How Much Do You Pay to Host Your Website? 748
DosGusanos asks: "I was curious how much people around the U.S. and around the world pay for hosting. Obviously size in cabinets/rack units/square feet, included features such as bandwidth, UPS/generator, management, etc. factor in. The configuration I am particularly interested in is three machines, one www, one search, and one database. The machines would be hooked up to a T1 and networked to one another over Ethernet. Anyone paying for colo or hosting in this same ballpark? How happy/upset are you with your provider?"
Just wondering so I can ask you for you business.. (Score:2)
Do use a little favor and don't use the e-mail that post here to offer your services on the cheap.
Talk about target marketing...
apache (Score:2, Insightful)
Rackspace (Score:3, Informative)
Two words: Rackspace Rules
Re:Rackspace (Score:5, Insightful)
At $3.50/Gig, I ended up paying almost 50% over my base fee for a month of popularity.
As a result, I moved the more bandwidth intensive part of the site off to a cheaper server with beefier specs, and felt the pain right away. These guys have no monitoring included, ignore email requests for support, and charged me a consulting fee when I needed my server backed up and wiped because of a Slapper infection.
Not that I blame them, since it's not really managed hosting they are selling, but the difference in service is tremendous.
If you can afford Rackspace - go for it. I think they even have an option to give you a private net work -- link your servers directly one to the other so intra-server communitation doesn't count towards your total bandwidth cap.
Re:Rackspace (Score:5, Informative)
My web pages are not just static HTML, either. This site serves an hour-long interactive training course that certifies over 3000 people a day. And the servers have been working perfectly. In fact, one of my three machines there has an uptime of 355 days (tomorrow is a whole year!!!). They're all running Linux, of course.
Re:Rackspace (Score:3, Funny)
Don't you mean 255 days then?
Re:Rackspace (Score:5, Informative)
Rackspace has a long history of being apathetic at best to spamvertized sites, despite their anti-spam Terms of Service. As of 3-Dec-02, they're still hosting at least 20 or so spammers, [spamhaus.org] and chunks of their netspace may still be listed on SPEWS. [spews.org]
Cheap or not, good customer service or not, I would be very wary about selecting Rackspace for any sort of hosting.
Re:Rackspace (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm glad you mentioned this. I've been using Verio for the last couple years. Everything has been really good, except for little skirmishs with the blacklists.
When I first signed up, just about two years ago, there were just a couple of the minor blacklists listing a netblock that had my IP number. The listings were for a spammer that Verio had kicked off months ago. I contacted the blacklist maintainers (only one of those lists was could be be called "maintained"). It's remarkably difficult to contact these people. Eventually the better list dropped the block, and that gave me enough leverage to convince the other two to do the same (the spammer had long since moved on for greener pastures).
But in the last year or so, there's been a whole new crop of spammer acusations. I can't verify them... it reads like a whole lot of conspiracy theory. But a couple weeks ago it even got posted as a slashdot story (so it must be true, right?)
I called Verio. Before the slashdot story, they would just deny everything. They didn't admit they were catering to any spammers, but they didn't flat out deny that no spammers were operating on their network.
Verio claims that their hosting business is very separate from their network provision services (T1, T3, OC-something lines.... more bandwidth than I can envision). So far, the more reputable blacklists haven't waged netblocks on Verio's hosting side, or at least the few IP numbers allocated to my little server.
So because of these escalating wars between the spammers and blacklists, if you intend to host a mail server, the ISPs record about hosting spammers should be your top concern. Saddly, there are a lot of mixed messages and it's hard to tell if any particular provider is any good. Two years ago, for example, Verio was listed at the top of SpamCop's page of providers with exemplary anti-abuse policies.
Recently I've been making some tenative plans for jumping ship from Verio. Other than this spammer/blacklist issue, and one little incident where they didn't notify me in advance of (supposedly) scheduled maintainance (they claim they did), the decicated hosting service from Verio has been great.
But hitting blacklists, even occasionally, is a real show-stopper. For my little site, we do a light amount of e-commerce. When a confirmation email to a customer bounces (they placed the order over the web), we look like a little fly-by-night company out to steal their credit card info. Of course, emails bounce for a variety of other reasons, so we've gotten into the practive of picking up the phone and calling them with the tracking number.
