×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

SuSE Announces More Layoffs

timothy posted more than 12 years ago | from the ups-and-downs dept.

SuSE 136

jdfox writes: "SuSE announced more layoffs on Friday: 10% reductions in Germany, or about 50 (mainly non-technical) staff. This follows the February layoffs of 30 out of the 45 US staff in Oakland. Perhaps a merger with MandrakeSoft is in order? Both are RPM-based, both offer KDE-based admin tools. OTOH, as MandrakeSoft is right in the middle of an IPO, it might not be the best time to be thinking about a major acquisition. I mainly use Debian, but SuSE is an excellent distro, and I would hate to see the company go bust."

cancel ×
This is a preview of your comment

No Comment Title Entered

Anonymous Coward 1 minute ago

No Comment Entered

136 comments

No thank you (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#67605)

SuSE is too reliant on YAST, which will ultimately be their downfall as a distribution. That, and lack of sales/profit, of course.

Why are there trees on the Champs Elysees? (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#67606)

Because the German soldiers like to march in the shade. (rimshot) Thank you!

Re:KDE based admin tools? (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#67607)

Sorry to disabuse you, but IMNSHO Mandrake tools are some of the worst and most amateur tools ever made. Even just *launching* them takes forever, and we're talking GTK here, not even GNOME. The interfaces themselves are horrible and have had no thought put into them, they lack feedback, flexibility, elegance or anything that could justify such supposed fandom as yours.

Re:FUCK OFF BITCH (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#67608)

Sure, the Linux kiddies are annoying, but I'd say that the biggest problem with Linux is the GPL. Pretty much ensures that all these companies will continue to lose money.

a lot more than 4 browsers! :) (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#67609)

galeon
konqueror
links, lynx
mozilla
netscape (hey, I just installed 4.78, hasn't crashed in the 30 seconds it's been up ...)
skpstone

... and a passel of others, too ;)

Re:It's the logo STUPID!!!! (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#67610)

You have no idea ! SuSe, lazy Suze, it's cute, it's female, it's "pummelig" and I take my little SuSe very serious. SuSe is the kind of thing you want to cuddle with and fix her a computer, the dream of every *cool* and lonely, misunderstood hacker, who needs sometimes to prove that he is a good guy. (Did I say sometimes, oh, I sometimes say sometimes, yes)

Penguins need lizards, because the penguins just don't know what kind of hat to wear with the chic tuxedos, black, white or red.

SuSe will tell him, it really doesn't matter. :-)

You can't cuddle with a penguin. You always think he is wet, cold and too slick, even if he kinda looks cute. Besides penguins get too exited en masse. Well, penguins are kind of cute though too, especially their eyes and the tuxedo really makes their belly so much more adorable.

So, I think, penguins and lizards make an excellent couple, but as you know they are different, penguins and lizards, or do you think women and men are alike ?

Aside from that, in Germany it's not necessary to be a big company, it's good enough to be a good company. I hope they make it.

They should come out with the equivalent of the RH's professional server together with their new firewall CD and sell it at a higher price in the U.S. RH's professional server is so much more expensive here in the U.S. that they can afford to raise their prices and compete. The stupidity on both sides is that they so much divide their out-of-the box installs into workstation and server etc. Why ? Nobody will just remain with their Linux box at a workstation level. Everybody would like to run their home-based servers and network like the pros after a while. I don't get it.

It's the logo STUPID!!!! (2)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#67611)

Nobody takes a lizard as a logo seriously.....in order to step it up and play with the big boys perhaps Suse should incoporate a common household object as it's logo like some other companies have....like a flying door or something else (****window****)

The SuSE Yast: good and bad bits (2)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#67612)

Well, I'm an ex RedHat user.
I keep looking at new RH releases, but the one thing I like SuSE for is -ironically- one aspect of YAST: the complete package integration. I have _one_ CD I insert, and I can choose from all the packages in the distro. RH lacks the integration, their idea of a 'Pro' pack is to throw in some more CDs and a manual - it's up to you to figure out what you've got and on which CD it lives (the only way out is to use the DVD instead, but that's not always practical).
And manuals - the contents makes you forgive the occasional translation slips (stray bits of German throughout). RH is quite good - but I feel SuSE beats them by being complete. And it usually works ;-).

They should really merge with Caldera (2)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#67613)


Their technical expertise and quality of their distribution is closest to Caldera. As well with geographical location - Caldera and Suse engineering are about a 12 minute train ride apart in Germany. I have a lot of respect for both distributions in their focus on quality. The Caldera and Suse engineers actualy have quite a bit of mutual respect for each other and get along quite well (from very good sources). They are also both focussed on making the LSB a major force in the Linux world wich is a very good thing.

Mandrake and SuSe can't merge (2)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#67614)

I don't see how MandrakeSoft and SuSe could merge since the former is 100% dedicated to free software, whereas SuSe does not have any problem with not releasing ISOs of their product and developping a proprietary software (YaST).

There are too much philosophical gaps between those 2 companies. I bet lot's of Mandrake developers would leave the company if they were told to work for SuSe.

That is correct (4)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#67615)

  • gcc 2.96 is actually more standards compliant than any other version of gcc released at the time Red Hat made this decision (3.0 is even more compliant, but not as stable) yet). It may not be "standards compliant" as in "what most others are shipping", but 2.96 is almost fully ISO C99 and ISO C++ 98 compliant, unlike any previous version of gcc.
  • gcc 2.96 has more complete support for C++. Older versions of gcc could handle only a very limited subset of C++. Earlier versions of g++ often had problems with templates and other valid C++ constructs.
  • gcc 2.96 generates better, more optimized code.
  • gcc 2.96 supports all architectures Red Hat is currently supporting, including ia64. No other compiler can do this. Having to maintain different compilers for every different architecture is a development (find a bug, then fix it 4 times), QA and support nightmare.
  • The binary incompatibility issues are not as bad as some people and companies make you believe. First of all, they affect dynamically linked C++ code only. If you don't use C++, you aren't affected. If you use C++ and link statically, you aren't affected. If you don't mind depending on a current glibc, you might also want to link statically to c++ libraries while linking dynamically to glibc and other C libraries you're using: g++ -o test test.cc -Wl,-Bstatic -lstdc++ -Wl,-Bdynamic (Thanks to Pavel Roskin [mailto] for pointing this out) Second, the same issues appear with every major release of gcc so far. gcc 2.7.x C++ is not binary compatible with gcc 2.8.x. gcc 2.8.x C++ is not binary compatible with egcs 1.0.x. egcs 1.0.x C++ is not binary compatible with egcs 1.1.x. egcs 1.1.x C++ is not binary compatible with gcc 2.95. gcc 2.95 C++ is not binary compatible with gcc 3.0. Besides, it can easily be circumvented. Either link statically, or simply distribute libstdc++ with your program and install it if necessary. Since it has a different soname, it can coexist with other libstdc++ versions without causing any problems. Red Hat Linux 7 also happens to be the first Linux distributions using the current version of glibc, 2.2.x. This update is not binary compatible with older distributions either (unless you update glibc - there's nothing that prevents you from updating libstdc++ at the same time), so complaining about gcc's new C++ ABI breaking binary compatibility is pointless. If you want to distribute something binary-only, link it statically and it will run everywhere. Someone has to be the first to take a step like this. If nobody dared to make a change because nobody else is doing it, we'd all still be using gcc 1.0, COBOL or ALGOL. No wait, all of those were new at some point...
  • Most of gcc 2.96's perceived "bugs" are actually broken code that older gccs accepted because they were not standards compliant - or, using an alternative term to express the same thing, buggy. A C or C++ compiler that doesn't speak the standardized C language is a bug, not a feature. In the initial version of gcc 2.96, there were a couple of other bugs. All known ones have been fixed in the version from updates - and the version that is in the current beta version of Red Hat Linux. The bugs in the initial version don't make the whole compiler broken, though. There has never been a 100% bug free compiler, or any other 100% bug free non-trivial program. The current version can be downloaded here [linux-easy.com].
  • gcc 3.0, the current "stable" release (released quite some time after Red Hat released gcc 2.96-RH), fixes some problems, but introduces many others - for example, gcc 3.0 can't compile KDE 2.2 beta 1 correctly. Until the first set of 3.0 updates is released, I still claim 2.96 is the best compiler yet.
Trolling for GCC 2.96

