Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

CIPS Chimes In On Internet Predators Act

timothy posted more than 2 years ago | from the not-the-predators-you-were-looking-for dept.

Canada 39

alphabet26 writes "The Canadian Information Processing Society has formally responded to the Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act introduced in February of this year. Bill C-30 would grant authorities extended powers to monitor and track Canadians online. In the statement CIPS recommends that the Government of Canada 'prohibit access to personal information, related records/data, content, communications or records of internet use without the safeguard of a warrant.' CIPS is a non-profit organization that represents Canadian IT professionals and is a member of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP)."

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

I'm really glad (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40194321)

That Erik Estrada is involved in this important issue. The other guy from CHIPS is great, too.

Re:I'm really glad (1)

flyneye (84093) | more than 2 years ago | (#40196283)

No, Miss Latella, that's CIPS not CHIPS, but Erik has been spotted involved in other issues closer to the Mexican border. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CO8vBVUaKvk [youtube.com] Big bust outside Driftwood ,TX turns out they were abusing pepper.

On the other hand, in this Kansas town, a local 12 yr. old went missing with her internet boyfriend 20 from Canada, caught in Michigan on their way back, just yesterday. http://www.kansas.com/2012/06/01/2356613/amber-alert-issued-in-michigan.html [kansas.com] Hmm, kidnapping, sex with child, I suspect he's going to end up doing time in the state supermax. Guess where? http://www.doc.ks.gov/facilities/edcf [ks.gov] That's right, in the town he got the kid from. That's where they put P.C.(protective custody, aka punk city) little child molester mutants so they don't get punked in the general pop of other Kansas prisons. Supermax, where they get to walk around in the yard for a different hour a day with all the other little bitches so the bad old violent criminals and lifers they keep too don't pwn them in the yard. Bet he sleeps sound with Dennis Rader close at hand, eh? I bet he ends up wearing a 'depends' anyway.

I agree with goat farts (1)

For a Free Internet (1594621) | more than 2 years ago | (#40194371)

Goat farts are the best kind of goat farts. Those in the know, know that goat farts are goat farts for BARNES AND NOBERL'S "NOIK" for the future of books, e-books, and i-books. Goat fartyt on your head this beautifyul day, my friends! Praise the codfeee!!!! It is goat fat fart of goat, the one and true andone only per customirjenkm,,,,,,oijsapgsa[re0/. goatfart on slasyeh dotiuj. Youare my friend, HI!!!!!

Re:I agree with goat farts (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40194395)

wha..why?

WHY?!!

Clean up your act! (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40194379)

Nearly four months ago, I noticed that my internet connection was very sluggish. Eventually getting fed up with it, I began to seek out software that would speed up the gigabits in my router. After an hour of searching, I found what at first appeared to be a very promising piece of software. Not only did it claim it would speed up my internet connection, but that it would overclock my power supply, speed up my gigabits, and remove any viruses from my computer! "This is a fantastic opportunity that I simply can't pass up," I thought. I immediately downloaded the software and began the installation, all the while laughing like a small child. I was highly anticipating a future where the speed of my internet connection would leave everyone else's in the dust.

I was horribly, horribly naive. Immediately upon the completion of the software's installation, various messages popped up on my screen about how I needed to buy software to remove a virus that I wasn't aware I had from a software company I'd never once heard of. The strange software also blocked me from doing anything except buying the software it was advertising. Being that I was a computer whiz (I had taken a computer essentials class in high school that taught me how to use Microsoft Office, and was quite adept at accessing my Facebook account), I was immediately able to conclude that the software I'd downloaded was, in fact, a virus, and that it was slowing down my gigabits at an exponential rate. "I can't let this insanity proceed any further," I thought.

As I was often called a computer genius, I was confident at the time that I could get rid of the virus with my own two hands. I tried numerous things: restarting the computer, pressing random keys on the keyboard, throwing the mouse across the room, and even flipping an orange switch on the back of the tower and turning the computer back on. My efforts were all in vain; the virus persisted, and my gigabits were running slower than ever! "This cannot be! What is this!? I've never once seen such a vicious virus in my entire life!" I was dumbfounded that I, a computer genius, was unable to remove the virus using the methods I described. Upon coming to terms with my failure, I decided to take my computer to a PC repair shop for repair.

I drove to a nearby computer repair shop and entered the building with my computer in hand. The inside of the building was quite large, neat, and organized, and the employees all seemed very kind and knowledgeable. They laughed upon hearing my embarrassing story, and told me that they saw this kind of thing on a daily basis. They then accepted the job, and told me that in the worst case, it'd be fixed in three days from now. I left with a smile, and felt confident in my decision to leave the computer repairs to the experts.

