Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Homemade Digital Picture Frames?

michael posted more than 12 years ago | from the just-like-mom-used-to-make dept.

Graphics 148

kato writes: "I've been searching for months for the right parts to make a digital picture frame for my wall. I'm not trying to mount an entire PC in a frame, so I think an old laptop would be overkill. I've heard about devices such as the Audrey made by 3COM, the AOL Touchpad made by Gateway, the Cieva picture frame, and a few others, but each has its faults. Some are impossible to find, some require a service, and some aren't yet "hacked." I'd like the price to be cheap (under $100), the picture to be about 10" diagonally, and to be able to connect to the device (modem or network). Now that the MIT flea market is over, I'm stuck trying to find the parts online. I'm leaning towards the AOL Touchpad, which runs Mobile Linux, but no one has posted any attempts on how to get rid of AOL. Anyone have any ideas or success stories?" An earlier question pointed out this site, but I suppose buying one would take all the fun out of it. You also need to watch out for "subscription to our service required" frames...

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

FIST frame (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550563)

right up your ASS!

Re:FIST frame (-1)

King Africa (262341) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550610)

not zee ass!

important question (-1)

CmdrTaco on on (532959) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550629)

dear slashdot,

Homemade Digital Picture Frames?


the product linked ins't helpful -- (3, Informative)

deceptakahn (525542) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550567)

the product linked ins't helpful -- it costs $500 when our target is under $100. story research, la la la.

Re:the product linked ins't helpful -- (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550569)

That plus the fact that the 10 inch version [] won't be available until 2002..

oh but it has been (5, Informative)

jjshoe (410772) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550575)

the aol/gateway deal has been hacked
and you can find instructions in the forums on

more specificaly lt =&Order=&Session=

i have one (1, Interesting)

halik (301618) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550669)

you can pick one from ebay for about 70 bucks. Frame wise all you need to do is get rid of the spekers and put some neat looking frame around the lcd. As for the or, download Midori linux from transmettas website. Now to get the pics you can use the HPNA or ehtnernet adapter thats built in on the touchpad.

RMS sucks trollin' (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550576)

Trollin' for Jesus H. Christ and RMS....

Hobbits and Hot Grits shouts

Buy a Color printer. (2, Insightful)

Matey-O (518004) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550577)

I never understood the draw for digital picture frames. When they're GIVING away photo quality printers with computer purchases and a full resolution printout amortises to about $2 a page, the only thing that DPF gives you is a wipe to another picture...and a power reuirement.

Buy a $60 dollar printer, and when the cartridges dry up, pitch it. You're out less money, and the pictures work everywhere but in the dark. (Okay, TWO benefits to a digital picture frame.)

Pick the right paper, and the photos will last a heckuva lot longer than the DPF will.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (4, Insightful)

trilucid (515316) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550583)

Buy a $60 dollar printer, and when the cartridges dry up, pitch it. You're out less money, and the pictures work everywhere but in the dark. (Okay, TWO benefits to a digital picture frame.)

Well, there's a few problems with that approach. Number one, ink cartidges ain't cheap (and could, after a while, add up to more than the cost of a device). Second, you lose the ability to cycle through pictures on the fly.

I may just be a wierdo for thinking so, but a big advantage of the digital device would be the ability to incorporate it into some "instant room theming" system. Perhaps coding dynamic theming apps has just gone to my head, but I think it'd be cool.

Besides, we already know how to click "File -> Print -> Ok", but the fun is in the hackery of something to suit our own purposes. I could buy pre-built Lego models too, but that wouldn't be very nifty.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (1)

Matey-O (518004) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550594)

Yeah, it's all about the hack, I know. But the current tech will give you a) a 5" picture frame at $500 that isn't very flat, or b) a room fill of picture theming for BillGatesMoney(tm).

I've got the X10 stuff, I had the plans of setting the 'light mood', but it never happened. It's a great idea, but I ran out of time/interest in it.

Until there's a color Gyricon [] type product, it's not going to be a very satisfying hack.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (4, Funny)

trilucid (515316) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550606)

You make a good point there. The price/performance ration isn't terribly good at the moment for this sort of thing in general.

The Gyricon system looks extremely cool! Of course, I'd want the "paper" to be re-writable more than a few thousand times (to allow for fun stuff like streaming MPEG movies, so I wouldn't burn out my display in a few seconds ;) ). Xerox has a history of backing up their "promises" with proof, so I'll eagerly wait in antici... PAtion (sorry, gratuitous movie reference).

Now, there is always the possibility of checking around with local hospital systems for "old hardware" that they're tossing out. A couple of years ago, I managed to secure two 21" monitors and a couple of decent PCs from a hospital that had decided the hardware was "obsolete". True, they really ought to have been giving the stuff away to charity of educational insititutions, but they were literally thowing the monitors in the dumpster. Now, I just need to carve up my wall with a saw...

Re:Buy a Color printer. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2551023)

[Not so off-topic, if you need a digital picture frame as part of a automated home experience]

The X10 PowerLinc module rocks. It translates
serial commands to and from X10.

I've GPLed some Perl code that
can be used as a base for your hacking pleasure: []

I use it to have a cheap way to control stuff in my house via the web.
sells it for about $30.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (5, Funny)

Registered Coward v2 (447531) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550611)

Second, you lose the ability to cycle through pictures on the fly.

