×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

cancel ×
This is a preview of your comment

No Comment Title Entered

Anonymous Coward 1 minute ago

No Comment Entered

46 comments

Dolf Lundgren wants to what? (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#42325419)

Not if Apollo Creed has anything to say about it!!!

It's "Zoe", not "Zof" (5, Funny)

ZaMoose (24734) | about a year ago | (#42325423)

She "also discussed whether her colleagues in Congress know enough about technology to make informed decisions on tech policy".

This is one of those trick questions, right? I mean, "No, next question." is too easy, right?

Re:It's "Zoe", not "Zof" (4, Funny)

TheCarp (96830) | about a year ago | (#42325629)

That is so not true, these people are our best and brightest! Hello.... you think congressmen don't have indoor plumbing? They know how tubes work, they know what happens when you put them in a series. They arn't stupid.

Re:It's "Zoe", not "Zof" (4, Funny)

ZaMoose (24734) | about a year ago | (#42325685)

Absolutely. The US Congress contains the best and the brightest graduates of law school that we currently...

WE ARE SO HOSED.

Re:It's "Zoe", not "Zof" (1)

slick7 (1703596) | about a year ago | (#42332103)

Absolutely. The US Congress contains the best and the brightest graduates of law school that we currently...

Bought dogs have leashes.
Leashes have handlers.
Handlers have people to answer to. Once you find "these" people, the inquisition should begin

Re:It's "Zoe", not "Zof" (0)

Quila (201335) | about a year ago | (#42325745)

Yes, Congress includes a person who thinks the Apollo astronauts landed on Mars. Not our brightest.

Re:It's "Zoe", not "Zof" (4, Funny)

ZaMoose (24734) | about a year ago | (#42325813)

Re:It's "Zoe", not "Zof" (2, Insightful)

Quila (201335) | about a year ago | (#42325995)

Johnson was obviously joking about stationing too many people on the island. Jackson-Lee honestly asked a NASA official if the Mars Pathfinder had photographed the flag planted by Neil Armstrong. Her office accused those who pointed out her stupidity of racism.

Re:It's "Zoe", not "Zof" (1)

LordLimecat (1103839) | about a year ago | (#42327315)

You might say that, until you see the part where he says [youtube.com] "....tip over....[insert flipping motion with hand]... and capsize".

Honestly, the hand motions are what kill me-- that, and the admiral trying to keep a straight face.

Re:It's "Zoe", not "Zof" (1)

Quila (201335) | about a year ago | (#42328087)

That's what makes it funny, and obviously a joke.

Some things like this are jokes. Some things are the speaking version of typos like Obama's 57 states. A rational person can't really believe that he thinks therea are 58 states. But others simply show ignorance. Jackson-Lee on the Mars Pathfinder was classic. Most Democrats and some Republicans when referring to guns are just displaying ignorance. Take Obama during that debate saying automatic rifles should be illegal, that's just ignorance. And then Romney trying to equal the ignorance, saying they're already illegal.

Re:It's "Zoe", not "Zof" (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#42326017)

hehe that's funny,

and was probably meant as a funny remark when the congressman said it. Much is lost in translation, copying video or audio to text, ...

Re:It's "Zoe", not "Zof" (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#42326159)

Or maybe you should watch the video and realize he actually sounded that stupid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cesSRfXqS1Q [youtube.com]

Re:It's "Zoe", not "Zof" (1)

Quila (201335) | about a year ago | (#42326791)

Sometimes the humor is too dry to many to catch. Also, some people aren't very good comedians and shouldn't be making jokes. Take Romney talking about opening the window in a jet. He has spent more time in private jets than most of us and obviously knows what's up, but his delivery was too deadpan. Many in the audience caught the joke (you do hear laughter), but he left himself open to claims of stupidity.

But Jackson-Lee, that one was real. She was asking an honest question.

