×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Monkeys Made Smarter With Prosthetic Device

Soulskill posted about a year and a half ago | from the brain-damaged-coke-monkeys dept.

Biotech 102

An anonymous reader writes "Scientists have successfully restored and, in some cases, enhanced decision-making ability in brain-damaged monkeys on cocaine by connecting a prosthetic device to their brains. 'In the study, the scientists trained five monkeys to match multiple images on a computer screen until they were correct 70 to 75 percent of the time. First, an image appeared on the screen, which the animals were trained to select using a hand-controlled cursor. The screen then went blank for up to two minutes, followed by the reappearance of two to eight images, including the initial one, on the same screen. When the monkeys correctly chose the image they were shown first, the electronic prosthetic device recorded the pattern of neural pulses associated with their decision by employing a multi-input multi-output nonlinear (MIMO) mathematical model, developed by researchers at the University of Southern California. In the next phase of the study, a drug known to disrupt cognitive activity, cocaine, was administered to the animals to simulate brain injury. When the animals repeated the image-selection task, their decision-making ability decreased 13 percent from normal. However, during these "drug sessions," the MIMO prosthesis detected when the animals were likely to choose the wrong image and played back the previously recorded "correct" neural patterns for the task. According to the study findings, the MIMO device was exceedingly effective in restoring the cocaine-impaired decision-making ability to an improved level of 10 percent above normal, even when the drug was still present and active.'"

cancel ×
This is a preview of your comment

No Comment Title Entered

Anonymous Coward 1 minute ago

No Comment Entered

102 comments

Applications? (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341167)

Is there a place that would benefit from smarter crackheads?

Re:Applications? (1)

History's Coming To (1059484) | about a year and a half ago | (#41342533)

No, but I'd imagine this might have applications in people who have suffered brain injuries. It sounds like they can essentially use some kind of resonance effect, so if this can be replicated for people who can physically walk but can "no longer remember how" then it's potentially useful. However, if they're simply playing back a pre-recorded action then there is limited application, it's not going to revive lost speech centers for example, and extensive physiotherapy which helps to develop new pathways to pick up from lost ones is arguably a better long-term solution.

Re:Applications? (1)

Jeng (926980) | about a year and a half ago | (#41346295)

it's not going to revive lost speech centers for example

The device is able to read neural activity, and playback neural activity. Lets say the speech center is lost, when this technology is a little more mature you could pump speech center communications to the different parts of the brain while offloading the actual processing to a device.

Looks like it we might just see cyberneticly augmented intelligence in our lifetimes after all.

Re:Applications? (1)

History's Coming To (1059484) | about a year and a half ago | (#41347269)

We've arguably got it already. Mobile phones "augmenting" pub quiz teams are a big problem.

I did wonder about speech, but if you're simply playing back the neural activity that generates "hello" then you have to tell the device to do it, and giving the command "say(hello)" might as well lead to a speech synthesizer. Walking, however, is a repetitive activity that could be controlled by this for minutes or hours with one command.

This is awesome! (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341217)

I'm so glad we're working this hard on making monkeys smarter now that all humans have an IQ higher than 120. DERP.

The implications of brain stimulation (1)

Dwedit (232252) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341241)

This thing is replaying back some kind of message to affect what your brain is going to do.
So when is it going to be turned into a brainwashing device to make sure you love the Dear Leader?

Re:The implications of brain stimulation (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341377)

"I'll dial for both of us, Rick said, and led her back into the bedroom. There, at her console, he dialed 594: pleased acknowledgment of husband's superior wisdom in all matters. On his own console he dialed for a creative and fresh attitude toward his job, although this he hardly needed; such was his habitual, innate approach without recourse to Penfield artificial brain stimulation.

Re:The implications of brain stimulation (1)

ilsaloving (1534307) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341617)

For some reason I was expecting there to be something about galloping abs at the end.

Re:The implications of brain stimulation (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41343699)

I'm sure the researchers will get the funding for it as soon as possible.

