)

GNU
Image
Manipulation
Program

It is only offensive to those who feel a deep seated need to be offended.
Unfortunately there are a lot of people who just can not spend a whole day without being "Deeply Offended" by something.

Re:The Name (5, Insightful)

jockm (233372) | about 2 years ago | (#39878477)

Considering your signature, I fear this is going to fall on deaf ears. You have a very high threshold for offense, and believe everyone should too. I suspect this because you are willing to equate a piece of computer hardware to criminal sodomy out in public, but please correct me if I am wrong.

But here's the thing, if you are a disabled person then Gimp is just like "the N word", and insult hurled at you in anger and derision. It is also a word you reserve the right to yourself. You don't have to like it, you don't have to agree, but you do have to accept that, because that is the reality out in the world — at least with enough people to matter.

And I can see why you think your explanation, giving the name in full, is cogent. But here's the thing: If the default were to say "The GNU Image Manipulation Program" and some people shortened it to "GIMP" then that would be one thing. Unfortunately that isn't the case. The devs of the program called it GIMP from the beginning, and took a very long time to accept that anyone could be offended by that. And now it is a line in the sand to them, one they will not cross.

The name is a problem. It stops people using it, it stops schools teaching it, it hurts the app.

Re:The Name (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878339)

Maybe they were probably thinking more along the lines of "bring out the gimp" from Pulp Fiction?

Re:The Name (3, Insightful)

CanHasDIY (1672858) | about 2 years ago | (#39878173)

Warning: non native English speaker here.

I didn't know gimp was an offensive word. Do children recognize it as offensive? Is it because it sounds like "chimp"? Are monkeys offensive?

Children? Nah, the only reason they think the word might be offensive is because of the way idiotic, childish adults react to it.

Re:The Name (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878481)

So I assume you use the word "nigger" often? It might be offensive only because of the way idiotic, childish adults react to it. Or perhaps because it has developed a meaning which means something bad. Do you come home and call your wife "bitch"? No? But it's just a female dog... no.. it's actually taken on a different definition to most people. Just like the word "gimp".

Re:The Name (0, Troll)

crazyjj (2598719) | about 2 years ago | (#39878185)

"Gimp" (at least in American English) is a seriously derogatory term for someone who is crippled. Apparently, some idiot thought that using that as a acronym for GNU Image Manipulation Program would just be HILARIOUS.

Re:The Name (0)

chill (34294) | about 2 years ago | (#39878197)

Gimp means lame or crippled. Calling someone a gimp is an insulting way of calling them defective. Similar to calling someone a retard.

Not the brightest name for a software package.

Re:The Name (1)

jawtheshark (198669) | about 2 years ago | (#39878231)

It is, and I didn't know it was an offensive word before looking it up [onlineslan...ionary.com] , which I did a looooong time ago when I first read about people here finding the word inappropriate. It's a less nice word to say "cripple" and "cripple" isn't exactly nice. There is also this [wikipedia.org] , but I'm not sure how it's related That said, I don't think kids should know what a Gimp is.

The thing that irks me, is that you could simply say "GNU Image Manipulation Program" instead and nobody would bat an eyelash. It's not as is "Adobe Photoshop" is short.

However, both Adobe Photoshop and The GIMP are both way overkill for schoolchildren. Personally, I'd go Paint.NET, which is a great product. Just too bad there is no real Linux equivalent for it.

Re:The Name (3, Informative)

Nadir (805) | about 2 years ago | (#39878303)

<quote><p> Just too bad there is no real Linux equivalent for it.</p></quote>

You stand corrected sir: http://pinta-project.com/

Re:The Name (1)

MnemonicMan (2596371) | about 2 years ago | (#39878311)

There is a Linux alternative for Paint.NET: Pinta [pinta-project.com] . It's coming along and is already decent. It's available on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Re:The Name (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878279)

Native English speaker here. If anyone's going to find "gimp" offensive (and thus fun), it's children. Saying things like "stop running like a gimp" is pretty common for high school kids. (In case non-English speakers don't know, "gimp" is a derogatory term for "physically handicapped")

Re:The Name (3, Informative)

DeathToBill (601486) | about 2 years ago | (#39878437)

I'm a native English speaker, living in England. I've never heard 'gimp' used to mean anything other than the software.

