Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Commercial Water Cooling, And Quiet

timothy posted more than 13 years ago | from the silence-is-golden dept.

Hardware 128

Aleaxander writes: "I followed this link about three weeks ago and may have found something I've been looking for for a long time; a way to make my PC's quieter while still keeping my systems cool. A commercially available case that is water cooled, and which according to the above review seems to perform well on the cooling front, while also running quietly? Will I be able to finally stand having an overclocked PC running in the room while I am watching TV, listening to MP3's or simply waiting out a long download while doing something else? I hope so. Anyone who has bought or tested one of these cases should post their impressions, because the specifications listed on their site probably don't tell the whole story (the chart on cooling in the Comparison section that uses a graph from Tom's Hardware, and tags their Ambient Temperature on the bottom scares me)." And really, there's no reason that water-cooled computers should be any more exotic than radiators in cars (well, except for the energy-chuggin' high power use they would imply).

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Older PC's (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#227813)

Will I be able to finally stand having an overclocked PC running in the room while I am watching TV, listening to MP3's or simply waiting out a long download while doing something else?

You don't need more than 90 MHz for both of the above. UNDERclocking your PC seems to be the solution.

They are nice and quiet (2)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#227814)

My company bought two of these cases about three weeks ago. We had bought some AMD systems with fans that were *really* loud. At the time, we couldn't find any fans that would do the same job quietly, so we got these cases.

They are very quiet, even when the fans kick in to cool the water (which isn't that often). The temperature gauge on the front usually reads about 98 when the computer is idle, and we can get it up to about 101 when we run CPU intensive tasks for a few hours straight.

We aren't doing any overclocking, nor are we cramming as many hard drives and cards in the box as possible; they're just your basic desktop computer. So, while I can't tell you how good a job they do cooling in extreme situations, it's more than adequate for normal use and it probably makes less noise than the computer you're sitting at right now.


Quiet cases with water cooling (3)

Paul Komarek (794) | more than 13 years ago | (#227816)

I've seen a few posts saying that water cooling doesn't really reduce the noise enough to make it worthwhile, partially because of hard drive noise among other things. One advantage of water cooling over aircooling is that you can use the water to move the heat away from the computer itself (within reason).

Imagine, then, acoustically insulating your case using foam, cardboard, carpeted wood, or whatever. With an air cooled case, you have just screwed up your air cooling because of too many holes in the acoustic insulation. With water cooling, you only need to allow the water cooling hoses out of the acoustic insulation, and they can go to a big radiator *outside* of the acoustic insulation.

Of course, you will want a way to access the CD, floppy, and power switch. ;-) I would think that making the front of the acoustic enclosure into a door would work.

-Paul Komarek

PSU Limitations (2)

drix (4602) | more than 13 years ago | (#227817)

On the Koolance website [] they say that the water-cooled power supply only works for systems under 1ghz and with non-DDR RAM, even though it's rated at 300W. For people who want to go higher, they reccomend an air-cooled PSU at... 300W. So it's not like the cooler itself is sucking too much power. Can anyone shed some light on this? I posit that no one who cares enough to buy these cases are going to be running under 1Ghz, either before or after overclocking. On one of the distributor's web sites they say only that you shouldn't use DDR with it, meaning I guess that 1Ghz is okay. I really want to buy one of these cases for the noise reduction, and of course the PSU is one of the biggest sources of noise. OTOH I must have the latest and greatest, which means a P4 in the 1.5Ghz range. Anyone aware of what thes technical limitations stemming from a using liquid cooled PSU (even of identical voltage) are, how they relate to RAM and processor speed, and any ways to flout them? Thanks!


Re:PSU Limitations (2)

drix (4602) | more than 13 years ago | (#227818)

Answered my own question. []


more info on water cooling (1)

MentlFlos (7345) | more than 13 years ago | (#227819)

Here is a great site: []

on a side note, I just ordered a waterblock from so I can watercool my pc. whee!
The art of flying is throwing yourself at the ground...

Re:Koolance Cases: Early adopter's experiances (1)

Omnifarious (11933) | more than 13 years ago | (#227820)

Allthough the Liquid Nitrogen debate still runs hot.

Ouch! Bad pun!

Re: The next post we'll see... (1)

PRickard (16563) | more than 13 years ago | (#227821)

gsfprez: Jessis - get your stories straight... i mean, if the poster wants a silent computer so that he doesnt have to hear the fan blowing all the time.. they call them iMacs and fucking Jobsian G4 Cubes... there's no need to bother with some weird ass hydro-powered case like it was a fucking Russian sub with James Bond at the tiller.

I was going to post that if nobody else did..

I have two iMacs - a 2nd gen 333mhz and a 3rd gen 500mhz. The 333 came with a fan, like standard PCs, and the 500 was Apple's new fanless design. Comparing the two, the 500 is faster and quieter than the 333 - the only noise is when the HD is working a lot or when I've got a CD/DVD in the drive. I haven't noticed that the 500 runs any hotter than the 333, and time to time I've even noticed more heat pouring out of the older machine. The older one had a sucky sound card and speakers, but I couldn't tell because of the blow dryer sound coming from the back. The fanless design and built in Harmon Kardon speakers/soundcard make my 500 sound better than a lot of stereos I've seen.

Compared to a PC, the fanless iMac still runs cooler than an old AMD 486/80 box I recently turned into a flower planter. Hell of a lot more useful, too.

Read the FAQ (2)

Quarters (18322) | more than 13 years ago | (#227822)

4) Q: I am interested in over-clocking my system. Would a Koolance PC help me with this?

A: The current PC addresses our intended customers: the home and office user, who admire a quiet system with the added efficiency of liquid cooling. For the high-performance user, we do not feel our present system can accommodate the additional stresses placed on it by overclocking the components. Please check the news page for updates on our performance-oriented PC model coming in August.