What exactly happened between RedHat & Oracle? (3)

emil (695) | more than 12 years ago | (#67617)

I heard some rumor about Oracle pushing an ERP solution at RedHat that involved WinNT, which started the bad blood between them.

Then, out comes RedHat Database, which would surely cause Oracle some displeasure even if it is no competetive threat.

Perhaps even a larger concern is Suse's use of ReiserFS. Red Hat has been screaming that fsck and other user-level tools for ReiserFS are tremendously substandard, and that ReiserFS corrupts itself under heavy load, to say nothing of the NFS problems (I don't know if these are fixed).

(Gee it would be nice to know which JFS RedHat is going to choose before I install any more XFS versions - perhaps it really will be ext3 after all.)

Why is Oracle coming to a different conclusion about ReiserFS? Granted, it's not that hard to restore a corrupted Oracle data file, but why have any question of risk?

There is more here than meets the eye.

Re:No thank you (1)

Stormie (708) | more than 12 years ago | (#67618)

..the alleged sysadmin went with Redh*t (7.0, no less...isn't that the one with the borken gcc?)

  • No, that's the one with the more standards complaint gcc that breaks some shitty bug-ridden old C++ code.
  • Spelling "broken" as "borken" does not make you look like a wise, witty and bearded old-school hacker. It makes you look like a wanker and an idiot. But it could be worse - you could have written "b0rken".

Re:Oracle / SuSE (1)

mha (1305) | more than 12 years ago | (#67620)

I forgot: why do I know this? Well, I work for SuSE in Oakland and also at Oracle (building 401 right where the Oracle Linux group is) in Redwood Shores.

--
Michael Hasenstein
http://www.suse.de/~mha/

Re:Oracle / SuSE (2)

mha (1305) | more than 12 years ago | (#67621)

Oracle used to use a RedHat 6.0 based Linux for Oracle 8i. In December, for Oracle 9i, they switched to SuSE Linux 7.1 for all Linux work, and later they used the 7.2 kernel with their 7.1 installations. They now use SuSE Linux 7.0 for the older glibc 2.1 based products and SuSE Linux 7.1 and 7.2 for the glibc 2.2 based (Oracle 9i) ones and for the Oracle 8i+glibc 2.2-oracle patch stuff.<p>

SuSE Oracle support page is
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/<p>

See the LVM whitepaper there for some interesting SuSE-only things (although it's all opensource (GPL) stuff).

--
Michael Hasenstein
http://www.suse.de/~mha/

Re:Oracle / SuSE (2)

weasel (8923) | more than 12 years ago | (#67623)


The original comment was correct and you are both wrong. For Oracle 9i, only SuSE is supported.

Also the idea of Oracle buying SuSE does make some sense. Oracle has seriously chopped down the number of future supported platforms and Linux/Intel is one of them.

Don't worry too much (3)

thorsen (9515) | more than 12 years ago | (#67624)

Please don't take this as a bad sign. SuSE is just restructuring a bit and there is absolutely no signs of the company going under or whatever other gloomy future timothy has in mind for the company.

Merging with Mandrake is a ridiculous proposition and it's incredibly bad behaviour of a journalist (or someone acting in this role) to suggest something like this.

Bo Thorsen.

Disclaimer: I work for SuSE Labs, but I speak for myself.

Re:You might want to reconsider that (3)

Omnifarious (11933) | more than 12 years ago | (#67625)

It's not clear to me that the original poster was talking about gcc-2.96. If I'm not mistaken, Mandrake has used things like pgcc in the past.

Re:Oracle / SuSE (1)

pci (13339) | more than 12 years ago | (#67627)

According to Oracle () RedHat 6.x/7.x and SuSE 7.x
(http://platforms.oracle.com/linux)

Please check your facts, never mind this is /.
;)

About 70 people? (3)

tippergore (32520) | more than 12 years ago | (#67630)

Slackware have about 4-5 people, I believe. 2 maintain the website predominantly, Patrick Volkerding has full control over the distribution. It gets along quite nicely.... I can understand perhaps, some programmers for designing the Suse-specific apps, but how many could there be?

70 expendable workers? You just can't throw workers at a problem and expect everything to just organize. This is why so many companies tank.

Of course, I'm sure Slackware would have been getting along a lot _more_ nicely had they not put their store on a very slow ASDL line when their new release was announced on slashdot...

That's just dumb. It was bogged down for like 3 days, and even now it's very slow.

Slackware Store [slackware.com]

Re:Debian (1)

Alphix (33559) | more than 12 years ago | (#67633)

Quote: "some people enjoy having a stable, unchanging system that's up-to-date."

