Beta

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

cancel ×

435 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Just hands? (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400375)

Is this limited to just hands? Redundant gene transfer ...

I can just see the first court case... (5, Funny)

Bimkins (242641) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400376)

"Honest, your honor. I wasn't grabbing her. I was just giving her my telephone number!"

Re:I can just see the first court case... (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400408)

The penetration which followed was simply an attempt to get a better upload.

Re:I can just see the first court case... (1)

benna (614220) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400583)

What has the world come to.

Amazing! (4, Funny)

ActiveSX (301342) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400377)

And if we could get a long chain of people, maybe we could use them instead of ethernet cable!

Re:Amazing! (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400498)

and use those flying XP users as wireless links to places?

Re:Amazing! (5, Funny)

blowhole (155935) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400558)

Imagine a Beowulf cluster of us!

We're better than mud! (5, Funny)

jimson (516491) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400378)

At least in transfer rates........

Any Body Parts? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400381)

Would it work with any body parts at all?

Re:Any Body Parts? (1)

wo1verin3 (473094) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400492)

Baby.. wanna have sex and while we're at it can I download your girls gone wild movies?

Wow (5, Funny)

Henry V .009 (518000) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400382)

which uses the body's conductivity to transmit data at an amazing 10 megabits per second

Oh, god. Imagine the new possibilities for porn.

Re:Wow (4, Funny)

Jucius Maximus (229128) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400409)

pr0n?

This brings new meaning to peer-to-peer networking in general!

Couldn't resist... (5, Funny)

bjschrock (557973) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400385)

So, if a bunch of people join hands, do they become a Beowolf cluster?

Re:Couldn't resist... (-1, Flamebait)

REDNOROCK (597025) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400411)

No, they don't have processesors dummy, people have been subverted to usb cords.

Re:Couldn't resist... (0, Offtopic)

LowAmmoWarning (539099) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400421)

What OS are YOU running?

Re:Couldn't resist... (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400471)

A Conversation with Human Resources

Human Resources Representative: Good afternoon, Stuart.

Stuart: Hi.

HR: As you may have heard, we have been conducting interviews with certain personnel lately. In the current economic climate, our company is looking to reduce costs wherever possible. This may also, unfortunately, include "right-sizing" in certain departments head counts. In order to be absolutely fair, we are giving the persons whose positions are being considered for right-sizing the opportunity to justify their current positions worth. Do you understand?

Stuart: You're going to fire me?

HR:No, Stuart. "Right-sizing" is not about firing people. Based on your answers to a few questions, your departments head count will be evaluated. This may include shifting of positions and responsibilities, adjustments to salaries, and in some cases individuals may be released from employment. Does this help you understand?

Stuart: I guess so...

HR: Alright, lets begin. According to our files, your present position is Unix Systems Administrator, is that correct?

Stuart: Uhh, yeah.

HR: And what responsibilities, in your view, does your position entail?

Stuart: I administer to the Unix systems, which includes 4 GNU/Linux Samba servers, 8 load-balanced GNU/Linux Apache web servers, and a FreeBSD firewall... Hey, if you're looking to fi.. err, "right-size" somebody, why don't you look at the two NT admin guys? After all, they have much less experience than me; they're just a bunch of paper MCSEs, which just means you memorized a bunch of stuff and passed a test. They don't have any real admin experience, like with a GNU/Linux system.

HR: We'll get to that in just a moment. In what ways would you say your expertise is vital to the continued operation of these servers?

Stuart: Well, I know just about everything there is to know about GNU/Linux and the associated GNU operating system utilities.

HR: Mmmhmmm. In this email from the director of IS, he tells me that the company is considering the elimination of Linux from the environment in order to lower our TCO -- total cost of operation, I think? No, total cost of ownership. He says we are considering replacing these servers with Windows 2000 Advanced Server, running IIS 5. What do you think about this?