Re:Inevitable (1)

creinig (18837) | more than 13 years ago | (#227823)

> The power supply and the disks makes quite a lot of noice as well

Well, I have a Quantum Fireball lct15 at 4400rpm and I can't hear it spinning (air-cooled non-overclocked wimpy 400MHz celeron). Head movements are clearly recognizable, but not loud. It's more of an informational "hey, I'm doing something, in case you're interested" thing.

Re:First Impression (2)

avdp (22065) | more than 13 years ago | (#227824)

Looking at the resellers that sell these things... They have additional cooling units ($15-$25 extra for each) for additional CPUs, chipset, video card(s), and hard drive. That pretty much covers anything that might cooling.

Re:Leery (3)

Brento (26177) | more than 13 years ago | (#227825)

Does anyone know what happened to those cooling systems that used a crystal that would absorb/emit heat as electricity was applied?

I think you're talking about Peltier coolers. They're definitely gaining market share - they're on the rack at my local CompUSA, even. They go for around $25-$50. They work as advertised, but they use a lot of electricity. They're no quieter than a regular CPU cooler, though, because they still require a fan.

The next post we'll see... (3)

gsfprez (27403) | more than 13 years ago | (#227826) that someone in here has found a way to squish their computers into a 8 inch by 8 inch by 8 inch cube!

Speaking for the Mac users...we all thought that it wasn't a real need to have a computer run silent? No, sorry let me rephrase that..

We had it jammed down our pieholes that when Apple started making fanless computers, that it "was no big fucking deal, bitches" and why don't you worry about getting 3-fucking button mice instead and you Mac users give a shit about the stupidest things...blah blah blah

Jessis - get your stories straight... i mean, if the poster wants a silent computer so that he doesnt have to hear the fan blowing all the time.. they call them iMacs [] and fucking Jobsian G4 Cubes [] ... there's no need to bother with some weird ass hydro-powered case like it was a fucking Russian sub with James Bond at the tiller.

And yes, it can run linux []

Re:They are nice and quiet (1)

Your_name_here (28454) | more than 13 years ago | (#227827)

Problem is that the liquid temperature isn't terribly useful... If the therm was on the die, it would be much more useful...

The cooling wall with water cooling is the efficiency of the waterblock/heatsink. You could push compressed freon through that system, and if the heatsink/block sucks, you'll still fry your chip.

Isn't it the opposite? (2)

GauteL (29207) | more than 13 years ago | (#227828)

I may be wrong, but doesn't making things smaller actually _decrease_ heat output?
Every time the transistor size decreases, it has been possible to increase the clock-rate, and decrease the amount of voltage required.
One of the reasons Athlons will soon be viable as processors for laptops is because of decreased transistor size.
I would guess that if Moore's Law DOES NOT continue, liquid cooled computers will become necessary.
Why are processors hotter today than they used to be? Because the extreme competition has made the manufacturers increase clock-speed and add features without always being able to decrease the size of the silicon.
Could someone confirm this, or perhaps prove me wrong?

Re:Inevitable (2)

Polo (30659) | more than 13 years ago | (#227830)

Whoops, you're forgetting something...

This system replaces several fans: power supply, case fan, video fan, (hard disk fan), cpu fan, etc...

But... Smaller fans have much more noise and move much less air.

Actually, really large fans are quieter and can move prodigious quantities of air.

So the best system would have 1 large fan.

Re:So much for efficiency (2)

Polo (30659) | more than 13 years ago | (#227832)

Yeah, but then they'd need more machines.

Re:But will it.. (2)

-Surak- (31268) | more than 13 years ago | (#227833)

(Yes, I know you were kidding, but it's a point that should be made early in this discussion)

No, it won't cool your beer. This is NOT a phase change system like some of the systems posted here before. It just uses the (water-based) liquid for heat transfer (exactly like your car radiator), so it can't get the temperature below ambient room temp.

A phase change "heat pump" system (like an air conditioner or refrigerator) needs a compressor, coils, and special fluid. It would hard to make quiet.

Re:The next post we'll see... (1)

nexthec (31732) | more than 13 years ago | (#227834)

possibly because you dont want to send it to the background?

Re:well now... (1)

s390 (33540) | more than 13 years ago | (#227835)

And _damn_ slashcode for inserting a space where a post linewraps - if I'd wanted a space byte there, then I would have _typed_ one, dammit!

Re:well now... (2)

s390 (33540) | more than 13 years ago | (#227836)

I once _had_ an (OK, used) RX7 Turbo that unfortunately developed a sticky fuel injector. I didn't get it fixed in time, so the car burned up one day.

However, water-cooling systems are _much_ simpler. I wouldn't hesitate to water-cool a hot Athlon chip. Swiftech ( markets wicked air-cooling heatsink/fan assemblies and water-cooling (block-only, pieces, kit, or bare-bones system) - with or without Peltier assist with water-cooling - that have gotten good reviews. I'm running an old 500 mhz Athlon at 700 mhz right now as I post this, with a Swiftech heatsink/fan and Peltier.

Bear in mind, though - a Peltier won't help much at high thermal loads such as recent Athlons throw off. At most, you might see 5% chip efficiency improvement from adding a 155-watt TEC, and you'll have to dissipate over 180 watts from the system!

If you want to really cool a system well - and quietly too - look at evaporative water cooling (think of nuclear plant cooling towers) or vapor phase-change cooling, perhaps with a liquid (50/50 to 80/20 water/glycol) buffer stage: .html . . . There _are_ ways to get your chip die down to -40 C.

Re:well now... (2)

s390 (33540) | more than 13 years ago | (#227837)

Um, the actual reference is: e .html

Re:The next post we'll see... (1)

(startx) (37027) | more than 13 years ago | (#227838)

How the fuck did this get modded up? It's a piece of shit flamebait.

Re:Inevitable (3)

overshoot (39700) | more than 13 years ago | (#227839)

The basic rule is W=CF(V**2) -- the capacitance of the switching nodes times the switching frequency times the square of the supply voltage. Capacitance has been going up as oxide thicknesses have come down, along with more layer of metal. Frequencies have also gone up; you might have noticed. Voltages have come down, but not nearly as fast as the other two have gone up.