Re:The implications of brain stimulation (1)

Jeng (926980) | about a year and a half ago | (#41346311)

So when is it going to be turned into a brainwashing device to make sure you love the Dear Leader?

Right after it is used on the criminally insane and pedophiles to make them productive members of society.

That is unnecessarily cruel (3, Funny)

0xdeadbeef (28836) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341267)

Just let them wear a suit and go to business school. It's what they really want.

yessss (4, Funny)

binarylarry (1338699) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341273)

Fuck sharks, I want hyper intelligent, semi retarded cocaine monkeys with lasers on their heads!

Issue iPads to Congress. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41342251)

Although the Congressmen won't get any smarter.

Re:yessss (1)

gewalker (57809) | about a year and a half ago | (#41342289)

I don't know, but it sounds that being paid to be a to do stuff like this would be pretty awesome too. Maybe I can make a career change and become a researcher too.

Reading Flowers for Algernon [wikipedia.org] or watching the movie Charlie [imdb.com] could be considered research too.

Give it time... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41342315)

> I want hyper intelligent, semi retarded cocaine monkeys with lasers on their heads!

Be patient. I'm sure that the military is working on that...

I, for one.... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41343473)

...certainly do not welcome any brain damaged coke-head monkey overlords... not even with prosthetic implants in their brains. We already got enough of their type in WashDC as it is.

Fuck these assholes (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341293)

So next can we simulate brain damage in these researchers by feeding them cocaine?

Re:Fuck these assholes (1)

Jeng (926980) | about a year and a half ago | (#41346367)

So next can we simulate brain damage in these researchers by feeding them cocaine?

Yea! That will teach them, force them to snort cocaine.

Smarter or just less impaired? (1)

icebike (68054) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341309)

The feed back device didn't improve the monkey's intelligence, it simply undid some of the damage the crack did to them.
At best its a retraining aid, and its not clear if it had any long term effect after discontinuing the feedback.

Since each feedback profile was learned from the monkey itself, there's no indication that you could apply that pattern to
other monkeys, or the undamaged monkeys to make them learn quicker.

But hey, good on those researchers to induce brain damage with cocaine so that no physical harm needed to be done to the monkeys.
Ah, shucks, then the went and ruined it by two surgeries to implant and remove electrodes drilled thru the skull and cemented in place.

Re:Smarter or just less impaired? (3, Informative)

bbecker23 (1917560) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341795)

The feed back device didn't improve the monkey's intelligence, it simply undid some of the damage the crack did to them.

Really? Not even going to RTFS?

According to the study findings, the MIMO device was exceedingly effective in restoring the cocaine-impaired decision-making ability to an improved level of 10 percent above normal, even when the drug was still present and active.'"

Emphasis mine. Your other points may be valid, but this technique certainly did more than just undo the effects of the drug.

Re:Smarter or just less impaired? (1)

marcosdumay (620877) | about a year and a half ago | (#41347605)

Except that "normal" here means what the control group did, after receiving the cocaine.

It looks more like a mind backup (or control) tech than a mand amplifying one.

SHOCK THE MONKEY !! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341331)

And watch him writhe in pain !! They do that, you know !! And then there were three !!

Guenter (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341337)

All I want out of life is to be a monkey of moderate intelligence who wears a suit. That's why I've decided to transfer to business school!

Great News (1, Funny)

lewko (195646) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341347)

"Scientists have successfully restored and, in some cases, enhanced decision-making ability in brain-damaged monkeys on cocaine

So there may be hope for the Occupy movement after all!

