Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Census Bureau Wants 500,000 Handhelds in 2010

michael posted more than 12 years ago | from the unnatural-acts dept.

Handhelds 124

andori writes: "ComputerWorld is reporting that the Census Bureau is wanting to conduct the 2010 Census without the use of paper. They want to use 500,000 handhelds with GPS and wireless communications abilities. And they want to do it for $100 an unit. I sure hope the industry is able to that price point some day! I will personally take a few if they do."

cancel ×

124 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

fp! (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172334)

fp motherfuckers...you all can suck it

The gift that keep son giving... (1)

Barkmull (540420) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172335)

cool...I think!

The Technology is the now just not the price (1)

Black0ut (32902) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172336)

We already have handhelds that can do that and by 2009ish when they will want to buy them I dont see this being an issue. We already have several handhelds for around $100 on the market.

Re:The Technology is the now just not the price (2)

Bryan Andersen (16514) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172386)

Yep. All the functions they want are available now in one form or another in handhelds. In 6 years they should have them at much reduced cost. I can even see less than $100 in 500k quantities. As I see the way chips are going now. It would fit on two chips plus some support. The main CPU, memory, display and IO control will all fit on one chip by then. The GPS and cell phone part will be another chip. They may even get them merged by then, but I fell the analog side of the cell phone and GPS will likely make it so they still use two chips. The support circutry will be stuff like power supply and IO protection devices, that's it. It will likely be the size of a standard V series palm pilot or maybe even thinner. By then the back of the case will able to be the battery. Got to love the Li-Polymer batteries. Something like that might even get me to carry a cell phone.

As a side note, they really need to ahve them by mid 2008ish. That's only 6 years off.

Re:The Technology is the now just not the price (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172715)

Modern cellphones are more advanced than the vast majority of handhelds sold nowadays. They are often cheaper because by buying one you are also signing for some services.
Yes, we have the technology to put in the market $50 handhelds too, but big companies want to squeeze the lemon slowly.

First post (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172337)

First post

Re:First post (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172350)

sorry champ, beat ya to it

that would be sweet! (1)

abolith (204863) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172338)

I know from firsthand exp. that would make things MUCH more simple. however it wouldn't work in alot of areas, such as mountian communities where thetre is wireless service, hell you're lucky to dialup in the mountians! but in the larger areas (where the bulk of the population is) it would make things go alot faster.

Re:that would be sweet! (3, Insightful)

mr_gerbik (122036) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172353)

"however it wouldn't work in alot of areas, such as mountian communities where thetre is wireless service"

1) we are talking 2010 here.. in 7 1/2 years a lot of things can change 2) gps uses satellites.. you don't need a cellular tower.

Re:that would be sweet! (1)

Arimus (198136) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172382)

3) GPS is one-way.... the GPS will just fix their position - the wireless link is still needed to get the data from the device back to the servers...

To be honest at the rate of change in the last year with the handheld market it will be interesting to see what they come up with.

Re:that would be sweet! (1)

jx100 (453615) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172470)

Well, if the device has enougth storage space, they could just get the data back by plugging it into its base and having it upload data to the servers from there.

Uhh.. (4, Insightful)

Wakko Warner (324) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172341)

They want to use 500,000 handhelds with GPS and wireless communications abilities. And they want to do it for $100 an unit.

Can't the Blackberry almost do this already? In 7 years, we'll have nothing to worry about. You vastly underestimate the pace at which technological innovation moves on this planet.

- A.P.

Re:Uhh.. (-1)

beee (98582) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172387)

no U r underestim8ing

Re:Uhh.. (3, Insightful)

KFury (19522) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172394)

Err, Blackberry can do wireless, but not GPS. A Garmin eTrek can do GPS for under $100, but not wireless.

How necessary is wireless to the equation, really? What's wrong with storing the info on the unit until it gets to a base station at the end of the day? I mean, will wireless get the final census data out a day earlier?

Of course, from a usability standpoint, where accuracy is absolutely vital, I don't think a chicklet keyboard like the blackberry or hiptop will cut it, and handwriting recognition probably won't either, so it'd probably be a pen-based systen with custom software. Add 24 months of development and 6 months of field testing, not to mention the specification and bidding process, and they'll have to be using technology that comes out in the next couple years...

"You vastly underestimate the pace at which technological innovation moves on this planet."

Perhaps, but you vastly overestimate the pace at which bureaucratic advancement moves on this planet.

Re:Uhh.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3173224)

"How necessary is wireless to the equation, really? What's wrong with storing the info on the unit until it gets to a base station at the end of the day? I mean, will wireless get the final census data out a day earlier?"

