Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Many Eyes, Shallow Bugs, and Spider-Man

CmdrTaco posted more than 12 years ago | from the entomology-incorrect-pun-goes-here dept.

Movies 191

Danious writes Seems Spider-Man is clocking up 'bugs' at movie-mistakes.com faster than any previous movie (now 95 and counting). The reason, according to this Independent article, is not that it may have more mistakes than usual, but that 'huge numbers of people are going to see it - and that makes for lots of pairs of eyes checking every inch of the screen.' The top movie is currently 'The Matrix' with 147." A lot of the bugs simply aren't really errors, and I'm sure the comic book guys out there can debate them.

cancel ×

191 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Open-source Spider-man immediately! (-1)

Chinese Karma Whore (560174) | more than 12 years ago | (#3501983)

Fate, chance, karma, whatever you wanna call it -- when Miss Fortune spreads her legs for you, you're already in over your head. Believe me, I know.

Bunny LaFever looked like a dame with more curves and venom than Reggie Peeler's Land O' Snakes. But she wasn't a real dame. She was a she-devil. That golden bush of hers was nothing but a welcome mat to hell.

But now I'm getting way ahead of myself. Bunny had a way of doing that to jerks like me. She twisted us inside out and turned our heads around so we couldn't think straight anymore. So lemme begin at the beginning ...

Carnies got a word for a crooked game operator like me. They call me "Flattie" cuz I'll flat-out rob you and make you like it.

My name's Randy Everhard and I've got a million ways to take your money. One of my personal favorites is the "hopper shot." It's tossing softballs into toilet seats, which you've seen on every midway in your life. I could gaff the joint to make it impossible to win.

But where's the fun in that? I work it so any chucklehead can win all night long. Cuz once I've hooked a live one into thinking he can take me for a ride, that's when I nail him with the "build-up." Caught up in the excitement of winning game after game, the rube's built up to play twenty games at two bucks a pop. And the only prize he's going home with is a teddy bear that cost me three shekels per, wholesale. You do the math, Einstein.

The problem with selling three-dollar plush for forty scoots is that the build-up only pays off if you've got a steady string of suckers. And that night was turning out to be a real larry. The Laff Riot carnival was a flattie's wet dream. The grab joints and flashy rides were a front for the real action: flat stories, alibi and percentage joints, crap tables, slot machines, fortune wheels.

The show was running wide open. Everybody crooked and every joint gaffed and nobody doing a damn thing to stop it. I figured the cops were greased slicker 'n Liberace's asshole. It should've been like shooting trout in a barrel. Too bad nobody was taking my bait. I was up shit creek without a paddle to piss on.

My first goddamn night with the show, and already I was itchy for a new angle.

I can't remember which one of them I saw first: the blonde come-on dressed like she had an exhibitionist streak a mile wide or the square in the coke bottle glasses who was eyeballing her like she was nothing but something to look at. Of course, that Coppertone beauty really was something to look at. She was turning heads and raising dicks all over the place. But I didn't like him getting his eyes all over this piece of 100 percent corn-fed cocktease.

She was stacked like a double-decker Ferris wheel with nipples that could cut glass. The red double-O's stenciled on her football jersey were stretched over humongous hooters. She looked like a shooting gallery, bursting at the seams. You couldn't miss those twin titty targets. I'm talking knockers so big you could still see them when she turned around. And believe you me, she was one woman who looked as good going as she did coming.

She wore a pair of daring Daisy Dukes that were so short and tight her crotch sucked them in. The denim over her ass was thread-bare, blown out like a retread. And if that wasn't enough, she was doing a number on a grape Popsicle to make your peter wish it was frozen on a stick. That girl was one carnival ride I wanted to jump on quick, and I didn't care how many tickets it cost.

In my racket, though, business comes before pleasure. And this looked like a golden opportunity to work the key scam. It's the oldest con in the carny book.

I jumped the counter and made my way over to the chump with the steamed-up glasses. I was like, "Hot enough for ya? And I ain't talking about the weather, fella." At first he didn't buy it when I told him I was the "manager" of this fine talent. He just stood there mopping his brow with a hanky.

"I don't fuck chickens and I don't shit feathers," I said, "and I wouldn't lie about a piece of ass like that, neither." I gave myself a hard-on feeding him the fast talk: screwing her would make a man think he died and gone to heaven, where the streets are paved with solid gold snatch.

"She's a sight for sore eyes, ain't she? And if you think I'm giving you lip, you oughta see her go to town on a dick. Life-transforming, friend. Life-transforming." I pulled out an old key I kept for just such an occasion. Dangling it before his bug eyes, I spieled how it was the key to her room at some motel outside of town. "I'm talking once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, pal. She's the reason hard-ons were made."

He swallowed it all -- hook, line and sinker.

Chuckling over what he was going to tell his wife when he came home minus his paycheck, I made my way over to the sultry sex kitten. She was throwing heat like a furnace. Melting chocolate bars at twenty paces. It was too hot to fuck, but next to her, that scorcher felt like a cool, seaside breeze.

"I just made you twenty bucks, and all you had to do was stand here looking gorgeous, Gorgeous." She didn't say anything, just looked me up and down and blinked those big baby blues. The sheen of sweat on her face glowed under the neon lights. She'd sucked all the flavor out of the end of the Popsicle, so the tip was white.

I fished out a crisp, new bill and passed it over. She let it rest in the palm of her hand as she stared at it, confused. She tried giving it back to me, but I stopped her. "See that guy over there?" I asked, stepping aside to give her a glimpse. "He just paid me a lot of money to sleep with you."

He what?" she goes, insulted. She threw down what was left of her Popsicle and took a step closer. Her eyes burned like a butane flame. Like most women, she looked better when she was steamed. But I didn't want her making a scene. She was liable to blow the act.

"Don't get yer panties in a bunch," I said, shutting her cakehole with my hand. I told her about the con and then nervously took my hand away. I was sure she was gonna blow up again. But she kept quiet. I told her we had to scram and didn't give her a chance to say no. I just put my arm around her waist and steered her toward the exit gates. I gave Pops a back-handed wave as we booked outta there double-time.

My dick is long and my cons are short. Cop and blow, that's my motto -- take the money and run. Otherwise things got a way of getting ugly.

Two minutes later, we were hauling ass down the highway in my supercharged Chevy Menace. It was an acid green two-door with cheetah seat covers, four on the floor and dual exhaust. Twin cams and 440 horses under the hood.

"Say," I said, "what's your name, anyway?"

I was hoping to get to know every inch of her better. She smelled like coconut oil. Her tanned skin gave off heat like asphalt that'd been baking in the sun all day.

"Bunny," she goes. "Bunny LaFever." She was a real piece, too. I couldn't wait to do all sorts of dirty things to her. "How much you take him for?" she asked. "Two-fifty." In actuality I scored three-fifty. But if there's one thing I know about women, it's never tell them exactly how much money you've got.

Back at my room at the God bless America Truckstop Motel, she showed me that that sweet and innocent show was just a put-on. I was glad, though. I prefer a girl with some experience under her belt.

Before I knew it, she was all over me like stink on shit. Purple from the Popsicle, her tongue sprung to the back of my throat and then snaked all over the inside of my mouth like she was mining the gold fillings out of my teeth. Despite all the tongue wrasslin,' her hands were nowhere near where I wanted them to be.

My dick had been so hard for so long I thought it would blast off like a rocket, but she kept her distance. The teasing was cute at first but enough was enough. I grabbed her hands and planted them on the tent pole in my pants.

She pulled away and took a few steps back.

"You trying to insult me? You think you can have this body for free?" Bunny squeezed her 'lopes together, serving them up for my hungry eyes: "These tits alone cost five bucks to look at."

I chuckled nervously. "C'mon," I go, "quit screwing around."

"I'm totally serious. Five bucks or I'm gone."

I started laughing for real, digging the little swindler. What else could I do but pay up? She had me right were she wanted me.

This was one of those times in a man's life when he knows his dick's doing the brainwork but he doesn't care. Whatever the dick wants, the dick gets. That right there's the whole story of my life.

I plucked a five-spot from my wallet and waved it like a flag of surrender. She just looked at it. "I don't want your money now," she goes. "Pay me later."

"Whatever you say." And I just eased back on the bed to enjoy the show.

She peeled off her T-shirt and out bounced those giant, all-natural juggs. She had razor sharp tan lines from the sling of a skimpy bikini top. You could tell from her nips that the air-conditioning was on full-blast.

Bunny danced around the room, wiggling and shaking everything her momma gave her. I looked her up and down until I could've guessed her weight. She had all the right parts in all the right places and then some.

She neared the bed and leaned over me to let those massive, all-American melons swing inches above my face. "Wanna taste them?" she goes. As if she had to ask.

I lifted my head to suck the tantalizing titties into my mouth, but she snatched them away.

"Five bucks," she goes.

"All right, five bucks."

"Five bucks each, big spender."

"You got it."

"Pay me later," she cooed, and moved closer to bury me beneath her treasure chest. "Mmm," she purred, "you suck real good."

"Damn straight," I mumbled. "You're getting my money's worth."

She only laughed as her fingers spider-walked down to my crotch and unzipped my fly. "You'd like a tit-fuck, wouldn't you?"

