Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Researchers Implant False Memories In Mice

samzenpus posted about a year ago | from the remember-this dept.

Science 102

sciencehabit writes "Call it 'Total Recall' for mice. A group of neuroscientists say that they've identified a potential mechanism of false memory creation and have planted such a memory in the brain of a mouse. With this knowledge, neuroscientists can start to figure out how many neurons it takes to give us the perception of what's around us and what goes on in our neural wiring when we remember—or misremember—the past."

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Download complete (5, Funny)

NoMoreMrNiceGuy2 (2989999) | about a year ago | (#44389329)

I know kung fu.

Re:Download complete (4, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389363)

You remember the spider that lived in a bush outside your window? Orange body, green legs?

Tablet to PC's mouse (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44390727)

"Get your ass to Mars."

Your comment isn't quite there, Rachel was a replicant. Not just her dreams but her very DNA were artificial.

Re:Tablet to PC's mouse (1)

Jeremiah Cornelius (137) | about a year ago | (#44396087)

This is not the Cheese you're looking for.

"The secret is, there is no Cheese..."

Re:Download complete (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389379)

I had no upbringing, i watched people making errors.

Re:Download complete (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389607)

Hey Ed, look at this. The brain in jar #614 actually thinks it's watching people. Let's tell it it had no upbringing.

Dear Mr. President (1)

smitty_one_each (243267) | about a year ago | (#44389671)

As with your economic stylings, this purported knowledge isn't going to last too well past the first encounter with reality. You should have listened to Moltke [wikipedia.org] , not Marx.

Re:Download complete (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389719)

Me: Why Hello Kokgobbler!

You: Gobble... Gobble... Gobble...

Me: Allllllllllllllright then! (Exits stage left.)

You: Gobble... Gobble... Gobble... Gobble... Gobble... Gobble... Gobble... Gobble... Gobble...

SQUEAK! (1)

Greyfox (87712) | about a year ago | (#44390247)

Get your ass to mars!

No they didn't (3, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389373)

They hijacked the mouse's senses to perceive the room as a different one while being shocked, causing the mouse to be afraid of the wrong room. Interesting, but not a false memory.

Re:No they didn't (4, Interesting)

DaemonDan (2773445) | about a year ago | (#44389701)

Agreed. I'm not convinced they didn't just condition the mouse to fear that room by forcing an association of that room and pain, similar to me showing you a picture of Beiber and hitting you with a stick until every time you see a picture of him you cringe (maybe that's a bad example).

Regardless, it is pretty interesting that they could pin-point the precise location where the memory of the room was stored and force that negative association at the neuronal level. Not quite an implanted memory, but still cool.

Re:No they didn't (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389795)

Most people don't need to be conditioned to be afraid of being hit.

Re: No they didn't (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389879)

Most people don't need to be conditioned to cringe at Bieber.

Re: No they didn't (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44391329)

When was I hit with a stick?

Re:No they didn't (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44390491)

Interesting how you thought the "experiment" was about conditioning a person to be afraid of being hit by a stick by associating the act with Justin Bieber, as opposed to being about conditioning a person to be afraid of Justin Bieber by associating his picture with being hit by a stick.

Of course, I thought the experiment was about conditioning the person to like Justin Bieber. But then, I'm a masochist. ;)

Re:No they didn't (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389871)

There was a third room where the fear reaction did not take place.

Re:No they didn't (1)

amiga3D (567632) | about a year ago | (#44389977)

Now I know why I scream every time I hear The Beeb.

Re:No they didn't (2)

umafuckit (2980809) | about a year ago | (#44390759)

Did you read article to which the (poor and short) summary links? The whole point is that they create a fear response in a situation where there previously wasn't one. In other words, they control for the concern you raise and it's a non-issue. I know there are some crappy papers in Science, but concerns as glaring as the one you cite are going to be controlled for. In this case there is a third context.

Re:No they didn't (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44390933)

You don't get it, do you? The point is, the mouse was shown an image of the room (through a neural trick), while receiving pain. Thus, it connected pain with the room it sensed, instead of the one it was actually in. This is not false memory, this is false reality.