A week later, they still hadn't called back. Visibly angry, I tried calling them countless times, but not a single time did they answer the phone. Their negligence and irresponsibility infuriated me, and sent me into a state of insanity that caused me to punch a gigantic hole in the wall. Being that I would require my computer for work soon, I decided to head over to the computer repair shop to find out exactly what the problem was.

Upon entering the building, I was shocked by the state of its interior; it looked as if a tornado had tore through the entire building! Countless broken computers were scattered all about the floor, desks were flipped over, the walls had holes in them, there was a puddle of blood on the floor, and worst of all, I saw that my computer was sitting in the middle of the room laying on its side! Absolutely unforgivable! I soon noticed one of the employees sitting behind one of the tipped over desks (the one that had previously had the cash register on top of it); he was shaking uncontrollably and sobbing. Despite being furious about my computer being tipped over, seeing him in that state still managed to make me less unforgiving. I decided to ask him what happened.

A few moments passed where the entire room was silent and nothing was said. Eventually, he pointed at my computer and said to me, "The virus... it cannot be stopped! Cannot be stopped! Cannot be stopped!" Realizing that he was trying to tell me that they were unable to repair my computer (the task I'd given them), I flew into a blind fury and beat him senseless. Not caring about what would happen to him any longer, I collected my computer, ignored the bodies of the two other employees that had committed suicide, and left the building. After a few moments of pondering about what to do and clearing my head, I theorized that their failure to repair my computer probably simply meant that they were unqualified to do the job, and decided to take my computer to another computer repair shop.

I repeated that same process about four times before finally giving up. Each time I took it to a PC repair shop, the result was the same: all the employees either went completely insane, or they committed suicide. Not a single person was able to even do so much as damage the virus. I was able to talk some sense into one of the employees that had gone mad and got them to tell me how they were attempting to fix the problem. They told me that they tried everything from reinstalling the operating system to installing another operating system and trying to get rid of the virus on the other one, but absolutely all of it was to no avail. Having seen numerous attempts by professionals to remove the virus end in failure, I managed to delude myself into believing that my first failure was simply a fluke and that I was the only one on the planet qualified to fix the computer. With renewed vigor, I once again took up the frighteningly dangerous task of defeating the evil, nightmarish virus once and for all with my own two hands.

In my attempts to fix the problem, I'd even resorted to buying another computer. However, the virus used its WiFi capabilities to hack into the gigabits of my new computer and infect it. Following each failed attempt, I grew more and more depressed. I had already beaten my wife and children five times in order to relieve some of my stress, but even that (which had become my only pleasure after failing to remove the virus the first time), did nothing for me any longer. That's right: my last remaining pleasure in life had stopped being able to improve my mood, and I had not a single thing left that I cared about. I sank into a bottomless ocean of depression, barricaded myself in my room, and cried myself to sleep for days on end. Overcome with insanity, vengefulness, and despair, there is not a single doubt that if this had continued for much longer, I would have committed suicide.

One day, it suddenly happened: while I was right in the middle of habitually crying myself to sleep in the middle of the day, I heard a thunderous roar outside, followed by the sound of a large number of people screaming. When I peered outside my window to find out what all the commotion was about, the scene before me closely resembled that of a God descending from the heavens themselves! I gazed in awe at the godlike figure that was descending from the heavens, and so did the dozens of individuals that had gathered in my backyard. For a few moments, everyone was speechless. Then, they started shouting predictions about what they thought the figure was. "Is it a bird!?" "Is it a plane!?" But, despite not ever having seen it before, I knew just how inaccurate their predictions were, and began to speak the name of the heroic figure.

However, my sentence was cut off when, like a superhero coming to save the unfortunate victim from the evil villain, MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] flew into my house and began the eradication of the virus. MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] was able to completely eliminate in minutes the exact same virus that over ten PC repair professionals were unable to remove after weeks of strenuous attempts! Wow! Such a thing! I simply couldn't believe that MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] was so miraculously efficient that it was able to destroy the virus in less than 500 milliseconds! MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] totally, completely, and utterly saved me from a lifetime of despair!

My wife's response? "MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] is outstanding! My husband's computer is running faster than ever! MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] came through with flying colours where no one else could! MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] totally cleaned up my husband's system, and increased his speed! I highly, highly recommend that you use MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] !"

