Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Lucas Says Ford, Fisher and Hamill May Return For Next Star Wars

samzenpus posted about a year and a half ago | from the what's-old-is-new dept.

Star Wars Prequels 253

93,000 writes "According to Yahoo, George Lucas has let slip that Han, Leia and Luke will return for the next Star Wars installment. From the article: 'Lucas backtracked, saying, "Maybe I’m not supposed to say that. I think they want to announce that with some big whoop-de-do, but we were negotiating with them." Then he tried to cover his tracks: "I won’t say whether the negotiations were successful or not."'"

cancel ×

253 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Keep Granpa Lucas Out (5, Funny)

Massacrifice (249974) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112111)

Luke, Han, Lea, Gweedo, hell, they can bring back the goddamn Ewoks if they want, as long they keep George Lucas himself out of the crew, they'll be fine.

I haven't healed from Howard the Duck yet.

Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43112133)

George Lucas can chug frosty piss straight from my cock.

Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out (1, Offtopic)

smash (1351) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112145)

+1 informative

Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out (0)

physburn (1095481) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112205)

Would fail the meta moderation.

Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out (1)

Jerslan (1088525) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112409)

Are you new here?

Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out (1)

Lord Kano (13027) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112439)

Are you?

Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out (1, Funny)

Zontar The Mindless (9002) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113511)

Are you?

Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out (-1, Redundant)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43112449)

Why would you do something so terrible to your cock?

Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out (0)

p0p0 (1841106) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112143)

DuckTits (oooh ooooh)

I don't think Greedo's coming back. (3, Funny)

Chas (5144) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112195)

I think he probably ended up as part of the next daily special at the cantina...

"Why's this chili green?"
"Green peppers man!"
"Oh."

Re:I don't think Greedo's coming back. (4, Funny)

meerling (1487879) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112289)

Maybe he became a Saint. After all, he was dead and holy by that time.

Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out (4, Funny)

Arancaytar (966377) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112571)

George Lucas promised that this time Jar Jar Binks would shoot first.

Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43112843)

Jenna Fisher is young enough, but Dorothy Hamill and Faith Ford would be too old.

Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out (1)

ChrisMaple (607946) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112881)

It's Henry Ford

cryo sleep (2)

goombah99 (560566) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113145)

They are found tumbling in space in lead line fridge.

oh awesome (3, Funny)

smash (1351) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112137)

I await the space equivalent of whatever the title of that travesty of an imitation Indiana jones movie was that I wasted $15 on to see in the cinema.

It's a trap! (2)

mcgrew (92797) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112235)

I saw this on TV this morning... damn but Carrie Fisher looks older than me. You guys who thought the prequels ruined your childhood...

Re:It's a trap! (5, Interesting)

CncRobot (2849261) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112297)

She recently did a special called "Wishful Drinking", which is about her life, where she complained that someone on the internet say she looked like Elton John. She said it wasn't so much that they said it as much as she understood what they meant.

She is actually pretty funny and it was a pretty good show.

Re:It's a trap! (5, Interesting)

Lord Kano (13027) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112447)

I understood her frustration. As an actress, people expected her to be 23 forever. On top of that, the years of hard drinking took a toll on her body and face so she aged TERRIBLY. I was hurt, personally hurt when I saw what all those years of drinking did to what I once regarded as one of the most beautiful women ever.

LK

Re:It's a trap! (1)

rubycodez (864176) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112693)

drinking? she likes cocaine, even in the days of acting for Star Wars.

Re:It's a trap! (1)

noh8rz10 (2716597) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112735)

live rough, look rough. c.f. lindsay lohan, alice cooper

Re:It's a trap! (5, Funny)

Black Parrot (19622) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113393)

I understood her frustration. As an actress, people expected her to be 23 forever. On top of that, the years of hard drinking took a toll on her body and face so she aged TERRIBLY. I was hurt, personally hurt when I saw what all those years of drinking did to what I once regarded as one of the most beautiful women ever.

LK

So we shouldn't expect any chain bikinis this time around?

Re:It's a trap! (2)

ChrisMaple (607946) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112889)

Who would so cruelly insult Elton John?

Re:It's a trap! (3, Interesting)

Abreu (173023) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112841)

Considering how Carrie Fisher and Mark Hammil look nowadays, the movies should be set 100 years after the Battle of Yavin!

