Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

A Few Hardware Bits

CmdrTaco posted more than 11 years ago | from the well-lookie-here dept.

Hardware 76

Zygo writes "Most people seemed to like the hardware bites so here's another edition: A small HD @ GideonTech, the VapoChill PE @ [H]ard|OCP, a big GPU cooler @ OCAddiction, PSU Relay Timer guide @ Virtual-Hideout, a water cooling kit on OverClocker Café, Heat spreaders on OCIA , and to end a PSU at Exteme Overclocking"

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Overcocking (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4891878)

A few hardworn tits (-1)

Fecal Troll Matter (445929) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891896)

Anthrax Vaccine Facts

1. According to the FDA product information leaflet, no scientific studies have been performed
on the Anthrax Vaccine to determine if it causes cancer.

2. According to the FDA product information leaflet, no scientific studies have been performed
on the Anthrax Vaccine to determine if it has any effect on fertility. This applies to both males
and females. It is not known if this drug will effect fertility or, if successful in conceiving, the
fetus.

3. According to the FDA product information leaflet, no scientific studies have been performed
on the Anthrax Vaccine to determine if it will protect you from inhaled anthrax spores.

4. According to the U. S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, there is no
scientific evidence to suggest that this vaccine will protect you from aerosolized anthrax.

5. A principal chemical component of the Anthrax Vaccine, formaldehyde, is not approved for
human consumption according to the U. S. Government Material Data Safety Sheet.

6. A principal chemical component of the Anthrax Vaccine, benzethonium chloride, has not been
evaluated for human consumption according to the U. S. Government.

7. The only facility licensed to produce the Anthrax Vaccine has been cited by the FDA for
quality control problems.

8. Most physicians know very little about the vaccine, other than what they are told by the
government in preparation for implementation of this program.

In Soviet Russia... (-1, Offtopic)

Jonny 290 (260890) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891899)

you wouldn't be such a poor fucking troll!

Suck it down, first Soviet Russia post! This one's for WIPO.

Re:In Soviet Russia... (1)

altinsel (54917) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891926)

Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...

Hmm.. versus the "space is a vacuum" scheme of generating posts?

Umm. (2, Insightful)

mehfu (451236) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891906)

Looks like a bunch of articles from the most well-known hardware sites. They wouldn't be too hard to find, and IMHO they're not very newsworthy.

NEXT: Dell sells computers.

Re:Umm. (1)

af_robot (553885) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891914)

Yea, but at least it's not the another dupe story!

Re:Umm. (1)

irc.goatse.cx troll (593289) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891922)

Yet. Give it a day, Have some faith in the editors. They'll repost it atleast twice.

Re:Umm. (2)

Dicky (1327) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892032)

NEXT: Dell sells computers.

Okay, I read this as:
NEXT sells computers.
Now that would be news!

Re:Umm. (1)

Gerald (9696) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892157)

NEXT does sell computers. They just happen to have Apple logos on them.

News Bit: Weapons Inspectors To Visit U.S. +1, Fun (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4892059)


CANADIANS TO LEAD WEAPONS INSPECTION TEAM INTO USANovember 21, 2002
(Toronto) - A coalition of Canadian peace groups today
announced their intention to send an international team of
volunteer weapons inspectors into the United States later
this winter. The coalition, Rooting Out Evil, are recruiting
inspectors through their newly launched website,
Routing Out Evil [rootingoutevil.org]
.
"Our action has been inspired by none other than George W.
Bush," said Christy Ferguson, a spokesperson for the group.
"The Bush administration has repeatedly declared that the
most dangerous rogue nations are those that:
1) have massive stockpiles of chemical, biological, andnuclear weapons;
2) ignore due process at the United Nations;
3) refuse to sign and honour international treaties; and
4) have come to power through illegitimate means.
"On the basis of President Bush's guidelines, it is clear
that the current U.S. administration poses a great threat to
global security," said Ferguson. "We're following Bush's
lead and demanding that the U.S. grant our inspectors
immediate and unfettered access to any site in the country -
including all presidential compounds - so that we can
identify the weapons of mass destruction in this rogue
state," added David Langille.
Visitors to Rooting Out Evil's website are invited to sign
on as honorary members of the weapons inspection team.
Honorary inspectors can participate in the action, or they
can simply lend the support of their name as they would on a
petition. The actual inspection team that crosses the
border will be comprised of prominent individuals from
Canada and other countries.
The Rooting Out Evil coalition includes Greenpeace Canada,
the Centre for Social Justice, and the Toronto Committee
Against War and Sanctions on Iraq, and is supported by
American groups such as the National Network to End the War
Against Iraq, Global Exchange and the US section of the
Women's International League for Peace and Freedom. They
oppose the development, storage, and use of weapons of mass
destruction by any state.--For information: David Langille or Christy Ferguson
info@rootingoutevil.orgDavid Langille, Director of Public Affairs
CENTRE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE489 College Street, Suite 303Toronto, OntarioM6G 1A5
Tel: 416-927-0777 x225Fax: 416-927-7771Toll free: 1-888-803-8881
Email: langille@socialjustice.orgWebsite: http://www.socialjustice.org
Not interested in a war against Iraq?

