Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Google Scrambles To Restore Google Talk From Outage

timothy posted about 2 years ago | from the cloudy-out-there-today dept.

Communications 85

alphadogg writes "Google Talk, a desktop and mobile text and voice chat service used by many Google Gmail customers, suffered a widespread outage Thursday morning that the company said was affecting 'a majority of users.' The outage, first reported by Google a little before 7am eastern time, was being restored about 4 hours later, according to Google. Meanwhile, users of the downed cloud service took to Twitter and other avenues to voice their displeasure." Update: 07/26 16:24 GMT by T : wiedzmin writes "It looks like Twitter is experiencing an outage. leaving users unable to access the site on Thursday morning. I wonder if it's related to the Google Talk outage at all, but one thing is for sure — this has stopped a slew of complaints about Google Talk on Twitter. If Twitter is down, where do you tweet about that?"

cancel ×

85 comments

Don't care! (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778145)

Don't care!

Meanwhile (5, Informative)

benjymous (69893) | about 2 years ago | (#40778187)

Twitter seems to have gone down too

http://status.twitter.com/ [twitter.com]

Mass internet implosion?

Re:Meanwhile (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778217)

Twitter being down is not news!

Re:Meanwhile (3)

davidbrit2 (775091) | about 2 years ago | (#40778473)

The machine stops.

Re:Meanwhile (2)

Z00L00K (682162) | about 2 years ago | (#40780571)

Just fall back to IRC when Twitter dies.

Re:Meanwhile (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778727)

Yes im sure Twitter and Google Talk are running on the same machine

Re:Meanwhile (2)

aix tom (902140) | about 2 years ago | (#40779205)

It all runs in "The Cloud".

So maybe someone tripped over the cable [xkcd.com] ?

Re:Meanwhile (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40779389)

So maybe someone tripped over the cable [xkcd.com] ?

This reminds me of a moonlander game clone I wrote with my dad in the early 1980s. It showed 3 numbers on screen: height, speed and fuel. When the height became zero, the speed had to be below 10 and the height had to be zero before (or immediatly after) the fuel was zero.

One day my nephew was playing this game. He got so encited that he started stamping his feet and he hit the power cable. The power outage prevented him from crashing on the moon.

Re:Meanwhile (1)

stevegee58 (1179505) | about 2 years ago | (#40778851)

Feer the whale of fail.

Re:Meanwhile (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40781445)

Too bad the story is about Google Talk and not Twitter. If it was, the response would be easy: "And nothing of value was lost."

Er... isn't twitter down? (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778191)

My tweeters are not going through to the twitterwebmachine, I think the hour of the failwhale is upon us.

Re:Er... isn't twitter down? (1)

benjymous (69893) | about 2 years ago | (#40778215)

Yup, Twitter's engineers are on it, apparently : http://status.twitter.com/ [twitter.com]

Re:Er... isn't twitter down? (5, Insightful)

thePowerOfGrayskull (905905) | about 2 years ago | (#40779455)

What else would they say? "our engineers are sitting on their collective asses and hoping this will soon resolve itself"?

Good to know... (3, Insightful)

AngryDeuce (2205124) | about 2 years ago | (#40778197)

And to think I only spent 20 minutes this morning wondering what the fuck I managed to break this time...

Working fine for me again, btw. Whatever they broke seems fixed unless they're rolling it out in stages...

Re:Good to know... (2)

Roberticus (1237374) | about 2 years ago | (#40778317)

Same here. I wish I knew of a faster way to get from "The Internet is down!" to "Google Talk and Twitter were out at the same time." But I've become so reliant on the Internet for info that it's a chicken-and-egg problem to try and troubleshoot outages.

Re:Good to know... (5, Funny)

Sulphur (1548251) | about 2 years ago | (#40778341)

And to think I only spent 20 minutes this morning wondering what the fuck I managed to break this time...

Working fine for me again, btw. Whatever they broke seems fixed unless they're rolling it out in stages...

It is being phased in 140 bytes at a time.

No UTF-8 then? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778591)

One byte per character isn't enough for some of us, you imperialistic clod!