Yes probably more than a day. Hell just reducing paper to that of a backup will make it faster. Wireless means getting the max amount of people doing the cencus rather than uploading it to a comp.

Re:Uhh.. (2)

Kanasta (70274) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172491)

Look at the history of tech. Things get cheaper... to a point. Then they just add features instead of lowering price.

Re:Uhh.. (2)

edunbar93 (141167) | more than 12 years ago | (#3173856)

Sure, and at that point you can pick up some good used stuff for $100.

Training and implementation. (1)

jhines (82154) | more than 12 years ago | (#3173198)

Training and implementation and testing takes time. Pencil and paper are easy. Many of these units will need to be delivered 1-2 years in advance.

So they are right to get started on this now.

Not to mention building the back end network.

Re:Uhh.. (2)

Wolfier (94144) | more than 12 years ago | (#3173793)

Yeah, why would GPS be even necessary?

When the people who carry out a census need a GPS to locate themselves, I'll for sure doubt about their ability to do their jobs.

Hold on a second (0, Troll)

Ctrl-Z (28806) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172342)

Wait, let me get this straight. They want to conduct a census without the use of paper, yet they want to do it door-to-door. That doesn't make any sense at all. What's the problem with paper? It's sure a hell of a lot more reliable than electronics. And don't tell me that it's faster, because you know that's just FUD.

Maybe Microsoft will run the 2010 census too. They always have such innovative ideas.

Re:Hold on a second (1)

recursiv (324497) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172488)

Don't tell you it's faster? That's FUD??

Wait... what if it actually is faster? Can't be FUD then.

Screw Microsoft (0, Flamebait)

sillygoat2 (446431) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172501)

Haha. Right on Man. If we all cross our fingers, maybe we could convince micro$hi to bless us with such an innovative solution.

must be a troll...why am I wasteing a response... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172512)

Don't be a chump....if the census takers use PDA's that accept handwriting on the screen, how can this be a bad thing? Paper is faster? How? How can it be faster to delay gathering the data electronically?

How do you get all those individual pieces of paper turned into something that can be counted and checked and compiled...is that faster than having the data already in electronic form?

If you bypass the manual entry/gather method and go direct to data input, you do something we've all been doing for years...enjoying automated data entry.

Ever been to a restuarant where they take your order on a wireless handheld? Your food order is being displayed and acted on in the kitchen as soon as the waiter hits send.

Try using an ATM by filling out a form first. Or consider a PDA instead of all those forms you fill out for a car loan...or passport....or tax forms...chump-troll.

Shouldn't be a problem (4, Insightful)

PaxTech (103481) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172343)

Right now, the functionality is just about there and the price isn't that far off either. Given another 6-7 years of tech, I have to say I'll be pretty disappointed if something like that costs anywhere near $100.

Re:Shouldn't be a problem (1)

sulli (195030) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172448)

Unless it has been banned by the SSSCA or subsequent legislation.

Re:Shouldn't be a problem (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172472)

The SSSCA is _not_ the big deal everyone makes it out to be.

Re:Shouldn't be a problem (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172577)

you must work for the mpaa

be gone foul creature!!

Re:Shouldn't be a problem (1)

TiggerStripe (556105) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172462)

The way things are going, I'll be very disappointed if the tech isn't built in to the very people assigned to the beat 7 years down the road. mod me down! off topic, whatever. my troll is off, so an OT will hafta do. thank you.

Re:Shouldn't be a problem (1)

bartok (111886) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172490)

Handhelds have been out for a couple of years and have made significant progress technologicaly but the prices of the low-end devices are still expensive. The manufacturers prefer to phase out old models than to have theirs high end handhelds compete with a low end model of yesterday's technology that could be sold for 50$.

Okay. (2)

AnalogBoy (51094) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172346)

By 2010, I don't see this as a problem. Hell, the local power company is already doing this.. not for that cheap, and they're not exactly palms.. but we have 8 years to go.

I don't see why this will be a problem.

Most of the way there, perhaps (2, Insightful)

StarOwl (131464) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172348)

Sprint PCS [sprintpcs.com] is selling the Kyocera 6035 [kyocera-wireless.com] for $150. The 6035 is an combination Palm and CDMA phone.

I don't think it's too unreasonable that a combination GPS, PDA, and phone could be made available at $100/pop within the next 6 years.

Re:Most of the way there, perhaps (2)

Chairboy (88841) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172414)

Er, the price is actually closer to $500. Sprint eats about $300 off the sticker to get you to sign up w/ a contract.