But seriously, watching them as secondary characters and possibly mentors to a new set of young heroes would be awesome.

I'd like to see Leia as a tough-as-nails politician in Coruscant, Luke as head of a new Jedi order and Han still flying the galaxy with Chewbacca.

(yes, I am ignoring the novels and comic canon)

Re:It's a trap! (4, Funny)

AK Marc (707885) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113289)

When 900 years old you are, look as good you will not. It should be 900 years after Yavin. Because look as good, he does not.

Re:oh awesome (1)

Black Parrot (19622) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113379)

I await the space equivalent of whatever the title of that travesty of an imitation Indiana jones movie was that I wasted $15 on to see in the cinema.

The sad part is that they delayed it all those years because they were waiting for the right script to come along.

reboot? (4, Interesting)

hguorbray (967940) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112149)

Hopefully this will allow for an Abrams style reboot of the franchise as has been done with Star Trek and pass the torch to new young actors who can hopefully age gracefully for the next 10-15 years...

now all they need is enough story and character to cover about 7 hours of movie for parts 7-9

I heard that some of the clone war writers were pretty good -or maybe alan Dean Foster???

-I'm just sayin'

Re:reboot? (4, Informative)

trout007 (975317) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112191)

The Thrawn Trilogy was pretty good.

Re:reboot? (1)

cheater512 (783349) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112489)

I did quite enjoy that one as well.

Re:reboot? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43112673)

But... it was so artistically done.

Re:reboot? (3, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43112239)

zahn trilogy or gtfo

Re:reboot? (2)

isorox (205688) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112491)

now all they need is enough story and character to cover about 7 hours of movie for parts 7-9

Why start now?

Re:reboot? (1)

camperdave (969942) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112913)

Hopefully this will allow for an Abrams style reboot of the franchise as has been done with Star Trek

Not possible. The prequels already trashed the franchise. The only advantage Abrams would have is that it would be hard to make it worse.

JJ Abrams is a hack (4, Insightful)

globaljustin (574257) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112943)

Curse your filthy mouth for saying this:

"Hopefully this will allow for an Abrams style reboot..."

JJ Abrams is all hype and money. His concepts are all a tease with no substance. Substance comes of course, but in his projects what we usually call 'plot', 'writing', etc are slapdash afterthoughts. He benefits from the fact that ~60% of the population will watch whatever is playing in theaters that week due to artificial scarcity of film choices.

I'm not even a Star Wars fanboi...if anything I'll claim to be a Trekkie. If you have any notion of Star Trek as a franchise and why fans like it, the 10 Minute Star Trek 2 trailer that played before The Hobbit should be all you need to see: http://www.ign.com/videos/2012/12/19/star-trek-into-darkness-first-trailer-rewind-theater [ign.com]

JJ Abrams is shit. That doesn't mean his projects are doomed. In the big-budget studio world, franchises like this become so monolithic it usually prevents stupid shit like Abrams' ridiculous lens flare fetish. Put any random 30-something film buff in his chair and let him bark orders and bullshit concepts for action scenes and you'd get the same result.

IMHO, Abrams' shit tendencies will *not* ruin Star Wars like they ruined Star Trek. Too many people with money on this understand how shitty Abrams is...

Re:JJ Abrams is a hack (1)

TheSeatOfMyPants (2645007) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113155)

IMHO, Abrams' shit tendencies will *not* ruin Star Wars like they ruined Star Trek.

Of course not, the people responsible for Jar Jar Binks/Episode 1 did.

Re:JJ Abrams is a hack (0)

globaljustin (574257) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113503)

"the people responsible for Jar Jar Binks/Episode 1 did."

Right, so that'd be George Lucas. A decision made by fiat in his role as independent filmaker emperor. That's all gone now -> Disney.

The new Star Wars trilogy will *not* have a "Jar-Jar"

According to my theory, now that big industry studios are projecting 50-year profit margins on rights, a "Jar-Jar" has too much 'bad press' to make it past marketing.

Yes, big industry studios make "Jar-Jar's" but it's a different process, one that is market-tested, social media'd, and focus-grouped to death. Something so blatant as "another Jar-Jar" would raise red flags for a studio **now** given all the reviews/blog posts/word of mouth on how much Jar-Jar was hated by fans.

Also, JJ Abrams is a hack (obv) but he's more 'hip' because the women he bangs are younger (my guess). He'd veto a "Jar-Jar" even though overall he's shit.