My 500 MHz K6-2 ran on 2.2 volts; my 1200 MHz Thunderbird runs on 1.8 -- even if the capacitance had stayed constant (and it hasn't, by a long shot) the power would have gone up 60%.

Re:Inevitable (1)

Skyfire (43587) | more than 13 years ago | (#227840)

  • My experience with watercooling is though, that even if its more effective, it doesnt reduce the "total" sound of the box. The power supply and the disks makes quite a lot of noice as well... There's no real need to cool CPU in a quiet way, if disks still makes noice
The PSU is also going to be cooled with water, making the source of the noise of the PSU (the fan) pretty much nonexistant. The hard drives, however, are something that people just sort of have to live with, however if you shop around, some are quite a bit quieter then others.

I'm about to order one of these. (2)

NetJunkie (56134) | more than 13 years ago | (#227842)

My case is too loud. I'm an overclocker and I've got about 8 fans in my case right now. It's just too loud as it is. I didn't really want to build a water cooling rig myself, but now that these guys have one integrated into the case I'm going to do it.

Anyone know what the lead time to get one is right now? I'm sure they are busy with all the press they've been getting lately.

cooler methods (IMHO) (2)

joq (63625) | more than 13 years ago | (#227844)

I posted this before somewhere but it applies more here... One way to make a nice little set up for your machines is to create your own crate like addition which could follow the typical dimensions of a desk. Now it would have to be enclosed at least the section where your pc is going to be placed which makes for cool security too if you want to add a lock to it. No one could remotely root it via booting in single modes...

Anyways what you'd do after making the enclosure is insulate is with fiberglass insulation sold at a typical hardware store (dirt cheap), drill about an 4 inch slot into the side somewhere or the back if you have enough space or the side and attach a floor standing Penguino air conditioner [] along with a hose used for clothes dryers. The insulation keeps both the cold air in and noise out. Not only that but when your not using your PC's you could remove the hose and cool your house.

New Blackbox Themes []

My Impressions on Koolance (1)

tripwyre (67521) | more than 13 years ago | (#227845)

My older brother assembled one earlier this week and here are my impressions, which by the way are far from thorough or scientific. Now for the obligitory system specs:

AMD Athlon 1.33 GHz
Asus A7V133 KT133A Motherboard
Corsair PC-133 256M memory
nVidia GeForce2 GTS 64M
Soundblaster Live Value
Western Digital ATA-100 7200rpm 40 gig hard drive
Netgear FA311TX Fast Ethernet Card
Koolance Case with Liquid Cooled power supply and CPU

First off, none of the above specs have been over-clocked yet so that he can make sure his system runs fine pre-overcloking. Secondly, this case does stay cool. It was close 80 degrees Fahrenheit in his place and the temperature never got above 108. Yesterday, with the air-conditioning on it never got above 100 even after being up for hours. Thirdly, the case is QUIET! The fans that cool the reservoir kick in at 95F at 45% power and are very near silent. Even after putting my ear right next to it, I could barely hear them. The major source of noise in his PC comes from the fan attached to the chipset and even that is fairly quiet and likely could be replaced with something much quieter(But I'm not a hardware guy so take that with a grain of salt)

BTW Everyone should read the [H]ard|OCP artical for an indepth review.

Re:LAN Party (1)

tripwyre (67521) | more than 13 years ago | (#227846)

Yes, the case itself is 40 pounds but leaking isn't a problem unless you crack the reservoir or the hoses.

Re:And.. (1)

tripwyre (67521) | more than 13 years ago | (#227847)

In the Koolance case if the CPU reaches 129 degrees fahrenheit the fault alarm will sound which(assuming your near your PC) should be enough warning.

Re:So much for efficiency (1)

plague3106 (71849) | more than 13 years ago | (#227848)

No, the problem is poorly managed deregulation. If it was done properly, there would be no energy crisis in CA. I believe NY and PA deregulated without problems.

But right now its the market that's to blame; there are quite a few people getting rich off of the shortage in CA...unfortunatlly they are doing in such a way as to make the shortages worse, not better.

Re:Isn't it the opposite? (1)

Shook (75517) | more than 13 years ago | (#227851)

It seems to me, that advances in cooler-running processors always means one step forward, two steps back. My 486 had a small fan, and no heatsink. My 286 had a ridiculous-looking little heatsink, with no thermal paste, and no fan. It also seems like the speed of the processors are increasing exponentially, while the size of the processors are increasing linearly (approx.) The number of transistors in a P4 has doubled many times since the days of the 286. But a P4 chip is significantly larger than a 286

Hard|OCP has a review (1)

jidar (83795) | more than 13 years ago | (#227852)

The folks at did a review on this case recently. You can find the review here:

Seems to be a pretty nice case actually. In all honesty I wouldn't mind having it, but the primary reason I wont buy it is because I want to build my own. Although it's cool (heh) to have a water cooled case, it's infinately cooler if you built it yourself.

Re:Inevitable (1)

ct (85606) | more than 13 years ago | (#227853)

While there may be no PSU fan to make noise, there are fans in the cooling base of the unit. While they are variable speed & controlled by a temp. sensitive controller, don't get your hopes up too high. The fact of the matter is that the fans have been moved one or two steps aways from their original locations. At some point the exchanged heat will need to be dissipated - and as of yet, I haven't seen a solution that doesn't produce noise. I've seen people brag about having zero fans in their refrigerant based cooling system - then the condenser/compressor kicks in and you have new "source" of noise.


Re:Leery (2)

ct (85606) | more than 13 years ago | (#227854)

It almost sounds like your 'crystal' based is in fact a Thermoelectric (TEC or Peltier) cooler.

Without getting into details here, you can read an intro about them here: x.html []

and how to make one here: _cooler/ []

Once thing that I'd be cautious is running their dual CPU liquid cooler. According to the picture on the right of this page : /CPUjacket.html []

the heated "exhaust" coolant from the first CPU is directly looped into the intake of the second CPU, rather than having separate coolant loops for each. I'd be interested in knowing exactly what the difference in CPU temp was between the first and second CPU's when running full tilt.