After witnessing just how wonderful MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] is, I insist that you use MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] when you need to fix all the gigabits on your computer! MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] will completely eradicate any viruses on your computer, speed up your internet connection, overclock your gigabits and speed, and give you some peace of mind! MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] is simply outstanding!

But even if you're not having any visible problems with your computer, it's highly likely that you're still in a situation where MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] could help you. MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] will get rid of any viruses or wireless interfaces that are hidden deep within your computer's bootloader. MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] will also speed up your computer to such a degree that it'll be even faster than when you first bought it! You must try MyCleanPC [mycleanpc.com] for yourself so that you can be overclocking your speed with the rest of us!

MyCleanPC: For a Cleaner, Safer PC. [mycleanpc.com]

Correct website is cips.ca (4, Informative)

awehttam (779031) | more than 2 years ago | (#40194391)

The correct website for CIPS is cips.ca [www.cips.ca] , not cips.com as linked in the article.

The Progression (5, Interesting)

lazarus (2879) | more than 2 years ago | (#40194405)

It's interesting the way that we (as a collective civilization) have gone from attempting to block dangerous activity on the Internet for children, to creating safe "playgrounds" for them, to giving up completely on user-based controls and instead just doing semi-autonomous monitoring of country-wide Internet traffic looking for "dangerous" on-line activity.

We so desperately want to make our children's safety a government problem so we don't have to do anything ourselves and have someone to blame/sue if they are ever in danger. Governments desperately want to exercise their control over us because that is what governments all seem to move towards at the end of the day (taking their responsibility to keep us safe a little too much to heart (or just an extension of the power play that people in the business of government seem drawn towards)).

How is a minority of responsible citizens ever to stand in the the way of the majority that want to be controlled and the governments who are willing to control them? I wish I knew the answer. It doesn't appear that a democratic system of government is enough.

Re:The Progression (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40194555)

Well, you're first mistake here is in believing that we live in a democratic society. The Oath of Allegiance of the United States makes it clear that they, and so anyone who models their government on them, are actually a republic. The citizens do not get a say in passing the legislation of the country, only the elected representatives and they don't have to follow what they promise once they're safely ensconced in office. The only time they'll come back and listen to the people is to find out what they need to promise so they'll be elected again. Unfortunately, the bulk of the population's memory is so short that they don't remember that the same representative broke all their promises last election and that means they have a good chance of being elected again as long as they make the right promises.

Eventually, if we're going to have a free internet as we have been used to and is slowly being closed off and censored, it's going to have to be in the form of independent dark meshes run by criminals who will be defined as criminals merely because they are running a network that the government cannot monitor. It will be a little like the old small power pirate radio stations of the old days.

Re:The Progression (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40194855)

He's not mistaken at all about democracy. We live in a democracy. It has become progressively more democratic over time. In a republic, there may be an oligarchy at the top, but they have to move against the representatives in the republic who are generally more well-informed than the average person and who have their own interests at stake too. In a democracy, you only have to fool a majority of people, most of whom will not take the time to understand the issues and who are easily duped. In our case, our democratic republic has become increasing more democratic (such that, for instance, Senators are elected directly by the people). Representatives controlled by the people are easily controlled by an oligarchy at the top because the people are easily duped.

Re:The Progression (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40195641)

If you're an a place where representatives are listening to the people and voting in accordance with their wishes then I wish I could live on the planet you're living on. I see representatives who promise, much deliver little, often hide unpopular legislation or spending inside of other bills and even cross the house in order to make sure they're on the winning side. No, this isn't a democracy.

As for whether Canada is a democracy, republic or oligarchy, let's look at our Canadian Oath of Allegiance ...

"I, [name], do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors. So help me God."

No mention of democracy, republic or any other than a plain monarchy. It's a pledge to a single individual, not a constitution, country or an other abstract political idea.

Sorry, not a democracy. It's all just window dressing.

Re:The Progression (1)

YodasEvilTwin (2014446) | more than 2 years ago | (#40213211)

TBH, I think we'd be better off if Elizabeth II were running things. At least as far as matters of sovreignty and personal dignity go. The economy's doing alright, we just need to stop mimicking US policies (copyright, TSA-style gropings, etc.).

Re:The Progression (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40194909)

We need to hire mercenaries and conquer an island nation, turn it into a dictatorship (or simply replace the dictatorship with another), form a constitution which prohibits censorship or the creation of new law thereof which prohibits the banning/censoring/limiting/deterring/saftifying (created to "protect") of anything which can be created on paper, digital, or equivalent communicative form. No person shall be limited, restrained, held, with or without there consent of there free movement under any conditions whatsoever with one minor exception.

