Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Highbrow Highjinks Come to an End

Hemos posted more than 12 years ago | from the scopes-comes-around dept.

Science 31

nickynicky9doors writes "The Sidney Morning Herald has an article debunking the long standing theory of our specie's dominance based on a proportionally greater development of the frontal lobe. MRI scanning suggest... 'proportionately, there is no major difference in the relative size of the frontal cortex among humans and their closest relatives.'"

cancel ×

31 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Phrenology (-1, Troll)

slubberdegullion (544119) | more than 12 years ago | (#3028241)

Prominent phrenologists all agree that negroids have a much more ape-like skull than Caucasoids, probably the cause of their ape-like behavior and intelligence

Re:Phrenology (1)

Noodlenose (537591) | more than 12 years ago | (#3028289)

This remark is not only based on crap science, but is also degrading, racist and one of the worst I have read on this server.

Dirk

Edison (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3028331)

Thomas Edison, Albert Einstein, and many other prominent(white, of course) scientists were not accepted at first. Petty, ignorant people such as yourself stand in the way of science. Phrenology has been scientifically proven. Slubberdegullion(anonymous to protect my karma from ignoramuses and negroids)

Re:Phrenology (-1)

ringbarer (545020) | more than 12 years ago | (#3029139)

Scientific studies have also shown that the difference in skull shapes means that the negroid sub-races have underdeveloped areas of the brain related to morality and social responsibility, essentially making them unable to function in civilised society.

Hence poverty, ghettoization, drug abuse, and of course, violent crime.

Clearly these subhuman creatures should be released back into the jungle, where they should, given an inability to fend for themselves without welfare checks, die out.

Re:Phrenology is old BS (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3049633)

I don't know if negroids should be "released in the jungle" as someone proposed.

What I know is that, every day, every hour, every minute life gets more difficult for you all who separate human beings into classes.

This is because we, the majority, don't tolerate this point of view.

Think you have the right to say that others are inferior to you? I advise you to think otherwise. Start now as it may take time to change your mind.

Have a nice day!

Re:Phrenology (-1, Troll)

Dr. Carl Jung (559378) | more than 12 years ago | (#3028600)

I concur. Niggers are apes.

Re:Phrenology and Honkies (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3029170)

YO YO YO BIZNATCH! I IZ GONNA HAV TA ROLL UP IN DIS PEICE WIT MAH HOMIES AN BUS' A CAP IN YO WHITE ASS! W3RD!!1 YO LILLY WHITE AZZ CHEEKZ IS GONNA HAVE DIS NICKA'S SIZE 12 KICKS UP INIT!! I'MA RAPE YO MOMMA ADN SHOOT YO DOG, HONKEY!

Re:Phrenology sucks (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3049651)

So are whites... what's the big deal?

I don't get it... You are a primate, my friend, get used to this idea! Negros are apes, yellows, too and whites are no different.

Instead of fighting this, learn how make it an advantage. You'll do better in life and look more intelligent, too. ;-)

hooray (1)

Noodlenose (537591) | more than 12 years ago | (#3028275)

Great Stuff.

So, does that mean our limbic system is similar to our animal friends?

No wonder...

Dirk

Quality, Not Quantity (3, Interesting)

cybrpnk (94636) | more than 12 years ago | (#3028278)

The key to consciousness is in the ORGANIZATION of the neurons in the "proportionally sized" area of interest. When they show us micrographs that indicate the wiring is identical between men and other apes, then maybe I'll change my mind, but not before. You have some people (hulking linebackers) with big heads and brains (literally) and others (petite cheerleaders) with small heads and brains - but they both are equally intelligent humans (sort of...)

Re:Quality, Not Quantity (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3029079)

man, now i wanna see someone with a petite cheerleader head and a hulking linebacker brain.

Re:Quality, Not Quantity (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3049324)

Oh, but you can see!

Not sure, but I guess you have to go to someone who is a coroner (strange name, I mean those doctors who do autopsies).

Re:Quality, Not Quantity (1)

TheBoquaz (530526) | more than 12 years ago | (#3036742)

Think of it this way:

Having a larger brain means more stuff to make connections out of, that doesn't necessarily mean we have to make those connections.

does someone remember this? (2)

Bossofall (559501) | more than 12 years ago | (#3028284)

I would like to bring something else to everyones attention that seems relevant; a study done in England. During the 1960s doctors gave shunts to some patients with "water on the brain." These poor people didn't have much hope for a quality life as others do. When researchers went back to see how these children were doing in the 1980s, they found, astonishingly, that they had IQ's of around 120 and were all able to finish university. After further investigation it was found that only a very small portion of their brains were functioning (a small bit in the cerebellum I believe). I am sorry to say I don't remember who did this study, but I hope someone who reads this will and post more details. I am sure I have gotten some details wrong, so please don't flame me. I just remember this as very interesting since it seemed to be a radicaly change from the way we see the brain.

