Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Marvel's New Thor Will Be a Woman

Soulskill posted about 3 months ago | from the time-to-test-hemsworth's-acting-chops dept.

Entertainment 590

An anonymous reader writes: Marvel Comics has announced that Thor, the thunder god whose story has been told in comic books, movies, and TV shows since the 1960s, will fall from grace, and no longer be able to wield his hammer Mjolnir. A brand new female character will take up the name Thor and continue the series. Jason Aaron, the series writer, said, "This is not She-Thor. This is not Lady Thor. This is not Thorita. This is THOR. This is the THOR of the Marvel Universe. But it's unlike any Thor we've ever seen before." Marvel's Wil Moss added, "The new Thor continues Marvel's proud tradition of strong female characters like Captain Marvel, Storm, Black Widow and more. And this new Thor isn't a temporary female substitute — she's now the one and only Thor, and she is worthy!"

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

I am Woman! (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460439)

I am Woman, hear me Thor!

That is all.

I've heard elsewhere this Ultimate Universe (2)

i kan reed (749298) | about 3 months ago | (#47460443)

But this summary and article both kinda sorta imply 616(i.e. main) universe.

Re:I've heard elsewhere this Ultimate Universe (1)

iMySti (863056) | about 3 months ago | (#47460465)

Chris Hemsworth in drag for Avengers 2.

Re:I've heard elsewhere this Ultimate Universe (1)

jimmifett (2434568) | about 3 months ago | (#47460557)

Thor has been in a dress before, a wedding dress, at the behest of Loki:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

Re:I've heard elsewhere this Ultimate Universe (-1, Flamebait)

Mr D from 63 (3395377) | about 3 months ago | (#47460983)

I wonder if Thor will be a whor, or just a bhor.

Ridiculous! (4, Insightful)

xfizik (3491039) | about 3 months ago | (#47460455)

This is beyond ridiculous.

Re:Ridiculous! (2)

KamikazeSquid (3611985) | about 3 months ago | (#47460493)

Care to explain why you think so?

Re:Ridiculous! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460559)

I personally think it is ridiculous to do this until they have decided that the current Avengers Movies / Thor movies have run their course and are over. Changing the canon before they are over is a bit strange. (Then again, maybe they are done - but I thought there were a couple more movies in the pipeline). After those are done, I don't think it matters - they can change the characters however they think will make them the most bank.

Re:Ridiculous! (2, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460673)

The comics canon is very different from MCU canon already. Loki's a teen, Bucky Barnes was Captain America until like, last year. Thor's mom runs Asgard, Asgard is floating over the midwest US, Steve Rogers is aging to his actual age, and oh, Nick Fury's a white dude with a half-black son named Nick Fury Jr. who actually looks like the MCU version.

Re:Ridiculous! (5, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460583)

This is just lazy pandering. Do they have such little creativity that they best they can do is make a female Thor? This is as pathetic as the Hollywood remake movie spree of the last few decades.

Re:Ridiculous! (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460733)

Hollywood is so lazy they will remake the movie "Junior" with a female character.

Re:Ridiculous! (4, Interesting)

Noah Haders (3621429) | about 3 months ago | (#47460885)

keeping with tradition I assume she'll be a sexy thor with big b00bs that are popping through her skimpy outfit. positive role models ftw!

Re:Ridiculous! (5, Insightful)

sexconker (1179573) | about 3 months ago | (#47460631)

Thor is a male god.
Thor is an established character, based on the mythical Thor.
Making Thor female is just a publicity stunt.
Marvel can't create compelling original female characters, but that doesn't mean they should slap tits and a vagina onto existing male characters and hope they stick. What Marvel needs to do is realize that they can't create ANY compelling characters anymore, male or female, and fix that problem first.
Everyone knows that the real Thor will be back once this "arc" finishes - saying something is permanent in comics is an insult to anyone who reads them.

Alternatively, Han shot second.

Re:Ridiculous! (-1, Troll)

geekoid (135745) | about 3 months ago | (#47460933)

You are using archaic myths to justify misogyny.

