Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

A Conversation with Rob Malda - Part One of Three (Video)

Roblimo posted about 2 years ago | from the it-all-started-with-a-bored-college-student dept.

The Media 72

Slashdot's Glorious 15th Anniversary (link to bad fireworks video) is coming up in October, so Jeff 'Soulskill' Boehm and Rob 'samzenpus' Rozeboom decided to have a chat with Rob Malda. Back in 1997 Rob founded a website named Chips & Dips that later morphed into something called Slashdot, which has been (as the saying goes) "often imitated but never duplicated." Since leaving Slashdot, Rob has been doing this, that, and the other, but we'll let him tell you what he's doing in his own words. Note: This is an audio interview with some semi-interesting photos laid over it as a slide show, so you might want to listen to it rather than watch it. Parts Two and Three of the interview will be along in the next few days.

cancel ×

72 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Questions to Rob Malda (anyone can answer) (1)

drinkydoh (2658743) | about 2 years ago | (#40919847)

Why you proposed your wife via Slashdot?

Read all about how governments use brain pattern matching abusively [blogspot.com] .

Re:Questions to Rob Malda (anyone can answer) (1)

Halo1 (136547) | about 2 years ago | (#40920179)

Why you proposed your wife via Slashdot?

Read all about how governments use brain pattern matching abusively [blogspot.com] .

Just ask the government.

Re:Questions to Rob Malda (anyone can answer) (3, Informative)

dkleinsc (563838) | about 2 years ago | (#40920541)

Because it was Valentine's Day, he wanted to do something both geeky and romantic, he knew Kathleen would see it, and she said "yes".

Re:Questions to Rob Malda (anyone can answer) (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40922331)

Why?

Re:Questions to Rob Malda (anyone can answer) (1)

Meski (774546) | about 2 years ago | (#40939813)

Just as well she didn't have mod points.

Chips and Dips (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40919891)

Good to see Soulkill and Samzpenis still keeping the Dips part alive.

Do you support the constitution (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40919925)

Or are you going to vote for Obama?

Re:Do you support the constitution (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40921695)

Or are you going to vote for Obama?

Do you support the constitution or are you going to vote for either party?

Re:Do you support the constitution (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40925811)

Attention leftist free software hippies!

You live in a dream world, I'm afraid, and 20 cents is just the beginning. You don't think Papa John's is going to buy them health insurance do you? He's going to pay the much cheaper Fine/Tax. And his employee's still won't benefit one single iota.

In fact, Obama's 6000 new IRS agents will find these employees and take away their income tax refundable credits because they still won't be able to afford the insurance that is now MANDATORY. If they couldn't afford it before, they won't just suddenly find the money to buy your beloved Obama's individual policies.

Please try thinking now and then beyond your love for Obama.

Have you ever noticed the average age of a chain pizza store employee? 18, 23 maybe? These are the young people that Obama is now going to penalize - TAX - for not buying the MANDATORY Obamacare package. They are young and healthy and the only reason Obama and the Spread the Wealth crowd demand their participation is that they will now be paying for insurance that they didn't need before and will not use now.

It is this very group you see in your "dreams of my father" fantasy world that Obama is going to take money from that they didn't have to pay before. AND THEY STILL WON'T HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE. They'll just have to pay their own fine at tax time.

For goodness sake, take a step ouside the box!

You should stop checking your brain at the alter of the first "not completely White" President. Obama is a disaster.

Re:Do you support the constitution (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40928895)

Obama is doing fine, disaster presidents were Nixon and George Bush (both of them). Haters gonna hate no matter who's in charge, but I'm sure you could do better job. Just run for president come next round. It's a democracy, after all.

Re:Do you support the constitution (1)

denvergeek (1184943) | about 2 years ago | (#40933933)

Although Nixon gave us the EPA and the Clean Water Act...

Sorry, Did Not Listen (5, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40919933)

Why post an audio interview without a transcript? Way to know your audience.

Re:Sorry, Did Not Listen (1)

avandesande (143899) | about 2 years ago | (#40920837)

RTFA == WTFV

Mod parent down! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40921767)

Program much?

The == operator is used for logical evaluation and is not used for assignment or declaration. So, by saying RTFA == WTFV , you're basically asking us to evaluate whether RTFA is equal to WTFV. I'll return zero for that.
 
