Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog Hits Primetime

Unknown Lamer posted about 2 years ago | from the that's-what-you-get-for-having-bad-taste dept.

Entertainment 95

First time accepted submitter Goat_Cheese_Pizza writes "Word on the Intertubes (I picked the Washington Post) is Joss Whedon's musical masterpiece, Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog, will air on CW's primetime lineup on October 9th. I've always wanted to watch Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog with commercials! Thanks, CW!"

cancel ×

95 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Mwahahahahahahahahahahaha! Ahaaahaaa! (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40826579)

Mwahahahahahahahahahahaha! Ahaaahaaa!

Re:Mwahahahahahahahahahahaha! Ahaaahaaa! (4, Funny)

aztec1430 (242755) | about 2 years ago | (#40826583)

standards...

SEQUEL PLEASE (1)

TheSpoom (715771) | about 2 years ago | (#40829425)

So, serious question: Is this a stunt? Is there going to be a sequel? Please let this be an excuse to announce a sequel.

Last I heard [wired.com] they were pretty far into it; could they have already filmed it? Does anyone know if it would have fit into the major players' schedules since March?

Re:SEQUEL PLEASE (1)

Gilmoure (18428) | about 2 years ago | (#40829543)

I asked John Scalzi if he was going to be part of DH2; nope.

Bummer.

Dr. Wonderful (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40826585)

He's Dr. Horrible's worst enemy.

Hehehe... I made a funny. Score: 5, Funny.

Re:Dr. Wonderful (1)

zephvark (1812804) | about 2 years ago | (#40836351)

That's MISTER Wonderful, thank you. I didn't not spend six years in evil medical school to be called DOCTOR.

Yay, but ... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40826619)

the CW? Really?

Re:Yay, but ... (3, Funny)

OzPeter (195038) | about 2 years ago | (#40826999)

the CW? Really?

Well given that the current line up on any channel seems to be based on randomly drawing names out of a hat (wrestling on syfi, "paranormal" BS on history etc) I'd say that CW is an appropriate location for a Joss Whedon production.

Re:Yay, but ... (4, Informative)

Transkaren (1925482) | about 2 years ago | (#40828889)

The CW actually has a lot of decent scifi/fantasy shows. True, they're more aimed at a teen audience, but Supernatural's probably one of the best shows on television period, Smallville was a pretty decent take on Superman (Michael Rosenbaum is an incredible Lex Luthor in that show!), Nikita's a pretty decent spy/action show, and they usually add at least one scifi/fantasy show a year (I think they're showing "Arrow" this year - a show about the Green Arrow.)

That said, Comedy Central would be slightly more appropriate for the Sing-Along Blog.

Re:Yay, but ... (1)

Darinbob (1142669) | about 2 years ago | (#40832797)

What the heck is CW?

Re:Yay, but ... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40827995)

Isn't it the channel that was showing Buffy and Angel for a long time?

Uhh, Yay? (1)

rsmith-mac (639075) | about 2 years ago | (#40826635)

I'm not quite sure how to respond to this. This is good for Joss Whedon, I guess?

It just seems odd to air a 4 year old one-off production like this. Especially since the CW's primary demographics are essentially the under-18 female crowd. I don't see how the CW is a good fit for Dr. Horrible, especially since they're having to edit it.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (2)

The Rizz (1319) | about 2 years ago | (#40826749)

It just seems odd to air a 4 year old one-off production like this

... except that it's been hinted at for a long time that a sequel is in the works. Perhaps it's going prime time because the CW (or their parent company) is planning to give the Whedons the funding for a movie / TV series.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (2)

will_die (586523) | about 2 years ago | (#40827003)

article I saw on it mentioned that this gave CW the rights to the first try to get the sequel.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (1)

gnick (1211984) | about 2 years ago | (#40828611)

Dunno about CW, but Joss did say at a ComiCon interview that his next project was going to be a Dr Horrible 2. Can't picture how that's going to work, but I've got faith in the guy.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (1)

happy_place (632005) | about 2 years ago | (#40827011)

knowing the fine quality programming on the CW, chances are, if it has even a particle of popularity, it'll be the next big series and run for 7 or 8 seasons... :) And they'll bring back Felicia Day's character and then kill her over and over...