Re:Great News (2, Insightful)

Required Snark (1702878) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341791)

You've got it backwards. The Occupy movement has had a significant real world impact. It brought the issue of effective tax rates for the rich into the presidential race, including the obscenely low 15% tax rate paid by Romney.

http://media.talkingpointsmemo.com/slideshow/mitt-romney-taxes [talkingpointsmemo.com]

Now that Mitt Romney's confirmed what we've long suspected about his effective federal tax rate -- "It's probably closer to the 15 percent rate than anything" -- we have a fact worth contextualizing. Though it could easily be less, assume Romney effectively pays 15 percent in taxes on all his income to the federal government. How does he stack up to the rest of us, most of whom are regular wage earners? When you account for the fact that most people also pay payroll taxes, and don't enjoy enormous deductions, credits or other benefits, you see that Romney's making out about as well as a taxpayer who makes $50,000 a year. Not bad for a man whose net worth is estimated to be in the neighborhood of a quarter billion dollars.

Meanwhile, the Republican controlled House has voted 33 times in 18 months to repeal Obamacare.

http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/healthcare/Republicans-Vote-to-Repeal-Obamacare--Again-and-Again.html [philly.com]

Breaking news!! The House of Representative voted to repeal all of Obamacare – for the 33rd time.

In a recurring political ritual, Republicans in the chamber denounced the law as a government takeover and said that all of it has to go. Then they backed up their statements with a vote.

The action has virtually no chance of becoming law. The Democratic majority in the Senate is certain to block it. And if for some reason it does not, Obama has promised to veto it.

So who is acting more like a troupe of cognitively impaired monkeys? I would bet that after so many failed attempts the monkeys would have given up and moved on to something more useful.

Score: Monkeys 1, Republicans 0. It's not fair to compare either monkeys or Republicans to the Occupy movement because they are not playing in the same league.

Re:Great News (1)

LordLimecat (1103839) | about a year and a half ago | (#41342147)

So, its news that Republicans voted to repeal the ACA for the 33rd time (and it makes them retarded), but none of that applies to the Democrats voting to overturn that repeal bill for the 33rd time?

I like the double standard, its the sort of thing that keeps one on their toes.

Re:Great News (2)

SydShamino (547793) | about a year and a half ago | (#41342395)

Maybe you don't know how Congress works? No one has to "vote to overturn" the repeal bill - it dies automatically when it's never taken up by the Senate, the same as the last 32 times.

Re:Great News (2, Insightful)

sjames (1099) | about a year and a half ago | (#41342435)

The Democrat's action in that case is actually working. It isn't retarded to apply a successful strategy successfully multiple times.

Re:Great News (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41342551)

I think anyone who identifies as Republican or Democrat is a retard, but you sir (who apparently identifies as a Republican) are providing ammunition, in your post, for your rivals.

Really, think about what you wrote, and see if you can identify the logical fallacies in your post. Almost laughed out loud, as I was reading it.

Re:Great News (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41344653)

"Scientists have successfully restored and, in some cases, enhanced decision-making ability in brain-damaged monkeys on cocaine

So there may be hope for the Occupy movement after all!

Funny, the first thing I thought when I read the article was that there might be some hope for the 1%

Seriously, cocaine is a rich peoples drug

Unintentional humor? (4, Funny)

Carnildo (712617) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341349)

There's just something about the phrase "decision-making ability in brain-damaged monkeys on cocaine"....

Re:Unintentional humor? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41343959)

Yeah, putting monkeys on cocaine is so funny

Re:Unintentional humor? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41344547)

That's the exact line that made me look at this article!

Re:Unintentional humor? (1)

kubusja (581677) | about a year and a half ago | (#41344633)

>There's just something about the phrase "decision-making ability in >brain-damaged monkeys on cocaine".... Potential applications in financial, military, law and media sectors are enormous....

Planet of the Apes (2, Funny)

Ice Station Zebra (18124) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341365)

George Taylor said, "Take your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape!"

Re:Planet of the Apes (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41342679)

Cornelius? Is that you?

Let me get this straight (1)

Eddy_D (557002) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341423)

Brain damaged monkeys... High on cocaine. ... playing MMOs.... ... Are you sure its not April 1?