How's that for a contradiction? unchanging <-> up-to-date

Re:acquisitions (Mandrake sucks) (1)

gimpboy (34912) | more than 12 years ago | (#67635)

while i appreciate your enilghtened viewpoint, you should also realize that the quality of a distro is irrelevent if they cannot pay the bills. i'm sorry you had a bad expirence with mandrake. i personally cannot comment on it-i tried mandrake out once a couple years ago. for every distro there is at least one person who has had a good expirence and one person who hasn't.

there are alot of people on slashdot that bash other distros. i personally think the only people who have an opinion that matters is someone who creates a distro. a person who creates and maintains a distro has an understanding of what that process is like and can make an informed decision on what is and is not utter CRAP. so mandrake didnt work out for you, thats nice. i really dont think they want people like yourself as a customer. personally i would prefer customers with level heads and a little reason.

use LaTeX? want an online reference manager that

acquisitions (4)

gimpboy (34912) | more than 12 years ago | (#67636)

actually right after the ipo might be a good time for acquisitions. if suse has alot of tools that can be adapted to enhance mandrake it might be a good idea. after the ipo mandrake should have alot of capital and will need something to invest in.

use LaTeX? want an online reference manager that

Re:SuSE merge with The FRENCH? (1)

SlashDread (38969) | more than 12 years ago | (#67637)

While I do not condone the useage of the word pussy, to describe a frenchman, poster has a point(although its different then what he thinks);

Why is this US based website, so goddamn USCENTRIC? Well Ill be darned.., TWO distro's in Europe?? One is in money probs? Well certainly one distro is enough! Let them merge! They probably both are eurobabble localized anyways!

It seems much more rationale from codebase POV to merge Mandrake and RedHat or.. or.. SuSe and Slackware.. or or RedHat and Suse...

Anyways, mergers are never a solution to afloat a sinking ship again (not to say that SuSe is sinking.. Its just not a way to SAVE a sinking ship)

Greetz Richard

Want SuSE to succeed? (2)

cr0sh (43134) | more than 12 years ago | (#67640)

Go out and _buy_ the ISO!

I recently bought the personal version of 7.2 - to use to update my 6.3 box. Being a relative newbie on Linux, I had my doubts and "fears" on doing the update (after all, it was a major version upgrade). I wasn't sure the update would work properly, or that something would break after reboot, or what...

I figured something would go wrong - how could it go smooth?

But you know something - it did! The update worked great - no problems at all. Reboot happened and everything was fine...

Ok, not everything was fine - everything worked and appeared OK - but I found that X4.0 hadn't replaced the old X, though KDE updated fine. The kernel didn't get updated either (that was my own fault, in a way - earlier I had patched my 2.2.13 kernal, that comes standard with SuSE 6.3, to 2.2.14, to fix a bug with the parallel port zip drive. I had placed the vmlinuz in /, and told Lilo to look there, based on the patching HOW-TO - SuSE 7.2 places the new kernel in /boot - so I had to simply repoint Lilo, and reboot to fix the issue - still have to rebuild the kernel anyhow, and customise it, cause I lost joystick support).

Even so, with all that - I am highly pleased with the results. I have updated a lot of my software, and KDE2 is a joy to use and see. I have a love/hate relationship with the NVidia drivers for my TNT card now (I was using the "reference" source drivers - or whatever they were - under X3 - but they don't work for 4) - they are faster, but I hate that damn logo - anybody know how to get rid of it (the only reference I found was something involving a hex edit patching of a binary - not something I really want to do).

I am really pleased. I loved the update so much, I really want to see how/what a virgin install is like, on a brand new system. Something tells me "simple as pie"...

Worldcom [worldcom.com] - Generation Duh!

Re:No thank you (2)

ncc74656 (45571) | more than 12 years ago | (#67641)

SuSE is too reliant on YAST, which will ultimately be their downfall as a distribution. That, and lack of sales/profit, of course.

...and what is wrong with YaST? It's one-stop shopping for package management and system configuration. I've set up primarily SuSE boxen at my previous jobs; coming into a new job where the alleged sysadmin went with Redh*t (7.0, no less...isn't that the one with the borken gcc?) is a bit of a culture shock.

I use LFS [linuxfromscratch.org] at home as you can build the lightest, fastest system that way (and it's not that big a deal if I screw something up on my own boxen), but I wouldn't consider anything other than SuSE for a business system. I've used SLS and Slackware in the past, I have Debian on an old Mac as it's the only game in town, and I appear to be stuck with Redh*t at work (until I take over as sysadmin, at least). From what I've seen, SuSE beats them all.

Re:Market is balancing itself out (1)

LinuxHam (52232) | more than 12 years ago | (#67642)

If we end with only one Linux company, prices are going to skyrocket(unless for some reason their ideology keeps the prices low(not likely))

Don't forget about the GPL. Thanks to it, prices can never skyrocket.. at least for the software. No matter how you get a copy (of the freely redistributable versions), you are free to redistribute copies and charge however much (or little) as you wish. The software will always be free. Which brings me to what I wanted to talk about anyway. Services.

I work for IBM e-business. IBM Global Services has always added value for customers with service offerings. Now by strongly embracing Linux, we can sell our own hardware, charge an install fee for a free OS, and optionally sell our own non-free Linux software. The big gain is in the services. From what I understand, RedHat now sells multimillion dollar support contracts. They may even turn a real profit within a year or so. They "get" Linux. You can make a little money selling CDs, a little more building a better distro, or a lot more providing consulting services.
--
Steve Jackson

Re:SuSE not Free (1)

scrummy (53462) | more than 12 years ago | (#67643)

fucking idiot...you can't sell the distro yourself. The code for yast is otherwise completly compaitble with the GPL.

Re:About 70 people? (2)

NetJunkie (56134) | more than 12 years ago | (#67644)

Let's see 4 people do what SuSe does. Does Slackware support all the languages SuSe does? Definately not. What about the deals they've done with large storage and clustering partners? No.

SuSe needs a lot more people than Slackware because they do more.

Re:So this is why unemployment is such an issue th (1)

slam smith (61863) | more than 12 years ago | (#67645)

50% isn't that much worse than the US. I figure I pay around 35% of my income in taxes one way or the other. What blows me away about Germany is the Kirchen Steuer (church tax). When I was over there, I couldn't believe the gov't collected taxes for the Lutheran and Catholic churches.

Read the Interview (4)

z84976 (64186) | more than 12 years ago | (#67647)

In this past month's Linux World (or Linux Mag... I get both) there's a great interview with Dirk Hondel, premier SuSE dude. Pretty good stuff, Dirk assures us in the article that they are going strong. They are still a privately funded company, remember, so lack of profits today != investors backing out tomorrow. Also keep in mind that SuSE WAS profitable for the first few years of its existence. It's only been recently (and a result of expansion) that they've become less-than profitable. They'll be fine. Their distribution was the first to be better than Slackware and is years ahead of RedHat or Mandrake (sorry guys).

Re:Should I be worried about this? (1)

VFVTHUNTER (66253) | more than 12 years ago | (#67648)

Read the rest of my post. I said the Linux Desktop is strong now, because we are developing browsers and Office apps. There is a ton of development activity within the Linux Desktop range. I was contending that even without Linux companies, Linux Development is still strong and growing stronger.

You also shot yourself in the foot. I mentioned the growing success of LInux Office applications, and then you tried to slam Linux by stating that it is not a productive platform. The fact that we have more and more Office apps proves that more and more people can be productive with it.