The sad news is that there doesn't seem to be any really good way of determining if a provider is hosting or provisioning bandwidth to spammers. Even if everything looks good in advance (as it did 2 years ago with Verio), things change.... and they change more rapidly that you'd want to move providers when everything else is running so smoothly.
I wish I could recommend Verio, as the service, performance and reliability has been excellent. But this spammer problem and the reaction from the blacklisting community is definately something you don't want to get caught in the middle of.
I'm taking Rackspace off my short list of "plan B" options if the Verio/blacklist situation gets worse. Rackspace was actually at the top of my list.
Re:Rackspace (Score:4, Informative)
Politech got blacklisted [politechbot.com] several times.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Rackspace (Score:4, Informative)
Rackspace rules them all. We've been with them for over two years now and I don't believe we will ever leave them. We've done our shopping, but compare Rackspace to any of the others and you'll realize something - these guys REALLY know what they're doing.
We will be at 9 servers with them in a couple of days (just added 3 more). We use just under 1.5TB of bandwidth every month. At this level of usage, we get it for $2/GB. That is certainly not bad. Given that their network has never had an unexpected outage (not that I can remember at least) I feel it's very justified.
The folks there _really_ know what they're doing. The sales guys don't try to be technical guys, the sales engineers are on the ball. The tech support folks can solve a lot of the problems right there but when the shit hits the fan they'll send you straight to the guy in the data-center. I've spoken to one of the founders (something technical, don't remember what) and I didn't even ask for him, they just conferenced him in.
We've been in some pretty bad spots before (lost most of a RAID 5 array once) and they've pulled us out of the gutters.
I've had security folks tell me the Rackspace network is very secure. But I cannot personally confirm this.
We're not a big customer of theirs by no means. We're TINY. I know they've got some very large contracts but they really do care about us. The
little guys.
I could easily go on for hours here so I will stop now. If you can afford it, get Rackspace. You will not be sorry.
"Free" hosting... (Score:3, Informative)
I get DSL through Speakeasy [speakeasy.net] and they allow hosting of Web sites. I pay $160/month for 4 static IPs and 768Kbps SDSL. Medium speed hosting and I host dozens of Web sites off my connection. Great deal!
Re:"Free" hosting... (Score:2)
Re:"Free" hosting... (Score:2)
And third. If you're really worried about reliability and you're someplace where there's a second (non-Covad - which Speakeasy is for SDSL) DSL provider, there are ways to hook up, say two 1.5 meg DSL lines over different providers to the same site, and then run a script from a third site that checks that each line is up every minute or two and uses dynamic DNS updates to refer your traffic one way or the other - or both. Tricky, but it can be done. Then for less than the price of a T1 you're running the equivalent of 2 T1's.
A main reason to use a remote hosting service rather than host at your own location is such redundancy. But it's much easier to maintain a machine on your own premises. Some hosting services will charge you extra for each time you even ask them to glance in the direction of the machine on their racks they renting you.
Re:"Free" hosting... (Score:3, Interesting)
Consequently I'm getting charged only $30...so it's a pretty good deal to run one domain on a P3 1 GHz, 512 MB RAM, 30 GB HDD machine.
OT: They went downhill fast. (Score:2)
Re:Speakeasy.net Sucks (Score:5, Interesting)
If speakeasy.net is the cream of the crop, the others must shoot your dog or something. I honestly don't see how an ISP could be any worse.
HostBaby plug (Score:2, Informative)
It's $20/month for 200MB, no set up and the first month is free. I know about them because their service works with Andromeda [turnstyle.com].
They're good guys.
And as a Slashback recommendation... (Score:3, Funny)
T1 and local hosting (Score:2, Informative)
Small businesses with Real People Support (Score:3, Informative)
Check out epinions.com for other people's opinions on hosting providers.
