FSF Certifies First Device in "Respects Your Freedom" Program 79
Earlier this year, the Free Software Foundation announced a hardware endorsement campaign for hardware that respects the rights of its owner (no DRM, runs Free Software, support for open formats, no or freely licensed patents, etc.). Now, they've announced that the Lulzbot AO-100 3D Printer is the first device to pass certification and be endorsed by the FSF. Source code to both the hardware and software is available, naturally.
Re: (Score:2)
The wheel has come full circle. RMS started this due to his problem in getting a printer to work with his lab computers, and today, he has a 3D printer that follows this spec.
2d printers too? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes yes. I was looking for a new printer and when the offerings don't self-destruct* or quaff ink like mana potions, they restrict network printing to "licensed" computers (what if a few too many smartphone users visit? Will it get overwhelmed and forget my PC?) or generally bow to the Secret Service (but I guess that's mandatory now anyway so whatever). *sigh* I'll probably just hold my nose and buy the best one available.
As with video cards, I can't wait for a "third" group to come along and kick some
Re: (Score:2)
That would be awesome and certainly could go a long way towards inks that aren't made out of plastic (creating tons of waste) and don't have a ridiculous cost per ounce.
Re: (Score:2)
Xerox Phaser 8560 MFP.
Have 2 in our office and I love em.
Solid Ink "Pucks". No Plastic to surround em. The puck is the ink.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
It needs to start somewhere. If they start certifying desktops, laptops, and smartphones, I'll probably start wih those when I'm shopping.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:So what? (Score:5, Insightful)
The world is awash with evil fuckers who, rather than trying to win you over with solid products and services, will expend their effort and money on bribes, advertising, patent warchests, takeovers and suchlike with the sole goal of manipulating, extorting, deceiving and straitjacketing you, not just to get the money you have now, but an ever increasing tithe, in perpetuity. Against this backdrop, a small organisation starts a modest initiative to help lift the veil from these practices to help you, and you... mock them for it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Maybe if they focused more on issues that actually mattered and stopped acting like god damn babies people would take them seriously. Right now they're trying to attack every non-free thing at once, flagging everyone who doesn't suck RMS' dick and releases every line of code ever written under the GPL as evil fuckers who should basically go die just because they disagree with the FSF philosophy.
Being pragmatic about the GPL is what accomplishes things. FSF just leads the example of what not to do, except so
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe if they focused more on issues that actually mattered and stopped acting like god damn babies people would take them seriously. Right now they're trying to attack every non-free thing at once, flagging everyone who doesn't suck RMS' dick and releases every line of code ever written under the GPL as evil fuckers who should basically go die just because they disagree with the FSF philosophy.
Being pragmatic about the GPL is what accomplishes things. FSF just leads the example of what not to do, except sometimes it occasionally works. The other times, the rest of the community does the real work by looking at things with a practical approach rather than asslicking inducing religiousness.
I think that you need to consider them in context:
Specifically, it is the positions of the 'extremists' that help define the range that counts as 'pragmatic'. If you only have extremists on one side, your 'pragmatic' window drifts toward them one half-step at a time; because compromising and following the past of least effort is what 'pragmatists' tend to do. Extremists get less done, because there aren't as many of them; but their presence has a strong effect on what counts as 'moderate' opinion(and, pleas
Re: (Score:3)
Or in other words:
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world. The unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man." --George Bernard Shaw
Re: (Score:1)
Welcome to Capitalism, if you don't like it you're welcome to move to North Korea.
Thanks, but I'd rather stay in Europe... We're not perfect but at least we see a middle ground between being either communist extremists or free market extremists and while far from perfect we do have regulations controlling what business do, and even our right wing nuts are (mostly) not whackjobs enough to suggest that unregulated market would do us better - hell, we just need to look across the pond to see it's not the way to go, yet you yanks just push towards that goal...
We mock the FSF because we respect private property, they're against the spirit of copyright ("copyleft" lol, never heard so much Orwellian Communist double-speak in all my life) and they're against software patents, which reward innovators and punish freeloaders (like the loonie-leftist hippies denizens of this Web site).
Yeah, you just keep babbling...
Re: (Score:1)
The world is awash with evil fuckers who, rather than trying to win you over with solid products and services, will expend their effort and money on bribes, advertising, patent warchests, takeovers and suchlike with the sole goal of manipulating, extorting, deceiving and straitjacketing you, not just to get the money you have now, but an ever increasing tithe, in perpetuity.
What does that have to do with open source software and open source hardware? Open-source companies can still "expend their effort and money on bribes, advertising, patent warchests, takeovers and suchlike with the sole goal of manipulating, extorting, deceiving and straitjacketing you". You can't seriously believe open-source companies are limited from things like "bribes and advertising" by the FSF's bullet points. At this point, you're just going hyperbolic to try to make everyone agree with you.
Against this backdrop, a small organisation starts a modest initiative to help lift the veil from these practices to help you, and you... mock them for it.
My vi
Re: (Score:2)
-- What does that have to do with open source software and open source hardware?
(I'm not sure I've understood this question, as I'd assume the issues with closed software and hardware are familiar to anyone who reads slashdot.) Many of the companies that produce hardware and software do so in a way that is deliberately designed to work against you. Off the top of my head... CarrierIQ springs to mind. Apple's walled garden. Vendor lock-in. Standards bait-and-switch. Patent submarines and trolls. Tivoisation.
Re: (Score:2)
So inspiring it see such an impassioned defence of Lulzbot by pr0nbot. :-(
I think its time I reported to the Sleepshop. I don't much like this new world.