Taking a historic Superhero character and making it a woman is a good thing. The industry needs fewer people like you, and more young girls.

Your excuse is the same one every misogynist through time have used. "Historically a man does that, you can't have a women do that!"
Applies to driving, voting, working, drinking, independent thoughts, divorce, and, yes, comics.

So you can dress it up however you like, but the rest of us know you are simply a misogynist. You may not even realize it, but you are
Angry bro? then clean up you act and behave like a civilized person.

Did you know Thor was the god of fertility, healing? Did you also now they aren't changing the Myth, just a comic character?

Re:Ridiculous! (1)

Noah Haders (3621429) | about 3 months ago | (#47460935)

re: not relevant anymore. I think all of the new comics/fantasy/sci fi IP is going to start coming from video games. that's the only place that's consistently making new ideas. looking forward to the assassin's creed movie, GTA movie, etc etc. Some of them will el floppo like the ones we've seen to date, but others will stick. movies, as usual, will defer to other media to create new ideas.

Re:Ridiculous! (4, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460635)

Thor is a character in Norse mythology. Those stories are part of our cultural heritage. And in those stories, Thor is male.

This change isn't done because it makes more sense. The Norse Thor didn't have any gender identity issues. This doesn't make the story more interesting or engaging. This is done exclusively as a gimmick to attract audiences of feminists and the obsessively politically correct.

I think these are bad reasons for making this change to the story. I think there are plenty of opportunities to borrow female heroes from history (Joan of Arc? The goddess Athena?) to create brand new stories of feminine heroism. There is no compelling reason to give Thor a gender change. Its just a (destructive and stupid) attention grab.

Re:Ridiculous! (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460691)

Read the article, you idiot. Thor is still a man. This woman is taking his duties because of something in the story arc. God, you just had to bring up feminism, what a pathetic loser you are.

AC because idiots like you are the reason I deleted my account years ago, but I couldn't hold it in this time.

Re:Ridiculous! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460869)

Feel better now?

Re:Ridiculous! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460879)

You're either incredibly dense and blind to irony or a brilliant troll.

Re:Ridiculous! (5, Funny)

kruach aum (1934852) | about 3 months ago | (#47460893)

What part of "And this new Thor isn't a temporary female substitute — she's now the one and only Thor, and she is worthy!"" is ambiguous to you? If she is the one and only Thor, and she is a woman, then Thor is now a woman. That's how the transitive relation works.

Re:Ridiculous! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460963)

They say that now. Lets see what they say when it's actually released and sales figures come out.

Re:Ridiculous! (3, Informative)

ceoyoyo (59147) | about 3 months ago | (#47460727)

Not the original poster, but I agree. I think it's great to have strong female main characters, on an equal footing with strong male main characters. But this ain't it. They're taking a character who is male, both in mythology and in their own storyline, and changing him into a woman. Why? Because they can't write female leads so they'll just take a male one and give him boobs? Because a female main character can't be successful without all the momentum gathered by that character being male for a thousand years?

Ridiculous seems like a reasonable summary.

Re:Ridiculous! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460831)

Yep, a "strong" woman character should also not need an outrageous bust if that were the true aim of this lazy creation.

Re:Ridiculous! (5, Insightful)

kruach aum (1934852) | about 3 months ago | (#47460825)

Making Thor a woman is like making Jesus a woman, Mjolnir a screwdriver, or Huginn and Muninn storks. It's like saying "I carpooled to work today" when you came by yourself on your bike, because you want to reclaim the word "carpooling" to refer to biking to work. You can do it, but that doesn't make what you say true. Thor's gender is such a significant feature of his established identity that to change his gender is to change his identity from Thor into Something-that-is-not-Thor. You can say that this new character is both Thor and a woman, but that doesn't make it true.