$40/mo (Score:2, Funny)
(Check Post Anonymously)
(Click Submit)
Three machines for a dual T1 ? (Score:3, Informative)
Colo (Score:2, Insightful)
This may seem obvious (Score:5, Informative)
Another Web hosting rating service . . . (Score:2, Informative)
For a side-by-side comparison.... (Score:5, Informative)
Find one that looks adequate for your needs, then ask about it on webhostingtalk.com, to make sure it's reputable.
old pricing only.... (Score:2)
'99 Exodus: 1 rack in a shared cage $900/mo. Bandwidth: $950/Mb/mo.
'00 Qwest: full locked cabinet $800/mo. Bandwidth: $800/Mb/mo.
Just some prices I remember from then... would really like to hear what these same things are going for right now...
Did you mean Gb/mo!? (Score:2)
ten US bux (Score:2)
knowing the ppl who take care of the server your sites runs on, the ppl who backs-up your data is important. at for me is.
Worldcom (Score:2, Insightful)
What I've got... (Score:2)
I also share 4 1U machines and a UPS colo'd in a facility that provides an unmetered 5Mbit connection (provided over ethernet) for about $180/mo per machine.
On top of that, I split the costs on a data center which has 2 regular old T1s and a whole fuckton of servers, since it's our space, and the Ts run about $1500/mo.
DMCA (Score:3, Funny)
ServerBeach (Score:5, Interesting)
I like them a lot. $100 / month for a dedicated server that's a 1ghz duron with 512 meg of ram and 60 gig hard drive. That's more than enough power for the sites I host. For $1000/month with them, I could get a site that can't be slashdotted.
The downside is support. They only have a mail ticketing system, and you're pretty much left to handle your own problems, but that's okay. I pretty much considered it a learning experience installing / configuring my own BIND, Apache, Mysql, and GD.
The best part of this is that they include 400gig/month in bandwidth to use. It would take some serious bandwidth to suck all that up. It's burstable too.
FYI they're based in Texas. If you're looking for discounted hosting, go for it!
Of course, don't cry to me if you run a commerce site with them. It's my belief that any site that's a breadwinner for a company should run at a place that has 24/7 support. A ticketing system is fine, just make sure there's always someone there to answer it.
Overall, I like them. Cheap enough to keep me happy, and it's my own machine with root so I can install/config and run whatever I want.
Re:ServerBeach (OT) (Score:3, Funny)
Re:ServerBeach (Score:4, Informative)
Support also sounds about the same. Which would be fine, except I had a bad experience with them when they gave me a server with a bad hard drive. Bad hardware happens sometimes -- but they denied the problem and tried to blame it on me for quite a while, which shouldn't happen.
But most of the time I don't need them to do anything, and everything works well.
Work == lots of bandwidth (Score:2, Interesting)
No - very very kindly.
Generally they'll have more bandwidth that they need. And if they've got a Packeteer or a FlowFusion, they can let you have the remainder of the bandwidth that they aren't using. The way I see it, is that any bits on an E1 that aren't being used is money being wasted.
Obviously, it goes without saying that spam, warez, and pr0n is a no-no.
But if they're cool, they may well let you sneak in a few boxes.
Re:Work == lots of bandwidth (Score:5, Informative)
Just curious.
C//
Re:Work == lots of bandwidth (Score:3, Insightful)
not all employers are sour pusses, you know.
Obviously you want to ASK if it's okay to borrow some company bandwidth, and I have no pity for the guy that starts using it without asking. If they give the go-ahead however, there's absolutely nothing wrong with it. Some companies may give you free coffee, others may give you an ethernet port on a switch.. consider it a perk.
My website has been hosted, for free, for almost 3 years now on a machine that lives in exactly this situation. It exists with the full knowledge of the superiors, and the word is as long as the machine complies with company security policy, it can continue to exist.
eryxma.com (Score:4, Interesting)
the service has been great. the ceo even gave me his AIM screenname. I recommend them highly.
Re:eryxma.com (Score:3, Insightful)
ServePath has been GREAT! (Score:2, Informative)
I have a couple of dedicated servers with them and their prices are great. They have UPS/Generator, and I can even remotely power cycle my box with a web site. They have a cool site too that tells me how much transfer I've used and that good stuff.
