Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Amazon's Winding Course Through the Patent Jungle

samzenpus posted more than 2 years ago | from the mine-now dept.

Patents 13

ericjones12398 writes "On one hand, Amazon is not exactly short on patents themselves. The 'non-exhaustive list' on the company's site is a tidy little bundle of e-commerce IP, with a few questionable software patents — including a 1-click buying method, a Lodsys-baiting in-app purchasing method and a social networking patent, all of which have achieved a somewhat notorious reputation. Indeed, the last fiscal year was as significant for Amazon's litigation as for the company's behind-closed-doors acquisitions."

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

One Click (2)

eWarz (610883) | more than 2 years ago | (#40974385)

IIRC Amazon has successfully sued (and won) over the one click patent in the past. I could be wrong though.

Re:One Click (1)

Kenja (541830) | more than 2 years ago | (#40974457)

I know of (and can find no) instance where Amazon one-click went to court. It has however been settled out of court many times and licensed to more or less all takers.

Fuck Amazon (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40974387)

Fuck Amazon and its asshole CEO Bezos. He can lick my unwiped, shit-encrusted anus.

Re:Fuck Amazon (5, Funny)

Kenja (541830) | more than 2 years ago | (#40974467)

Think you need this... [amazon.com]

Re:Fuck Amazon (1)

evafan76 (2527608) | more than 2 years ago | (#40980057)

You sir, made me spray Mountain Dew through my nose which ruined my keyboard... I hope you're happy...

Cliffhanger (3, Informative)

ceoyoyo (59147) | more than 2 years ago | (#40974455)

And on the other hand?

*Skims the article*

Oh, the "other hand" seems to be talking about patents the author thinks Amazon would like to have. So not really the other hand at all.

I'm not going to comment on whether Internet journalism has decreased the quality of information in news articles, but it certainly seems to have decreased the quality of writing.

Re:Cliffhanger (4, Insightful)

postbigbang (761081) | more than 2 years ago | (#40974523)

Blogs != journalism.

There is Internet journalism, it is rare today, and some of it can be found on blogs. But the intersection of sets of journalism and blogs produces a small number at best.

Re:Cliffhanger (1)

ceoyoyo (59147) | more than 2 years ago | (#40975789)

I agree with you, but a great many people, including a LOT here on Slashdot, believe that "citizen journalism" i.e. blogs, ARE journalism and that traditional journalism should wither and die.

Re:Cliffhanger (4, Interesting)

postbigbang (761081) | more than 2 years ago | (#40975911)

Journalists have done little to dispel the notion. Bloggers, OTOH, have done much to try to make themselves look like journalists. Often both sides succumb to their own bias, repeat memes as fact, and believe that they're somehow at war with a real or imagined foe. The corporate pressure to ally themselves with other corporate clients also instills a discipline onto the output of journalists, especially freelancers, by purchase of articles that when added together, ally a bias towards the publisher's customers. Truly free and unbiased journalism and research is wickedly difficult to come by these days.

Re:Cliffhanger (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40978693)

On one hand, the kind of patents that Amazon has.
On the other hand, the tech media is speculating that Amazon wants a different kind.

Good to know you can judge writing quality by skimming, though. Comprehension is for suckers!

IBM (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40974561)

IBM has ~35,000 patents. Amazon is just a small fish.

Re:IBM (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40978263)

IBM has ~35,000 patents. Amazon is just a small fish.

Curious example as IBM is the worlds most active company in patents ~20 years strong. EVERYONE is small fish compared to IBM....

Re:IBM (1)

Errol backfiring (1280012) | more than 2 years ago | (#40982173)

IBM has ~35,000 patents.

Am I really the only one who sees this as a totally absurd number for any company? This should even be a big number for an entire country when it includes all the patents since they were introduced centuries ago.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?