Well, you could put the pictures in page protectors, and then assemble a set in a three ring binder. Tape the binder to the wall, put all the pages at the top, and you'll cycle through the pictures. Adjusting the friction with some tape allows you to adjust the cycle speed. Benefits;

1. No external electrical power requirements
2. Puting pictures back to back in the page protectors allows 2 pics to be viewed at once.
3. When a picture of your ex scrolls throw that you forgot to pull, you can throw a dart at it w/o worrying about breaking an expensive LCD screen.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (2)

trilucid (515316) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550628)

Holy shit, now THAT'S a funny post :). Moderators, please mod parent up "+x funny".

Tell ya what, I'll put up the venture capital for the "Super Animated Version" of the device you desribe. It'll come with 50,000 sheets of paper, and a rubber-band powered motor/release mechanism (environmentally friendly, like those little balsa wood planes you flew as a kid).

I can see the $$$ rolling in now... :)

Or a slide projector (2)

peterdaly (123554) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550746)

Or you could pay a high end photo place to make you slides, and put them in a cheap slide projector.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (4, Funny)

Mike1024 (184871) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550816)


I may just be a wierdo for thinking so, but a big advantage of the digital device would be the ability to incorporate it into some "instant room theming" system.

Yeah. You could have a touchscreen inside your front door, so if you bring a girl home, all your porn posters are replaced by tastful modern art. That'd be useful.

Well, it would be useful if any /.ers ever had girls visiting thier homes.

On a serious note, It'd be cool if you could hack your picture frames to show streaming media (some use Linux and ethernet, no?) then you could have a TV input card on a computer, and if you went to the kitchen to get a snack, you wouldn't have to miss the program.


Re:Buy a Color printer. (3, Interesting)

pointym5 (128908) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550588)

The draw? Simple. I bought one as a Christmas gift for my parents. I upload pictures of my kids, and every few days they wake up to some new images. They don't need to think about it at all. They have a computer, but there's no way they'd ever get comfortable with the process of downloading an image and printing it, no matter how simple that seems.

The Ceiva is an OK solution. I haven't found any hacks for it. Their service is nothing special, but functional.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (-1, Troll)

King Africa (262341) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550623)

I upload pictures of kids too. Wanna trade?

Re:Buy a Color printer. (3, Informative)

grammar nazi (197303) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550598)

IMO, the major benefit that a LCD has over a printer is the light-to-dark ration. Photographs and prints typically have a light-to-dark brightness ratio (contrast?) of 20-1. A CRT monitor ups this ratio to ~35-1. Look at an amateur's online photogallery. The pictures look good, especially outdoor pictures with skys. That is because a light area in a CRT display's picture actually is 'lighted'. Unfortunately, the 'dark' areas on a CRT monitor are also lit up so you still aren't getting the highest light-to-dark ration.

An LCD display has 'lighted' light regions and the dark regions are actually dark (not lit from behind). This is the best of both worlds which is why LCDs have the highest light-to-dark ratio (250-1) and make for the best photo display terminals.

Be very wary of cheaper LCDs. They tend to fade after a while.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (1)

Alan Partridge (516639) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550653)

Informative? well, yes - but utterly factually incorrect. Idiot poster + idiot moderation is a VERY bad combination.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (1)

lambent (234167) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550724)

Logical and factual omissions == bad under any circumstances. Please, since you seem to be an expert, share your knowledge and explain how the facts are wrong. Otherwise, most will assume you are the idiot.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (3, Funny)

Weird Dave (224717) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550799)

Shouldn't a grammar nazi know the difference between a ratio and a ration? Anyways, his comment seems to be bunk. A high quality photograph or print can be both very reflective and very absorbant (light-wise).

Besides, pictures look different on all of todays monitors because the colors and brightness of the phosphors (or LCD pixel) can vary a lot. I don't care to guess about the output of a cheap color printer, but I know that print shops can put out a much greater range of color than a computer screen.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (2)

grammar nazi (197303) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550805)

Paper can be as reflective as it needs to be, but until it emits light, it won't be as bright as a CRT or LCD.

The value that I used for the LCD does seem a bit high. I used a number from a website that disscusses this issue. It seems that typical LCDs have a light-to-dark ratio of ~120.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (1)

Milkyman (246513) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551061)

Got it reversed, you never have true black on an lcd because the backlight is always on and it can never block out all of it.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (2)

plastik55 (218435) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551581)

You nimrod, LCDs have NEVER had a better light-to-darkness ratio than CRTs.

Compare the numbers here [] to the numbers here [] and be aware that on LCDs, contrast ratio comes at a premium price--there's no way you're going to get a $400 LCD with comparable contrast to a $100 CRT.

And you're forgetting about color gamut entirely, which is just as important. LCDs have terrible color range compared to CRTs.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (2)

Tackhead (54550) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551644)

> IMO, the major benefit that a LCD has over a printer is the light-to-dark ration. Photographs and prints typically have a light-to-dark brightness ratio (contrast?) of 20-1. A CRT monitor ups this ratio to ~35-1. [LED has 250-1]

So, what this comes down to is that if you're a normal person, and usually have the lights on at night, or are at home during the day, you use a photo printer and a picture frame to display your photos on the wall.

If you're a geek, the lights are off and the shades are drawn even during the day, and you're usually only home at night anyways. So you go for the LCD or CRT to display your photos on the wall. Because an unlit surface is invisible in the dark.

(The scary thing is that I'm not sure if this'll get a +1, Funny or a +1, Informative :-)

resistance to new technology (3, Insightful)

Alien54 (180860) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550731)

This sort of reminds me of the arguments seen against almost any new technology.

