Beta

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

LinkedIn Now Targeting Universities, 14-Year-Olds

Soulskill posted about a year ago | from the works-for-pop-music dept.

Social Networks 87

Nerval's Lobster writes "Get 'em young: That could be LinkedIn's new motto, after the professional-networking Website opened itself up to universities and students. LinkedIn's University Pages offer schools a place to post updates about campus news and activities; they can also link to famous alumni, who will doubtlessly love when a couple thousand students try to connect with them all at once. Some 200 universities are setting up LinkedIn Pages, including NYU, the University of Michigan, the University of Illinois, the Rochester Institute of Technology, and more. Why this aggressive expansion into a younger demographic? Today's students are tomorrow's cubicle bees and entrepreneurs; by locking them into the network early, LinkedIn can (at least in theory) maintain a user base for many years to come. (It's safe to presume that at least a fraction of these young users will eventually engage LinkedIn's paid services, which makes this initiative a long-term revenue play.) Building a substantial base among students could also help LinkedIn head off future competition, such as Facebook moving more aggressively into the careers space. Or it could just open a whole lot of concerns over privacy and security, similar to what Facebook already faces with its teen audience."

cancel ×

87 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

So basically... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44624301)

Like Facebook used to be.

Re:So basically... (1)

ackthpt (218170) | about a year ago | (#44624747)

Like Facebook used to be.

You're just jealous that they let in the hoi polloi, when you thought you had it to yourself and a few thousand people.

Just like the good old days of /.

Re:So basically... (1)

Salgak1 (20136) | about a year ago | (#44628775)

. . . .which those of us in the 5-digit club barely remember. Senility, don'tcha know (grin)

Re:So basically... (1)

Bigbutt (65939) | about a year ago | (#44628829)

Hold on, let me turn up my cranial hearing improvement device and adjust my cybereyes.

[John]

They ruined what made it successful already. (5, Insightful)

Above (100351) | about a year ago | (#44624305)

LinkedIn's value early on was that people added their real life connections. It was predicated on someone being a co-worker, or manager, or supplier. When you searched your network what you found was people who knew the actual person, and could vouch for them and/or provide a personal introduction.

As LinkedIn grew this rapidly declined. It started by people accepting requests from folks who were at the same company, but with which they did not interact. It grew when recruiters started friending everyone they contacted so their search network could grow. It jumped the shark when they put buttons that made it way too easy for someone to friend you just because you were in the same LinkedIn group with them, along with 10,000 others. And now, the expansion to students.

I know plenty of people with 1,000+ "friends" on LinkedIn. They don't know even 10% of those people close enough to introduce you, or provide a vouch. As a result, I no longer turn to LinkedIn. Too many of my "can you introduce me to" mails get back a "yeah, I don't really know them" response. There are too many incentives to "grow your network" by adding people you don't know, and not enough incentives to have a high value network, by having it be built on personal relationships.

So the magic is gone. The upward trend might continue a bit longer like a rocket who's motor has burned out as they add students and such, but the ultimate trajectory here is down unless some major course correction, in the form of dumping people you don't know, occurs.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44624405)

Maybe everyone is just snubbing you because you're a douchebag.

Just a thought.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (2)

CanHasDIY (1672858) | about a year ago | (#44624453)

Maybe everyone is just snubbing you because you're a douchebag.

Just a thought.

Nice example of what psychologists refer to as "transference."

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44624779)

Isn't it actually "projection"?

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44626427)

Tu quoque!

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (2)

ahem (174666) | about a year ago | (#44624551)

Why is "Above" a douchebag just because they made a well reasoned conclusion based on clear-eyed observation of empirically verifiable data? I've seen similar examples and trends. I would tend to disagree with the conclusion that the motor is burnt out, but I do agree that LinkedIn has entered a different trajectory as far as growth and the value of being part of the network. As a hiring manager I still use it to kick off searches, but I rely much more on face to face networking & direct requests of my network.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (2)

istartedi (132515) | about a year ago | (#44624745)

No. He pretty much nailed it. I would have said essentially the same thing; but I think I tweeted something along those lines a while ago like...