Re:Ridiculous! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460829)

Personally, I'm quite done with the superhero thing, have been for a while. Co-opting Thor and making a typically American out of him smacks of the kind of writer's desperation that turned me off hollywood produce years ago. This is just more of the same to me, taken to a particularly repulsive politically correct eleven. But hey, this is the comic book version so anything goes, amirite or amirite?

yup, Ridiculous! (1)

frovingslosh (582462) | about 3 months ago | (#47460929)

Consider the advice of the great philosophers Nelson and Mr. T.

Re:Ridiculous! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460981)

Well, perhaps the next Erin Brockovich movie could contain the character Eric "Erin" Brockovich who used to be woman, but now is really, really manly man. It would be even more logical than this. Or how about "Jesusita", who is really, really the actual Jesus, but a woman and still have the 12 man disciples, plus the questions raising relationship with Maria Magdalena?

Congratulations? (4, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460477)

Congratulations to a comic book company for changing a male character from very old mythology into a woman.

Perhaps they can next make a comic book with Jesus as a woman?

Re:Congratulations? (4, Insightful)

i kan reed (749298) | about 3 months ago | (#47460525)

They also made Thor come from space, speak English, made Asgard not an afterlife, and changed all sorts of other details.

What makes this change particularly galling to you?

Re:Congratulations? (1)

Overzeetop (214511) | about 3 months ago | (#47460637)

They cut off his balls and dick and gave him breasts.And it's a near certainty that we will all want to bed this transsexual. Yeah, I think it's that last one that's the kicker.

Re:Congratulations? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460649)

You answered your own question, the other changes we details, this is massively changing the core character. We would feel the same if he became a Chinese man or a great ape in disguise.

Re:Congratulations? (1, Troll)

i kan reed (749298) | about 3 months ago | (#47460873)

Since you didn't clue in, there's a particular reason why I'm asserting the GP didn't read the comics. And neither do you.

Re:Congratulations? (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460667)

It's lazy pandering and completely unimaginative.

Re:Congratulations? (2)

sgtsquid (1372843) | about 3 months ago | (#47460689)

Asgard wasn't an afterlife, it was a different "realm", like Midgard (Earth), Miflheim, Jotunheim and the others. If they wanted some badass female warriors, they could have just used the Valkyries! If they really needed some genderbending, there's plenty of that from Loki. This is just silly.

Re:Congratulations? (1)

i kan reed (749298) | about 3 months ago | (#47460891)

Fine, pedant, Asgard doesn't contain an afterlife in marvel comics.

Re:Congratulations? (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460875)

Strong female characters are not created by slapping big tits on a previously male character.

Re:Congratulations? (1)

i kan reed (749298) | about 3 months ago | (#47460939)

No. But that's not what's happening. The most likely interpretation is that a female Asgardian is inheriting Thor's title in the "Ultimate" universe where they promised dead characters stay dead.

Re:Congratulations? (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460883)

In the story, the Norse legends of Thor were based on the outer-space alien named Thor with whom the Norse tribes shared a brief relationship. His talents were drinking, roughhousing, strength, hammering things, and blind (e.g.foolish) courage -- none of which are associated with a believable female avatar. The only way this could be any more of a mismatch is if Thor was also known for solving math problems, owning land in his own name, jumping high (he uses his hammer for that), and working longer hours. It's simply bad storytelling for the misguided sake of "progression".

Apparently comic book writers at Marvel don't think that feminine qualities deserve to be respected, so they ham-handedly attach ultra-masculine traits to a woman to have a "strong female character" so they can make themselves relevant.

Re:Congratulations? (-1, Troll)

i kan reed (749298) | about 3 months ago | (#47460949)

Your sexist beliefs have no bearing on what's believable.

Guess what, magic hammers are less believable than physically strong women who drink.

Re:Congratulations? (4, Funny)

jimmifett (2434568) | about 3 months ago | (#47460567)

Don't be a fool, Jesus is obviously a velociraptor!

Look forward to the Velocirapture!

Re:Congratulations? (2)

Falos (2905315) | about 3 months ago | (#47460841)

Troof.

