×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Twitter Launches the World's Umpteenth Online Music Site

timothy posted 1 year,20 hours | from the re-dis-un-double-secret-intermediation dept.

Twitter 45

Nerval's Lobster writes "Twitter is plunging into the online music game. Twitter Music (or "Twitter #music," in the company's own rendering) uses Twitter activity such as Tweets and engagement "to detect and surface the most popular tracks and emerging artists," according to an April 18 posting on Twitter's official blog. Songs on the app derive from three sources: iTunes, Spotify, or Rdio. And yes, Twitter is big, but its victory is by no means assured: other IT giants have entered the same market only to watch highly-publicized projects wither away, doomed by some combination of audience apathy and implementation issues. Take Apple's Ping, for example: launched in September 2010 as part of an iTunes update, the ambitious social-networking and music-recommendation engine immediately ran into a number of problems, including a lack of Facebook integration (despite Steve Jobs' assurances to the contrary) and widespread reports of spam and fake accounts. Can Twitter's effort stand out, or will it just be lost in all the noise?"

cancel ×
This is a preview of your comment

No Comment Title Entered

Anonymous Coward 1 minute ago

No Comment Entered

45 comments

Twitter (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,20 hours | (#43483111)

So they will play the first 140 bytes of the song ?

Re:Twitter (1)

ackthpt (218170) | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483493)

So they will play the first 140 bytes of the song ?

You'll all sing like the birdies sing, Tweet, tweet, tweet, tweet, tweet!

Re:Twitter (1)

rwise2112 (648849) | 1 year,17 hours | (#43485261)

So they will play the first 140 bytes of the song ?

No, they'll choose a bit rate to make all the songs 140 bytes. It'll be fine!

Re:Twitter (1)

antdude (79039) | 1 year,16 hours | (#43485933)

I wonder how that will sound. Nothing? Heh.

Even MIDI files aren't that tiny.

Re:Twitter (0)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,11 hours | (#43488413)

Considering what the demoscene people can fit into 1 KB (see example [youtube.com]), 140 bytes could be used to produce quite complex music.

That word (4, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,20 hours | (#43483117)

I do not think it is a word. Perhaps you should try "umpteenth". Note the "m".

Re:That word (3)

ackthpt (218170) | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483509)

As a mathematician and programmer I am personnally offended it isn't (n-1)th

Re:That word (0)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483845)

As a mathematician and programmer I personally recommend (n+1)th because n -> n+1 is defined on the natural numbers, but n -> n-1 isn't

This is bound to fail (1)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,20 hours | (#43483169)

I hear the songs can only be 140 seconds long.

Re:This is bound to fail (3, Funny)

Sockatume (732728) | 1 year,20 hours | (#43483245)

Isn't that about the length of a normal pop song anyway?

Re:This is bound to fail (0)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483569)

yes but now they won't be able to repeat those same 140 over and over and call it a song, OMG its the death of pop music....actually i'm ok with this.

Re:This is bound to fail (0)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,16 hours | (#43485835)

From my lawn it sounds like 140dB too.

so what? (0)

lister king of smeg (2481612) | 1 year,20 hours | (#43483187)

why look another twitter feature I will never use

Re:so what? (4, Funny)

SJHillman (1966756) | 1 year,20 hours | (#43483201)

Because nobody should ever do anything if you, personally, won't use it

Re:so what? (1)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,20 hours | (#43483337)

Pretty much.

Re:so what? (1)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483527)

Frankly, I'm more concerned about the fact that they're devoting resources to branching out further when their original focus is in need of work.

They crippled third-party clients with the API restrictions, and have since come out with Vine and #Music. Meanwhile, DMs are still unreliable, you can't filter anything beyond blocking users or turning off their retweets, follow request responses don't work reliably, @'ing now pulls up a universal search instead of putting your followers/followees at the top of the list, and a myriad of other things they seem to be neglecting in favor of changing the mobile UI appearance.

Something tells me this outfit isn't being managed very well.

Re:so what? (0)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483429)

arnold arnold arnold rimmer
without him life would be much dimmer

MySpace? (2)

netsentry (2733393) | 1 year,20 hours | (#43483265)

Witness the devolving into indie bands patting each other's backs. Anybody notice the directional path being eerily similar to what happened to MySpace?

Incidentally, if I see someone post that they like a song on (pick your social network) I ignore it. Can't remember the last time I actually clicked one. Maybe that's just me.

Re:MySpace? (1)

tnk1 (899206) | 1 year,20 hours | (#43483371)

There are people whose opinion of music that I trust to at least not waste my time, and I'm always looking for something new. Still, I'd have to agree that signal to noise ratio on something like Twitter is likely to be something of a problem.