Re:Let me get this straight (1)

drkim (1559875) | about a year and a half ago | (#41342229)

Brain damaged monkeys, high on cocaine, playing MMOs, human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria!

Re:Let me get this straight (1)

Jeng (926980) | about a year and a half ago | (#41346389)

I thought the brain damaged cocaine monkeys played FPS's, not MMO's?

this is your brain (4, Funny)

circletimessquare (444983) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341445)

(holds up egg)

this is your brain on drugs

(cracks egg in frying pan)

this is your brain on drugs on cybernetics

(hundreds of little robots swarm and deftly fuse the egg back together)

any questions?

Re:this is your brain (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341829)

any questions?

Where's my side order of bacon?

Re:this is your brain (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41342223)

Monkey bacon... no thanks.

New Game (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341455)

Sounds more like the monkeys learned a new game rather than gained intelligence, there is to applicability.

Bad Summary as usual (0)

drsmack1 (698392) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341495)

The monkeys are not smarter. What the researchers did was drug them and then introduce a system that helps them overcome the artificial impediment placed on them.

Stupid study, does not belong on slashdot.

Does this "prosthetic" look like a bowler hat? (1)

conspirator23 (207097) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341551)

I smell a patent infringement lawsuit from Professor Farnsworth!

Re:Does this "prosthetic" look like a bowler hat? (1)

quenda (644621) | about a year and a half ago | (#41342399)

I smell a patent infringement lawsuit from Professor Farnsworth!

I hope that Smelloscope is appropriately licensed. Since the Sonny Bono Head Act, patents from 3012 are indefinitely retrospective.

Wow! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341565)

braindamagedmonkeysoncocaine.tumblr.com

Such overwhelming compassion... (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341577)

... from the Slashdot idiots. Not one of you can FEEL what others feel, can you. Truly pathetic. Children pretending to be adults.

This is more scientific FRAUD, committed by sociopaths who enjoy torturing animals.

Here's a simple question for you: when did you CHOOSE to be born human, and not be born an animal?

Re:Such overwhelming compassion... (1)

YttriumOxide (837412) | about a year and a half ago | (#41344191)

This is more scientific FRAUD, committed by sociopaths who enjoy torturing animals.

What makes you assume the monkeys didn't thoroughly enjoy the experience?
I can say from experience that taking cocaine is not entirely unpleasant (I wouldn't do it again; but the two or three times I tried it, it was a lot of fun for a short period of time; followed by disappointment that the feelings go away so quickly)

And besides, even if it WAS committed by sociopaths who enjoy torturing animals, that doesn't make it scientific fraud (as long as they correctly recorded results and didn't distort anything).

Smarter? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341587)

If the machine is only acting when they're wrong, isn't the machine the one making the decision? And when the monkey's decision disagrees, it effectively overrides their brain with the "correct" impulses? ((insert obligatory monkey-Borg reference))

Read the 'research' paper... (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341639)

... to see how truly fucked up the monsters are who committed these atrocities.

http://iopscience.iop.org/1741-2552/9/5/056012/article

Just read it - and try to think about the poor creatures who were being tortured on a daily basis.

Funny how there is no VIDEO footage of what they did to them, isn't it? You'd have thought that in this day and age, where recording video is dirt cheap, other 'scientists' (LOL) would benefit from SEEING the 'research' actually being performed...

And again, let me say how pathetic you Slashdot sociopaths are, truly sickening. Every time there is a bullshit article about some 'promising research' involving torturing animals to death, not one of you thinks about them and their suffering. My, aren't we mature! I'm an adult now, I don't care about animals! I'm all grown up'n'shit. Idiots.

Re:Read the 'research' paper... (1)

wierd_w (1375923) | about a year and a half ago | (#41342071)

If you are proposing that the scientists should use humans instead, because humans can consent, and animals cannot, then by all means! Drive yourself down there and fill in the forms before the public notary, and get into the hospital gown.