It wasn't a question. It was a statement of fact. Some girls are mind readers, but Bunny LaFever was the first dick reader I ever had the pleasure to meet.

"Twenty bucks," she barked.

I was like, "A bargain at twice the price. Pay you later?"

"That's right, bright boy."

We switched places on the bed so that she was on her back. I kicked off my shoes and pulled down my pants and underwear. This dick of mine's got its own zip code and time zone.

When she gripped the shaft, her fingers didn't reach all the way around. She was like, "Lucky for you I'm still in my size-is-everything phase."

"Me, too," I said, dropping to my knees to straddle her. My hard-on slipped between her cleavage like a hot dog in its steamed bun. She pressed them together to make the sandwich good and tight as I began my strokes.

I humped her hooters harder to push my dick closer to her succulent mouth. She stuck out her pink tongue and tickled the tip. Back and forth it fluttered over the head.

"There's a freebie," she giggled. "But I won't take one in the mouth for less than twenty."

"How much to swallow?"

She had to think that one over. "Thirty," she answered. "And that's only cuz I like you."

I dismounted and stood beside the bed. She sat on the edge of the mattress to let her mouth get better acquainted with my cock. Her tongue twirled over my shaft until it looked like a monument of polished marble.

She blew me good and slow, repeatedly bringing me to the edge of orgasm and then stopping until the urge melted away.

The build-up felt so good it hurt. I never begged anyone for anything before. But tortured by her talented tongue, I was actually begging for mercy.

After some more tongue lashing, she finally let me fill her mouth. She swallowed, too, and it felt like my whole body was sliding down with it.

could it be... (-1)

stallo (575157) | more than 12 years ago | (#3501984)

...another frozen post for stallo?

How about the most serious bug of all? (2)

treat (84622) | more than 12 years ago | (#3501990)

The silly attempt at a romance plot, perhaps just to create someone to be kidnapped, or perhaps because the powers that be required that this movie have romance in it. I'm all for a sweet romance story, even mixed in with my action movie, if it's not going to be so pathetic and forced. I'd like to see a cut of the movie with the uesless scenes removed.

Re:How about the most serious bug of all? (5, Insightful)

jeffersonebell (248978) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502012)

I would agree that the romance plot may not have been done exceptionally well, but to say that it's useless is a bit strong. Parker's relationship with M.J. is one of the cornerstones of his personality. Without her, he becomes Batman - a vigilante. With her grounding him, he keeps his ties to the 'real' world in a way that would be impossible with just his Aunt.

Re:How about the most serious bug of all? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502039)

Not without a little slip and slide with the aunty.

Re:How about the most serious bug of all? (1)

ahoehn (301327) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502588)

Idonno, twice during the movie I felt physically sick because of the romantic dialogue, it was just so terribly written. True, some of the dialogue was written 'badly' to sound like a comic book, but in the hospital love scene, and the final MJ/Peter talk, it went way beyond comic book badness into the realm of sickening.

Re:How about the most serious bug of all? (2)

RestiffBard (110729) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502033)

the relationship between Parker and Mary Jane has always been a part of Spider-Man. The movie would have been awful if that hadn't been there. And, uh, I never want to see a cut of the film minus the rain scene. :)

Re:How about the most serious bug of all? (4, Insightful)

jidar (83795) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502042)

I'm sick of people saying this. If you knew anything at all about the character you would know that the "silly romance plot" is exactly the type of thing you see in Spider-Man. In the comics the Mary Jane plotline is just as much a part of the comics as anything else, hell for the longest time it was the -primary- plotline. Personally I think the movie did an excellent job of translating it to the big screen.

Re:How about the most serious bug of all? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502116)

You're just jealous because, unlike you, Spidey's kissed a girl.

They're not all Gone With The Wind (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502219)

It's a comic-book story with comic-book action and comic-book romance. It succeeds at delivering all of this. Get a grip and learn to enjoy life a little.

-Jeff

Re:How about the most serious bug of all? (1)

DavidRavenMoon (515513) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502620)

The silly attempt at a romance plot...

But that is part of the Spider-Man story. He eventually ended up marrying Mary Jane.

IMDB.com (3, Interesting)

rosewood (99925) | more than 12 years ago | (#3501991)

I had never heard of this site. I have always relyed on IMDB to tell me everything about a movie. Ive always found it interesting that normally, after a DVD comes out - more goofs are added. Also, some movies you can clearly tell the goof information came straight from the director's mouth in the commentary track :P.

bugs (5, Funny)

hitchhacker (122525) | more than 12 years ago | (#3501994)

"A lot of the bugs simply aren't really errors"

they're features.

-metric

Re:bugs (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502214)

Careful with that joke, its an antique.

Seriously, how can somebody mod such a worn out joke as funny?

The sad thing is that the joke is so obvious that there will probably be 4 - 5 redundant posts.

"not bugs! features!" HA! Jesus, its killer how you slipped in a joke that wasn't really that funny the first time (fifteen years ago).

Re:bugs (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502438)

No worries, I'll hit them with my METAMOD stick. They will pay dearly.

Re:bugs (1)

asavage (548758) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502344)

most aren't actually bugs. if you read them a lot are just people commenting on interestings 'easter eggs' they found in the film. Also some are just stupid like the following bug submission:

As a person who once lived in New York City, I know for a fact that the Board of Education in NYC does not provide for school buses for its high school students. Instead,high school students are given train/bus passes to go to school for free.

Re:bugs (1)

BiggestPOS (139071) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502433)

Well, remember he didn't live in The City. He wanted to move there After Graduation. He probably lived in a burb, maybe in Jersey?

Re:bugs (-1)

tealover (187148) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502596)

No, you stupid bitch. Didn't you read the mistakes? All people who live in NYC's outer 4 boroughs refer to NYC as "The City", as in "We're going into the city tonight". No one in the outer 4 boroughs calls Manhattan by its real name.

Re:bugs (1)

yellowjacket03 (470997) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502603)

In the comics and the movie, Peter grew up in Queens.

Re:bugs (3, Interesting)

GreyyGuy (91753) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502569)

I know this was meant as a joke, but it is correct in this case. Most of these continuity "errors" are storytelling. There are a couple about how Mary Jane and the tram falling are reflected in his goggles, but that is more of a visual storytelling trick then a mistake.

It seems like most of the other half are people pointing out how many times they saw the movie to notice things like people that look like other Marvel heroes in the background or references to other Marvel people. I would say at least half of the "bugs" are more easter egg sort of things included in the film.

Re:bugs (-1)

YourMissionForToday (556292) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502613)

Don't forget that people who sit around and point out error after error in a movie are total assholes. Also, they must enjoy the movie because they keep watching it over and over.

it's my hypothesis that like pathetic autograph seekers, they are desperate to be involved with the movie in any way possible.

AAAAAAAAAAhhhhhh!!!!! (-1)

Serial Troller (556155) | more than 12 years ago | (#3501997)

FEED ME [drunkmonkey.org] !!

Matrix II and Bugs (5, Funny)

sisukapalli1 (471175) | more than 12 years ago | (#3501998)

How about Matrix II RC2 that will fix majority of the bugs from Matrix I?

Re:Matrix II and Bugs (1)

MrHat (102062) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502072)

That would be Matrix I SP1, not Matrix II RC2. Don't you know anything about movies? :)

Re:Matrix II and Bugs (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502323)

Buy Matrix SP1 [amazon.com] at Amazon.

Re:Matrix II and Bugs (2, Funny)

bay43270 (267213) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502343)

Or download Matrix Service Pack 1, which not only fixes 51 bugs, but adds 3 new scenes.

" It's not a bug, (1)

popeydotcom (114724) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502009)

it's an opportunity for development".

That was quick... (0)

O'Bunny (325700) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502010)

Slashdotted already. Wow.

Re:That was quick... (1)

popeydotcom (114724) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502036)

It gets a LOT of hits anyway. The site is frequently offline or slow.

Incidentally the guy who runs the site used to appear on the Big Breakfast [channel4.com] on Channel 4 [channel4.co.uk] in the UK. He'd show the latest submissions to his site on the programme each week.

That was before the programme got axed, anyway.

Re:That was quick... (1)

Nogami_Saeko (466595) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502122)

Lol...

When you see a note from the site admin _before_ it gets slashdotted saying "things are getting faster so we're accepting posts again", THEN you get /.'ed, you know the server is in deep trouble.

Hmm (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502015)

Well, since the entire movie is based on the premise that one can be bitten by a radioactive spider and develop the ability to spawn web from your wrists (and not your nipples), seems like mucho developmente follows from there. Plus in the original preview they showed the twin towers which clearly don't exist.

Re:Hmm (1)

popeydotcom (114724) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502025)

Plus in the original preview they showed the twin towers which clearly don't exist.

I appreciate the sensitivity of this particular subject. However, if you're gonna whine about it, you'll have to ditch just about every episode of Friends ever made. They nearly all have at least one shot of the twin towers.

Re:Hmm (1)

ObviousGuy (578567) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502046)

Six twenty-somethings living in luxury apartments in the heart of New York with job titles of "Paleontologist", "Out of work actor", "Aspiring chef", "Coffee waitress", "Gay department manager", and "Street musician" are what make Friends unbelievable, not the presence of buildings that actually existed when the show was being filmed.

Re:Hmm (1, Insightful)

pajor (310214) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502058)

Plus the fact that no black people seem to live in New York...