Usually there is cost vs perceived benefit. Why would anyone want a computer, for example? and indeed, only people with a high end need for the advantadges would be early adopters.

All you need is to go to someplace like [] to apreciate the costs of the machines vs the benefits. For many folks, the costs in money and learning curve were not sensible.

Now the arguments of the media lasting long are valid, and I cannot imagine that these things are going to be cheap yet.

The side effect of all of this is the walking into the loss of material over time as things get lost and purged. No more going through old drawers and finding childhood pictures long forgotten. A floppy disk found in a desert cave would be unreadle, unlike the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Re:Buy a Color printer. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2551067)

Have you ever seen a print from those "photo quality" printers? Yeah, it's not bad but it's certainly not really photo quality. Well, maybe it is at 10 feet, but good pictures should stand up to close-up scrutiny.

How about .... (2, Insightful)

dustpuppy (5260) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550581)

putting a second video card in your PC and connecting an old monitor (or a new LCD monitor for that matter) to it?

Sure not quite what you were after, but you would get a large picture at a relatively low cost.

Re:How about .... (1)

RyuuzakiTetsuya (195424) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550584)

When the system reboots/crashes/etc you'd ahve to restart the picture frame.

Re:How about .... (0)

jayant_techguy (441933) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550593)

Well its more beneficial to get a decent printer and print the snaps yourself and that will be way too cheap. Moreover you can also order prints for your snaps online like at Yahoo! Photos []

Its worthwhile having those snaps printed rather than having a digi-frame

Re:How about .... (0)

jayant_techguy (441933) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550601)

Google Search [] gives many worthwhile links. Digital photos have a little problem of printing - i.e cost more but are quite handy :)

How about an I-Opener? (4, Interesting)

neema (170845) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550590)

I just finished hacking my I-Opener that I bought on ebay (for 50 dollars) and I think it would be pretty plausible. Actually, I was thinking of surrounding the border with a frame and putting it up on the wall like a picture frame.

Re:How about an I-Opener? (2)

tzanger (1575) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551236)

I just finished hacking my I-Opener that I bought on ebay (for 50 dollars) and I think it would be pretty plausible.

My IOpener has a DSTN screen; if you're anywhere but dead center of it, it "sparkles". Hell even the corners sparkle when you're at dead-center. TFT doesn't have this problem and also has a very wide display angle.

I've heard that the newer iopeners have TFT screens, which makes me jealous as hell. :-(

What would be really cool... (2, Interesting)

shaneroo (315960) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550596)

This doesn't answer the question at all, but what would be really cool is some kind of digital display that, once the display is set, doesn't require any power. You could plug it in to your computer, download a picture, then unplug it and put it on your desk, wall, whatever. I'd pay $100 for that!

Is there any such technology out there that does this -- some kind of persistent, no- or low-power display?

Yeah, for all you wise-akers out there, I know you can do the same thing with paper and a printer, but paper ceased to be cool about 2000 years ago.

Re:What would be really cool... (1, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550661)

Electronic Ink. I don't think it's out yet and for the moment it only does greyscale, but it is what you are were talking about it. It only requires power to change the display once it's changed it stays. 0, 23008,3336461,00.html

Re:What would be really cool... (3, Informative)

Basje (26968) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550779)

The company's url is:

My color version of e-ink (1)

Danny Rathjens (8471) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551341)

I had the idea a few years ago to make a cheap wall display for pictures that I could change every once in a while.
My idea was similar to those billboards you see that can display three different ads by use of triangular columns.
My display was based on little physical triangular pixels that have each side painted red, yellow, or blue.
These trixels would be free-spinning on vertical axels kind of like an abacus.
Embedded in the point of each trixel would be a magnet.
Behind the grid of trixels would be a relatively simple corresponding grid of electromagnets.
By applying current in the correct manner it would spin the trixels to the appropriate color for each point.
Once the picture is setup correctly, no more power is needed.

stay away from 3com audrey (0, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550599)

it is garbage. how in the hell some products make it to market i will never understand. the screen is total ass, 'wireless' keyboard has almost no range, and as for real uses - it is just basically worthless. $89 is a ripoff, and they wanted $400 to begin with?

Re:stay away from 3com audrey (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2551441)

I disagree.. it's $89 for christs sakes, some of your guys are really cheap, the screen is perfectly adequate for a home controler and picture frame especially when you apply the hack to enable increased colour depth [] .

It's certainly not worth $499, but $89 is (was) a good price... some sites were asking $150 for the surplus audrey LCD's.

Re:stay away from 3com audrey (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2551447)

I do not agree with you (I own an audrey) and like a growing and active community we think this gizmo can have a second live for hobbyist... but yes, +400 USD was too expensive (I bought mine from tiger direct at 89 plus custom as I live in Europe) and if I had the chance I would love to buy 3 or 4 more but they do not sale them anymore...

Re:stay away from 3com audrey (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2551491)

Yeah... Her Majesty's Customs and Excise [] charged me the princely sum of £26 ($38) in import duty, then they charged VAT (17.5%) on top of that. It seems the logistics companies are allowed to charge a £10 processing fee when collecting the tax, which obviously gives them a big incentive to make sure you pay the taxes, they used to just turn a blind eye until 18 months ago because it was hassle for them.

Simple suggestion (1)

Nerant (71826) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550600)

I'll admit upfront i can't come up with any solution that be less than $100. I'm interested if anybody can though.

