Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Neil Gaiman, Amber Benson and the Blood Kiss Crew Answer Your Questions

samzenpus posted about a year ago | from the listen-up dept.

Movies 44

Last week you had the chance to ask Neil Gaiman, Amber Benson and the crew of Blood Kiss about the upcoming Kickstarter movie, vampires, and their past projects. The film has reached the initial funding goal with the new target being $200K, making it an entirely fan funded film. Below you'll find their answers to your questions.Overdone?
by Anonymous Coward

Given the plethora of vampire-related media in recent years, do you believe there is still a market for this type of film? What will you bring to the table that has not already been done?

Michael Reaves: Well, how about just plain people, instead of overblown Transylvanian counts? Maybe because they're not constantly reminding their victims that "The blood is the life," they have something of a sense of humor about themselves.

David Raiklen: Blood Kiss is as much detective story as vampire tale and that is new. There's a mix of glamour and fear, classic Hollywood and the unexpected. Plus great characters, each one could have their own movie. And there's nothing supernatural about our vampires.

Vampyres of Hollywood?
by Scott Loving

Without spoiling the plot, what separates Blood Kiss from the Vampyres of Hollywood series of novels?

Michael Reaves: The fact that I've never heard of them. Lemme check out the link .... Hey, is that Adrienne Barbeau? We used to have a lotta laughs at the Batman: TAS recordings. Yo, Adrienne! (Oops, sorry; wrong franchise.)

Thoughts on Vampire rules?
by kannibal_klown

What are your thoughts on Vampire rules; such as classic vampires vs sparkling? Over the decades we've seen Vampires (and Zombies) change and evolve from the classic rules and mythology to a whole plethora of variations. Powers, weaknesses, origins, turnings, etc. Such transitions have been slow, but now we have sparkling vampires made of stone. Do you feel that we should stick more with the classic mythos? Or are you in favor with your own spin.

Michael Reaves: I'm in favor of whatever works. I can't really comment on the "Twinkleteeth" style of vamps, because I haven't seen any, but I might remind you that Hollywood has been embellishing myths ever since George Méliès punched the Moon's eye out.

David Raiklen: It's time to give old myths a new spin. The classics will still be around, and will get remade. The first cinematic vampires were not undead fiends but 'vamps' or femme fatales. So we're actually true to the origins.

Neil Gaiman: I think the joy of being a writer is you use whatever you need for the story that you're on. The only rules are the ones that make that story work. I wrote a bunch of classical wumpires in the new book, Fortunately, the Milk, and wrote a dozen different kinds of vampire in a short story called Fifteen Painted Cards From a Vampire Tarot, with SF, fantasy and horror backgrounds.

Will Lincoln be in it?
by the_humeister

I'll only watch if the main character is a popular dead president.

Michael Reaves: Yes, Lincoln will be in it. He'll even have his big ol' shotgun axe. Happy now? (And people wonder why I didn't want studio interference ...)

by DocGerbil100

The Kickstarter page asks for $50K, but considering the apparent costs usually involved in making anything other than the smallest-scale movies, as well as the references in the text of your KS pitch regarding venture capital, I'd like to know how much you *actually* need to get this film made and distributed.

David Raiklen: Please check out our stretch goals on the KS front page. The first goal is to see if there's fan interest, and we are so grateful that you guys want to see this movie! We can make and distribute a good movie for about 200k and hopefully all from fan support.

Abuse of Kickstarter
by Anonymous Coward

Given that you have access to the Hollywood funding machine, why should you be using Kickstarter to fund this project? Shouldn't Kickstarter be used for people who have a good idea but don't have those industry connections? Do you worry that this will dilute the pool for indy film makers who have no other options?

David Raiklen: Actually, KS reports smaller projects get more funding when there's a bigger project active at the same time. The old studios just aren't making many movies and are following formulas more than ever. We've all backed indie films by first time filmmakers and encourage you to try it too. There's room for everyone, and if we protect the open nature of crowdfunding, more freedom for all creators.

by AmiMoJo

Will Amber Benson be singing? Some of us have been waiting a long time for the debut album but will take what we can get.

Amber Benson: I will be singing for sure! I've been relegated to my shower for most of my singing days post Buffy, so Michael asking me to actually sing in front of human beings/vampires was both titillating and frightening.