Become a Weapons Inspector [rootingoutevil.org]

Cheers,
Woot

obUSSR (1)

LittleBigLui (304739) | more than 11 years ago | (#4894387)

IN SOVIET RUSSIA,

Dell sells NeXT computers!!

For +5 Moderation (5, Funny)

pardasaniman (585320) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891915)

For +5 Moderation, insert text of article here

Re:For +5 Moderation (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4891974)

Or search Google for the subject and post the html.

Re:For +5 Moderation (1)

byron150 (124304) | more than 11 years ago | (#4902231)

The fact that this post actually gained this person +5, and I'll admit it was funny....but only funny because he actually got the +5. This should tell you people something......

What's really cool about the VapoChill.. (5, Informative)

TeknoHog (164938) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891931)

Heat transfer is proportional to temperature difference. If our processors were running at 500 degrees, the heat (assuming equal power) would be dissipated much better. Unfortunately the chips don't like high temperatures.

I dunno about the details of VapoChill, but in principle a refrigerator could have its 'hot end' glowing red, thereby increasing heat transfer rate. Remember that the refrigerator only moves the heat around, it doesn't eliminate it. The hot end must be cooled somehow. But unlike the processor, its temperature is not limited by the silicon.

Re:What's really cool about the VapoChill.. (1)

af_robot (553885) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891963)

I dunno about the details of VapoChill...

refrigerator with computer inside

Re:What's really cool about the VapoChill.. (1)

commbat (50622) | more than 11 years ago | (#4893954)

I dunno about the details of VapoChill

One thing I noticed is that the reviewer stated that it used hydroflourocarbons as a refrigerant. Hasn't HFC been banned by just about every industrial nation on earth including the U.S. (but with the notable exception of China.) Think 'Ozone Layer'.

Re:What's really cool about the VapoChill.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4896467)

Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are ozone-safe because they do not contain chlorine (which destroys ozone). R134a refrigerant, now used in automobile air conditioning systems, is an HFC which replaced the chlorinated and ozone-destroying R12 refrigerant (a CFC, or chlorofluorocarbon). The only caveat is that while HFCs are ozone-safe, they contribute very significantly to global warming.

Ahhh! Another hi-tech garbage! (0, Offtopic)

af_robot (553885) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891938)

Screw it! I want my own flying car * now * !

Better title (3, Funny)

thopo (315128) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891947)


Perhaps they should have named the story: A Few Hardware Sites in the Arena, from the slashdot-effect-as-a-benchmark dept.
And after only 10 posts the Overclocker Cafe was already kicked out of the ring! Whos next? Stay tuned!

Ram coolers? (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4891951)

WTF? That thing only reduced the tempreture by half a centigrade!

Re:Ram coolers? (3, Informative)

stratjakt (596332) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892000)

Heat spreaders do absolutely nothing but look good inside a windowed case. They run no cooler or hotter, and noone has gotten ram to perform any better with or without them.

Your DIMMs will actually run better with a little bit of a breeze moving stale air off of the chips than it would with a piece of aluminum stuck on with a length of sticky 'thermal' tape.

It's just something to sell to the 'eXTreMe l337 p00ter h4xorz!'

