Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Boring Conference Still Vows: We Will Not Rock You

timothy posted about a year and a half ago | from the boring-like-good-birth-control dept.

It's funny.  Laugh. 42

An anonymous reader writes "The Boring 2012 Conference, the celebration of unexciting things served with dry British humor, now belongs to the wastepaper basket of history. Correspondents at the third annual London conference report that speakers covered a range of such dull topics as supermarket self-service checkouts; a photographic survey of results produced by breakfast toasters; a web site tracking the physical heights of celebrities; and the use of Google Maps to the chart the location of IBM cash registers around London." Funny thing is, the talks described actually sound fascinating.

cancel ×

42 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Big fan of irony here (1)

gagol (583737) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160405)

Would have loved to attend before it shut down. Anyone did? If so, how was it?

Re:Big fan of irony here (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42160459)

Boring?

Re:Big fan of irony here (1)

K. S. Kyosuke (729550) | about a year and a half ago | (#42161755)

Boring?

Was there a presentation on tungsten-carbide drills? I love tungsten-carbide drills.

Re:Big fan of irony here (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42169453)

Vernon Dursley would LOVE to hear from YOU. (book 1, chap 1, para 1)

" the talks described actually sound fascinating" (1)

G3ckoG33k (647276) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160427)

"Funny thing is, the talks described actually sound fascinating".

How would you know that?

Re:" the talks described actually sound fascinatin (4, Insightful)

vlm (69642) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160473)

"Funny thing is, the talks described actually sound fascinating".

How would you know that?

They sound like extremely stereotypical technology demonstrators. So I wanna show off my new statistical analysis / HBASE backend /AJAX presentation / wiimote controlled scala classes, but I've got no data at work that's non-proprietary to share with the world, so you get ... um ... a database of movie star height, yeah thats it.. True, they could be "ancient" technology that's not really new anymore, or they could be poorly done demonstrations, but optimistically they could be pretty interesting. Or at least good for a laugh (ha ha ha I was doing that back in 2008, etc)

Re:" the talks described actually sound fascinatin (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42161127)

I think you're missing the point (disclaimer: I did not attend). The talks were on subjects that were absurdly mundane, and yet the speakers managed to become engrossed in the details and (in the successful talks) were able to convey that interest to the audience, which was willing to suspend judgement. And everyone enjoying a good laugh on themselves for sitting patiently through such "boring" presentations. It's like being roped into a board game at a party which sounds really lame, and ending up getting taken in by the strategy and turns of fate.

Re:" the talks described actually sound fascinatin (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42160485)

"Funny thing is, the talks described actually sound fascinating".

How would you know that?

It's a statement of prsonal opinion based on the descriptions provided. How could he not know his own reaction?

Re:" the talks described actually sound fascinatin (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42160517)

"How could he not know his own reaction?"

We don't know that. How would you?

misread (4, Funny)

ipquickly (1562169) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160441)

I accidentally misread "a photographic survey" as "pornographic survey" and for a fraction of a second this article became more interesting.
Then I re-read it and the feeling subsided.

Re:misread (1)

khallow (566160) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160845)

Someone please kill that klaxon before my ears bleed. Disaster has been adverted.

Re:misread (1)

bosef1 (208943) | about a year and a half ago | (#42161005)

Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

Premature (1)

ve3oat (884827) | about a year and a half ago | (#42161073)

... for a fraction of a second this article became more interesting. Then I re-read it and the feeling subsided.

Ha!! Premature satisfaction!

Re:Premature (1)

chromas (1085949) | about a year and a half ago | (#42161733)

Premature infatuation; rhymes better.

Wait until you read (3, Funny)

Neil_Brown (1568845) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160453)

my 677 page summary of proceedings — it's in point 8 Times New Roman, three columns to the A5 page.

Re:Wait until you read (4, Funny)

pr0nbot (313417) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160515)

I invite you to submit it to the prestigious Journal of Universal Rejection [universalrejection.org] for peer review.

Re:Wait until you read (1)

Spinalcold (955025) | about a year and a half ago | (#42161723)

Or you can read Leviticus

Yawn! (1)

bdwoolman (561635) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160457)

Nothing to see here.

Slate.com? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42160469)

Another one from slate.com?

The other news were about the maze..

If news was plural it would have an apo'strophe (1)

Hognoxious (631665) | about a year and a half ago | (#42162139)

The other news were

News are singular. Or possibly uncountable, which is close enough for the likes of you.