Re:Uhh, Yay? (4, Funny)

JackieBrown (987087) | about 2 years ago | (#40827141)

And they'll bring back Felicia Day's character and then kill her over and over...

That was Eureka

Re:Uhh, Yay? (2)

mianne (965568) | about 2 years ago | (#40830447)

I thought that was South Park.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40827443)

Oh great...now I don't have to watch it on the CW...she dies?

Re:Uhh, Yay? (2)

Abreu (173023) | about 2 years ago | (#40828325)

There is a statute of limitations for spoiler alerts, you know?

http://www.dorktower.com/2012/05/23/puny-spoiler-dork-tower-23-05-12/ [dorktower.com]

Re:Uhh, Yay? (1)

Boronx (228853) | about 2 years ago | (#40829225)

There's no statute of limitations on spoilers for cult movies.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (1)

Gilmoure (18428) | about 2 years ago | (#40829581)

Don't let folks know that Eddie doesn't make it in Rocky Horror?

Re:Uhh, Yay? (1)

Boronx (228853) | about 2 years ago | (#40830501)

Exactly. I didn't know that.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (5, Insightful)

Rei (128717) | about 2 years ago | (#40826787)

What makes you think that Dr. Horrible would be a bad fit with the under-18 female crowd? Since when are romantic musicals starring guys like Nathan Fillion and Neil Patrick Harris not a good fit for under-18 female viewers? Anyway, CW's prime demographic is ostensibly 18-34-old women.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (1)

somersault (912633) | about 2 years ago | (#40827271)

Having just watched Act 1, I agree wholeheartedly.. it looks like basically a quirky romantic comedy.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40828289)

<spoiler>
Until act III where it becomes a romantic tragedy.
</spoiler>

Re:Uhh, Yay? (1)

AwesomeMcgee (2437070) | about 2 years ago | (#40828395)

I thought that's where it became a triumphant victory..

Re:Uhh, Yay? (2)

Culture20 (968837) | about 2 years ago | (#40828839)

Unless you watched the last two seconds. Sometimes there's a third, even deeper, level and that one is the same as the top surface. It's Billy's sing along blog. Dr. Horrible was just a means to an unrealized end.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (1)

Namarrgon (105036) | about 2 years ago | (#40833467)

Sometimes there's a third, even deeper, level and that one is the same as the top surface.

Like a pie!

Re:Uhh, Yay? (1)

guises (2423402) | about 2 years ago | (#40828817)

Your post, GP, original submitter, original article in the Washington Post... every one of you using this CW acronym like it means something, not one of you defining what it is. I guess I'll have to look it up for myself. Shame on you for making me do work.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (1)

SpryGuy (206254) | about 2 years ago | (#40829089)

It's an American Broadcast Television Network... like ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, FOX... CW is the newest of them I believe, but it's been around a while. It's the network that Buffy moved to for the final two seasons. It features shows like "Smallville", "Vampire Diaries", and a bunch of other teen shows that I don't really watch.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (2)

guises (2423402) | about 2 years ago | (#40829717)

Thanks. According to Wikipedia, CW stands for CBS Warner Brothers and it's the successor to "The WB" and the United Paramount Network, both of which I was familiar with, but not the new thing. Maybe I'm just getting old.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (1)

Gilmoure (18428) | about 2 years ago | (#40829563)

My daughter is 11 and she thinks Doctor Horrible is great.

Re:Uhh, Yay? (1)

residieu (577863) | about 2 years ago | (#40833739)

Especially since the CW's primary demographics are essentially the under-18 female crowd.

But NPH is so hot. Too bad he's taken.

Edited down? (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40826637)

The episodes will have any sections of exposition cut from them. ... and be shown in the wrong order.