What can I do with Linux that I can't do with Windows? How bout go a week without rebooting my box? Since we're talking browsers, how bout printing web pages to postscript files, and then using a simple script to turn them into PDF files? I can do that for free in Linux; I would have to buy Acrobat to do that in Windows.

And lastly MS IE integration. Again, you proved my point: in Windows, you have the "choice" of pretty much one browser. The options are much better in the OSS world.

Should I be worried about this? (2)

VFVTHUNTER (66253) | more than 12 years ago | (#67649)

SuSE is laying off more people, both RedHat and VA Linux's stocks are way down. I also heard a rumor (I think over at Linux magazine) that Redhat et al. are about to start charging per-CPU licenses. Add to this that SGI recently laid off a lot of its (XFS!) staff, and I am starting to worry about the future of free-OS distros.

That said, Linux has never looked stronger. We now have FOUR browsers - Netscape, Mozilla, Galeon, and Konqueror. Plus plenty of Office apps. And I recently read another atricle that shows how Linux is taking over the graphics-workstation desktop (at Pixar, etc).

I can only hope that the current decline in the vitality of OSS companies is parallel to that of the entire tech industry, and nothing more.

Anyone have any input on this?

/me crosses fingers

Re:Don't worry too much (1)

jdfox (74524) | more than 12 years ago | (#67653)

Merging with Mandrake is a ridiculous proposition and it's incredibly bad behaviour of a journalist (or someone acting in this role) to suggest something like this.

I submitted the story; timothy posted it. I certainly meant no harm to SuSE, nor was I attempting to act as a journalist (shudder). Rather, I would like to see a large, pan-European distro vendor which can compete effectively with Red Hat, offer large-scale retail supply and support of a superior product into North America, and maintain the lead in Europe that Mandrake and SuSE currently enjoy.

May I ask why a merger with Mandrake is a ridiculous proposition? As a SuSE employee you might know something I don't about the distros. Are you referring to a technical problem or a cultural one? Or both? Or something else?

GPL keeps linux free (1)

Cyno (85911) | more than 12 years ago | (#67657)


Actually it is impossible for a monopoly to control Linux or any other GPL software. The GPL is written in such a way to prevent this from ever happenning. In order for Linux to become a monopoly you would have to have every one of the 6 billion people on earth refuse to download source and compile and redistribute it. And all of those separate GPL projects to instantly halt their work and stop distributing binaries from places like sourceforge and freshmeat. For something like that to happen we would be talking about the destruction of the internet or Americanisation of every person on earth (making people stupid one commercial at a time). See linux is a truely free market. So do what you want, just remember to give back to the community, because that is what it is all really about. Money is worthless.

Don't believe me? Look at what linux has accomplished in the last few years. Do you honestly think that has anything to do with money? It is the hard work of hundreds or thousands of developers, users, sys admins, and now finally the old school management and marketting types (because it is where the money will be). Unfortunately for the old school management and marketting types are finding it hard playing in a free market without walls of IP or legalese to protect them. But that's not my problem. I just hope one day these people will reallize that life is the only thing of value in our world.

KDE based admin tools? (4)

brunes69 (86786) | more than 12 years ago | (#67658)

Someone hasn't used Mandrake in a LONG time. Mandrake shifted all its admin tools (Which are far superior to any other distro's, in my opinion, especially when combined with Linuxconf) to GTK a LONG time ago, at least in 7.0.

I doubt... (1)

root_42 (103434) | more than 12 years ago | (#67664)

...that SuSE is already that weak. It's more or less the #1 distro here in Germany, and also in some of the eastern countries (Czech etc.). They teamed up with IBM to produce a SuSE distro for the 390 series, they've got SuSE for PowerPC, Sparc and Alpha. They are the european publisher for Loki Games. They provide excellent support for corporations. I don't know much about Mandrakesoft, but I guess they won't be able to buy out SuSE!

Re:who cares (1)

Lussarn (105276) | more than 12 years ago | (#67665)

You are one of those persons who like to have playbuttons and stoplights on your servers, right?

Responsibility is essentially ours .. (1)

tevita (110787) | more than 12 years ago | (#67666)

Without harping on too much, these Linux distro companies rely on a market which is quite infantile. It is really up to the fritter brain nerds like ourselves to get out there and push linux into places it has never been before, no matter what distro you might advocate. More people appreciate linux for what it can do, the more there will be a market generating the revenue for our favorite distros.

Evolution (1)

shpoffo (114124) | more than 12 years ago | (#67667)

All this stuff about linux distros has me on the mind about evolution. All these little critters running around trying to get a foot-hold. some of them are bound to not make the evolutionary steppes, or get squashed by something begger climbing them. We evolved from lizards ga-zillions of years ago, the SuSe lizard will have to do the same if it plans on surviving.

My personal pull is with the same spiral motion that is the formative energy for most everything else. <insert Debian logo here>


The Roaring Spring
-shpoffo

Not all SuSE software is GPLed! (2)

Galvatron (115029) | more than 12 years ago | (#67669)

Specifically, their YaST installer is NOT GPLed, it is under a proprietary license, making it illegal to copy cds. I've never used the distro because of this, so I don't know if any of their other software is non-GPLed. It's quite possible that it would be illegal for Mandrake to do what you describe.

The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.

SuSE not Free (4)

Galvatron (115029) | more than 12 years ago | (#67670)

The one fundamental problem that I've always had with SuSE is their non-Free installer. I wholeheartedly sympathize with their desire to make money, but what's the point in using Linux if you go out and choose the one distribution that's not GPLed?

Red Hat always takes a lot of crap for being "sell outs," but SuSE is the only distro company that has ever restricted redistribution. I don't understand why they don't take more crap for that. I, for one, will not be sad if SuSE goes under.

The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.

Re:Oracle / SuSE (1)

kuiken (115647) | more than 12 years ago | (#67671)

actualy i called oracle about one month ago and they told me they dont support RH only suse
So maybe you should check [suse.com] before you flame

Layoffs in Germany (5)

frost22 (115958) | more than 12 years ago | (#67676)

I'd like to add a few remarks on this.

First, have a look at their web site. They announce to reduce headcounts in a socially acceptable way and in close cooperation with the empolyee's council (which for all practical means can here be compared to a union).

Announcing this now means that - if they are really fast in the HR department - they get contract terminations out this month. More likely it will be next month, since every single termination (or the whole package with all details) has to be agreed by the employee's council.

Since people here have usually 3 months notice on termination in their contracts (and, especially in the tech sector, 6 is not uncommon) thus the affected people will regularily have to leave earliest end of october of november.

But that's not all - an employee's council worth its name will ususally get a substantial severance package for anybody terminated. I'd be surprised if they didn't get at least an additional 2 or 3 month's pay as compensation.