Spina Bifida / Hydrocephalus Info (4, Insightful)

cybrpnk (94636) | more than 12 years ago | (#3028478)

Here's more than you ever want to know about spina bifida / hydrocephalus [dinf.org] and how it generally affects [geocities.com] those who have it - one of whom talks about it here [syr.edu] . One study on IQ follow-up is here [unimaas.nl] but it only says the expected problems result. My wife is a labor / delivery nurse and sees this pretty frequently, it's not pretty and just about always causes neurological damage....

Hmm, what a coincidence... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3049352)

I don't know if "water in the brain" is Hydrocephaly -- Hydro==water ; cephalein(?sp)==head.

I recall, if it's the case, that Egyptian pharaohs had this.

Language (3, Interesting)

crow (16139) | more than 12 years ago | (#3028332)

I've heard it suggested that what makes us different is the use of language. I think the theory goes that our species existed for a long time with little sign of intelligence. Then language was developed, and everything changed almost overnight. Key factors include not just the brain capacity for language, but the vocal capacity for language. Or so goes the theory.

I've heard of them teaching other primates to use sign language, and the results are fascinating.

So perhaps we aren't that much smarter than other primates, and hence, people studying brain mechanisms won't find the differences they're looking for.

Re:Language (2, Funny)

Nf1nk (443791) | more than 12 years ago | (#3029103)

I forget his name, but there was a 19th century french philospher who said that the apes remained mute to avoid being put to work.

does this show that he was right?

Re:Language (1)

codeButcher (223668) | more than 12 years ago | (#3030802)

So maybe they are more intelligent than us?

Re:Language (3, Informative)

wrt2 (150916) | more than 12 years ago | (#3029109)

Actually, the experiments with teaching sign language to chimpanzees and gorillas demonstrated that human language acqusition and use are different from other primates. People are specialized to learn language; a child will learn spoken language barring severe neurological damage or neglect. (Interestingly, deaf babies have been observed babble-signing with their hands.) Further, children not only acquire pronunciation and vocabulary, but are able to fit them into syntactical grammatical frameworks of arbitrary complexity. Chimpanzees can sign "give drink fruit," but cannot tell a story. "Smarter," though, is a different issue. Chimpanzees and bonobos are brilliant at being chimpanzees and bonobos. Assuming that we don't end life on our planet, we might just be brilliant at being us.

Re:Language (1)

HighTeckRedNeck (538597) | more than 12 years ago | (#3032349)

If you will compare the Bible and the Quran for their information on the Genesis of Humanity you will find that proto-man existed prior to man taking up the Trust of Stewardship. At that point proto-man was *evolved* to know the difference between good and evil, a side effect of eating of the fruit(badly translated as apple) of knowledge was the loss of bliss (ignorance is bliss). A second side effect was that woman would give birth in pain (due to the enlarged head at birth). There are three differences then between present man and proto-man. 1) increased early development of the brain, 2) directed development of society and probably most important 3) "Praise be to God who has taught man what he knew not, Taught man by the pen." (I may have quoted the Quran incorrectly there but you can find it.)

All animals have language(we are just to stupid to accept that it may be nonverbal, read the book the horse whisperer), though not so developed, many animals use tools (most grow them themselves, long tongues, claws ...) but few have directed development and the pen. The pen allows our knowledge to be passed on in time and space. Civilization as we know it would have been greatly limited without the pen. Any given person would be little more than an animal without the benefits from them. Religious development and the pen are necessary conditions for the development of society past a certain point.

Most people misunderstand the stories. The atomic(indivisible matter) theory came from Democratus but his teachings on the four phases of matter got dummied down to earth(solid), water(liquid), air(gas) and fire(plasma) (most common examples). You can only imagine what happened to the teachings of (indivisible man) "adam" when it got dummied down to the concepts available then. Note the similarity to "atom" and "adam" in spelling. When man gets divided from God he becomes animal. Religion (re- again, ligio- to bind) is about making man whole again by binding himself back to God (willfully). Like an atom, a human is not stable until its parts (spin, charge ...) are balanced and functioning as willed by God. And society will be just as unstable when unbalanced and not functioning as willed by God.

That's the difference between fully developed humans and animals. We are (at our best) wisdom(light e=mc^2) made clay (a mix of solid, liquid, gas and ions) and the pen allows us to do the same, metaphorically speaking.

So many inaccuracies.... (1)

Macrobat (318224) | more than 12 years ago | (#3035997)

Where do I begin?

First, the size of a baby's head has little to do with how uncomfortable labor is--other parts of the body do that just fine. The skull, in fact, is not fully fused, so a baby's head is noticeably distorted for 24-48 hours after going through what I like to call the "Play-doh fun factory of life." You can spot Caesarean babies precisely because their heads are bulbous and not funny mush-shapes. Also, many other animals (especially mammals) evince what appears to be extreme discomfort during labor; it's not limited to humans.

Second, many societies are advanced, in the sense that they form stable social units with laws and traditions, without the aid of writing. True, technological society as we know it wouldn't exist, but to say that people are "little more than animals" without the benefits of writing is ignorant and absurd.

