Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Dawn Spacecraft Finds Signs of Water On Vesta

Soulskill posted about 2 years ago | from the branson's-water-park dept.

NASA 33

ananyo writes "Vesta, the second-most-massive body in the asteroid belt, was thought to be bone dry. But NASA's Dawn spacecraft has found evidence that smaller, water-rich asteroids once implanted themselves in Vesta's surface. The water stays locked up in hydrated minerals until subsequent impacts create enough heat to melt the rock and release the water as a gas, leaving pitted vents in the surface. The discovery shows that yet another body in the inner Solar System has a water cycle."

cancel ×

33 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Behold! (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41412689)

The Space Jacuzzi!

Re:Behold! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41419197)

I meant a sauna, but whatever....

No water cycle... (3, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41412721)

Water cycle assumes that the water is reused... but nothing can return the water back to the asteroid after it evaporates... Only a supply of more water from other impacts is possible.

Re:No water cycle... (1, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41412791)

Exactly, you just need to include the entire universe and expand your time scale to match. Too bad most people don't want to live long enough though.

Re:No water cycle... (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41412897)

Other than, you know, gravity.

Re:No water cycle... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41412923)

Yeah, you know, the awesome gravitational pull of an entire asteroid.

Re:No water cycle... (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41414253)

Greater than the gravitational pull of your mother, and we all know SHE retains water.

Re:No water cycle... (1)

mk1004 (2488060) | about 2 years ago | (#41414311)

Depends upon whether or not the asteroid's gravitational field is stronger than external forces, such as photons, solar wind.

Re:No water cycle... (1)

Immerman (2627577) | about 2 years ago | (#41414345)

Considering that Mars' gravity is only barely sufficient, I'm going with an asteroid's is not. Even Earth's gravity would likely be insufficient if not for our magnetosphere shielding the atmosphere from most of the solar wind.

Re:No water cycle... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41510603)

I'd like to introduce you to asteroid 243 Ida [wikipedia.org] . It has a moon.

water water? (0, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41412749)

NASA is notorious for stating "water" interchangeably with the fluid state of gasses.
This is cause the wild cry of "WATER" fuels media cycles and helps to obtain and justify project funding,

Re:water water? (4, Informative)

Baloroth (2370816) | about 2 years ago | (#41413401)

NASA is notorious for stating "water" interchangeably with the fluid state of gasses. This is cause the wild cry of "WATER" fuels media cycles and helps to obtain and justify project funding,

First of all, you could comment with somewhat less flame-bait (it usually isn't NASA that does that but the media itself)... but yes, they found evidence of actual water. Not proof, mind you, since they didn't actually land and take a sample, but they found an excess of hydrogen and certain surface features that are characteristic of water. It's possible all that is caused by something besides water, but it's most likely water.

Re:water water? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41413799)

Caused by JPL, documentaries have been made, facts have been checked.

Re:water water? (1)

funwithBSD (245349) | about 2 years ago | (#41413409)

Would you prefer they say they found DHMO?

I mean, for public release, saying "water" makes more sense.

And anyway, water consumption for human use would be minimal, if it all. That water, unless it is deep underground, has been bombarded by cosmic rays for eons, it may be too radioactive in the form of Tritium to be safe.

Most likely, it will be used as fuel/reaction mass or as shielding from Cosmic Rays..
 

Re:water water? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41414485)

...it may be too radioactive in the form of Tritium to be safe.

Wow, that's heavy, dude!

Re:water water? (3, Informative)

mister_playboy (1474163) | about 2 years ago | (#41414547)

And anyway, water consumption for human use would be minimal, if it all. That water, unless it is deep underground, has been bombarded by cosmic rays for eons, it may be too radioactive in the form of Tritium to be safe.

Cosmic rays form tritium on Earth via high energy neutrons interacting with atmospheric nitrogen. Tritium could not be produced in such a manner on an asteroid and gaseous tritium would escape into space near instantly.