This is one of my pet peeves around here. The thoughtless use of the == operator and the annoying @$())(JASDNO CARRIER fad.

Re:Mod parent down! (1)

avandesande (143899) | about 2 years ago | (#40921931)

Get out much?

Re:Mod parent down! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40922325)

Yeah. As a matter of fact, I have just returned from an evening at the clubs. After the clubs, I spent a half-hour with a woman whom I picked up, and I have now returned to my flat to check email and relax.

Now for dessert, please munch on my nuts.

Re:Mod parent down! (1)

avandesande (143899) | about 2 years ago | (#40922785)

Wet?

Re:Mod parent down! (1)

Chelloveck (14643) | about 2 years ago | (#40922763)

No, the use of == is correct here. He's certainly not assigning the value of WTFV to RTFA. He's stating the equivalence of RTFA and WTFV. Since the article is in video form, the only way to read the article is to watch the video. If you've watched the video, you've read the article. If you haven't watched, you haven't read. They can both be true, or they can both be false. Either way, (RTFA == WTFV) evaluates to true.

It would be better to write RTFA â WTFV, of course, but slashdot doesn't believe in unicode and mangles the three-bar STRICTLY EQUIVALENT TO glyph I put between RTFA and WTFV.

IDIOT. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40923237)

The GP already made it CLEAR that the == operator is not a statement of equivalence. Go back to grammar school, you dolt.

Re:IDIOT. (1)

dotbot (2030980) | about 2 years ago | (#40934121)

The GP already made it CLEAR that the == operator is not a statement of equivalence.

The particular choice of operator for equality in a predicate cannot influence whether the predicate is being logically asserted, i.e. holds for all valuations, or is just a free-standing formula. To make it clear that it was an assertion, it should have been written with a turnstile in front:

|- RTFA == WTFV

Re:IDIOT. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40951809)

You slashdotters are stupid. ITT Tech first-years, all of you. Double equal signs are NEVER used free-standing.

Re:Mod parent down! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40933795)

Actually, dude, that was the joke where you're supposed to pick up on - the fact that they should evaluate the same. Learn 2 humor dude.

Re:Sorry, Did Not Listen (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40921305)

They know nobody will RTFA, so probably they know their audience very well.

Re:Sorry, Did Not Listen (1)

lorenlal (164133) | about 2 years ago | (#40945145)

Plus, I'm pretty sure a transcript would result in a TL;DR, so I'm concurring.

Re:Sorry, Did Not Listen (1)

noh8rz6 (2689737) | about 2 years ago | (#40925257)

tl;dr. I can't stand real-time information flow - too slow, I get impatient.

I wonder.... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40919961)

Who really cares? And there seems to be a lot of retrospectives about him and Slashdot lately.

can't watch vid (Linux Mint) (1)

Penurious Penguin (2687307) | about 2 years ago | (#40920115)

Running Linux Mint 13 (Mate ed.) and it plays neither on firefox or midori. Is there another source to watch this? wget -O taco http://player.ooyala.com/static/cacheable/444fd7076af0334709af3684f7f0e127/player_v2.swf [ooyala.com] -- (fail). Any suggestions?

Re:can't watch vid (Linux Mint) (1)

jones_supa (887896) | about 2 years ago | (#40920315)

Here we talk all day long about open formats but even Slashdot shows that at the end of the day Flash is the bees knees.

Re:can't watch vid (Linux Mint) (1)

Penurious Penguin (2687307) | about 2 years ago | (#40920521)

Might just be an awkwardly configured system on my part, but youtube and even vimeo work well enough. I'd never heard of ooyala before posting the parent.

Re:can't watch vid (Linux Mint) (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40921557)

What? What? That's nonsense. It's not a configuration issue. Haven't you heard? Linux is the most advanced OS and it works out of the box everytime. Don't question it, it's teh Linux!!!!onehundredeleven!!! You must be a big Windoze l0z3r....

Re:can't watch vid (Linux Mint) (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40920359)

How do you feel about your fancy Linux now? No one uses that crap anyway.

Re:can't watch vid (Linux Mint) (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40933877)

I actually use 'this poop'. Different distro - and it's totally the shit.

Compressed SWF format not supported (1)

dgharmon (2564621) | about 2 years ago | (#40920967)

It plays here OK on Firefox/Chrome under Ubuntu 12.04. When I try and play in in xine/vlc/mplayer I get "Compressed SWF format not supported".