Re:Hmm (1)

popeydotcom (114724) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502067)

..and no conversation lasts longer than 2.5 minutes.

Re:Hmm (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502070)

No, that's totally believable.

Re:Hmm (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502053)

Spiders spin web from pretty much a sac around the anus if I remmeber correctly. Trolls do your duty and show us that ANUS!!!!

Re:Hmm (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502289)

Arachnologists doing comparative genetic studies between spiders and mammals have pretty much determined that the silk sacs on spiders are the equivalent of the mammary glands on mammals. Milk and spider threads are even chemically similar.

Re:Hmm (1)

OpenSourcerer (515213) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502350)

Got web?

or better still

Got silk?

I went there yesterday... (4, Interesting)

artemis67 (93453) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502021)

Most of the "mistakes" that are being filed are NOT mistakes, just kids inventing mistakes. The owner of the site confesses that he hasn't seen the movie yet (he's in the UK), so he's not really in a position to make any judgement calls on these.

Re:I went there yesterday... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502100)

So what you're saying is that movie-mistakes is the movie equivalent of Slashdot? Nobody sees the movies (reads the articles), guy hasn't seen the movie (editor checks the articles), and kids just make shit up (linux zealots).

Re:I went there yesterday... (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502153)

lol mod to +5!

Re:I went there yesterday... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502258)

AOL weenie

Full text from page... [long] (2, Informative)

Ando[evilmedic] (199537) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502024)

In Jameson's office, during the scene where he first hears about Spiderman, he has two T.V.'s behind him. Not only do the channel's change, but you can see Sam Rubin, movie critic for the Channel 5 news out in L.A., not New York. After the amazing Channel change you see the channel 7 news (discernible by the small blue 7 in the corner), also in L.A.

The scene at Columbia University was filmed on an unseasonably warm spring day, however, the costume department had provided the high school extras with cold-weather clothing. The real Columbia University students can be seen in the background wearing shorts and t-shirts by contrast.

In the final battle, when the Green Goblin steps on Spider-Man's wrist, and says "You've spun your last web...", Spider-Man looks up at him, and you can see Peter's right eye, due to the missing half of the mask, but the left eye is still covered with the reflective lens. But when the Green Goblin says "M.J. and I will have a hell of a time", Spider-Man looks back up at him, and you can see both of Peter's eyes, with just the lens missing from the almost intact left side of the mask.

When Spider-Man is taking snapshots of the armored car burglary, one of the burglars says "watch the street". As the camera snaps you see them pointing rifles or machine guns towards the sky and when Spider-Man lands on them to dispatch them, the weapons are gone...

When Spiderman is chasing the crook with the gun, the crook shoots through the roof of the car. In one segment you can see the bullet holes from the overhead shot. As the scene moves along there is another overhead shot - no bullet holes. Seconds later the bullet holes return.

Concerning where Peter places his book bag after he gets home after being bit by the spider. As he walks in, you see him throw it down right in front of him and he steps around it, and walks towards the stairs. The book bag is smack dab in the middle of the entrance. Anyone who comes in and doesnt look down will certainly trip. However, as he walks up the stairs and his aunt and uncle remain downstairs, you can see in the background that the bag has mysteriously moved to the left side, and is leaning against the wall right next to the coat rack.

In the parade scene, Peter spots MJ and Harry on the balcony and Harry sees Peter on the ground. Yet, when MJ is falling from the balcony after it crumbles, the distance to the ground is much farther than a few storeys.

Not a mistake, just something for fans of the comic. At the end of the movie, you can see the headstone with Stacy, Gwen on it. That was Peter's first girlfriend, and in the comic she was thrown off the bridge and died. It was a major motivating factor in his life, and the reason he did not get with MJ for so long.

Where did Spider-man get his new costume from - surely he wasn't capable of making it himself?

During the movie, Peter aquires a "spider sense" that warns him of danger even if he dosen't see it himself. In the apartment fire scene the Green Goblin disguises himself as a woman with a blanket to surprise Spider-man, every one in the cinema can easily see it is the Goblin thanks to the shape of the blanket over the awkward pointy mask, Spider-man even reaches out for the "woman" and nearly taps her in the shoulder yet the spider sense never goes off.

In the scene where goblin attacks the daily bugle, JJJ tosses his cigar at the window, it bounces off with a thud on the center piece of wood that is the frame of the window and falls back into the room, not out the window, therefore it couldn't have been tossed back in the office on JJJ's desk by the Green Goblin.

Why didnt Green Goblin just take off Spiderman's mask when he knocked him out with sleeping gas? Wasn't he interested in knowing who Spiderman really was?

After Peter submitted his Spider-man photos to get his 300 dollars, he talks to a lady saying "I am a photographer". The shot's taken from Peter's back, showing a camera hanging around Peter's neck. After the lady responds "Yes I can see that" and the focus goes back to Peter, there's nothing hanging around his neck.

It may just be me but, when Peter suddenly stops wearing his glasses shouldn't his aunt and uncle have noticed? M J notices at school yet the people that have raised him never say anything.

When the Goblin drops Mary Jane from the bridge, why does it appear that she has fallen directly beneath Spidey (as shown in the lens reflection)? Spidey is nowhere near that close to her. The reflection would look like that if he dropped her.

Peter Parker use a manual focus, manual wind camera throughout the film, yet in the sequence where he photographs himself as spiderman, the camera happily auto-winds and auto-focuses...

Aunt May obviously flinches a second before the Green Goblin crashes through the wall.

We all know that Peter Parker wears his Spidey suit under his clothes in case of an emergency, that way he can make a quick change. But what about the boots to his Spidey suit? He can't wear them under his shoes because they are too thick and isn't seen holding a big enough bag. So where does he keep them?

In the Thanksgiving dinner scene, watch Mary Jane's arms. In the long shots, her hands are in her lap. When she is shown close up, her arms are folded. They jump back and forth between the two positions.

During the upside down kiss between Spiderman and MJ his mask is halfway removed while they kiss, but after they are done kissing and the camera cuts to Spiderman slinging upward and away his mask is suddenly back on without any help from MJ or himself.

In the scene where Mary Jane is being mugged by four men, Spider-Man throws two of the men into two windows behind Mary Jane. Then the camera goes back to Spider-Man beating up the other two guys. When the camera goes back to Mary Jane the two windows are intact.

Not a mistake, just something to spot - in the scene with Bonesaw in the wrestling match, if you watch the crowd closely, you can notice several Marvel cameos. For instance the four people in the corner look remarkably like the fantasic four (the blond haired guy, the guy with white hair at his temples holding the hand of the blonde haired woman, and a rather tough looking guy). You'll also notice Wolverine from the X-men doing the "Bonesaw" gesture. You can also see a blind, blonde haired man standing by himself looking rather content, this seems to be Matt Murdoc from Daredevil.

When Peter Parker first discovers he can climb up walls (while in citizen clothing), he tests it out by climbing up a building in an alley. During this scene, you can clearly see his clothes hanging out forwards, indicating that the scene was filmed with him crawling along a floor horizontally.

When you first see the cable car (at the end) it says Universal Pictures. When you see the car the second time, it says Roosevelt Line.

When Peter shoots his web at his bedroom lamp and pulls it across the room, it smashes against the wall and breaks. But when Aunt May is talking to Peter from the door seconds later, the lamp is back on the dresser in one piece.

When Peter first learns he can climb wall after running out of school, his shoes are different when he is on the wall compared to when he is on the roof.

When Peter is taking out the trash, and begins talking to MJ, as MJ walks toward him you can see her underwear sticking out above her pants. As the shots change, this underwear seems to appear and disappear.

When Peter dumps the food tray on Flash his shirt gets covered with food. In the next scene they are in the school hallway and Flash's shirt is clean.

When Peter and his uncle are talking in the car, almost every time the shot changes to Peter you can see the same blond walking by (3 times) and the same redhead (2 times). You will even see one of the female extras stopping and looking in the direction of the car, only to have a male extra appear to tell her to keep walking.

Not really a mistake just something to see, at that youth festival when the green goblin throws his grenades and the crowds react, right before they get a shot of Parker, you see Stan Lee (creator of Spiderman).

As an abstract signature, Sam puts the oldsmobile from "The Evil Dead", in all of his movies. I think at one point in time it belonged to a relative of Bruce Campbell. But you can find it in "Army Of Darkness" and "Darkman". Now correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't good ol' uncle Ben driving that same Oldsmobile when giving pete a ride to the "library"?

Right before the goblin attacks the Daily bugle you can see that J Jonah Jameson is wearing Spider-man suspenders. I thought this was worth a laugh.

In the beginning, when Peter runs out to catch the bus, he swings his backpack over his shoulder, but when he is seen running after the bus, the backpack has disappeared.

In the establishing scene of the owner of the Newspaper firm talking about how he thinks Spiderman is a criminal, you see a woman on the right holding a tan envelope, but as the camera cuts back and forth you see it disappear and reappear again.

When the tram with all the kids is falling, the kids are yelling. The adult behind them isn't yelling & looks bored.

I the scene where Spiderman is fighting Bonesaw in the cage match, a woman from outside the ring hands Bonesaw a chair and he hits Spiderman over the head with it, bending it. However in the next shot you see a perfectly straight chair in Bonesaw's hand and then he hits Spiderman with a chair again bending it for a second time.