"Everybody is linked to everybody else. We don't need LinkedIn to know that".

OK, here it is... (2)

istartedi (132515) | about a year ago | (#44624781)

Everybody on #LinkedIn [twitter.com] has endorsed everybody for everything.

— æoeéè æ¥æ (@istartedi) May 7, 2013 [twitter.com]

The aforementioned tweet.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44624943)

Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
They think it don't be like it is,
But it do.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (4, Insightful)

avandesande (143899) | about a year ago | (#44625067)

I have found exactly the opposite- people endorsing me that know nothing about my skills, which makes me very suspicious of other peoples endorsements.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (3, Insightful)

matthewv789 (1803086) | about a year ago | (#44627339)

I totally agree, recommendations are one thing, but the endorsements are worthless, 95% of the people who have given me endorsements could not possibly know in the slightest what I'm good at in terms of those skills. What happens is Linkedin gives them a prompt occasionally to "Endorse so-and-so for this skill" and they click "ok".

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (1)

Bigbutt (65939) | about a year ago | (#44628839)

There's even a "Endorse all?" button.

I've only been endorsing the folks I know who actually do the work. Not what they're doing right now.

[John]

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (3, Funny)

hoggoth (414195) | about a year ago | (#44631719)

After people I've never met or worked with starting endorsing me for skills they can't even pronounce I added the skill 'cromulence' as a honey-pot.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (1)

gsslay (807818) | about a year ago | (#44628195)

Yup. Happens to me. People have good intentions, but they're endorsing me for things that they think I do, but I don't. Just another facet of being a techie, a lot of your colleagues only have the sketchiest of ideas of how you accomplish things.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (1)

parkinglot777 (2563877) | about a year ago | (#44628933)

I believe that the endorsing email sent to you is actually another type of spam from LinkedIn. It is similar to those invitation emails. I have 2 different email addresses that I am using for different purposes, and one is registered to LinkedIn for years. I never tie these 2 address together (not in each other's contact list). Then a year ago, my friend got an invitation email from LinkedIn from someone else and he registered with the LinkedIn. His email is tied to my email address which is not registered to LinkedIn. All the sudden, I got an invitation email from him through LinkedIn in the email (the one which is not registered). The email kept coming at least 3 times within a week. So LinkedIn turns itself into a spammer. Watch out now. If you registered with LinkedIn, it will take all the contacts in your email and send this kind of spam email to every email address in the contact that is not registered with them.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (1)

Em Adespoton (792954) | about a year ago | (#44624505)

I still have a high value network of around 200 people.

I DO wish that LinkedIn would let you indicate WHEN you knew your contacts though... when you needed to link the connection to the employment position you held at the time, that was sort-of there, but after the "group links" took hold, this became impossible to mine for your own contacts, let alone others' contacts. My 200 list still has people on it that I haven't talked to in 5-10 years.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (1)

lightknight (213164) | about a year ago | (#44624811)

Hmm. I'd have a different worry -> with LinkedIn, the possibility of dead information, over time, can cause all sorts of problems. It's kind of like the laws on the books...there are some laws out there, still theoretically in effect, that only a handful of people even know about, just because they are so old / buried in some book somewhere...so people end up effectively duplicating the laws every once in a while, just because they are unaware of what is already there; my point being, old / dead information / out of date information / hard to access information will cause the service to, in time, collapse, unless it implements self-cleansing operations (telling everyone to rewrite or verify their stuff every five years, etc.).

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (1)

AK Marc (707885) | about a year ago | (#44627235)

I try to not add people from my current job. If I change jobs, They might know more about it than I'd want. I've seen people put up new jobs before they start, or start adding people from a different company while still working somewhere. Or, another that worries me is that I have a number of recruiters adding me. They want to keep an eye on potential candidates to fill roles. But my wife is a recruiter, so I do actually know a lot of recruiters. But my current employer might see 100 recruiters (not that I have that many, but a joking worst case), and assume I'm looking or a job, so make my life more miserable under the expectation I'll be leaving shortly.

