Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Ig Nobels Feature Exploding Colonoscopies, Left Leaning Views of Eiffel Tower

samzenpus posted about 2 years ago | from the get-your-prize dept.

It's funny.  Laugh. 91

alphadogg writes "The Ig Nobel Prize ceremony has honored a wide array of strange research and advancement over the years, from exploding pants to woodpecker headaches to aggressive parking enforcement, and Thursday night's ceremony in Cambridge, Mass., was no exception. Particular highlights included a Russian company that turns ammunition into trace amounts of diamond, Japanese engineers who developed a speech jamming device, and research into such critical topics as why coffee is so hard to carry without slopping and what makes a ponytail move the way it does."

cancel ×

91 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Speech Jamming Device (5, Funny)

BlkRb0t (1610449) | about 2 years ago | (#41408831)

Husbands, take notice.

Re:Speech Jamming Device (5, Funny)

William Robinson (875390) | about 2 years ago | (#41408945)

Husbands, take notice.

I would think about it later. Do they have anything on 'how to attract chicks'!!

Re:Speech Jamming Device (5, Funny)

NettiWelho (1147351) | about 2 years ago | (#41408953)

Money.

Re:Speech Jamming Device (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41409597)

Amazing. That's also how you get them to go away.

Re:Speech Jamming Device (5, Insightful)

Paradise Pete (33184) | about 2 years ago | (#41408955)

Do they have anything on 'how to attract chicks'!!

Step 1: Don't call them chicks.

Re:Speech Jamming Device (2)

K. S. Kyosuke (729550) | about 2 years ago | (#41409037)

Do they have anything on 'how to attract chicks'!!

Step 1: Don't call them chicks.

You think that poultry minds how the farmers call them? I thought they were only interested in pecking grain.

Re:Speech Jamming Device (2)

Paradise Pete (33184) | about 2 years ago | (#41410041)

No fowl jokes here please. Those go on the other side of the road.

Re:Speech Jamming Device (4, Funny)

broginator (1955750) | about 2 years ago | (#41409687)

Yeah, broads hate it when you call 'em chicks.

Re:Speech Jamming Device (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41414001)

That's right, it really gets on their tits.

Re:Speech Jamming Device (1)

kakaburra (2508064) | about 2 years ago | (#41408959)

Husbands and Slashdotters?.. You're funny

Re:Speech Jamming Device (3, Insightful)

epyT-R (613989) | about 2 years ago | (#41409125)

True.. compared with the average population, a greater percentage of slashdotters are used to social stigma which, ironically, made them resilient to peer pressure, including misandry-trained women and society. It makes sense that fewer of them would want to get married, even if they are relatively ungeeky and successful.

Re:Speech Jamming Device (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41409303)

Compared to the average population, a much greater percentage of slashdotters know the meaning of "misandry"!

"misandry-trained women and society" (1)

circletimessquare (444983) | about 2 years ago | (#41409409)

well, you for one are stigmatized for your own unique reason

Re:"misandry-trained women and society" (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41411373)

Hahahaha! Perfect! I cannot express the sentiment better when dealing with that MRA clown.

Re:"misandry-trained women and society" (1)

circletimessquare (444983) | about 2 years ago | (#41411919)

In a world where women are still treated like cattle, the idea of a men's rights movement: this is a joke, right?

Re:"misandry-trained women and society" (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41413163)

Cattle? Seriously?

Is it possible you mean chattel?

Re:"misandry-trained women and society" (1)

circletimessquare (444983) | about 2 years ago | (#41414735)

"Chattel" is old french. It means... drum roll please... cattle.

Re:"misandry-trained women and society" (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41417387)

It's just like conservative christians claiming they're being "oppressed" or "martyred". The whole standing up against oppression works so well for so many groups that now even the dominant groups (straight, white, cis, males) want to build some kind of oppression narrative for them. Fools. Greedy, self-centred, ignorant fools.