Must be an American thing.

Re:The Name (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878445)

Warning: non native English speaker here.

I didn't know gimp was an offensive word. Do children recognize it as offensive? Is it because it sounds like "chimp"? Are monkeys offensive?

It's the term used for a sexual fetishist who likes to be dominated and who dresses in a leather or rubber body suit with mask, zips, chains, etc. Example:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/30/Zentai_BDSM.jpg

I'm not sure why they originally used the name, but it was a terrible idea which is hindering further adoption of the software. I'm not sure that children know what it means, but the adults who care for them sure do.

Re:The Name (1)

torgosan (141603) | about 2 years ago | (#39878271)

"....Childish and offensive?" GNU Image Manipulation Program was GIMP long before P.C became vogue and began screwing up this country. Deal.

Re:The Name (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878319)

That's pretty lazy thinking. Slavery was also in use for hundreds of years, long before P.C. became vogue; how long something has been done has no relation to whether it is something we should be doing.

Re:The Name (0)

Dishevel (1105119) | about 2 years ago | (#39878375)

Try not to fight it.
Those who spend their lives being offended by everything will in no way be swayed by your arguments.
Even if they were well thought out.

Re:The Name (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878419)

Yeah, it's like my innocently named Net-Interactive Graphic Game Emulator for Ruby. For some reason, people get all pissy when I use the acronym.

Re:The Name (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878465)

I think they should change it to Newly Implemented GNU Graphics Editing Resource...but "somebody" would probably claim to be offended. People are just too sensitive these days, am I right?

Re:The Name (0)

b0bby (201198) | about 2 years ago | (#39878393)

Yeah, the name is weak. The one time I installed it for a user at work, he happened to be handicapped and was like "what are you trying to say here?" Fortunately he has a sense of humor & wasn't too bothered by it, but still it's not a good thing.

Re:The Name (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878181)

That's a good idea. Maybe they could name it after one of the planets, or something.

Re:The Name (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878391)

Yep, Uranus is a much better an non-offensive name

Re:The Name (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878337)

I agree about changing the name. Even discussing its use in a college course makes me feel uncomfortable. It really thwarts it's use by a larger audience for the derogatory reason in addition to it not indicating what it actually does. Of course hinting at what a product does isn't mandatory for a product's success (countless examples that in the computer world) but when it's one of the alternatives to a program that has now becoming a universally known term for image editing, maybe a name change would certainly help spread its use.

That being said, I'm more up in arms about the fact that it is a derogatory term.

Re:The Name (1, Insightful)

Hatta (162192) | about 2 years ago | (#39878369)

Boo hoo. If you can't get over the name, it's pretty clear who is the childish one.

have they speeded it up any?? (0)

RobertLTux (260313) | about 2 years ago | (#39877983)

I don't know if its debugging stuff or what but i tried a recent build and it was DOG SLOW. (win7starter on a 1.7 atom) gimp 2.6 runs decently.

Re:have they speeded it up any?? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878055)

I don't know if its debugging stuff or what but i tried a recent build and it was DOG SLOW. (win7starter on a 1.7 atom) gimp 2.6 runs decently.

Boots up pretty fast on Ubuntu 12.04 with an Intel SSD.

Re:have they speeded it up any?? (1)

Ksevio (865461) | about 2 years ago | (#39878065)

I had the same issue with it, but it seemed to be just when starting up, after a couple minutes it sped up a bit more.

Wasn't a big fan of their dark gray on light black theme.

Re:have they speeded it up any?? (5, Interesting)

Sarten-X (1102295) | about 2 years ago | (#39878257)

Wasn't a big fan of their dark gray on light black theme.

Don't ever do pro image work, then.

You may be familiar with those oddly-colored pictures that you stare at for a while, then look at a white wall and see the true-color image. Your eyes get used to whatever colors are around, and try to compensate by altering your perception. When working for hours on the same image, editors' eyes will start changing the color balance as they're working, and suddenly that bright red shirt is just a little too dull on that left side, so they raise the saturation until it looks good... then ten minutes later it looks like the shirt's plastic.

Professional retouchers often surround themselves with as much matte 50% gray as possible, because it doesn't affect the color balance. Sure, it's ugly, but it makes for better pictures.