Re:My question
by Anonymous Coward

Tara was a very popular character particularly in the geek/nerd community. Do you think that character would have been as accepted if she was a gay man instead of a lesbian?

Amber Benson: I think it would've been accepted, for sure. I know that Tom Lenk has experienced the same love and affection from the geek/nerd community that I have - though his character's homosexuality was more implied than 'out in front' on screen in the show. The Buffy fans are an amazing group: smart, aware and open - less judgmental about our character's sexual preferences.

by Anonymous Coward

From the webpage it sounds like you don't relish the idea of acting Neil. What made you decide to do it and what is Mr. Reaves holding over you?

Neil Gaiman: What first attracted me to the project was Michael telling me he'd written a part for me. And that it wasn't a writer. (I've played lots of variants on myself now, which is fun, but isn't challenging.)

American Gods HBO series
by wynterwynd

Hi Neal - first off I want to say I'm a huge admirer and I can't wait to see you in Nashville this July! That being said, the tour is billed as the "Last US Signing Tour". Say it ain't so! My question: With the upcoming "American Gods" project for HBO, how much creative control do you have over the direction of series? Is there a firm beginning and an end to the story arc, as with the novel, or do you have to keep things open for possible future seasons? Blood Kiss sounds interesting due to the sheer creativity pool involved, although I think the vampire genre is getting a bit washed thin and fraying at the cuffs lately. Hopefully this approach will be sufficiently unique as to revitalize it (entendré completely intended).

Neil Gaiman: Right now I'm just waiting to find out if they like the pilot script. I'll worry about the rest of the things when the pilot episode gets approved.

Series Vs. Movie
by Anonymous Coward

I think the success of Game of Thrones and the fact that most successful Sci-fi or fantasy films unfold over multiple movies shows that people want to get to know characters on a personal level more now than before. Do you think it's still possible to tell a great story with fleshed out characters in two hours or less?

Michael Reaves: Yes; if I didn't I wouldn't be trying to do it. True, TV lends itself better to the "Novel for TV" format -sometimes. But sometimes the series doesn't have enough story to fulfill its time slot commitment, and it gets bloated and boring (yeah, I'm looking at you, Smallville).

Amber Benson: I do think it's possible to tell a great story in two hours. It's just harder than doing it in a serialized/television fashion because people really want to delve into the interior lives of the characters they watch - which is easier to do in a non-film (2 hour) format. I loved the first Matrix movie - I think it stands on its own - sure, it's part of a trilogy, but for me, that first one says it all.

cancel ×


Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

I like the end best (1)

For a Free Internet (1594621) | about a year ago | (#43851561)

Where they all are vampores. Sort of like where the train leaves the station and everyone is like, what? Pluss all the silly punctuation is detractive to the story, in your COMPUTER.

So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (1)

magic maverick (2615475) | about a year ago | (#43851639)

The answer to the overdone question was disappointing. Vampires are overdone. And these vampires aren't even going to be supernatural, so what's the point? Just make a decent detective story and be done with it.

Of course, I'm not going to watch (let alone pay to watch) this movie anyway, so don't pay any attention to me. (There's too much other media around. I'm thinking of watching Babylon 5, is it any good? How does it compare to Farscape (almost finished the first season)? Or to the newer Doc Who?)

Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (3, Insightful)

neminem (561346) | about a year ago | (#43851757)

B5 started out awful, got fantastic after about half season, and stayed that way for the rest of its run. Farscape started out fun, was fun for a couple seasons, then seriously lost its way, and was pretty mediocre for the rest of its run (YMMV on that one, some people thought it was all good. I didn't.) Your mileage will *definitely* vary on new DW; some people think the more recent seasons were good. I have no idea why; they're mind-numbingly terrible. Seasons 1-4 of new DW were fantastic, though.Anything else you want opinions on? :p

Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (0)

magic maverick (2615475) | about a year ago | (#43852145)

Thanks for the opinions.
<joke>I'm trying to use the command line more, which is the better editor, Vim or Emacs?</joke>

Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (1)

neminem (561346) | about a year ago | (#43852191)

Nano [] !

Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (1)

magic maverick (2615475) | about a year ago | (#43852419)

Yeah, sorry, but obviously the answer is Vim. Nano, Pico and similar are obviously not good options, they are sort of like Notepad, limited and just a little brain-dead. Moreover, Vi is required part for a system to be POSIX compliant. So, learning Vi (and you can quickly learn the direction keys by playing a little Nethack) will mean that you'll always have an editor on a Unix system.


Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (1)

neminem (561346) | about a year ago | (#43852645)

I almost said notepad. :p

Honestly, I *like* my text editors braindead. If I want a full-blown IDE, I'll use an actual IDE. Notepad is just a little *too* braindead: chokes and hangs on files larger than a couple megs, gets confused by *nix newlines, etc. But in general, I *like* things to be simple when the task I'm going for (like "edit a text file") is a simple one.

Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (1)

firex726 (1188453) | about a year ago | (#43851765)

> I'm thinking of watching Babylon 5, is it any good?
Yea I'm going to need you to turn in your geek card by the end of the day.


Like most scifi shows the first season is pretty meh, it has to take time to setup the universe, the characters, etc... It's more political than Farscape, and much more serious than Doctor Who.

It's hard to explain without giving away too much; but it chronicles a war between several alien races. It's worth it just to see G'Kar and Londo play off each other.

Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (2)

magic maverick (2615475) | about a year ago | (#43852105)

Why the fuck should I turn in my "geek card"?! Because I grew up reading rather than watching (there wasn't even a TV in the house half my childhood, and when there was (which wasn't a continues stretch, but more, 1 year on, 1 year off sort of thing) it was incapable of getting more than three or four channels, none of which would have shown American SciFi? (Funny, we had at least one computer in the house for most of my childhood though.) Or because I still prefer a good book? You know there are loads of sorts of geeks right. Next you'll be telling me that I'm not a geek 'cause I've never bothered to watch even a single episode of Star Trek. (I got that once from someone who wasn't a geek.)

Books: SF&F (mainly SF), computers & programming, gaming: RPG and table-top (if there was a group around), and other geeky pursuits are more than sufficient to mean I'll be keeping my "geek card" thank you very much! (Yeah, it was a joke. I know.)

I guess I'll watch a little B5, just to see whether I think I'd appreciate it.

Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (1)

cyberchondriac (456626) | about a year ago | (#43853995)

Wow. I've never seen anyone so offended from a perceived accusation of not being a geek. Come out of the closet already, we know you're really an NFL linebacker, you drive a hummer, prefer jerky to nachos, eschew Axe deodorant, and you get laid 6 nights a week by various models.. the other night you're busy arm wrestling bears while mountain climbing.

Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (1)

magic maverick (2615475) | about a year ago | (#43854357)

Meh, I don't even know what NFL is. I don't drive (I ride). Nachos are nice I guess, but there's better food (and it's not nachos). I don't use deodorant, I share daily. I get laid only sometimes. And I wear climbing boots in the machine room, because you can never be sure that a mountain won't spring up out of the floor.

I do get pissed off by geeks being elitist and saying that others (including girls and women) aren't geeks because they don't like the 'right' thing, or don't watch the 'right' thing. Geeks are varied. By saying you have to watch TV, you not only get rid of people like me, but you get rid of various other geeks who also don't like TV, but are huge geeks all the same.

Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (1)

halcyon1234 (834388) | about a year ago | (#43866123)

No, you should turn in your geek card for your horrific abuse of parentheses.

Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (1)

magic maverick (2615475) | about a year ago | (#43867281)

Can't handle a little bit of stuff (is it too much stuff?) in just a few (or is it too many) parenthesis? I bet you would hate Lisp if you ever used it. Besides, I didn't even nest parenthesis in that post. (ESR[1] says that hackers tend to nest parenthesis when writing (like this). I do that, and I'm not even a hacker.)
Anyway, how is it an abuse? I'm just using them as intended (to mark an area of text that could be removed, and the rest of the text would still make sense).

[1] []

Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (1)

halcyon1234 (834388) | about a year ago | (#43867311)

Overuse, and you forgot to close one of your nested ones. You're fired.

Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (1)

DNS-and-BIND (461968) | about a year ago | (#43851791)

The best part was where he said "The old studios just aren't making many movies and are following formulas more than ever" without any trace of irony. I used to think that the "doublethink" part of 1984 (thought marked by the acceptance of gross contradictions and falsehoods) was a dumb and unrealistic part of an otherwise chilling novel. I feel like Orwell outsmarted me now.

Bad, bad feeling about this one. (1)

khasim (1285) | about a year ago | (#43853323)

From their answers:

Michael Reaves: ... I can't really comment on the "Twinkleteeth" style of vamps, because I haven't seen any, ...