Re:"misandry-trained women and society" (5, Insightful)

epyT-R (613989) | about 2 years ago | (#41418541)

Hardly. Tell that to the men who've been destroyed by the kangaroo family courts in this country. When she's hurt by him, it's all over the news as a national outrage. When he's hurt by her, he's emasculated on morning talk shows for being, in some cases, quite literally emasculated (penis chopped off). The attitude that men are the first cause for all her troubles is entwined in pretty much all current television and music as well. Our culture equates female empowerment with histrionic, narcissistic little twats like kim kardiashian, and then it arms this adolescent attitude with the force of the law. The net result shakes out as the men still being held responsible for sexual outcomes as in the distant past, but now lack any of the power to make relevant decisions, with the exception to abstain in the hopes it'll mitigate the risk of accusation. These guys are then labeled pussies by their sexually active peers and as 'afraid of real women' by feminists.

She can make the decision to ruin him for any reason and that's that. A glance walking down a hallway, an unbuttoned shirt, or a date request.. it doesn't matter as it's 'assault' if she says it 'made her uncomfortable'. There's no accountability on her part for using 'her right to choose' responsibly, knowing neither of them have the money to raise a child. No need to when all it takes is a belated accusation to ruin his life and have the state bilk money out of his paycheck and give it to her. If she's got a problem with him, the solution is just a single false abuse accusation away.

There cannot be equal distribution of power without equal distribution of responsibility, and one cannot fight for equality while only considering the needs, whims, and interests, of one side without considering the other.

Re:"misandry-trained women and society" (1)

epyT-R (613989) | about 2 years ago | (#41418319)

Why not stand for rights for everyone instead of just women or not-white people? You'll never have equality (in any sense of the term) if you only support some sides and not others. Whether a group is treated well or not is immaterial to the hypocrisy their lobbyists commit when they're willing to trample others' rights along the way.

Re:"misandry-trained women and society" (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#41428031)

In a world where women are still treated like cattle, the idea of a men's rights movement: this is a joke, right?

That is what you get for not standing up to Henry Winkler and the Democrat's war on women!

Re:Speech Jamming Device (1)

drkim (1559875) | about 2 years ago | (#41415127)

Husbands and Slashdotters?.. You're funny

Those are two non-intersecting groups.

Re:Speech Jamming Device (2)

epyT-R (613989) | about 2 years ago | (#41409081)

histrionic wives should too... Is it still funny now?

Re:Speech Jamming Device (1)

Millennium (2451) | about 2 years ago | (#41409115)

There's a real Nobel Prize in the works for anyone who figures out how to use this thing over the Internet.

Re:Speech Jamming Device (2)

Longjmp (632577) | about 2 years ago | (#41409255)

Husbands don't need such a device.

They (we) seem to have a (genetically inherited?) ability to switch to bypass mode once the rant/chatter starts: In one ear, out by the other, without any significant effects.

Some females however claim that's only possible because there's nothing between the ears.

No significant effects? (1)

SmallFurryCreature (593017) | about 2 years ago | (#41409301)

Only a single male would say that. Just you forgot to switch the bypass mode off in the 10 seconds or so BEFORE your opinion is asked for. Your actual opinion of course won't matter, it never does, but you BETTER be reflect a complete and total comphression and capacity to recall in minute detail ALL information EVER given to you during your entire time AND any information she ever thought off which you should be able to get from her and everyone else she has known by mind reading IF you value your life.

Or you can go fishing. That works too. I hate fish, I hate the outdoors but I love fishing. Every second a blissful second without mental torture!

Re:No significant effects? (4, Insightful)

Longjmp (632577) | about 2 years ago | (#41409323)

Let me guess:
You're married for less than three years ;-)

Re:No significant effects? (4, Funny)

mcgrew (92797) | about 2 years ago | (#41411191)

What's the difference between a job and a wife?

After three years the job still sucks.

Re:No significant effects? (1)

Abreu (173023) | about 2 years ago | (#41409525)

Only a single male would say that. Just you forgot to switch the bypass mode off in the 10 seconds or so BEFORE your opinion is asked for. Your actual opinion of course won't matter, it never does, but you BETTER be reflect a complete and total comphression and capacity to recall in minute detail ALL information EVER given to you during your entire time AND any information she ever thought off which you should be able to get from her and everyone else she has known by mind reading IF you value your life.