Re:have they speeded it up any?? (1)

Sarten-X (1102295) | about 2 years ago | (#39878417)

Poor form replying to myself and all that, but 100 points to anybody knowledgeable and/or ambitious enough to find the right term for the phenomenon, and preferably a better (yet layman-accessible) description of how it works.

Paint.NET is what GIMP wishes it could be. (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39877989)

Time to just shoot it in the head like Ol' Yeller.

Bring out the gimp (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878003)

Wow, a shitty looking interface and features that have been in Photoshop and other decent image editors for years if not more than a decade? *fap* *fap* *fap* OH GOD. I'm cumming!

Application Frame (5, Interesting)

RandomUsername99 (574692) | about 2 years ago | (#39878025)

It's kind of funny how, after all of this griping (from people like me) about lack of Photoshop like single-window mode in Gimp, Photoshop, at least for Mac, defaults to not having an "Application Frame"– which essentially means that it's not, by default, in single-window mode. It's easy enough to switch back, though.

Re:Application Frame (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878239)

What kind of antique photoshop are you using? Photoshop 6 is single window, bro.

And! Another feature! (4, Funny)

DeathToBill (601486) | about 2 years ago | (#39878033)

I've just discovered a new key! Called an exclamation mark! On my keyboard! How did I miss it all these years!?!

The guy who wrote the new feature summary is just a bit too excitable for me to be comfortable with him at large in society.

2.6 for Windows (3, Insightful)

Jamu (852752) | about 2 years ago | (#39878061)

It's still stuck on version 2.6.12 for Windows. It's a shame they don't support a (binary) Windows download.

Typical M$ Shill/Astroturfer (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878177)

Well then compile it yourself. If you can't do that simple task then you are obviously are, like all Microshaft/Crapple/Failbook lusers, too fucking stupid to even exist let alone use a fucking computer.

Re:Typical M$ Shill/Astroturfer (1)

Lord Lode (1290856) | about 2 years ago | (#39878297)

No need to compile it yourself if you don't want to, let the community do the work for you and use your package manager. Or does Windows not have such a package manager?

... better then Adobe Photoshops window management (2)

cristiroma (606375) | about 2 years ago | (#39878071)

From TFA: "- Single window mode has arrived in GIMP ... - you’re now able to group layers and move/duplicate/make-visible/delete/etc many layers at once that you combined in the group" - extremely improved text tool - a brand new tool to transform an image on a polygon base - Take care of hundreds of brushes now and only show “flower” brushes, for example, by filtering them! - a new on-screen-indicatior that shows you how far an operation is to be finished (this is more intuitive than just the status bar progress text). - new slider widgets which allow you to use them in different very effective ways" In another words, welcome to Photoshop 7 without easter eggs

CMYK (4, Interesting)

virgnarus (1949790) | about 2 years ago | (#39878079)

True CMYK support yet? Nope. Looks like Photoshop is still the only option.

Re:CMYK (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878267)

so said the milkman.

Re:CMYK (3, Insightful)

Nadir (805) | about 2 years ago | (#39878407)

Even if GIMP supported CMYK, you'd still complain about it not being useful for professional work for some other reason (e.g. font rendering). GIMP is quite good for screen graphics, and that's what most people do.

Here comes the complaning... (5, Insightful)

vladilinsky (1071536) | about 2 years ago | (#39878081)

Every time there is anything posted about GIMP the entire comments consist of nothing but people complaining that it is not photoshop. What does it contribute to the discussion? We have all heard it before, many times. If you irrationally hate some piece of software, don't use it. If not enjoy the progression and the new features.

I for one, am glad that GIMP exists and want to thank all the people involved for all their hard work. It is not perfect but gets better with every release. I happily use it for all my photo manipulation needs.

Re:Here comes the complaning... (5, Insightful)

slim (1652) | about 2 years ago | (#39878137)

I tried Photoshop, and I didn't like it because it wasn't the GIMP.

I'm sure PS is fine, but once you've learned one UI it's difficult to adapt to a different one.

Re:Here comes the complaning... (0)

l0ungeb0y (442022) | about 2 years ago | (#39878315)

I suspect it to be more a case of your needs being as simplistic and basic as the Gimps feature set. Because PS blows Gimp out of the water in features and the differences in UI are not all that vast. So if you had any substantial amount of work beyond basic scaling, cropping and simple filtering, you'd have switched in a heart beat.

