Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

How To Hug a Chicken Via the Internet

timothy posted about 2 years ago | from the anything-between-consenting-adult-beings dept.

The Internet 96

the_newsbeagle writes "Adrian Cheok, a professor of electrical engineering in Japan, wants to invent a "multisensory Internet" that will transmit not just information, but also experiences. To usher in this new age, he started by building a haptic system that enabled him to send a hug to a chicken via the Internet. Next came the 'huggy pajama' project, which allowed distant parents to send their kid a goodnight squeeze. Lately he's begun working on sending a taste over the internet with his 'digital lollypop' project."

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Chicken Hugging (5, Funny)

JediPhreaK (1309461) | about 2 years ago | (#41786253)

Really? Hug a Chicken? Come on it's called Choking your chicken, the Internet is a weird place.

Re:Chicken Hugging (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786343)

At least it's not called spanking your python.

Re:Chicken Hugging (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786393)

At least it's not Yodeling your Chicken...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yO7MWuJ7zLA [youtube.com]

Re:Chicken Hugging (1)

issicus (2031176) | about 2 years ago | (#41786577)

the chicken lover?

Re:Chicken Hugging (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786945)

His last name is Cheok!

Re:Chicken Hugging (1, Informative)

ls671 (1122017) | about 2 years ago | (#41787749)

For the ducks and chickens I raise, I put their necks on a log and then I use an ax. One can also twist the necks while hunting for example and when no log and ax are handy. I feel the ax is better, hanging is a big no no in my book ;-)

P.S. I know one hangs them (by the feet) for the meat to age and the blood to drain.

Re:Chicken Hugging (1)

distilate (1037896) | about 2 years ago | (#41787781)

Really? Hug a Chicken? Come on it's called Choking your chicken, the Internet is a weird place.

"Kevin bloody Wilson" said to be ecstatic about the possibility of F***ing a chicken over the internet!

Re:Chicken Hugging (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41787797)

As Cee-Lo Green put it: Leave Scootaloo alone! [youtube.com]

Relevant webcomic (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786259)

A Softer World [asofterworld.com]

Suspicious (4, Funny)

Grey Ninja (739021) | about 2 years ago | (#41786261)

So he made a device where you can hug a cock over the internet... now he wants to allow you to taste a cock? Count me out.

Re:Suspicious (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786357)

Agreed. I prefer a women to do these things to me in person.

The more things change (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786607)

The more things change, the the more things stay the same [welookdoyou.com] . Note, the device described in the link is, AFAIK, fictional and requires a tower PC with a full sized bay. Try that with a tablet, unless you're literally a pencil dick. Actually, you can't even install new hardware in a tablet, so scratch that altogether... although you gotta wonder what people are going to do with touch interfaces, and whether or not they'll come out with a touch screen that's flexible and sensitive to heat, dampness, and... I feel sick now...

Re:The more things change (1)

Hartree (191324) | about 2 years ago | (#41786675)

I'm very glad I don't have to write that interface spec...

Re:The more things change (1)

Austerity Empowers (669817) | about 2 years ago | (#41786985)

You think you have it bad, imagine the geeksquad call.

Re:The more things change (1)

hairyfeet (841228) | about 2 years ago | (#41790457)

What interface? Nobody seen "strange days" around here? The future will simply bypass all the bullshit and send the simulation directly into your brain. Talk about an easy way to keep the masses passive! They could live in the worst rat hole and be happy as clams, as long as they could plug in at the end of the day.

"If real is what you can feel, smell, taste and see, then 'real' is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain" and THAT will be the future, only it won't be brought by some enslaving machines, it'll be brought by megacorps who'll make a fricking killing. We are now just starting to figure this stuff out, glasses that let the blind see, sounds broadcast to the brain, but you can bet your last dollar they WILL figure out how to just send the signals directly to your brain, then no "interface" needed. Plug in, tune out.

Re:The more things change (1)

kdemetter (965669) | about 2 years ago | (#41788033)

"Ready for operation. Click to enlarge" . :-)

Re:The more things change (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41792897)

meh, if the IOS device market is any indication, it will only be a matter of time till the IJack is built. comes in pitcher and catcher varieties (dildo for straight women/ gay men, fleshlightesque device for straight men/ lesbians). Make the soft bits detachable and dishwasher safe and the Sex deprived and/or kinky will buy it in droves.