Re:MySpace? (0)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483521)

if I see someone post that they like a song on (pick your social network) I ignore it.

That would depend entirely on what you are using the social network for. The only group I am active in is focused on music.

If I was on Facebook with my parents I would ignore everything too.

Sigh ... (1)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,20 hours | (#43483345)

Hey Tiothy you illiterate idiot, it's "umpteenth".

What qualifies you to be an editor again? Because it aint your prowess with the English language.

Re:Sigh ... (0)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483905)

Damn you Tiothy!

Re:Sigh ... (0)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,18 hours | (#43484421)

He left out an m, seems entirely reasonable to return the favor.

Tiothy is a butt uncher.

fuck grammer nazis (-1)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483453)

and fuck you too

Hmmm ... (2)

gstoddart (321705) | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483457)

Take Apple's Ping, for example: launched in September 2010 as part of an iTunes update, the ambitious social-networking and music-recommendation engine immediately ran into a number of problems, including a lack of Facebook integration

Is lack of Facebook integration really a problem?

Admittedly, I see no value in Apple's Ping or most forms of social networking, so I'm clearly too old and grumpy, and therefore not their target market. But I can't see wanting to tell Facebook such information about myself.

To me, lack of Facebook integration is a good thing. (And, yes, I'm aware of the fact that for lots of people apparently it's the most awesome thing ever)

Re:Hmmm ... (1)

MickyTheIdiot (1032226) | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483475)

well I am not on your lawn

Re:Hmmm ... (1)

gstoddart (321705) | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483585)

well I am not on your lawn

Hey, you can do anything you want on your lawn. You can even come over to my lawn and tell me how awesome your lawn is.

But I'm not going to run out and buy pink flamingos and lawn jockeys because you think they're awesome. ;-)

I don't get it, but that doesn't mean I care about your choice to do it. I'm obviously not going to deny that loads of people use Facebook and like it, because that would be silly.

But since every site now links to Facebook, I'm betting they get to know pretty much everything you do on the web since it reports back to the mother ship. I don't have any trust in Zukerfuck, so I wouldn't provide him with any of this stuff. What you choose to do is entirely up to you.

Re:Hmmm ... (0)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483823)

"But since every site now links to Facebook, I'm betting they get to know pretty much everything you do on the web since it reports back to the mother ship. I don't have any trust in Zukerfuck, so I wouldn't provide him with any of this stuff. What you choose to do is entirely up to you."

I feel exactly the same way about Itunes.

Re:Hmmm ... (1)

Sockatume (732728) | 1 year,16 hours | (#43485891)

Given that it's a social network, its interrelationships (or lack thereof) with existing social networks were an issue. Now, as someone who doesn't use social networks, you can argue that it doesn't apply to you, but you can hardly say that it's a positive, any more than creating inedible cheese is a perk for the lactose intolerant.

Remember Myspace? (0)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483529)

That started out as a music sharing site. Then it turned into a horrible soap box for conceited and wrongfully self-entitled twats to showcase their lack of common sense understanding of what it truly means to be "social". But yes, this twitter service will be great, because music and self taken photos and 140 character sentences go hand in hand.

Oh great... (1)

yabos (719499) | 1 year,19 hours | (#43483741)

It'll just be all justin dweeber crap.

It seems like they're just acting like an affiliate that recommends music based on tweets?

TROLLKORE (-1)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,18 hours | (#43484093)

[nero-onlIne.org] they learn from our market share. Red And sling or table

App.Net (1)

ThatsNotPudding (1045640) | 1 year,18 hours | (#43484287)

Though I hate to have yet another duck nibbling my wee budget to death, an $30-some annual ad-free App.Net is starting to look appealing. Twitter still does have some utility, but it's becoming an unjustifiable time-suck; and wading through more and more ads and 'promoted' bullshit is hastening the day of departure.

Re:App.Net (0)

Anonymous Coward | 1 year,18 hours | (#43484495)

There are free invites to app.net that you can find on the net (twitter comes to mind, most invites are posted on twitter).

The limit is that you can't follow more than 40 people (or something) but it's not that bad since you can try it and see if you like it. I have a free account and I like it so far.

More info: http://support.app.net/customer/portal/articles/863836-app-net-invites-what-are-they-and-how-do-they-work-

Good luck on finding an invite!

From Michael Breon_Austin (1)

Michael_Breon_Austin (2875733) | about a year ago | (#43584407)

The Twitter #music looks like a cool concept and might gain enough traction to become pretty big. I still haven't tested ease of use, but releasing something to celebrities prior to the general public will always get people talking.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...