No One Give a Shit (0, Flamebait)

sexconker (1179573) | about 2 years ago | (#40920145)

No one gives a shit
Slashdot is the pits
Why are you such a tool?

Fuck your ugly face
You fucking sold this place
And now you
think you're cool?

One last question now
Can you tell me how
To profit
off of fools?

Is it astrotruf?
Paid-off trolls and smurfs?
UI that
ignores the rules?

I've got hate and spite
For this shitty site
Slashdot sucks
AC RULES!

Re:No One Give a Shit (1)

Quiet_Desperation (858215) | about 2 years ago | (#40921179)

"That's why Slytherins all sing, Malda is our king"

Who? (3, Insightful)

jfengel (409917) | about 2 years ago | (#40920153)

Oh, it's all so 2011.

Re:Who? (2)

jokkebk (175614) | about 2 years ago | (#40928377)

I have to say I'm not certain why all these "Rob Malda gets a job" and "Rob Malda discusses Reddit" articles that have appeared since he resigned from Slashdot are relevant news for nerds. I've been following the site since the nineties, and with the exception of few posts (like the proposal mentioned earlier), the editors were never a focus in the posts, but the news instead.

I would assume the people who wanted to follow CmdrTaco more carefully could, like, follow his personal website or something. At least to me, the Slashdot culture has never centered around any figureheads, but the community and commenters (and of course Rob Malda was an integral part of both for a long time).

At least this three-part interview series could've been timed to occur more closely with the 15 year anniversary, now it just feels like free PR push.

Transcript, please. (3, Interesting)

heptapod (243146) | about 2 years ago | (#40920169)

Enough with the video.

Re:Transcript, please. (2, Funny)

avandesande (143899) | about 2 years ago | (#40920867)

Yeah, like you were going to RTFA anyway ;-)

Will there be meetups like we did for 10? (1)

Chas (5144) | about 2 years ago | (#40920181)

Just checking.

Had a blast at the last one.

Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40920251)

Yep. Except it's not a meetup, it's a hookup. And you don't need a special occasion. Just install the grindr app on your android phone to meet like-minded slashdot and linux users.

Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40921741)

Yep. Except it's not a meetup, it's a hookup. And you don't need a special occasion. Just install the grindr app on your android phone to meet like-minded slashdot and linux users.

Thanks for that one /sarcasm ...from now until the end of time, Google is going to be aware I searched the android market place for 'grindr' and think I'm a queermo.

Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? (2)

TheRaven64 (641858) | about 2 years ago | (#40929159)

Thanks for that one /sarcasm ...from now until the end of time, Google is going to be aware I searched the android market place for 'grindr' and think I'm a queermo.

So, which of the following are the reasons that this worries you?

  • You're in the closet and don't want to be accidentally outed by Google.
  • You're violently homophobic and frightened of anyone thinking you might be gay.
  • You are worried by the thought that Google's database about you may contain errors making it less valuable when they sell the use of your personal information to advertisers.

Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? (1)

clovis (4684) | about 2 years ago | (#40921127)

And should it be limited to people with slashdot ID's of 4 digits or fewer?

Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? (1)

Zontar The Mindless (9002) | about 2 years ago | (#40922205)

Yes.

Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? (4, Funny)

Fnord666 (889225) | about 2 years ago | (#40922713)

And should it be limited to people with slashdot ID's of 4 digits or fewer?

Yes it should. Just be sure to schedule it in time for the early bird specials and wrap it up before 8pm so everyone can get to bed on time.

Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? (2)

Anthony (4077) | about 2 years ago | (#40940105)

Naturally yes. I like the early-bed time, but the sun never sets on Slashdot.

Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? (1)

sandman71 (95834) | about 2 years ago | (#40933349)

Way to discriminate against people with 5 digits. sheesh! :P

Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? (1)

Chas (5144) | about 2 years ago | (#40936989)

Well SOMEONE needs to call you people out on your conspicuous consumption of extra digits!

What does it mean 'what would it become'? (2)

roman_mir (125474) | about 2 years ago | (#40920243)

I mean what do you think /. is? Maybe it's something that I don't understand at all, it's a forum, it's an advertising platform, it has themes that are supposedly geared towards technology (but also plenty of flaming... well, that's an advertising technique).

But I don't get it probably, what does Malda mean by 'what it will become'? What could it become, except diluted over time? It's like a newsgroup, maybe it's IRC with memory, but what is he talking about?