They're located in SanFran too, so they're pretty well connected. I heard that's like the best place in the US to host a box.
I'd recommend them to anyone. They do colo's too.
I know I'm happy when I have a 140+ day uptime.
Later.
Message Board costs (Score:5, Interesting)
We pay roughly 6,000 per year. This includes the software, the hardware, the bandwidth and the service. (This is through http://www.ezboard.com) We have been very happy with the service, receiving assistance from the company CEO when need be. Their software/hardware is also capable of handling very long threads, (our longest being over 12,000 posts and 130mb for the text only before becoming corrupted.)
hmmm (Score:2)
I believe your definition of "capable" differs from mine.
Re:hmmm (Score:2, Informative)
Beware of Rip-Offs... (Score:5, Informative)
Also, the WebHostingTalk forums have a dedicated forum subsection for having companies compete over you... it was somewhat amusing when I did so. I got like 5 responses within an hour, plus 5 or so e-mails. But then I realized that the bandwidth I'd require was much greater than I anticipated (or could afford), so I edited my post saying something like that. And they're still e-mailing me. Like once a week...
Re:Beware of Rip-Offs... (Score:5, Funny)
But read the fine print in their service agreement --
There are a couple ways to look at this... (Score:2, Informative)
$300 a month, one tile, unlimited power, T3 connectivity. You provide the UPS, Rack, and Servers, they provide a chair and an ashtray. Works for me, and you can sublease the rack space.
Hurricane Electric, Baby (Score:5, Informative)
Running your own server loads of fun, don't get me wrong, but $10 a month for all this stuff seems worth it. Unless you really have money to burn, it's impossible to the same kind of performance out of your own server... Do you think Verizon will run a gigabit backone and Hubble power connector to my house for $10?
Hurricane Electric http://www.he.net/ [he.net]
$4/month for OK hosting (Score:2)
It's not bad... a couple hundred megs, PHP, CGI, FTP access, etc. Reliability isn't the greatest though, sometimes it's very slow, other times I get host timeouts.
All in all though, it's worth $4/month to put up some stuff that no one really looks at anyway :-)
$15 a month (Score:2)
Hosts like this can be found all over the place if you ask the right people or check the right web sites. Just don't be suckered in by cute web pages; word of mouth is one of the best ways to judge.
Linux/BSD box behind DSL not always best. (Score:2)
In either case, however, this solution is not sufficient for a site that is expected to have lots of traffic, or that you want to use for an e-commercie or other corporate solution.
hmm (Score:2)
As someone else suggested, webhostingtalk.com is a great resource.
There are certainly some hosts to stay away from; I won't mention their names here (as I am in said industry and don't wish to say ill of competitors) but you can figure out who by reading that above site
johncompanies (Score:2)
The level of support is beyond belief, it is as good as the testimonials on the site say it is.
Amazing value for my US $65/month. There is not a higher recommendation to give.
[/gush]
My small ISP (Score:3, Interesting)
$35/mo per machine + $50/mo per 3kB/sec (about 7.5 GB a month) So for $85/mo you can co-lo a server with me. I will say that most clients I have know me. Not too many people are willing to put a machine in someones basement.
I have a generator, 60 min of UPS for everything, and redundant T1. Not bad for a company called:
"2 Geeks and a Pipe"
I am curious how this price compares to what is avaiable out there? Comments?
Actual answer with actual $$$ here (Score:3, Informative)
We [premieragendas.com] (and we [mydiscoverzone.com]) host about 5 major sites at a 3-server setup with this service provider [netnation.com].
Our cost is less than $1100 US a month. If we use more than 300 GB a month we start paying extra, but not too much ...
Not sure why you were going to do 1 web, 1 search, 1 db box; we do 2 http and one db, and when we add, we'll be adding http boxes, as putting our (extensively customized per user) pages together takes a bit of horsepower.
$25 per year (Score:2)
25 megs server space, email, ftp, and a domain name. docbrown.net [docbrown.net] is hosted through them, and I've never had a complaint.
Dreamhost (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't think they offer co-location, but they do offer dedicated machines for managed or unmanaged co-hosting. If you're interested in signing up, click here [dreamhost.com].