But I guess it's okay; "this Thor isn't that Thor" or maybe even "No relation, never heard of him." if that's the case.

More than historical accuracy, what gets me is the parading. It's not even self-righteous parading, it's more like astroturf. If I was one of those social justice zealots, I'd have to ask myself whether I was being pandered to and exploited.

I don't agree with refuting OR supporting a product or media or art because of the creator or other unrelated details. I don't check if my oil change mechanic donates blood, I don't check if my waiter was a (convicted?) sex offender, I don't ask about my barber's stance on gun control - I ask what a haircut costs.

This is all tangential though; Thor's a chick superhero and I take the "Okay - so?" stance. A healthy one IMO.

Pussy whipped bullshit (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460483)

sad

Re:Pussy whipped bullshit (-1, Flamebait)

i kan reed (749298) | about 3 months ago | (#47460549)

Better than someone with so little mental fortitude that they going into a bawling rage over a slight casting change on a comic-book they don't even read.

Re:Pussy whipped bullshit (2)

SensitiveMale (155605) | about 3 months ago | (#47460611)

Better than someone with so little mental fortitude that they going into a bawling rage over a slight casting change on a comic-book they don't even read.

I don't think a comment of "sad" qualifies as a "bawling rage" and I don't think "a staple of the Marvel Universe and Norse mythology" being changed into a woman is "slight."

Re:Pussy whipped bullshit (1)

i kan reed (749298) | about 3 months ago | (#47460911)

I think, you'll find, that the Thor who's dead, and thus being replaced isn't in "the" marvel universe.

Beware (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460495)

Assaults involving women as the aggressor incoming.

I could see this (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460511)

Finally, not only my wife will enjoy seeing Thor without a shirt on.

After that shitfest"The Dark World" they need buzz (2)

SensitiveMale (155605) | about 3 months ago | (#47460513)

Still, this is stupid. Incredibly stupid.

Liberal word bingo (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460519)

But is she also going to be half-black/half-latino, transgendered and disabled? Don't they need to pander to more groups?

Re:Liberal word bingo (2)

sexconker (1179573) | about 3 months ago | (#47460721)

But is she also going to be half-black/half-latino, transgendered and disabled? Don't they need to pander to more groups?

I'd pay several moneys to see Thor with Parkinson's disease wield Mjolnir.

So much for being a Norse god (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460527)

Now you're just a comic book superhero getting dumped on for being a man.

Tales of Asgard... (4, Funny)

seven of five (578993) | about 3 months ago | (#47460529)

In related news, Odin will become a transgender drag queen with a flair for theatrics. Loki, however, will remain low-key.

Re:Tales of Asgard... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460621)

Is a transgender drag queen someone who was born a woman, surgically corrected to be male who then dresses up in drag to be a woman again?

That sounds AWESOME!

Re:Tales of Asgard... (5, Insightful)

savi (142689) | about 3 months ago | (#47460659)

Actually, in Norse myth, it was Loki who was fairly transgender, often taking on female form in order to have sex with male creatures (such as an enormous stallion). He gave birth to monstrous demons from these encounters, including Sleipnir, Odin's eight-legged horse.

Re:Tales of Asgard... (4, Informative)

SuricouRaven (1897204) | about 3 months ago | (#47460753)

Loki, proto-furry.

Another comic book gimmick (3, Interesting)

C0R1D4N (970153) | about 3 months ago | (#47460533)

Just another comic book gimmick like female Robin, and gay minority Spiderman. Comic books can't go more than a few months without having to completely change everything around and "spice things up". Just try following a single title for more than two years.

Thora? (1)

jonr (1130) | about 3 months ago | (#47460541)

So, her name will be Thora (óra is legit Icelandic name, just like ór)

Re:Thora? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460745)

So, her name will be Thora (óra is legit Icelandic name, just like ór)

One would expect that a site called "Slashdot" has no problems with basic diacritical characters like the Thorn missing in front of those names... no such luck.

Re:Thora? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460775)

Maybe THORN?