Re:Ram coolers? (2)

Phosphor3k (542747) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892227)

Lets see you take the heat spreaders off of the memory in a system that uses RAMBUS. Wanna see what happens then? Oh, it might not fail immediatly, but there is a reason manurfacturers ship RAMBUS ram with heat spreaders onboard.

Re:Ram coolers? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4893047)

what, beacuse RAMBUS == crap that runs too fucking hot without them? RAMBUS is a plauge that needs to be wiped off the face of the earth.

Re:Ram coolers? (3, Interesting)

hitzroth (60178) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892345)

I'd suspect that a heat spreader has a greater surface area than a few RAM chips. Greater surface area + decent heat conduction = better cooling. Albeit, most memory probably doesn't run hot enough for this to matter, but it is the rough equvalent of running your CPU without a heatsink. You wouldn't do that with a modern CPU, would you?

Re:Ram coolers? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4893665)

For the same reason I have a heat-sink for my keyboard and mouse. Albeit, most keyboards and mice probably don't run hot enough for this to matter, but it is the rough equvalent of running your CPU without a heatsink. You wouldn't do that with a modern CPU, would you?

Re:Ram coolers? (2, Informative)

ackthpt (218170) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892027)

WTF? That thing only reduced the tempreture by half a centigrade!

My GEIL DDR 256MB came with a spreader, it's kinda odd, as I don't think it's going to do much of a job as a heatsink, but it does afford a bit more surface area and that ram does get warm. And overclocking memory, from what I've heard, does make it run hotter, just like when you OC a CPU. Sockets being as close together as they are, I don't think there's much else that can safely be done to heatsink your memory. Many something vertical with a few blunt spines which won't cut into cables.

Re:Ram coolers? (2)

cybergibbons (554352) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892174)

To be fair, a far better way of cooling RAM is to buy a bulk pack of stick on finned heatsinks for SOICs (or DIPs). They would need to be low profile to fit, but the finned area would be far greater than with these heat spreaders. They are also normally black, and although this will reduce the amount of heat transferred to moving air (which is essentially conduction at the surface), it will allow heat to be radiated quicker, so without forced air cooling they will be better.

I've thought about doing it for a while because my RAM gets fairly hot. It's PC133 and it's going at 145Mhz now, but I think I could get it up to 155Mhz if I tried.

There is still a point in overclocking as well - as my computer gets older, it's more and more economical for me to push it further just by spending £10 on a few cheap heatsinks....

Re:Ram coolers? (2)

gl4ss (559668) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892281)

hmm?

i kinda thought it would be more economical to overclock on the instant you buy the computer, since price differences at that point tend to be huge(of course, assuming one does not break anything).

i mean, old puter, it doesnt matter that much if it is 400mhz or 500mhz, it's just few bucks on the imaginary price, but when they were brand new it could easily be 200$ difference...

Re:Ram coolers? (2)

cybergibbons (554352) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892355)

If I break a new XP2200+ chip by overclocking it, that is a lot of money. If I break my Athlon 700, it isn't, they can be picked up at under £20 now. I don't mind pushing the chip to it's limits, because of that.

Also, now I can buy PC133 or even PC150 ram very cheaply. It's easy to push the bus further and further. I can put 1.5GB of memory in my computer for less than £150 and make it go very fast.

To be fair, this computer I am using at the moment goes better than most others because I have a lot of memory which goes quite quickly. Not as fast as DDR or RAMBUS, but because I have more of it, no swapfile....

Count me out ... (1, Offtopic)

phoxix (161744) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891972)

Am I the only one who doesn't like this over clocking stuff??

I think what slashdot needs to do is create an "over-clocking" topic. This way for those of us like myself, we can simple block this new "over-clocking" topic, but still see nifty news in the hardware topic.

just my 2 cents

Sunny Dubey

Re:Count me out ... (2)

GC (19160) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892138)

You are not the only one who doesn't like the Over-Clocking stuff, but I was quite interested in the Water Cooling kit.

I have a dual-Athlon MP system which has 4 fans in it:

1 fan to inject air into the chassis (front)
1 fan to eject air from the chassis (back)
and 1 fan for each CPU.

The system makes a lot of noise, and if you were to look at the Thermaltake kit you'll find that it is not designed to be an overclocking kit at all, in fact it's benchmarks did not beat fan comparisons at all.