Re:It's "Zoe", not "Zof" (1)

dywolf (2673597) | about a year ago | (#42326121)

a congressman who flatly and publicly calls all her colleagues idiots will soon find herself on no committees and with no support at anything she tries to do. Effectively rendering herself powerless and unable to do anything.

That's why the diplomatic phrasing.
One of those word games politicians play.

A representative of the people doing her job? (4, Funny)

NettiWelho (1147351) | about a year ago | (#42325461)

Nothing to worry about, MAFIAA has already dispatched a squad to deal with her.

Re:A representative of the people doing her job? (2)

KiloByte (825081) | about a year ago | (#42325491)

Let's see, have we seen MAFIAA's tentacles in action [slashdot.org] recently?

Chris Dodd complained that Congress isn't bought (1)

tepples (727027) | about a year ago | (#42325929)

That and MPAA chief and ex-Senator Chris Dodd complaining that Congress isn't bought enough [slashdot.org]. Dodd "suggested in a Fox News interview that Hollywood would cut off campaign funds for President Obama and other lawmakers who withdrew support. 'I spent 36 years on Capitol Hill and have great personal friends, and you'd think they'd know better.'"

ICE ? (0)

rossdee (243626) | about a year ago | (#42325501)

I thought the ICE was melting due to global warming.

Fortunately there has been a bit of snow here which has made most of the slick ice that happened with the freezing rain over the weekend have a bit more traction so you can walk on it.
And theres no highs above freezing in the next 7 days forecast

Pirates and global warming (1)

tepples (727027) | about a year ago | (#42325945)

I thought the ICE was melting due to global warming.

If the pirates are winning, how is there still a warming trend? This must disprove Pastafarianism.

We can fix this problem (4, Insightful)

1s44c (552956) | about a year ago | (#42325831)

These agencies of the US government are abusing the DNS system, our DNS system. We should replace or at least supplement DNS with something they can't abuse, something peer2peer. Nothing short of that will fix the DNS abuse we keep seeing.

Namecoin was a good idea but it's not going to work as currently implemented. Maybe something similar could.

Namecoin (-1, Redundant)

tepples (727027) | about a year ago | (#42326011)

We should replace or at least supplement DNS with something they can't abuse, something peer2peer.

Namecoin perhaps? It's a parallel DNS authority forked from Bitcoin.

Re:Namecoin (1)

gparent (1242548) | about a year ago | (#42326185)

Jesus, you don't even read the comments anymore? Why do you people browse this site?

Re:Namecoin (1)

tepples (727027) | about a year ago | (#42327561)

I made a mistake. What's the biggest flaw of Namecoin?

Re:Namecoin (1)

1s44c (552956) | about a year ago | (#42330471)

I made a mistake. What's the biggest flaw of Namecoin?

Domain squatting due to the low cost of registering domains. Also there is nothing to stop me or you registering 'microsoft'.

See my comment above.

Re:Namecoin (1)

1s44c (552956) | about a year ago | (#42330455)

We should replace or at least supplement DNS with something they can't abuse, something peer2peer.

Namecoin perhaps? It's a parallel DNS authority forked from Bitcoin.

Yeah I meantioned that. Seems you didn't get to the end of my comment. Anyway - namecoin as currently implemented is prone to exactly the same domain squating problem that conventional DNS suffers from. It needs a solution to that, and that's not so easy to design.

Maybe something like a small cost to register a name you already have a .com for ( provable by adding a text record to the .com ), and a very high cost if you don't. Maybe also a landgrab like phase where users can only register the domains they own the .com for. Repeat for all other generic domains and leave the country code domains managed by the countries.

Then add as many new generic domains as we like. .net, .org, .info, .name, and so on.

Re:We can fix this problem (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#42326397)

There is no "fix" for DNS. DNS is the fix. The DNS hierarchy basically handles a variety of cases. Any peer to peer system would either converge into DNS or devolve into a world with no Internet security. In a P2P system a compromised peer can spread misinformation far and wide and be pragmatically untraceble. Even a quorum system would allow a botnet to easily corrupt it.