If, however, you are just creaming out your ass because scientists are doing science, and it makes you feel 'ow swo bwad fwor de widdle monkwies', and would rather that humans live in the stone age than experiment on other lieforms to larn how living things work, and in so doing, push the boundries of scentific knowledge and medical technologies, then kind find a fire, pour gasoline all over yourself, and step into it.

Re:Read the 'research' paper... (1)

drkim (1559875) | about a year and a half ago | (#41344901)

If you are proposing that the scientists should use humans instead, because humans can consent, and animals cannot, then by all means! Drive yourself down there and fill in the forms before the public notary, and get into the hospital gown.

If, however, you are just creaming out your ass because scientists are doing science, and it makes you feel 'ow swo bwad fwor de widdle monkwies', and would rather that humans live in the stone age than experiment on other lieforms to larn how living things work, and in so doing, push the boundries of scentific knowledge and medical technologies, then kind find a fire, pour gasoline all over yourself, and step into it.

Great post!
The thought that always crosses my mind when I read a label that says: NOT TESTED ON ANIMALS ...is always:
"Great. They're testing this stuff on ME."

Re:Read the 'research' paper... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41342293)

Are you a vegan? Are you wearing leather shoes by any chance?

Re:Read the 'research' paper... (1)

dinfinity (2300094) | about a year and a half ago | (#41344067)

Unless you're a Buddhist, there are probably billions of 'animals' that you couldn't care less about.

Most of us realize that drawing the line somewhere between amphibians and mammals and/or based on the ease of anthropomorphization is irrational.

Actually (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341823)

It was 100% of the time. It's just that the monkeys were that much smarter than we were.

I'll probably see it right after I post... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41341973)

But this is obviously being developed to lower the shortcomings of politicians right?

WTF? (4, Insightful)

mordejai (702496) | about a year and a half ago | (#41341991)

Am I the only one that finds it disturbing that a scientific study gives a dangerous drug to primates in 2012?

Re:WTF? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41342233)

Yes, now where's mine!

Re:WTF? (4, Insightful)

jrumney (197329) | about a year and a half ago | (#41343125)

Yes. The rest of us realise that controlled clinical administration of drugs has no relation to the hysteria surrounding street drugs, regardless of whether the substances are the same.

Re:WTF? (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41343799)

After the study those monkeys had a party like it was 1999.

Re:WTF? (2)

Air-conditioned cowh (552882) | about a year and a half ago | (#41344349)

Am I the only one that finds it disturbing that a scientific study gives a dangerous drug to primates in 2012?

It's like feeding caviare to pigs! What a terrible waste.

Re:WTF? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41344843)

No, but most people here on slashdotters commenting on these type of articles seem sociopathic/unable to feel empathy which makes you wonder how old they are... or if there's something seriously wrong with them.

Re:WTF? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41344993)

They should give it to bankers in charge of the economy instead. Oh, wait.

Lawsuit coming (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41342053)

Apple already has patents for iOS, iPhone and other iDevices which induce a false sense of intellectual superiority amongst its most ardent users.

Research grants (2)

funkboy (71672) | about a year and a half ago | (#41342255)

Just goes to prove that a sufficiently talented grant application writer can get a research grant for just about anything...

BTW, what happens when they give the monkeys THC and then turn on the device? Do they stop craving pop-tarts & crappy comedy movies or something?

Strictly speaking (1)

inode_buddha (576844) | about a year and a half ago | (#41342987)

Strictly speaking, a strap-on is also a prosthetic device. I wonder if anyone ever put one on a monkey?

Re:Strictly speaking (1)

stretch0611 (603238) | about a year and a half ago | (#41344075)

Personally, I find that idea pretty disgusting.

But, as long as the monkey is willing to do it and you are not forcing him, I do not care what you are doing in the privacy of your own home.

Good news, everyone!!! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41343351)

Good news, everyone!!!

I'm in (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41343541)

I'd like to volunteer myself for the human trials.

Future primitive (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41343849)

Planet of the apes anyone?