Now, what does that all mean ?
First, expect noone to fall harshly into poverty anytime soon.
Second, Suse will probably not save a single dime this year by doing this. All they do is proactively reducing next year's cost (and, maybe, impress some analysts). So this is not, IMO a sudden panic measure but an act of careful planning for times getting harsher.

f.

Re:No thank you (2)

Mr_Icon (124425) | more than 12 years ago | (#67677)

...and what is wrong with YaST?

Nothing besides the fact that it's not open-source. And I don't mean the "FSF definition of open-source", but the fact that you can't get the source for yast. Now, is it just me, or does someone else find it odd that open-source distribution would use a proprietary installer?

I liked SuSE until I found out that 7.0 shipped with a broken software raid. Now that's just wrong.

Ridiculous proposition? Agreed! (1)

thufir (129668) | more than 12 years ago | (#67678)

See above post [slashdot.org]... I totally agree with you! Long live SuSE!

The /. authors use to be nobodys, who's voices went unheard by most, and it was fine that they could say irresponsible things. But now that many read their site, I think they have to grow up, and realize the impact their statements can make.

Thank you also, for clearing things up. I love SuSE, and hope to find myself walking to the local store to pick up the latest copy of SuSE even 20 years from now.

Re:No thank you (1)

SLi (132609) | more than 12 years ago | (#67679)

...and what is wrong with YaST?

It's similar proprietary crap as Windows CE. Aren't the licenses actually nearly identical? Both allow distribution of both the program itself and derivative works, but forbid selling.

It's a shame that there's a Linux distribution which falls to methods as sinister as Microsoft, which seems to be the ultimate one among GPL haters.

Debian (2)

Agthorr (135998) | more than 12 years ago | (#67680)

The neat thing about Debian is that it can't go bust, since there's no company directly running things. Just a well-organized mob of volunteers :-)

(Well, okay, there are many other neat things about Debian, but this is one of them)

-- Agthorr

SuSE is well S/N real bad on this thread/ (3)

mmkhd (142113) | more than 12 years ago | (#67681)

Only posts #35, #60, #80 #118 had anything useful to say that was really on topic.

#35: Voice of moderation, mostly non technical staff gets layed off. (portal.suse.de/en)

#60: Socially acceptable lay offs that don't save SuSE any money immedeately.

#80: "Just restructuring a bit", "going strong" from an employee of SuSE Labs

#118: SuSE is not publicly traded. Privately
funded. Was profitable from the beginning
and maybe grew a little too fastduring the
tech bubble.

The rest, were just doom'n'gloom sayers...

Come on, people. Not everything is going down hill. Some companys have a sound structure.
SuSE is not only in the distribution business, the do a lot of service to and have more products than "just" the distribution and stuffed animals.

Marcus

Re:FUCK OFF BITCH (1)

pjbass (144318) | more than 12 years ago | (#67682)

You must be asking for the flames. Really, if you do not have an opinion on anything, and just like to shoot off your mouth to encourage people like me to reply because you are the very problem with Open Source these days by giving it that "hacker" aura that doesn't hold its credibility because people like you shoot off your mouths inappropriately on public forums and ruin it for those of us who really give a crap. Grow up and come back when you have something useful and/or meaningful to say.

Re:Is this reallly that shocking? (1)

pjbass (144318) | more than 12 years ago | (#67683)

Getting laid off in Germany is not that much of a desaster as getting laid off in the U.S.

How do you figure? Are you saying that Germany's "social safety net" is better than the US's? I'm really not sure either way, but I think that if a person gets laid off in one place, it will affect the market somehow. The fact that the USD competes with the Euro now WILL make an impact on the US, especially if German shops close up.

I am quite confident that productive programmers are not laid off, they just get better organized and that's simply a good thing.

I don't disagree. Ideally, competent programmers can pick up from a termination, learn from it, and move on to bigger and better things. But right now, in today's economic climate, ideal is far from the truth. The reason MANY places are laying people off is because they simply don't need the workforce. Businesses aren't hiring in the volume that businesses are laying people off. So the news of these people being laid off is far from good; I would like to think optimistically and hope for the best, but in which market can I do that? Certainly none of them around here...

Is this reallly that shocking? (2)

pjbass (144318) | more than 12 years ago | (#67684)

I can't say that I'm not upset about this news. I personally have never run SuSE on any of my boxes but I know people who have, and I have SuSE to thank for making X Servers a few years back that supported my hardware before XFree really caught up.

However, this news can't be all that shocking. Countless numbers of companies - small one-officed .com's to large scale corporations are announcing the same deal on a regular basis. The fact that SuSE is laying MORE people off is terrible, especially for the people being laid off. But what about the hundreds of thousands of people being laid off elsewhere? Cisco, Xerox, GM, to name a few. So I wouldn't take this news as earth-shaking, hailing the destruction of Linux (sorry, random Matrix plug), rather, I would view it as pretty sad to see some really great people getting laid off who helped make a really great product. Hopefully this whole economic mess will be over soon and we'll be seeing headlines that read "Hundreds Hired Into SuSE" or something.


-Do or do not. There is no try.

Oracle / SuSE (4)

Pontiphex (146376) | more than 12 years ago | (#67686)

SuSE is the only distro that is certified for use with Oracle. I doubt that Oracle would let them die. I expect to see SuSE become part of Oracle.

Re:So this is why unemployment is such an issue th (1)

Drone-X (148724) | more than 12 years ago | (#67687)

No wonder employers wouldn't want to take on new employees.

every single termination ... has to be agreed by the employee's council.

Ugh. Don't europeans understand that this is a huge disincentive to hiring aditional workers?

I'm by no means an expert on this but if you need additional workers for a short term then wouldn't the logical thing to do, be to offer them a short-term contract? Working with an interim and renewing the contracts on a weekly basis would seem like the way to go.

Re:Noooo!!!! (2)

JimPooley (150814) | more than 12 years ago | (#67689)

Whoever named the SuSE emblem "Geeko" should be caught and shot NOW. And I hate that fucking penguin too. It's far too smug-looking.

Hacker: A criminal who breaks into computer systems

Difference between Suse and Mandrake (2)

LinuxGeek8 (184023) | more than 12 years ago | (#67691)

I wouldn't expect a merge between Suse and Mandrake.
I don't know what the people at Suse think about that idea, but I do know that Mandrake consists of Free/GNU software. It's free to download. And they want to keep it that way. Over the last few years Suse has slowly been moving into proprietary software. Yast and Yast2 are under non-free licenses, or at least, you're not free to resell it, it's non-GNU.
I don't know the license of their email-server, but i assume that's also non-GNU.
MandrakeSoft is not interested in non-GNU software.
I'm not planning on a flamewar between licenses, but it does matter under which license software is being shipped.