Re:No they didn't (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44391037)

As William James wrote: "The only proof of there being retention is that recall actually takes place". So, if the animal changes his behavior to a specific room, you can say that he has a memory regarding said room.

In this experiment, they are investigating associative memory. They created an association, so they created a new (false memory).

As a memory researcher (first author here: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1074742706000761), I have no problem with the claim of this being a false memory.

Re:No they didn't (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44391867)

Agreed. I'm not convinced they didn't just condition the mouse to fear that room by forcing an association of that room and pain, similar to me showing you a picture of Beiber and hitting you with a stick until every time you see a picture of him you cringe (maybe that's a bad example).

Regardless, it is pretty interesting that they could pin-point the precise location where the memory of the room was stored and force that negative association at the neuronal level. Not quite an implanted memory, but still cool.
Reply to This Parent Share

Good, But Let's Make It BETTER...similar to me showing you a picture of Beiber every-time you cum until every time you see a picture of him you cum (okay, maybe that's a bad example)

Captcha was mortify........

Welcome to the dollhouse (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389387)

Squeak squeak squeak squeak squeak
Translation: Did I fall asleep?

Who cut the cheese (1)

tepples (727027) | about a year ago | (#44390441)

So how do you ask "Who cut the cheese supply to Station C?" in mouse?

Espionage (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389431)

It never really happened. Or did it?

And the memory said... (2)

FriendlyLurker (50431) | about a year ago | (#44389433)

"you are a chicken, you were born a chicken, and when you were but a little chick you watched a big spider with an orange body and green legs. You watched her build her web, then one day there's a big egg in it. The egg hatched and a hundred baby spiders came out... and you ate them all."

Re:And the memory said... (1)

PolygamousRanchKid (1290638) | about a year ago | (#44389505)

"More mouse than mouse" is our motto.

But how will a mouse say, "I want more life, fucker!" . . . ?

Re:And the memory said... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389587)

"Squeek!"

Re:And the memory said... (1)

Chris Mattern (191822) | about a year ago | (#44390747)

To which the reply will be: SQUEAK. [imageshack.us]

The egg hatched... (5, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389449)

Deckard: Remember when you were six? You and your brother snuck into an empty building through a basement window. You were going to play doctor. He showed you his, but when it got to be your turn you chickened and ran; you remember that? You ever tell anybody that? Your mother, Tyrell, anybody? Remember the spider that lived outside your window? Orange body, green legs. Watched her build a web all summer, then one day there's a big egg in it. The egg hatched...
Rachael: The egg hatched...
Deckard: Yeah...
Rachael: ...and a hundred baby spiders came out... and they ate her.

Re:The egg hatched... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44390037)

Thanks, since this is /. no one knows that quote, let alone the movie where it is from. Next up: a quote from Star Wars.

Re:The egg hatched... (1)

camperdave (969942) | about a year ago | (#44390169)

Thanks, since this is /. no one knows that quote, let alone the movie where it is from. Next up: a quote from Star Wars.

*Meekly raises hand*
I, um... I had to look it up.

Re:The egg hatched... (2)

ulatekh (775985) | about a year ago | (#44390811)

*Meekly raises hand*
I, um... I had to look it up.

Ooooh...we'll have to punch a hole out of your nerd card.

Re:The egg hatched... (1)

gorzek (647352) | about a year ago | (#44391507)

GET OUT

Re:The egg hatched... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44392053)

lol

(actually laughed out loud, didn't just type it)

Re:The egg hatched... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44390921)

Why is everyone quoting Blade Runner when they should be quoting Total Recall?

Howser: "Drive! Just Drive!"
Deep Space Nine doctor: "I'm sorry, could you repeat the destination?"

HHGTG (5, Funny)

rossdee (243626) | about a year ago | (#44389453)

So the mice thought they were supervising a computer program to find the ultimate question of Life the Universe and Everything

Re:HHGTG (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389511)

are they sure the mice didnt implant a flase memory of the researchers implanting a false memory?

Ive never been to mars!