Re:Good to know... (0, Troll)

cpu6502 (1960974) | about 2 years ago | (#40778765)

When software-related stuff just stops working after I've changed nothing, I usually assume it's the website that went down. It's a bit shocking that people "complained" about it. Phones do stop working from time-to-time. Even POTS only has 99.995% reliability not 100%.

Of course most people aren't logical..... there's a new photo going-round facebook that claims Obama made gas prices go down, and therefore we should re-elect him. Problem: Historical data shows prices went upward from ~$2.70 when the president started. But explaining this to the photo posters usually gets shotdown ("You're just a racist" is the typical comeback). Anyway it's illogical to expect Google Phone or Skype to have 100% reliability. Like any machine they break from time-to-time. No reason to complain about it.

Re:Good to know... (2, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778975)

Really? I would think the typical comeback would be that has proved were at an all-time high (over $4) in early 2008, at the tail end of the Bush administration, and only dropped to $2.70 at the 2009 inauguration because of the big economic collapse we had. But I guess anyone still voting Republican must have a pretty short memory!

Re:Good to know... (0)

cpu6502 (1960974) | about 2 years ago | (#40783629)

>>>and only dropped to $2.70 at the 2009 inauguration

Except that the gas price actually dropped to $2.70 during the last year of Bush's presidency. For Obama or his supporters to take credit for something that happened before Obama set foot in office makes no sense.

Re:Good to know... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40789017)

Oh, you wake up and started writing your daily blog on slashdot, political news for retards?

It happens...have a backup (3, Funny)

Overzeetop (214511) | about 2 years ago | (#40778305)

Patience...and a cell phone. I think we'll all live though it.

Re:It happens...have a backup (3, Insightful)

ilsaloving (1534307) | about 2 years ago | (#40778693)

What if your cell phone has a data-only plan and you rely on VOIP for your calls? :3

Re:It happens...have a backup (4, Insightful)

CanHasDIY (1672858) | about 2 years ago | (#40778833)

What if your cell phone has a data-only plan and you rely on VOIP for your calls? :3

Then you lose a few nerd points for not having a backup system ready and waiting.

Re:It happens...have a backup (-1, Troll)

cpu6502 (1960974) | about 2 years ago | (#40778849)

>>> :3

Nice chest.
Interesting you have have no mouth. ;-)

Re:It happens...have a backup (1)

Psychotic_Wrath (693928) | about 2 years ago | (#40779625)

If you rely on VOIP for your calls then you would be lucky to have Google Talk for your provider. I run a call center and we use a VOIP service. I have worked with several VOIP providers and they would be lucky if they only went down once a year. I use Vocalocity and they go down once every 3-4 months. 8*8 (8 by 8) goes down probably about half that.

If Google talk has been up for a couple years and if this is their first outage, well then I would say that they are the most reliable.

Re:It happens...have a backup (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40782433)

Gosh, what do folks expect for FREE!!!!! We use Google Voice with an Obi110 for well over a year now and absolutely love the fact that we don't pay a penny to use our regular phones to make free calls. The service has been excellent and I am willing to deal with an outage every once in awhile because after all its FREE!!!!!

News just in "Angry twitterers" flood G+ with..... (4, Insightful)

djsmiley (752149) | about 2 years ago | (#40778327)

And now they are flooding G+ complaining about Twitter.

People, free services owe you nothing.

Re:News just in "Angry twitterers" flood G+ with.. (2)

flagg9483 (940242) | about 2 years ago | (#40778405)

If you're a business paying for the Google suite then they certainty do.

Re:News just in "Angry twitterers" flood G+ with.. (2, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778443)

Nothing is free, if I was an advertiser who paid good money for mined twitter data or injected (sponsored) content I'd be pissed right now, let alone the users.

Re:News just in "Angry twitterers" flood G+ with.. (1)

Bill, Shooter of Bul (629286) | about 2 years ago | (#40781819)

Its not like this is the first time its been down or anything. If your business model is tied to twitter never going down, you deserve to go bankrupt.