(And yes, I do realize that the primary CPU in a dual system generally runs under a greater load & therfore would require greater degree of cooling,)


Koolance Cases: Early adopter's experiances (3)

rrhal (88665) | more than 13 years ago | (#227855)

If you're interested in these cases check out this thread [] at ars-technica. They seem to be everything you could want in a water cooling system. Allthough the Liquid Nitrogen debate still runs hot.

Re:Older PC's (1)

mikael_j (106439) | more than 13 years ago | (#227859)

You don't need more than 90 MHz for both of the above.
Well actually, if his computer is an x86 based system, then 90MHz is not enough to play decent (160kbps+) MP3s...

/Mikael Jacobson

"But surely we won't be still stuck with Linux in 25 years!?"

Not now (2)

Animats (122034) | more than 13 years ago | (#227860)

Not after IBM finally got rid of all the water-cooled mainframes in their product line.

As a practical matter, this cooling system doesn't offer cooling for the graphics board. Recent 3D boards consume more power than the CPU. Heatsinks on the RAM and fans on the graphics chips are common.

Koolance also doesn't give info about allowable inlet air temperature, so you don't know what this is really good for. Inlet air temp specs today are lousy; most Compaq stuff has a 95F inlet air temp limit, which will be exceeded in non-airconditioned environments in most parts of the US. You really want a limit around 115-120F.

Water and electronics don't mix too well... (1)

Vorro (124142) | more than 13 years ago | (#227861)

All we really need to screw the whole thing up is for one of the many tubes is to spring a leak, at which point you need to make sure you have popcorn handy (and quick too), because for about then next five seconds, you can cook some damn good popcorn.

In theory, anyways.

koolance too much too soon? (1)

DRAGONWEEZEL (125809) | more than 13 years ago | (#227862)

The Koolance cases apear to be the next best thing since the heat sink. It is going to be hard for them (if the cases do work as good as some claim) to keep up w/ demand.

case cooling (1)

DRAGONWEEZEL (125809) | more than 13 years ago | (#227863)

there are a bunch of fans on the bottom of the case blowing up at an angle. This helps reduce noise and keeps case kool

Re:Leery (1)

vu2lid (126111) | more than 13 years ago | (#227864)

These are available even now. I bought a bunch of these shapped in the form of CPU cooling units around 6 months back from a "Hamfest" in Ohio (around $2.5 I think). The guy who sold these was complaining that he could not sell many, but were selling like hot cakes sometime back !!

Re:Leery (1)

librarygeek (126538) | more than 13 years ago | (#227865)

I saw these guys at comdex chicago. They took a small take and submerged a motherboard, and power suppply compleetly in their cooling solution. They had the HDD sitting out of the fluid and had the pc up and running quite nicely while fully submerged.

Re:Leery (1)

librarygeek (126538) | more than 13 years ago | (#227866)

oops, typo... take=tank

Re:First Impression (1)

librarygeek (126538) | more than 13 years ago | (#227867)

The demo unit i saw had the ability to add additional cooling plates for more HDD's and it also has a cooling plate for the graphics chip. Also, in the desktop model case i looked at, there are 3 cooling fans built into the bottom in a seperate compatment that held the radiator. Those fans were operated by a control circut that determined when the system needed the extra cooling. There is also an LED readout of the temperature of the fluid. Unfortunatly there was no feedback from this device to the PC itself so you cannot software monitor the temp of the fluid.

Shameless self-promotion (1)

Daniel Rutter (126873) | more than 13 years ago | (#227869)

I've got a couple of recent pieces on water cooling on my site. This one [] 's a mix-and-match test of a few pieces of cheap(ish) commercially available hardware, with much rambling on the subject of what's doing what to whom; this one [] covers throwing a Peltier device into the mix, and how to tell if it'll do you any good (executive summary: if you're overclocking a current Athlon, one Peltier, even with a very high rating, probably won't cut it).


aiken_d (127097) | more than 13 years ago | (#227870)



Re:Water in a power supply.... (2)

sik puppy (136743) | more than 13 years ago | (#227871)

If a tv transmitter can have a water/antifreeze based cooling system moving around in a 30kV environment, whats the worry with 120/240?

Re:Instead of Exotic, be practical (2)

alleria (144919) | more than 13 years ago | (#227872)

The Dynamat is a good idea, and so is the hooded vent at the back, but they hardly make a PC completely silent, which Home Theatre PC users and college audiophiles demand (I never turn my comp off, and most other ppl don't either.)

If you want some more good hints and tips, head over to AVS Forum [] and the Home Theatre Computer Section, and do a search on the word "quiet." Lotta people talking about all sorts of various solutions.

Re:Leery (1)

subsolar2 (147428) | more than 13 years ago | (#227873)

The problem with the peltier(sp?) devices were that they were not terribly effient. They would typically produce twice as much heat as they removed. This is a big problem inside a computer case where there is enough heat being generated already.

The devices are still used in portable electric coolers since they can exaust the hot air from the heat exchanger directly to outside air.

- subsolar

Re:The next post we'll see... (1)

Drone-X (148724) | more than 13 years ago | (#227874)

I have a question about your nickname: why did you pick (startx) and not (startx&)? I don't understand the point in executing startx in a new shell but not sending it to the background.

Re:The next post we'll see... (1)

Drone-X (148724) | more than 13 years ago | (#227875)

But then why execute it in a new shell? If you don't want to return to the command line you normally execute: startx

If you do want to return to the CLUE immediately you type: (startx&)

If never seen anyone use (startx).

On second thought. Perhaps '&' isn't allowed in a slashdot username.