Honestly, you don't think those 5190s and stuff are actually FREE, do you?

simple economics says it can be done right now (3, Insightful)

ubiquitin (28396) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172363)

As the volume goes up, the price goes down. If retail stores take their typical 30+% markup on a $120 Palm device, then the Palm device makers are already in the range. I'm sure any one of the major handheld players would love to get that contract $50 million for 500,000 handhelds leaves LOTS of margin when those 500,000 handhelds are being churned out of fabs in Korea and Hong Kong.

Re:simple economics says it can be done right now (1)

coldshado (251610) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172456)

most retail stores only make about 2-15% on various handhelds/cell phones/computers/etc. their profits lie in accessories (batteries, hands-free, etc)

Re:simple economics says it can be done right now (2)

YouAreFatMan (470882) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172812)

Are you confusing profits with markup? Markup is the amount the store adds to the wholesale cost. Profits is how much the store makes after all the costs are paid for. Typical retail markups often are 30-50% of the retail price. Profits, on the other hand, are often in the 5% range.

Re:simple economics says it can be done right now (0, Offtopic)

TiggerStripe (556105) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172466)

y'know, that's a real price break from those $1000 wrenches the US air force was buying some years back.. (prob. still are, those cheaply bought air force pussies) hello, can we get an OT over here please? thank you! BTW i think that moderators are doing a wonderful job here on slashdot, don't you? :D

entirely without paper? (1)

autopr0n (534291) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172365)

Isn't the whole point of the census to get a complete count of everyone? That means, everyone needs to fill out a form... Do they expect people to do it over the web or something?

Re:entirely without paper? (1)

SystemAddict (552141) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172798)

A couple of weeks ago it was reported that the UK government was considering abandoning censuses. They reckon that most of the information it gathers can already be got from tax, social security and other records and that the cost of the census isn't justified by the results.

There's also a recognition that the UK population isn't as docile as it used to be and there's a suspicion that the number of people refusing to complete it is going up every ten years - the Poll Tax put off some folks back in 1991, in 2001 they didn't realise that other people would object to there not being an "English" box to tick when they asked us our ethnic origin for the first time.

Re:entirely without paper? (1)

3waygeek (58990) | more than 12 years ago | (#3173140)

Intresting idea, but the US Census is mandated by the Constitution, so we just can't do away with it.

Of course, with the current occupants of the White House & Supreme Court, little things like the Constitution don't matter too much...

Re:entirely without paper? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3173288)

So they could ammend it.

Re:entirely without paper? (1)

Max Coffee (559629) | more than 12 years ago | (#3173084)

Not everyone fills out the forms, and some people don't receive them (some new houses, for example, or "off the record" divisions of houses into apartments, etc. aren't on the address database). So the Census Department follows up the form campaign with a door-to-door campaign to try to fill in the holes.

Census bueau wants 0 copies of linux by 2010 (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172367)

You heard! Uninstall Linux now, it only $179 a fresh shiny copy of windows XP! Please the census, uninstall linux!

Re:Census bueau wants 0 copies of linux by 2010 (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172700)

I took your advice, went down to the local shop and picked up a copy of WinXP, un-installed linux, installed WinXP.

The whole process took around 2 hours.

Wow! My computer is so much easer to use now, and it performs so much better as well!

Thank you for your advice

Heck.. (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172368)

If they give me one of those computers, I'll actually take part in the census this time..

Re:Heck.. (1)

Bryan Andersen (16514) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172424)

40,000,000 million households, 500,000 units. I guess you get 1/80th of a unit. ;)

On the other hand at $100 each, that's peanuts to buy. My guess is the unit will actually be made in million pluss quantities as it would also be quite usefull as a standard PDA/Cell Phone/GPS. I'd buy one, especially if it had a large non-volitile memory for programs and data.

Re:Heck.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3173800)

> 40,000,000 million households

40 TRILLION households???

Just waiting to be hacked... (5, Funny)

Yoda2 (522522) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172374)

Hopefully this goes without saying, but they better have a very good security model.

Otherwise we might see small rural areas with amazing population booms, their own congressional districts, and lots of federal $$$.

Hopefully (2, Interesting)

red5 (51324) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172376)

Hopefully they don't save the data in a proprietary format. Thus rendring the data useless by 2015. Like say domesday [slashdot.org] . :)

Re:Hopefully (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3173911)

You assume they are going to keep the data on the handheld data collection unit. You should be really concerned with how the datacenter stores it.

Why not? (2)

truesaer (135079) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172378)

Palm was selling Palm VII's for a hundred bucks for a while with large rebates. You would then need GPS units though. Still, with an order of 500k units they should be able to get a pretty deep discount so I think that $100 should be reasonable. Also, remember the next census is many years off, so prices should be lower in general (Hopefully!!).