Stuart: That's a stupid idea. Winbl... err, Windows is extremely difficult to administer. You have to keep up with new security patches coming out every 2 hours, and on top of all that you have to deal with the Blue Screen of Death every day, and Microsoft charges you like 500 bucks every time you call them.

HR: So Windows is much harder to administer than Linux?

Stuart: That's right. As a matter of fact, if you just got rid of the Microsl... err, Microsoft boxen, you could replace them with GNU/Linux and save some money on the licenses right there.

HR: Explain this to me. If Windows is so difficult to administer, why are the NT administrators able to support twice as many servers, given their limited "real world" experience, and the fact that they are only "paper MCSEs"?

Stuart: Err, they're probably just not doing their job. After all, my FreeBSD box has a 279 day uptime. Their Microsh... err, Microsoft boxen are up and down every week because of security patches.

HR: Yes, the FreeBSD firewall is an interesting topic. We had an outside security consultant come in, and he found that the FreeBSD firewall had not been patched for a vulnerability in a program called "Open SSH". The NT servers were up-to-date on patches, and properly secured. In addition, a large proportion of helpdesk tickets are called in because of issues with the Samba file servers. How do you respond to this?

Stuart: What? Gaah, the OpenSSH exploit was only a local root exploit!! There's no reason to take down a server with almost 300 days uptime to patch it!! And those people just have problems because they are running Windows 2000 on their PCs!! Microsoft deliberately changed the SMB standard to cripple open source competitors!! If the users weren't so obsessed with using their Outlook calendars and their Powerpoint presentations, they could just use Mandrake or something with StarOffice, and everything would be fine!!

HR: There's no reason to get excited, Stuart. These are just questions we have to ask. Now, given that you say Linux is far easier to administer than Windows, is there any reason to believe that if we bring on another NT administrator, he or she would be unable to support the Linux and BSD systems until they get migrated to Windows 2000?

Stuart: No... err, YES. It is easier, but... they just wouldn't understand!! There is a lot you have to know!! It's not just all point and click and all that kiddie stuff!!! It's really hard, you have to be able to compile kernels and edit conf files!! They couldn't do what I do!!!

HR: OK, Stuart, I can understand your anxiety. We'll move away from that subject. Now, is there any possibility that you see for us to use your skills in another position? For instance, would you be interested in earning your MCSE to become a junior administrator when we roll out the new Windows 2000 servers?

Stuart: NO!! I DON'T USE THAT MICROTRASH!! IT'S NOT LIKE I'M INTERESTED IN GETTING A BLUE SCREEN OF DEATH EVERY 2 SECONDS AND SPENDING THE REST OF THE TIME LISTENING TO STUPID USERS ASKING IDIOT QUESTIONS. OPEN SOURCE DOES EVERYTHING I NEED IT TO.

HR: Well, that tells us just about everything we need to know. Stuart, your input is of course appreciated, and we will be taking all your comments under advisement. Your department head will be contacting you soon to let you know about any change in your employment status. Thank you for your time.

Stuart: BYE. <slams door>

Napster This! (3, Funny)

spellcheckur (253528) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400387)

...and you'll now be able to download ripped DVDs during fornication!

Oh, wait... hmmm... I wonder which I'll need first... a DVD player, or a girlfriend.

New cabling standards... (4, Funny)

Cadre (11051) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400426)

download ripped DVDs during fornication

Cat5, Cat5e, Cat6, CatSex...

Re:New cabling standards... (0, Offtopic)

leviramsey (248057) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400434)

Cat5, Cat5e, Cat6, CatSex...

What about SexKitten?

Re:New cabling standards... (4, Funny)

Edgewize (262271) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400597)

Cat5, Cat5e, Cat6, CatSex...

Jees, that's starting to look like my incomming Gnutella queries.

*grits-teeth-in-rage* (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400388)

2002-10-07 01:14:50 Download Porn Videos While You Kiss (articles,news) (rejected)

Re:*grits-teeth-in-rage* (5, Funny)

foobar104 (206452) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400577)

2002-10-07 01:14:50 Download Porn Videos While You Kiss (articles,news) (rejected)

Perhaps now you're starting to understand the importance of a good title.