My suggesttion:

Small form factor PC : the SV24 Cube or something like that.
Wall Mounted LCD display : for the "digital picture frame" .
Run whatever OS you want. (My preference is some distribution of Linux).
Write some custom software that'll do whatever you want to make it act like a picture frame, ie. scan the cdrom whenver a cd is inserted, get all image files on the cdrom and display it on the LCD as a screenshow.
Speakers of your choice : the box can double as a Ogg Vorbis / Mp3 player in the room.
Wireless / Wired Ethernet : Pull new pictures directly from your home lan, the minute you load whatever new pictures you've taken on your digital cam onto your PC that you use to manipulate your photos on.

I had similar intentinions (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550604)

I ended up with something I call "FreeBSD on a stick". Orignal intentions were to hang this puppy on the wall. Didn't work out like I had hoped.
FreeBSD on a stick []

For my next feat: Linux on a rope (?)

Re:I had similar intentinions (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550617)

for more stick pix:click here []

Think real hard now. (1, Insightful)

torquil (228219) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550618)

Ok, when you buy these cheap LCD-devices. You are getting crappy DSTN displays, which you can't even view unless you are directly in front of them. Doesnt sound like a very good picture frame to me, so if you want a quality picture frame i think you are going to have to buy an active matrix display for it(ones below 15" can be had for under $150.) A DSTN on something you want people to look at around the room should at least be visible to them from more than 1 angle. Otherwise you are just a "stupid person with too much money and all these novelty toys that don't actually do anything". Just my opinion...

Re:Think real hard now. (3, Informative)

cheese_wallet (88279) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551072)

I bought a ceiva for my parents. The thing that made it attractive as the gift for them was specifically that thing which most slashdotters hate about it. The service, or more precisely, the way the service works--no end user interaction required.

As for viewing angle and picture quality, I thought they were both more than satisfactory. Most of the time, when you are looking at a picture--not because you are passing it by on somebody's desk, but because you actually want to see the picture--you look at it fairly straight on.

Exceptions would be if several people were looking at it at the same time, creating a small crowd around the picture. And this is a very reasonable thing to worry about. But I tried out the picture frame for a couple days before I sent it to my parents. I viewed it from different angles. Yeah, it did get dimmer and dimmer the more severe the angle, but it was still viewable and satisfactory at angles of 30-40 degrees.

This isn't a projection of a newspaper or something, it's a picture. A picture of a dog is still recognizable, even if a little dimmer, at various viewing angles on the ceiva.

I can just imagine some neurotic slashdotter checking out a ceiva at bestbuy or wherever. They'd hold a ceiva to a wall, and with their face pressed against the wall, complain in a muffled voice that the picture quality sucked at a 90 degree angle.

This may be going overboard (2)

trilucid (515316) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550619)

but what about some system where you pipe the image itself (not a digital representation thereof) directly over fiber optic cable to be rear projected onto a surface of your choosing?

It seems to me this device would consist of a unit to first convert the signal from any generic PC video card to its "analog" image form, then boost the image amplification, and send it down the cable. The receiving unit would take the image coming in off the cable, perform any desired magnification or whatever, and project it onto a glass surface.

I am not an optics expert AT ALL. It just seems like this might have some potential for looking into.

Re:This may be going overboard (1)

mstyne (133363) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551400)

Interesting idea, but for the cost of the optical equipment alone -- you could probably just buy a digital picture frame.

Sounds like a fun project though.

Wallpaper (3, Interesting)

Graspee_Leemoor (302316) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550622)

I have long been waiting for the day when I can have literally wall-to-wall lcd (or whatever flat display is in at the time).

I think texture-mapping your walls would be a lot cooler than wallpapering them- and less messy too! How long would it be before there was a "wood-chip" module where you could scratch the chips off like people annoyingly do after you've painted it?

Also I could mince around the room all day dragging my posters to different locations...

Imagine! No more agonizing in the shop over which clock, calander etc to buy- just run the applet of your choice!

Then there would be the /. interactive poster (if I could afford the million dollar subscription for it... ("Dude! Your poster's expired!")).

Actually I think makers of posters, art prints etc. would start getting aggressive when they found the "mp3" effect was hitting them.

Anyway, thanks for listening to my silly girlish fantasy, and now you can all reply with your lame jokes about "Windows for walls" (Any colour you like as long as it's blue....) etc.


Re:Wallpaper (2)

gwernol (167574) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551466)

I think you're right, but this is just the tip of the iceberg. I predict we're within 50 years of cheap, programmable fabric displays. Imagine large-scale flexible material that can be programmed to display any image, still or moving. You want a TV on that wall? Just hang a sheet of fabric up and away you go. In fact every wall would be covered in this instead of in wallpaper - just walk up to a wall, press it and up comes a menu. Select TiVO, outline the area you want to view on and you're watching any show you want.

Imagine clothes made of this - they can look like anything you want. Any choice of color, texture or image. Forget those cheesy heat-sensitive tees that were popular for about a nanosecond ten years ago. Everyone could be a walking art show.

Suddenly every environment is infintely mutable. You don't like the wallpaper? Change it. Have clouds floating across your walls. Play Quake N in true surround-vision in your den. Every surface is now a monitor.

The combination of ever faster graphics processors, advanced in material science and a growing trend towards self-expression will get us there.

Re:Wallpaper (1)

SixTwelve (451492) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551520)

Also I could mince around the room all day dragging my posters to different locations...

I expect my favorite part of this will be virtua posters hung off-kilter. It'll certainly be an advertising point; "Our resolution is so high you can actually tilt your pictures without any jagged lines! Your guests will never know you're not a collector!"