Re:HHGTG (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389567)

get your ass to mars

Re:HHGTG (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389709)

WE MUST GO DEEPER.

Re:HHGTG (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389873)

We may have to blast!

The Matrix (2)

Vandil X (636030) | about a year ago | (#44389461)

Well, so restarts the philosophical arguments raised after the original Matrix film came out. You "know" only what your sensory inputs tell you! Is your sensors are being spoofed, may it be a nice steak.

Re:The Matrix (3, Funny)

Stivers Elizabeth (2862807) | about a year ago | (#44389473)

I don't care about philosophy. I just wanna learn Kung Fu.

Re:The Matrix (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389529)

He couldnt learn kung fu that way , that knowledge is built from muscle memory and he would have to practice.
Sorry you will just have to leave the basement and join the jocks.

Re:The Matrix (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389637)

Aham. And where do you think muscle memory is stored? In the most inner layers of your heart?

Re:The Matrix (4, Informative)

Muad'Dave (255648) | about a year ago | (#44389775)

And where do you think muscle memory is stored?

The memories themselves may be stored in the brain, but what you'd be missing from the Kung-Fu download would be the proprioception [wikipedia.org] mapping for your body. If the original Kung-Fu masters musculature and limb lengths were very much different from the learner, the learner would be more likely to beat himself to death than anyone else.

Re:The Matrix (1)

drinkypoo (153816) | about a year ago | (#44390121)

All nervous tissue performs processing. Perhaps there is another kind of learning we haven't yet quantitated.

Stop trying to hit me and hit me (1)

tepples (727027) | about a year ago | (#44390635)

That's what the sparring scene in the dojo construct was about: allowing Neo's brain to adapt the generic martial arts programs to his own body.

Re:The Matrix (1)

Agent0013 (828350) | about a year ago | (#44390743)

But you can really get better at physical activity by imagining yourself doing it. Bowling, pool, darts etc. Imagine yourself playing a full game and doing great every day and you will get better at it.

Re:The Matrix (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44396975)

I love how people take a fictional scenario and say why it would not work in the real world.

No proprioception in the download? Obviously the super smart programmers in The Matrix (FICTION) learned how to record the Kung Fu in a generalized way so the user could implement the techniques scaled properly to their body.

In the real world, humans are not a good source of electricity. In the real world...

Re:The Matrix (1)

Pr0methean (2999801) | about a year ago | (#44409573)

I love how people take a fictional scenario and say why it would not work in the real world.

Right, we *know* why it'd be hard in real life, because we *all* know proprioception is highly individualized and not just included in our DNA with the body plan. Didn't they cover *any* motor-cognitive neuroscience in your high-school gym class?</sarcasm>

Re:The Matrix (2)

Immerman (2627577) | about a year ago | (#44390035)

Probably a fair bit is stored in your spinal column - a lot of reflexive actions are processed and reacted to there - for example if you accidentally stick your hand into a hot fire you will probably flinch away before the pain signal reaches your brain. The brain-hand neural transmission delay is about 1/8 of a second, so taking the round trip so would mean your hand had been in the fire for 1/4 second, plus however long it took for your brain to process the input and decide on a course of action. Those kind of delays are unacceptable for damage avoidance.

Not that I can think of any reason you couldn't program spinal neurons as "easily" as you could program brain neurons, but that giant steel rod inserted into your skull is unlikely to be of any use in the process.

Re:The Matrix (1)

jellomizer (103300) | about a year ago | (#44390703)

Muscle memory is still in your brain. However the real issue is you know Kung Fu. But your mussels haven't gotten their proper exercise. So you will probably end up hurting yourself.

Re:The Matrix (1)

jd2112 (1535857) | about a year ago | (#44389921)

I don't care about philosophy. I just wanna learn Kung Fu.

Traditionally Kung Fu is is at least as much about philosophy as martial arts.

Obligatory Beavis & Butthead (1)

ulatekh (775985) | about a year ago | (#44390829)

From the "Dream On" episode:

Beavis: "But Master, does not the fire need water too? Does not the mountain need the storm? Does not your scrotum need kicking?"