How about people with pace makers? (5, Interesting)

LowAmmoWarning (539099) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400389)

How about the people with pace makers? Are they going to have a warning label on the product or even try testing the product with them? Also, how about any other medical conditions that might present themselves due to this technology?

Re:How about people with pace makers? (4, Informative)

mclearn (86140) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400575)

The article states that the device uses the body's natural conductivity. Hence, there should be no issues regarding those with pace-makers.

Re:How about people with pace makers? (5, Informative)

LinuxInDallas (73952) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400625)

Pacemakers and other implantables typically communicate with external devices using low power RF signals. It's quite possible that this networking could interfere with operation of the device. There are rumors of airport security x-ray machines causing havoc in some types of devices. It's the responsibility of the medical device manufacturer to make sure an implant meets certain criteria for EMI/RFI but those requirements are not all that strenuous to meet.

Exchange Email? (2, Funny)

Trogre (513942) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400395)

Is it just me, or do seeing the words Exchange and Email in the same sentence make you shiver?

I was expecting another word like 'virus' or 'vulnerability' in that sentence.

So how does it hook up? (1)

Audity (600754) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400405)

Sounds neat, but i dont think I want wiring clamp pinching my ass everywhere I go.

Isn't that an old song? (0)

jerkychew (80913) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400410)

"People... people who zap people..."

Two for the price of one... (5, Funny)

jjh37997 (456473) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400413)

Now you can transfer computer viruses as easy as the old fashioned biological kind.

I can see the T-Shirts now, "Don't touch me! I'm infected with Code Red!"

10 mbps? Yeah sure... (1)

boa13 (548222) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400414)

Just like my 11 mbps wireless connection I guess. Right now, I've got a "Very Good" connection quality, and I rarely go above 2 mbps.

We'll have to wait the first tests by independant people to see how these 10 mbps live up in real-life reality.

Here's what I don't get... (5, Interesting)

BTWR (540147) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400416)

If you're close enough to TOUCH the person... why not just give a business card or TALK to the person???

Re:Here's what I don't get... (1, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400452)

The guy in the old Micro Machines commercials speaks pretty fast, but I don't think he can speak anywhere close to 10Mbps.

Say you're at a conference. You meet 30 people. Do you want 30 business cards that you'll have to scan into your addrbook later or would you rather just greet people saying "Hi" while shaking hands (hearing a beep from your PDA telling you that it downloaded their contact info).

Re:Here's what I don't get... (2)

foobar104 (206452) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400588)

The guy in the old Micro Machines commercials

You mean the guy from the old Federal Express commercials? You youngsters, I swear....

Re:Here's what I don't get... (2, Interesting)

BTWR (540147) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400619)

SO then why not just use the PDA's infrared beam?

Ok... so you go up to a complete stranger at a convention. Instead of a quick paper card or a beam from a pda, you have to hold the strangers hand, then with the other hand, press SEND, then wait maybe 10 VERY AWKWARD seconds while holding this man/woman's hand. Only if she were sexy would this be anything but really weird...

Re:Here's what I don't get... (2, Interesting)

LowAmmoWarning (539099) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400457)

How about you use it for electonic business cards. People tend to lose real business cards and an electronic business card would cut down on cost. What if by bumping into somebody you gave them your business card? Or how about even using it as a personal identification system in which when you go to your company it verifies its informatoin w/ the information that you are carying w/ you. I'm sure a security card such as this transmitted by just touch could become useful in numerous applications...

... and while you're at it (1)

timothy (36799) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400486)

why not surgically attach yourself to them as well? Since you'll be close enough, if you can get your companion to drop his / her guard just briefly, you can assure his or her permanent attention to anything you might have to say with a quick application of superglue and instant sutures.