It's only the most successful vampire franchise at the moment.

David Raiklen: It's time to give old myths a new spin.

Look at the book sales and movies. There are easily a THOUSAND different interpretations of vampires out there right now. What will be different about YOUR "spin" that hasn't been done over and over already?

Michael Reaves: Well, how about just plain people, instead of overblown Transylvanian counts?

You mean like in every vampire story EXCEPT Dracula?

David Raiklen: ... And there's nothing supernatural about our vampires.

So you'll have a different origin story for the first vampire and they won't have a problem with crosses and they will reflect in mirrors and so on.

Unless they don't reflect in mirrors in which case you'll have to explain how a non-supernatural (does that make it natural?) breaks the laws of physics.

Re:So, overdone and unnecessary vampires. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43857087)

Babylon 5 takes part of the first season to get started, but it becomes riveting stuff for seasons 2 to 4. Season 5 gets variable reactions. Each season feels like a book in a series - while it's self-contained, it's also part of the whole.

Michael S has explained that he plotted the major arcs over five seasons, but got told to finish it in four, so he compressed it. Then they got the fifth season, and had to come up with new material.

Last time I watched B5, I watched only seasons 1 to 4, and that felt better.

The add-on movies are optional, but interesting (except for the movie that acts at pilot for Crusade). The spin-off series Crusade is not as good - not surprising it got cancelled.

There are some interesting new TV series you might consider, too. Continuum is OK, for example.

Vampire Q&A (2)

PPH (736903) | about a year ago | (#43851659)

Slashdot is now a teen chat board?

Re:Vampire Q&A (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43851801)

Slashdot is now a teen chat board?

That would be an improvement.

The Count (1)

westlake (615356) | about a year ago | (#43852323)

Slashdot is now a teen chat board?

The audience for the classic vampire story was not teen-age. Immortality at a price. Sexual license at a price.

It is hard to believe now, but there was a time when moviegoers did not know about vampires. Didn't know you do them in with a wooden stake through the heart, didn't know a ray of sunlight is injurious to their health, that they sleep in coffins all day and go about at night as bats and wolves. Didn't even know they drink the blood!

All that changed in a single magnificent cinematic achievement. The English solicitor has come by stagecoach past peasants fearfully crossing themselves and up a Mittel-Europa mountain-pass road to a castle of shattered and decayed battlements. On a grand staircase within, the unknown nobleman who has requested his presence awaits.

The accent of that menacing welcomer, his pauses and intonation, the graceful and slow hand motions, aristocratic bearing, formal white-tie wear with sash and raised-collar cape---does there exist a kid today who has not seen and heard and understood it all, in Saturday-morning cartoons, on cereal boxes, in television ads, comic books, greeting cards, toys, paint kits, plastic representations, Halloween costumes complete with gleaming fangs?

And who inspired all of this? Well, can you name a king off the top of your head? Of course you can: Richard III, Henry VIII, John, Edward VII. A czar? Peter, Nicholas II. A prince? Hamlet, Charles. A duke? Wellington. Now---quick---a count? Who comes to mind? What, Tolstoy ? Marie Antoinetteâ(TM)s boyfriend Axel Fersen? Monte Cristo? Please. There's only one count.

''I am Dracula. I bid you ... velcome.''

Lugosi was fascinating, showing in poetic manner a soulless being, forsaken even as he is satanically deadly. From the stage version came the 1931 movie, which saved Universal from Depression bankruptcy. Can anyone forget ''Listen to them, the children of the night'' as the count hears the dark cries of tortured beings he has made undead, as he is himself? ''What music they make!''

The Count [] [1998]

Re:Vampire Q&A (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43853279)

Most who watched Buffy as teens are now old. Many in the nerdy & science related fields.

Re:Vampire Q&A (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43853837)

So are those who started out watching Barney the Dinosaur.


Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43851675)

SMG got old fast !!

LLLLiterally !!

Not sure... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43851725)

that Neil Gaiman and Amber Benson couldn't of come up with the money by just schmoozing some movie execs. If it's about no producers influencing production, umm ok, but the last time I saw a movie where the producer was also the director was Birdemic: Shock and Terror. TV shows don't seem to have that limitation though. (eg. Walking Dead and Frank Darabont) *shrug* Oh well, it's kickstarter, it's not like I'm deciding to invest my life savings into a start-up company.