Re:JJ Abrams is a hack (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43113263)

Nerd RAGE!!!!!!!!!!11

Seriously, its a movie. Nobody kicked your dog.

Re:JJ Abrams is a hack (1)

globaljustin (574257) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113513)

I love that I elicited such an emotional response from you using complex ideas and with sources cited.

What your comment tells me is, from a 2nd order Cybernetics perspective, my excoriation of JJ Abrams had the punch of a flamebait text art comment but the complexity and intellectual gravitas of an essay.

Thanks ;)

Re:JJ Abrams is a hack (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43113479)

And on top of all that, let's pray that John Williams writes the score instead of Abrams' buddy Michael Giacchino. Giacchino simply doesn't have the chops to pull off that kind of work, and IMO he's a talentless hack compared to Williams.

Re:reboot? (1)

a_hanso (1891616) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112969)

No no no... have you any idea what happens when you mix light sabers and lens flares?

Re:reboot? (2)

TheSeatOfMyPants (2645007) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113193)

No no no... have you any idea what happens when you mix light sabers and lens flares?

Well, my theory is that's how Rainbow Brite came about in the 80s...or was that the result of light sabers and LSD?

Re:reboot? (2)

dbIII (701233) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113023)

Bring on Abrams, he'll deliver the Jedi Mind Meld.

Re:reboot? (1)

click2005 (921437) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113313)

Remake it seriously? Has the story not already been told and retold with how many versions on even more formats?
Everyone will be disappointed with some parts that failed to live up to whatever fanboy expectation they happen to have.

Instead of pissing away an obscene amount of money on one film that has already been told to death they could make 100 smaller films employing a whole load of writers, actors and crew. Thats a hundred new films that could become the next Star Wars.

Re:reboot? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43113451)

Hopefully this will allow for an Abrams style reboot

A reboot would be nice. Get rid of those darn midichlorians and make it all spiritual again.

He was misunderstood (4, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43112151)

What he said was that they may APPEAR in the next film, but what he means is that he's using footage from the first three movies, and digitally recreating them. The human actors will not be involved.

Re:He was misunderstood (2)

Ol Biscuitbarrel (1859702) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112273)

So they'd take the footage from the original films and rearrange it to make new stories? Beats using them as is - the pictures of the actors in TFA are a bit alarming. Hamill looks like a long haul trucker who's in great pain from attempting to digest a short stack of pancakes.

Definitely tag this "NOOOOOOOOO!" Or is it "NOOOOO!"?

Re:He was misunderstood (1)

larry bagina (561269) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112739)

god-damn, I just googled up a picture of him and only stopped laughing to wipe away the tears. Face like a welder's bench.

Re:He was misunderstood (1)

noh8rz10 (2716597) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112743)

Definitely tag this "NOOOOOOOOO!" Or is it "NOOOOO!"?

do not want!

Re:He was misunderstood (1)

ciurana (2603) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113449)

The correct tag:

"DO NOT WANT!!!"

Cheers!

Uh, oh... (5, Funny)

mrsam (12205) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112171)

... I have a bad feeling about this.

Re:Uh, oh... (5, Insightful)

ArsonSmith (13997) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112721)

Sir, the possibility of successfully creating a good new star wars movie is approximately 3,720 to 1!

Re:Uh, oh... (5, Funny)

Abreu (173023) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112851)

Never tell me the odds!

Re:Uh, oh... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43113211)

Let the wookiee write the script R2.

Ford? (1)

fermion (181285) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112211)

While Fisher seems to have confirmed it. Can't see Hamill has anything else to do. But how much are they going to pay Ford to do the work?

Re:Ford? (1)

PNutts (199112) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112265)

It had better be at least 12 parsecs because the last I read Harrison Ford for whatever reason was DONE with Star Wars and Han Solo.

Re:Ford? (1)

rubycodez (864176) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112711)

well of course, the thing ended in 1983 why would Ford wait around for 16 years.....and then it started up again with horrific sequels

Re:Ford? (4, Insightful)

Miseph (979059) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112311)

Do you really think they wouldn't be able to afford him? This is a new Star Wars movie being made by Disney, they can and will spend whatever amount of money they need to get whatever it is they want, and they'll still turn a profit even if it sucks.