Don't worry, that's a skill that all husbands develop after five or so years of marriage.

Re:No significant effects? (1)

sonamchauhan (587356) | about 2 years ago | (#41409737)

Actually, it does feel very tempting but the best thing to do is to _engage_ in the conversation with the spouse. BUT THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK, and ABOVE ALL, BE KIND.

Re:No significant effects? (1)

readin (838620) | about 2 years ago | (#41409845)

Your spouse is a man?

Re:No significant effects? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41463067)

Hell yes! Best decision I ever made.

Re:Speech Jamming Device (1)

mcgrew (92797) | about 2 years ago | (#41410847)

Your comment reminded me of a joke the preacher told during his sermon last Sunday. A doctor, a lawyer, and a preacher are out deer hunting. A big nine point buck comes into view and all three fire, and the buck goes down.

The lawyer says "But how can we tell whose shot hit the mark?" The doctor says, "well, let me examine the deer."

The doctor looks the deer over and says "the preacher shot this buck." The lawyer replies "really? How can you tell?"

The doator says "because the shot went in one ear and out the other!"

just getting 2nd post.... (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41408867)

because I don't have "a wide array of strange research and advancement over the years, from exploding pants to woodpecker headaches to aggressive parking enforcement" :-P

The real question is (1, Funny)

Hentes (2461350) | about 2 years ago | (#41408881)

Which way does the Pisa tower lean?

Re:The real question is (3, Funny)

isorox (205688) | about 2 years ago | (#41408947)

Which way does the Pisa tower lean?

Sideways. Apart from when Evil Superman fixes it.

Wrong, you fail (1)

SmallFurryCreature (593017) | about 2 years ago | (#41409307)

At TWO angles, it leans either forward or backwards but not sideways.

Re:The real question is (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41408989)

A quick zoom on Google maps shows that it leans towards the southeast
https://maps.google.com/maps?ll=43.723002,10.396473

Re:The real question is (3, Funny)

JustOK (667959) | about 2 years ago | (#41409185)

what does IOS6 maps show?

Re:The real question is (4, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41409319)

what does IOS6 maps show?

That it's switched places with a small, defunct candle factory near Shrewsbury.

Re:The real question is (1)

LordLimecat (1103839) | about 2 years ago | (#41410479)

Better not be left, those darn liberals already ruined the Eiffel tower.

Got to love public services... (5, Interesting)

Thammuz (970395) | about 2 years ago | (#41408895)

" LITERATURE PRIZE: The US Government General Accountability Office, for issuing a report about reports about reports that recommends the preparation of a report about the report about reports about reports.

REFERENCE: "Actions Needed to Evaluate the Impact of Efforts to Estimate Costs of Reports and Studies," US Government General Accountability Office report GAO-12-480R, May 10, 2012. "

Its a shame the guys who did this didn't get a mention: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18247680 [bbc.co.uk]
It had a been a subject of great debate a amongst my friends - other stouts not doing this was a point of confusion for a long time! (which of course lead to more testing....)

Re:Got to love public services... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41408949)

It's very rarely public service per se which is responsible for that sort of bureaucracy - it's usually that some right wing policy insists that a department is set up merely to oversee the cost-effectiveness of other departments. In the UK, at least, that department is then almost entirely outsourced to private auditors, who use it as nothing more than a source of corporate welfare.

The first prize on bra-cum-facemask is an old idea, though - and seeing all the white middle-class ageing men like perverts with bras against their faces was worth it for a reminder of where science still is.

Re:Got to love public services... (2)

Razgorov Prikazka (1699498) | about 2 years ago | (#41409039)

One starts to wonder if it is:
Red tape, red tape, red tape;
Red red red tape tape tape;
Or finally Red red red tape.
To speak in the words of Sir Bernard Woolley, MA (Oxon) GCB: What about a publicity campaign Minister, you know ADMINISTRATION SAVES THE NATION, RED TAPE IS FUN, full pages ads in ... in. Just an idea.

Re:Got to love public services... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41409147)

Property law is the most stifling red tape of all.

Artificial scarcity: we would all do without it.