Or, my most recent issue, I had a non-compete. It was written specifically enough that it would never have affected me, so I signed it. Turns out, the small company owner sees *everyone* as a competitor. I went to work for a company that has never bid against them, but he still had named as a "competitor", so I couldn't work for 3 months. The "fix" was to lie on Linkedin about my start date. Well, now I have a 3-month gap in employment history that doesn't actually exist. Now that a few years have passed, I'm going to go back and fix the dates, but it's still another reason I have to not link to current jobs. If anyone challenges me, the answer would be "why do I need to, I see you every day".

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44624821)

>I know plenty of people with 1,000+ "friends" on LinkedIn.

They're doing it wrong, plain and simple.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (1)

Above (100351) | about a year ago | (#44626057)

It appears the masses have already down voted this AC, but I think his comment is more insightful than it appears on the surface.

People go to LinkedIn for the value of vetted, business only relationships, and when they add everyone they are doing it wrong, and devaluing the entire service. What we should be talking about though is why they are doing it wrong, and a lot of it is that LinkedIn has incentives to push for more connections.

An idea for a totally elitist social network (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44624915)

Call it "The Ten" and allow people to only be friends with up to 10 people.

Re:An idea for a totally elitist social network (2)

greg1104 (461138) | about a year ago | (#44625827)

Call it "The Ten" and allow people to only be friends with up to 10 people.

I've already got that, I just check my Friendster account.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (2)

erp_consultant (2614861) | about a year ago | (#44625471)

Being a contractor I use LinkedIn and I find it useful, but your points are well taken. Recruiters can be a real PITA on there. Often they are trying to fill a single job and send requests to everyone that might be even a remote fit for the position. I will not 'friend' them but send an email reply (without disclosing my personal email address) if the job interests me. Otherwise I just ignore the invitation. I won't add anyone I don't know personally. Maybe that makes me a purist but so be it.

One of the things that bothers me on LinkedIn is that once you friend someone they can see all your contacts. I'd like to have a way to show my contacts to people I trust and hide them from people that I have an arms length relationship with, or none at all. Such as that random recruiter I just got a request from. I am certain that many of them send you a friend request just so they can mine your friends for more contacts. I even sent a request to LinkedIn to add this as an enhancement. Never got a reply.

I suspect that LinkedIn wants it exactly this way because recruiters pay for the service and people like me just use the free version of it. Money talks.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (1)

AK Marc (707885) | about a year ago | (#44627253)

I want to be able to "circle" my friends. Have all my school contacts in a school circle, and work in another circle (possibly differentiating from 5+ years old co-workers, recent co-workers, current co-workers, and recruiting contacts), and anyone I add gets access only to their circle.

Or like how I see your suggestion and having 10 levels of friend. 1=closest contact, 10=friend of a friend or recruiter. the lower numbers can "see" the higher numbers, but the high numbers don't see the lower. As you get to know them and see they aren't abusing your contact list, they can move up.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (1)

erp_consultant (2614861) | about a year ago | (#44630927)

"I want to be able to "circle" my friends." - Exactly. Just like how it's done on Google+. Even Facebook has a similar, though not as elegant, concept. This is something that LinkedIn could do quite easily if they wanted to. If it were a feature only available to paying customers I might sign up just for that alone.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44627049)

I think you nailed it.

It was valuable when someone with who you were familiar of their abilities, attributes and ACCOMPLISHMENTS would recommend someone who they personally knew and could vouch for their work. When it changed to just a numbers game of people not really known, it became useless.

The recommendation model is tricky. I have worked with people who had startling recommendations form notables, and they but the unit in the tank in less than a year. Absolute turkeys with genuine recommendation letters from notables. Almost a Con.

I see it as a problem. I have no solutions. It seems to get worse every year.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (2)

fearofcarpet (654438) | about a year ago | (#44627363)

It seems like every person that breaths the same air as me at a conference, stumbles across my website, applies for a job, etc., tries to add me to their LinkedIn network. I get a zillion emails with "Someone you don't know and don't want to know wants to add you to their LinkedIn something something." And people keep setting up these groups for former members/employees of stuff, which just dilutes the pool of useful contacts further. LinkedIn is useful for keeping track of former colleagues (because we all move around a lot), and I do occasionally get non-spam from people finding me on LinkedIn, but the SNR is ridiculous.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (1)

t4ng* (1092951) | about a year ago | (#44627521)

LinkedIn's value early on was that people added their real life connections.