Re:The Matrix (1)

Threni (635302) | about a year ago | (#44389519)

Er...I think those arguments predate that movie. If we have to limit ourselves to movies any self-respecting nerd would be quoting Dark Star...

Re:The Matrix (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389757)

Er...I think those arguments predate that movie. .

Yes, by about 2,500 years.

Buddhists have been going on about getting beyond one's senses - among others things. Hence the meditation: watch the mind and see how ones senses and perception fool you!

Re:The Matrix (1)

N0Man74 (1620447) | about a year ago | (#44390405)

Er...I think those arguments predate that movie. If we have to limit ourselves to movies any self-respecting nerd would be quoting Dark Star...

Speaking of Star Wars... I haven't read the article, but I assume that they implanted the false memories that the Star Wars had "Episode IV: A New Hope" in the opening of the original release?

This experiment has already been performed rather successfully on nerds, so mice seem like a natural next step.

Re:The Matrix (2)

PolygamousRanchKid (1290638) | about a year ago | (#44389549)

Oh, philosophers have been bantering about this ever since the first one got his PhD and was unemployed for the rest of his life, and had nothing else better to do: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_in_a_vat [wikipedia.org]

In philosophy, the brain in a vat is an element used in a variety of thought experiments intended to draw out certain features of our ideas of knowledge, reality, truth, mind, and meaning. It is based on an idea, common to many science fiction stories, that a mad scientist, machine, or other entity might remove a person's brain from the body, suspend it in a vat of life-sustaining liquid, and connect its neurons by wires to a supercomputer which would provide it with electrical impulses identical to those the brain normally receives. According to such stories, the computer would then be simulating reality (including appropriate responses to the brain's own output) and the person with the "disembodied" brain would continue to have perfectly normal conscious experiences without these being related to objects or events in the real world.

The brain in a vat is a contemporary version of the argument given in Hindu Maya illusion, Plato's Allegory of the Cave, Zhuangzi's "Zhuangzi dreamed he was a butterfly", and the evil demon in René Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy.

Re:The Matrix (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389615)

Ah, the brain in a vat that essentially ends up in the idea that the only real truth is: I think, therefore I am.
That of course assumes that a thought require a medium, something that only holds true in our perceived space.

If you also introduce the concept of being wrong and that someone that is wrong doesn't know that he is wrong. Then you can never prove that a though is correct and the only way to make philosophy (And applied philosophy like math and physics.) relevant again is through pragmatism.

Re:The Matrix (1)

Immerman (2627577) | about a year ago | (#44390123)

>That of course assumes that a thought require a medium, something that only holds true in our perceived space.
Not at all. The statement is not "I have a thought, therefore I am" it's "I think, therefore I am". Thinking, as in proceeding through a sequence of thoughts in a guided manner, is the defining characteristic of a mind. Therefore if you are thinking you must have a mind - i.e. you exist. Of course that says nothing about having a brain or any other medium for the thoughts to occur "in", just that the thoughts themselves constitute a mind, and they cannot logically doubt their own existence.

And you don't even need a concept of being wrong to get stuck - Descartes himself cheated horribly and relied on blind faith to reconnect with the world - He had "a clear and present concept of infinity" Really? And "infinity must stem from god"? And "God is good, therefore he wouldn't deceive me"? How are any of those logical claims?

Re:The Matrix (1)

camperdave (969942) | about a year ago | (#44390201)

Ah, the brain in a vat that essentially ends up in the idea that the only real truth is: I think, therefore I am. That of course assumes that a thought require a medium, something that only holds true in our perceived space.

If you also introduce the concept of being wrong and that someone that is wrong doesn't know that he is wrong. Then you can never prove that a though is correct and the only way to make philosophy (And applied philosophy like math and physics.) relevant again is through pragmatism.

I see.., so, I think I think, therefore I think I am?

Re:The Matrix (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44391265)

Thankfully, from what we now understand of biology, our consciousness/awareness is a consequence of our physical makeup.