Re:Here comes the complaning... (1)

slim (1652) | about 2 years ago | (#39878421)

So if you had any substantial amount of work beyond basic scaling, cropping and simple filtering, you'd have switched in a heart beat.

I'm first to admit I don't have high end needs.

But "scaling cropping and simple filtering" is IrfanView territory. Very basic indeed. GIMP gives me layers, masks -- and scriptability way beyond my needs.

Re:Here comes the complaning... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878475)

I tried Photoshop, and I didn't like it because it wasn't the GIMP.

I'm sure PS is fine, but once you've learned one UI it's difficult to adapt to a different one.

Thats why MS pays coverments to teach only MS software in schools.

Re:Here comes the complaning... (3)

Desler (1608317) | about 2 years ago | (#39878151)

Well the summary is claiming it rivals Photoshop so it's only fair game to point out it's still missing features that Photoshop had in the early to mid 90s. Hell, even Paint.net has high-end features that The Gimp doesn't.

Re:Here comes the complaning... (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878233)

But the GIMP also has features neither Photoshop nor Paint.NET have. So, we can call it a tie ;-)

Re:Here comes the complaning... (2)

cristiroma (606375) | about 2 years ago | (#39878165)

Let me think ... because THEY compare themselves with Photoshop?? From TFA: " .... So it is even better then Adobe Photoshops window management now!" How about that?

Re:Here comes the complaning... (5, Insightful)

Wattos (2268108) | about 2 years ago | (#39878193)

Thank you for posting this.

You get a feature rich, stable, complete application for absolutely free and you still complain about it not being something else. Gimp may have a very steap learning curve and may lack some features of photoshop but it is still a solid package and we should be absolutely greatful that there are people out there who dedicate their time to provide the package to us for free.

I am absolutely sure that most people here, who complain about gimp not being photoshop, do not even have a valid license for photoshop. Additionally, if you think its so much worse, why dont you go ahead and try to make it better, its open source after all. But that would actually require you to do some work.

I am happy that gimp 2.8 finally got released. I continue to use and support it :)

Re:Here comes the complaning... (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878287)

Oh, you mean because it has new features that Paint Shop Pro had ever since version 7? And you do realize PSP 7 was released back in September of 2000? Now PSP and Photoshop both have features that are lightyears ahead of Gimp so yes the complains are valid. Oh that's right since Gimp is communist open-sores no one has the fucking right to criticize Gimp, everyone must bow down to the Open-Sores God RMS Titanic and the God of Communism Karl Marx. Is it any wonder Communist open-sores loses in the end. Watch as the unstable, memory & processor hogs Firefux and Fuckle Chrap disintegrate to the might of Internet Explorer.

Re:Here comes the complaning... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878309)

Indeed, I'm a big fan.

Eglish (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878099)

Mon, can tis artacle has eny wose engjus ins it?

Read liek 12 years old rote it.
I can has make thing read stnge AND amze peeps that no gay bash is envolved

how about a new name? (5, Funny)

larry bagina (561269) | about 2 years ago | (#39878103)

I want to use GIMP at work, but I need to get permission from my boss first. He's a into the leather scene so I'm afraid he'll get the wrong impression.

Re:how about a new name? (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878147)

Go ahead and ask, but be direct and forceful about it. Who knows, maybe you'll get that assistant you always wanted.

Re:how about a new name? Use name, not acronym (3, Insightful)

Jeng (926980) | about 2 years ago | (#39878463)

Rather than introduce it by it's acronym why not use it's full name when recommending it?

link to gimp.org? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878111)

Could you puhleese link to gimp.org? *headshake*

Nah... slashdot is really falling apart and going the way of the dodo right now...

A poll (2)

the_Bionic_lemming (446569) | about 2 years ago | (#39878123)

How many people here comparing Gimp to Photoshop have....Actually PAID for the licenses for all the version of photoshop they used?

I'm just happy there's a free alternative to photo editing out there. No, it may not be as slick as photoshop - but you don't have to steal gimp to use it.

Re:A poll (1)

Desler (1608317) | about 2 years ago | (#39878211)

The GIMP people themselves and the summary are the ones claiming it rivals Photoshop so whining about people pointing out that it's still behind in features of versions of Photoshop from 20 years ago is only fair.