Those who wish to have such laws passed in violation of said constitutional protections shall be made to move to a tiny little area on said island. No government/health/food/school or any other necessity should be built within this area. No person should be forced to live, move, eat, sleep, shop, jailed, in this area. What this does is force violators of the law within said area out of said area. Nothing can be built on the protected area without there being an equivalent on the almost lawless area.

Then there could be a little bit larger area with a bit more law.

So you end up with three areas. The largest area is basically completely unrestricted, the 2nd area is mostly unrestricted, and the third area is for nutcases who like to be controlled. :)

Re:The Progression (1)

SuricouRaven (1897204) | more than 2 years ago | (#40195619)

Slight problem: Eventually, that dictator is going to die. Even if you get a good, uncorruptable, competant idealist once, how are you going to ensure you can get them time after time for hundreds of years?

All you need to know (4, Interesting)

TubeSteak (669689) | more than 2 years ago | (#40194443)

The bill does not mention children, or internet predators, other than in its title

Re:All you need to know (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40194575)

And there was an EARLIER omnibus bill that's crime related that passed just a few months ago. One of the very few good measures it contained was codifying the ability for police to get internet-related information in emergency situations like where there's imminent harm to children, but still with judicial oversight.

All of the "think of the children" stuff was fulfilled in March. This legislation is about passing sweeping state surveillance powers that Himmler and Stalin could only wish they'd had.

Re:All you need to know (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40194581)

That's true, the bill was renamed because the government thought they could slip it in under the radar by titling it such that it seemed to be "protecting the children". It's always amazing to think what rights people will give away if they think they are protecting the children.

You'll soon find that it be suggested that parents turn their children over to government run residential schools so they'll be protected from all the evils out in the world. Looking back at the residential schools run for the aboriginals, I already know how well that will work out. Of course, as it would concentrate virtually of their generation in a close setting it will be easier to eliminate them by pandemics in the schools when the population reduction programs start.

Re:All you need to know (3, Interesting)

arthurpaliden (939626) | more than 2 years ago | (#40195481)

The title was change to its current form the night before it was tabled.

Re:All you need to know (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40196745)

I heard it initially changed to "Protect Canadians from Indiscreet Philanderers Act", but Vic Toews thought it sent the wrong message.

Don't be fooled! (1, Insightful)

Daniel Dvorkin (106857) | more than 2 years ago | (#40194473)

CIPS really stands for Child Internet Porn Society. They're clearly a bunch of pedophiles, because otherwise, why would they be trying in any way to limit efforts to PROTECT THE CHIIILDREN?!?

The bill is unconstitutional (5, Informative)

afidel (530433) | more than 2 years ago | (#40194497)

Since the Canadian supreme court ruled in April [huffingtonpost.ca] that even in exigent circumstances that the government must obtain a warrant the bill is unconstitutional on its face. This is just like the US Congress passing CDA, COPA et al, it's pandering to the conservative right even though anyone with a brain has to know it won't stand up to judicial review.

Re:The bill is unconstitutional (1)

tlhIngan (30335) | more than 2 years ago | (#40199227)

Since the Canadian supreme court ruled in April that even in exigent circumstances that the government must obtain a warrant the bill is unconstitutional on its face. This is just like the US Congress passing CDA, COPA et al, it's pandering to the conservative right even though anyone with a brain has to know it won't stand up to judicial review.

Yes, but until it's RULED unconstitutional, it's the law of the land. One needs to have a lawsuit filed against them and hope to pass the argument that the law is unlawful up before it'll be considered, which takes time and money.

Someone will have to go with the defense that there's no evidence obtained as it was obtained unlawfully and convince the judge that the law really should be reviewed against the judgement.

And that can be a long time - probably at least 5 years or so before the arguments are heard, while everyone else either rots in jail or settles.

ummmmmm (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40199777)

WRONG....law passes you file an injunction in court that until such time as there is a ruling that , the law as is cannot void current charter of rights as blatant as this....ITS very very clear in the charter. THIS is HARD to ask for legally in a civilized land. Sorry....and me thinks a sane judge would grant a stay/injunction of that law until it was reworded to include a warrant OR was heard and struck down by the appropriate court.

Costs a bit a doh but im game to do it ...i have some spare time to waste tax payers money on a law that SHOULD have included oversight....that is what a warrant allows for and if the example of above where a minister abuses warrants that can become an issue to get them ....