I disagree. I saw no value with LinkedIn. I don't need to duplicate my real life connections at an online service that can then sell that information or harass my connections with solicitations.

It grew when recruiters started friending everyone they contacted so their search network could grow.

This was the exact moment I dumped LinkedIn... when recruiters started trying to harvest contact info for my former employers out of me. They already do that in the real world. I don't need to get twice as much of their bullshit.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (2)

TheRaven64 (641858) | about a year ago | (#44627741)

I'm not on LinkedIn, and my spam filter has now learned that everything from them is spam. Looking though my spam folder, I seem to get 2-3 invitations from people whose names I don't even recognise (and some sent to aliases, for example the FreeBSD Core Team, rather than to me personally). I can't imagine anyone getting sensible results from any exploration of the LinkedIn graph.

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (1)

Bigbutt (65939) | about a year ago | (#44628895)

Not only that, I get business association spam too. When I signed up a few years back I was getting only a piece here and there. Now I'm getting 10 to 20 a day and the occasional phone call.

Worse are the recruiters who see that I used to admin Microsoft servers and spam me with Windows jobs even though it was LAN Manager back in 89.

[John]

Re:They ruined what made it successful already. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44630577)

I just keep a 0 contacts LinkedIn profile as an online resume.

As soon as there were signs that LinkedIn just wanted to be another Facebook, I deleted my old profile and started that new one with 0 contacts.

I also promptly delete any requests to connect sent to my email, and ignore the ones in my LinkedIn profile inbox.

Obligatory (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44624361)

3,224,713 people recommended Justin

LinkedIn much worse than Facebook (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44624367)

It doesn't let you block people, and it lets people know when you've visited their profile. It's fucking creepy as hell, and yet everyone gets on Facebook's case instead.

Re:LinkedIn much worse than Facebook (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44624579)

Stop stalking people. Or upgrade to a premium stealth account.

  Linkedin is like a virus or a trojan. They actively trick people to give them their email account name and passwords. And it spreads.
  However, the plus side is Linkedin isn't yet clogged up with tweeners and mums posting endless pictures of their kids.

  HR and others think linkedin is the best thing in the world, some don't even do reference checks, just check a linkedin profile and if there is someone vaugely connected to where they said they work then its confirmed! I think linkedin is the biggest threat to facebook.

  This is the world we live in

Re:LinkedIn much worse than Facebook (4, Insightful)

lgw (121541) | about a year ago | (#44624793)

It doesn't let you block people, and it lets people know when you've visited their profile. It's fucking creepy as hell, and yet everyone gets on Facebook's case instead

That's appropriate for a professional network, but would be terrible for a personal network. Even compared to putting personal stuff on Facebook, putting personal stuff on Linkedin is unwise.

My linkedin profile is my resume, word-for-word if differently arranged. I don't care who sees it, because it is explicitly my "public face". And it's quite nice to know month-by-month how many people see my page, as a sort of vague gauge of employment market temperature - if I paid to see who among those who visited were recruiters, it would even be somewhat accurate, but I don't care that much.

LinkedIn is supposed to be the stuff you make public and want others to see, so no, I don't find that stuff creepy at all. Of course, if younger people start using it differently, then the creepy factor could escalate.

Re:LinkedIn much worse than Facebook (2)

Jerslan (1088525) | about a year ago | (#44624871)

By letting you know who's been stalking you, that makes it less creepy and more transparent than Facebook. So 10 recruiters and a handful of people with stealth accounts saw my LinkedIn profile.... I only use it to keep my resumé out there anyways. It's not like they're going to get the latest updates on what I think about [insert politically/socially charged topic here].

Re:LinkedIn much worse than Facebook (1)

alexo (9335) | about a year ago | (#44636935)

It doesn't let you block people, and it lets people know when you've visited their profile.