If an exploit is found on IBM cash registers . . . (2)

PolygamousRanchKid (1290638) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160475)

. . . that location information of them might be useful . . . and profitable.

Wikipedia. (1)

Seumas (6865) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160487)

Why the fuck doesn't Wikipedia include the heights of celebrities? Afraid of the backlash when the world realizes how short all the men are?

Re:Wikipedia. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42160829)

Does it include the weight of female celebrities?

I want my money back! (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42160533)

It was interesting.

Wait, it wasn't an ichnology conference? (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42160535)

These guys [wiley.com] should have presented their paper at it.

Slashdot - news for imbecilles (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42160613)

idle is killing /. next probably come fart jokes, facebook accounts and show wrestling...

for fucks sake, stop

Re:Slashdot - news for imbecilles (1)

aix tom (902140) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160641)

Now show farting and wrestling jokes on the other hand .......

Re:Slashdot - news for imbecilles (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42170005)

.... hilarity ensues. But somehow, I can't find OW MY BALLS! on TV... maybe we just need to wait a few more years... once the House of Representin' comes into place, you will know Idiocracy has become fully true.

(it's far too accurate already for my comfort zone)

How can you have a boring conference in London? (2)

smitty_one_each (243267) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160631)

They need to be more authentic, and go to Boring, Oregon: https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Boring,+oregon&hl=en&ll=45.431226,-122.353363&spn=0.580164,1.231842&sll=39.531771,-76.822755&sspn=0.019926,0.038495&hnear=Boring,+Damascus,+Clackamas,+Oregon&t=m&z=10 [google.com]
I'll note that there is also a Boring, Maryland northwest of Baltimore (The City That Breeds [citythatbreeds.com] ). However, the proximity of DC means that something interesting could happen. For example, a hardcopy of ObamaCare could fall on you, causing injury.

Re:How can you have a boring conference in London? (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42160677)

For you pussies assed fuckin non belivers, may you have your heart reaped from your chest and your body tossed off the side
http://www.topoquest.com/map.php?lat=39.05619&lon=-120.38563&datum=nad83&zoom=2&map=24k&coord=d&mode=zoomin&size=l
You don't believe in jack shit, then neither does BIGFOOT EXIST, cause once you go here, you won't ever be seen again!
GPS UP, and ya prolly can't go there now duh... BETTER DO ME INSTEAD YA FUC http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3288123&cid=42160477

Re:How can you have a boring conference in London? (1)

Dogtanian (588974) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160689)

Oregon is probably a bit far for people in the UK though. They could have held in in Boring's twin city^w town^w village of Dull [wikipedia.org] in Scotland, however.

I work in the POS industy (1)

Lozrus (1609329) | about a year and a half ago | (#42160685)

Supermarket checkout and cash registers are the subject of every bloody conference I visit!

Re:I work in the POS industy (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42161287)

Supermarket checkout and cash registers are the subject of every bloody conference I visit!

Next one you're at, please suggest they make them not suck so much. Ta.

Re:I work in the POS industy (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42162287)

Next time the decision arises, think about getting some qualifications and/or skills so you don't have to work as a checkout monkey.

Ok, nigger?

Fascinating? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42160803)

Does it mean attenders can rightfully demand their money back?

Boring conference (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42160821)

Like that conference its really bored and spending time. People have to think about that.

http://sultanaseo.blogspot.com/

Made me laugh (1)

foniksonik (573572) | about a year and a half ago | (#42161539)

"Waiting for more than half an hour in the November cold to get in, one conferencegoer wondered aloud whether the surprise queue was what it seemed. "Maybe it just goes on and on and at 5pm they'll let us out the other side?" he mused. "That would be really boring." "

Lol

Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? (2)

Dan East (318230) | about a year and a half ago | (#42161835)

Please tell me Ben Stein narrated the slideshow of toasted bread pictures.

You Want Boring? (1)

Ganty (1223066) | about a year and a half ago | (#42162707)

Fifteen years ago I worked in I.T. Support at a company making paper products. One of the salesmen was quite proud of his 120 slide Powerpoint presentation on toilet paper.

Ganty

Re:You Want Boring? (1)

pjt33 (739471) | about a year and a half ago | (#42164019)

That sounds quite interesting - more interesting than showing it on a normal screen, at least...

Re:You Want Boring? (1)

Amouth (879122) | about a year and a half ago | (#42193157)

you laugh, but there is a lot of science in making toilet paper, i can easily see 120 slides in a presentation on the topic.

Misunderstanding (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42163855)

But it hasn't been shut down. It's just been renamed TechEd.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>