Re:Why not a Big Mac? (1)

TiggerStripe (556105) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172471)

in 7 years they can buy MY palm VIII (heck, make it Palm XII !) for eighty-- make it an even hundred. i'll bet my coworkers will take em up on that one too, even toss in a used GPS mod or two for that price. Or possible trade for a Big Mac. Either or.

Page widening census! (-1)

Klerck (213193) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172379)

.I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you

Re:Page widening census! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172697)

keep up the good work klerck.

For one reason... (3, Funny)

HappyCycling (565803) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172385)

The census people want Bejeweled, and they want it soon.

Re:For one reason... (1)

UnifiedTechs (100743) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172536)

Bejeweled got you hooked too????
They need a warning label on that game!!!!

yet another (2)

drDugan (219551) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172388)



yet another completely absurd dependence on a machine in a system that works fine without them.

but hey -- its more profits for some company! and we all know thats good for everyone.

--

Re:yet another (2)

digitalunity (19107) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172411)

Not exactly. Although I can't figure out why they need 500,000 to count the heads of 325 million people. Each one is good for only 625 heads? Maybe they will be sparsley used in rural towns, but I could see a single bean counter hitting the houses of 2000+ people in a weeks time in a metropolitan setting. I think 500,000 is a little overboard.

And what about this: Where do all 500,000 go when they are done with the census? Do they keep them for the next census, or flood the market with 2 week old handhelds?

Good questions...

Re:yet another (2)

tunah (530328) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172452)

Although I can't figure out why they need 500,000 to count the heads of 325 million people.

I can't figure out why they would need any.

Here we have 325m people. Count them. Your budget is $50m.

(Yes I know censuses (censi?) aren't just for counting...)

Re:yet another (2)

Dreamweaver (36364) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172556)

Why would they need any? Well, let's see...

You start with 325 million people.

Let's say for the sake of argument that all of those people are members of an a household of 3. That's 108,333,333 households, round off to 108m.

That's 108 million census forms that have to be sent out. If the form is sent with a return envelope, that's 3 paper articles each form, which effectively brings us back up to 325 million again. As I recall, I got two forms in the mail last time because I didn't send in the first one fast enough. Let's say that half of America turns in their form on the first go. That's an amazingly generous estimate, but we'll go with it.

That's 438 million sheets of paper used up so far.

Now we have the actual head-counters.

Let's say that half of the people served a second census form turn it in, leaving us with just 1/4th of the population to count. That's 81m census forms. They leave you a new one every time they come by if you're not home, and I think I got 3 before they finally caught up with me. Let's say they get half the first time. Forty million are left a second, and if half of them are home, 20 million get the third. That's a total of 141 million more sheets of paper, added to our 438 of before.

So a total of 579 million pieces of paper are used up in this venture so far. We won't bother counting the shipping materials for all those head counters to send in their finished forms.

Now we have 108 million households worth of census info. What do we do with it? Why, stick it in a computer, of course! What good is census data if the government can't poll the database for statistics? If we employ 100 data entry operators working 8 hour shifts every day and entering an average of 1 household each every 30 seconds, it'll take us a mere 35 days to enter them all.

OR

We send out 325 million sheets of paper, then send out the head counters with their palmtops. You need 500,000 because half will end up broken during use. Just like you'd likely lose another 50 million sheets of paper due to carelessness on the parts of mail personnell and head counters.

All the data collected is already on computer, so you don't need 2800 man-hours of work to key it all and there's no chance of error in the transfer from hard-copy to digital because the head of household is standing right there when you enter it.

And, best of all, those palmtops are good for more than one use. All that paper costs money to recycle, if it even gets recycled. The PDAs that don't end up broken during use are good for the next census. Sure, they'll be a few years out of date from industry-standard, but if they're good enough for the job now, they're good enough then. So even if you Do lose half to damage, that's $25 million less you're spending on the next census, on top of money saved from printing, shipping, and data entry expenses.

So yes, using electronic census forms is a complete and total waste of time and money. Why on earth would we ever want to do it when paper is so clearly more efficient? God knows computers are worthless. Aren't you glad we had the foresight to nip that internet thing in the bud and keep on getting Slashdot by carrier pigeon? It worked from great-grampa, it'll bloody well work for me, too.

Re:yet another (1)

Skater (41976) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172846)

The flaw in your logic is that plenty of people don't want to be counted or just can't be bothered to return the forms, etc.