SuSE 7.2 is superb, well worth supporting (2)

MarkWatson (189759) | more than 12 years ago | (#67692)

Although I enjoy Debian (an easy install using the install-from-internet option, BTW), I just installed SuSE 7.2 Personal Edition a few days ago. I have purchased about 4 SuSE distros over the years, and they have all been great.

With 7.2, you get nice TrueType font support, autodetection of IDE CDR writers, good USB support, and a really simple install.

Anyway, we all vote with our wallets, and as someone who used to spend a small fortune every year buying software at EggHead, CompUSA, etc., paying for a $30 distro evry 6-9 months, and the occasional small donations to FSF and Debian is way less expensive, and generally feels better.

-- Mark Watson -- Open Source and Content at www.markwatson.com

IF this means they're in trouble... (1)

Carik (205890) | more than 12 years ago | (#67693)

...then it's a pity. I've used SuSE basically since I started using linux, and I like it. Install is easy, enough stuff is included that you don't have to start trying to figure out how to compile your own software until you know something about linux, and so on. I really kind of like YaST, although I have some issues with YaST2. (Primarily that it's slow, it's ineffective, and it doesn't always do what you tell it to) When I'm recommending a distro to someone who JUST wants a desktop OS, that they don't need a lot of special knowledge for, I tell them to try SuSE.

That said, I'm in the process of switching over to debian. Well, libranet, really - they have enough tools that it's not quite as hard as plain debian to set up, but it's still more detailed than suse. My main reason for switching? I'm sick of discovering that I can't install a new program without discovering that SuSE installed something ELSE in a non-standard location. Which makes their support of the standard-base kind of a joke. But anyway.

Basically I like SuSE, and I wish them well, but I may not buy another update due to their odd file placement. If it turns out I want to stay with debian, I plan to tell SuSE that. Maybe they'll start paying attention when people stop buying their software.

-Carik

I don't Understand. (2)

Auckerman (223266) | more than 12 years ago | (#67694)

Okay. Both Mandrake and SuSe use GPLed software, meaning that at anytime, Mandrake can take SuSE's work and integrate it into Mandrake. This leaves the question: What exactly is there for Mandrake to merge with or "buy"? Now I can understand someone like IBM buying a Linux company for the employees and experience, but in this case, Mandrake can merely hire more people and use SuSE's stuff.

Re: Layoffs != Going downhill (1)

StarTux (230379) | more than 12 years ago | (#67696)

Nice point...

But no-one has actually read who the layoffs affect, as it said non-technical...

Always worry a little more when its technical staff that end up being laid off...

StarTux

Ever looked at portal.suse.com? (4)

StarTux (230379) | more than 12 years ago | (#67697)

Might be worth checking out, has alot of great articles on there.

But no-one seems to mention it much, which is unfortunate.

http://portal.suse.de/en/

Check it out :-).

StarTux

Re:It's the logo STUPID!!!! (2)

einhverfr (238914) | more than 12 years ago | (#67698)

Nobody takes a lizard as a logo seriously.....in order to step it up and play with the big boys perhaps Suse should incoporate a common household object as it's logo like some other companies have....like a flying door or something else (****window****)

Drat-- now we will have to sack Tux.... If no one takes a Lizard seriously, what will they think of a Penguin??

Sig: Tell all your friends NOT to download the Advanced Ebook Processor:

Re:SuSE 7.2 is superb, well worth supporting (2)

einhverfr (238914) | more than 12 years ago | (#67699)

SuSE 7.0 left much to be desired. SuSE 7.1 was really great and I am running it on one server. Of course, X 4.0 causes problems with an old Armarda, so I use RH7.1 on that system.

I thoroughly enjoy both RH7.1 and SuSE 7.1. I don't expect them to go under (at this point).

OTOH, Caldera.... (stock price went below $1 this last Fri. and they are being sued by stockholders...)

Sig: Tell all your friends NOT to download the Advanced Ebook Processor:

SuSe, RHAT, Open Source vs Business (1)

WillSeattle (239206) | more than 12 years ago | (#67700)

I think we're losing sight of a few things:

1. Open Source is not the totality of open source retailers. If SuSe went out of business today, the code lives on. If Red Hat went out of business today (doubtful, cause they make a profit), the code lives on. That is the point - they live off of us, not the other way around. They are useful to us, but not essential.

2. The recent failures of many Open Source connected businesses is more related to the tech bubble than anything else. A lot of firms die - that's how business and market capitalism work. The best ones don't always survive. Many firms that had unrealistic business plans were created in the Open Source arena, some of which were even created just to take advantage of the tech bubble. This is why I bought Red Hat, sold it, bought it again, sold it, and bought it again. It was a speculative bubble, and I'd be crazy to buy a stock valued on 400 times projected earnings. A reasonable valuation is a P/E of 10 to 20, a tech firm with rapid growth might be worth 20 to 30. Many firms had realistic projections of a P/E in two to threee years of 100 to 2000. This is insanity. And that's why the bubble burst. Note - I still own 400 shares of Red Hat directly, and 1000 indirectly, worth about what I paid for them, which is fine.

3. Europe is not the US. SuSe is a European market company, just like Red Hat is a US market company. Sure, they both sell worldwide, but that's where their market shares are. Their market is very different from ours. If they fail, other distros can take up the slack.

4. The world does not owe coders a living. Or even stock options. Especially not open source coders. If you're in this for the money, you've got it all wrong. Get a life.

5. Kyoto wins! Oops, sorry, just glad about sticking it to Georgie boy.

CFO becomes CEO (4)

tim_maroney (239442) | more than 12 years ago | (#67701)

Perhaps just as interesting is that, on the same day, the CEO left his position for a board seat, and turned the helm over to the CFO. [suse.com]

Presumably this means that SuSe will now concentrate on actually making money rather than just making a distro.

Tim

Re:What exactly happened between RedHat & Oracle? (1)

leviramsey (248057) | more than 12 years ago | (#67703)

Perhaps even a larger concern is Suse's use of ReiserFS. Red Hat has been screaming that fsck and other user-level tools for ReiserFS are tremendously substandard, and that ReiserFS corrupts itself under heavy load, to say nothing of the NFS problems (I don't know if these are fixed).

I've been using ReiserFS on production systems for 10 months, and I haven't had a problem.

Methinks Red Hat just dislikes the fact that they missed the ReiserFS boat...

Re: Layoffs != Going downhill (3)

morcego (260031) | more than 12 years ago | (#67708)

Please, lets not assume that layoffs equals a company going downhill.
As we well know, in todays competitive environment, a company has to adapt. I have seen in the past companies improving the quality of their products after a layoff. How can we outsiders tell what these layoffs represent ? We simply can't.
We really don't know what kind of people are being kicked off. How can we be sure that they were not getting the the way ? Or maybe SuSe just plans to handle some positions to third party companies, which is not always a good thing, but is not always bad either.
A think people that see these layoffs as a bad sign are a little ahead of themselves. We should wait and see what happens.