And there's nothing supernatural about our vampire (1)

Princeofcups (150855) | about a year ago | (#43851785)

Sorry, that's not a vampire then. A superficial emo-goth archetype maybe, but not a vampire.

Re:And there's nothing supernatural about our vamp (2)

Intrepid imaginaut (1970940) | about a year ago | (#43851867)

Yeah vampires need to be afraid of religious icons. I'll always remember that scene in Salem's Lot where the vampire challenges the priest to get into a faith-off, then crushes the crucifix. Powerful stuff.

Re:And there's nothing supernatural about our vamp (1)

Shadowmist (57488) | about a year ago | (#43924933)

Yeah vampires need to be afraid of religious icons. I'll always remember that scene in Salem's Lot where the vampire challenges the priest to get into a faith-off, then crushes the crucifix. Powerful stuff.

I prefer the interpretation in Vamps comic series. One person totally fails to ward off the fanged biker chicks because he really didn't have faith in what the cross symbolized and it didn't even slow them down. An Amerind shaman apprentice falls when his raging hormones win out over the teachings of his master, and a Manhattan homeless man manages to totally hold off the vamps with a Chevrolet hub cap because of his total belief in it's warding power. In that story, it's not the icon, it's the sincere faith (or lack of it) that you put behind it.

Re:And there's nothing supernatural about our vamp (1)

magic maverick (2615475) | about a year ago | (#43851917)

What if it's like: "There's nothing supernatural about our zombies." "They just have this virus that makes them crave." "Brainz."
So: "There's nothing supernatural about our vampires." "They just have this virus that makes them crave." "Blood. Or, you know, money." Sucking the life blood of our community. You mean that money is the life blood of your community? Yes. Damn vampires.

er (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43851987)

That sounds silly. Why do vampires have to be supernatural? They could easily be mundane; a "scifi"-style vampire that's a genetic mutation ... porphyric hemophilia, intense sunlight allergy, throw in some fangs, uncommon strength, and maybe even an extended lifespan, and you've got a vampire that's not undead, magical, cursed, or any "supernatural" quality beyond "improbable".

Of course if this is a story about people who dress in black, wear fangs, and hang out at sad clubs ... well, those aren't vampires by any definition.

Sold (2)

AmiMoJo (196126) | about a year ago | (#43852139)

Amber Benson singing? Sold.

Seriously, it was really nice to hear natural singing voices on Buffy. Not just Amber, the whole cast. What struck me the most was how apparent it was that Amber and Anthony were both passionate about singing and enjoyed it. For some reason actors who also sing tend to me more like that... It's hard to explain but Hugh Laurie is the same.

Re:Sold (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43852569)

I love her voice, and I was even more sold on the idea with the 'in the shower' bit.

Re:Sold (1)

retchdog (1319261) | about a year ago | (#43863015)

yeah, everyone except for smg. i call that episode "buffy the autotune slayer."

Kickstarter vs VC (1)

prestonmichaelh (773400) | about a year ago | (#43852163)

I think the interesting thing that seems to go somewhat unmentioned is that the main advantage of funding via Kickstarter vs vc or the industry is that with Kickstarter, worst case you just have to give out swag (t-shirts, dvds, etc.) that you can factor the costs into your fund raising.

With vc or industry funding, they are going to expect a percentage of the profits or gross. What I would like to see is a Kickstarter where if you fund above a certain level, you get a certain percentage of profits (even if it is really small).

Re:Kickstarter vs VC (1)

stdarg (456557) | about a year ago | (#43853523)

My thoughts exactly. I'm done with Kickstarter until they offer equity stakes.

Kickstarter is a great idea, and I've participated a handful of times (and gotten burned). But at this point it leans too much towards charity and good will.

What? Another one? (1)

nanospook (521118) | about a year ago | (#43852173)

This is when I recall it really first took off.. almost 20 years ago. I like the idea of that American God's series though :) []

Overblown Transylvanian Counts? (1)

Graydyn Young (2835695) | about a year ago | (#43852239)

Who among the recent glut of vampires was an "overblown Transylvanian count"? All the vampire fiction that we've been swamped with lately has been of the dangerous but sexy 20-something variety. Or as I call it, the Ann Rice Archetype.