Re:Got to love public services... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41409235)

but what if there isn't enough artificial scarcity!

Re:Got to love public services... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41409249)

Borrow someone else's handcuffs.

Re:Got to love public services... (1)

Razgorov Prikazka (1699498) | about 2 years ago | (#41409393)

Then we have to set-up a new agency overseeing the scarcity and reporting to the (also new) scarcity taskforce who in turn report to the (also newly installed) Minister of Scarcity. He in turn makes new scarcity laws and regulations and scarcity-tax. The latter has to be collected by the IRS, the former have to be implemented (and reported about), enforced (and reported about), and reported about. And of course we finally need a scarcity-ombudsman to see that no one has a monopoly, nor the government, nor any private entity. All those reports I just mentioned should be transparently written, placed under great scrutiny, and if necessary rewritten or partly reformulated, to achieve a level that is comprehensible by only the most educated of men. After long, laborious, intrinsically difficult procedures and of course the proper clearance one should be able to see a copy of the desired report in D.C.

All this to acquire the highest level of government accountability and achieve total transparency as promised by that guy you voted for last time!
Me. Thank you for your trust!

With warm regards,
Politician.

Re:Got to love public services... (2)

MiniMike (234881) | about 2 years ago | (#41409611)

" LITERATURE PRIZE: The US Government General Accountability Office, for issuing a report about reports about reports that recommends the preparation of a report about the report about reports about reports.

Thank you for reporting this.

Re:Got to love public services... (1)

TheRedSeven (1234758) | about 2 years ago | (#41410059)

Turtles all the way down.

Re:Got to love public services... (1)

danhaas (891773) | about 2 years ago | (#41414793)

Recirculation patterns are pretty common when the fluid flows through an expansion, specially if it's a sharp cut.

You can see it clearly in this case because of the gas bubbles, but this happens everywhere: next time you walk behind a building on the shore, watch the huge recirculation that the wind forms. This is usually how people with umbrellas end up wet "because of the crazy wind".

FUCK THAT !! IPHONE BABY !! IPHONE !! (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41408907)

Because I can !! That's why !!

IgNobels are a disservice to basic research (1)

Lincolnshire Poacher (1205798) | about 2 years ago | (#41409025)

Yes, let's all mock basic scientific research.

Sometimes "science" has to be done on basic, everyday things as a basis for future work.

For example, someone studying fuel ullage might be able to use the "coffee slopping" paper as a starting point for their work in future.

I suppose we could restrict scentists to only studying Serious Science, but then they'd have to do all this research as part of the Big Project anyway.

Re:IgNobels are a disservice to basic research (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41409055)

Perhaps you could do a study about: "The dislocation of slender ligneous articles from the lower digestive tract of homo sapiens"

Re:IgNobels are a disservice to basic research (5, Insightful)

ledow (319597) | about 2 years ago | (#41409087)

IgNobels are not really a disservice at all. They are a humorous recognition of the very thing you're talking about.

Nobody's discrediting those IgNobels (and, in fact, previous winners with quite high standing in their fields have always taken it with good humour and their science validated).

Bad science won't win an Ig Nobel. It's just unusual applications of good science that will.

Re:IgNobels are a disservice to basic research (5, Informative)

PolygamousRanchKid (1290638) | about 2 years ago | (#41409113)

From the Ig Nobel FAQ:

Are you ridiculing science?

No. We are honoring achievements that make people laugh, then think. Good achievements can also be odd, funny, and even absurd; So can bad achievements. A lot of good science gets attacked because of its absurdity. A lot of bad science gets revered despite its absurdity.

Re:IgNobels are a disservice to basic research (1)

interkin3tic (1469267) | about 2 years ago | (#41409635)

Think of it like a comedy roast. You don't have one for someone you genuinely don't like.

Re:IgNobels are a disservice to basic research (4, Informative)

Kidbro (80868) | about 2 years ago | (#41409135)

"The Ig Nobel Prizes honor achievements that first make people laugh, and then make them think. The prizes are intended to celebrate the unusual, honor the imaginative — and spur people's interest in science, medicine, and technology."