Haven't you ever wanted to exchange information (like telephone numbers, email address, etc) with someone for future reference? :)

This just skips a few awkward moments.

What it seems most like to me is the current (and quite cool) ability for Palm OS devices to beam information to each other -- faster, more accurate and less subject to loss than scribbling numbers on napkins.

timothy

bazzzzzzzzztttt (0, Redundant)

digitalsushi (137809) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400439)

Whuh? Palm.BugBear?! Did you wash your hands?!

hehe, nippon (1, Funny)

Dankling (596769) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400440)

Nippon.. Nippoff... nippon.. nippoff...

Interesting, but... (5, Insightful)

rice_burners_suck (243660) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400442)

This looks like an interesting technology, but what about the security implications? Suppose in ten years, everybody carries around a tiny device--the futuristic counterpart to today's cellphones--which acts as a phone, voice recorder/MP3 player, PDA, digital still/video camera, electronic wallet, and even contains the digital keys to your house, car, and whatever. All you have to do is touch the doorknob to your house and it'll read the keys from your device and unlock automatically.

Now ask yourself this: What's to stop crackers from using a root-kit that operates through handshakes to steal information from your electronic device and then use that information to break into your stuff? Is this another one of those technologies that will become totally critical in our everyday lives, and that will also become a huge security problem?

Re:Interesting, but... (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400540)

Make sure you shake hands with your vendor regularly to get the latest fixes/patches for your device.

Seen this...? (5, Interesting)

ImaLamer (260199) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400445)

I've seen this sort of thing thing demonstrated years ago on TLC or the Discovery Channel.

The exception was that it was planned to be a device placed in the shoe which would store the information, like a business card's worth of info.

Really, I can't think of a better way of transmitting your public key to someone. Have a sit down with the boss of the family and shake hands. Write your messages on your PDA and send them to the person through IR or with another touch.

Imagine the human-to-human e-mail system or TCP/IP over Homo Sapiens Sapiens; HSS for short. Write an e-mail with a public key attached and it travels from person to person via handshake until it reaches the person who's key is the same and they in turn could decode the message with their secret key.

Damn... maybe I should patent my system.

Re:Seen this...? (1, Interesting)

dead sun (104217) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400490)

Hrm, sounds a bit like RFC 1149 [ietf.org] , or TCP/IP via Avian Carriers. Sounds slower than molasses, but would be interesting to see how many jumps one message could make and still be delivered.

God, the latencies on such a network would be hideous.

X degrees of separation. (4, Interesting)

mclearn (86140) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400513)

In a similar vein, it could be used to determine how interconnected people are -- sort of like that degrees of separation email experiment being conducted at Columbia University (Smallworld) [columbia.edu] .

Re:Seen this...? (0, Redundant)

inerte (452992) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400543)

And lan parties would be like group sex...

Two Words (0)

SexyKellyOsbourne (606860) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400450)

Snake Oil

Re:Two Words (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400612)

Huehuahuheuhauhe. I would burn mod points if I had :)

So if the DNA is 760 MB (5, Funny)

PissingInTheWind (573929) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400453)

at 10Mb/s our body could transmit it's own DNA in 1 hour and 41 minutes.

9 months is a long time compared to that...

Re:So if the DNA is 760 MB (0)

panxerox (575545) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400497)

So what my body can transmit its genetic code in under 3 minutes :)

Re:So if the DNA is 760 MB (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400609)

"Never underestimate the bandwidth of a healthy ejaculate"

Re:So if the DNA is 760 MB (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400503)

dont ya mean ~12min

Re:So if the DNA is 760 MB (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400523)

megabits/megabytes, ya fucken dildo.

Re:So if the DNA is 760 MB (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400581)

Uh no... 10Mbps is ~1.25MB/sec
do the math, @ 1.25MB/sec 760MB will transfer in ~10.13min

Re:So if the DNA is 760 MB (5, Funny)

afidel (530433) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400510)

Well the actual transmition can be acomplished in as few as 5 seconds, emm errr or so I'm told.