Re:Ford? (1)

Lord Kano (13027) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112473)

Do you really think they wouldn't be able to afford him? This is a new Star Wars movie being made by Disney, they can and will spend whatever amount of money they need to get whatever it is they want, and they'll still turn a profit even if it sucks.

He certainly doesn't need the money like some of the others but if he's expecting a 10 million dollar payday, he must be going senile. Sean Connery can still command top dollar, but Ford? That's just not going to happen?

LK

Re:Ford? (1)

Adult film producer (866485) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112825)

there was a short news blip about this recently on NPR and Ford said he would be willing to have a role in the new movies with the condition that his character dies. whether or not that means being in all three movies is up in the air.. I thinks its a bad idea to bring any of them back.. let jj do what he has to do to reboot the franchise without hamstringing his creativity with old characters and old ideas. if jj wants them.. cool, but don't force him, please!

Re:Ford? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43113117)

Pretty much, this. Disney was willing to dump 4 billion dollars to buy the franchise. Somehow, I doubt a few tens of millions of dollars would perturb them from hiring one of the most notable actors from the original trilogy.

Re:Ford? (4, Informative)

westlake (615356) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112567)

While Fisher seems to have confirmed it. Can't see Hamill has anything else to do.

Mark Hamill has become one of the most successful and sought after vocal talents in the business.

Film and television animation, video games, audio books and so on. The definitive voice of The Joker.

Re:Ford? (5, Informative)

ArsonSmith (13997) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112707)

yea, sure looks like Mark has been sitting on his but for the last 25+ years

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000434/ [imdb.com]

Let the Cockney flow through you... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43112767)

...and your journey towards the Brit Side will be complete!

Seriously, thanks for the IMDB link - I would have never known that Hamill and McDiarmid got along on set because they both liked British Comedies otherwise.

I'm now picturing a weird seen where the Emperor is cackling over an episode of Are You Being Served?

Re:Ford? (2, Funny)

jbeaupre (752124) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112783)

So Han Solo didn't sign first?

Given the condition of the former stars.... (0)

Grayhand (2610049) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112251)

The next three installments will be sponsored by Slim Fast after negoiations with Jenny Craig fell through.

But (4, Funny)

JustOK (667959) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112279)

Did Han sign first?

Re:But (4, Interesting)

Beardo the Bearded (321478) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112467)

In the book, everyone else in the cantina starts backing away because they knew how foolish it was to let Han get his hands under the table.

Everyone else in the story knew that Han was going to shoot Greedo except Greedo. That made his death hilarious. He went after a guy with a bounty without even doing his homework.

Re:But (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43112691)

Of course he did, do you see Harrison Ford getting work another way?

George Lucas says: (1)

Culture20 (968837) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112369)

"I don't own Star Wars any more what are you bothering me for?"

Publicity stunt (1)

jgotts (2785) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112405)

There is no such thing as bad publicity. It's a fake leak.

Why so serious? (1)

jfdavis668 (1414919) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112411)

Try different characters: Ford as Bob Falfa, Fisher as Jake's ex-fiancée, and Hamill as the Joker

Re:Why so serious? (1)

Beardo the Bearded (321478) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112479)

I'd love to see Hamill as the Joker. He's great as the voice.

Re:Why so serious? (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43112545)

Why do they call you cockknocker?

Actually, its a funny story....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_7HVcYjM3Y

Re:Why so serious? (1)

archer, the (887288) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112557)

If only I had mod points... laughed my butt off when I saw that in the theaters. (No, not literally!)

At Least He's Generous (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43112443)

I learned recently that George used the money from the sale to Disney for charitable donations (mostly education), saying that he had enough money already. I think that is rather impressive.

Re:At Least He's Generous (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43113251)

Yes, always impressive to give your money to the charity that you're the director of and in complete control of.

Casting... (0)

meta-monkey (321000) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112471)

So, is Fisher playing a Hutt..?

Oooooooooooo........

Make Good Use of Them (1)

Mandrel (765308) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112513)

I hope the old characters are integral to the plot and don't just appear in a token torch-passing at the start. I'm hoping more like Obi-Wan in the original movie.

Re:Make Good Use of Them (1)

fuzzyfuzzyfungus (1223518) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112527)

I hope the old characters are integral to the plot and don't just appear in a token torch-passing at the start. I'm hoping more like Obi-Wan in the original movie.

