Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Origami Science

timothy posted more than 12 years ago | from the fortune-tellers-were-the-best dept.

Science 19

mpark6288 writes: "Alright, so we all remember elementary school, and the endless paper cuts that we got from trying to learn some origami. Some how my crane was always a boat. But, as News Factor: Sci Tech states: 'The theorem is, you can make any shape, and there is an algorithm for folding the piece of paper,' stated MIT Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering Erik Demaine said. Referencing applications of origami in robotic arm manipulation, bioinformatics, protein folding and molecular biology, Demaine said there is a multitude of possibilities from origami principles as simple as folding a square piece of paper in half and making one calculated cut. So who knows, those annoying little shuriken (throwing stars) that you made to throw at girls (eww cooties) could have been a major scientific breakthrough!"

cancel ×

19 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Pictures (1)

Account 10 (565119) | more than 12 years ago | (#3204989)


What a disappointing article ... it's all about shapes and there's not a single picture.

Folding without cutting (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3205010)

I can make a sphere without any trouble at all.

Hypercubes are a little bit more troublesome, but become obvious when I throw my little origami box at the wall and you watch it in 4 spatial dimensions.

Origami and airbags, who knew? (2, Funny)

zapfie (560589) | more than 12 years ago | (#3205052)

"They thought we might be able to adapt (origami-based) algorithms to solve their problem," Lang recalled. "Sure enough, it worked; now it's used to simulate airbags."

What wasn't mentioned was all the failed attempts to bring origami to airbags, including the infamous "1000-paper-cranes-exploding-in-your-face" airbag.

And I thought... (2, Funny)

AndrewRUK (543993) | more than 12 years ago | (#3205054)

And I though origami was just for making fleets of boats when you're bored during lectures :-)

Look ma (-1)

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM (537317) | more than 12 years ago | (#3205082)

I'm shaping a swan with my penis.

Origami F-14 (3, Interesting)

Eagle7 (111475) | more than 12 years ago | (#3205122)

I have directions for folding an F-14 Tomcat from a square of paper. It flies great, and even has airfoils on the wings and control surfaces on the tail. You can see a picture of it here [origamido.com] - it's the blue one in the middle.

The model is by Micheal LaFosse (you can find books by him with instructions for the "Aero-gami" F-14), and he has some other amazing models on this [origamido.com]
site.

I know this is not completely on topic, but I thought it would be interesting to fellow /.'s, and when else will it be even close to on topic. ;)

Re:Origami F-14 (2, Funny)

3waygeek (58990) | more than 12 years ago | (#3205426)

I have directions for folding an F-14 Tomcat from a square of paper. It flies great, and even has airfoils on the wings and control surfaces on the tail. You can see a picture of it here

So why are we paying millions of dollars for F-14s made of titanium?

Re:Origami F-14 (1)

zapfie (560589) | more than 12 years ago | (#3205665)

So why are we paying millions of dollars for F-14s made of titanium?

Where exactly were you planning on finding 500ft square pieces of paper to make these from? ;)

Re:Origami F-14 (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3205699)

The paper factory.

Re:Origami F-14 (4, Funny)

Eagle7 (111475) | more than 11 years ago | (#3206564)

I think it has something to do with that whole "combustion" thing. *shrug*

Some links (4, Informative)

Eigenray (317237) | more than 12 years ago | (#3205333)

Origami math [merrimack.edu] is cool... (check out the galleries [merrimack.edu] !)
hyperbolic paraboloids [uwaterloo.ca] are actually pretty easy and fun to make (and they drive the ladies wild ;).
The Five Intersecting Tetrahedra [merrimack.edu] are neat too but can get really hard when you're putting in the last couple.
And there's plently of theoretical stuff [uwaterloo.ca] ; for example, you can axiomitize [merrimack.edu] origami, and trisect angles and double cubes and stuff.
Some people have even made origami/combinatorial geometry courses [merrimack.edu] .

Re:Some links (-1, Redundant)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3205353)

Thanks for the links. New bookmarks for me!

Especially so since I just moved to Japan.

Origami Shurikens (3, Informative)

FunkyRat (36011) | more than 12 years ago | (#3205604)

Directions for making those cool paper shurikens can be found here [folds.net] .

Tip from the expert (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#3205884)

When making origami ninja stars, use two pieces of origami paper. Do not cut one sheet in half as directed in these instructions.

The two-sheet shurikens are heavier and more accurate than their single-sheet brethren. They make larger dents in drywall as well.

Re:Tip from the expert (1)

FunkyRat (36011) | more than 11 years ago | (#3206824)

Nice to know we have experts out there experienced in the black arts of paper weapons... You never know when you'll need to give someone a good papercut! :-)

Re:Tip from the expert (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#3207105)

> When making origami ninja stars, use two pieces of origami paper. Do not cut one sheet in half as directed in these instructions.
>
> The two-sheet shurikens are heavier and more accurate than their single-sheet brethren. They make larger dents in drywall as well.

"Pleasure to be of service, Mr. Atta, thank you for flying with us, next...

HALT! YEAH, YOU, BITCH! WHO THE FUCK DO YOU THINK YOU HARE? HAND OVER THOSE SHEETS OF ORIGAMI PAPER! NO WEAPONS ON BOARD!"

- Airline security goon to your Japanese grandmother, ca. 2003

It all comes flooding back (2)

Bazzargh (39195) | more than 11 years ago | (#3206397)

I corresponded for a while with Robert Lang in the mid-90s about this. I provided him with a handwaving proof of one of his conjectures (referred to obliquely in the 'Art of Origami' paragraph). This is only of historical interest now, but its still out there on the net:
http://origami.kvi.nl/articles/circles.ps
( incidentally all the origamis produced by the method in this paper do actually fold flat, and look like little mountain ranges with a long open pocket at their base)

As it turns out, a more concrete, and practical proof had been published in Japanese (tiling the plane with both triangles and quadrilaterals, not just triangles as in my paper). Some mathematicians in the states were sufficiently intrigued by my description of this on sci.math to have a closer look into paper folding, and came up with a proof that deciding if a given pattern of folds is flat-foldable is actually NP-complete.

All kudos to Robert. He has really put a lot of hard science into his origami programs and he is a truly impressive folder. I would recommend his book 'Origami Sea Animals' to anyone who wants their jaw to drop.

-Baz

Art and Science (1)

fruey (563914) | more than 11 years ago | (#3206452)

plenty of art in science

Is there? Or is it rather that there is plenty of science in art. Generally, research shows that art itself, if generally accepted to be "good", harks back to some scientific principle. Like most portraits having part of the eye along the central vertical axis, etc. It's all about geometry and natural forms, which all come down to science of molecule binding, the way atoms arrange themselves, etc.

For more on portraits and face perception, see this link on Amazon [amazon.com] , to the book of the study by 3 Scottish postgrads. I saw an exhibition of this at the Scottish National Portrait gallery and it was cool. Lot of science in portrait "art", for sure.

But then... if you're an artist you'd say there was plenty of science in art, and as a scientist the inverse.

What is cool with this origami stuff is that really folding in the natural world (protein folding, etc) predates everything by several million years. Now they're playing catchup, and it's getting really interesting.

"True" Origami (1)

apeine (191096) | more than 12 years ago | (#3217811)

Well, as far as I know, "true" origami is made with no cuts at all on the paper. If cuts were to be used on the paper for creating an origami, it would be so far easier to create shapes.
And as far as I can remember, some 30 years ago, a computer was used to create feasible origamis. Just crunching numbers, generating origamis, and all that could not be made were discarded. Sorry, no links on that, it was taken from a book.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?