Tritium has a half life of less than 12.5 years, so it could not accumulate without constant production.

Re:water water? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41413937)

And what words are you interchanging, because otherwise I don't see how what you said makes any sense. Water means H2O... it is pretty simple and NASA doesn't use it to mean anything else.

Re:water water? (1)

Darth Snowshoe (1434515) | about 2 years ago | (#41414857)

"NASA is notorious for stating "water" interchangeably with the fluid state of gasses." -- for the claim of 'notorious' to be true, someone other than the vast masses of scientifically literate, engaged tea-party patriots in your own mind would have to know about it. Cite or GTFO.

Left orbit earlier this month (4, Informative)

ModernGeek (601932) | about 2 years ago | (#41412807)

The spacecraft left orbit earlier this month, so this is about recent analyzation of collected data, not something the spacecraft recently detected, as many might believe.

Re:Left orbit earlier this month (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41413785)

Dawn is about (in 2015) to get Ceres-ess. That is the really interesting asteroid / minor planet.

Since Ceres is so blurry I now safety state that it must be a Von Neumann probe

Re:Left orbit earlier this month (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41414909)

No, this is indeed using data from the DAWN spacecraft, using the Gamma Ray and Neutron Detector (GRaND). The original research paper is available here [sciencemag.org]

No shit (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41412971)

There used to be a planet there inhabited by water-based life-forms. Now they live here. Under our grounds. Up in our caves.

Of course there's water (2)

Enry (630) | about 2 years ago | (#41413183)

Nobody read Marooned Off Vesta [wikipedia.org] ? By tyhe end of the story and since it was written in 1938 I'd expect some of the water would have made it there....

Re:Of course there's water (1)

mcgrew (92797) | about 2 years ago | (#41413789)

I see you missed the story when the probe launched? I submitted that one, which was posted. The headline was "Marooned off Vesta" and I mentioned at the end of the summary that it was a nod to my favorite author.

Re:Of course there's water (1)

Enry (630) | about 2 years ago | (#41414049)

Well we got that going for us. Which is nice.

Re:Of course there's water (1)

WhiteDragon (4556) | about 2 years ago | (#41414333)

Nobody read Marooned Off Vesta [wikipedia.org] ? By tyhe end of the story and since it was written in 1938 I'd expect some of the water would have made it there....

One of the first "hard" sf stories I ever read.

Re:Of course there's water (1)

Ibiwan (763664) | about 2 years ago | (#41417459)

Gentlemen, I give you the century's supply of good old H2O we USED to have!

not news - solar system full of ice & snowball (2)

rubycodez (864176) | about 2 years ago | (#41413317)

the earth was provided with water by ice and snowballs: the comets. there are plenty of those flying around, not surprising there would be water anywhere and almost everywhere in the solar system. even mercury has ice in craters that never get exposed to sun

Re:not news - solar system full of ice & snowb (1)

Immerman (2627577) | about 2 years ago | (#41414593)

Yeah, but that was 4.5 billions of years ago, almost 1/3 the age of the entire universe. Suns have been born, lived their lives, and exploded to scatter their heavy elements across the cosmos since then. A lot can happen on those kinds of timescales, so it's not necessarily safe to assume that the solar system is still in the same state. Moreover ice sublimates at about -60C in a vacuum, so it isn't terribly stable in the inner solar system.

Re:not news - solar system full of ice & snowb (1)

Convector (897502) | about 2 years ago | (#41414747)

Comets. Icebergs of the sky. By jackknifing from one to the next at breakneck speed, we might get some kind of gravity boost ... or something.

Hurry before the red team gets there! (1)

Impy the Impiuos Imp (442658) | about 2 years ago | (#41414293)

Ding ding ding ding ding. Your robots have discovered water on a large asteroid with gravity. Move colony ship to colonize? Yes/No

Read it was Water on Vista (1)

vliktor (910475) | about 2 years ago | (#41414561)

I guess that Vista was just that bad...
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?