And a thousand bucks says the 1st demo tilted poster will be an image of Natalie Portman.

Re:Wallpaper (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2551589)

Yeah I'm waiting for Xerox's [] digital paper to get released and updated to a state where it can be used as wall paper. Preferably dynamic enough to act as an affordable HDTV.

Use an old PC (1)

damiam (409504) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550626)

You could find an old PC somewhere with a color wideo card and hook it up to a small flat-panel monitor. That way you could ssh/scp in from outside to upload new pictures and change the current one. I don't know where you'd get a 10" plat-panel monitor though...

This might help (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550640)

Take the LCD from an old labtop, i.e. Compaq LTE Elite has an 10" Active Matrix LCD. make a box for it with old parts (386/486/etc.) slap Linux on it. then mount it on the wall.

come to think about. use the whole laptop. take the labtop out of the plastic casing. mount the parts in a box that with fit on the wall.

Re:This might help (1)

fireman (304011) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551594)

I seem to remember that about the time that the LTE Elite came out, there was another laptop that allowed the LCD screen to the folded back over the keyboard base. I don't remember the name, but it might eliminate have to remount all the parts.

Stuck with a laptop (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550643)

For that kind of money you can't even buy a raw LCD panel, probably not even used. Your best bet is to buy an old laptop. The old NEC versa laptops had reversible screens so you could flip the screen around and face it outwards making it fairly trivial to disguise the keyboard. You are really going to have a hard time beating an old laptop for price/performance. The only other thing I can think of in your price range would be a second video card and a small color TV or used RGB monitor and either one of those is going to be a challenge to disguise (if you are after that 'picture frame' look). The color TV is easier as you can use standard coax cable and off the shelf amplifiers for long cable runs. I suppose you could also use one of those wireless video devices but the quality on those things pretty much sucks, although at smaller screen sizes it may be ok.

I have my Audrey working as a picture frame right now and its pretty good, I just have to figure out how to stop the thing from timeing out and shutting itself off!

Re:Stuck with a laptop (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550988)

I've got an old NEC Versa 2000 that has a 640x480 LCD, and it basically SUCKS for displaying digital pictures. The colour is washed out and you cannot even see anything unless you are standing RIGHT in front of it. Mind you, for a machine thats worth almost nothing, that ain't bad.

stop timeout (sleep mode) (1)

vena (318873) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551351)

change /config/SYSTERM_ScreenSaveSecs from 500 to 0

Hmmm, Sony did something like this. (0)

DeepFyre (469193) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550645)

It was a picture frame with an LCD screen that had a memory stick slot on it. All you did was shove one in and it would display pictures off the memory stick.

Sorry if that wasn't useful in helping you build one, but I thought that might be useful.

Get A Used 486 Laptop From Surplus PC/Thrift Store (3, Informative)

NeuroManson (214835) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550647)

Sometimes you can get those as cheap as $20 if you find one at a thrift store/surplus PC store... Upon analysis of my existing laptop (when I was fixing the display), it wouldbe fairly simply to remove the panel completely, replace the connector (which is basically a bundle of wires in shrinkwrap) with slightly longer cabling, and flip the display over so it faces away from the laptop when closed, add a mounting point on the back for hanging, and you've got a digital picture frame for less than $30 total... Install Windows 3.11 or Linux and you're good to go...

the price point is the display (1)

hqm (49964) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550654)

computers are basically free now, so the price
is determined by the display. A CRT is ugly
as hell, in my opinion, so you want an LCD. An
obsolete laptop may still have a perfectly acceptable display (You wanted 10"). Look on ebay for
laptops with missing CDROM or cracked case or
other cosmetic problems. Then open it up, mount the display, and maybe fold the keyboard underneath. Wireless 802.11 card will make it a
great web-ified picture frame.

I use an old 486 75 Mhz thinkpad with 16 mB of RAM, hooked to
a new 15" flat panel I bought explicitly as a picture frame. The advantage is that it contacts a web server in my house, which selects pictures and lets my friends upload new photos or send them as attachments by email, and they are displayed in our living room.

The price of my system was $0 for the old laptop, and $500 for the beautiful display. But LCD panels
are coming down in price. I didn't use the display on the laptop because its only 640x480, and
doesn't have enough colors.

Re:the price point is the display (2)

trilucid (515316) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550683)

First off, outstanding job with that setup. I think that's a setup most of us would like to have in our pads.

My only worry is the security of the whole thing. Consider the following scenarios:

  • Some luser keeps spamming your image email address, and you get these odd "background.gif" images popping up (MS Outcrud backgrounds).

  • Somebody discovers the CGI, or the image post email address, and kindly posts it to /. for you. You're forevermore haunted by the Goatse man popping up on your living room wall at inopportune moments.

Note to moderators: yes, it was supposed to be funny :).

Re:the price point is the display (1)

karnal (22275) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550735)

"Somebody discovers the CGI, or the image post email address, and kindly posts it to /. for you. You're forevermore haunted by the Goatse man popping up on your living room wall at inopportune moments."

Reminds me so much of Tyler Derden.

Re:the price point is the display (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550995)

Well, adding password protection to a perl CGI takes about 3 seconds.