Not quite. The privacy/security settings [linkedin.com] are quite comprehensive:

Privacy Controls:
- Turn on/off your activity broadcasts
- Select who can see your activity feed
- Select what others see when you've viewed their profile
- Select who can see your connections
- Change your profile photo & visibility
- Show/hide "Viewers of this profile also viewed" box

In particular:

Select what others see when you've viewed their profile:
[ ] Your name and headline (Recommended)
[ ] Anonymous profile characteristics such as industry and title
    Note: Selecting this option will disable Profile Stats. Whenever you switch to anonymous, your viewer history gets erased.
[*] You will be totally anonymous.
    Note: Selecting this option will disable Profile Stats. Whenever you switch to anonymous, your viewer history gets erased.

You were saying?

I left the first time they were hacked... (1)

uCallHimDrJ0NES (2546640) | about a year ago | (#44624447)

...and failed to respond appropriately and publicly to the breach. It's been a few years now. I haven't looked back.

Re:I left the first time they were hacked... (3, Interesting)

dwywit (1109409) | about a year ago | (#44624623)

I left when people I barely knew started "endorsing" me for skills I don't have.
 
"Oh you work in IT, right? I'll endorse you for SEO skills"
 
Never been so insulted in my life.

Re:I left the first time they were hacked... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44637557)

Most of my endorsements have been for things I actually do and from people I've worked with, but recently I got an endorsement out of the blue from someone I haven't even spoken to in years for something I never did back then so how could he possibly vouch for that skill? I think it's time I started pruning my connections like I do annually on Facebook.

Facebook (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44624457)

I remember this happened to Facebook, but to general people.

I also remember that is when Facebook went from a fairly average site to complete trash in a short couple years.

RIP LInkedIn.

LinkedIn (2)

sexconker (1179573) | about a year ago | (#44624459)

Is worthless. The only thing it's good for is for when some dumbass posts "Worked on major projects including Half-Life 3" on their resume and spills the beans.

It's got all of the meaningless connections and annoying ads (in this case, recruiter spam) of Facebook with none of the hilarious drama or animal pictures.

Re:LinkedIn (1)

alexo (9335) | about a year ago | (#44637047)

When I was looking for work, I used it to find people who worked at places I wanted to apply to and ask them questions about the company.
Some even offered to pass my resume to the hiring manager (bypassing some of the HR screening).

Eventually, I went to work for a company that an ex-coworker of mine worked for but had that option not been available, I would have been better off for using LI in my job search.

So no, not worthless. You just have to know how to use it.

How to Fuck Up Anything (2)

CanHasDIY (1672858) | about a year ago | (#44624469)

Commercialization and demand for profitability - the 2 fastest ways to fuck up a good idea.

The whole point of Linkedin (3, Insightful)

apcullen (2504324) | about a year ago | (#44624481)

Was that it allowed me to manage my professional contacts and promote my career without the nonsense of facebook. I'm not interested in logging in to linkedin to make friends or play games. It's all about business. If said university students and 14-year-olds happen to be in business and have something to contribute to my career, I'll happily welcome them to the community.

If not, it's probably time to abandon my linkedin account.

Re:The whole point of Linkedin (2)

erp_consultant (2614861) | about a year ago | (#44625533)

This.

Above all, use LinkedIn for what it's intended for. Purely professional stuff. I don't see any need to put in marital status, hobbies, political views, vacation plans..any of that crap.

Re:The whole point of Linkedin (1)

Bigbutt (65939) | about a year ago | (#44628905)

Yea, but my connections do it so I get spammed by their updates.

[John]

Re:The whole point of Linkedin (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44626095)

If not, it's probably time to abandon my linkedin account.

that 'time' passed long ago.

linkedin is over. too much pollution in the database and no way for them, or you, to go back..

even if you tried to clean up your own relationships, it wont stop the 'add me' spam that got linkedin put in our mailserver's blocklist a long time ago... and if your 'friends' dont clean their own shit up, their list is worthless to them and to you.

captcha: indexed

Facebook for people with more severe USI (4, Interesting)

Joining Yet Again (2992179) | about a year ago | (#44624497)

"Networking" is already annoying, being mostly about forming fake social relationships to advance your career. Click-to-Like networking on the Internet is even worse, as there is no real effort nor assessment of reputation.