In the school cafeteria after Peter saves MJ, he notices the fork that is stuck to his hand. If you look at the back of his hand, the spider bite is gone. In the next scene, it is back again.

When Peter is talking to Mary Jane outside the diner, the same man is seen walking across the background 3 or 4 times. During the same scene, a black SUV also makes a few passes.

During the brief fight between Peter and the man that killed Uncle Ben, the guy had a gun in his hand, after being banged around he lost his gun and produced a switch knife from his pocket instead. But then the very next shot he has the gun again in his hand.

After Spider-Man saves MJ after the World Unity Festival and is swinging quickly away, he is carrying her so that she is facing backwards. When we see a shot of MJ smiling, however, her hair is blowing very lightly in the direction they're heading.

In the scene where Peter Parker is walking behind Mary Jane, just after they both leave for school, and Mary Jane's father is yelling at her on the street, you see the yellow bus approaching behind them, with no car in front of the bus. As the camera angle changes, you see a black convertible pull up to pick up Mary Jane, and it arrives before the bus, even though the car was nowhere to be seen a second prior.

When Peter is drawing up ideas for his costume the hand is that of comic artist Phil Jimenez, current artist of Wonder. Phil Jimenez is right handed and Tobey is left handed. In one of the cuts the pen is in Tobey's left hand but it shows him drawing with his right.

When the glider hits the goblin, it appears to impact in the middle of his chest. Later you see the glider only waist high as he tells Peter "Don't tell Harry."

At the World Unity Festival, Peter is taking pictures. When he looks up at Harry and M.J. on the balcony, his camera, which has been your average "right handed" camera throughout the film, magically becomes a "left handed" camera.

In the balcony scene, Peter is in the crowd taking pictures and at one point spots Harry and Mary Jane (MJ) together. MJ is holding a martini glass in her hand as she talks to Harry. In the rest of the scene she is holding a champagne glass.

In the scene when MJ is kissing Spider-Man, at an angle you can see a string that is hanging by his shoulder. But when he goes back up there isn't one.

When Mary Jane and Peter are talking in the street right after she left the diner, every time a car passes by behind her and then the camera goes to Peter, those cars would mysteriously vanish since you can clearly see that there are no moving vehicles behind him.

When Peter finally catches up to the bus in the beginning, his hair is flat and all sweaty from running. Then he gets tripped by a fellow student and when he gets up his hair is all blown dry and perfect.

During the bridge scene the tram/cable car was obviously anchored on the other end when the Green Goblin was holding it to make Spider-Man choose which one to save, but after he drops it and when Spider-Man grabs the tram/cable car to keep it from falling, it is no longer anchored, instead it became sort of an yo-yo and somehow was secured at the end of the snapped cable.

After Spidey saves MJ for the first time, there's a stain on Harry's shirt while he's talking on his cell. Then it cuts to Peter, then back to Harry. When it comes back to Harry, there's no stain on Harry's shirt.

In the graduation day scene as Norman Osbourne is talking with Peter Parker, Norman's right hand is on Parker's left shoulder then off. This happens a few times as the camera angle switches.

When Peter and MJ are talking outside the diner, MJ's trechcoat collar is first lying flat, then is tucked in, then is flat, happens several times when the shot goes back and forth from Peter to MJ.

When Harry introduces Peter to his father, Norman, and they're talking on the steps, there's a redhead in a purple sweater that walks behind Norman probably 3 or 4 times.

When Peter and Osborne are talking, their distance from the balloons changes.

When the Osbourne father is getting ready to perform the government experiment in superhumanism on himself, he takes off his shirt while he is talking to an assistant professor. It is extremely obvious at this point that while the sound of him talking keeps going, his mouth is shut.

In the scene where Goblin blasts into Aunt May's bedroom to scare her, she is praying with her back to the wall/window that is blasted out. Yet her only injury is three small cuts on the right cheek of her face (which was away from the blast). Later in the hospital, the three small cuts have changed position.

In the final battle scene, Goblin's costume alternates between clean (green) and dirty (white/dusty) throughout the scene.

In the wrestling scene the cage is lowered around the ring for the match. The announcer instructs the assistants to lock the 'doors' of the cage. In fact there are no doors. We see the assistants chaining and locking the 'corners' of the cage. Then at the end of the match when 'Spiderman' has won, the cage is immediately lifted away from the ring and there are no locked chains on the corners.

In the scene where Peter Parker is taking M.J.'s picture for the school paper, the spiders dissapear.

At the end when Spiderman dumps the brick wall on the Green Goblin, the wall is seen nice and neat (when it fell), but when the Green Goblin sticks out his hand, the wall is completely destroyed.. and it's grey.

In the scene where Spidey is stopping the armored car robbery, he dispatches several thugs with some fancy, acrobatic fighting. When he lands, a money bag is visible at his feet that wasn't there before.

In the last scene where Spider Man beats up the Green Goblin, Spider Man is right next to him smashing him in the face. When Norman Osborn reveals himself as the Green Goblin, however, the camera is shot at a different angle and Spider Man is instantly a yard or so away from him.

In the scene when the Osborne is testing the performance enhancers on himself, his heart stops. His assistant comes in and begins to apply pressure to his heart and doesn't remove the arm restraints. The next shot is shown from further away and the arm restraints are removed.

In the scene where Parker is chasing the robber into the abandoned warehouse you see the a shot of the robber holding the gun in his left hand and carring the money bag in his right hand. However the next shot you see him load a clip into the gun with the bag in his left hand and the gun in his right hand.

How did the referee get back into the cage during the match so quickly when the cage was still just rising?

When Peter is beating up the robber that killed his uncle, he smashes his head into both windows of double doors. When he smashes the glass, the same shot is used twice to show his head smashing the glass.

If Peter had to sign consent forms for the wrestling match, wouldn't the promoter know his real identity and tell everyone who Spidey was once Spider-Man was in the news? He had seen Peter's face and would DEFINITELY remember the creep who let the robber get away.

Lucy Lawless makes a cameo in this film - when they are talking to people about Spider-Man, she appears as a punker with red hair and says the line 'A man with 8 arms? Sounds like a good time to me.' I thought it was funny how at least 3 actors from Sam Raimi's other ventures (Xena, Hercules, Jack of All Trades, etc...) made cameos in this movie.

When Peter runs into MJ leaving her job at the diner, She is seen from a rear angle closing her jacket but when she turns around, the jacket is not closed. The same thing happens again when she is telling Peter not to tell Harry.

After Peter picks up his 'winnings' from the wrestling promoter, we see the sillouette of the robber using his right hand (holding the gun) to hit the promoter on the left side of the head. After the robber escapes and the promoter askes Peter why he didn't stop him, the promoter is injured on the right side of the head.

When Norman Osborn (Willem Dafoe) is preparing for the super soldier experiment, he is seen wearing a watch on his left hand. After he removes his shirt, the watch isn't there.

When Harry gets out of the Rolls Royce and goes to school, you see several people in the background staring towards the camera. The scene pans to the left, and it seems that the people realised that they would show up in the shot, because they immediately ignore him, and continue walking.

In the scene where Peter is following M.J. to the bus stop (the morning after he was bitten), while Peter is talking to her we see the bus start to pull up behind him. Moments later one of M.J.'s friends pulls up in a green Mustang. The scene cuts back to Peter, and we see the bus pass by him again. Don't you think the bus would've passed the Mustang?

This is not a mistake, only a cameo appearance. Jameson (the boss at the newspaper) has the male assisstant who is dressed completely in black and has the glasses. This is in fact the director's brother, Ted Raimi.

In the opening scenes, Ben Parker is talking to May about his being laid off "after 23 years as the head electrican." Isn't it odd then (in a later scene when Ben is at the kitchen table repairing an electrical cord) that he doesn't know how to properly strip the insulation? He mangles it badly using what looks like needle nose pliers. No wonder they laid the old guy off.

When Peter leaves the house with Uncle Ben, when Ben gives Peter a ride to the Library (wrestling event), Peter has nothing in his hands. When he leaves Ben's car, he has a brown paper bag.

As a person who once lived in New York City, I know for a fact that the Board of Education in NYC does not provide for school buses for its high school students. Instead,high school students are given train/bus passes to go to school for free. [One contributor said: He's not in New York. He's on one of the outskirting cities. This is evident when he's talking with Mary Jane outside as he throws away trash, and they talk about how they're gonna make it big in "The City". This, however has been countered by someone else, saying that if you live (and especially if you grew up) in the "outer boroughs" (Brooklyn and Queens especially), you refer to MANHATTAN as "the city"; thus Pete and MJ would refer to moving into "the city" meaning Manhattan even though they technically live in New York City as residents of the borough of Queens - so they ARE residents of New York City. I think this'll have to be a "make your own mind up" entry...]

Just before the Green Goblin takes off his mask at the end of the show, his visors are up, allowing his eyes to be seen. But after he dies, the camera shows a shot of the mask with the visors back down.

In the appartment fire scene, Spiderman enters the building twice. In between time the fire backdrafts (explodes) out the building several times from different windows before and after Spiderman enters. Backdrafts only happen once, then the fire escalates rapidly never returning to a more passive state without intervention.