Re:cooler methods (IMHO) (1)

ZikZak (153813) | more than 13 years ago | (#227876)

Wow! That sounds both dirt cheap and really practical, too! You end up spending only $100 at the hardware store (oh yeah, plus $1,000 for the air conditioner) and then spending all weekend building an ugly plywood box that will sit on your desk. And it will take you at least all weekend because the way you described fiberglass batt insulation and the 'hose' used for venting dryers makes it painfully obvious that you're not very familiar with a 'typical hardware store' or how to use the things they sell. Anyway, after that your computer will be totally super quiet and way cool. Too bad that air conditioner right next to it is making so much fucking noise, though.

Re:I've seen these bad boys in action (Koolance) (1)

cornflux (168139) | more than 13 years ago | (#227881)

I live 5 minutes away from the first vendor for these units (Infotech) so I've been researching the Koolance cases for quite some time.
Hey, I live that close to Infotech, too (Federal Way), and I've been thinking about going down there to check that case out... even if it is just "window shopping." So, it sounds like they have it set up and running... now I definitely need to go.

I've seen these bad boys in action (Koolance) (3)

tshak (173364) | more than 13 years ago | (#227884)

I live 5 minutes away from the first vendor for these units (Infotech [www.infote...argetblank] ) so I've been researching the Koolance cases for quite some time.

They are quieter then a normal power supply, but they still make some noise. They seem to be very well manufactured, just by eye-balling the unit. Definatly not a "hack job". I personally haven't bought one yet (my PII350 is cool enough thank you), but it's on my list if I ever go for those cool 1GHz Athlons that can be safely OC'd to 1.4GHz+. $180+ depending on configuration - but that's the price you pay for being cool (pun intended)!

dummy lights and gauges :) (1)

simonwagstaff (173538) | more than 13 years ago | (#227885)

the LED readout of the fluid temperature that librarygeek mentions is cool -- (or is it really LCD?). Either way, that should be a standard part of a decent case.

In fact, I'd like to see an LCD with a numeric output, and with a (green / yellow / orange / red) quad-bank of LEDS beneath it, for (easy / questionable / dangerous / stupid) temperature levels.

remember, there should be more LEDs, everywhere and in everything :) Matter of fact, that's the chief reason I would like to one day acquire a BeBox -- those dancing LEDs are worth more than the machine's current processing-power-money ratio.

Just like in a car, there isn't a true conflict between dummy lights and gauges -- please give us both! :)


Build Your Own (1)

gshutt (179344) | more than 13 years ago | (#227887)

a whole bunch of stuff on building your own water cooler: []


well now... (1)

Capt. Beyond (179592) | more than 13 years ago | (#227888)

I can see a water cooled power supply being somewhat safe, since the connections are to the outside of the unit, and I might even look into one someday. But having pressurized water a few centimeters away from my processor would scare the living crap outta me!! I've seen old car engines where the fuel lines were leaking on the manifold. It reminds me of that. scary!!! I can imagine a hot summer day, and the power goes out, and the frickin' plastic tubes get hot enough to melt and *sssppprrrinnkleeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!! all inside the box. I dunno about that one.

Re:well now... (1)

Capt. Beyond (179592) | more than 13 years ago | (#227889)

Actually, I am interested in the acoustic side. My new scsi drive throws off so much heat anyway, I could fry an egg on it!!

Re:Inevitable (2)

boaworm (180781) | more than 13 years ago | (#227890)

Im not really sure liquid cooling will be that widely adapted. Sure it reduces the temperature better then air-cooling, but how do you cool the water.. fans anyhow. There are of course alternatives to this, like huge metal wings in the air and stuff. So, it gives better (and more quiet) CPU cooling, but not more quiet

My experience with watercooling is though, that even if its more effective, it doesnt reduce the "total" sound of the box. The power supply and the disks makes quite a lot of noice as well... There's no real need to cool CPU in a quiet way, if disks still makes noice.

Really quiet (2)

Alien54 (180860) | more than 13 years ago | (#227891)

Probably the best way to get things really quiet is to treat the noise problem as a separate isse from the cooling issue.

Noise as an issues is like best handled by isolating the machine partially in a cool cabinet with sound baffles. There are folks who go overboard into the noise reduction. some recommendation I have seen include reducing the speed of your machine so that the computer can run without CPU fans. I have also seen power supplies that do not have and do not need fans because the design.

Needless to say, you need to have a handle on your priorities.

Check out the Vinny the Vampire [] comic strip

LAN Party (1)

yogensha (181588) | more than 13 years ago | (#227892)

What about lugging one of these to a lan party? The water must make the case a bit heavier and would it leak if it tipped over in the trunk? That would suck.

Abstainer: a weak person who yields to the temptation of denying himself a pleasure.

Re:Older PC's (1)

yogensha (181588) | more than 13 years ago | (#227893)

A Celeron is much more optimized for that sort of thing. MMX for example. Not to mention the greater floating point capacity. Comparing a P5 and a Celeron on a mhz to mhz basis doesn't make sense.

Abstainer: a weak person who yields to the temptation of denying himself a pleasure.

Instead of Exotic, be practical (4)

krystal_blade (188089) | more than 13 years ago | (#227894)

So many people today simply don't cross over into other areas when they are looking for something.

The best item I've found (I'm not an overclocker, mind you) to quiet hard drives, and CD roms are the following items...

1. Teflon tape. Wrap it around the head of mounting screws. It will act as a "threadlocker" for high RPM CD-Roms (which can loosen the screws through vibration.

2. Thin rubber mat. See above.

3. DynaMat, or another acoustic absorbing material.

In fact, the ultimate way to quiet a PC is to make a "snorkle, over the top side of the PC. Take some sheet tin, available at any hardware store, use a razor blade, and a pair of tin snips, or heavy duty scissors. Leave small fins for mounting it to the back of your PC, line it with DynaMat, and you've just knocked out about 60 to 70 percent of your PC's noise, the cooling fans. Make sure you use a rubber, or teflon washer when mounting it.

Line the inside of the PC with DynaMat, (leave room for vents, of course) and the only sound you'll hear from your PC is when you're swearing at it.