---

Compare to Suse and Microsoft (1)

bryanbrunton (262081) | more than 12 years ago | (#67709)


Here are Microsoft's earnings for its Europe, Middle East, and Africa region for the most recent quarters in million:

March 2000 - 2018

June 2000 - 1151 (Wow! major drop)

September 2000 - 1085

December 2000 - 1430

March 2001 - 1204

June 2001 - 1145 (a significant decline given the growth MS has seen in other regions over this period)
From the year ended June 30 2001 as compared to the previous fiscal year, Microsoft's revenue decreased from 5,020 to 4,864 millions in this region. We can say that Microsoft's revenue is constantly flat or declining in this region.

This is the same region where SuSe derives most of its revenue. Howerver, SuSe has consistently grown in revenue over this time period, their growth has been dramatically different as compared to MS.

If a monopolist like Microsoft can't grow in this region over this time period, who can?

So this is why unemployment is such an issue there (1)

glrotate (300695) | more than 12 years ago | (#67710)

No wonder employers wouldn't want to take on new employees.

every single termination ... has to be agreed by the employee's council.

Ugh. Don't europeans understand that this is a huge disincentive to hiring aditional workers?

EU PU

Buyout could be good (2)

pgpckt (312866) | more than 12 years ago | (#67711)

I don't want to see SuSE die anymore then the next man, but this condition in the Linux market is good I think. You put out 10 competing distros in the market. Consumers say what they like and don't like. Distributions react by modifying their product. Over time, consumers begin to get attached to a particular distribution. Other distributions suffer.

So, what's left at the end of this? Less distributions. As less popular (or less well-funded) distributions go under or get bought out, the Linux distributions begin to look more alike. A standard emerges for the distributions. The superior product comes out on top. A product that the consumers have voted on (with dollars) as the product that has the features they want, the tools they want, the support they want, the
resources they want, etc. The Linux market has behaved like every other free market.

Us slashdotters seem to be the free market types. No interference, may the best distribution win. So SuSE is hurting right now. The market doesn't lie, so it seems to imply people are looking elsewhere. I believe this is good for Linux overall. Linux companies have to compete like real companies, develop a superior product, and offer their customers more. Maybe SuSE will come out on top in the end, or perhaps not. But if SuSE takes a buyout from another Linux manufacture and the result is one less distribution (which will hopefully combine the best aspects of both systems), I believe the Linux community is benefited. The end result of this will tend towards a Linux distribution for the masses, which is exactly what the open source advocacy really needs.

SuSE 7.2 rocks my world (2)

Boj (313432) | more than 12 years ago | (#67712)

SuSE is probably the best distro. around! If you want to spend all year installing then debian is fine. It's hardly a viable distro for non-techies though. RedHat and Mandrake put out lame broken packages based on non-standard compilers. IMHO if everyone used SuSE the world would be a better place. The news about the layoffs really is sad.

Re:So this is why unemployment is such an issue th (3)

anno1602 (320047) | more than 12 years ago | (#67713)


Well,

the real trouble (in Germany) is, if I got the stories right, _not_ the fact that companies don't want to hire people. People don't want to get their hands dirty. Why? Consider you get about 500 DM cash on hand a month, housing support (up to paying your entire appartment w/heating and all the works), reduced telephone rates, reduced prices for a lot of stuff you buy, "Kleidergeld" (money to by clothes) every two months. For what? Being registered as unemployed in Germany (it actually is much higher for some time after you loose your old job). Plus, do some "unofficial" work here and there, if you do it well, add another 1000,- a month. As I said, no taxes. If you are married, and/or have children, of course you get more.

Now do the math: How much would I have to earn pre-tax to sustain the same level of quality of life? Well, you'll easily come to figures around 2500-3000 DM, if it's enough. That means you're working full time and you, after all is deducted, don't have a penny more in your pocket than if you wouldn't work at all. Thank you.

BTW: Im paying taxes here. Not nice. 50% goes off to the state.

Anno.

SuSE vs Debian installation (1)

stew77 (412272) | more than 12 years ago | (#67715)

Just because Debian does it in text mode instead of in Qt or GTK doesn't mean it's installation is more complicated.
As far as I could see, Debian and SuSE (in expert mode) ask you the same questions, just that SuSE does it in more colours. Who's selecting easy mode anyway?


--

Re:KDE based admin tools? (1)

hereticmessiah (416132) | more than 12 years ago | (#67716)

Yup, that puzzled me too. Somebody using an old Mandrake distro I think? The Mandrake configuration tools are great, the best examples of GTK-based apps I've seen yet.

Noooo!!!! (1)

spacefem (443435) | more than 12 years ago | (#67717)

I'll say this again:

Windows: no mascot

Linux: the penguin

SuSE: the penguin AND the GEEKO!

Are we seeing how it stacks up yet? Conclusions? Yup, I love my SuSE!

(I'm running 7.2, having an orgasmic time, it'll come out okay, just wait and see.)

The best workstation distro I've used (4)

piyamaradus (447473) | more than 12 years ago | (#67718)

This is an amazing pity -- I recently moved from redhat on my laptop to SuSE, and I've been nothing but completely satisfied. 7.2 (the new SuSE release) went on amazingly cleanly, and this on a weird box that took me a few days with redhat to make work. Their updates are seamless, the DVD install was great (I did most of it in an airplane over greenland), and I've had absolutely no problems. It's got me about ready to ditch my Ultra 10 completely :)

Re:I don't Understand. (1)

kraf (450958) | more than 12 years ago | (#67719)

Suse too has valuable employees, eg. they employ leading ISDN and ALSA developers.

Re:Linux is dead (1)

Genoaschild (452944) | more than 12 years ago | (#67720)

Do you have a clur or did you leave it at Redmond? Linux is not dead, it is just settling itself. Too many companies in a small(but quickly growing) market equals no money. If more people leave, those who are left are more likely to make money. Economics 101.
----

Re:Linux is dead (1)

Genoaschild (452944) | more than 12 years ago | (#67721)

Second Thought: If you really, REALLY want to stop using M$, give Darwin (and Mac OSX) a try. Apple may make the best OS in the world, I'm still not going to pay their over-inflated prices for their hardware that still won't run half the games I want to play or be quite as fast except at photoshop. You can trade one tyrant for another(say Adolf Hitler to Stalin) but you'll still be ruled by a Tyrant. Apple has been in the market as long as MS and has a mini-monopoly on hardware.
----

Re:Linux is dead (1)

Genoaschild (452944) | more than 12 years ago | (#67722)

Meant to say: Do you have a clue or did you leave your brain at Redmond? Linux is not dead, it is just settling itself. Too many companies in a small(but quickly growing) market equals no money. If more people leave, those who are left are more likely to make money. Economics 101.
----