That means the Census Bureau has to send out people to knock on doors, set up appointments, and generally try to track down the people that didn't return the forms.

Then, they also have to count homeless people and such. That's not an easy task, either.

$50m isn't enough to count the people, at least not with any reasonable assurance of quality.

--RJ

and what do they do with it? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3173855)

Those profits go towards hiring people. Maybe even people like you.

But what really matters! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172389)

STOP WASTING SO MUCH ENERGY!
You people use about twice as much energy per person than most people in the developed world, so stop it!

USA = 7300kg oil equiv
Europe = 4000kg oil equiv

Bite me, moron. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172453)

Know why we use so much energy? BECAUSE WE CAN. That's right, here in the Good Ol' US of Fuckin'-A, we can leave our lights on 24 hours a day, turn up the air conditioner on days when it's only 75F (that's 10C for you Eurotrash)...and we'll leave our windows open so we can spew that CFC-laden air right into the atmosphere!

While I'm doing that, I think I'll have a big hearty lunch of baby harp seal fillet, some spotted owl eggs, and I'll wash it down with a nice tall glass of crude oil. Hell, I'll drink a barrel -- I don't think I've quite met my quota for the year-to-date. Lemme check...I should be at 1500 Kg already, and I've barely got 1200! Better make that two barrels.

And then, after lunch, I'm gonna turn on my 72" television, and my THX/Dolby Digital/Deafening Bass sound system, and I'm going to watch footage of the ass-kicking we're giving the apes in Afghanistan. I'll clean my guns (all 47 of them) while I snuggle my tootsies into the thick, warm, bearskin rug in my living room -- it's made from a bear I took down myself. I should probably put on a sweater (which was made in China...what the hell do I care if they use eight-year-old prisoners for slave labor there, as long as it's cheap), since my house is so damned cold right now. And I'll laugh aloud with joy at my own existence, and how much it irritates the crap out of you.

Think about that while you huddle in your miserable, damp little excuse for a shithole apartment, in a complex with two thousand other people that has all the aesthetic sense of a cinder block, eating swill and praying not to offend your precious Gaia.

Census? (-1)

October_30th (531777) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172393)

conduct the 2010 Census without the use of paper

Huh?

You mean like it's 2002 and a technologically advanced nation like the USA does not have a computerized realtime database on her citizens? Surely there must be a database on the newborn, dead, immigrated/emigrated people and people who pay taxes?

Conducting the Census (which I guess is not even a real Census but statistical) by interviewing only a sample of people sounds like a total waste of taxpayers money to me. Even if it is made a paperless process.

I want an embedded Linux PDA (1)

Eric Damron (553630) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172398)

Sharp has a sweet looking PDA with embedded Linux but WOW, pricey! Between $500.00 and $600.00.

I'm talking about the Zaurus SL-5500 SL-5500. But at that price I doubt that the census people will be packing them around. If you want to take a look at one you'll find it here [linuxdevices.com] .

It's amazing how much technology has changed. I wonder if they'll have a "Get the hell off my property and leave me alone!" checkbox.

Re:I want an embedded Linux PDA (1)

smoyer (108342) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172847)

I have a development unit of the Sharp Zaurus ... and it is sweeeeeeet.

The user software is still being fine tuned (for consistancy and "missing" functionality, but when the consumer version is released ... watch out.

Go over to ZaurusZone [zauruszone.com] to check out what the open source community is doing (the entire shabang).

Sorry I can't give you links to the developer sites, but I will say that the Trolltech contest alone will result in 1000s of available (and many free) applications.

My what big storage you have... (0)

SnakeStu (60546) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172400)

"All the better to violate your privacy with."

Some have asked why this should be done without paper. One answer that springs to mind is that paper doesn't hold enough data about the populace. If it's done with a techie gadget with lots of functionality and (more importantly) storage, the government can intrude even further into our lives.

Heck, make it into a game and have people answer the questions while entertaining themselves, and they'll have no qualms about providing their most intimate details. "Hmm, do I conceal the fact that I snitched money from the church offering plate or do I kill the big boss for this level? Uh... Maximum points!"

Sorry, feeling just a wee bit cynical this evening...

Disposable units? (2)

KFury (19522) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172402)

What would these half-million units be used for after the 2010 census? One thing is certain: The wireless protocols they end up using won't exist in 2020. Maybe they should donate them to schools?

Re:Disposable cow sticks? (1)

TiggerStripe (556105) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172478)

I propose that the used units are recycled into cattle feed, the way everything else is these days. Cheapest antibiotics around comes in your Quarter Pounder with Cheese :O) so why not your daily silicon and plastic too? failing that, maybe another CueCat will emerge from the wreckage, and we'll have more better toys again! Wheeeeee!