Re:Isn't it the opposite? (2)

lucius (189447) | more than 13 years ago | (#227895)

I also may be wrong, but I have the feeling that the relavant quantities here are also not the density on the chip and some function of the switching speed and the switching current. So while the transistor area may decrease by, say, a factor of 2, the switching current by a factor of sqrt(2) and the speed increases by a factor of sqrt(2), say. Then the heat given off would be proportional to the heat per transistor times the density, which will be the same heat per transistor as the old chip times double the density: so we get double the heat output.

This is all on the absolutely shady side of things of course, I'm assuming that the current is proportional to the linear dimensions of the transistor, so it goes as the square root of area, which is the relevant quantity when calculating density.

Also, I had to assume that heat is proportional to the switching current times the speed, and that the speed varies inversely with the current.

But the point is, it is conceivable that heat output would increase with decreasing size.

Re:case cooling (1)

Papa Legba (192550) | more than 13 years ago | (#227896)

I couldn't tell to well from the picture but it looks like their is a plate that blocks them from the interior of the case , their docs seemed to indicate they are for cooling of the water only. I am basing my observations of their PC case picture that shows stuff mounting to the bottom of the case above the cooling unit.

Re:First Impression (1)

Papa Legba (192550) | more than 13 years ago | (#227897)

I was not saying you could not get more cooling devices, but that their pump , according to them, only can handle pumping to three of them. From their FAQ -

8) Q: How many liquid-cooled components can I place into a system? £

A: With our current PC model, we recommend a total of three liquid coolers for best operation. This includes the power supply-- if three coolers are needed elsewhere, please consider our alternative model with an SPI 300W power supply. Filling a case with liquid cooling components puts a heavier burden on the impeller pump, which may lead to decreased performance in the way of higher temperatures.

First Impression (4)

Papa Legba (192550) | more than 13 years ago | (#227898)

After reading the site and poking at the specs I have some misgivings, some of the specs seemed cooked in their favor to me, for one I noticed that the SCSI hard drive in dual fan case is listed as running at 138 degrees Farenheit, making their HD cooling solution beat it by 34 degrees. The fact is that ALL of my SCSI enclosures run at 125 to 130 degrees. They start to alarm at 130 and warn me of failure. The average is around 127 degrees across about 30 drives. This means that they are beating the HD fan solution by 13 degrees. This also makes me wonder if that is the case since they pushed the higher numeber up did they also push the lower number down, is the total savings closer to 5 or 6 degrees? With this noted, that they are playing with the HD cooling numbers, how many of the other numbers they list are being played with?
With the fact that their solution can only handle 3 devices total this does not make HD cooling overly practical.

I also noticed that their case did not contain any case fans for other circulation, with their solution only providing cooling for three devices (let's pick CPU, Power Supply and one HD) That means you have to air cool the rest. Their case does not seem to have good ariflow, and if I am having to add case fans then I am loosing the quieting fucntionalty that is desired.
this looks like a good idea , and from reading the FAQ they have put some thought into this (especially in the area of condensation) but until they can handle more device off of the pump in the case I think I would personally give this a miss.

Re:Leery (1)

nekid_singularity (196486) | more than 13 years ago | (#227899)

What was the cooling fluid?

Re:So much for efficiency (1)

nekid_singularity (196486) | more than 13 years ago | (#227900)

Bullshit. USA Today had an article in it a few weeks ago about how California is the lowest state in per-capita energy consumption, at about 6 thousand kWhrs per person per year. The worst state was more the 4 times as high. Obviously, the problem is simply that they aren't generating enough electricity to keep up with demand. population * per-capita consumption * saftey margin = generation capacity needed, and Califonia just cant meet that. maybe it has something to do with the fact that a new power plant hasn't been built in over ten years? Nah.

Wil it be possible (1)

hhg (200613) | more than 13 years ago | (#227901)

To rip the electronic-stuff out and use the tower as a refigerator?

Re:Leery (1)

Segfault 11 (201269) | more than 13 years ago | (#227902)

Both water and Peltier coolers have some issues with hardware destruction. The water lines sometimes DO leak. Peltiers (these days referred to as thermoelectric coolers, or TEC's) may leave condensation. The net results are mold and/or corrosion.

These days overclocking doesn't seem as worthwhile, though. You save money and get better performance just by buying the faster rated processor. Nobody wants the GHz Athlon anymore because the 1.33 is only a few bucks more, and the price difference between the two is significantly smaller than the cost of midrange/high end cooling kit.

Re:Leery (3)

aussersterne (212916) | more than 13 years ago | (#227905)

They're called peltier devices, and they're still around. They're not popular because they require water cooling to work well with the current batch of CPUs.

See, an AMD Thunderbird will dissipate as much heat as a sizable incandescent light bulb and do it in a very, very small space. Peltier devices aren't magic -- they still have to obey the laws of physics. Yes, one side gets cool, but the heat has to go somewhere. It goes to the other side.

The catch is that the peltier device draws a lot of current, so it has to dissipate a lot of heat of its own. So, collect all of the heat coming off your CPU, plus all of the added power dissipation (a huge amount) generated by the peltier device. All of this heat will turn up on the "warm side" of the peltier, which really ought to be called the "hot as freaking lava" side.

If you hook a 100 watt peltier up to your Athlon (which you'll need because an athlon may be dissipating 60-80 watts) and you don't water cool your peltier, you'll quite literally melt it to pieces and it will stop working within a matter of minutes or even seconds. Of course, once the peltier has more or less dissolved into little chunks, there will be no "cool side" to keep your CPU cool and your CPU will fry as well.

Even if you do get a peltier+water rig working, it's never quite safe because the cool side gets so much cooler than room temperature that condensation starts to form all over the place and you end up shorting your CPU out anyway.

In short, it's safer to just cool things to room temperature using a water rig without the peltier element, which is just too risky and will still need water to cool it with any recent CPU.

Re:But will it.. (1)

BlueJay465 (216717) | more than 13 years ago | (#227906)

You could do it with a series of Peltier Elements. Loop your coils through a few heat sinks attached to them and you would have an effective heat pump that would be noise-free. However, the cost would be prohibitive since they run about 25 bucks apiece and use quite a bit of power.