With a little trick photography to deal with the height problem, all three of them will get to take turns playing Yoda.

Re:Make Good Use of Them (1)

Rary (566291) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113077)

Rumour has it that Ford's deal is a fairly significant part. I'm not sure that he'd be interested in just a cameo, to be honest. He doesn't owe Lucas squat, and has done so much since then that he barely remembers those movies, so if he's on board, it's because it's worth it for him to be on board. Sure, his role won't be as significant as in Crystal Skull, obviously, but he'll get a few action scenes and lots of dialogue, I'm sure.

I just hope he's still flying the Falcon. It's not a Star Wars movie without the Falcon breaking down (again).

Re:Make Good Use of Them (1)

F1re (249002) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113279)

The Falcon only breaks down in one movie.

Sigh... (1)

FuzzNugget (2840687) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112637)

Please, oh, please let them be in some cameo, secondary or supportive-only roles. The last thing Episode VII needs to be is Return of the Geriatrics.

Who? (4, Insightful)

Kozz (7764) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112645)

Seriously, who the fuck is "Lea"?

I know it's too much to ask the Slashdot editors to check their work, but how did THAT misspelling make it past how many geeks' eyeballs?

Re:Who? (1)

rubycodez (864176) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112755)

funny you'd think there would be a correct spelling in roman letters, for the english tongue, of a name from millions of years ago in a galaxy millions of light-years away. We could mispell it in Aurebesh....

Re:Who? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43113033)

The spelling of Leia is Cannon, and has been known for 35+ years.

Re:Who? (2, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43113209)

You mean canon?

Or um, you actually spell "Leia" as "Cannon"?

That seems confusing.

Re:Who? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43112781)

They're talking about Lea Thompson. It's the new "Caroline in the City" trilogy of Star Wars.

Re:Who? (1)

The Evil Atheist (2484676) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112799)

My experience is that many geeks are poor spellers, regardless of how ingrained certain words are in geek culture.

LUCAS was negotiating their deals? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43112809)

Is Lucas part of this? Dear god, Jar Jar will show up for sure.

Damn you Disney, you had ONE chance to get rid of him!

Re:LUCAS was negotiating their deals? (1)

MightyMartian (840721) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113163)

I think he's now a sort of Roddenberry for the Star Wars franchise. They'll use him as a consultant.

Re:LUCAS was negotiating their deals? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43113235)

Meesa think thisa scene needsa more Gungans.

Re:LUCAS was negotiating their deals? (1)

Black Parrot (19622) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113439)

Is Lucas part of this? Dear god, Jar Jar will show up for sure.

Actually he's the director this time.

WIlliam Shatner (5, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43112815)

Now that JJ Abrams is directing both Star Wars and Star Trek, can we get William Shatner to play a villain in the new Star Wars movie just for the entertainment value of the fan bases exploding at each other?

Re:WIlliam Shatner (1)

Ol Biscuitbarrel (1859702) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112947)

How about having the Shatmaster play a good guy? "NOOO...OOOO...OOOO...!!!!!"

This has possibilities (1)

Brett Buck (811747) | about a year and a half ago | (#43112973)

Star Trek, Episode 7 - Depends of the Sith

It's like having... (0)

MindPrison (864299) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113005)

...Michael J Fox back in the Future with BTTF-4 , Every diehard fan wanted it, me too in the last 5 years after the third movie. Now he's an old man, heavily into political satire and parkinsons.

My point is, as much as I'd LOVE to see another Star-Wars with the original cast, I can't imagine Carrie Fisher and Mark Hamill as they were back in the days in a new Star-Wars movie. The biggest problems with returning actors and sequels is usually the actors own ego, they always want to appear 10-20 years younger than they really are, and it always flops big-time, the only one believing that this actually works out...is themselves in their dreams.

Now...the BIGGEST hope, if you REALLY want the original cast in ANY movie, will be 3D models and animation, we've got the gear, we've got the motion capture stuff needed, now all we need - is the biggest badass renderfarm in history...and it just might work.

Re:It's like having... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43113347)

industrial light and magic...your our only hope

in an ominous voice of command... (3, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#43113259)

"these are not the old farts that you are looking for"

Re:in an ominous voice of command... (1)

Black Parrot (19622) | about a year and a half ago | (#43113443)

+1, Best Post

Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?