Its not "I think, therefore I am" - it is "I am, therefore I think"

Re:The Matrix (1)

ArcadeX (866171) | about a year ago | (#44390985)

Am I the only one that now has the urge to go back and watch Robocop 2?

Re:The Matrix (1)

AmiMoJo (196126) | about a year ago | (#44390045)

The argument pre-dates that movie by hundreds of years. Descartes first suggested it, although originally instead of robots he had an "evil demon" of course. That's where is famous quote "I think, therefore I am" comes from - everything you perceive may be a lie created by the evil demon to fool you, but the one thing you can be certain of is that since you are having that thought your mind must itself exist.

Re:The Matrix (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44390913)

It was raised *way* before the Matrix.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato%27s_Cave

Re:The Matrix (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44391405)

Well, so restarts the philosophical arguments raised after the original Matrix film came out. You "know" only what your sensory inputs tell you! Is your sensors are being spoofed, may it be a nice steak.

I had the exact same thought! Well, nearly the same. In my version of it, there was a deep, disappointed sigh beforehand, the word "bullshit" fit in there somewhere, as did the phrase "trenchcoat-wearing drooling fanboy", and come to think of it, the second and third sentences were read in a sarcastic voice with exaggerated jerkoff gestures. But otherwise, nearly the same!

Bit older than the matrix (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44392113)

The matrix!? Try Aristotle. The Wachowski siblings do not have the collective capacity to even come close to the thoughts of millenia dead philosophers.

They seriously used the SCIENTOLOGY term "engram" (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389487)

"Optogenetic reactivation of memory engram–bearing cells was not only sufficient for the behavioral recall of that memory, but could also serve as a conditioned stimulus for the formation of an associative memory"

Are they mocking Dianetics or legitimising it?

Re:They seriously used the SCIENTOLOGY term "engra (2, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389673)

No. [wikipedia.org]

Re: They seriously used the SCIENTOLOGY term "engr (1)

tepples (727027) | about a year ago | (#44390719)

Dianetics appears to use "engram" to refer to what a mainstream psychologist might describe as engrams of trauma that contribute to PTSD.

Re:They seriously used the SCIENTOLOGY term "engra (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44391135)

That's not right. That's not even wrong.

Preposterous! (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389489)

I remember reading about this technique as a way to make people forget about the horrible events that took place while Bill Gates was president by pretending that Clinton had a second term. Supposedly they'd even found a way to make the Windows login screen embed those memories with those `hidden moire flux' patterns. Oddly enough they've actually kept their word on keeping both the presidency and the moire patterns off of Wikipedia, but I doubt that anyone has forgotten...

I mean... just the look on the Spanish King's face during the state visit, or the vat of mayo... who can forget that?

For the memory of a lifetime... (1)

Andrio (2580551) | about a year ago | (#44389585)

Rekall rekall rekall!

Thanks for the memories! (3, Funny)

Maintenance Goof (1487053) | about a year ago | (#44389597)

Have any of you seen a fellow named Kuato around here?

Re:Thanks for the memories! (2)

chill (34294) | about a year ago | (#44390195)

Screw him! Where's the three-breasted mutant prostitute?

That's Strange... (2)

mrsquid0 (1335303) | about a year ago | (#44389641)

I could have sworn that I already posted a clever reply to this story.

reminds me of the movie total recall (1)

youn (1516637) | about a year ago | (#44389667)

except mars would be a chocolate bar

The NSA are going to love this (2)

LordWabbit2 (2440804) | about a year ago | (#44389681)

The NSA are going to love this! Or maybe they already know how to do it and John Pointdexter and Oliver North really meant it when they kept saying "I have no clear recollection of that." at the Iran Contra [wikipedia.org] trial.

Sounds familiar (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389691)

Isn't this the mainly plot behind Pinky & the Brain?

I for one welcome our new mouse, memory implanted overlords.

hi (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389723)

my co-worker's step-sister makes $83 hourly on the net. She has been discharged for 6 months however last month her pay check was $19589 simply acting on the net for a number of hours. Here's the location to scan additional Read more at... www.bay92.Com

Now... (1)

Dcnjoe60 (682885) | about a year ago | (#44389741)

Now when they can explain the mechanism for the occurance of false memories without having to put electrodes in one's brain that will be real news.