Re:Edited down? (5, Funny)

egamma (572162) | about 2 years ago | (#40827755)

The episodes will have any sections of exposition cut from them. ... and be shown in the wrong order.

No, that's on Fox.

A letter of condemnation... (5, Funny)

History's Coming To (1059484) | about 2 years ago | (#40826641)

Any dolt with half a brain,
Can see that human kind has gone insane,
To the point where something free
Which is loved by you and me
Is filled with adverts most inane.
Listen close to Joss's bank account,
Hear that tinkling sound,
Cash and cheques are falling all about,
Whedon's profit bound!

(Seriously, they all deserve a little pay-back for what was a free project to start with, fair enough!)

Re:A letter of condemnation... (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40826763)

haha lmao it's not coming to

You can just turn to dust and die now! Farts are being expelled out of my asshole this minute!

Such a thing!

Re:A letter of condemnation... (2)

History's Coming To (1059484) | about 2 years ago | (#40827553)

Your joke is bound to bomb, Your trolling is oh so wrong, Don't you see? The meaning of irony.... mycleanpc.cooooooooooommm......

Re:A letter of condemnation... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40827501)

And now the music is back in my head.
I hate you.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

History's Coming To (1059484) | about 2 years ago | (#40829691)

There's a cure for that...

"I try to discover
A little something to make me sweeter,
Oh baby refrain...."

Sorry, couldn't be avoided.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (0, Flamebait)

PopeRatzo (965947) | about 2 years ago | (#40827661)

(Seriously, they all deserve a little pay-back for what was a free project to start with, fair enough!)

Why? Do you believe every successful artist needs to be paid for every project they attempt? Is there some natural law somewhere that anytime a well-paid artist doodles on a pad he is entitled (or as you say, "deserves") to have checks start rolling in?

I don't know what the Horrible Singing Blog is, and it may indeed turn out to be one of the canonical and transcendental works art in Western Civilization, but statistically 100% of artists (+ or - .1%) do their work for free every day. This Josh Whedon needs to be the exception? Really?

Even successful artists once and a while just do their work and give it away, as an indication of their humanity and to prove that they are not just hacks looking to squeeze every nickel out of the teenagers who consume their...product.

Or maybe he didn't get paid enough for The Avengers and needs to sell off some of his old projects in order to make the money he owes to that brothel in Thailand.

Or maybe somebody saw an early edit of Much Ado about Nothing and realized that if his big-budget "retelling" of the great Shakespeare play doesn't do big business with little girls and Apple users he may have to go back to being a clown at kids' birthday parties and he's trying to monetize anything he ever put on film before anyone notices.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40827713)

I hope that dumping your anger here makes you more pleasant to those around you in real life.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

Gilmoure (18428) | about 2 years ago | (#40829611)

*golf clap*

Re:A letter of condemnation... (5, Insightful)

History's Coming To (1059484) | about 2 years ago | (#40827765)

No, my point was this:

The project was done during the downtime caused by the writers strike. All of the money came from Whedon and the goodwill of the various people who got involved, it was all done for fun and was released, entirely for free and without adverts. It's a superb example of something being made for free, given away, and then becoming profitable later because of its sheer popularity. It's precisely the same as a bedroom musician, entertaining blogger or a stick-figure webcomic becoming popular and suddenly pulling in some money for the artist/s.

Yes, I'd imagine that Whedon is reasonably wealthy already, but that doesn't change my enjoyment at seeing a free product earning some money a few years down the line. It's nice to see the "watch the adverts and maybe we'll include something you like" model being flipped on its head.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

PopeRatzo (965947) | about 2 years ago | (#40832795)

It's a superb example of something being made for free, given away, and then becoming profitable later because of its sheer popularity.

So that sort of conflicts with the notion of it being done, "for fun".

And, "given away free". Usually when something is given away, it is not charged for later. If I make a nice bookshelf "for fun" and "give it away free" to my aunt, it's not really great form to call her up later and tell her she owes me $10,000.