Re:Disposable units? (2)

Gid1 (23642) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172821)

500,000 *BARELY USED* Wireless GPS PDAs
Item # 112371802498652

Currently US $10.00
First bid US $1.00
Quantity 500,000
# of bids 27
Time left 7 days, 14 hours +

Location Washington DC 20233
Started Apr-02-10 19:24:52 PST

=)

Paper (1)

SanGrail (472847) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172403)

That would be a pretty vast amount of paper/trees saved.
Might actually help re: Greenhouse Gas emissions.

Nice to see that some parts of the government are doing something (even if it's not deliberate),
seeing as the Bush-Bot Mark 2 doesn't give a damn.

(Remember the Kyoto Climate Change Agreement - which everyone else in the world signed?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/bush/story/0,7369,526607 ,00.html [guardian.co.uk]
http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/07/23/kyoto.t alks/ [cnn.com]

Knee? Meet Jerk. (2)

gvonk (107719) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172513)

The idiotic Kyoto Agreement needed so much work that only ONE industrialized country signed it (Romania).
The fact is that NOT A SINGLE COUNTRY in the EU has signed it, and they are usually even more enviro-radical than some of the moron greens here.

Get your facts straight.

Re:Knee? Meet Jerk. (1)

Voxol (32200) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172554)

Everyone else said yes they think it should be signed.

Ratification hasn't happened yet. Romania is an early taker a I suppose.

EU one step from Kyoto ratification
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci /tech/newsid_1 854000/1854038.stm

Re:Paper (1)

SanGrail (472847) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172563)

My error - actually, the US, (& 'everybody else') HAS signed the protocol.

But the George Bush said that the US will not be ratifying the agreement.

The protocol will only come into effect if 55 nations ratify it, including the countries responsible for at least 55% of the developed worlds emissions - and since the US accounts for 25% of those emission, it was a fricken big set back.

But, in Bonn, Germany, in July last year, 178 nations agreed with the protocol, and as of February 2002, 47 of the needed 55 countries have ratified it.
http://www.rso.cornell.edu/greens/kyotonow/kyotopr otocol.html [cornell.edu]

Palm Vx pretty cheap (1)

jsapo (512293) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172420)

I got mine from the factory, refurbished for only 139 bucks... I'm sure in 8 years they'll still have refurbished current ones, and at the rate of depreciation that handhelds have, there should be a huge secondary market.

They should talk to UPS (5, Interesting)

nurightshu (517038) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172423)

Every day, our drivers use their DIAD (Delivery Information Acquisition Device) IIIs to track the millions of packages delivered and picked up. They're wireless, but in the event that they're out of RF range, the information is buffered and then re-transmitted by the DIAD Vehicle Adapter (DVA), which also provides trickle charge capabilities. If all else fails, the DIAD can transfer its batch at the end of the day when it's placed in its cradle at the center.

We don't currently have GPS in the DIAD III, but the prototype DIAD IVs (which run on PocketPC 2002...ugh) do. They'll not only give drivers who lose their way directions to the next delivery destination, they will also broadcast their location back to the center, which will allow center supervisors and managers to determine more efficient driving routes and coverage areas.

overstepping bounds (1)

SgtXaos (157101) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172426)

The census is only legally authorized to *count* the population. All the other sundry data they collect is the result of a(nother) government power grab. Of course the constitution is becoming more and more just so much bird cage-liner.

Re:overstepping bounds of propriety (1)

TiggerStripe (556105) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172481)

Constitution, as you say, can be used for many things.. like wrapping Big Macs in. It's the next big thing. I'm not OT here am I? Sure hope not. This is relevant stuff!

We already have the product... (2, Interesting)

Jonavin (71006) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172427)

... the price will drop by 2009.

Samsung SPH-i330 [samsungelectronics.com]

Unnatural Acts (2, Funny)

invckb (551932) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172438)

plus people will commit unnatural acts to sell a half-million computers.

And what are those unnatural acts, I want to know. Maybe I am in the wrong career.

Re:Unnatural Acts (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172455)

Re:Unnatural Acts with a Carnivore (1)

TiggerStripe (556105) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172487)

I'll sell Al Gore's left testicle, punch out Prime Minister Chretin (Canadian dude, if you must know...) and sell Mike Tyson to the Arabs as a secret weapon to sell a half million wee boxen. That's plenty unnatural to some folks. Alternatively, I could just walk around town come St. Paddy's in naught but the one-button suit an' the green grease-y paint!! Maybe that option's the better, what do the moderators think?? OK there I feel much better. WHEEEEEeeee!!!