Unfortunately I'm still waiting for a 2 Cpu kit, so that I don't have to mess about finding a 2nd Waterblock and extra tubing for my CPUs and then worrying about whether the water pump / radiator is inadequate for cooling two CPUs...

Even more unfortunate is that none of the Kit Manufacturers I have seen so far cater for dual CPU systems, which to me seems to be a niche in the market where Water Cooling would provide a great advantage in reducing noise levels and/or for the overclocking enthusiast.

Re:Count me out ... (4, Interesting)

sawilson (317999) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892729)

My simple way of dealing with case cooling is:

Vantec stealth 80x25 fans. They are cheap as sin,
and really quiet. Also, I don't pull air out of the
case at all, other than what the powersupply fans
do. I push air into the case, and mount filters in
front of all my fans. You can usually fit two fans
in the front of the case pulling air in, and wedge
a 1 dollar air conditioning filter in between the
front fascade and the front of the case. If I need
more cooling, I'll do a side or top fan with an
aluminum mesh screen and trimmed air conditioner
filter over the mesh blowing in as well. If all
the air is blowing into the case, and it's all
filtered, you have a lot less dust. You can get
60mm to 80mm fan adapter kits for your processors
and use the same vantec stealth fans to keep them
cool. Piggy back all this with a thermaltake
silent 360w, remove your rear fan that pulls air
out of the case, and you have very quiet system
that blows air out the back like a hair dryer.

Re:Count me out ... (1)

fshalor (133678) | more than 11 years ago | (#4896488)

Back in my Transport Phenomena days, we did a HW assignment on the heat transfer situation within a case. All things being equal, its usually better to blow air out of the case rather than such it in.


It's better to have cool air sucked through over everything then really fast air pushed through a small part of the case. You're more likely to develop hotspots (dead zones) by pusing air in.


I set the ones on the back out, and have one towards the bottom of the front pushing in. This is primarily to pull air past the HD on its way in. In the back, a 60mm & 80 mm coolmaster for the drives and the heat that rises off the PS.

With this setup, and a coolmaster CU CPU cooler, my 1.1 runs cool. The dual 60 GB HD's are fine, and the case temp is seldem more than a few degres above room temp.

If I switch to pushing in, I get at least 5 degres above room temp. Under heavy load, this quickly jumps to about 10+.

It's loud, but safe.

I'm still trying to work up the gumption to run it with some custom heat pipes and referigerator coil getup I concockted. 9 meter copper coil with a aquarium pump and a modified tt Dragon Orb heatsink.

Re:Count me out ... (1)

t14m4t (205907) | more than 11 years ago | (#4894995)

you actually can get two CPU coolers on any watercooling system. all you need to do is buy a 2nd waterblock, and splice it in when setting up the system. I don't know if either of the systems mentioned here sell CPU waterblocks on their own, but I do know that koolance [koolance.com] does (that's what I'm using right now).

weylin

Re:Count me out ... (5, Funny)

Ed Avis (5917) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892204)

What puzzles me is the way these sites all seem to be 'Extreme Overclocking' or 'Overclocking to the Max'. Where are the sites promising Moderate Overclocking or Careful Now Overclocking or Just A Little Overclocking? This area isn't provided for by current sites. I expect there is a whole mod community competing to get the smallest possible overclock.

Re:Count me out ... (1)

yomegaman (516565) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892259)

If I had a site like that I'd call it "Quantum Overclocking". It sounds all cool and futuristic but it really means "overclocking by the smallest possible amount".

Re:Count me out ... (2)

hitzroth (60178) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892265)

I expect there is a whole mod community competing to get the smallest possible overclock.

Um... I wouldn't count on it. A lot of these guys seem to be engineering types. You know, "see how far it can be pushed before it breaks" kind of people. Doing "just a little" goes completely against the game plan. And is of no value whatsoever. It's like changing to high-performance spark plug wires on your Honda. Bragging rights of a sort, I guess, but doesn't really do anything useful on its own, and tends to be more hassle than it's worth.

I don't care much for overclocking and the associated case modding, but it's great to see that there are people out there who love this kind of stuff. I'm more than happy just to marvel at the occasional inventivness and artistry.