And I certainly cannot later say I "deserve" that $10,000.

My objection was to the use of the word "deserve".

Re:A letter of condemnation... (3, Insightful)

History's Coming To (1059484) | about 2 years ago | (#40833307)

If she wants to give you $10k then that's fine. And if you've made bookcase that someone loves enough to give you $10k, then yes, you deserve it. Well done, I hope it makes you a little happier.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (3, Insightful)

anyGould (1295481) | about 2 years ago | (#40832885)

It's worth noting that by all rumors, Whedon (and the cast) came out quite nicely already from Dr. Horrible. Remember that it was only available online for free for a short time. Then it was sold on iTunes, then it was sold on DVD (with all sorts of quite-awesome extras). Joss made his investment back on that job.

So getting it on CW is just extra icing on the cake - especially if it's part of a larger setup for DH2 or whatever Joss' next project will be.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

VGPowerlord (621254) | about 2 years ago | (#40827909)

I don't know what the Horrible Singing Blog is, and it may indeed turn out to be one of the canonical and transcendental works art in Western Civilization, but statistically 100% of artists (+ or - .1%) do their work for free every day. This Josh Whedon needs to be the exception? Really?

I assume the phrasing "they all deserve a little pay-back [sic]*" is referring to it being a good show. And it is a good show, and some of us would like to see more like it.

Disclaimer: I purchased both the DVD and music CD.

* pay-back has a negative connotation and should be phrased differently.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

History's Coming To (1059484) | about 2 years ago | (#40830091)

Yup, I meant "they all deserve a little money for their efforts", you're right, clumsy use of "pay-back".

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

Sulphur (1548251) | about 2 years ago | (#40832503)

Yup, I meant "they all deserve a little money for their efforts", you're right, clumsy use of "pay-back".

Pay-back is Hell.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

PopeRatzo (965947) | about 2 years ago | (#40832887)

Yup, I meant "they all deserve a little money for their efforts"

OK, this is the part I object to. "Deserve".

They did the project "for free" and "for fun" but now they "deserve" a "little money".

Deserving money for something you made for fun and gave away free seems to be a strange view of the entitlements of success.

And if you were a really big fan of Whedon, is him getting money for something he did years ago and gave away free the most effective way to encourage future good work?

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

BriggsBU (1138021) | about 2 years ago | (#40828267)

You compare an idle doodle to a full production. This is not an accurate comparison. A more apt comparison would be to compare an idle doodle with a rough draft of a script that never makes it to production.

Doctor Horrible's Sing-Along Blog has been well received and in my humble opinion I see nothing wrong with them cashing in on it a bit.

If an artist makes something and no one enjoys it, they get no pay. But when they make something that people enjoy then they do typically receive monetary compensation for said item. The same is true of this production. People do enjoy it, so they do deserve to make some money on it.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

PopeRatzo (965947) | about 2 years ago | (#40832727)

Doctor Horrible's Sing-Along Blog has been well received and in my humble opinion I see nothing wrong with them cashing in on it a bit.

Nor do I. My objection was to the word "deserve".

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

residieu (577863) | about 2 years ago | (#40833831)

And money aside. I want more people to be exposed to Dr. Horrible. It's an excellent show. Sure, it's better without commercial interruption (though you can probably just put the commercials between the episodes, less interruption that way...). But everyone who's going to track it down via internet/DVD has probably already seen it. So this will put it in front of some more people who won't see it otherwise.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

PopeRatzo (965947) | about 2 years ago | (#40833979)

I want more people to be exposed to Dr. Horrible.

If as you say it was "made for fun" and then "given away for free" then that should be no problem.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

residieu (577863) | about 2 years ago | (#40834383)

I wasn't involved in the production, so I don't know what their motivation was. I doubt "fun" was their only motivation. I'm pretty sure the initial free giveaway was always planned as a short-term thing to drum up interest for when they can start selling it.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (4, Insightful)

VGPowerlord (621254) | about 2 years ago | (#40827849)

I hate to say it... the lyric timing is wrong in one section.