LCD prices ? (2)

johnjones (14274) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550656)

it seems a bit of a pipe dream because the prices of LCD's seem quite high for you
(although for a full monitor they ARE LOW buy now is my advice)

I know that 1024x768 is about £300 (~$765 acording to pricewatch)

BUT what about differant form factor how much do these cost and how about getting it from friendly electronics store (just bare screen no enclosure ) I dont know

anyone have any clue ?


john jones

Quick and Easy? (5, Informative)

cgenman (325138) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550660)

Hmm... Hack a 99$ I-opener. Connect it as an ftp server, and have it ftp to a directory used by one of those ever popular picture-displaying screen savers. Mount the moniter on the wall, mount the box in a closet or with the rest fo the servers in your house, problem solved. (for I-opener info, visit

If you get tired of cutting holes in the wall (and who doesn't?) there is a less geeky solution. Just buy one. Kensington has out a 640x480 7" solution that is in the 150 range. The USB connection won't let you remotely manage your photograph collection from a motel in kenya, but this will actually work and with minimal effort. ht ml (too lazy to html at this time of morning)

I-opener can look really good (1)

patco15 (213842) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551255)

For an example of how impressive this could be, check out this site [] . Look at the last picture on the page; dare I say classy?

Hacking a laptop's TFT Screen (4, Interesting)

pathwayX (453746) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550678)

This isn't 100% relevant to making a photo frame, but I also don't think it warrants an entire thread of its own. So here's a supplementary question from me: Has anyone successfully hacked a laptop's TFT screen for use with other devices?

Id est, have you successfully 'ripped' the screen from the laptop and interfaced it with stuff like an ordinary VGA, something that outputs video, pictures, whatever?

I'm trying to find more information on that. I have a couple of old laptops that can barely run X, and since I'm integrating a PC into my car, I thought it'd be nice to rip the TFT off of one and use it for in-car output. In the past, I've replaced some cabling connecting the laptop's on-board VGA card to the TFT screen and the entire system looked very weird to me. But I'm assuming it can be done, if the pinouts can be tracked down. Or I could be way off track :)

If anybody with more experience on this could point me to the right direction, I'd appreciate it.

Re:Hacking a laptop's TFT Screen (1)

dissy (172727) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551109)

Take a look at
for LCDs themselfs, and controllers to connect them to a PC.

Beware, its not the easist thing in the world to do however.

-- Jon

Re:Hacking a laptop's TFT Screen (3, Interesting)

MrResistor (120588) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551241)

You wouldn't be able to hook a TFT directly to a standard VGA port because it's not just a matter of a different pinout. Any LCD screen that hooks up to VGA has some sort of converter built in. There are other styles of port that should work, though. I'm think XGA and DVA, but it's been about a year since I've dealt with one of those, and even then it was only indirectly, so I could have my TLAs messed up.

Cheap LCD sources (4, Informative)

toral (267417) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550680)

eio [] has a few alternatives [] towards the bottom of the page (starting with the 5L-U4E). They range from $99 to $350 in with sizes 5", 6", and 12" available. Most of these accept an NTSC signal, so you could interface one with a cheap PC fairly easily. Unfortunately, all the color displays appear to be sold out right now. With a little bit of digging, you might be able to find another supplier of the same or similar products, or they might get more in stock sometime.

Also, Lik-sang [] has both a 5" [] and 7" [] LCD display for $99 and $199 respectively. The 5" is a PS One display that accepts NTSC/PAL, and the 7" is a more standard NTSC/PAL display. The latter has additional features like an screen orientation flip (so you can mount it however you like), speakers, and a battery slot. This would probably be my choice for this type of project.

Don't disregard the 3Com Audrey, however. You wouldn't even have to hack the thing to get it running as a picture frame. Just plug it into your network and use the browser to display the images from another server that is doing all the work. The browser has a full screen mode that is pretty well suited for this. I should know because one of mine was displaying a pr0n slideshow for a while :-). With a little bit of php/perl/asp/etc programming, you could make a very flexible (with respect to image size, delay between images, etc) solution that could behave exactly how you want.

Solutions (-1, Troll)

t_allardyce (48447) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550686)

Hire low cost labor (maybe from brazil?) and use them as a manual picture changer for pre-printed images.

Install screensaver. smash hole in wall, install monitor in hole.

Find someone that makes TFT wall-paper - you can light the room with it too, but just remember, don't use Windows(tm) to power it or you could be left in the dark HEHEHEHEHAHAHAHA :-D err... no :-(

LCD projection panel (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550703)

You might try looking on your favourite auction site for an LCD projection panel with PCMCIA support.

I got a Sharp QA-1500 for $140 a few weeks ago. This has 640x480 resolution, a removable backlight, and a 105Mb pcmcia drive which can be used to store jpegs.

You can set it up to cycle through the pictures, or use the remote. There are some limited image transition effects.

None of this requires a PC, in fact you can capture images direct from the screen itself to the hard drive. It has SVideo and composite inputs, as well as VGA, so you can even capture from a video camera if you want. It also has a speaker, though I don't think you can store sound on the hard drive.

It's not the most elegant thing to hang on your wall, but if you're looking to construct something yourself, it would make a good starting point.

Good Luck, and post some pictures if you get something going!

LCD sources? (1)

drfireman (101623) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550707)

Is there a good source out there for bare LCDs in small quantities? I've been able to find some at [] ,
but in general it doesn't seem like the kind of thing you can find at your local Radio Shack. Ten inch TFT displays there run around $300 minimum, so I don't see bringing the whole project in under $100 as practical, unless you're planning to go directly to the manufacturers and order thousands of units.