Re:Facebook for people with more severe USI (1)

sexconker (1179573) | about a year ago | (#44624611)

I just drink cranberry juice when I get a severe one.

Re:Facebook for people with more severe USI (1)

FilmedInNoir (1392323) | about a year ago | (#44630443)

USI=Unwarranted Self-Importance maybe?
So the joke is a pun perhaps, since UTI=Urinary tract infection.
Your mother's BMI is above 30.

Re:Facebook for people with more severe USI (1)

alexo (9335) | about a year ago | (#44637431)

Your mother's BMI is above 30.

So don't mess with her... [cenvall.com]

Re:Facebook for people with more severe USI (1)

ackthpt (218170) | about a year ago | (#44624733)

+1

Re:Facebook for people with more severe USI (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44624839)

>forming fake social relationships to advance your career

Yeah, but just watch what happens to your career if you don't. Go with the flow, man.

Re:Facebook for people with more severe USI (1)

sgt scrub (869860) | about a year ago | (#44626037)

Wait! But this is "cloud" networking. Cloud makes it special. /snark

Re:Facebook for people with more severe USI (1)

gx5000 (863863) | about a year ago | (#44629345)

Agreed but it's always been this way..... At least now I can meet "friends" of "friends" (Contacts versus acquaintances) without having to go out to mixers twice a week with people I'd sooner show the way out than invite over to my house for dinner.

Soon to be proposed... (2)

ackthpt (218170) | about a year ago | (#44624601)

Legislation barring companies from recruiting minors.

i have foreseen it

Linkedin = spam whore (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44624847)

They don't give a shit or pretend to have morals anymore. Fuck em I'd rather beg on the street for beer money than use their shit.

message for linked in (1)

jsepeta (412566) | about a year ago | (#44624953)

fuck you. fuck you very much. the last thing i need is more bullshit in my "employment feed". and to compete for jobs with teenagers.

Ye gods, not even more spam! (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44624967)

"who will doubtlessly love when a couple thousand students try to connect with them all at once"

I already get more spam from people adding me onto LinkedIn than I ever wanted. I don't have an account there. Why do I need to get message after message after message about it? And now they're relaxing the participation requirements even more? Time to update my spam filter to exclude *anything* from LinkedIn.

Spam (3, Interesting)

Charliemopps (1157495) | about a year ago | (#44624985)

I manage an application/server suite that includes some mail functionality. In the 5 years I've been doing it I've only ever had to enter 1 domain into the blacklist... linkedin.com

It remains, to this day, the only site in the blacklist.

Re:Spam (1)

tapspace (2368622) | about a year ago | (#44627083)

Yeah, they are scumbags plain and simple.

Linked-In the new home of Resume Padding (4, Insightful)

Virtucon (127420) | about a year ago | (#44625027)

At one time I had a Linkedin account, then I got rid of it. I still periodically look out there at people I've worked with. Let's see there was the Director in the Architecture Group at one organization that labelled his time as Director of Architecture. Of course there's the CIO that was CIO for three months then was fired but his Linkedin profile says he was CIO for two years at that organization. Some old habits die hard I guess, it's just now billions of people can see it.

Then there's the incessant asks from people that I've worked with to recommend them on Linkedin, which is now the substitute for what we call references. Sorry Joe, I can't recommend you because while we worked at the same place we never really worked on any projects together and from what I recall you were always late to meetings and people called you stinky behind your back when you weren't looking.

Sorry Linkedin, you like other Social Media sites are off of my list for good, you don't help me get my gigs and you certainly don't help me keep my confidential information confidential. That's not what they're about, I get it, but no, I'm not turning my CV over to your organization, not today not tomorrow, not ever.

Altogether a good idea. (1)

wjcofkc (964165) | about a year ago | (#44625227)

I think it's a great way to get kids thinking about their future before said future hits them like a truck. Putting together professional profiles would make a great (and gradable) school project that could be kept up to date as they progress through middle and high school, and who knows, it may even get kids to clean up their online act when they realize what effect their trashy facebook profiles could have on their future. Then again, it would be interesting to read a well put together LinkedIn profile of a 16 year old, and then compare to their facebook profile.