Third, "atom" and "adam" come from different languages. Atomos means "small" in Greek; adam means "person" in Hebrew. The similarity in English transliteration means nothing. It certainly doesn't mean that we have a "spin" and a "charge" in any meaningful, macro-level sense, that has to be aligned or balanced as willed by anyone.

Finally, you shouldn't call just any means of communication "language." Even chimps who have been taught sign language lack the ability to put together elaborate sentences, and just because horses respond well to soothing whispers doesn't mean their comprehension of "language" meets even the bottom rung of sophistication for human speech.

I don't quite know if you're trying to sway people to your religious beliefs with this post, but if you are, you need to present them with a little more clarity of mind.

Re:So many inaccuracies.... No. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3049571)

About the original posting: "Si non è vero, è benne trovato!" (If not true, it is well discovered")

I've been hearing for many years that women have not evolved well to match our skull increase in size. Is this wrong?

Regarding the pen, I sure wouldn't not phrase things like the poster did -- no denying that written things are our long-term common memory, though. Think about what happened when Alexandria's library was burnt.

We can have advanced cultures without writing, but again this is also not just about technology. I think the original poster exaggerated in his words, but writing really makes a world of difference.

Next, don't know about "adam" (hebraic is out of reach for me), but didn't it mean "first"?
"Atom", though, is not small. "A" means not, "tomos" means "divisible", or "divided". So "atom" is indivisible (?sp). Of the same origin is "tome", a division or part of an encyclopedia, for instance.

Of course, the words have different origins. If HighTeckRedNeck implied same roots, well, you're right, that's first-order BS. But maybe he was just using some kind of figurative language, so as to convey an argument. In this case, I would only find this use kind of pitoresque, funny, not wrong.

I disagree with your last point: IMO we can call any means of communication language. But the point is not this. We're looking for intelligence. Bees, for instance, are dumb but have a very sophisticated language, it seems.

On higher animals, however, I've read things that often amaze me. Don't take my word on this, do some search on, e.g., Google and see what you find.

But, of course, we are light-years ahead of them.

Now, you may not know, but I'm a Christian. Catholic to be more precise, not a Muslim, but the guy won't get me converted, because, for starters, I'm a very lousy at being Catholic.

But I like to see one expose such beautiful views about his religion. In fact, I would like a Buddhist, Brahmanist or whatever talk in that way. And even atheists can say good things, too.

Let's be scientific, ok, but also let's appreciate the different views of this world, which we must share, shall we?

Let us proactively seek mutual understanding.

Oh for Cliff's Sake! (1)

merkac (553485) | more than 12 years ago | (#3028472)

Firstly it's spelt "Sydney". The Olympics were only held there. We thought you might have noticed.

Secondly, the so-called 'dominance' of our species is really self-evident in the way it's just our species that rapes the planet.

Dominance shouldn't be about the size of anything. It's what you do with it that counts. E.g. Look at what the dolphins are doing with their brains. Nothing much really. Just living and getting by.

Who's the more intelligent?

merkac - (side references to Doug Adams)

Re:Oh for Cliff's Sake! (3, Insightful)

Detritus (11846) | more than 12 years ago | (#3030303)

Secondly, the so-called 'dominance' of our species is really self-evident in the way it's just our species that rapes the planet.

Elephants and goats can do a great job of destroying an ecosystem.

Sidney ? (2, Funny)

ChrisGuest (556510) | more than 12 years ago | (#3029160)

what kind of cortex development, caused this typo.

Re:Sidney ? (1)

nickynicky9doors (550370) | more than 12 years ago | (#3067964)

For the record: First I apologise for the typo; by way of apology I lived in Sidney, Vancouver Island, B.C. Canada for a few years so the spelling mistake is not without some associational excuse.

"...what kind of cortex development, caused this typo."
Geographical I guess.

Sidney? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3029348)

Man, that's vicious of you

Is this for real? (2, Informative)

ramb (256851) | more than 12 years ago | (#3032154)

I was just trying to find this paper in Nature Neuroscience (as referenced in the article) and all that's returned is...

No documents matched the query.
Search query:Author: Semendeferi
Your search yielded no results. You may refine this query or perform a new query

It's not in Nature either. The newest paper I can find is: Am J Phys Anthropol 2001 Mar;114(3):224-41 which is only area 10 and is hardly new enough to be "news for nerds". Anybody have the correct cite?

we know nothing ... yet (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3098770)

What this all shows us is that though we arrogantly think we know everything there is to know about the origin of our species ... like many other sciences, we're just BEGINNING realizing how ignorant we are.

Hopefully, with better technology, we'll be able to test of these theories (those that even qualify as such), and finally know what is actual science, and what is mere faith.

BTW, this includes both sides of the origins argument.

Re:we know nothing ... yet (2)

beanerspace (443710) | more than 12 years ago | (#3099316)

You may have a point there. I just read an interesting article entitled "Earth formed quicker than thought [ananova.com] ."

While findings could be used by "either side of the origins debate", as you so interestingly put it, it does support your claim that we're merely at the end of the beginning of scientific discovery.

A prospect that both thrills me and frightens me all at once.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>