How come you never see Peter's mouth move when he is talking in the Spiderman costume? The mask is spandex just like the rest of the costume, so you would see evidence of Peter's mouth moving when he talks.

In the lunch scene, everyone notices Peter dragging the lunch tray. This seems like something noticeable to a point that they would say something when the Daily Bugle is asking who Spiderman is. Something that's not easily forgotten.

In every other version of Spiderman - comics, cartoons, films, games, etc., Spiderman gets his web from web cartridges, not his wrists. Also, if he could shoot web from his wrists, how is it that he can shoot through clothing without making a hole? [In an interview, director Sam Raimi stated that he made the decision to make Parker's web-shooters genetic. His logic was that large chemical companies cannot develop adhesive chemicals with the capabilities of Parker's web, so how should we believe that a high school kid could create something like that in his bedroom? He struggled with this, but in the end it simply made more sense. This is probably the only comic/film discrepancy I'm going to include, just to stop people sending it to me. No other differences though, please.]

At the bridge scene, MJ begins to climb down the steel cable, then the Green Goblin swoops in, attacks Spider-man and causes her to fall a considerable distance, yet she manages to catch on to the rail on the cable car. Now unless MJ has super powers of her own, cathing on to a rail after falling from that distance would be nearly impossible. Her arms would be yanked right out of the socket.

In the scene where Spiderman returns Norman's body to his home (to fulfill Osborn's last request to keep the truth from his son), Harry retrieves a handgun from the table drawer. The firearm is an internal hammer, double action semi-automatic pistol; yet we distinctly hear a cocking sound, something that isn't part of preparing such a weapon for firing. (Note: the pistol must have also had a cartridge chambered since we didn't see Harry cycle the slide to load a round.)

When Spiderman returns to Peter and Harry's appartment (for Thanksgiving dinner after the firey appartment fight with Goblin), the slashing injury to his arm changes positions (from the apartment to the ceiling of his room to the dinner table).

When Peter Parker is in his original sweater and mask (wrestling costume) and is chasing the man who shot his uncle, the camera spins while he is on a roof looking over the city, and he has his later costume on. A second later he is back in his wrestling uniform.

In the bridge scene, the orientation of the elements of the scene gets very confusing. There are so many camera angles that understanding where everything is becomes difficult. Nevertheless, it is very apparent that when Spiderman runs to dive off the bridge (to save MJ and the cable car), he jumps off the wrong side of the bridge.

When "the human spider" is facing Bonesaw, from when the cage is closed and locked to when the final bell rings it is exactly one minute. In any steel cage match the time starts from when the cage is locked till the last bell, but when Peter goes to colect the 3 grand he was expecting, the broker said he only spent 2 minutes in the ring with Bonesaw. Stupid, but I was bored.

J. Jonah Jameson indicates that someone should contact the patent office so that he can copyright spiderman or green goblin. The patent office registers trademarks, while it is the library of congress that deals with copyrights.

Did anyone else find it odd that Peter's 68 year old uncle is laid off from his job, rather than given early retirement, or regular retirement for that matter, since he is the senior electrician (or whatever)?

In the scene during the festival, while Macy Gray is singing, the Green Goblin makes his first appearance. But it does not show Macy, or the band for that matter, fleeing the stage. You're led to assume that she died...

How do the characters not recognise Spiderman's voice? Peter doesn't change his voice at all when talking to MJ as Spiderman or himself. At one point she talks to him as Peter and as Spiderman within just a few minutes difference and he even says some of the same things to her, yet she does not make the connection between the voice of Peter Parker and Spiderman.

When Peter is learning about his new improved eye-sight, he takes off and puts on his glasses, a few times. When he puts them on, the whole screen gets fuzzy - only what you see through the glasses will be fuzzy, not the area around the glasses too.

In the scene where MJ and Peter are in the hospital and he's telling her what "he told" Spider-Man, if you look at MJ's eyes, you can see they are rapidly moving, like she is reading something.

In the scene on top of the bridge right after the goblin drops Mary Jane and the kids, you can see Spiderman's eyes reflecting them, but if you look at his eyes anywhere else in the movie his eyes don't reflect a thing.

The spider bite gives Peter heightened perception as demontrated in the hallway of the school (after the lunch tray incident). As the bully is about to punch Peter from behind, Peter 'sees' a paper airplane being thrown, a fly and a spitwad all in the split second before he moves to avoid the punch. Later in the final battle between The Goblin and Spiderman, Peter doesn't notice the glider come up behind him until the last moment when he sees Goblin is up to something.

During the scene when the boyfriend arrives to MJ's house with a new car, the vehicle is clearly a Plymouth Prowler, which has a V6 engine... on the sound track, there's an unmistakeable exhaust note of a very throaty V8.

At some times you can see Osborne's teeth and mouth move through his Green Goblin mask. At other times you cannot see his mouth move, just a black darkness. Sometimes when Osborne is not wearing the mask, but a shot of the mask is shown, there is a black fabric behind the mask teeth which would hide the mouth completely. So if this black fabric remains intact (before the mask is nearly destroyed in the final battle) then it would be impossible for anyone to see Osborne's teeth and mouth move when he talks while wearing the mask.

When we see MJ and Peter talking on the street (after she has left the diner), she turns to walk away and you can see that she is wearing 3-4" spike heels. Since when do waitresses wear those?

Thanksgiving at Pete and Harry's: when he comes in the door, Osborne calls May "Aunt May"; she calls him "Mr. Osborne"; at the table a few minutes later, she reprimands "Norman" for picking at the food; when he leaves the apartment in a rush, he thanks "Mrs. Parker".

In the scene where Norman is getting ready to test himself he lays down on the bed fastens himself in and the doctor goes to the computer. However when it shows him being brought in to the chamber he has several electrodes connected to his chest and head. Wow - self attaching electrodes. What will crazy Oscorp think of next?

When Harry is talking to Mary Jane on the phone, she hangs up on him and his cell phone produces a dial tone. Cell phones do not have a dial tone.

In the final cemetery sequence, Peter and MJ square off for a little heart to heart, with MJ touching his face tenderly with her black leather gloves. The camera intercuts between frontal views of both: in hers, her fingers are touching his ear lobe, in his, they are a inch below his ear lobe. In one quick cut of hers, the hand has diappeared completely, then in mid-sentence as they cut back to Peter, it's there again.

When Mary Janee is on the collapsing balcony there's a wide shot where you can see the tether holding the set piece in place.

At Norman Osbourne's funeral, we see Harry from the side saying to Peter that he is like family, but his face doesn't move when he talks.

In the scene of the Youth Festival, Peter Parker looks up from the street to see MJ and Harry Osborne on the balcony. From this point for the next minute or so, all three of these people, especially Parker, appear with their hair parted on one side, then the other, and then back again.

Balcony scene: when the goblin tossed the radiation bomb, wouldn't MJ be affected by it since she was within proximity of the board of directors of Oscorp?

When Peter's blood drops, there is only a little drop that hits the floor, but when the bad guy looks at it, there's a good-sized puddle.

Misconceptions

When the goblin throws those cutting things at spider man he gets cut. When he goes to eat thanksgiving there is a tear on his shirt, but he never wore that shirt so it shouldn't hvae gotten ripped. [There's not a tear, just the blood leaking from the wound.]

We can assume he doesn't disintegrate because of his spider-power, but why do only parts of Parker's costume come off when Norman Osborne throws the Radiation Grenade at him at the end of the movie? If the bomb disintegrates anything organic, as clothing might be, all of Parker's costume should have been destroyed, not just parts of it, and the Grenade was definitely in range, it went off in his face. The Board of Directors all got taken out by one from a few feet away. [It was an explosive bomb, not a radiation grenade. The slow-motion explosion and not the green-ish wave is the difference.)

In the scene where Harry, M.J., and Peter graduate from high school there are Bird of Paradise flowers in the background. These flowers don't grow in Queens, NY. They are there because this scene was most likely shot in Culver City, CA. They do grow on the west coast of America. [Bird of Paradise flowers also grow on the east coast. I am not certain about NY but they do grow on the east coast as one contributor lives in Florida and they grow there.]

When Norman is going into the chamber that makes him the Green Goblin and the metal bars come down that holds him in place he says "that's cold" but in the next shot you can clearly see that the bars are not touching his skin. [It's the metal bed he's lying on that's cold.]

As the balcony at the youth festival falls apart, Harry Osborne is whacked on the left side of his head by falling debris. However, during the scene following this, Harry has a bandage on the RIGHT side of his head. [When Harry gets hit in the head he got hit in the back of the head. What makes him need a bandage is when his head hits the cement floor. That's when the right side of his head gets hurt.]

In the apartment fire scene, Spiderman's suit seems unaffected by the flames and fight. Yet in the final battle with The Goblin, his suit is melted and torn to shreds. [In the final battle, the costume was destroyed because of the bomb blowing up, not the flames. He was not caught in an explosion in the apartment.]

When MJ falls from the building during the parade, Spider-Man goes and rescues her. This should not be possible because according to the laws of gravity, everything falls at the same speed. This being so, Spider-Man should not be able to jump off after MJ falls and still catch her. [Everything only falls at the same speed in a vacuum - in air Spidey would fall faster due to the position he was in.]