Dupe (2)

PhilHibbs (4537) | about a year ago | (#44389749)

I remember seeing this story before.

Pffftttt.... (1)

CanadianMacFan (1900244) | about a year ago | (#44389761)

Big deal. Politicians have been using this to the voters in order to get re-elected for decades. How else can some of them be doing it?

Inception. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389809)

"I know it can be done.. because i have done it before... on a mouse."

I know kung fu (1)

holophrastic (221104) | about a year ago | (#44389823)

corrected subtitle.

Slashdot sociopaths out in force... (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389845)

... not a single comment of concern for the suffering these animals go through - but then, a sociopath can't feel the suffering of others, he can only PRETEND to feel it, like the majority of the Slashdot posters here.

This 'research' is a massive fraud, because clearly mice brains are completely different to human brains, and it's yet another example of vivisectionists torturing animals for no reason, just so they can get more funding. Just look at the pathetic comments above - not ONE person actually thought, even for a second, about the hell that these animals go through. But then, they're 'just mice', and we sociopathic humans are SO much better than them - after all, WE say so!

Rather like the Jews calling themselves 'God's chosen people' - how modest.

Self praise is no recommendation.

Persuadertron (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44389889)

So, how long until some corp patents the Persuadertron from Syndicate?

raise my little pre-programmed mice army (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44390143)

Doesn't the human brain already do that, we create a false memory in order to solve things. I think it's called thinking.

Yein Group Properties (1)

emlak21 (2997971) | about a year ago | (#44390285)

I think those arguments predate that movie. If we have to limit ourselves to movies any self-respecting nerd would be quoting Dark Star Yein Group Properties http://www.yegingroup.com/ [yegingroup.com]

Wait.. (1)

dgr73 (1055610) | about a year ago | (#44390419)

didn't I already read this bit of news about humans?

Just Think (1)

The Cat (19816) | about a year ago | (#44390521)

When we can fully manipulate the minds of human beings, they'll be able to turn all you atheists into jug-band playing, television contribution pandering, Bible thumping fundamentalist Christians.

And the best part is you won't even remember you were atheists. Shit, we could have 100% church attendance in five years.

Ain't science a bitch?

By the way, this story is a load of shit. They didn't "implant" memories. They tried to activate memories previously memorized, and they ended up with only circumstantial evidence it worked.

But that's okay. Give it ten years and there will be no such thing as the human self any more. Some benevolent scientist will flip a few switches and make you into whatever the hell they want.

The teacher's unions will oppose this (1)

ulatekh (775985) | about a year ago | (#44390881)

If memories can be implanted from outside, then education can be delivered this way, and the services of unionized teachers will no longer be necessary...watch for them to oppose this research and make several ad-hominem attacks on it.

Re:The teacher's unions will oppose this (1)

Zordak (123132) | about a year ago | (#44392275)

If memories can be implanted from outside, then education can be delivered this way, and the services of unionized teachers will no longer be necessary...watch for them to oppose this research and make several ad-hominem attacks on it.

Unionized teachers, no. But there will always be room for real teachers who do something more than raw data transfer.

Ratatouille (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44391055)

Finally, it makes sense how that little bugger learned how to cook!

Ahah! (1)

Jane Q. Public (1010737) | about a year ago | (#44391277)

So THAT'S who moved my cheese!

I'm a slave. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44391319)

I need to obey.

Poyton Rose (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44393419)

my co-worker's step-sister makes $83 hourly on the net. She has been discharged for 6 months however last month her pay check was $19589 simply acting on the net for a number of hours. Here's the location to scan additional
Read more at... www.bay92.Com

Total Recall (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44396197)

Implanting false memories to prevent the mice realising they were really secret agents on Mars.

One of them was even Arnold Schwartzenegger.

i for one (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44409663)

i for one am thankful for this new tool in the worlds struggle against the house of mouse and it's plans to enslave us all into happy happy pg lives.

Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?