I think you have misunderstood the Ig Nobel Prize. It's not intended to mock the recipients. It's intended, partly, to reward basic (and sometimes not so basic) research into areas you'd otherwise forget might benefit from research.

"Are you ridiculing science?
No. We are honoring achievements that make people laugh, then think. Good achievements can also be odd, funny, and even absurd; So can bad achievements. A lot of good science gets attacked because of its absurdity. A lot of bad science gets revered despite its absurdity."

http://www.improbable.com/ig/ [improbable.com]

Re:IgNobels are a disservice to basic research (1)

Lincolnshire Poacher (1205798) | about 2 years ago | (#41409891)

Fairy nuff - thanks to you and the other posters for that link. I stand corrected.

Now can we inform the World's media thereof?

Re:IgNobels are a disservice to basic research (2)

jfengel (409917) | about 2 years ago | (#41413599)

Also take a look at just how many of them actually show up to receive their prizes. This isn't the Golden Raspberries, an award you hope to avoid. They really are laughing with them, rather than at them.

Colonoscopy explosions? (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41409079)

Does anyone else think that researching ways NOT to make someone explode when pumping gas in there during a colonoscopy might actually be a good thing? I don't really want to end up like one of Dig Dug's enemies, you know...

I completely agree with you (1)

portforward (313061) | about 2 years ago | (#41409347)

For what it is worth, not having a part of me explode during surgery sounds useful. The award of the report about the report about the report about the report does sound like a Monty Python joke though.

Re:Colonoscopy explosions? (1)

Dogtanian (588974) | about 2 years ago | (#41409379)

Does anyone else think that researching ways NOT to make someone explode when pumping gas in there during a colonoscopy might actually be a good thing? I don't really want to end up like one of Dig Dug's enemies, you know...

Eew... you mean Dig Dug was shoving his hose up the monsters' backsides? (*) No wonder I preferred Mr. Do...

(*) Upon proofreading this, the unintentional innuendo makes it sound even worse :-O

Re:Colonoscopy explosions? (1)

compro01 (777531) | about 2 years ago | (#41411647)

Yes. That's what the Ig Nobels are about. Research that on first glace seems ridiculous, but is actually very useful/important when you look closer.

Why coffee is so hard to carry without slopping?!? (2)

michael_rendier (2601249) | about 2 years ago | (#41409117)

I really need to see this research...

Re:Why coffee is so hard to carry without slopping (4, Informative)

chad_r (79875) | about 2 years ago | (#41409337)

Without reading the research, coffee is hard to carry while walking because the regular pace of your walking creates a resonant frequency that increases the sloshing until it spills over. If you take irregular steps or move your cup around in a random motion you can overcome this. However, you won't look cool doing either of these.

Re:Why coffee is so hard to carry without slopping (1)

Barryke (772876) | about 2 years ago | (#41409383)

I shall be moving my tea irregularly while walking. Also my investigation reveals gravity to be the root cause of all my problems. And for others. If we had no moon, woman wouldnt have such bad days each month.

Re:Why coffee is so hard to carry without slopping (1)

michael_rendier (2601249) | about 2 years ago | (#41409563)

I usually put a shot of whiskey in it to keep from spilling it...we from New Orleans do not waste alcohol...XD Also: Hail to Random Nature!

Re:Why coffee is so hard to carry without slopping (1)

Hillgiant (916436) | about 2 years ago | (#41411583)

If you take irregular steps or move your cup around in a random motion you can overcome this.

If you walk without rhythm, you wont attract the worm. Who knew it was mostly interested in spilled coffee.

Also, changing the amount of coffee in the container should change the mass of the arm/cup/coffee system and may move its natural frequency away from your natural stride. (but that is harder to fit into a sci-fi plot and/or techno beat)

Re:Why coffee is so hard to carry without slopping (1)

RespekMyAthorati (798091) | about 2 years ago | (#41413715)

Also, changing the amount of coffee in the container ...

Yes, empty cups seldom slosh.

Re:Why coffee is so hard to carry without slopping (1)

CannonballHead (842625) | about 2 years ago | (#41413289)

Indeed. I discovered the keep-mug-moving trick while at work. It works! But people did think I was a bit odd[er].