If you want to replace DNS, you will need to replace SSL/TLS, PKI, SMTP, and several load balancing or content delivery solutions. You would probably need to update ClamAV, too (look at how it checks updates). Additionally, your new solution will need to work out of the box on the major operatings systems (Windows, OS X, Linux, Android). Furthermore, the replacement will need to offer more security and easier configuration to overcome the inertia that DNS currently has.

Re:We can fix this problem (1)

snadrus (930168) | about a year ago | (#42329135)

"Web of Trust" systems would be a required basis to prevent compromise problems. I see many solutions to a botnet (group compromise) problem:
- Consider peer lifespan: How long has this peer been known-good?
- Consider change pattern: did google.com just change in the 2 places you trust, but not 15 others?
- Sign the data: Pull a whole block of name resolutions signed by "Google, MS, Apple, US, EU, & China" trusted keys, & only consider updates signed by a similarly-large group that mutually doesn't trust each other.

SSL doesn't need DNS if you have pre-trusted roots. It trust chains can be be complex without a need for DNS.

Re:We can fix this problem (1)

1s44c (552956) | about a year ago | (#42330513)

"Web of Trust" systems would be a required basis to prevent compromise problems.

I'm not sure. Anything that has trusted systems is open to legal attacks from the bad guys.

Only peer2peer has proven to be safe from the two great evils of our age - governments and botnets.

Re:We can fix this problem (1)

1s44c (552956) | about a year ago | (#42330337)

Peer2peer doesn't have to mean the quorum wins, or that a single compromised node gets to screw everything up, or that a botnet can p0wn the whole network. What you are describing are problems with badly designed peer2peer.

If you want to see a well designed peer2peer application look up the bitcoin paper. On a technical level the bitcoin network and blockchain is very well designed regardless of its use as a currency.

Re:We can fix this problem (1)

cpghost (719344) | about a year ago | (#42335441)

Even if you fix DNS and make it p2p and censorship resilient, they'll force the ISPs and tier-1 backbone operators to withdraw BGP route advertisements to (AS hosting) sites they don't want you to visit. Now try to fix that!

Informed Decisions? (2)

sanosuke001 (640243) | about a year ago | (#42325837)

Just take a look at Ted Stevens' "series of tubes" comment to see the ineptitude of congress. Lets say, for the sake of argument that Stevens was "dumbing it down" for his peers in congress and he was well versed in techno-babble. He himself felt that it was necessary because he felt that his peers didn't know wtf he would be talking about by speaking intelligently and, therefore, they were not capable of making informed decisions. Now, if we go to the side of the coin where we assume Stevens had no idea what he was talking about, then the person attempting to make an argument didn't know a damn thing about technology and we're still screwed.

I, for one, believe there should be some sort of test you need to pass to prove you have basic understandings of certain things before you can represent others. Or, better yet, choose people in the field to make policy; go to MIT, Stanford, IBM, Microsoft, Google, etc and make a tech representation senate. We don't NEED everyone in the government making decisions on everything; spread out the responsibility to those who are experts.

Re:Informed Decisions? (1)

JWW (79176) | about a year ago | (#42326333)

I, for one, believe there should be some sort of test you need to pass to prove you have basic understandings of certain things before you can represent others.

How about this test:

Do you have a law degree?

Yes: Oh, I'm sorry you're not qualified to be a representative....

Re:Informed Decisions? (1)

sanosuke001 (640243) | about a year ago | (#42326957)

heh, its a nice thought but there are benefits for having someone there who does understand matters of law. however, they shouldn't be making policy choices regarding science, education, welfare, etc because they are probably not experts; especially if they are more concerned with re-election and campaign contributions to do what is best for the nation (though, that could be the case with anyone we choose to represent us; even experts)

Re:Informed Decisions? (1)

Quila (201335) | about a year ago | (#42326619)

I, for one, believe there should be some sort of test you need to pass to prove you have basic understandings of certain things before you can represent others.