Re:So if the DNA is 760 MB (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400595)

Don't worry. Nobody actually thinks that you have ever had sex anyway. You do read /. after all.

Re:So if the DNA is 760 MB (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400512)

"at 10Mb/s our body could transmit it's own DNA in 1 hour and 41 minutes. 9 months is a long time compared to that..."

So they just need to invent a machine that can manufacture babies?

The women would probably like that, but for the men: then what about sex?

1 hour 41 minutes!? (1)

I didn't (569512) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400520)

My DNA transmission can only last for several seconds...

Re:So if the DNA is 760 MB (1)

inerte (452992) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400531)

Actually it's been done, averages about 7 minutes, and it's called sex.

Re:So if the DNA is 760 MB (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400566)

Actually it's been done, averages about 7 minutes, and it's called sex.

Hey, this is /.

You can't expect people here to be experts on that.

In Related News... (1)

leviramsey (248057) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400454)

...backbone providers have announced plans to pay people minimum wage to hold hands with each other as a backup backbone.

Re:In Related News... (3, Funny)

foobar104 (206452) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400604)

...backbone providers have announced plans to pay people minimum wage to hold hands with each other as a backup backbone.

Sigh. The way the job markets looks right about now, I would take that job.

A thought... (2, Insightful)

Derg (557233) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400460)

To quote the Article:
It could also get a computer to start up with the proper settings as soon as the user sat down, the paper said.

I think this would be a benefit for both computer security and for true multi-user desktop environments, as well as network access.. Instead of a password, you need the hardware device to access a specific account. then again, it is just one more device to lose/break/power/carry.

Just a thought..

Conductivity issues (0, Offtopic)

Dankling (596769) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400463)

i highly doubt the human wang can be as conductive has gold

This is new? (1)

Arcaeris (311424) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400465)

According to an earlier post today, the sequence of my DNA is something like 715 MB.

Using my body "conductivity", I can transfer my DNA to a person in, 3-4 seconds? That's like 238 MB/sec. The whole uplink/"stream" process can take as little as 30 seconds to 1 minute. That's still a minimum of about 12 MB/second for the entire "load."

Some news.

We should use this for the last mile. (2, Interesting)

Hershmire (41460) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400466)

It gives a whole new meaning to "hands around the world". Now where to find volunteers...

Intercourse tops this a little.. (1)

stardazed0 (558289) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400472)

As far as I know, semen is probably a lot quicker than this -- gigabits per second -- but of course, if you average this over time from motivation for data exchange to time of exchange, most guys on here would be better off with mud..

But only ONE packet ever gets through! (0)

way2trivial (601132) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400544)

And even that one rarely does..

Re:Intercourse tops this a little.. (2)

foobar104 (206452) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400617)

Don't forget that your sperm only hold half of your genes. You're overestimating the number of bytes transmitted a bit there.

It's kind of like the old saying that I'm too lazy to look up right now. "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes tooling down the expressway."

Shades of "The Belonging Kind" (2, Interesting)

Perianwyr Stormcrow (157913) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400473)

Dark club, a whisper in your ear.

"I know what you like".

A fleeting touch verifies it- she sure does.

So, she settles down next to you, and rests her hand on your leg. It can't be the data-transmission that's making you shiver, you've done this before.

A few breathless minutes later, she smiles, and kisses you lightly on the forehead.

"Keep the faith."

You know you will. After all, a quick glance at your PDA shows that you've benefitted twice tonight.

Re:Shades of "The Belonging Kind" (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400501)

I thought in "The Belonging Kind" they had sex by touching their thighs together or some shit like that.

Re:Shades of "The Belonging Kind" (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400534)

Hadn't thought of that twist.

Haven't seen a copy of "Burning Chrome" in years. Might have to dig up a copy. That was, IMHO, Gibson's best work.