As in short for "THOR-NOT"

If they wanted an androgynous character, they shouldda named it Pat.

Another comic rehash (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460547)

Even when they're trying their damndest to be original, everything they do is still a rehash... Talk about being stuck in a multi-generational rut.

Not temporary? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460555)

She is the one and only non-temporary thor, until she in turn "falls from grace" and is replaced with a NEW non-temporary THOR!

Could it be.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460561)

Is this why Green Lantern turned Gay?

Talk about confusing.

It makes sense (4, Insightful)

plopez (54068) | about 3 months ago | (#47460563)

One more opportunity for a character with big bazoombas and skimpy clothes to pander to their core reader base.

Re:It makes sense (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460619)

"a character with big bazoombas and skimpy clothes "

count me in!

Pre-Op or Post-Op? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460571)

Yes, it matters. We gotta know which hammer she'll wield.

Wonder what this will do for the movies (1)

robstout (2873439) | about 3 months ago | (#47460601)

The Thor films seem to have a lot of appeal for my wife and female friends, partly due to beefcake. I wonder how much confusion this will cause between the comics and movies.

Re:Wonder what this will do for the movies (1)

GameboyRMH (1153867) | about 3 months ago | (#47460653)

Maybe their market research found that T&A would sell better than Chris Hemsworth's abs, leading to this decision.

Kinda breaks with Norse mythology too...

Re:Wonder what this will do for the movies (1)

geekoid (135745) | about 3 months ago | (#47460971)

Good thing it has nothing to do myth Norse myths then, isn't it? Or cna you show me where in the Norse legend Thor hung out with Capt. America?

Bullshit (1)

Stumbles (602007) | about 3 months ago | (#47460605)

Thor has always been a male demigod. They are just pandering at this point.

Thordis! (3, Informative)

just_another_sean (919159) | about 3 months ago | (#47460615)

One of the early What If? comics Marvel put out was about Jane Foster finding Thor's Hammer instead of Don Blake. There is a hilarious summary of it here [tumblr.com] . Not sure if it's the earliest example of Thor as a woman but's its gotta be close!

Reality says: Not going to happen (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460639)

No matter how they want to market it, the odds are great that it actually ends up exactly like they said it won't: Which ever version of She-Thor, Thorita, Thora, Thornina, Chick-Thor, Shor, Shorely, Shirley, etc. the 'Net finds most amusing will end up being the "real" name. Then they'll capitulate and go back---unless they luck-out and it sells well after the initial marketing push.

Great, now this is reminding me of MST3k's "Space Mutiny". Rip Steak-face, Crud Bonemeal, Big McLarge-Huge, etc.

Nope. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460643)

You want to change a character? Change one you created. It could be the most compelling story in the world, but if I am buying the book for Thor, then I want Thor.

The hammer is my penis? (5, Funny)

Overzeetop (214511) | about 3 months ago | (#47460661)

Wait, no...that's a different show.

Good idea (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460675)

But will she make as much as her white, straight, male predecessor?

In other news, DC Comics announced (4, Funny)

david.emery (127135) | about 3 months ago | (#47460683)

The renaming of its famous comic book and TV character, "Wonder Person."

Chris Hemsworth and Lynda Carter are reportedly in talks to assume the other's iconic role. No word yet if they're planning to share costumes.

Please, enough. (0, Flamebait)

epyT-R (613989) | about 3 months ago | (#47460711)

Stop using your platforms to push marxist propaganda. It's so blatant when history is so blatantly contradicted for no good reason. The mythos always depicted thor as male. Why is it so terrible to have a dominant male in a protagonist role? It's not misogyny.

Re:Please, enough. (2)

Pinky's Brain (1158667) | about 3 months ago | (#47460855)

Marxist?

Re:Please, enough. (2)

footNipple (541325) | about 3 months ago | (#47460861)

I think you missed the main problem. Thor has been depicted throughout the ages as white and straight.