Hasn't anyone ever used Cocaine? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41344073)

Those monkeys must have been damn near overdose, or given the drug at high doses over a long period of time to result in loss of cognitive functionality at that base level. I mean, the Coca in Coca-cola comes from the Cocaine we used to put in it. It's not like a small dose is going to cause brain damage... So, these must have been some SERIOUSLY cocaine addled animals.

That said, fuck the cocaine. Where's the damn control group where the regular monkeys used the prosthetic device to help them remember more quickly which decision to make? When you miss a control group that big, the study is hogwash. The effects of organic chemicals like cocaine are wildly unpredictable. Hell, Just like Caffeine helps coders code, so does cocaine (when taken in moderation) -- They're both stimulants. This study is bullshit.

Re:Hasn't anyone ever used Cocaine? (2)

YttriumOxide (837412) | about a year and a half ago | (#41344221)

Hasn't anyone ever used Cocaine?

Two or three times, yes... but I decided it's really not for me. I find the "high" doesn't last long; and there was significant impairment in my ability to rationalise decisions (especially those relating to social behaviour - similar problem to alcohol but without the messiness and stumbling all over the place)

Those monkeys must have been damn near overdose, or given the drug at high doses over a long period of time to result in loss of cognitive functionality at that base level.

I don't think they actually CAUSED brain damage using cocaine. They simulated it using cocaine. See the bit I wrote above about impairment in my ability to rationalise.

That said, fuck the cocaine. Where's the damn control group where the regular monkeys used the prosthetic device to help them remember more quickly which decision to make? When you miss a control group that big, the study is hogwash.

I generally agree with you here. It does seem odd to skip the control group of monkeys that weren't given something to simulate brain damage. Especially since their results apparently showed these "damaged" monkeys performing better with the assistance of the device than they performed with neither the device nor the cocaine.

The effects of organic chemicals like cocaine are wildly unpredictable. Hell, Just like Caffeine helps coders code, so does cocaine (when taken in moderation) -- They're both stimulants.

In very light moderation, it might help; but large amounts of either is going to damage my coding. Being impulsive; not stopping to think about better ways to do things; etc. These effects come from both caffeine and cocaine, it's true; but caffeine is easier to moderate to a small dose in general (and legal - not that that bothers me for other substances I do like to take on rare occasions; but for something I use daily like caffeine, I'd be wary about replacing that with cocaine!)

Rise of the Planet of the Apes - Journal (1)

nomad-9 (1423689) | about a year and a half ago | (#41344765)

Caesar, one of our lab monkeys on cocaine with an electronically-enhanced brain, has escaped from the biotech facility and stole a truck full of our latest brain prosthetic devices and all our reserves of experimental hard drugs. He has liberated the zoo gorillas and baboons, and supplied them with electronic brain-enhancers and narcotics. The war on us humans has already begun and is raging as I'm writing this.
...
The end is near...We are dying...Crack-head monkeys have just broken into my office....Good bye, good bye, and God save us all..Aaaaaaargh..

Who is responsible? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41345083)

Ok. Who let Nick Swardson conduct science experiments?

Bukkshit (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41345777)

No wonder the human race is fked, still experimenting on animals.. pricks!

Awesome! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41346173)

I will start doing cocaine immediately.

Obligatory (1)

AragornSonOfArathorn (454526) | about a year and a half ago | (#41346285)

I, for one, welcome a Beowulf cluster of our retarded cyborg crackhead monkey overlords! Hot grits! Natalie Portman! etc.

Do they run Linux?

They didn't become smarter (1)

Hentes (2461350) | about a year and a half ago | (#41346559)

Reading the article this device sounds more like a memory extension than an intelligence booster. It just recorded the correct answers and played them back later. Still awesome, just not in a Planet of the apes kind of way.

Where do these guys get cocaine? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#41348383)

I would like to know how these guys got the cocaine. Please explain. Thank you. I will become a drug dealer with this knowledge.

Load More Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...