Re:LCD sources? (1) (535856) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551586)

I was able to pick up a crapload of LCD screens for 5 bucks a piece at a surplus store, mostly 12.1 and 14 inch displays.. The sheet that came from the manufacturer said they were bad, but I looked at the sheet and most said stuff like "one bad pixel" or "contrast not to standard" So I rummaged through them and bought all the ones I could. so I have 65 12.1 displays and about 5 14 inch displays, plus a handful of 10 inch ones sitting in my room!! I bought them with my rent check and now I need to know if they work. But to test them, I need a video card that costed more than the display.. So If anyone has anywhere they know of to get a cheap video card to test these things with, I would be willing to part with them..

it would be easier to buy one (1, Redundant)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550721) has great, moderately priced, subscription free frames of many sizes. I wrote the developer and he sent me his protocol specification [there's open for you]. also, i think they take either CF or smartmedia. and they look nice.

Audrey (2, Interesting)

Tolchz (19162) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550729)

1.) Buy Audrey
2.) Open browser on audrey and point it to cgi-script on a box on network
3.) Make Browser full screen
4.) Have cgi script display an image, wait a few seconds and reload.

Re:Audrey (1)

outofpaper (189404) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551261)

lose the cgi script and just use a meta refresh tag.

Get an Audrey... (2, Informative)

proxeus (526778) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550734)

3Com's Audrey is about $80 from and, from what I've heard, are easily hacked. You can even get a ethernet adapter so that you could even send the pictures through your network.

Re:Get an Audrey... not anymore - try here (1)

bluntmanspam (186509) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551431)

Tiger Direct doesn't have them anymore. Most recent source I have seen is [] for $99.

Important: I have never bought anything from this company and don't know anything about them other than they have a link from's message boards. Caveat emptor.

old Laptop LCD's (1)

CompuBOb (442376) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550737)

Would it be possible to hook up a Laptop LCD screen to a regular video card. I know you probably need some controller card or one of those 200 dollar ISA video cards that support it. anyways is there a easy and cheap way to do that. I have a few laptop lcd screens around here and I would like to get some use out of them. especially i I can use them with my GEFORCE 2.

OLED Display (1)

CompuBOb (442376) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550742)

hey remember when the OLED Display technology just came out and everyone was wanting to buy like 6 foor screens for dirt cheap. will that still happen when they come out sometime next year. will they still be dirt cheap?

Planar PC (1)

Bamfsog (535812) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550755)

Check around for some of the older Planar PC's. You used to be able to find the 486 with integrated LCD $100-$200, and they make a wallmount specifically for it.

They had an ISA slot and PCMCIA slot, so you could add an 802.11 adapter to stream data to it. They didn't have the greatest screen, but it might be ok. []

simple solution (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550802)

buy a cheap second video-adaptor and a video projector.

No power cables hanging from the wal + visible from all angles

dreamcast + linux + lcd (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550840)

Has anyone tried hooking up a Sega Dreamcast (running linux) to a surplus LCD screen?

You should be able to have the dreamcast run a script to cycle thru photos that are burned onto the system cdr after it boots.

And if you ever get tired of looking at the photos from the family trip to Wally World, you can pop in game. :-)

Cheap Ceiva (3, Informative)

lambda80 (213884) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550860)

Buy a Ceiva for $99 after rebate [] and hack it or not.

I-Opener, personal experience (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2550862)

GET AN I-OPENER. I ordered one after reading some slashdot about it, and it was about $140 + $80 for the hard drive, other mods. Right now their like $85 with HDD on e-bay. An i-opener is a full-fledged computer (internet device) minus HDD. Like, 32m ram, 233mhz, 12" screen, all in one. with a stand. but you could remove the stand and screw it into the wall if you want. Definitely the I-Opener is your best choice. I've got one, but it's not a frame yet. You might also try the Ricoh 1200S, or whatever, that's a 10.4" touchscreen (i got one of those too).
Good luck,

Similar Idea (2, Interesting)

Fisty (8619) | more than 12 years ago | (#2550885)

A couple of weeks ago, I had an idea similar to this. What I wanted was a device that had a 7" display that could act like a portable digital photo album.

My girlfriend likes to take pictures. She's not keen on getting a digital camera because she doesn't want to have to look at the pictures with a computer (let's put the printer conversation aside).

I figured that if she had a device that she could take with her, slide in a disc with the actual pictures on it, then she can browse the pictures away from her computer. So the theory is that she'd use her computer to compile albums on some form of disc (or something similar). These digital albums could then be taken and viewed using a portable device designed to input one of these discs, and display the photos on a 7" screen.

These digital frames are 1/2 way there.

Anyone know where I can get an Audrey now? (1)

helloRockview (205000) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551027)

Other than eBay, I'm having trouble finding the Audrey. TigerDirect doesn't seem to have it on their site anymore. Anyone have any suggestions?

ePods Internet Appliance (1)

Bastian227 (107667) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551160)

You may want to check out an ePods Internet Appliance [] . The company went out of business, and their product is highly hackable. Coincidence?

It is slow by today's computing standards but should serve as a digital picture frame just fine. You can put a 10Mb/s wireless card in it to pull the pictures off a network server or you can use a CompactFlash card. The CompactFlash card may be necessary because the ePods comes with little memory and runs at 256 colors by default. One of the hacks is to get it using 16-bit color, but it takes up most of the ePods' internal memory. New programs may need to be stored on the CompactFlash card.

Here's the catch: It runs Windows CE, and to hack it, you need another Windows box to transfer the hacked files to it. I took mine to work and hacked it there. I didn't want to attempt getting Linux ported to it.