Or at least to be on committees for certain subjects. Jackson-Lee was on the science committee at the time she asked her famous question about when the Apollo astronauts landed on Mars. Most Democrat reps are completely ignorant on guns, so should be kept away from any committee related to them. Consider Todd Akin who thinks a woman's body can automatically reject a rape pregnancy. Someone like Steve Israel is a double threat, ignorant on guns and technology, wanting the firmware of 3D printers locked down so they can't make guns. Luckily these two are not on related committees, but they should definitely be barred.

But I'm more worried about assignments where the critter does know better, but has an agenda in opposition to the people. The two Howards (Berman and Coble) are on the committee for "IP" yet they are completely in the pocket of the MAFIAA. They should be barred due to conflict of interest.

Physical goods need quick-return as well (2)

davidwr (791652) | about a year ago | (#42326113)

Quoting from the linked article:

âoePhysical goods can be held in escrow or in a warehouse and they wonâ(TM)t necessarily decay or degrade,â

Many goods are perishable. Many that are not are also "part of a process" as well.

Imagine if a small-business brick-and-mortar movie store was credibly accused of piracy and the cops came in and seized ALL of the DVDs and waited weeks or months to return those that weren't reasonably suspected of being pirated. They value of that inventory would likely go down over time, especially for recently released titles.

Imagine if the cops went one step further and padlocked the building. The business would be unable to pay its rent or mortgage and would likely be forced into bankruptcy.

Now, you can argue that a store that is pirating doesn't deserve to be in business in the first place, but that's what we have courts and "due process" for. Let the industry sue for fair damages and injunctions. If actual criminal acts occur, the the government file charges in criminal court. A conviction on any serious charge will shut down most small- and medium-sized companies.

The quote that got botched (1)

davidwr (791652) | about a year ago | (#42326135)

Quoting from the linked article, 2nd try:

"Physical goods can be held in escrow or in a warehouse and they won't necessarily decay or degrade,"

Re:Physical goods need quick-return as well (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#42331421)

Areas for due process improvements in these cases,
      1) the chance for the store to defend themselves before being squashed
      2) the chance for consequences for the originator of the questionable information which started the proceedings in the first place
      3) the chance for consequences for a seizure in excess of what is supported by the charges

Lofgren Q&A on Tech Policy (2)

GovTechGuy (1267056) | about a year ago | (#42326669)

Meant to include this link: http://www.rollcall.com/news/seeing_the_internet_as_a_place_for_freedom_to_flourish-220070-1.html [rollcall.com] From the post: "I don’t want to critique my colleagues. My degree was in political science, not computer science. So, you have to teach yourself. I spend as much time as possible trying to become a knowledgeable person. I don’t claim to be an expert, but I’ve read a lot of books and I’ve taken some courses on how to do some simple programming. And I actually did some simple programming a long time ago in college. So I’m not an expert, but you need to have at least some concept of how the technology works to avoid making mistakes." --Lofgren

Re:Lofgren Q&A on Tech Policy (1)

MexiCali59 (1824682) | about a year ago | (#42326781)

Meant to include this link: http://www.rollcall.com/news/seeing_the_internet_as_a_place_for_freedom_to_flourish-220070-1.html [rollcall.com] From the post: "I don’t want to critique my colleagues. My degree was in political science, not computer science. So, you have to teach yourself. I spend as much time as possible trying to become a knowledgeable person. I don’t claim to be an expert, but I’ve read a lot of books and I’ve taken some courses on how to do some simple programming. And I actually did some simple programming a long time ago in college. So I’m not an expert, but you need to have at least some concept of how the technology works to avoid making mistakes." --Lofgren

What a novel concept: actually understand technology before legislating it.

Craziness (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#42327191)

The dajaz1 case shows government can't be trusted

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...