A faster, more accurate census count! (2, Funny)

AlaskanUnderachiever (561294) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172443)

That's right, you had hanging Chads last year. Can't you just wait for the inevitable "hotsync reporting errors" and "field information loss" due to battery malfunction? Ahh the federal government. Constantly finding ways to add complexity to any situation.

Already done with laptops (2)

Perianwyr Stormcrow (157913) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172508)

My girlfriend once worked for the Census Bureau, and she used a laptop for her surveys (carrying 3 spare batteries at all times...)

Given the current state of affairs, this is certainly evolutionary, not revolutionary.

Watch your taxes (1)

inerte (452992) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172468)

What is more expensive? Paper and pen or PDA?

Yes,

Re:Watch your taxes (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172917)

pen and paper, after you count the money and time it takes to count and sort all the paper forms.

You would be crazy (2)

nzhavok (254960) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172474)

You would be crazy to think we won't be able to have this in 8 years. You can already get cell phones with GPS capability - couple that with a pocket PC and you're most of the way there technologically. Price-wise, well, I guess 8 years should be long enough to beat the price down.

And hopefully they will have enough ... (1)

chris_sawtell (10326) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172594)

sense to re-program them and use them at election time so that nonsense and corruption is avoided.

in eight years? (1)

sister_snape (552198) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172623)

We can easily do this much for this price in such a period of time. Hell, I expect it to be on a regular size wristwatch with skin conductance to a patch into the visual cortex at the speed things are moving. So this story is actually about how unimaginative the Census folks are.

Census? (1)

RobinH (124750) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172721)

Perhaps the U.S. should concentrate more on improving the election system before tackling the job of making the census more complicated!

Intelligent idea from the Department of Commerce (1)

z_gringo (452163) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172727)

It sounds like they want exactly what I want in one of those handhelds. They sure have come a long way since I worked there many many years ago. Incidentally, The Burueau of the Census was the first agency to put MAPs of nearly every single tiny little down in the country on to computers, including street names, alternate names etc.. So, they have always been on somewhat of a leading edge technology wise. When I was there, they were digitizing the maps onto Tektronix CAD stations that still ran CPM! Personally, I think they will be able to get pretty close to that target price. The Census Bureau doesnt get the respect it deserves..

Re:Intelligent idea from the Department of Commerc (1)

z_gringo (452163) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172729)

Incidentally, teh project was called the TIGER project, and the MAPs from it are available online. These maps are also used by many of the GPS systems these days..

http://tiger.census.gov/

Probably not (1)

smoyer (108342) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172837)

I don't see the $100 price point being met. If they bought today's technology in seven years, they would have a chance ... but today's technology won't be around in seven years.


What would they need today? A GPS, wireless link and a handheld would run them say $600 (come on, its the government ... we know they won't purchase the cheapest PDA. At a minimum, they'll want color). This would require the current prices to drop by a factor of six.


Think about the computer industry. The price of a PC has only dropped by about half during the last seven years, and the top of the line models still push the same $4k - $5k price of the original PC. I think that we will see a similar price structure for PDAs in 2010 ... $300 for the technology that they need.


What holds the prices in check? You constantly need more CPU and memory/storage to perform the same functions!


The funniest part of this story is that they're trying to limit the cost of the PDAs to $100 dollars (or a $50M total price tag) but they will go spend $200M to have an inept consulting firm write the software ... which then won't work anyway.


Open source census software anyone?

History is trying to repeat itself (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3172839)

Once again the needs of the Census Bureau would have the effect of pushing technology. The first punched card tabulating equipment (that later became -- for many years -- the primary input method for the digital computer) was invented for the 1890 Census.

$100 probably not far off... (1)

lanalyst (221985) | more than 12 years ago | (#3172998)

All of the hardware requirements exist today. Looking at Handspring, most list prices now are under $200 - and that's for 2-3 old technology. In 2-3 years, an iPaq 38xx could easily be selling in that range. GPS card today is about $200... Sierra card w/ service could be a wildcard...

In quanities of 500,000 8 years from now, this can easily be imagined in a wearable device.

Of course, my one large assumption is that the software will be developed based on an open source OS, avoiding the microsoft tax...

So what they're really saying is... (5, Interesting)

stienman (51024) | more than 12 years ago | (#3173078)

So what they're really saying is:

We want to give a $50,000,000 dollar contract to a company that can provide 500,000 rugged, easy to use, long lasting (14 hours of active use per charge minimum), PDAs with GPS and wireless communications.