When Peter comes out of his house to throw out the trash his house was on the right of MJ's house but when she comes out after a fight it is on the right of Peter's. [These scenes are from 2 different views. When viewed looking away from the street, Peter's house is on the right of MJ's (when throwing away trash). If looking toward the street, MJ's is on the right of Peter's (after the fight).]

The hairs on Spider-Man's hands for wall-climbing are microscopic, so they can stick through his costume. But are we supposed to believe that Spider-Man can climb walls through half-inch-thick shoe soles as he does when he first tries to wall-climb? [Most people seem to think that he's just using the tread on his shoes for grip].

When Peter and MJ are talking in their backyards after she exits crying from a fight, they are talking on opposite sides of the fence. When Flash shows up, he pulls up by Peter's driveway and she walks to the car without ever hopping the fence. [If you pay attention to the right bottom corner of the screen you can see the gate moving back and forth.]

Not a mistake but something interesting. The announcer in the wrestling scene (Bruce Campbell) is wearing a pair of sunglasses. If you look closely, the sunglasses happen to be the exact same pair that Cyclops wears in the X-men movie when he's not wearing the visor. [The glasses the ring announcer wears at the wrestling match aren't the same glasses that Cyclops wore in X-men. While they are both Oakleys, Cyclops wears Juliets with Ruby lenses and the ring announcer wears Romeos with black Iridium lenses (as seen in Mission: Impossible 2).]

Re:Full text from page... [long] (1)

generic-man (33649) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502378)

The logos for Channel 7 in New York (WABC) and Channel 7 in Los Angeles (KABC) are *exactly* the same. I'm not sure about channel 5, though.

Re:Full text from page... [long] (1)

jtrascap (526135) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502392)

> In Jameson's office, during the scene where he first hears about
> Spiderman, he has two T.V.'s behind him...After the amazing Channel
> change you see the channel 7 news (discernible by the small blue 7 in
> the corner), also in L.A.

Not to deny the deftness of the post (it is good, but it requires a SPOILERS line atop) but there is also a Channel 7 with a circular logo in New York. I used to live in that area and when I go to LA, I always confuse the two...

;)

Wish I lived there now! I have no idea when Spiderman opens here in the Netherlands...

The nerd fans always demand justice! (5, Funny)

FearUncertaintyDoubt (578295) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502028)

Even the venerable Itchy and Scratchy had their critical fans. Observe:

Doug: In episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to believe, that this is some sort of a [the three nerds chuckle] magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.
June: Uh, well, uh...
Homer: I'll field that one. Let me ask you a question. Why would a man whose shirt says "Genius at Work" spend all of his time watching a children's cartoon show?
Doug: [embarrassed pause] I withdraw my question. [starts eating a candy bar]

Re:The nerd fans always demand justice! (2, Funny)

YouAreFatMan (470882) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502052)

Oh yes, I remember Simpsons episode 4F12, when Homer becomes Poochie. However, I must lodge an official protest with Fox, because clearly these are the same nerds who got Homer through Nuclear Physics 101 (by hacking the computer, no less, let their geek flags fly). I mean, what are we to believe, that Homer doesn't recognize the people to whom he owes his continued employment at SNPP? Boy, I really hope someone got fired for that blunder.

Internal consistency (1)

ObviousGuy (578567) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502029)

When I go to a fancy restaurant and I am served something that is not right, I return the food to the kitchen and refuse to pay.

I doubt that any of these people who found mistakes left the theater and demanded their money back.

Re:Internal consistency (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502123)


Yeah, I just hate it when my dinner defies the laws of physics, causality, or narrative flow.

Re:Internal consistency (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502141)

And he hates it when the movie he ordered rare comes medium or plotline is drenched in lard.

It's an analogy. Please wrap your head around the concept.

That lighting you saw ... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502032)

... was the blinding flash of the obvious.

'The more geeks see it, the more errors will be reported'. Another master piece of investigative journalism.

Simpson's References, Obligatory (3, Funny)

MrHat (102062) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502035)

For some reason the Simpson's Comic Book Guy always seems to show up here. It's a movie about a man who has turned into a spider. Jumps between buildings, shoots webs, scales walls, supports the DMCA. Why do we care about its "bugs" (snicker) again?

"Alec, Alec, regarding that so called "silent" propulsion system in "The Hunt For Red October", I printed out a list of technical errors which I think you'd enjoy discussing."

"Question: Is your name Ridley Scott or James Cameron?"
"No, it's Homer."
"Well then, I would thank you to stop peering at my screenplay, Homer. And if I see a movie where computers threaten our personal liberties, I will know that you stole my idea."

The biggest mistake of all (1, Offtopic)

Violet Null (452694) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502060)

Is getting your poor website submitted to slashdot. Although the crash and burn effect is kind of pretty...

some of the worst. (4, Informative)

scamcdan (300729) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502061)

this site is full of ridiculous attempts at uncovering something wrong. after realizing that half of the errors were simply stupid, i expected one that the red in his suit was three shades too dark ...

here are some of my favorite "errors":

Why didnt Green Goblin just take off Spiderman's mask when he knocked him out with sleeping gas? Wasn't he interested in knowing who Spiderman really was?

How come you never see Peter's mouth move when he is talking in the Spiderman costume? The mask is spandex just like the rest of the costume, so you would see evidence of Peter's mouth moving when he talks.

During the scene when the boyfriend arrives to MJ's house with a new car, the vehicle is clearly a Plymouth Prowler, which has a V6 engine... on the sound track, there's an unmistakeable exhaust note of a very throaty V8.

kids with too much time on their hands? i think so.

Re:some of the worst. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502095)

During the scene when the boyfriend arrives to MJ's house with a new car, the vehicle is clearly a Plymouth Prowler, which has a V6 engine... on the sound track, there's an unmistakeable exhaust note of a very throaty V8.

Maybe it had a hole in the manifold? Didn't think of that, did they? AHA!

Many on that site are bogus (5, Interesting)

Hitokage_Nishino (182038) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502079)

Some people just don't pay attention or think they see something when they don't. For example, one mistake was listed under LOTR about seeing a car drive by in the scene with Frodo, Sam, and the scarecrow. Maybe I'm blind, but I didn't see any movement at all in the background. Another mistake filed several times was for Harry Potter about a player falling on sand appearing out of nowhere in the Quddich match. Maybe if they had payed attention when the camera showed the entire field they would notice the goals are mounted on sand pits.

Movies do make mistakes, but it seems that the bug watchers also need watchers of their own.

Re:Many on that site are bogus (1)

satanami69 (209636) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502235)

Don't worry, I voted all of the obviously wrong ones down. Boy and it felt great to have that kind of unlimited mod power. AND WHO'S GONNA META-MOD ME. AHAHHAAHAHHA!

The site should be called "web-mistakes.com" (1)

TheBishop (88677) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502083)

Considering that every link pops up one or two ad windows, every page is plastered with ads, the main page seems more of a promo for Symantec, and I really couldn't find much information, I think "web-mistakes.com" would be a better name for them.

The biggest "mistake" (4, Insightful)

artemis67 (93453) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502085)

IMO (and a lot of other people's, too, from what I've read), the biggest mistake was releasing the movie with such shoddy CG work. I mean, there are such glaring problems in there that even non-3D artists like myself are picking up on. Lighting is off, textures are too smooth, physics are way, waaay off, footfalls are off, and the character motion is incredibly un-lifelike. Every time I was ready to really get into the movie, I kept getting snapped back to reality by the poor 3D animation; I think it kept Spider-Man from being a great movie, rather than just a good movie.

I know why it is the way it is, though. The movie's release schedule got bumped up several months because of business decisions about the optimal time to release it. It makes me shudder to think of what might be awaiting us when The Hulk or the Fantastic Four gets made. Are the studios going to bank on the franchise, and to hell with quality?

I wonder how Sam Raimi feels about this? Is he really satisfied with the crappy CG work in Spider-Man? Considering how much money this film is making, it would be really great if, for the DVD version, he re-animated those scenes to make them more believeable. What's his email address? Maybe someone should start a petition...

Re:The biggest "mistake" (5, Interesting)

tolldog (1571) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502120)

I am suprised at the number of "non-industry" people that are complaining about the CG.

I am in the industry.. specificly pure CG, not mixed with live action, so I am used to seeing smooth animation, perfect compositing and what not. I normally pick up on the technical problems with a movies CG.

With Spider-Man ... my brain filtered it all out. I enjoyed the movie so much that I did not notice the technical problems. It has been a while since the last time I could say that. And that goes for co-workers of mine as well. Each of them with different backgrounds from CG studios. Not a complaint about the CG at all.

Maybe its because we know how hard it is that we filter out the tough mistakes. But I think it was the pace and quality of the movie that kept us in and kept us from noticing the glitches.

-Tim

Re:The biggest "mistake" (1)

J23SE (107309) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502284)

I think that 98% of people don't notice the CG at all, either. It's just that 2% of the people whine about it, and then, hordes of others chime in because they want to seem like they know something and can criticize a film. The outcry is just a ripple effect from a minority response to an insignificant part of the film...

Re:The biggest "mistake" (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502342)

I am suprised at the number of "non-industry" people that are complaining about the CG.

This should really tell you about the current state of CG - yea, it's trully amazing what can be done, but it's nowhere near perfection.