Marginal cost: $0.00 (Score:2)
(If you're in Las Vegas and considering something similar, the residential-grade service from Cox (the one that uses the cheap cable modems you find in stores) most likely won't work. If Cox issued you a Com21 cable modem (which costs a bit under $300 if you want to buy one), you're getting their business-grade service and can pretty much do what you want (though you'll need a static IP to run an SMTP server). The strange part is that the last time I checked, there's no difference in cost between the two types of service.)
We do something similar with the cable-modem connection at work. For a low-to-medium-traffic site, there's no reason to not use your existing broadband connection. Having your servers onsite makes keeping an eye on them much easier.
Depends on its usage (Score:2)
My experience w/ modwest.com (Score:2)
I run a personal web site [misterorange.com] that I don't do much more than blog and rant on, but it's still ran using my own MySQL database that modwest provides, and the ability to telnet into my account is definitely icing on the cake. Plus the fact I'm only paying $11.95 a month sealed it for me. In the sixth months or so I've been using the service, I've only had two incidents, both of which not lasting more than an hour, where my website was down. And one of those was due to a DNS problem on my end.
I'm not sure about any other providers (other than yahoo, which you should stay far, far away from), but modwest is a damn fine choice.
My own box for NOK 1500 a month (Score:2)
I'm paying NOK 1500 a month, that's about $200. Very few ISPs around here just host customers boxes around here, and even fewer allow people to play with it as they please. I'm just aware of one other than this, and they're more expensive. The bill is actually shared between a non-profit I work for, and my father...
The bandwidth to it is excellent. It is actually sitting on the top of the national backbone. That's not going to last, unfortunately, it was just because they are rebuilding their server room. The bottleneck there is probably the hard drive and not the network anyway... :-)
JohnCompanies - Collocation Services - SWEET (Score:5, Informative)
I pay $65 / Month
- root on your own server
- Full FreeBSD Filesystem
- 2 gigabytes disk space
- 40 Gigs transfer / Month
- Firewall access
- Unlimited tech support
- We supply the hardware
I'm currently running a very kickass apache box with an incredible uptime (they've been down once and they weren't really down, just a network problem, 90% of my customers were able to still reach the sites)
I'm hosting over 30 domains on there, not low bandwidth either. And I'm probably going to be buying more boxes to setup a web serving cluster as the number of users increases
The support is fast fast fast. I get replies in less than 5 minutes in some cases.
http://www.johncompanies.com/
ProHosters is amazing (Score:2, Interesting)
ProHosters [prohosters.com]
how to buy a dedicated (Score:5, Informative)
Ask how many internet connections they have and what speed with each one.
Ask how many NIC cards will be in your machine.
Ask what your max Mbps is
(This always gets you put on hold) Ask what the machines bus speed is
Ask if RAM upgrades/HD additions are priced per month or if there is a one time fee.
Ask if they will search your box for illegal materials. (you be surprised how many said yes) That means you are not the only one with root. so throw them out of the list.
Ask if you get unlimited users accounts. (dell host caps you at 100 pops) thats not full service!
Ask what the minimum billing is for support. some have 30 min some have 1 hr.
Ask if they use a in house linux distribution.
Ask if they offer security bullitens and offer links to patches.
call there tech support before you sign up and tell them you are a customer. (play the dumb blonde) see how they treat you.
Ask your salesman for their cellphone. (that gets some laughs)
Look up the server companies IP block then hit em on ARIN and see if they own a substantial block or if they own one at all!!
Ask if you are your own dns or if you have to use theirs.
Ask if your on a virtual dedicated.
Ask what the levels of discount are per GIG over allocation.
Ask who owns them
Ask about offsite back ups storage., how far away is it?
Ask if you are allowed on their property
Ask the price of additional IPS
Ask if you can tour the facility
Ask if you can ethernet multiple boxes to bypass bandwidth fees.