Re:Market is balancing itself out (1)

Genoaschild (452944) | more than 12 years ago | (#67723)

Sooo.... Another Microsoft would be a *good* thing? It doesn't have to balance out to one company. It could balance to maybe the top 3, each one competing against each other but each capable of holding their own. It's like Cyrix, AMD, and Intel. Cyrix never had a chance and dropped mostly out of the market. For a while, Intel was big guy on street and AMD was less known. Slowly AMD rose until the Athlon blew Intel chips out of the water. Intel lowered their chip prices and started advertising more. Consumers benefitted as a whole because computers were now cheaper and one manufacturer didn't have practically the whole market. If you think of this on a more grand scale, it works with Linux. If we end with only one Linux company, prices are going to skyrocket(unless for some reason their ideology keeps the prices low(not likely)) but if their are several companies, they will compete. Each will be able to make a profit but none will be able to control the market or the prices of the other company. It is a form of check and balances that works pretty well most of the time. Nobody wants a Linux Monopoly and that is not likely to happen(but can) due to the GPL set-up.
----

Re:Market is balancing itself out (1)

Genoaschild (452944) | more than 12 years ago | (#67724)

The GPL says that you only have to provide the source code for your product upon request, you do not have to provide the binaries. So, if it boils down to one or two companies and they distribute 4 gigs of source code and no binaries, all of a sudden the GPL doesn't work. Few people are going to manually compile 4 gigs of source code. It is true that once you get a copy of the product, you can burn it and distribute it among your hearts content which will generally lower the price but how many copies can an individual with a burner really distribute? Most people are not going to give copies of their products to 20 or 30 people. The GPL doesn't prevent skyrocketing prices, it just makes it extremely unlikely. The president of the US could be killed and a Military dictator could rise to power at anytime but how likely is that to happen(it did happen once for a few days, look up Gen. Eisenhower.) Never is too strong of a word. Just because a license makes it highly unlikely that a product will be monopolized, it can never completely prevent it. Their maybe a way around the GPL that highly encourages everybody to own a copy of the Linux distribution(say forcing OEMs) so you copying Linux in your little lab will have no real effect because everybody already owns a copy. Like I said, this is unlikely but possible.
----

Market is balancing itself out (4)

Genoaschild (452944) | more than 12 years ago | (#67726)

Too many competitors in a market will result in low product prices and nobody making any money. When it is like this, it is really good for the consumer but does nothing for the companies. Once we get fewer companies, each with enough market share to maintain itself or actually make money, fewer companies will go out of business and more will actually try to enter the market(potential profit with growth.) This is also what is happening with dot-coms. Companies just can't exist in small markets with super-competition.
----

Re:The best workstation distro I've used (1)

GPLwhore (455583) | more than 12 years ago | (#67728)

That is the problem.
No business model that relies on people making effort to "support" will be a succesfull one.

Re:So this is why unemployment is such an issue th (1)

GPLwhore (455583) | more than 12 years ago | (#67729)

Sure they know.
On the other hand, once you get people used to having perks like that it is very hard to do away with it.
Trying to do that = political death. This is one of the reason why it is so hard to move away from socialistic state.

Re:Layoffs in Germany (2)

j7953 (457666) | more than 12 years ago | (#67730)

They announce to reduce headcounts in a socially acceptable way and in close cooperation with the empolyee's council

This is of course a good thing, but seriously, what else would you expect them to announce? And don't forget that they're essentially still firing those people, most of the "playing nice" is required by German law anyway.

So this is not, IMO a sudden panic measure but an act of careful planning for times getting harsher.

Well, it's probably both. I think Suse is just another of the companies that wanted to grow too fast during the new economy and Linux hype, and now they are realizing it didn't work, and won't work anytime soon.

My guess is that they are in financial trouble. Not bankrupt, but in trouble. They were planning an IPO, but they came too late and were smart enough to cancel it. But their long-term plans probably were done with that extra cash in mind. And, let's be realistic, their move to the US market wasn't exactly a success.

SUSE is fine fine fine (1)

chemstar (457943) | more than 12 years ago | (#67731)

What a fine distribution. RedHat seemingly has rodeoed the US, perhaps more innovative. However SUSE holds a place for the 'bring it to the desktop' consortium. Vulgur underuse of a Turing tape, maybe, but damned if it isn't pleasant and robust even with the weight of KDE. Someone give them money.

Re:About 70 people? (1)

vu13 (462742) | more than 12 years ago | (#67732)

SuSE makes more then SuSE Linux. They have the SuSE email client. They also provide support for all their products, and write several manuals. Also, don't forget that they at least used to do very well placing their products in stores. SuSE Linux 6.x was available at Waldenbooks.

SuSE turned into click-and-drool (1)

p_trinli (463461) | more than 12 years ago | (#67733)

As much as I liked earlier versions of SuSE, I'm rather disappointed that recent used a sticky sweet, user-friendly interface. It seems the more graphical distributions become dumbed-down.

--
Aaron J. Shaver
http://aaronshaver.com/ [aaronshaver.com]

Shows Open Source Model Doesn't Work (1)

JavaJustSayNo (466382) | more than 12 years ago | (#67734)

This is just continued evidence that allthough the Open Source Model may work well for software development, its horrible for a revenue model. Suse now follows all the other OPen Source disasters. Services are *not* enough to sustain a company.

Re:No thank you (1)

JavaJustSayNo (466382) | more than 12 years ago | (#67735)

There is nothing wrong with YAST. I have used SUSE extensively and YAST has made it easy to install packages as well as configure the system. Its their lack of revenue model that is the problem.

Re:SuSE merge with The FRENCH? (1)

madman2002 (468554) | more than 12 years ago | (#67737)

Actually with many Linux distros starting to experience cash flow problems more of them should merge with one another. Though I love Linux I must face facts, it is not yet mainstream enough to financially support too many distros. Only a few commercialy available distros can survive right now until the market grows.

or... (1)

madman2002 (468554) | more than 12 years ago | (#67738)

he could have just accidently hit the o before the r :).......give people a break my spelling is far from perfect too, btw I've used a bunch of distros (Mandrake, Redhat, Debian, Slackware, Suse, Immunix) IMO SuSe definately beat them all.

I would've put my support in for Suse... (1)

DeepFyre (469193) | more than 12 years ago | (#67739)

I downloaded 10 gigs of the bugger a little while ago. Installed it nicely, not much of a problem, I rebooted...Then it stopped after firing up Apache, gave up after that point and I'm juggling MandrakeFreq at the moment.

Lot's of OffTopic replies (2)

efgbr (470166) | more than 12 years ago | (#67740)

The original poster managed to turn this discussion into an impossible (at least for the near future) merger between SuSE and MandrakeSoft. It seems that most people forgot the headlines: SuSE Announces More Layoffs.
Load More Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...