That should be relatively simple, if they use a free OS. They don't need to be color, though it might help. They do need to be very easily visible. The display can be a larger 1/4 vga screen, which should be much less expensive to make than the current color PDA screens.

So, let's see... About twice as thick as an IPAQ, and about as wide and long as the old newtons. It wouldn't need to be a real computer, so you could go with only flash to hold the (optional) OS and program code with a compactflash slot for long term storage. The GPS unit will cost $10-15 in quantity, as will the GSM (or APRS, or 802.11b ;-). The LCD, touchscreen and battery will cost $30-40 together, and the processor, mainboard, and all associated electronics will be another $10-20. The enclosure will be maybe $5. Cheap labor would be $1-5.

Cost each unit:$56 - 80. The R&D (as well as breathing room for unexpected problems) would soak up the last $44-20.

This could be done in two years, including the development of software that is easily configurable to make census forms and input, enable the communications across the network, etc.

At the high end, it would leave $10,000,000 for the company doing the development, equivilant to 40 salaried employees for five years at $50,000/yr (yes, some would be more, a few would be less, but the dev time should be less than 3 years, and fewer than 40 employees are needed.) If the company doing the work generalizes the PDA enough(maybe adding local networking to the national networking, etc) then they could sell additional units to other customers. Hobbyists would pay a little for it, but it would mostly stay in the corporate sector.

That's my bid. I estimate about one year to get the company up and running, one year R&D, two years active development, one year for a limited test run, one year for a production run and distribution, and two years breathing room. The software will allow full remote updating, real time statistics collection, we'll engineer the systems needed to run the entire show, and contract the necessary infrastructure for the wireless data collection.

-Adam

real business costs, was :So what they're ... (2)

ghostlibrary (450718) | more than 12 years ago | (#3173348)

"it would leave $10,000,000 for the company doing the development, equivilant to 40 salaried employees for five years at $50,000/yr
...
That's my bid."

Well, get a project manager and an accountant and refine it, it might work. Here's one tip: double the salary cost to get the actual worker cost (once you factor in HR costs, payroll processing, matching social security, managerial/paperwork overhead, and hiring costs), i.e.a $50k employee costs the company $100k.

Which goes to show that operating a business isn't something that we comp sci folks are necessarily the best at. But (like you) we can do a good job specing out a project and then let someone modify our numbers!

(Running a business is always more expensive than it looks. Heck, just _filing_ an IPO is a half-million dollar cost!)

Ah, the paperless office. (2)

Bender Unit 22 (216955) | more than 12 years ago | (#3173218)

I don't use much paper myself. I think I get ten times as much paper in the mail as I use myself.

However I sure would miss the paper the few times I use it. Printing out a configuration file for some software or hardware, printing out a chapter of a PDF file. I sometimes need to avoid the noise in my cubicle and noting beats going in to a meeting room, close the door and concentrate of the paper on the table.
Some times I just unplug my laptop or bring my palmtop, but for some reason it really helps me to see it on paper where I can underline, cross over or write on the paper. If I were to ditch the paper completly the palm or the laptop would need to mimic the paper better. One would need a "palmtop" with the size of a A4 and the resolution and contrast. Then I would need to be able do draw, write on it.
If you could take the acrobat reader and look and draw on the documents like a real paper it would be great maybe even better. Lets say you had a manual for a program or some hardware as a PDF document where you could "mess it up" by writing and drawing on top of the document. A great feature it would be. You could choose to see it as a clean document or with your own markings.
Then I might avoid the paper all together.

Technological advancement (2)

sean23007 (143364) | more than 12 years ago | (#3173337)

If anyone doubts that in several years we'll have handhelds that have capabilities current devices cannot dream of at prices that you wouldn't imagine, I would point them to an excellent source of information: recent history. (Well, as recent as thirty years ago.) Computers were the size of a building and costed millions of dollars. If someone had told people that in a few decades there would be computers that could fit on your desk and would be hundreds of times as powerful as all of the computers on the planet at the time and be affordable for most Americans to own at least one... you wouldn't have believed him.

What evidence do we have to suggest that the rate of advancement (which is exponential), will not do the same again? We reached the limit of vacuum tubes, and we discovered the integrated circuit. Why should it be impossible to discover another breakthrough of that same magnitude?

Just take along a cell phone (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3173615)

Due to the E911 mandate every cellphone available for sale in America should have GPS in it by 2010. (OK - the E911 mandate doesn't state GPS explicitly, but I believe that GPS will win.)

Given the capabilities of the latest cellphones combined with GPS, they may be all that is necessary to conduct a census.
Load More Comments

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>