Re:The biggest "mistake" (3, Insightful)

eison (56778) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502200)

Um, hate to be the frist to tell you, but it's a COMIC BOOK. Physics are supposed to be off. Lifelike character motion while swinging along a few hundred feet of silk strung between buildings won't make for nearly as interesting a story - it's simply too slow at the beginning and end of the swing. Want a realistic comic book fight? Stick to wrestling, but be prepared that it's a lot slower and less exciting for one guy to beat up 4 others when constrained by physics, and it tends to require rather unbelievable cooperation from the guys getting beat up. The poetic license helps make the story quicker and cooler, the whole thing is more fun because of the impossible animation. And in the end, isn't that the point?

Re:The biggest "mistake" (3, Interesting)

Tantrum420 (312608) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502406)

Um, hate to be the frist to tell you, but it's a COMIC BOOK.

Thank you. I'm getting sick of seeing people bitch about how unrealistic this was or how predictable that was. Come on... That's part of the fun of it. The movie is paying homage to the comic. Y'know, those cheesy pulp stories printed on cheap paper (at least back in the day). We read those things to escape reality, not complain about every little thing that "couldn't possibly happen". Of course it couldn't possibly happen. That's why they're Superheroes (and supervillans). Doesn't the phrase "Suspension of Disbelief" mean anything to you knitpickers? Sheesh.

my $0.05 (keep the change)

T

comic book feel (1)

dollargonzo (519030) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502203)

well, it all depends. the "perfect" flawless cg give the movie a comic-book feel, which is what spiderman is all about anyway. if it were lifelike/realistic, then it would not work as well for the true comic book fans.

QED

Re:comic book feel (1)

Tantrum420 (312608) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502420)

well, it all depends. the "perfect" flawless cg give the movie a comic-book feel, which is what spiderman is all about anyway. if it were lifelike/realistic, then it would not work as well for the true comic book fans.

Exactly. If I wanted that, I'd watch old reruns of The Electric Company on Noggin.

T

Re:The biggest "mistake" (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502692)

yeah, the models in Superman and later Batman looked fake too. The fact is that the production team's vision will always surpass current technology. i totally forgot why I hated /. until I read this post. flame away, because i'll be back never...and for the record, george lucas and art bell both hate open source.

Real Life contains mistakes too! (2, Interesting)

TheMonkeyDepartment (413269) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502108)

Who gives a shit about any of these film mistakes? I don't even expect that much perfection out of real life!

Re:Real Life contains mistakes too! (2, Funny)

PlaysByEar (563310) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502640)

The real life continuity errors are the worst.

Where are my keys? They were here on the table a second ago!

exactly why people hate nerd-types (5, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502109)

Ok, besides the fact that if I see another "Spider Man" story, I'm going to scream...(the hype has, for me, moved it into the same category as Titanic, ie "do not ever bother to see because I'm so sick of hearing about it")

This whole "spot all the mistakes" thing is pretty common among people with no social skills and one of the reasons people hate "nerds".

Case and point was a informational session for a technical school's adult education technology classes(Oracle, C Programming, etc. etc.)

This one guy sitting behind me kept interrupting the guy giving his presentation and:
-correcting him
-disputing points that were(obviously) the presenter's/school's opinion, not statements of fact
-clarifying what he felt were overly general statements made by the presenter

Example(making up everything here):
"...and networking equipment stocks are taking a dive"
(in our pretend example world, networking stocks overall have in fact been declining)

Nerd: "Actually, Cisco systems was up 3/4 this morning."

How many of you reached for the reply button to correct my statement, even though I said "making this up"? Tada, you are one of those ANNOYING NERDS.

After about 5 minutes, I was ready to turn around and bitch-slap him and say "SHUT THE HELL UP!" The presenter was trying -extremely- hard to put up with the guy, who, at what was basically a sales pitch to a dozen or so people, felt it necessary to act like he was engaged in a DISCUSSION with the presenter, who was giving a "why we feel the time is appropriate for you all to take a class with us" PRESENTATION.

This kind of behavior is about as socially clueless as you can get; ignoring the interrupting and the fact that you just don't engage in a debate with someone giving a formal presentation(there's a reason one is called a debate and one is called a presentation)...it's bloody hell annoying when some asshole is sitting there finding fault with your every other word.

Want another example? There's a clip of a Red Dwarf con where some #$@%ing anal nerd fan says "In episode blah blah, where you were running from the Blahs, how was it that you were able to accelerate away on that motorbike when you were holding a gun in your throttle hand?"

Chris Bare(sp?) simply laughed...and never answered the question. The audience thought it was funny...but the guy asked the question dead serious. He was probably wondering why everyone was laughing.

What would be my answer? BECAUSE HES A #$%@ING ACTOR AND HE WAS SITTING ON FAKE BIKE ON A SOUNDSTAGE WITH A BLUESCREEN BEHIND HIM SHOOTING AN IMAGINARY GUN AT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Keep in mind this is a series where, towards the end, people start getting hit on the heads by plastic alligators falling from the sky....and the special effects are REALLY bad on purpose(look on the P2P services for Red Dwarf A to Z; Patrick Steward is featured and talks about this...he almost called his lawyer because he thought it was a Star Trek ripoff, but after about 30 seconds, started laughing and stopped reaching for the phone, and loves the series now.)

Go see the @#$!ing movie and watch it for what it is, a story.

How many kids do you know that sit at bedtime and say "Oh, no daddy, that couldn't be. Bricklayer's unions would never let the pigs build that large a structure without hiring union workers, and the permits from the town take at least 2-3 weeks; besides wolves are pack animals..."

Re:exactly why people hate nerd-types (5, Funny)

ObviousGuy (578567) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502128)

His name is Patrick Stewart. Not Patrick Steward.

Re:exactly why people hate nerd-types (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502231)

> His name is Patrick Stewart. Not Patrick Steward.

Tada! You just proved my point precisely.

Even if I hadn't spelled his name incorrectly on purpose(which I did, as bait), did it occur to you that it might just be a spelling error? What's the point in correcting me? Everyone knew who I meant.

Re:exactly why people hate nerd-types (1)

Trojan (37530) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502707)

This particular correction was obviously made as an illustrative joke.

Re:exactly why people hate nerd-types (5, Interesting)

Discoflamingo13 (90009) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502268)

You are exactly right- I have a short story from college to illustrate. There's a prof at my college that has a reputation for being "that guy you don't want at any of your presentations." One of my friends my first year was the first person ever to do two honors theses- one for mathematics, and one for physics. Friend told me flat out, right before his defense started, "If that bitch even tries to correct my grammar, you can beat him with this newspaper." Ten minutes into friend's honors project, prof had already pointed out two incorrect uses of it's/its, and three spelling mistakes (which were actually British/American usage differences). So the person sitting next to me (an older friend of mine) grabbed the newspaper out of my hands and smacked the prof on the back with it. The prof looked like he was going to cry. He walked out of the room immediately, and the rest of the presentation went off without a hitch.

The next year, the annoying prof (who has a degree in Mathematics) gave a talk about the motion of a "hopping hoop" as this complicated system of parametric equations. About fifteen minutes into his presentation (which was scheduled for 45 minutes), the second reader for my friend's presentation called him out. "Isn't this just rotational mechanics? I mean, you only need one equation for the motion, and you capture all of the effects of friction and momentum in one equation. Who do you think you are - do you think you're going to do better than Newton." Within five minutes, three Math profs had also joined in on the tongue-lashing. He left the talk about twenty minutes before it was supposed to end.

I never actually hit the prof - I was just a first-year, and I didn't want to ruin my relationship with the To this day, my not beating the shit out him with the newspaper remains the only thing I regret about my college experience. So I think there are two morals here: 1) If you can ever get away with beating an idiot with a newspaper, do it; otherwise, you may regret it for the rest of your life; and, 2) If you ever go to a presentation and try to turn it into a witchhunt (gramatical, mathematical, or otherwise), don't be surprised when they're lashing you to the stake and dousing you with gasoline. Or "love thy neighbor in his infinite capacity to mangle language". Or something.

Re:exactly why people hate nerd-types (5, Funny)

foobar104 (206452) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502418)

If you can ever get away with beating an idiot with a newspaper, do it; otherwise, you may regret it for the rest of your life.

Fortune file, here we come.

Re:exactly why people hate nerd-types (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502298)

So what you're saying is that the person who was correcting the sales drone's mistakes and lies shouldn't do that because it isn't polite? So let's let the drone screw over the management types who don't know the real truth because it would be impolite to say anything.

Oh god, why am I feeding the troll??

Re:exactly why people hate nerd-types (2)

foobar104 (206452) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502393)

So what you're saying is that the person who was correcting the sales drone's mistakes and lies shouldn't do that because it isn't polite?

No, he's saying that attempting to make someone or something (say, a movie) sound dumb by pointing out lots of irrelevant errors or seeming errors actually backfires; you end up making yourself sound dumb by revealing the fact that you've completely missed the point.

Oh god, why am I feeding the troll??

Maybe I should ask myself that.

Re:exactly why people hate nerd-types (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502546)

There was a kid like this at my university. I wanted to kill him for being such a pompus fucking dickmagnet.

You're talking about being rude (2, Insightful)

mikosullivan (320993) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502604)

I sympathize with what you're saying, but you're overlooking an important point: the behavior you describe is an imposition on other people's time and patience. The site described above is for people who want to discuss nitpicks in their own forum. Nobody has to go to the site and read the material.