IJack, only the finest in teledildonics.

Re:Suspicious (4, Funny)

Ukab the Great (87152) | about 2 years ago | (#41786683)

I hear that cock tastes like chicken.

Re:Suspicious (1)

couchslug (175151) | about 2 years ago | (#41792227)

"I hear that cock tastes like chicken."

Take one of each. Skin (plucking is too much work) and de-head them, then fry in the same pan for comparison.

Post results!

Re:Suspicious (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41787043)

Maybe it's for hugging chicks instead!

Re:Suspicious (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41787997)

The meme that porn drives advances in tech has been sort of disproved recently, but if it's one thech that's going to get the backing of the porn people...

Digital Lollipop (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786283)

Cheok has a “digital lollipop” in the works that electrically and thermally stimulates the tongue to produce basic flavors—bitter, sour, salty, sweet. He dreams of a system that would let friends in Paris send you a taste of their wine over the Internet.

Yes... their 'wine'...

He should just call it the lolicon lollipop already.

Re:Digital Lollipop (5, Funny)

wierd_w (1375923) | about 2 years ago | (#41786843)

I'm just waiting for such a technology as that lollipop to actually take off, so I can read about hackers replacing the digital data for the flavor information with that harvested from a turd.

That's some prankstering hacking I would roffle reading.

Re:Digital Lollipop (1)

wisty (1335733) | about 2 years ago | (#41787589)

Note - don't leech a hacker's wifi if you're going to be downloading taste or smell files.

Sensory Spam Re:Digital Lollipop (1)

girlinatrainingbra (2738457) | about 2 years ago | (#41787675)

Consider the crazy spam we get now with just textual and visual and auditory messages. Can you imagine the kind of crap that could be sent with olfactory, taste, and touch senses added to that?

.

``My god, it's made up of sensory stimuli!''

.

And what craziness would ensue for those who has cross-sensory transference known as synesthesia. [wikipedia.org]

People with synesthesia have abnormal but recurring cross-sensory stimulus associations, such as the letter L being associated with the color pink, or a certain musical note having a particular flavor associated with it. It's not the color of noise [wikipedia.org] electrical engineers and audio people talk about with white noise or pink noise, but colorful noise as in noise inciting color stimuli centers in the brain. Muy cool. But I would hate to receive cross sensory spam.

.

And I'm thinking that there are some science fiction stories that talk about attack advertisements that sneak up on you. Perhaps Philip K Dick, but a girlfriend says perhaps Stainless Steel Rat [wikipedia.org] books by Harry Harrison [wikipedia.org] , instead. Anyone know for sure?

Re:Digital Lollipop (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41788083)

You've already SEEN it, but after waiting impatiently for more than ten years, you'll finally get the chance to learn what goatse TASTES like!

Chicken Hugging (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786295)

Y'know, make all the genital slang references you want, but at the end of the day, this is about hugging chickens. And chickens are cute-looking fluffy creatures that look like they need a hug. And this allows you to do so without getting scratched up or pecked!

Re:Chicken Hugging (1)

donscarletti (569232) | about 2 years ago | (#41786885)

Chickens, when hugged, go into a defensive posture, crouching low, head down, wings slightly hunched. They generally will not peck adult humans.

In retrospect, she could have mistaken me for a cockerel trying to mount her and gone into a mating position, which is roughly the same posture.

Re:Chicken Hugging (1)

Randle_Revar (229304) | about 2 years ago | (#41787231)

Raise them from chicks and they make great pets and will not have a problem with hugs. Some will even purr!
There are chicken diapers so your chicken can stay in the house.

Re:Chicken Hugging (1)

Windwraith (932426) | about 2 years ago | (#41789535)

Many birds can be "potty trained" like dogs and cats, but people usually doesn't have the same patience than with mammals when it comes to training avian pets, for some reason.

Time to buy porn industry stock (1)

PensivePeter (1104071) | about 2 years ago | (#41786301)

...just think about the possibilities

Re:Time to buy porn industry stock (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41787225)

Well,teledildonics is hardly a new concept...