Re:Shades of "The Belonging Kind" (2)

foobar104 (206452) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400633)

"The Gernsback Continuum" is his best short story; that is, it's my favorite of his short stories. It's also included in Burning Chrome, I think. Worth a read.

Meeting Spammers (0)

rajinikanth (235707) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400477)

No wonder all sorts of people want to shake my hands at the mall :)
1500 Handshaken mail addresses available for $9.99.

10mbps For The Healthy (5, Funny)

spudwiser (124577) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400478)

Yes, but in order to reach full 10mbps you have to have a diet rich in copper.

Security? (1)

LowAmmoWarning (539099) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400479)

So what happens when a person gets DoS attacks? Or infected with a virus? Can we just unplug you? Or turn you off?

Re:Security? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400559)

When's the last time you saw a piece of wire get infected with a wire?

Code Red hit so hard we had to reboot all the CAT 5 cables!

Re:Security? (1)

inerte (452992) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400603)

So what happens when a person gets DoS attacks?

1: Slap!
2: I am calling the DMCA!

Virus (1)

Jonboy X (319895) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400480)

Gives new meaning to that old story about virii(or is it viruses?) being spread when people shake hands...

In other news.... (4, Funny)

Bobulusman (467474) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400483)

The DMCA has announced that skin is now illegal.

Great, yet another phobia! (1)

dan.hunt (613949) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400484)

So those people who have issues with germs will not want to shake hands for risk of contracting a virus, worm or other PDA nasty. So does this mean Norton antivirus will team up Proctor and Gamble to make Zest antivirus?

stuff (3, Funny)

Raven42rac (448205) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400487)

damnit, thats no ethernet cable, why, its people, NTT is people I tell you, people!

Humans = CAT3? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400500)

So for 10Mbps ethernet, we need 4 wires and they have to be twisted at 3 twists per foot. But the human body is just as good... I'm not buying it.

Re:Humans = CAT3? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400565)

It has to be true, how much does 6 ft of cat3 cost, and how much does 6ft of human cost?
most expensive has to be the best

Brings a whole new meaning to two little words (0)

way2trivial (601132) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400522)

Personal Firewall.

Greetings (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400542)

Your unique conductivity will be added to our own.
You will be assimilated.
Resistance is futile....

Somehow I envision all my personal data being extracted somehow when I step onto a sewer grate.
Or a nimda virus that uses my unwitting conductivity ports for DDOS attacks against others outside my collective.

My dying wish will be to link up with 7 of 9, who is really about 9 of 10 anyway.

Some things to resolve, but amazing potential (5, Insightful)

starseeker (141897) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400545)

Problems: Stores might rig their doornobs to download your personal information as you go in the store. Privacy issue. Or someone could touch you, and have all your information stored. Think potential stalkers/criminals/etc. Scary. Of course you could always turn it off, I suppose, but if you forget it's a problem. I assume I'm not the only absent minded human around.

However, there are some interesting possibilities:

A credit card reader could read your body's electrical signal, as it is also scanning the card. Added consumer security. Even cooler would be if each person had a unique electrical signal their body generates, but I don't know anything about that. Either way, interesting.

You could make long distance calls from anywhere, and have the phone read your calling card number automatically when you pick up the phone.

Possibility of electronic "keys" for car/house stored in PDA. Not so good if PDA is lost or crashes, but if you can call the company and say "My PDA is gone - please scramble my house key codes until we can resolve the issue" it might work. Locking the house would be great - simply disable the electronic circuit from the inside and there is no lock to pick. As for someone who tries to crack it while you're out, simply have the system stop taking input for five seconds if it gets a bad signal. With billions of possibilities at five seconds a try, it wouldn't work real well trying to crack it. If you're paranoid, have it take thirty seconds. No more fumbling with keys or those little remote control keychains, either - just touch and open.

Many issues to resolve, but some very cool possibilities as well.