Re:News just in "Angry twitterers" flood G+ with.. (1)

i kan reed (749298) | about 2 years ago | (#40778589)

No, but nor do you owe them anything. You can still leave their services if you want. They want users for some reason, so if you leave, you're taking something they want. It obviously isn't much, but that's the extent of your implicit agreement.

Re:News just in "Angry twitterers" flood G+ with.. (1)

Aeros (668253) | about 2 years ago | (#40778763)

People..its free services, get back to work and do your jobs and stop screwing around on the twitter thing

Re:News just in "Angry twitterers" flood G+ with.. (2)

0racle (667029) | about 2 years ago | (#40778899)

That doesn't mean you can't complain. It means there is no one at the companies that you have issue with to complain to directly.

Re:News just in "Angry twitterers" flood G+ with.. (1)

Hatta (162192) | about 2 years ago | (#40779135)

People owe "free" services nothing in return.

Re:News just in "Angry twitterers" flood G+ with.. (3, Funny)

yurtinus (1590157) | about 2 years ago | (#40779395)

At least they're using G+ for *something*, right?

Re:News just in "Angry twitterers" flood G+ with.. (2)

CrashandDie (1114135) | about 2 years ago | (#40781199)

We use (paid for) Google Apps at work, to provide us with all the basic tools our employees need: mail, calendar, documents, and last, but most definitely not least, chat.

The company is divided over multiple countries, most of those in the same time zone. GTalk has been acting funny for the past 24 hours (messages not going through, having to kill the phone app so the browser one would work, etc), but around lunch time today (Europe) things went south.

To give you an idea, most people here _only_ use GTalk to communicate with others on other sites. Calling is invasive (ironic for a VoIP company), and not everyone has each other's number (nobody but a few know about the company-wide directory), email is easier to miss, and not handy for quick one liners.

As soon as GTalk went down, we simply fired up another VM and installed the hybrid ircd, and qwebirc client. It only took two emails to get everyone organised in the proper (team-based) channels, and enforced people to use their regular login so people could /msg each other easily. I believe a few teams are actually considering keeping irc as a more permanent solution, considering the ease with which they can communicate as a single team, which is still a massive pain with GTalk.

All that, to say, some companies pay for GTalk, and actually rely on it. If it weren't for our ability to create a semi-viable alternative quickly, I'm guessing a lot of pain would have ensued.

Oh, and before you mention Skype: Fuck 'em.

Re:News just in "Angry twitterers" flood G+ with.. (1)

Ichijo (607641) | about 2 years ago | (#40781219)

People, free services owe you nothing.

As they say, "if you aren't paying for it, then you are the product."

When we're the product, we should all demand a high quality service as payment.

I didn't have a problem (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778399)

I was on it before 11 AM & didn't have any issues.

No Big Deal (1)

erdos-bacon sandwich (2676113) | about 2 years ago | (#40778401)

M_Zuckerberg: These numbers don't look so good - be sure to inflate earnings by 10% before reporting!
big_CFO_man did not receive your chat.

Jitsi (1)

Hatta (162192) | about 2 years ago | (#40778417)

Jitsi's still up.

You know you're old when... (5, Insightful)

gishzida (591028) | about 2 years ago | (#40778445)

USENET was social networking

I have a hard time understanding why people would whine about an outage from a free service. As for "paying customers" -- what were you thinking? You're getting exactly what you paid for a cheap service level. This isn't Old Ma Bell. There is no non-carrier VoIP service has the service level of Ma Bell's wired network. .
Remember that "fast and cheap" is also = "prone to outage"

Re:You know you're old when... (1)

Reasonable Facsimile (2478544) | about 2 years ago | (#40778729)

I miss the salad days of alt.peeves

Re:You know you're old when... (2)

Hatta (162192) | about 2 years ago | (#40779153)

It's worth pointing out that USENET never goes down. Your USENET server might go down, but you can use another one.

Re:You know you're old when... (1)

Jawnn (445279) | about 2 years ago | (#40780481)

USENET was social networking

I have a hard time understanding why people would whine about an outage from a free service. As for "paying customers" -- what were you thinking? You're getting exactly what you paid for a cheap service level. This isn't Old Ma Bell. There is no non-carrier VoIP service has the service level of Ma Bell's wired network. .