Re:Quiet cases with water cooling (2)

BlueJay465 (216717) | more than 13 years ago | (#227907)

Wouldn't those noise dampening sheets that you can find for cars (ala Crutchfield [] ) work in this scenario? They would be good since they are only 0.075" thick. And to line the inside of your PC wouldn't cost more than $50US

Re:Not now (2)

BlueJay465 (216717) | more than 13 years ago | (#227908)

Yes they do offer a module for the graphics board [] . Look at their website again.

Inevitable (2)

Mnemia (218659) | more than 13 years ago | (#227909)

If Moore's Law is to continue, liquid cooled computers are probably an inevitability. After all, in order to stuff more transistors into the chips you have to make the wires smaller which increases resistance and thus heat output. Sooner or later, our air cooling systems just won't cut it anymore...

But... (1)

ishrat (235467) | more than 13 years ago | (#227911)

But do the machines really make so much noise so as to disturb one from other activities? I watch TV as well as listen to music while working at something, at other times my kids are doing the watching while I work, but I've never had any problems.

I got one (1)

sams2100 (237327) | more than 13 years ago | (#227912)

I am running one now and it works great. I still need to buy a peltier cooler for it, but other than that, its workiing like a charm. I barely hear a hum coming from it (which are the fans in the back cooling the water).

One thing about this case, is that its HEAVY! It weighs a ton! So it must have a good bit of water in the base.

I would recomend this case to anyone, very easy to setup, very nice look, and very cool.

Re:I got one (1)

sams2100 (237327) | more than 13 years ago | (#227913)

Also.. I read someone comenting about if you tip it over, will the water pour out... no. The case is shipped with the water in it, as well as some other special stuff (probably anti-freeze). I had mine shipped UPS Ground, so for 5 days, the ups guys kicked it, threw it, dropped it, sat on it, and maybe even ate lunch on it. And when it got here, the box had holes punched in it and everything, but when I opened it, there was another box inside surounded by packing peanuts. Thanx to Koolance for putting it in a box inside a box, or else it may have been dented. And all the water was in it, all the tubing was run, just open it up, put mobo inside, remove heatsink, and put water cooled heatsink in place of the old, and flip the switch. Works great and even has a little tempature thing on the front, bottom, left... tells temp of the water... even lets you switch between C and F. Along with the temp display, there are 3 lights... 1 is lit for fan power, second is lit for fan overdrive on, and the third is used for if your system is reaching the critical stage. With a peltier, I'm sure this system would REALLY kick ass.

No overclocking (2)

sonofepson (239138) | more than 13 years ago | (#227914)

Seems like this is not yet the answer overclockers are looking for. From their FAQ
I am interested in over clocking my system. Would a Koolance PC help me with this.

The current PC addresses our intended customers, the home and office user who admire a quiet system with the added efficiency of liquid cooling. For the high-performance user, we do not feel our present system can accommodate the additional stresses placed on it by overclocking the components. Please check the news page for updates on our performance-oriented PC model coming in August.

Re:But... (2)

baptiste (256004) | more than 13 years ago | (#227917)

Well, it depends - my Athlon 700 has three fans, one fo which is in the power supply, two case fans (one in one out) and the heatsink fan - It isn't bothersome most of the time, but if you are watching a quiet movie by the fire with an SO - (my desk is in teh den) it is noticable during quiet periods in the movie.

I definitely see one of these babies in my future!

Of course my Athlon is nothing compared to my server room - 5 boxes, plus a firewall was a VERY loud fan, and a 4 disk RAID array tower. PLENTY of noise there! - They used to be in my office - too noisy - now they'll be in a room above my garage - Hopefully I won't be able to hear them in the house LOL :)


Re:They are nice and quiet (2)

baptiste (256004) | more than 13 years ago | (#227918)

I believe the display on the front is driven off a sensor embedded right into the cooling paddle that sits on the CPU - so it indicates the CPU temperature itself (or pretty close) Better than those blue thermistors.


Re:Quiet cases with water cooling (2)

baptiste (256004) | more than 13 years ago | (#227919)

I've seen a few posts saying that water cooling doesn't really reduce the noise enough to make it worthwhile, partially because of hard drive noise among other things.

And there are others saying you can hardly hear the 3 small fans in this unit. Yes, the hard drives make some noise and that a fact, but every spinning device in your PC is adding to the noise level. By reduceing the fan count in your average geek box by at least 3 or 4, it makes a huge difference.

Most review sites publish stats on HD noise so if you really want a quiet system you can shop for the best value drive with performance AND noise taken into account.

So a system like this - for the price, is a godo deal if you enjoy peace and quiet even in the room your PC lives in.

Of course if the vendors would ever get power mgmt working in a reliable and std manner - our PCs woudl shut down when we weren't using them without requiring a reboot :) I've used dozens of PCs and it always seems like some suspend nicely, others don't - and RedHat - heck I can't even get it to shut off my monitor (and yes I have power mgmt configured in my kernel!)


Re:And.. (2)

baptiste (256004) | more than 13 years ago | (#227920)

Which is cool - but what they REALLY need to do is provide a fan header that pulses at 4K a minute or somethign to fake the mobo into thinking its a fan - if the pump dies, the signal stops and the mobo will take action (most new mobos will shutdown if the fna dies or at least will raise an alarm) Plus most mobos have temp thresholds to shut down if they are exceeded.


Water in a power supply.... (2)

baptiste (256004) | more than 13 years ago | (#227921)

I really want one of these babies. But seeing water tubes going into the power supply with 120 or 240VAC dancing around just makes me squimish. Even though I'm sure its not a big deal - the design looked very nice where the tubes stopped at the cases edge and inside was just a metal cooling assembly. I'm sure I'll quickly get over it and get one anyway :)

Of course - I can't imagine UL signing off on these Power Supplies, but maybe they already have if they are robust enough. Are they UL listed? If not I can imagine this will be an issue of concern in the corporate world.