Imagination? (3, Interesting)

infogulch (1838658) | about 3 months ago | (#47460725)

Are we so unimaginative now that it's not possible to come up with and build new characters? Existing characters have to be completely substituted, just to piggyback on the established lore and history?

And for what? To satisfy some new gender-equality metric? Seriously, I know it would take time and effort, but surely you can come up with a compelling unique story for a woman without them having to be propped up by a different character's previous popularity.

They should make wonder woman a man. (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460729)

Thor is a very male name in Scandinavia. It isn't like people in the US name their daughters Jeffery....

But If gender swapping their most popular characters while keeping their gender specific names is going to be a thing, they should just go all out.

They should Make peter parker & clark kent women,.. & make Lois lane a man, etc...

Come on comic book industry, I dare you.... triple dog dare you

Re:They should make wonder woman a man. (1)

infogulch (1838658) | about 3 months ago | (#47460783)

It isn't like people in the US name their daughters Jeffery [sic]....

Apparently they do in the Game of Thrones universe.

Re:They should make wonder woman a man. (1)

Tablizer (95088) | about 3 months ago | (#47460803)

Thorisa, Thorinda, Thoranda, Thorita, Thorbalina, Thorese, Thorazine...

Appeal to Liberal (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460769)

she-thor tranny...

Since when was Thor a title? (1)

wonkey_monkey (2592601) | about 3 months ago | (#47460773)

A brand new female character will take up the name Thor and continue the series. Jason Aaron, the series writer, said, "This is not She-Thor. This is not Lady Thor. This is not Thorita. This is THOR.

Uh, yeah. Like when that other guy was Batman? But then he wasn't Bruce Wayne, was he?

In other news... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460801)

Researchers have discovered a lost Shakespeare play, entitled "Orphelia, Prince of Denmark"....

Meanwhile... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460809)

Meanwhile, DC is afraid of making a Wonder Woman movie because, hey, who wants to watch a movie with a woman lead character?...

This Isn't The Way (1)

GenaTrius (3644889) | about 3 months ago | (#47460811)

Depowering a beloved character so a woman can take his place is not the way to show respect for women. This isn't feminism, it's just ridicullous. If Marvel wants to show respect to women, they should make sure their existing female characters are well-written and well-drawn. As it stands, I don't believe for a second that this new Thor isn't going to be subject to the same sexist tropes as so many other superheroines.

Thora still wants Jane (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460817)

Gotta go for the lesbo action. Howard Stern takes over Marvel.

Ugh (1)

puffenstuff67 (3748677) | about 3 months ago | (#47460849)

Political Correctness alive and well....

Clearly the new woman is a man or vice versa... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460857)

Epic way to annoy people this move. This move is as annoying as the song, "A Boy Named Sue."

Ah well, green is the new black. Up is the new down. Idiocy abounds.

Name Change (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460895)

So she isn't strong and independent enough to keep her own name. *facepalm* Failed before the first issue.

Re:Name Change (1)

Desler (1608317) | about 3 months ago | (#47460925)

And apparently not strong enough to not need a huge rack to sell issues.

Outfit (5, Insightful)

tekrat (242117) | about 3 months ago | (#47460899)

Let me guess... This new female Thor will wear a skimpy outfit, and much less armor than the previous, male Thor. But this is objectification is somehow empowering to women...

Maybe fake... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460901)

I notice that the artist's name in these renderings looks suspiciously like an anagram or such. I'm sensing a jest.

Not to be outdone (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460909)

DC Comics announces the first gender neutral character. Super They.

Excellent! (1)

Bigbutt (65939) | about 3 months ago | (#47460915)

More T&A for the male readers and unreal body expectations for the females. Win-win. :)

[John]

Umm... (1)

Thundercleets (942968) | about 3 months ago | (#47460931)

Must be Loki's doing?

2 years (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460969)

I give it two years at most before they bring him back to normal.

Hold On (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 3 months ago | (#47460973)

As long as we "Thor" gets the eye-candy treatment in the movies that we did with the male Thor? Fine. If they butch it up, I cry foul.

Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?