Moderate overclocking is reality (2)

TeknoHog (164938) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892626)

A great example of eXtreme overclocking is the 4GHz P4 hack with a jar of liquid nitrogen, by the Finns at muropaketti.com (muropaketti = cereal box :). It's not something you can sustain for anything except quick penis-enhancing benchmarks.

I'd call it moderate overclocking when people make sure the system is stable, even if they do overclock. This happens quite often, but of course it doesn't half the hype.

Re:Moderate overclocking is reality (2)

Ed Avis (5917) | more than 11 years ago | (#4893510)

The liquid nitrogen should be under software control, so when the load average gets really high some of it pours out and the processor is overclocked to 4GHz. Perhaps a hard real-time operating system could manage this best, or a web server could do it when getting Slashdotted, or a game when there is a lot happening on screen.

And the marketing term is ready-made: Nitro Boost.

Good idea (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4893262)

Yes, good idea. A new topic for overclocking & case modifications would be great!

Re:Count me out ... (1)

ocaddict (634732) | more than 11 years ago | (#4899923)

Yes! You are the only one.

Curious (I'm not a hardware guy) (2)

SteweyGriffin (634046) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891981)

I was watching TechTV the other night and they mentioned that only XP and XP Pro will support HyperThreading. True? Seems W2K would work too.

Don't hate me because I'm beautiful (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4892003)

(and smarter than you fucking losers)