Most judges actually take there jobs seriously....not like the 16$ a orange juice oda ministers and helicopter riding taxi service.

Why not a separate network? (5, Interesting)

aaaaaaargh! (1150173) | more than 2 years ago | (#40194537)

Why not just create a separate network for children only? With separate browsers, separate trafffic?

The internet is no place for children anyway. It should be 18+ (or 16+, or whatever politicians and their voters desire) like alcohol and tobacco, and it could simply be prohibited for parents to allow their children to be on the "regular" internet in the same sense as it is prohibited to hand out large quantities of vodka to 8 year old kids. I fail to see why adults should be punished, surveilled, and harrassed by authorities just because of a few irresponsible parents. Technically, it's no problem, you can even build the net on top of the regular internet, make phones and tablets with "kid network" browsers (even more sales!), etc.

The added benefit of separate networks would be that kids can no longer look up their homework solutions and there are no longer whiney little pricks on game servers for 18+ games.

Re:Why not a separate network? (-1, Troll)

buchner.johannes (1139593) | more than 2 years ago | (#40194639)

(Child) pornography on the internet is a arousal addiction -- you always need new different ( http://www.ted.com/talks/zimchallenge.html [ted.com] ).

This demand is met by some supply, which makes children (somewhere) suffer. But /. cannot even accept child pornography is a problem.

Re:Why not a separate network? (2, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40194951)

Child porn and child molestation existed long before the internet existed. It exists about as long as children exist. Whenever a law that cripples privacy needs to be passed, the government calls it an important tool to combat either terrorists or pedophiles. Now we have reached the point that protecting our children by banning dirty cartoons as child porn, and locking children up for producing child porn for taking a pictures of themselves... way to protect out children. Don't forget to arrest everybody that played doctor while being underage...

Re:Why not a separate network? (0, Flamebait)

bmo (77928) | more than 2 years ago | (#40195021)

But /. cannot even accept child pornography is a problem.

So leave Slashdot.

Just get the fuck out if you think we're all pedophile coddlers.

Fucking seriously. Take your insult, print it out on oaktag, fold it until it is all sharp corners and shove it squarely up your ass.

If it was possible to punch you in the nose through the fiber, I would.

--
BMO

Re:Why not a separate network? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40213595)

>If it was possible to punch you in the nose through the fiber, I would.

sure you would, toughguy.

instead of mitigating your real-life sense of powerlessness by making idiotic statements online, use the fucking websites controls, foe him, and do something more than take up space.

dont like it? go fuck yourself.

Yeah sure, no one would ever lie online (2)

witherstaff (713820) | more than 2 years ago | (#40196011)

People have been pretending to be a different age or gender on the 'net for a long long time. Everyone having digital cams has done away with some of this but in the 90s early 00s it could be a surprise meeting someone from online. Thank god I never ran across a different gender, realizing that a picture someone put up was probably taken 10+ years ago or 150 pounds ago were enough of shockers.

In all seriousness I dislike any legislation that tries to impose morality. You know some books have some nasty things in them, should we bad kids from books? The bible talks about incest and sodomy and having emissions like like a donkey, should I dare let a kid read that? Even Over the Air TV can have some non-kid friendly things on it.

As to technically it's a huge problem. You can't have a walled garden of random users otherwise how would you stop a single parent from using a kid account and breaking the system? If a parent is irresponsible that's their fault, why should I be paying tax dollars for cops to be trolling as 'CuteGirl18' just to ensure someone on the new network wasn't also trolling? Besides in the studies I've read the vast majority of child abuse happens by those the kid is close to and not random internet people. If a parent really wants to lowjack their kids they can already. Disney I think has cell phones the parents can setup to only call numbers they put in, and are GPS trackers. There are various kid friendly software browsers that have been out there for a long time. Netnanny, etc. Solutions already exist let's not make more laws that require more big brother oversight. It's worked so well with the "war on drugs".

I hate how politicians exploit the children (3, Interesting)

elucido (870205) | more than 2 years ago | (#40194545)

They always use child porn and fear mongering and pedophilia to get any bill they want passed without review. They know the word pedophile shuts down all rational centers of a parents brain and allows the politician to essentially do anything to them and their children so long as it's in the name of protecting them from pedophiles.

What I cannot understand ... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40194611)

... is how the legislators of the day think that these obnoxious changes will not affect their own children in the future.

One possibility is that somewhere in these new laws are hidden clauses that exempt certain members or classes in society. Would this be considered another case of the 1% taking care of themselves at the expense of the 99%?