P4 and water? (1)

TheSHAD0W (258774) | more than 13 years ago | (#227923)

I wonder how well this water cooling system would work with Intel's Pentium 4 processors? One of the problems people had with the P4 is that the dang thing would slow itself down when the chip got too warm. Would a good water cooling system keep this from occurring? I'd love to see benchmarks on air-cooled versus water-cooled P4 systems...

Eep! Incompatible! (1)

TheSHAD0W (258774) | more than 13 years ago | (#227924)

Should've read more. I suppose one could swap the power supply for a conventional unit with a fan, and then have the water cooling system handle only the processor, chipset and video heat sinks...

And.. (1)

unorthod0x (263821) | more than 13 years ago | (#227925)

...what happens when the pump dies? Will your OC'd CPU bake to kingdom come? One advantage with having fans is that you can often hear when they are on the fritz and about to die, giving you time to compensate and put a replacement in. But if the pump is so quiet, would you know when it's about to croak? How can you tell? How quickly and easily could you get a replacement pump for it?

So much for efficiency (1)

cryptochrome (303529) | more than 13 years ago | (#227927)

Ever wonder WHY California is running out of power NOW? Guess what - it ain't environmentalists and it ain't oil shortages. It's a staggering increase in demand due to the increased number of electronic devices, in particular air conditioners and computers. Server farms [] are especially a problem. But instead of investing in more efficient chip designs like PowerPCs or Transmeta Crusoe processors, they run them off of hot, inefficient Pentium 3s, 4s, and so on. And now they're overclocking and water cooling them? For crying out loud, does your mp3 program really need that much?


Re:Older PC's (1)

dswan69 (317119) | more than 13 years ago | (#227928)

Or you could turn the TV up above a whisper and then you can't hear the fan anyway.

Leery (3)

number one duck (319827) | more than 13 years ago | (#227930)

I'm leery of plugging anything even remotely close to leaking into a computer. (How often does my car leak, you ask?)

Does anyone know what happened to those cooling systems that used a crystal that would absorb/emit heat as electricity was applied? I remember seeing ads for them as much as 8 years ago, then they suddenly disappeared...
They just strike me as the best of both worlds.. an actual cooling affect instead of a fan, without the risk of a liquid based system. (These crystals *were* mounted on a fan, they were energized on the one side and released on the outside so as to yank the heat out of whatever they were mounted on)

Re:Leery (1)

kesuki (321456) | more than 13 years ago | (#227931)

Peltier coolers are still available, the problem with a peltier cooler is that using electric current to move heat, generates heat. There is also a problem with the number of operating hours before failure on a peltier cooler. In my experience with peltier coolers they last as a cooling device for about 3-6 months before they become an 80 watt heater. The last thing a CPU with 50-70 watts of heat dissipation at spec needs is an 80 watt heater. I haven't used many peltier coolers, so I could just have bad luck with them, but the combination of high power requirements and limited ability to move heat, which then has to be dissipated from the other end through a conventional heatsink, lest the peltier fail prematurely... Peltier coolers are great for a cooler that you plug into your car so that your drinks stay cold on road trip, but they're not a good solution for making processors run cooler. IMO the 'best' solution is adapting an actual compressed gas solution. Your Fridge runs 24/7 for 30+ years and the higher end models are whisper quiet. Proven to be a stable technology, that can be designed to run quiet, and that can not only cool a processor, but that could easily dissipate the type of heat that Intel is claiming 'future' processors will be cranking out heat dissipation in the hundreds of watts... While I'm not sure that existing compressed gas coolers are 'quiet.' there are only two on the market I've seen, one sold for complete systems, the other adaptable to fit most motherboards. How long before someone trys to engineer one that Does run as quiet as possible through noise dampeners on the compressor and low noise fans?

Emergency Cooler- Poor man's version (1)

vbprgrmr (411532) | more than 13 years ago | (#227932)

After running my computer for 2 hours in my 85 degree room, my computer would constantly lock-up. In a moment of anger, I pulled off the case and took my 18 inch window fan and ran it facing the motherboard. The computer works fine now and never locks up. It certainly isn't a pretty solution, but it does show that heat is a serious problem for PCs, and may worsen in the future with everfaster CPU and bus clock speeds.

Will RAM speed and peripheral data tranfer speed ever equal CPU clock speed? Talk about heat!

Re:The next post we'll see... (1)

pagsz (450343) | more than 13 years ago | (#227936)

The next post we'll that someone in here has found a way to squish their computers into a 8 inch by 8 inch by 8 inch cube!

I already did that using nothing but a standard sledgehammer. Of course, it didn't run afterwards, but what's the difference between that and installing Windows?

Hard disk noise (1)

blang (450736) | more than 13 years ago | (#227937)

some are quite a bit quieter then others.

Amen that. A few months ago I was installing a second IDE drive (Maxtor,15G) in a Sun workstation, and I thought for a while that I must have done something wrong. I could not hear any chugging or spinning, and when I put my hand on it I could feel no vibrations, so I assumed I had damaged the drive. But from the software side of things, the drive looked just fine. It's not that long ago, that standing in front of a disk array booting up, was almost like sticking your head into a jet engine.

Cooling Systems for Computer Devices (1)

rTx (451503) | more than 13 years ago | (#227938)

I am conducting a study at work, trying to evaluate new ways of cooling computer and telecom devices, on many applications, ranging from a simple home appliance, to a data center, or public telephone equipment. We are trying to change the usual solution of cooling an entire room, in order to control the equipment temperature. Our goal is to act directly on the main heat spots, cooling just the equipment case, or compartment, and not the entire room space. By doing this, we can have better temperature control inside the equipment, and of course save lots of energy. This could be used specially on places were equipment is working alone, and almost no human presence is needed (this is very common on many situations). Ex: Not just considering the above case, water cooled, I have seen some products that are designed to cool rack mount systems... What do you think about this issue? Do you consider a solution like this useful? Thanks, rTx
Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?