The idea that discussing the details of a work of art remind me of people who like to ruin a perfectly good literary discussion by whining "you're analyzing it to death". If you don't want to participate, nobody's making you do so.

FWIW, nitpicking is a time-honored tradition inthe sci-fi community. Such luminaries as Isaac Asimov used to participate as a young kid in writing in nitpicks to Astounding Science Fiction. It's fun, and when it's not a rude imposition, it's a harmless activity.

site down, mirror up (5, Informative)

krs-one (470715) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502146)

Looks like the site is already down.

Mirror at http://openglforums.com/spider/index.html [openglforums.com]

I even took the pop-ups off for you guys, aren't I nice? ;)

-Vic

All I know... (1)

craw (6958) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502172)

is that "Space Jam" had Bugs.

Don't these people have a life? (4, Interesting)

alen (225700) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502175)

What's wrong with going to a movie and simply enjoy it? You either like it or not. Who cares if the CG work is not up to someone's standards or there is a costume error. I have better things to do with my time than watch a movie numerous times to look for all mistakes. Who cares if you didn't hear a footfall when spiderman landed. Do you also complain about all the noise spaceships make in scifi movies?

Don't you have a life? (2, Insightful)

mikosullivan (320993) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502630)

What's wrong with going to a movie and simply enjoy it?

What's wrong with having fun talking about the details of a movie? Do people always have to complain about how other people have harmless fun?

Cell phones don't have a dial tone (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502188)

Note this comment

When Harry is talking to Mary Jane on the phone, she hangs up on him and his cell phone produces a dial tone. Cell phones do not have a dial tone.

It couldn't have been a land-line either, as the phone system in the US won't give you a dial tone if the other party hangs up.

Once upon a time some phone switches would do that, however people discovered that you could make a call from a pay phone, wait for the other party to hang up, then make another call without inserting any more money. Subsequently, the ability to get a dial tone without putting the phone on-hook was eliminated from all new phone switches in the US.

Obviously whoever wrote that scene hasn't used a phone for about ten years. Or maybe just never got hung up on. :)

Re:Cell phones don't have a dial tone (2)

CamelTrader (311519) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502425)

My first thought when I saw this scene was If we can hear the dial tone, why couldn't we hear mary jane talking?

Re:Cell phones don't have a dial tone (5, Insightful)

foobar104 (206452) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502498)

It couldn't have been a land-line either, as the phone system in the US won't give you a dial tone if the other party hangs up. [...] Obviously whoever wrote that scene hasn't used a phone for about ten years. Or maybe just never got hung up on.

Friend, this is not a new observation. There are certain conceits that we use in making movies and TV shows that are not realistic in the strictest sense. We use them because they make for a better movie, or because the audience is used to seeing or hearing them.

For example, find any movie from the past forty years or so that features a scene of two people driving as seen from the hood of the car. Chances are good that the car has no rear-view mirror. In some instances, you can even see the spot on the windshield where the mirror used to be mounted. Chances are also pretty good that you never noticed. That's because some directors feel-- rightly or wrongly-- that the presence of the mirror right in the middle of the screen, between the two characters, is distracting or unappealing to the audience. So it goes. This is not an error. It's a very deliberate choice to deviate from strict realism in an effort to more effectively tell the story.

Same basic thing with the dial tone anomaly you mentioned. In movies, when the character on the other end hangs up, you hear a dial tone immediately. Not because that's what you would hear in real life, but because the movie or TV show works better that way. It's kind of like a little clue to the audience: hey, so-n-so just hung up. You, sitting in the theater, get the point immediately, and the story moves on.

That's the thing with movies and such. If it advances the story, it's okay. Movies exist to entertain, and they don't lose points for inaccuracy.

So basically what are commonly referred to as movie mistakes break down into three broad categories: plot holes, continuity errors, and deliberate decisions to differ from the strictly realistic.

You don't get any geek points for finding moments in movies where the director-- or sound man, or whatever-- deliberately chose to break with reality. That's part of what making movies is all about.

Nobody cares about continuity, either; hell, Kubrick even used continuity breaks as a stylistic conceit. Remember the rape scene in A Clockwork Orange? There are continuity breaks all through that scene; they were deliberate, intended to make the scene more frenetic and disorienting to the audience. More recently, Spielberg did the same thing in a couple of scenes in Schindler's List. But in general, if you go looking for accidental continuity breaks, you will find them. There's nothing exciting or cool about them.

As for plot holes, we can talk about those if you want. Sometimes people cite plot holes that aren't holes at all, like the fact that nobody guesses that Clark Kent is Superman despite the fact that they look exactly alike. That's not a plot hole, it's a plot feature. Other plot holes arise as a result of the movie-making process: the fifth replicant in Blade Runner that later got ret-conned into being Deckard himself. Other plot holes are legitimate, but they ultimately are like that one loose thread on your sweater. You could pull it, but the whole sleeve may unravel. So you just leave it alone, and keep on wearing your warm, comfy sweater.

"Movie mistakes" are, in my opinion, just not all that interesting.

Re:Cell phones don't have a dial tone (1)

PlanetJIM (212710) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502658)

This is a point where I think what we call a bug is really a feature.

How else is the director going to convey to the audience the fact that the party on the other side of the line has abruptly ended the call? A click might be too subtle and silence doesn't do anything to tell us MJ hung up.

I think this is something that's just become kind of a narrative convention for movie phone conversations that allows the director to show us what's going on without giving us the cheesy split screen. I mean, if he was talking on the cell phone we wouldn't be able to hear MJ's voice either, but we can.

Remember... they're telling a story. Sometimes you need to make changes in technology to make the story go smoothly.

correlation (2)

smoondog (85133) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502210)

I bet there is a correlation with the number of mistakes and the geekiness of that movie. Comic Book Guy types tend to report more errors and they certainly aren't going to report them for sense and sensability ...

-Sean

Forget about Spider-man, (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502222)

Digimon is where it's at!

Let's here it for Gallantmon!!

Movie Mistakes (1)

whereiswaldo (459052) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502256)

The site I've visited in the past is:

http://www.nitpickers.com

Another bug (0, Offtopic)

NickRob (575331) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502304)

In the parade scene, Peter spots MJ and Harry on the balcony and Harry sees Peter on the ground. Yet, when MJ is falling from the balcony after it crumbles, the distance to the ground is much farther than a few storeys.

The plural usage is "Stories"

Re:Another bug (3, Funny)

foobar104 (206452) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502508)

The plural usage is "Stories"

At least look it up first. "Storey" is a fairly common, albeit somewhat old-fashioned, spelling for the word that means a level of a building. This is as distinct from "story," meaning a tale. "Storeys" is an accepted word, found almost exclusively in the UK, for what us Americans would most likely call "floors."

The worst kind of nitpicker is a mistaken nitpicker.

The movie with the most bugs... (3, Funny)

Deagol (323173) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502312)

Starship Troopers. ;)

Re:The movie with the most bugs... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3502317)

Arachnophobia.

Audio "bugs " (1)

xipho (193257) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502338)

Spiders aren't bugs. In the movie they actually get the order name right..."aranae", but the family names are all screwed up, can't remember off the top of my head what they were but jumping spiders are "Salticidae", not whatever they said. The other two names (trap door and something else) were way off too if I remember right...

Norton (2)

xrayspx (13127) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502362)

Does having Jim Norton [eatabullet.com] in the movie count as a 'bug'?

c'mon already (1)

eRhino (578957) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502375)

well not to bust on Ando, but you gotta admit, theres a LOT of people out there with WAAAY too much time on there hands! i mean im not gonna spoil AOTC by looking for CG errors of when Anakin has his ring on the worng finger! c'mon people...like the theatre always says--"Enjoy you film!" i mean stop thinking...sheesh.. --that concludes my vent--

Applicable: Shatner's Famous SNL Get A Life Speech (5, Funny)

Figz (217203) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502607)

William Shatner: You know, before I answer any more questions there's something I wanted to say. Having received all your letters over the years, and I've spoken to many of you, and some of you have traveled... y'know... hundreds of miles to be here, I'd just like to say... GET A LIFE, will you people? I mean, for crying out loud, it's just a TV show! I mean, look at you, look at the way you're dressed! You've turned an enjoyable little job, that I did as a lark for a few years, into a COLOSSAL WASTE OF TIME!

[ a crowd of shocked and dismayed Trekkies.... ]

I mean, how old are you people? What have you done with yourselves?

[ to "Ears" ] You, you must be almost 30... have you ever kissed a girl?

[ "Ears" hangs his head ]

I didn't think so! There's a whole world out there! When I was your age, I didn't watch television! I LIVED! So... move out of your parent's basements! And get your own apartments and GROW THE HELL UP! I mean, it's just a TV show dammit, IT'S JUST A TV SHOW!

Charlie: Are- are you saying then that we should pay more attention to the movies?

William Shatner: NO!!! THAT'S NOT WHAT I'M SAYING AT ALL!!! HEY, YOU GUYS ARE... THE LAMEST BUNCH... I'VE NEVER SEEN... [ walks away from podium ] I can't believe these people... I mean, I really can't understand what's....

But... but.... (2, Funny)

LittleGuy (267282) | more than 12 years ago | (#3502639)

I thought Spider-man would enjoy a lot of bugs...
Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?