Re:What does it mean 'what would it become'? (1)

TaoPhoenix (980487) | about 2 years ago | (#40921189)

He got a class on "Business Speak" somewhere. When you leave a major undertaking, presuming it's not a sinking ship, you speak of it in multi-tenses.

Re:What does it mean 'what would it become'? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40923385)

I mean what do you think /. is

well, based on your posts, it is apparently a recruitment board for your cult. a long time ago it used to be a place to talk about technology but then it got run over by the likes of yourself and other like-minded adherents to your religion.

who cares (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40920283)

Taco is gay.

Slashdot's decline and irrelivancy (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40920725)

They should ask him what he thinks of Slashdot's decline due to an increasing moronic userbase. This site used to be about open source advocacy, yet now half the people on here are using closed source Apple products. Will Slashdot even be around in a year or two?

Re:Slashdot's decline and irrelivancy (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40921003)

Yeah! And the fuckers can't spell either!

Re:Slashdot's decline and irrelivancy (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40936255)

And the telemarketers can't spell either!

FTFY

Re:Slashdot's decline and irrelivancy (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40922037)

They should ask him what he thinks of Slashdot's decline due to an increasing moronic userbase. This site used to be about open source advocacy, yet now half the people on here are using closed source Apple products. Will Slashdot even be around in a year or two?

What? Why with innovations like SlashBI [slashdot.org] , SlashCloud [slashdot.org] , and SlashDatacenter [slashdot.org] I'm sure Slashdot will be around for many years to come!

But seriously, does anyone read those 'channels'? Each one has one or two guys writing a dozen or so fluff pieces a day, and I'm not seeing much in the way of comments the one or two times I've bothered to check them. and they reek of corporate meddling.

I miss '97 (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40920957)

Gosh remember '97? Back then a post this would have likely read: "this, that, and the other." instead of the grammatically incorrect and awkward "this and that and the other,"

25 comments @ 2:59 ? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40921159)

Wow. Just wow.

In the olden days this would have been a a 1200 post troll-fest.
Now the trolls don't even care Taco.

Re:25 comments @ 2:59 ? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40922735)

Damn straight, you gerbil.

Hugs and kisses,

Juan Epstein

You in5ensitive clod! (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40921977)

move any equipment A8d she ran

Low comment count explained (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40922193)

Three hours after this is posted and there's still less than 40 comments, half of them are trolls or off topic. Kinda makes you think that no one really cares about Taco... and that Slashdot is falling apart due to techno-political ramblings that only get comments from fanatics so they can pound their chests.
 
But, hey, it's all about page hits anyway anymore. I guess Slashdot found it's bread and butter.

Someone needs to learn how to use compression (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40922821)

This audio is RAW - any chance for parts 2 and 3 we can get some compression? I'd be more than happy to help!

Ah, 1997. (0)

Kaz Kylheku (1484) | about 2 years ago | (#40923065)

I think I joined in late 1997 or early 1998.

Four digit user ID club. :)

Re:Ah, 1997. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40923479)

i could have had 4 digit user id if i hadn't already decided to never sign up to another site that demanded a signup.
the last straw was when microsoft bought hotmail. and it's all been downhill from there.

and i've been proudly lurking all this time.

Re:Ah, 1997. (1)

Kaz Kylheku (1484) | about 2 years ago | (#40925477)

Whoa, quite the early adopter of that particular oath! :)

My review of Rob Malda. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40923227)

No intelligence. Less pizazz than a common boor. Lame.

Dumb and dumber (1)

damn_registrars (1103043) | about 2 years ago | (#40923355)

Malda left after destroying what used to be a good website. Now, we let the resident king of editorial failure [slashdot.org] go and interview him. What, exactly, do we expect to be learned from this? Or is samzenpus just trying to get interview tips from Rob so he has a chance at a job after this site finally dies?

Re:Dumb and dumber (1)

FatAlb3rt (533682) | about 2 years ago | (#40986087)

And yet... here you are.

Well... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#40930307)

With sites like Digg (up til a couple years ago) and Reddit (nowadays), Slashdot has become something rather, behind-the-times. Most news stories on Slashdot tend to be days behind what's already on Reddit.

The tyrant will (1)

FrontDoors (2701269) | about 2 years ago | (#40944541)

The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny. - The right words, yeah!
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>