Re:Why coffee is so hard to carry without slopping (1)

nickersonm (1646933) | about 2 years ago | (#41544631)

If you move your cup up and down at the frequency of your pace, it will double the apparent frequency as seen by the mug. This is usually sufficient to prevent it from slopping.

The double laureate (1)

onyxruby (118189) | about 2 years ago | (#41409119)

I'm waiting for the day some wins an Ig Nobel and then goes on to win the Nobel prize as well. Such an accomplishment for humanity....

Re:The double laureate (5, Informative)

maswan (106561) | about 2 years ago | (#41409159)

You mean 2010? That's when Andre Geim got the Nobel prize in physics (for graphene), having previously gotten the Ig Nobel for levitating frogs.

Yeah I am waiting for that (1)

SmallFurryCreature (593017) | about 2 years ago | (#41409361)

Yeah, I am waiting for that event.

SmallFurryCreature, winner of the 2016 Nobel prize physics for his working time travel device.

Re:The double laureate (1)

onyxruby (118189) | about 2 years ago | (#41409543)

I didn't think it had happened, I have been enlightened. My day has now been made more cheery knowing that. What would you call that, a double Nobel?

Re:The double laureate (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41409677)

A Nobel Ig Nobel

Re:The double laureate (4, Funny)

khallow (566160) | about 2 years ago | (#41409447)

The challenge will be to get them for the same research.

Looking forward to the UK tour (2)

NCG_Mike (905098) | about 2 years ago | (#41409123)

They do a trip to the UK and come by HP Labs in Bristol, conveniently where I work. It's worth attending for a good set of laughs and the award winners take it all in good humour.

This place is really fucking boring anymore (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41409165)

*eom*

The Speech Jammer. (2)

Phoenix (2762) | about 2 years ago | (#41409189)

Actually I'd love to read up on the speech jammer. I've often had my cell phone do the very thing. Repeat my words with a slight delay and it is nearly impossible to hold a conversation while listening to myself a half second later.

Re:The Speech Jammer. (2)

plaukas pyragely (1630517) | about 2 years ago | (#41409779)

While playing in studio with stupid audio effects we once discovered that reversed delay* of ~1 second does jam speech quite well.

* More like instant reverse playback of 1 second recording

Re:The Speech Jammer. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41411045)

What the world really needs is an app which 1) identifies the POS over-produced generic pop song you're listening to and 2) jams it.

Re:The Speech Jammer. (1)

Anubis IV (1279820) | about 2 years ago | (#41411651)

Yeah, it's really interesting when you work with monitors and the like so that people can hear themselves. If it's near-instantaneous, they have no issue, but if you increase the delay just slightly, it can be extremely disorienting if you're unused to it. I sometimes record videos with live voiceover from myself and some folks on Skype (read: I make Let's Play [wikipedia.org] videos for YouTube), and because of how I have things set up, my own voice comes back through my headphones with a delay of about a second (it's due to a limitation in my setup, since this is just a minor hobby and not something I've invested heavily in). I've found that keeping one earpiece off my ear helps tremendously, otherwise I have a tendency to elongate my words in strange ways inadvertently, though I've gotten used enough to it that it's become far less of an issue than it was when I first started.

Ponytails (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41409325)

I love the way ponytails sway on female joggers. They're very distracting, swinging back and forth but not steady due to terrain, slight movements in the neck, etc.

Sway, sway, sway, FLIP.

ad exploding colonoscopy... (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41409491)

You know, exploding bladders during *cystoscopy* actually CAN happen... when you are using an electric HF sling to cut tissue in the bladder, you are also generating hydrogen and oxygen from electrolysis of the liquid that is used to distend the organ. The instruments produces an arc and can in unfortunate circumstances ignite the gas bubble that may form under the bladder's roof. Which can get nasty... *pop*

Re:ad exploding colonoscopy... (1)

K. S. Kyosuke (729550) | about 2 years ago | (#41410275)

At least it cauterizes the wound, doesn't it?

Re:ad exploding colonoscopy... (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41414113)

No shit Sherlock

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>