Re:Time to buy porn industry stock (1)

fatphil (181876) | about 2 years ago | (#41788191)

But teledildonics isn't new. I'm not sure he's breaking any new ground with his ideas.

Next up: Choking (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786305)

Next up: Choking

I have 2 backyard chickens (4, Informative)

kawabago (551139) | about 2 years ago | (#41786369)

i can just imagine the commotion a mechanical monster lumbering into the run to give them a hug. I wouldn't have eggs for days!

Re:I have 2 backyard chickens (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786695)

Wait, is "chicken" still a euphemism?

Re:I have 2 backyard chickens (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41787003)

They're not here to serve you anyway, punk ass bitch.

Re:I have 2 backyard chickens (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41788463)

That's right, they're here to live as along as allow them, to make eggs, before I cut their head off, pluck the feathers, remove the guts, and cook the meat.

Re:I have 2 backyard chickens (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41789677)

Wow. You have an odd way of displaying your frustrations over being a common faggot dick smoker. Not to mention that your English sucks too.

YES (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786385)

This is going to take techno chicken yodeling to a whole new level.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yO7MWuJ7zLA [youtube.com]

no. just... no. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786387)

and let this be a lesson to you.

Look at what nuking japan did to them!

Tremendous implications for telemedicine (5, Interesting)

Andy Prough (2730467) | about 2 years ago | (#41786389)

True remote physical examinations, with the patient and physician both feeling and responding to the tactile interaction. This could be huge - especially in terms of extreme remote medicine, such as handling astronaut-patients on lengthy missions to Mars or the asteroid belt.

Re:Tremendous implications for telemedicine (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786603)

I agree that it is big, but I don't think that this would be applicable to astronauts that are on their way to mars because of the latency involved.

captcha: funerals

Re:Tremendous implications for telemedicine (-1)

Andy Prough (2730467) | about 2 years ago | (#41786693)

I was thinking about that. I think what would happen is you would want to drop probes every so often on the way to Mars or the asteroid belt that would act as a communication link. Don't know how frequently spaced they would have to be, or what orbit around the sun in order to keep them aligned. But, that would also help with all other communication with the ship and the mission, and allow the establishment of permanent bases.

Re:Tremendous implications for telemedicine (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41787257)

Wouldn't fix the latency problem, because it can't be solved without changing orbits.

Distance from Earth to Mars (right now) = 3.052 * 10^8 km
Speed of light in vacuum =299792 km/s
Distance / c = 16minutes, 58.12 seconds

Space is freaking huge.

Re:Tremendous implications for telemedicine (3, Informative)

travbrad (622986) | about 2 years ago | (#41786665)

I could see it working on earth, but surely the latency would make it impossible for a physician on earth to tactility interact with a patient on Mars. At best Mars is about 3 light minutes away from earth, and it can be as far as 20+ light minutes away. 100-200ms is enough to throw off online gamers, so I imagine 600,000ms would be a bit too much for a doctor to work with.

Re:Tremendous implications for telemedicine (1)

Andy Prough (2730467) | about 2 years ago | (#41786833)

You know, the latency may not really matter. Just train the doctors to wait three minutes to get the tactile response from Mars - so if the physician feels your throat or abdomen for abnormal swelling, the physician has a timer giving an alert as to when to look for the tactile response.

Re:Tremendous implications for telemedicine (1)

MacGyver2210 (1053110) | about 2 years ago | (#41787705)

Clearly you're forgetting about the data wrapper for the Ansible system...

The Hard Part (2)

nthitz (840462) | about 2 years ago | (#41786427)

To me it seems simulating the sense, either touch, taste, or anything else that is the hard part. Sending the data over the net seems pretty straightforward a capable connection.

Um... Ok... (0)

Greyfox (87712) | about 2 years ago | (#41786457)

There's nothing about this story that doesn't trigger my "Don't make eye contact and back away slowly" reflex. Nothing at all.

mod dmoWn (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786485)

megs of ram runs Is the worst off market. therefore be in a scene and been looking for! Was at the same are inherently hot on the heels of contributed code THE MUNDANE CHORES very sick and its The official GAY is dying. Fact: hapless *BSD Bei8g GAY NIGGERS. guest and never get The Cathedral those uber-asshole dying' crowd - Knows for sure what our cause. Gay Core team. They contaminated while to yet another

Re:mod dmoWn (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41787051)

Cool story.