"is filled with adverts most inane" vs. "if I throw poison in the water main"

"is filled with" matches to "if I throw" and "most inane" matches to "the water main"

Which means that "adverts" (2 syllables) has to match "poison in the" (4 syllables).

TL;DR "adverts" needs to be "advertisements" to match the cadence of the original lyrics.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (1)

Darinbob (1142669) | about 2 years ago | (#40832833)

Lighten up Frances.

Re:A letter of condemnation... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40838651)

Lighten up Frances.

nice Stripes reference!! :)

lol (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40826791)

CW

hahaha

Nuff said.

Enlighten a poor non-USian... (1)

dutchd00d (823703) | about 2 years ago | (#40826863)

... what is CW?

Re:Enlighten a poor non-USian... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40826939)

Whats left of the WB

Re:Enlighten a poor non-USian... (1)

VGPowerlord (621254) | about 2 years ago | (#40827953)

Whats left of the WB

and UPN.

Joss Whedon (0, Troll)

Anne_Nonymous (313852) | about 2 years ago | (#40826947)

Joss Whedon - He was the actor that played that kid from the new Star Wars, right?

Re:Joss Whedon (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40827275)

Joss Whedon - He was the actor that played that kid from the new Star Wars, right?

Yes.

Coincidentally, his twin sister, Will, played Buffy in that Twilight movie.

Re:Joss Whedon (1)

Lurker2288 (995635) | about 2 years ago | (#40828155)

Will Whedon--didn't he play Wesley Crusher?

Re:Joss Whedon (1)

SpryGuy (206254) | about 2 years ago | (#40829107)

You have absolutely no proof of that.

Re:Joss Whedon (1)

aztrailerpunk (1971174) | about 2 years ago | (#40827427)

I know your just trying to be funny but your comment makes nerd rage with power of a 1000 suns.

Re:Joss Whedon (1)

aztrailerpunk (1971174) | about 2 years ago | (#40827463)

and with that I i will get raged against for mistyping your instead of you're. I apologize now nerd gods.

Re:Joss Whedon (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40828277)

'power of 1000 suns'
or
'power of a thousand suns' :)

captcha: asocial .....HA.

Re:Joss Whedon (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40827679)

I know your just trying to be funny but your comment makes nerd rage with power of a 1000 suns.

Really? I didn't know that. Where did you and my just trying to be funny meet?

Well if you did it correctly (2)

Greyfox (87712) | about 2 years ago | (#40827123)

And had all the commercials themed with the show, it would probably be even more awesome. Hell I might even just sit down and watch the whole thing through.

Re:Well if you did it correctly (1)

mianne (965568) | about 2 years ago | (#40830785)

Hmm, trying to come up with a list of appropriate sponsors:

Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog presented by TCBY..

Stanley: For all your tool needs, including hammers.
Lotion and/or wet wipes commercials.
JCPenney announcing a new line of sweater vests.
PSA for the Second Harvest Food Bank or your local homeless shelter.
Does any toy company make an R/C van?

Re:Well if you did it correctly (1)

T.E.D. (34228) | about 2 years ago | (#40834299)

Given the large amount of the "action" that happens in a laundromat, I'm thinking laundry cleaning products would be good. They might even photoshop a product placement in there...

I'm not impressed (5, Funny)

rjejr (921275) | about 2 years ago | (#40827353)

So the CW is willing to show a 1 night presentation of a movie starring the stars of "How I Met Your Mother" and "Castle" produced and directed by the guy who directed the mega-blockbuster "Avengers" movie on some random Tuesday nigth in Oct? Which is during the baseball playoffs. Wow, really going out on a limb there.

Re:I'm not impressed (1)

erko (806441) | about 2 years ago | (#40838517)

Doogie Howser! None of those TV shows were as big Doogie Howser!!