Ask if you can host adult sites
Ask if your machine has a control panel that support insists you use. (cobalt!!! ahhhh!!!)
ask how long they have had a business license.
and last, ask about the spam policies and what they consider spam and what the fine is per message.
that should help with the fodder
Re:how to buy a dedicated (Score:4, Informative)
You present a lot of great questions, but remember: A -> B != ~A -> ~B. They might have root on your box even if they don't search it. So better be anal and just ask them if they'll be logging into your box ever.
Re:how to buy a dedicated (Score:5, Interesting)
Seriously.
Powweb (Score:2)
These guys are *very* good (Score:2)
For people looking for budget hosting: (Score:3, Informative)
$2/GB traffic
$.50/GB/day storage
$.15/minute CPU time (for scripts)
It's easy to track your usage through their website, and create multiple accounts with different privilidges. For any site with less than 100 visitors a day, this is perfect, because there's no monthly charge. I've maintained my church's website for 6 months there, and haven't exceeded $.15 yet.
nearlyfreespeech.com [nearlyfreespeech.com] is cheaper, but they don't allow ssh (or telnet) access. This is a big downside for those of us who enjoy unix because of it's user interface ;)
Unfortunately, I can't help you if you need more bandwith than those guys can give. Good luck!
Reseller accounts! (Score:3, Interesting)
We get 1gb of disk, and 20gb transfer. This is the lowest option, you can get a lot more.
Checkit out.
www.wpidalamar.com - Personal web site
Our joint-venture: www.geek4.com - public web site, like slashdot, but anyone can post, and then people can subscribe to various authors to determine what news they get.
JohnCompanies (Score:2)
I had hosted for free in my last two jobs, but my new company is so small that they won't let me plug my bsd box into the network (I am employee #12 and they did not want it to look like it was favoritism). So time to go and actually pay for hosting, ouch.
I was ready to bite the bullet and pick a cheapo unix shop, but I was so addicted to having full control of my free bsd server that I kept looking around and found JohnCompanies. $65 for a virtual colo, so the physical server is running multiple virtual partitions that to the user look like a full system. I said screw it, if it does not work I lose $65 and I can look elsewhere.
So far everything they have promised has been right on the money. The support is AWESOME. Email them at the weirdest hours and a real person replies within minutes. They don't charge for backups (my company has a colo that wants $200/month extra to do backups for us). The server runs pretty damn fast, and it is triple-homed.
When you receive the server it is freeBSD4.6 and stripped to the bone. The only thing running is sendmail and ssh, plus a fresh ports tree. Anything else you want, you install yourself exactly how you want it. Don't know how to do something? Email support and they will walk you thru it.
I am hosting 5 websites and running mail feeds for 2 and so far no outages and no complaints.
By the way, if you are an open source developer they will give you a price break, and they also have deals for Linux instead of freeBSD and also for actual rack space if you want to provide your hardware.
managed hosting--pogo linux (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm very happy with them, $149 a month for their hardware at their site (15 GB xfer/month). I've paid more to CoLo my own boxes.
You have root access on your box.
Had no service interruptions or power outages since I've been with them. I just checked my uptime and it was 292 days, I bounced it earlier this year after patching something.
Anyways, I'm not affiliated, etc, but I've been very happy with PogoLinux.
$36,000.00 per year! (Score:4, Funny)
Hurricane Electric, $200/month colo (Score:3, Informative)
When I first signed up with HE.net, the $200 rate was for 1U or 2U of rack space, but I'm quite sure they sent me a card more recently quoting the same rate for 4U of space. I think they offered a half-rack for a really good price (maybe $400 per month?). Their rates might be cheaper now, or they may have different specials. You didn't say what size or shape your three servers are, so I have no idea whether your equipment could fit in 3U of space, or might need 12U or even as much as 21U. (A rack unit, or RU, is 1.75 inches vertically, by something like 26x39 width and depth, sorry I don't have the actual dimensions handy.)
They provide all the features of a good colo facility: enclosed, locked racks (so someone servicing a machine in another rack can't knock out your cables, as sometimes happened with other colo providers I used); 24/7 staffing and access if needed; UPS and air conditioning; staff that will power-cycle your server at no charge, and they even hooked up a monitor and keyboard to see what was wrong when my server's power supply failed, and they didn't charge extra for that. I think they also have the fancy oxygen-reducing and fire-suppressing equipment.