Translation: Choke the Chicken (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786501)

Turning Japanese? I really think so! I think I'm ...

Japan is weird, did you know that? (4, Insightful)

Nimey (114278) | about 2 years ago | (#41786553)

It's an important step forward, but only in Japan would hugging a chicken be an intermediate step.

Re:Japan is weird, did you know that? (5, Informative)

KramberryKoncerto (2552046) | about 2 years ago | (#41786883)

It's actually because of the researcher's Australian upbringing. Quoted from here [ieee.org] :

Growing up in Adelaide, Australia, Cheok had often played with the chickens kept by his grandfather, so he decided to focus on poultry (rule one). He built haptic jackets for the chickens himself (rule two), embedding them with vibrating elements. Tinkering taught him just how difficult it is to produce a gentle, humanlike touch. “The system develops as you build it,” Cheok says. “I see research as iterative—you’re learning from what you’re making.”

Japanese indirectness... (1)

openfrog (897716) | about 2 years ago | (#41789105)

It's an important step forward, but only in Japan would hugging a chicken be an intermediate step.

You have to take account of the proverbial Japanese indirectness. What the professor wants to demonstrate becomes clearer when you think of the following distinction: eroticism is when you use a feather; pornography is when you use to whole chicken.

What's with the cutesy stuff? (4, Insightful)

thegarbz (1787294) | about 2 years ago | (#41786595)

Sending hugs over the internet has little practical purposes.

On the other hand you could solve a lot of the worlds problems if we could punch people in the face over the internet.

Re:What's with the cutesy stuff? (1)

antdude (79039) | about 2 years ago | (#41786871)

How about punching a chicken? :D

Re:What's with the cutesy stuff? (1)

Windwraith (932426) | about 2 years ago | (#41789285)

But chickens are kind of cute, why would you punch a chicken without the chicken doing something evil to you, like kidnapping your children or pecking you in the eye? I'd rather hug them.

Re:What's with the cutesy stuff? (1)

antdude (79039) | about 2 years ago | (#41789389)

So you don't eat cooked chickens? ;) That's OK, I have a chicken. I wouldn't kill and eat him unless I had no food. >:)

Re:What's with the cutesy stuff? (1)

Windwraith (932426) | about 2 years ago | (#41789495)

Actually, I don't eat poultry. I happen to be a bird enthusiast since I was a little kid, used to raise chicks and that kind of thing. For me birds are like cats for everyone else. (I also happen to hate cats, their "I own my owner" attitude kills any semblance of cuteness they might have).

Re:What's with the cutesy stuff? (1)

antdude (79039) | about 2 years ago | (#41789633)

Ah cool. So you eat cats then? [grin]

Re:What's with the cutesy stuff? (2)

kerohazel (913211) | about 2 years ago | (#41787089)

Forget punching, we need to go straight to stabbing.

Re:What's with the cutesy stuff? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41787773)

4chan would actually become good again. MY GOD.

Re:What's with the cutesy stuff? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41787805)

Why would you purchase and install in your home a machine to let people on the internet punch you?
You know what, never mind... I really don't need to know that much about you.

Re:What's with the cutesy stuff? (1)

ls671 (1122017) | about 2 years ago | (#41788103)

I could swear I already saw that on the net but it must have been those missile launchers I remembered about:

http://www.usbgeek.com/collections/gadgets/products/usb-wireless-missile-launcher [usbgeek.com]

http://www.usbgeek.com/collections/gadgets/products/usb-thunder-missile-launcher [usbgeek.com]

Uhm no thanks.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786701)

I can't imagine hooking this up with Chatroulette....

H.E.A.V.E.N. (4, Funny)

GrpA (691294) | about 2 years ago | (#41786729)

Haptically Enhanced Advanced Virtual Environment Network

H.E.A.V.E.N.

Nice to see some of this technology starting to progress.

GrpA.

Re:H.E.A.V.E.N. (2)

MITguy21 (1248040) | about 2 years ago | (#41786809)

Haptically Enhanced Advanced Virtual Environment Network

H.E.A.V.E.N.

aka teledildonics -- a name I remember from the 1980's at MIT Media Lab.

