Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

A New Contender For Oldest Known Mammal

timothy posted more than 12 years ago | from the don't-worry-it's-the-*large*-paper-clip dept.

Science 7

linxx points to this Discover article, writing: "A 195 million year old mammal the size of a paper clip is thought to run around the earth along with the dinosaurs." Not everyone is convinced yet that this is a true mammal, either -- but like other aspects of science, it's an ongoing attempt to find a line of best fit.

cancel ×
This is a preview of your comment

No Comment Title Entered

Anonymous Coward 1 minute ago

No Comment Entered


Re:Oldest known mammal... (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#194483)

>Bob Dole?

No way! It's gotta be Strom Thurman... oh, wait. He's a reptile. Nevermind.

Paperclip? Wow. (1)

TheLink (130905) | more than 12 years ago | (#194485)

I heard you shrink with age. I suppose that's what you'd get for being 195 million years old.

Extinction? (1)

Woefdram (143784) | more than 12 years ago | (#194486)

Now what I think is interesting, is the question whether this paperclip was extinct in the same period as the dinosaurs or if it survived the meteor-impact that is supposed to have put an end to the dinosaurs. Or maybe it developed so quickly that after just a few centuries it had evolved into something like a mouse? After all, animals can develop rather quickly if the conditions are right. If so, we're never going to find remnants of it that are younger than 40 million years (that's when the dinosaurs disappeared, if I'm right).

further coverage of little mammal ancestor... (2)

jeffsenter (95083) | more than 12 years ago | (#194487)

The BBC also had an article on it a few days ago here [bbc.co.uk].
The Washington Post has this little piece [washingtonpost.com] on the creature.
The NYTimes didn't seem to have anything. Discover as linked in the story has the best coverage [discovery.com], but the font the story is in is really small.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account