I was extremely happy with Hurricane Electric, by far the best of my three experiences with colocating a server in the area. They have facilities in San Jose and Fremont, California.
Beware: When I was shopping for colo services, I often found that the salesman's claims were not honored in the contract or in practice. One colo provider told me for THREE months that my outages were not their fault, then when I spent money and proved they were at fault, they agreed and allowed me to terminate my contract, but wouldn't make good on any promises (thankfully I did not sue, since they filed for bankruptcy several months later).
In some cases, you may be promised 24/7 access, but when you need access at 2am you find out that there is no staff from midnight to 8am and the on-call tech just refuses to come out because he's really tired and you're not an important customer. Or they promise redundant internet connections from multiple backbone providers, but they are connected to those providers through a single Pacific Bell T1 line (e.g. they had one T1 line that connected to a facility served by multiple backbone providers, but if the T1 line is lost, your connection is lost). And of course, with the domino of bankruptcies of colo providers, many facilities close with only a week's warning, and sometimes a facility may be closed and your equipment disconnected and shipped to another facility without your knowledge -- so your server is offline for several days, and then when you want to pick it up from San Jose, you find out it was shipped to Virginia.
Read the fine print in your contract.
My take on Pair and Fatcow (Score:3, Informative)
Use mod_gzip people. (Score:3, Insightful)
Anyhow, we use it on our properties that have message forums, and we easily take 120K threads down to around 10K per page impression. This could definitely help you save on your bandwidth spikes if you run a burstable or 95th percentile billing with your ISP.
mod_gzip here [sourceforge.net]
T1: A Slow Beast? (Score:3, Interesting)
While 1.5 Mbps is a substantial amount of bandwidth, DSL/cable modems are becoming increasingly common. I maintain a server hosted on a T1 that's mainly used for web browsing during the day, and when I do bandwidth-intensive file transfer from my cable modem, I'm able to come very close to filling the T1. While serving normal webpages does work flawlessly, I just wanted to point out that if you offer downloads -- or even just use lots of images/Flash -- your bandwidth will disappear surprisingly quickly. A single user with a cable modem can be eating up all your bandwidth. (Again, I'm not suggesting that a T1 is now worthless, just advising people -- if the T1 is shared with numerous other sites, if a single one is somewhat active, you may have precious little bandwidth.)
Re:AOL (Score:2, Interesting)
No wonder it's number one! *cringe*
We are currently paying the cost of a T1 in the bay area. I spend a very small amount of time actually managing the servers. Initial investment was the hardware (6 rackmount boxes, load balancing box, firewall, managed UPS, net hardware..blah blah).
Maybe Im just paranoid, but I wouldn't feel right hosting our websites on someone elses hardware. It would be like having sex in your parent's bed.
Perhaps we could save money on bandwidth by putting our hardware somewhere else, but I get the feeling that it would be a wash whether it is hosted on-site or at a colo facility.
Re:AOL (Score:3, Funny)
I don't see your point.
I have sex in your parents bed all the time.
Re:Overkill? (Score:2)
Re:I love my provider (Score:5, Interesting)
Speakeasy could only offer me sdsl at 128k - for $60/month... PacBell wanted $49 for 1.5/384 adsl.
I wrote them a bunch to find out the terms of my contract - and was told different things by different people. So I decided to leave.
Since I told speakeasy that I was going to leave they were trying to charge me $350 for terminating the contract. I told them no way I was going to pay that. I told them of all the conflicting info I got from all their service reps, and told them that since they couldnt even clearly show me the terms of my service, their claim that there was a termination fee of that size was BS. They said they'd have to bill me for it. I said go ahead and bill me - but there is no way in hell you're ever getting any money from me. I have a better service here - you cant/wont match it, and you want more money for me. We can go to court if you like - but I doubt you would win. They billed me once. I mailed them all the email correspndence I had with them - and they dropped it.
Re:I love my provider (Score:2)
Speakeasy was nice and upfront about their terms of service, and that they'd like to only do 384/128. I said that 1.5/384 worked fine for PacBell, and they put that in. Worked great since.
