Slashdot: News for Nerds


Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

New Insights Help Shed Light On Star's Death That Created Kepler's Super Nova

Unknown Lamer posted about a year ago | from the very-big-boom dept.

Space 13

skade88 writes "Wired has a good article that covers the origins of the white dwarf super nova Johannes Kepler observed in 1604. From the article: 'Up until now, it was unclear what lead to the star's explosion. New Chandra data suggests that, at least in the case of Kepler's remnant, the white dwarf grabbed material from its companion star. The disk-shaped structure seen near the center suggests that the supernova explosion hit a ring of gas and dust that would have formed, like water circling a drain, as the white dwarf sucked material away from its neighbor. In addition, magnesium is not an element formed in great abundances during Type 1a supernovas, suggesting it came from the companion star. Whether or not Kepler's supernova is a typical case remains to be seen. '"

cancel ×


It's a story of greed (1)

roman_mir (125474) | about a year ago | (#43211665)

One of the 2 starts got a bit too greedy and bit more than it could chew. It's the ironic Universal response to this type of behaviour.

Re:It's a story of greed (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43211729)

It's a Death Star!

for a moment I read... (1)

MrKaos (858439) | about a year ago | (#43211871)

Help New Insights Shed Light On Death Star's That Created Kepler's Super Nova

Those Imperials will stop at nothing to destroy those Rebel scum.

Re:for a moment I read... (3, Funny)

neminem (561346) | about a year ago | (#43213145)

Yep, that's how I read it too. That the Death Star created a supernova. I was going to point out that, no, the Death Star only destroyed planets; it was the *Sun Crusher* that created super novas. Yes, I am a huge nerd. >.>

Re:for a moment I read... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43218475)

Huge nerd? More like Reader Of Dope Books.

Supernova is one word, not two. (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43212033)

Supernova [] is a single word. Like Superman, not like super freaky. Might as well get it right.

Re:Supernova is one word, not two. (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43212215)

Maybe he really meant Kepler's super Nova. You know, that car he pimped?

Editors (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43212621)

And the past tense of "lead" is "led".
Maybe the Web 4.0 version of Slashdot will include some editors.

And Another Cool Picture ... (5, Interesting)

smpoole7 (1467717) | about a year ago | (#43212157)

This stuff just fascinates me. I've known about Keppler's Supernova for years, but this is interesting new info. I'm gonna have to see where magnesium fits in stellar nucleosynthesis.

The Great Observatories Program is finding all sorts of cool stuff. :)

Here's another good picture: Cassiopeia A. The Chandra Observatory analyzed that supernova remnant and determined that the star literally blew itself inside out. []

I just love science on Slashdot (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43212371)

6 posts:
One post about real science
One grammar nazi
Four lame attempts at humor.
That about sums it up for Slashdot. Around here, if science can't be used to bash religion than there's nothing left to discuss.

Re:I just love science on Slashdot (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43212951)

You forgot someone bitching about how slashdot has changed!

universe of mostly random debris (1)

rubycodez (864176) | about a year ago | (#43212823)

we're just nova and supernova ash pondering the cycles of novas and supernovas

Did the other star survive? (2)

jfdavis668 (1414919) | about a year ago | (#43213359)

Or did the supernova destroy the second star, too?
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account