Then again, neither does the current pile of LEC's (local exchange carriers). POTS or VOIP, they all still suck compared to the Ma Bell days. Then still again, we aren't paying almost a buck a minute for a cross-country phone call anymore either. Yes, young'n's, there was a time when that was the the case.

Re:You know you're old when... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40788087)

they discouraged NNTP claiming criminal activities so that Corps like google and m$ can mint advertisement money online.

now, they are trying to d the same with email by removing thick clients like thunderbird, ms outlook express /mail, etc.

watchout, in future email will get criminalized.

Not just Google (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778479)

AT&T is having problems with at least IP Flex services. Anyone elese experiencing these problems? Seems hit or miss.

Use a proper XMPP service (2)

ickleberry (864871) | about 2 years ago | (#40778519)

Or run your own prosody server, not the slightest bit hard to set up or maintain. To hell with this Google cloud based nonsense

Re:Use a proper XMPP service (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778965)

+1 fo shizzle

Re:Use a proper XMPP service (2)

thesandbender (911391) | about 2 years ago | (#40780417)

Your servers have never gone down? Amazing, how much to get you to admin my systems?

Re:Use a proper XMPP service (1)

ickleberry (864871) | about 2 years ago | (#40788763)

It will go down when someone in the collitch discovers i'm running it off their servers

really? What are you expecting? (2)

JustNiz (692889) | about 2 years ago | (#40778531)

Its a great service and costs precisely $0. I'm VERY happy with it.

No service I know of, including all the ones I've payed A LOT for, has a perfect record of 0 outages ever.

It's just Grand Central (-1, Offtopic)

Animats (122034) | about 2 years ago | (#40778553)

"Google Voice" is just a rebranded Grand Central. Google hasn't done much with it since they bought it. Users have been screaming about the same bugs on the forums for years. The SMS side of Google Voice has been especially flaky. Google Voice gets their phone numbers from some low-end third party telco in Northern California that doesn't seem to be properly plugged in to the system that tells other telcos about the numbers and their properties (cell/landline, etc.).

Google Voice doesn't have an API. There's hack code to talk to Google Voice from programs. It doesn't work too well, because the interface to Voice is (perhaps by intent) API-hostile. If you're using Google Voice for anything serious, get a pay service like Twilio. You pay a few cents per message, but it actually works and there's customer support.

Re:It's just Grand Central (2)

Anonymous Psychopath (18031) | about 2 years ago | (#40778605)

"Google Voice" is just a rebranded Grand Central. Google hasn't done much with it since they bought it. Users have been screaming about the same bugs on the forums for years. The SMS side of Google Voice has been especially flaky. Google Voice gets their phone numbers from some low-end third party telco in Northern California that doesn't seem to be properly plugged in to the system that tells other telcos about the numbers and their properties (cell/landline, etc.).

Google Voice doesn't have an API. There's hack code to talk to Google Voice from programs. It doesn't work too well, because the interface to Voice is (perhaps by intent) API-hostile. If you're using Google Voice for anything serious, get a pay service like Twilio. You pay a few cents per message, but it actually works and there's customer support.

I believe you're mistaking Google Talk for Google Voice.

Meanwhile (5, Funny)

vsigma (154562) | about 2 years ago | (#40778643)

productivity shot wayyyy up!

"Cloud Service" (5, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778665)

users of the downed cloud service

cloud service

Okaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyy, Slashdot (and I'm looking at you, alphadogg). Since when did chat services become "Cloud Services"?

Is IRC a "CLOUD Service"? Is AOL Instant Messenger a "Cloud Service"? Are MSN Messenger and Yahoo Messenger "Cloud Services"?

XMPP is a "Cloud" protocol? Yes? Yes?

Re:"Cloud Service" (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778791)

Unless you host it yourself, it is and always has been a "cloud service".

Re:"Cloud Service" (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778905)

Unless you host it yourself, it is and always has been a "cloud service".