It seems like there are a lot of downsides to using the ePods, and to overcome those downsides you have to spend some extra money beyond the cost of the ePods itself. I'm just trying to spread some info here. I'm going to give all this a shot, since I already have an ePods. :P

Sony Cyberframe (1)

Master Of Ninja (521917) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551162)

This is one of Sony's more "lifestyle concept" products (ie very expensive, although i thought it might be of interest.

The cyberframe [] (link to Salon as i couldn't find it on the sony site) is a digital picture frame which can display pictures from a memory stick. The purpose was that you could take a picture with your memory stick camera and stick the pictures into the frame immediately.

The downside is that is costs $900. A bit out of reach for practically everybody, but it apparently [] can do MPEGs and slide shows.

I just hope you can get a cheap laptop system (from the other comments) which you can hook up to a wall that actually looks as aesthetically pleasing as this, as there's no point in having a beautiful picture if there are wires streaking everywhere.

Been there, Done that (3, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2551166)

For a course at my college [] a few years ago, a group of us decided to build a digital picture frame. We wanted to build something similar to what you are describing. I hope my experience can help.

We built it from scratch -- no PC or handheld -- since we wanted it to be cheap, small, and portable. As the processor, we used a BasicX [] microcontroller. You program it in a language similar to BASIC -- very easy to pick up -- and it stores the code in EEPROM so that you can make changes at will. It also has a serial port (use a null-modem cable -- this is how you put the code on it) so you can use that for input/output when it is running independently to add/remove pictures, etc. The BasicX controller isn't the most stable thing in the world (nor the fastest) -- but it's great for quick + dirty development.

We used a cheap, nondescript, color 6" LCD, but had major problems trying to get it to sync correctly. The documentation was too scarce -- make sure you get lots of current docs on your LCD of choice. Perhaps the speed limitations of the BasicX controller had something to do with it (I think the minimum instruction execution time is around 1 us -- more for serial port accessing).

For storage, we tried to get a flash memory reader/writer, since the BasicX EEPROM was not sufficient. We wanted it to have lots of static memory that was also portable. (Perhaps not the greatest idea.) We couldn't find anything that was good for development purposes -- just end-user PC-compatible reader/writers. I recommend trying to find cheap, slow computer memory. This is possibly the most difficult part of the supplies -- finding static memory at a decent price.

Pricing was as follows:
BasicX Development Station: $140
Used, generic, unknown color LCD: $300
Flash memory reader/writer: $80
32MB Flash card: $50 (it was a few years ago)
Total: around $400

We also wanted to use a USB controller for reading/writing to memory -- bad idea. It cost us a lot of time and money.

Hope this helps,

Get an old Mac PowerBook... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2551183)

Run OS 7.5.3 [] , which they're giving away on [] -- and download GraphicConverter [] . Unscrew the display, put it in a frame, and be done with it.

how about taking this a step further... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#2551189)

and doing pictures unique for a certain profile? ie, you walk in the room with a smartcard device
that holds your ID and preferences. A sensor
takes this information and applies the pictures
and anything else that is hooked up in the room
to fit your profile.

bonus points for something that will detect your mood and apply the theme...

Things to consider (2)

hrieke (126185) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551221)

First, I'd want a high resolution to view the photos that I've scanned in. Some of these hit 1600x1280 quite easily. It need not be in pixels, but I'd want to have the density like IBM's high-end panels
Thin. I would want this to be no thicker than a regular picture in a frame.
Connections should either be wireless networking with batteries, or physical connections in the rear coming up though the wall.
Internal HD to store images. Some old IBM laptop.
Integration into a smart house network - so it is possible to change from 'Dogs Playing Poker' to 'Water Lilies' when a date shows up. Also support for standard video signals (TV) would be nice.

Humm... Too bad the bulbs in the LCD projectors don't last more than 200 hours, otherwise I'd suggest using one of those.

One approach (2)

gwernol (167574) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551496)

A couple of years ago, I upgraded my PowerBook, and had the old machine spare. It's a PowerBook 5300c - a decent CPU and TFT display, but rather low-end for development...

So I took it out of its case, placed the motherboard on the back of the LCD, bought a cheap ($10) picture frame with a custom-cut border and put them together.

At the time my house had Ethernet in the walls, so I punched a hole in the wall, and put the machine on my network. Power and net were hidden, and the machine worked great. I wrote a quick app that displayed images from my collection. A wonderful way to show digital photographs you've taken.

Total cost was about $30 - I had no other use for the 5300. You could pick up a cheap laptop on eBay for $100-$200 if you don't have a spare. Bear in mind that displaying JPEGs is a very low-end task. All you really need is a decent TFT display and a network connection. Local hard disc is nice but not required.

Great fun to do, too.

I still have this working in my new house, but it now has an Airport card so I only need to wire in the power supply. This makes it easier to move it around and means I don't have to run Ethernet everywhere.

LCD sources (1) (535856) | more than 12 years ago | (#2551614)

I was able to pick up a crapload of LCD screens for 5 bucks a piece at a surplus store, mostly 12.1 and 14 inch displays.. The sheet that came from the manufacturer said they were bad, but I looked at the sheet and most said stuff like "one bad pixel" or "contrast not to standard" So I rummaged through them and bought all the ones I could. so I have 65 12.1 displays and about 5 14 inch displays, plus a handful of 10 inch ones sitting in my room!! I bought them with my rent check and now I need to know if they work. But to test them, I need a video card that costed more than the display.. So If anyone has anywhere they know of to get a cheap video card to test these things with, I would be willing to part with them..
Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?