Now Just Wait a Second (5, Insightful)

serutan (259622) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400549)

Does anybody else think this sounds just a teensy bit flaky? The article says the connection works through clothing ... "Apparel and handbags have their own conductivity, allowing an electrical connection to a PDA that can remain in one's pocket..." Huh?? 10 mbps using the cloth of my pocket as a conductor??

I have a suspicion that news.au.com is getting one slipped to them. The closest Google result I could get with "NTT NoCoMo skin" is this article [computingsa.co.za] about a cell phone that conducts sound through bone and cartilage, enabling you to listen to the call by sticking your finger in your ear.

Uhhh, okie dokie.

Re:Now Just Wait a Second (3, Insightful)

blakestah (91866) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400602)

Does anybody else think this sounds just a teensy bit flaky?

Absolutely.

Although, I am telling you right now, if we greased our palms with conducting paste, and gripped REALLY hard, we could get down to 100 kOhms in conductance. Then we deal with noise. Now, most of the connecting tissue is stricly low-pass (which is a bitch for high bandwidth issues), and noise is in the millivolts range. To add insult to injury, most of the signal loss will occur in the skin itself, so this application is a really tough one. I think in the lab you could probably rig it to transmit the amount of info in a business card, maybe.

OTOH, detecting a handshake and using that to trigger an IR linkup seems fairly easy.

Oh great (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400554)

Congratulations people, you have been reduced to a wire. And a crappy wire at that.

Oh, but to have this on a college exam.... (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400564)

Where you can get charged with academic dishonesty not for looking over at someone elses' test or passing a cheat sheet, but for just givin 'em a high five. That's neat.

I guess... but can I run Kazaa on it? (1)

Q3vi1 (611292) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400571)

That could be concidered a very effecient Peer-to-Peer relationship, however, I'm still waiting until I can get 802.11a wired directly into my brain. The idea of it is simply a little disturbing for me, especially when dealing with power regulation. I wouldn't want a simple thing like a business card exchange to become a 'shocking' experience.

College budget (1)

incom (570967) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400572)

Now having an overcrowded dormroom can be a plus, you can save the cost of networking cable.

Great for trade shows (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4400582)

This was demonstrated at a trade show that I was at a few years back. The idea was that you could shake hands or touch a button and have info d/l straight to your PDA. Having worked a Comdex or 2. this sounds like a great way to gather a ton of info withour breaking your back before the weeks over.

Exchange Emails (1)

uberstool (470348) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400593)

A handshake is about all it takes to get emails from Exchange

How Legit is This...? (1)

Lord of the Fries (132154) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400594)

I haven't even read the article, probably wont. Isn't every couple of months there's some startup scam promising some massive jump and paradigm shift in bandwidth? Aren't we about due another one?

Communicable Viruses? (1)

havardi (122062) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400607)

New reason to wash your hands after pissing. Your PDA may pick up viruses left in the static charge of bathroom doorhandles, etc. For serious.

From Japan? (2, Interesting)

zwoelfk (586211) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400608)

Doesn't anyone else find it odd that this was developed in Japan of all places? Living there, I don't know when the last time I shook hands with someone was. At least this could be handy for exchanging information with women... because I don't when when the last time I had (physical) contact with a man.

Metal Gear Solid predicted it... (1)

RyuuzakiTetsuya (195424) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400618)

... and it happend. Granted I probably shouldn't give Hideo Kojima credit, but DAMN. Where's my Guided missles dammit?!

(The device in question was a key card that identified you just by touching a door through the process listed above.)

But a paradox... (2)

moosesocks (264553) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400623)

If I were to record a digital sample of my voice at 10MBps, wouldn't I be transferring data at 10MBps by using my body?

big deal... (1)

JoeBlows (581471) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400627)

people have been doing this since E-mail became an esential business tool.......

it is called the business card.

Typhoid Melissa? (2)

YrWrstNtmr (564987) | more than 11 years ago | (#4400631)

New way to transfer a virus?

Not only a bio-bug, but also e-bugs.
Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?
or Connect with...

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>