No. Wrong. It hasn't. It was just a plain ol' goddamned SERVICE before a few assholes with their head in the fucking clouds figured everyone loved the word "cloud" and turned it into a fucking buzzword that covered everything that big bad scary internet did.

Re:"Cloud Service" (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40779387)

O RLY.

So, someone ELSE's remote servers are "clouds", but MY servers aren't "clouds"? How do you know. Have you ever stood in my machine room? Have you looked at my config files?

How does anyone honestly "know" for sure that a remote IP address is or isn't an edge router for a "cloud". It's irrelevant to end-users. Google Talk is a Chat service.

Re:"Cloud Service" (1)

danomac (1032160) | about 2 years ago | (#40780189)

A cloud in a topology is a networked group of computers. The internet was always referred to as a cloud in diagrams for this reason.

If you have more than one device at home, you have a private cloud (as viewed from the internet looking in.) The buzzword as used now is basically used to indicate running software on someone else's networked group of computers.

Re:"Cloud Service" (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778881)

Routing is clearly the oldest cloud service. :-)

Re:"Cloud Service" (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40779441)

As soon as some asshat decided to coin the term to describe anything (and everything) that takes place on what used to be called the internet, that's when.

It's a service. It takes place in "the cloud" (yes, I hold disdain for the term as well). Therefore it is a "could service" you knuckle-fuck.

Where to post when twitter goes down...? (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778857)

well slashdot of course.

sp0ngE (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40778859)

Routing problem? (1)

JDG1980 (2438906) | about 2 years ago | (#40778873)

If both Twitter and Google Voice are down, could this be an indication of some kind of backbone routing issue? Are any other sites affected?

Re:Routing problem? (1)

Macrat (638047) | about 2 years ago | (#40782585)

Google Voice didn't go down. Did you even read the article?

The Cloud (0)

Nethemas the Great (909900) | about 2 years ago | (#40778879)

But nothing bad can happen in The Cloud ? How did this happen? The sales person told me that if I move all of my critical infrastructure into the cloud it would be safe with six-nines reliability because it's distributed. It's not all my eggs in one basket anymore. One node goes does another takes its place. It's the almighty cloud...

It's coming! (5, Funny)

clinko (232501) | about 2 years ago | (#40779105)

"Dad, you were yelling numbers in your sleep again!"

"Son, let me tell you of the Rant snowball of 2012. It started with google talk. The complaining spilled over to twitter. After twitter went down, we all knew it was coming. Facebook, blogs, it kept going downhill. People logged into services they forgot existed to complain, MSN, YAHOO messenger! It was madness.

I only survived by ranting to a spam bot on ICQ, a time before names, '458253 can you hear me! 458253 It's all down! 458253 I highly doubt you're a Nigerian prince!!!!'"

you guys still use those old things? (1)

TheGratefulNet (143330) | about 2 years ago | (#40779247)

have you not heard of Google Smirk and the competing service, Grinner?

(oops, let the cat out of the bag, dident I?)

Support (0)

ryanmika (2664799) | about 2 years ago | (#40779283)

tanks for share this post.
http://palukursusdisain.blogspot.com/2012/05/988bet-agen-bola-untuk-prediksi-piala.html

Re:Support (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40779971)

Anyone brave enough to determine what manner of evil this link is?

Re:Support (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40781559)

It's just non-english spam. The most interesting part is the old school counter at the bottom of the page.

Re:Support (1)

ryanmika (2664799) | about 2 years ago | (#40837935)

sorry, I was wrong. I'm follow the seo contest.