Re:What I cannot understand ... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40194979)

Privileged egoists are assholes even to their own children. But their kids will have lawyers and connections and won't be affected too much by any law. Of course when it comes time for them to be in charge they will follow their parents' example and shit on their own children even more. The spiral of abuse...

Ridiculous (5, Insightful)

steveaustin1971 (1094329) | more than 2 years ago | (#40195039)

This week, Public Safety Minister Vic Toews said that Bill C-30 would have allowed police to catch a killer who had posted his killing and dismemberment online. He wants us to believe that the fact that police need to take a few minutes to get a warrant prevented them from pursuing this guy who had posted the killing online and had for years posted his animal cruelty vids. Problem is this: People DID report it to the police who ignored it. If they had chosen to investigate they could have found him quite easily, but they chose not to use the rather robust powers they ALREADY have to investigate. Bill C-30 only really gives the government (even non-police entities) the ability to snoop on citizens without need for a warrant or even a suspicion of illegal activity without leaving any sort of paper trail or accountability. The current government has already been found to be hiring people to spread propaganda on forums and scour facebook to find people that might not agree with their policies and remove them from rallies. We should trust people like that to not abuse their power? A government embroiled in a voter fraud scandal, several finance scandals and the FIRST Canadian government to have been found in contempt of Parliament? No thank you Mr. Toews.

constant surveillance (3, Insightful)

amoeba1911 (978485) | more than 2 years ago | (#40195321)

Would you install cameras in every street corner, every home, every bedroom so you can watch everyone at all times to prevent child porn? I think everyone would answer with a resounding NO, because anyone can see it is a clear violation of people's privacy. Why would you do the equivalent of that online?

The Real Problem with Bill C-30 (3, Interesting)

arthurpaliden (939626) | more than 2 years ago | (#40195453)

Bill C-30 Sections 33/34:

Vic's Asst. 1: So have we had any luck tracing that person who sent those emails or who he is working with. You know the other people he has been in contact with.

Vic's Asst. 2: Nope. All we have is the email address but that does give us the name of their ISP.

Vic's Asst. 1: OK so get a warrant for that ISP and find who it was that sent it along with who he is working with.

Vic's Asst. 2: Can't do that. What was done was not a criminal act.

Vic's Asst. 3: Well then how about this. We get the Minister to appoint someone we trust as his agent as per Section 33 to check out this ISP for compliance to Bill C-30. They go there and then once they are in the ISP's premises we use Section 34, which states he can make copies of 'any' information found at the site regardless of where it is stored, to get everything. That gives us all the ISP's user account data as well as the contents of all current user emails, instant messages, voice over IP conversations as well as all the system backups which will contain everything even if has been deleted by the users. Then we bring it all back here and go through it at our leisure looking for 'compliance violations'.

Vic's Asst. 1: And that is legal?

Vic's Asst. 3:Getting it yes, although politically it could embarrass the Minister but then hey, isn't what Senate appointments are for.

Vic's Asst. 1: Ok then, works for me.

No Warrant is the whole point (1)

Maow (620678) | more than 2 years ago | (#40195891)

In the statement CIPS recommends that the Government of Canada 'prohibit access to personal information, related records/data, content, communications or records of internet use without the safeguard of a warrant.'

Not having a warrant is the whole point of the bill.

How else can Pierre Poutine scour the records of opposition candidates in order to smear them during election campaigns? Maybe find a damning email sent to the leader of the opposition by ... Pierre Poutine?

They had a 2 year long negative attack ad campaign against Ignatief prior to the last election and have already begun one against Bob Rae.

They just want to be ready for the next election -- they'll have to be a bit more careful with their election fraud this time -- but they will do what ever is in their power to win.

Free and fair elections are a thing of the past.

Quebec had their "Quiet Revolution", Canada has had a "Quiet Coup".

How to join CIPS (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40196517)

So does anyone know how to join CIPS? I've been working in the industry for 25 years and know nobody who is a member to refer me. Is it that exclusive a club?

Re:How to join CIPS (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40198055)

You require a university or college degree from an institution in Canada. And yes it appears to be an exclusive club much like the organization responsible for CISSP. Exclusivity breeds incest and therefore explains CIPS' position w.r.t. Bill C-30. [ /sarcasm only half in jest ]

Re:How to join CIPS (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40218119)

CIPS isn't exclusive. Anyone can join and you don't need a member to refer you. http://www.cips.ca/membership

beatles- all we are saying ..... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40199751)

beatles- all we are saying .....is give a warrant a chance.....

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?