What's the point on LinkedIn? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44625345)

Can somebody please explain to me what LinkedIn actually does? That is, how it's actually helpful in real life. I understand the theory of it, but it just seems useless in practice. All it does is send me emails from recruiters for jobs that only vaguely resemble what I actually do in places I don't want to live. Has anybody actually ever hired anybody or been hired because of LinkedIn?

LinkedIn links are annoying (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44625455)

,
I've gotten these mailed around in inter-office mail: "Hey, have a look at this..." with a link to someone's LinkedIn profile. Sometimes, even sent by an external candidate for some job.

But clicking the link just brings up some "Sign up now!" page. To me, that's a broken link.

Closed My Account (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44625489)

Two weeks ago:
LinkedIn Shuts Down TopTal Ads That Featured Photos Of Female Engineers [huffingtonpost.com]

In the last two weeks, have they fixed the cultral problem at Linked-In? I doubt it.

Originally it was the only social network that I was willing to join.
Now it's the social network that I am most happy to have left.

Re:Closed My Account (1)

AK Marc (707885) | about a year ago | (#44627439)

They look like a dating site ad. A hot chick with a "try for 2-weeks risk-free" caption? I'd guess them to be accidentally removed as dating adds. I get so many dating site spam ads, I can see why they'd want to remain a "safe" place.

14 year olds? (1)

c4tp (526292) | about a year ago | (#44626051)

Get 'em young

Where's Chris Hansen (or John Beard for the AD fans) when you need him?

8 year olds dude (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44626151)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERZqkUqw-xg

The beast only rows hungrier (4, Interesting)

WOOFYGOOFY (1334993) | about a year ago | (#44626349)

Sniff sniff .. I smell a company being run on VC vapors...a concerns for numbers that have to keep going by hook or by crook lest the actual valuation of the business-plan-free enterprise all come tumbling down..

What does LinkedIn sell and to whom and for how much and how often? How much is any of our data even worth with every cloud-based social-web search-engine new media play all running the same analytics on the same user base? A dollar? A buck fifty? Once? I'm worth a 1000 times that to Starbucks and they have only to plop down another green fish-girl sign on some block that doesn't already have one to start minting fresh people just like me.

There has to be a limit to the amount of money that can change hands for binders filled with women's likely shopping preferences and how many times you can sell this information to sellers. People aren't just aren't born and don't die that fast. Once you know someone is a liberal Subaru driving lesbian with a soft spot for abused animals, a keen interest in Sara Maclaughlin and a $1500.00 a year wardrobe budget where is there to go for the next 50 years with this person ?

Re:The beast only rows hungrier (1)

LeadSongDog (1120683) | about a year ago | (#44630019)

where is there to go for the next 50 years with this person ?

Three words: retail dynamic biometrics. On entering a store, she'll find the salesdroid who approaches her is just a little hotter, a little more convincing, and has just the right sense of timing to make the sale. Oh, and she'll be wearing an earpiece...

Re:The beast only rows hungrier (1)

dj245 (732906) | about a year ago | (#44630505)

where is there to go for the next 50 years with this person ?

Three words: retail dynamic biometrics. On entering a store, she'll find the salesdroid who approaches her is just a little hotter, a little more convincing, and has just the right sense of timing to make the sale. Oh, and she'll be wearing an earpiece...

This is a poor example if you are trying to respond to the GP question of "Once you know someone is a liberal ... lesbian.... where is there to go for the next 50 years with this person." There is no new information needed required for this kind of marketing. You knew the lady was a lesbian, but that is something that probably won't change over time.

A far better example is immediate targeted marketing based on fresh data. For example, I go to a NAPA auto parts store on a Saturday morning, and run my credit card to pay for the purchase. If I was hit with an SMS offering discounted coffee/donuts at a nearby store, before I even got back into my car, that is some valuable advertising. The new information of "he bought something at an auto parts store 30 seconds ago, the time of day is morning" is an urgent marketing opportunity brought about by a very recent action. This is far more valuable information than "this person is X", where X is unlikely to change over time.