No $ (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40779583)

my co-worker's sister brought home $16016 past week. she is making income on the computer and bought a $546800 home. All she did was get lucky and work up the guide reported on this web page http://snurl.com/24g56wd

SCRAMBLE, SCRAMBLE, all hands on deck! (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40780127)

RIMMER runs out of the room. Close up of LISTER's face... with no sign of life. RIMMER walks back in.
RIMMER: Er, perhaps you didn't catch that. I said SCRAMBLE!
LISTER: (Still half asleep) Yeah, that'll be great with bacon and beans, man. (Lays his head back onto pillow.)
RIMMER: Look, Starbug is a blazing inferno, the engine room is waist deep in rocket fuel and we're being attacked off the starboard bow by an unidentified craft!
CAT: (Appearing from under the covers on the other bunk.) Really?!
RIMMER: No, of course not really. It's a drill. We're pretending that Starbug is on fire and under attack.
LISTER: And I'm pretending to scramble, man. (Moves his hands up and down in scrambling motion whilst still on the bunk.)
RIMMER: Look, you've got 30 seconds to get out of bed or I'm declaring you officially dead.
RIMMER leaves the room.
LISTER: Good, then we can rest in peace.

This is the actual cause (3, Funny)

slashmydots (2189826) | about 2 years ago | (#40780343)

I'm 6 seasons and 2 episodes into the X-files at a rate of about 3 episodes per day on Netflix AND I arrived at work today to find 1 motherboard and 2 power supplies in 3 manager or department heads' PCs were fried due to a power outage AND Twitter and Google Talk are down. So obviously, combining all those pieces of evidence, there's an electricity monster loose in the US power grid.

WTF? (2)

slashmydots (2189826) | about 2 years ago | (#40780407)

If you look at the Twitter status page, it says Twitter Site Issue - 2 hours ago with a short description. Then under that, there's a button to tweet that message. How? lol. But wait, 3,704 people somehow retweeted it according to the counter....WTF?!?!?!?! There are 3,704 magical Twitter wizards, hackers, or people plugged into The Matrix at the moment apparently. Now they just need to find out which one of them used their dark magic to crash Twitter lol.

still greater than 99% up at this moment (1)

rzitex (2206668) | about 2 years ago | (#40780787)

So if anyone using the service actually cared to look at the SLA, they would see what Google actually promises. http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/terms/sla.html [google.com] still over 99% at this moment. so paying customers only get 3 free days of service. everyone that is complaining on twitter probably doesn't pay, so they don't get anything anyways.

Internet down, not Google (3, Informative)

cstacy (534252) | about 2 years ago | (#40783057)

It's not just Google Talk. This morning around 4 AM I could not reach most of the west coast reliably. I could get to Google (search) mostly, but all kinds of sites and services I wanted were unavailable. The traceoute from Washington D.C. stopped about 12 miles to the west at an above.net router.

Sorry I'm a bit late on this, but... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40783239)

I tested multiple users from multiple servers across the country (America) and each user had different results (could, or couldn't log in). Strange how it all works in a weaving pattern like that. Imagine trying to connect all of that shit back together in real time. Nice job for google's IT dept, yo. No google fuck you, I'm talking about your bad-ass IT dept, thanks.

This from another post:
At 4:10 pm Google posted on its App Status page for GTalk: "We're investigating reports of an issue with Google Talk. We will provide more information shortly."
Another update 10 minutes later said, "We're aware of a problem with Google Talk affecting a majority of users. The affected users are able to access Google Talk, but are seeing error messages and/or other unexpected behaviour. We will provide an update by 7/26/12 5:20 pm detailing when we expect to resolve the problem. Please note that this resolution time is an estimate and may change."
And one more update 5:20 pm went like this – “Google is still working to resolve the issue.” We are continuing to investigate this issue. We will provide an update by 7/26/12 6:20 pm detailing when we expect to resolve the problem," said a post on the Google Talk App Status page.
Then an update 6:20 pm said - "Our team is continuing to investigate this issue. We will provide an update by 7/26/12 7:20 pm with more information about this problem. Thank you for your patience."

Isn't it funny how dependant we have become on these free social networks?

MSN was down as well. (2)

Kaenneth (82978) | about 2 years ago | (#40783899)

MSN had an outage message this morning.

I am possibly the only /. user to notice this.

Never Used It (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40786509)

XD

LoL

My fault (2)

LittleBigScript (618162) | about 2 years ago | (#40786581)

I typed Google in to Google.

Sorry for breaking the internet.

Too much stuff through the intertubes. (1)

Erikderzweite (1146485) | about 2 years ago | (#40788085)

The tubes are clogged. We put too much stuff through them!

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...