Re:I [dont'] love [speakeasy] (Score:2, Interesting)
All throughout, they kept the polite smiley attitude that everybody from Seattle seems to have, but nobody was actually willing to help me there. I would really recommend that folks stay away from all big ISPs, esp Speakeasy, and find local small-fry ISPs who actually want your business.
Re:$0.00 (Score:3, Funny)
As a State of Washington taxpayer, I am not so sure I am happy about you serving pages over a connection I subsidize.
So, you can send me forty bucks a month and we'll call it even!
$68/year or $5.66/month (Score:2)
http://www.blueboxinternet.com/
Planet P [planetp.cc] - Liberation with Technology.
Re:$68/year or $5.66/month (Score:3, Funny)
Is that for your lifetime or the flawed business? (Score:2)
I charge my self nothing but the phone company is a completely different matter altoghether.
Oklasoft. Oklahoma's fastest growing software company. (lol, damn you Groening).
I pay $0 for a lifetime hosting.... (Score:2)
www.doteasy.com [doteasy.com]
I pay $0 for hosting, but... (Score:3, Insightful)
I think a dedicated server's the best thing ever. I can host as many sites as I want, and install anything I damn well please. My IMAP account has all non-junk messages I've received in the last 2 years (taking up around 80MB) so I can access all my old email from anywhere (using my webmail interface).
Quite frankly, I wouldn't go back to a web host even if they paid me to.
Re:I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's only 10% more effective in maintaining a constant look&feel across different platforms (compared against 75% of DHTML standard as running on 60% of modern web browsers).
It takes up (on average) 350% more bandwidth than comparitive look&feel generated with HTML.
It requires almost 400% more CPU time which contributes to an increased load of 1-2% on 5% of the power stations around the US. This leads to an average 3% increased emissions of greenhouse gases thus causing a decrease in the time until the heat death of the Universe of about .0005%.
Oh, and 90% of all users find Flash annoying as all hell when it's the only form of content on a webpage.
Re:I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Not everybody owns a recent PC (Score:4, Insightful)
Flash works perfect in all windows, mac and linux systems.
Not all computers on the Internet run a Microsoft Windows® OS, a Mac® OS, or a Linux® OS.
Everybody these days has a P3 or athlon or higher.
Where did you find a figure that 99% or more web users are
Re:I paid $200 for a lifetime hosting.... (Score:3, Interesting)
This is probably why you are trolling for clients on Slashdot instead of getting them through search engine referrals and word-of-mouth advertising.
Re:Why don't you go do your own research? (Score:5, Funny)
Also, did you ever think that it's the editors who are too lazy to do their own research?
CmdrTaco: Did you see the latest bill for our website - aack! We've got to stop posting such big stories, or else we're going to have to find another provider.
michael: Why don't we ask the
timothy: They've been pretty pissed at us lately - have you seen the comments?
michael & CmdrTaco: No.
timothy: Why don't we pretend it's from another person, then...
CmdrTaco: Great! It's so crazy, it just might work!
Re:Why don't you go do your own research? (Score:4, Funny)
michael: or maybe if we just stopped posting the same stories twice...
Re:hosting is an IT perk for me (Score:2)
What they are getting is your full attention if something goes wrong with the configuration since you are probably going to care more if your own site is affected by any possible downtime that can occur.
IE: they get a tech monitoring it for free off-hours
Also, the pessimist might think that they are also making it so that if there IS a problem, then they have a "fall-guy" to cover them if it came down to it..
Re:Rack Shack (Score:2, Informative)
They give you tonnes of bandwidth (400GB per machine), too. Roughly 150kbps (a T1 basically).
They do load balancing? No way, I was told they didn't, because I could really use it!
Re:Rack Shack (Score:2, Informative)
I rent two (2) 1.3 GHz Athlons with 512M RAM and 40 GB IDE drives for a total of $200/mo. That comes with 400 GB of traffic per machine (averages out about a 100% utilized T1 throughout the month).
The machines have different functions, and rsync allows them to mirror each other. Either machine can take over the duties of the other in case of failure.