Re:H.E.A.V.E.N. (1)

19thNervousBreakdown (768619) | about 2 years ago | (#41786943)

Wake me up with Jackie Treehorn finally gets his Advanced Teledildonics project going.

How to "Hug" a Chicken Via the Internet. (0)

VortexCortex (1117377) | about 2 years ago | (#41786745)

^-- Scare-quotes added for your cyber-chicken-choking pleasure.

hug panties (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786749)

this guy just wants to put a backdoor in next decade's "hug panties" software so he can digitally molest women. japanese people are all sick and crazy

MMMMM....hhhnnnngggghhh....yeah.... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786805)

"Digital Lolipop..." Yeah, baby, lick it. You like that "lolipop"

That sounds hot. What could go wrong?

On the internet.. (4, Funny)

Megahard (1053072) | about 2 years ago | (#41786817)

nobody knows you're a chicken.

Re:On the internet.. (1)

MacGyver2210 (1053110) | about 2 years ago | (#41787709)

Nobody.

moD d0wn (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786827)

big deal. Death 6ive BSD credit been sitting here

Why a chicken? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786841)

Why hug a chicken? Surely they dislike being hugged?

Serious question.

Re:Why a chicken? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786925)

I am interested too. Cats, dogs, may be. But chicken, why o why?

Re:Why a chicken? (1)

Austerity Empowers (669817) | about 2 years ago | (#41786993)

She said she wanted more foreplay.

Re:Why a chicken? (1)

couchslug (175151) | about 2 years ago | (#41792247)

They respond favorably to holding, petting, etc. Hugging is too much as they are lightly built.

(I have backyard chickens.)

Hi (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786903)

Very interesting,http://tusnoticiasdeactualidad.blogspot.com/

Failure (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41786949)

How many chicken were squeezed to death before he got the machine working?

Re:Failure (1)

SternisheFan (2529412) | about 2 years ago | (#41791409)

How many chicken were squeezed to death before he got the machine working?

Mistakes were made...

Caution! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41787135)

... sending a taste over the internet with his 'digital lollypop' /quote>

Won't someone think of the children ... and the diabetics.

Temple Grandin version (2)

macraig (621737) | about 2 years ago | (#41787315)

I want to see Temple Grandin's version of these remote hug machines.

You lick my lollypop I'll hug your chicken. (1)

locopuyo (1433631) | about 2 years ago | (#41787329)

Isn't that a hip hop song?

Poor nerds... (1)

WGFCrafty (1062506) | about 2 years ago | (#41787405)

There unfortunately are a lot [slashdot.org] of lonely nerds who need a hug, even if there is no one there. Seems they just want an actual human to initiate the hugtastic ordeal.

This is wrong on so many levels (2)

jamrock (863246) | about 2 years ago | (#41787617)

"Hug a chicken"? "Huggy pajamas"? "Digital lollipop"?

I've read some disturbing things on Slashdot, but this turns it up to eleven.

Waxing the Dolphin vie the Intertubes (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41788411)

"Hugging a chicken" is code talk I've never heard before

Plagiarised? (2)

felixrising (1135205) | about 2 years ago | (#41791547)

A friend, Dr Florian "Floyd" Mueller [rmit.net.au] of RMIT University here in Melbourne, Australia also published a paper on a project called "Hug over a distance" [lmgtfy.com] back in early 2005... The projects look surprisingly similar... Floyd heads up the Exertion Games Lab [exertiongameslab.org] which does a lot of similar "over a distance" [exertioninterfaces.com] Internet enabled interactions.

Re:Plagiarised? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41816803)

I found previous published papers of Adrian Cheok, actually he started the poultry internet around 2002 and the Huggy Pajama around 2003. Similar inventions and research often appear around the same time.

Blow (on) someone over IP (1)

TheSync (5291) | about 2 years ago | (#41795115)

Breath over IP [makezine.com] was done several years ago.

OK for Muuslims. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41799853)

According to the Ayatolla it is OK to fuck a chicken, provided that you dont then sell it in your village.

enhanced experience (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41799863)

This shoulf make cyber sex more fun.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?