Re: (Score:1)
He said the FSF, not the free software movement. Stop assuming that doing it the RMS way is the only way to do things. Then again, you're one of those idiots who assume that if someone disagrees with them, they're obviously a human drone incapable of rational thought. Truth is, you're the one incapable of it by acting that way and feeling smug over everyone else.
Hopefully there's more people out there who value freedom AND common sense AND don't obsess over it as much as RMS.
Re: (Score:1)
Translation: Someone dared to question my religious organization so I must attack and demean them. Yes, I favor pragmatism over religiosity when it comes to computing. I'll take Linus any day over Richard 'Toejam' Stallman. He gets results without the cultish attitude.
Not for sale to the Cuba, Iran, Sudan, Syria... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know if the project has any legal obligation to actually come out and say that; but those are just US export restrictions, not the project team's choice whether they want that to be there or not.
Communist software (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"the Cuba"?
Is that like "the Iraq, and such"?
Re: (Score:1)
Desperate claim for relevancy (Score:3)
This is nothing more than an attempt to cash in on the Makerbot closed-hardware closed-source fiasco.
You know, all the people who were alllllllll about open hardware / open source? Until people started making clones of their sacred cow, the makerbot 3D printer?
You know, the same people who then got absolutely ripshit when Makerbot went closed-source?
It's a desperate attempt by the FSF to remain relevant when the world has largely moved on and ignored them...
Re: (Score:2)
What's with all the capitalist venom that stories like this bring out? It's scary how religiously these trolls espouse the dogma and supposed supreme goodness of an ownership society. They're very noisy, as if they're insecure. In a dog eat dog world, they think they can be, if not the top dogs, at least the plutocrats' poodles, rather than the next item on the menu. They seem to think if they put on a good enough act of devotion to these poisonous principles, they will not be skewered and roasted over
Re: (Score:2)
Unluckily it cannot be sold to EU (Score:2)
Remember, the "AO-100" is still a printer, just like any (normal) printer. Apple knows it very well, now.
The iPhone is like any other phone as far as the warranty is concerned.
Re: (Score:2)
For small values of free... (Score:3)
From the website: Not for sale to the Cuba, Iran, Sudan, Syria, or North Korea.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Those are restrictions imposed by a violent third-party gang of thugs.
Re: (Score:2)
well.. don't those same restrictions apply to screwdrivers sold in USA?
Re: (Score:2)
well.. don't those same restrictions apply to screwdrivers sold in USA?
Victory screwdrivers?
:)
Wait, my freedom? (Score:1)
How would an electronic device, that is completely voluntary to own, infringe upon my freedom?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Also, many inkjet printers won't print money :-D . If you try, their drivers will point you to a site where you can download authorized fac-simile images instead.
Re: (Score:2)
"Sorry, Dave, i can't save the recording you just did with your iphone9: there is a dr who episode on the tv behind you that triggers the DRM agent."
But this is the future. The now is the friggin android phone which doesn't give me root without voiding the warranty, so a 800mhz cpu can't do the things i could do with a 166mhz PC.
Strange comment from a low UID.
Re: (Score:2)
How would an electronic device, that is completely voluntary to own, infringe upon my freedom?
It depends upon the language you use, it's not going to be taking away any freedoms (or "infringe" upon them) that you already had but it may not grant you particular freedoms. Moreover you may be willing to accept not being granted certain freedoms when using certain products - we all do this - for example when posting on this site you don't have the freedom to examine the source code of all software running on all servers through which you transmit data, this could be misconstrued as an infringement of yo
AC Trolling, part 27... (Score:1)
Since this seems to be the trend, I'll add to the AC trolling.
Whether you agree with RMS or not, it is impossible to deny the signficance of the GPL and the GNU ecosystem he created. Just because you don't like bearded hippies who don't compromise their integrity doesn't make them insignificant. Obviously no one likes being told that someone else makes a moral choice that one doesn't, because folks don't think of themselves as immoral. That's why omnivores hate on vegans. That's why folks think religious nu
Re: (Score:1)
Be glad that there are people of integrity in our world who don't let pragmatism get in the way of their belief system.
Why should I be glad about people who can never admit they might be wrong about something. Blind devotion to anything is not a good thing. The people who are constantly questioning their belief systems and changing their minds when they are wrong are the people who we should be glad to have. The world doesn't need more dogmatists.
Awesome! More products please (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm looking at you System76 and ZaReason. One of FSF requirements in this program is a free BIOS, and we have a good one in CoreBoot (and it can make boot times faster). Worried about Secure/Restricted Boot? Get a laptop with a free bios, boot what you want.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
The electronics are a RAMPS shield on a standard Arduino. The plastic parts are indeed printed by other 3d printers in the Lulzbot bot farm. So depending on your definition of "make" it can indeed make more 3D printers. The frame is based in large part on the MendelMax design. All of this is open source and available on the reprap.org site, and other related sites.
Kudos to the Lulzbot team.
More of this please (Score:3)
I want to see a PC (that can run a full Linux distro) that has this FSF stamp.
Or even just the bits that go into one (motherboard, CPU, GPU, RAM etc)
Thanks! (Score:2)
Jeff Moe here, founder of Aleph Objects, Inc. maker of the LulzBot 3D printer. Note this is a printer which makes *objects*, not a printer that prints on paper.
I haven't spent much time on /. recently. I appreciate the post and the positive comments from many of you. The others, not so much. ;) I typically use the nick "jebba", but this account got set up with "yeb" for some reason, long forgot.
I am a long time supporter of free software, open culture, open publishing, etc. I am not a communist, as you can
certified android phone (Score:2)
I'd pay top dollar for a quality Android phone with RYF certification. Just sayin'...
NASA could really use these. (Score:1)