Really - I looked it up.

And the data was confusing, but the show wasn't bad - it even had a computer in it.

in case youre curious (-1, Flamebait)

slashmydots (2189826) | about 2 years ago | (#40827515)

I'm a pretty average person. I watched it on Netflix. I hated it. So in case all these positive comments and the ratings on IMDB make you think it's good, it's not. It's unbearable.

Re:in case youre curious (3, Interesting)

History's Coming To (1059484) | about 2 years ago | (#40827607)

It's a romantic evil comedy geek musical, hey, it's not for everyone. Personally, I love it, mostly because of the "hey, there's a writers strike, want to do something just for fun?" element.

Re:in case youre curious (1)

jvin248 (1147821) | about 2 years ago | (#40827947)

THAT'S the reason it was great. "I'll show you striking writers" and they did a free internet distributed independent show. The second part of distributing it without a network and just over the internet - you had to get one of those new fangled internet-cable-things and a 'puter to see it.

Re:in case youre curious (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40827697)

in case you are curious, slashmydots opinion is pretty unique in that it is not representative.

Re:in case youre curious (1)

x6060 (672364) | about 2 years ago | (#40827863)

All I read in that post was "I hate fun, and no one else should ever have fun because I don't like it."

Re:in case youre curious (1)

nedlohs (1335013) | about 2 years ago | (#40828115)

And lots of pretty average people hated things that you liked. Which also isn't exactly earth shattering news.

If you like that style of thing it's great, if you don't the unsurprisingly you won't like it.

Re:in case youre curious (1)

Hatta (162192) | about 2 years ago | (#40828513)

Of course it is. Joss Whedon is terrible.

Re:in case youre curious (1)

SpryGuy (206254) | about 2 years ago | (#40829123)

It's pretty awesome. I have no idea what you're even talking about. It's brilliant. Hilarious. Touching. Entertaining.

Re:in case youre curious (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40830649)

I think what you meant to say was:

"I'm a moron who doesn't understand that different people have different tastes, and one average person may love something that another average person hates"

Can they say "Penis" on prime time tv? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40828373)

The hammer. You know the rest.

Good for the Interwebs. Maybe. (1)

metrometro (1092237) | about 2 years ago | (#40828403)

I don't watch CW and won't watch because Internet culture is on it. But it's probably a good thing, in the short term, for a quirky Web-only product (albeit with major names doing it) to become a feeder for big money entertainment. I think.

What TV should learn:
  -- we should let creative people do things creatively without focus groups and demographic analysis

What TV will learn.
  -- More goggles! We need more goggles!

A letter from the Evil League of Evil... (3, Funny)

Picass0 (147474) | about 2 years ago | (#40829121)

Bad Horse! Bad Horse!
Bad Horse! Bad Horse!

We saw the prime-time showing
Five minutes after eight
Our Tivo missed the ending since you started late!
It make me kick a fencepost,
and filled my heart with hate!
We have pics of Gossip Girl and we'll be in touch.

you suck,
Bad Horse!

Re:A letter from the Evil League of Evil... (1)

BanHammor (2587175) | about 2 years ago | (#40831341)

How are you supposed to sing the "We have pics of Gossip Girl and we'll be in touch/you suck,/Bad Horse!"? To say that it doesn't match the rhythm is to say it very, very lightly.

Whedon's Free Ride (1)

Gilmoure (18428) | about 2 years ago | (#40829689)

So, with Avengers success, JW now has some freedom to make whatever he wants.After seeing DH musical, I wonder if there's a chance he'll do Bored of the Ring: The Musical?

Hopefully (1)

hackertourist (2202674) | about 2 years ago | (#40831233)

CW won't fuck up the aspect ratio, unlike the Youtube video linked in TFA.

WTF (1)

Mister Liberty (769145) | about 2 years ago | (#40831841)

is this all about...
eh - who cares.

Re:WTF (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40838071)

You cared enough to comment...

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>