Re:Overblown Transylvanian Counts? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43852367)

depending on your definition of "recent", Blade and Underworld vampires both kinda fit this bill .. course that was the last time i actually gave a shit about movies involving vampires .. not a big shit mind you

Detective story (2)

RoccamOccam (953524) | about a year ago | (#43852603)

Blood Kiss is as much detective story as vampire tale and that is new.

The Night Stalker (1972) []

Re:Detective story (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#43853351)

Forever Knight (1992-1996) [] []

Re:Detective story (1)

alexander_686 (957440) | about a year ago | (#43853957)

Have you read the story about the young British boy, who was kind of an outcast and wore glasses, who one day was informed that he was destined to be a great wielder of magic for good?

Gaiman wrote that story 7 years before Rowling. Does he feel he was ripped off? No. There are only so many stories out there, and everybody cribs off of everybody else. Look at Shakespeare – hard to find an original idea in any of his plays. What differs bad plagiarized works and brilliant works is the execution.

Here is Gaiman's take – it the second part of the blog post. []

Re:Detective story (1)

khasim (1285) | about a year ago | (#43854155)

But Gaiman never claimed that it was "new". And I'm sure that if you asked him he could give you a dozen or more references that he pulled from for that.

The problem is when you take something as obvious (and done multiple times) as a detective story with supernatural elements and call it "new". It shows a lack of research.

There's even a TVTropes page dedicated to the sub-genre of detective-vampire. []

Re:Detective story (1)

RoccamOccam (953524) | about a year ago | (#43854251)

Actually, I wasn't even thinking of "vampire as detective" when I mentioned "The Night Stalker". However, for a *very* relevant example of that genre, I present Angel (1999) [] .

Re:Detective story (1)

khasim (1285) | about a year ago | (#43856281)

And if it's about "detective investigates X and finds vampire" then there's even more stuff out there.

But it wasn't a real vampire. Just someone faking it for an alibi or an insane guy who believed he was. But it wasn't a real vampire.


Or WAS it?!?

Anyway, how about a list of clichés that you do NOT want to see in a vampire movie? Mine are:
1. Vampires dress normally. NOT like they just left the fetish party.
2. Vampirism that does NOT seem like most of the people in the world would prefer that to their current existence.
3. The vampire "lives" in a place that seems reasonable. NOT a castle or a mansion that looks like a castle. People tend to inquire as to who owns huge estates.

WereMonkey Vampire Zombie Pirate Ninjas (1)

VortexCortex (1117377) | about a year ago | (#43856533)

So, when the vampires bite you...
Yeah, I guess it's some kind of pathogen or something.
And that gives you powers while weakening you? You said that about Werewolves... and Zombies too.
Well, I guess we've got a deep seated racial fear of being bitten and getting sick. Probably for good for evolution or something.

Ah, that explains the monkey-virus epidemic films. So, Evil Robots?
Fear of things that are different? Perhaps folks are afraid of being replaced or destroyed by their own creations.
Like Frankenstein's Monster? But, haven't all the advancements of mankind been net positives?
Well, yeah, sort of. Nobody said we're a rational race.

You said it, not me! Still doesn't explain the aversion to Aliens though.
Humans suck at ethics and logistics. Most folks don't know nebulas are much easier to mine for resources.
Those that do get the vastness and beauty of space aren't scared of it: I see it as a sea of endless opportunities.
Alien invasion is a fear of having stuff taken from us, or becoming extinct. "Sharing" movies doesn't sell tickets.

Yes, I see. Pirates kill and steal to live too. So they're also villains. Cultural revisions of Ninjas? They both have swords...
Well, pirates are portrayed as brutes. Ninja are both feared and respected for their skills. They're like silent death for hire.
There's a primal fear of the dark itself there, and what lurks within the dark: "Things that go bump in the night".

Ghosts! I knew it was something to do with your sleep cycle and lack of alertness.
That one was just too strange to be anything else but random synapse firing in a dream.
But not you? You're not scared?

Hell no! Ever since I was a kid I rooted for the misunderstood "monsters".
Look, I can explain all the RF transmissions later, after we've gotten the hell off this primitive rock!

"Hell" That's an embodiment of your fear of death?
No, that's a place stupid people fear. Stories like those helped create order when laws and superstition were one and the same.
The average level of ignorance among Earth's people is what scares me the most.

Come on! Abduct Me Already!

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?