Re:A poll (1)

Sarten-X (1102295) | about 2 years ago | (#39878365)

And that's my #1 reason for preferring GIMP to Photoshop. I rarely do any image editing these days, so usually I find myself installing GIMP onto a different computer than last time just so I can clean up one picture. Having something freely available that does what I need to get the job done is what I really care about, not a duplication tool that lets me add floors onto a building, or whatever features Photoshop's adding these days - the last time I used Photoshop was in the early 2000's (licensed, in a professional photo lab).

If you need absolutely every imaging algorithm discovered in the past 20 years, use Photoshop. If you just need to manipulate an image now, use GIMP. The two are comparable, yet different, in the way that a Dodge pickup truck is comparable to a Mercedes-Benz convertible.

Change the name, please! (3, Insightful)

mapuche (41699) | about 2 years ago | (#39878125)

The first unnatractive GIMP feature is its name. Please change it to something more appealing while describes what it does. Photoshop, Paintshop, Illustrator,Inkscape, Pencil, etc. are good names for similar programs, please find a more clever name.

Re:Change the name, please! (1)

CanHasDIY (1672858) | about 2 years ago | (#39878229)

The first unnatractive GIMP feature is its name. Please change it to something more appealing while describes what it does.

GNU image Manipulation Program isn't descriptive?

please find a more clever name.

Wait, do you want it to be clever, or descriptive?

Here's an idea: write your own image manipulation program, then you can name it whatever you want.

Re:Change the name, please! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878361)

He could fork the GIMP and just change the name strings and then go to all the work of marketing it. He wouldn't even need to program. I'm guessing the maintenance of the name change patch shouldn't be too difficult.

He'll quickly learn why you don't rename things.

Re:Change the name, please! (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878383)

They could always change it to the Photo and Illustration Manipulation Program, or PIMP.

Re:Change the name, please! (2)

mapuche (41699) | about 2 years ago | (#39878405)

>GNU image Manipulation Program isn't descriptive?

Yes, but appealing or even funny. Calling a creative tool like ths one gimp, dork, dick, etc is not very smart or creative.

>Wait, do you want it to be clever, or descriptive?

How about both, is it possible? we're all here smart people, I'm sure we can end with a clever name.

>Here's an idea: write your own image manipulation program, then you can name it whatever you want.

So I can't contribute with a positive opinion to make The GIMP (sigh!) more appealing to the masses?

Re:Change the name, please! (1)

Lord Lode (1290856) | about 2 years ago | (#39878251)

Hmm, Photoshop, Paintshop and Photo-Paint are already taken.

So maybe Imageshop, or Pictureshop Pro, or Picture-Photo?

Re:Change the name, please! (5, Funny)

Stuarticus (1205322) | about 2 years ago | (#39878317)

Hi, I've forked it for you, I thought a better name would be "paintbitch" please PM me for a download key.

Re:Change the name, please! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878355)

Can I edit pictures that aren't photos in Photoshop? If we're judging based on the name, I'll need something else to create graphics that weren't originally photos.

OMG Bold! And Italic! And Colors! (2, Interesting)

svyyn (530783) | about 2 years ago | (#39878199)

Now it is possible to change text inside the bounding text box and also use certain styles! For example select a word and press a “Bold” or “Italic” button. You can also change the size, line-height and font! Not just that – meanwhile it is also possible to change the color of certain words and characters.
This feature is absolutely great!

Bold, italic, and colors!? Is this a joke?

Open Source Project Releases (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878215)

Along with the new version number, years in dev, and list of features, I'd like to see these projects list how many man-hours were actually spent.

Yo0 fail #it (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878249)

in time. For all give 3SD credit

when will someone build the damn windows binaries? (1)

DragonTHC (208439) | about 2 years ago | (#39878281)

I'd love to use 2.8, but I'm not going to build it from source.

Someone needs to build the windows binaries already.

Impressive Summary (0)

El Royo (907295) | about 2 years ago | (#39878363)

Submitter managed heroically to not mention what GIMP was in the whole summary or what products it compared to. Yes, I know what it is but there's no excuse for a summary not to at least mention what the damn software does.

Still waiting on one particular key feature... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#39878491)

Does it have cmyk support yet?

Load More Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...