Re:The beast only rows hungrier (1)

WOOFYGOOFY (1334993) | about a year ago | (#44633345)

Interesting. My first thought (aside from interesting...) was that high priced durable goods are not bought in this manner. Maybe marketing types know better, but then there's always states with so called buyer's remorse clauses....

Re:The beast only rows hungrier (1)

neurovish (315867) | about a year ago | (#44630161)

Do you live near the city dump? Your sense of smell isn't very good. LinkedIn is a public company, LNKD, and they are profitable...somehow. Last quarter their profit was $314 million, and their last four quarters' profit adds up to over $1 billion. They also sit on about $1 billion in assets with about half as much debt. I don't really know where their money comes from either, but there is a lot of it. I thought the same thing about google when they went public, and I was pretty wrong there.

Re:The beast only rows hungrier (1)

FilmedInNoir (1392323) | about a year ago | (#44630983)

I don't really know where their money comes from either, but there is a lot of it.

Business units
LinkedIn derives its revenues from three business divisions:
Talent Solutions: Recruiters and corporations pay for:

  • Branded corporate page on LinkedIn, complete with careers section.
  • Pay per click-through Job ads that are targeted to LinkedIn users which match the job profile.
  • Access to the database of LinkedIn users and resumes.

Marketing Solutions:

  • LinkedIn advertisers pay for pay per click-through targeted ads.

Premium Subscriptions: LinkedIn users pay for:

  • LinkedIn Business for business users
  • LinkedIn Talent for recruiters
  • LinkedIn JobSeeker for unemployed LinkedIn users looking for a job
  • LinkedIn Sales for Sales Professionals

Some elements of the various subscription services are also on a pay per use basis like InMail.
Thanks Obama! eerr ahhh, Wikipedia.

Re:The beast only rows hungrier (1)

BorisSkratchunkov (642046) | about a year ago | (#44630871)

Once you know someone is a liberal Subaru driving lesbian with a soft spot for abused animals, a keen interest in Sara Maclaughlin and a $1500.00 a year wardrobe budget where is there to go for the next 50 years with this person ?

Hey mate, that's 75k in revenue. Time to get on 1500dollarwardrobe.com. Did I mention that we plan to have deliveries made personally by Sara McLachlan for an extra $3000 fee?

Re:The beast only rows hungrier (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44635467)

Agreed this would be a problem if they were selling the data on that individual-but they aren't; they are selling the ability to target that individual based on their data (which they keep private). For the next 50 years that individual might be part of a prized demographic that advertisers want access to. This would be the equivalent of them saying - "you want access to conservative baby boomers who drive mazda's?-I can help you with that."

Time to cancel my account (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44626823)

I canceled my Facebook account when it was no longer limited to students at my university. Now it's LinkedIn's turn.

Cubicle Bees? (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44626935)

Here's to hexagonal cubicles. And queens.

LinkedIn is for trolls... and what else? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#44628677)

LinkedIn is used by desperate recruiters to troll people. Is there any other use for the site? I haven't found one. What's interesting is the trolls don't actually visit your linkedin page. They have some way to search for people who have the bingo-card skills they want in a certain area. They spam you, but don't even know who you are. It's like slapping you in the face - the recruiter doesn't know who you are, but wants you to come to them. LinkedIn deserves to fail as far as I'm concerned.

Re:LinkedIn is for trolls... and what else? (1)

gx5000 (863863) | about a year ago | (#44629245)

Not my experience...... Get involved on Linked with a friend that is an Engineer, a musician, a banker, a Goverment employee and lawyer..... Next thing you'll notice is the job offers from friends of friends....

We're naked on the net, again. (1)

gx5000 (863863) | about a year ago | (#44629227)

I feel a Gattaca moment coming on..... I'm on Linked, but I shudder when I see all the information available to employers and colleagues..... And I've also started to notice employment oppurtunities being linked to the "who knows you" from it too.... If you don't think the Intelligence community hasn't taken interested in our info there more so than FB, think again.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?
or Connect with...

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>