* Moderation of "Doesn't look good for anyone" Friday December 13, @05:56PM
* Reply to "Doesn't look good for anyone" by Vellmont Friday December 13, @05:57PM
* Reply to "Doesn't look good for anyone" by hudsonhawk Friday December 13, @06:05PM
* Reply to "Doesn't look good for anyone" by dissy Friday December 13, @06:06PM
* Moderation of "Doesn't look good for anyone" Friday December 13, @06:47PM
* Reply to "Doesn't look good for anyone" by The Kow Friday December 13, @06:58PM
* Moderation of "Not all meteor showers are alike, which is neat" Friday December 13, @08:22PM
* Reply to "Doesn't look good for anyone" by srvivn21 Friday December 13, @08:25PM
* Moderation of "Not all meteor showers are alike, which is neat" Friday December 13, @08:41PM
* Reply to "Not all meteor showers are alike, which is neat" by Anonymous Coward Friday December 13, @09:01PM
* Reply to "A few of my favorite things" by mstyne Friday December 13, @09:19PM
* Moderation of "A few of my favorite things" Friday December 13, @09:34PM
* Reply to "A few of my favorite things" by Anonymous Coward Friday December 13, @09:41PM
* Moderation of "A few of my favorite things" Friday December 13, @09:41PM
* Moderation of "A few of my favorite things" Friday December 13, @09:50PM
* Reply to "A few of my favorite things" by cuyler Friday December 13, @10:12PM
* Moderation of "A few of my favorite things" Friday December 13, @11:03PM
* Moderation of "A few of my favorite things" Saturday December 14, @12:58AM
* Moderation of "About the director" Saturday December 14, @09:15AM
* Moderation of "About the director" Saturday December 14, @09:16AM
* Moderation of "About the director" Saturday December 14, @09:34AM
* Reply to "Some of us" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @10:20AM
* Reply to "Some of us" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @10:22AM
* Reply to "Re:Yes but," by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @10:27AM
* Moderation of "Some of us" Saturday December 14, @10:30AM
* Reply to "Some of us" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @10:34AM
* Moderation of "Some of us" Saturday December 14, @10:34AM
* Reply to "Some of us" by mondoterrifico Saturday December 14, @10:36AM
* Moderation of "Some of us" Saturday December 14, @10:37AM
* Reply to "Some of us" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @10:40AM
* Moderation of "Re:Yes but," Saturday December 14, @10:42AM
* Reply to "Some of us" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @10:42AM
* Reply to "Some of us" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @10:43AM
* Moderation of "Various quotes, links about Ishikawa" Saturday December 14, @10:43AM
* Moderation of "Some of us" Saturday December 14, @10:43AM
* Moderation of "Some of us" Saturday December 14, @10:50AM
* Reply to "Some of us" by dotgod Saturday December 14, @10:53AM
* Moderation of "Various quotes, links about Ishikawa" Saturday December 14, @11:05AM
* Moderation of "Some of us" Saturday December 14, @11:06AM
* Reply to "Some of us" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @11:09AM
* Moderation of "Some of us" Saturday December 14, @11:14AM
* Moderation of "About the director" Saturday December 14, @11:33AM
* Moderation of "Some of us" Saturday December 14, @11:44AM
* Moderation of "Various quotes, links about Ishikawa" Saturday December 14, @12:06PM
* Moderation of "Various quotes, links about Ishikawa" Saturday December 14, @12:07PM
* Moderation of "Some of us" Saturday December 14, @12:09PM
* Reply to "Oh, and one more thing" by NiceGeek Saturday December 14, @12:27PM
* Reply to "Re:Yes but," by neko the frog Saturday December 14, @12:28PM
* Moderation of "Oh, and one more thing" Saturday December 14, @12:30PM
* Moderation of "Oh, and one more thing" Saturday December 14, @12:31PM
* Moderation of "Oh, and one more thing" Saturday December 14, @12:32PM
* Moderation of "Oh, and one more thing" Saturday December 14, @12:32PM
* Moderation of "Oh, and one more thing" Saturday December 14, @12:34PM
* Reply to "About the director" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @12:39PM
* Reply to "I always just "look" busy" by sg_oneill Saturday December 14, @12:41PM
* Moderation of "Oh, and one more thing" Saturday December 14, @12:44PM
* Moderation of "I always just "look" busy" Saturday December 14, @12:46PM
* Reply to "I always just "look" busy" by LostCluster Saturday December 14, @12:57PM
* Moderation of "I always just "look" busy" Saturday December 14, @12:59PM
* Reply to "Some of us" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @01:00PM
* Moderation of "I always just "look" busy" Saturday December 14, @01:16PM
* Reply to "Some of us" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @01:18PM
* Reply to "Well duh" by SHEENmaster Saturday December 14, @01:21PM
* Moderation of "Not the only problem" Saturday December 14, @01:28PM
* Reply to "I always just "look" busy" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @01:31PM
* Reply to "I always just "look" busy" by ergo98 Saturday December 14, @01:38PM
* Moderation of "Well duh" Saturday December 14, @01:40PM
* Moderation of "Well duh" Saturday December 14, @01:40PM
* Moderation of "Not the only problem" Saturday December 14, @01:47PM
* Reply to "Some of us" by Peaker Saturday December 14, @02:05PM
* Moderation of "Well duh" Saturday December 14, @02:13PM
* Moderation of "I always just "look" busy" Saturday December 14, @02:25PM
* Moderation of "Well duh" Saturday December 14, @02:29PM
* Reply to "Not the only problem" by zook Saturday December 14, @02:39PM
* Moderation of "Not the only problem" Saturday December 14, @02:44PM
* Moderation of "I always just "look" busy" Saturday December 14, @02:45PM
* Moderation of "I always just "look" busy" Saturday December 14, @02:46PM
* Reply to "Oh, and one more thing" by Keds Saturday December 14, @02:49PM
* Reply to "Not a big fan of reviews" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @02:50PM
* Moderation of "Not a big fan of reviews" Saturday December 14, @02:53PM
* Reply to "Not the only problem" by waveclaw Saturday December 14, @03:03PM
* Reply to "Not a big fan of reviews" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @03:10PM
* Reply to "Not a big fan of reviews" by Todd AvErth Saturday December 14, @03:12PM
* Reply to "List Request" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @03:16PM
* Reply to "It's a phone, people" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @03:21PM
* Reply to "It's a phone, people" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @03:22PM
* Reply to "It's a phone, people" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @03:22PM
* Moderation of "It's a phone, people" Saturday December 14, @03:33PM
* Moderation of "I always just "look" busy" Saturday December 14, @03:33PM
* Reply to "It's a phone, people" by Todd AvErth Saturday December 14, @03:35PM
* Reply to "It's a phone, people" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @03:41PM
* Moderation of "It's a phone, people" Saturday December 14, @03:46PM
* Moderation of "Worth it?" Saturday December 14, @03:46PM
* Reply to "Worth it?" by fliplap Saturday December 14, @03:47PM
* Moderation of "Not a big fan of reviews" Saturday December 14, @03:47PM
* Moderation of "Some of us" Saturday December 14, @03:50PM
* Reply to "It's a phone, people" by cptgrudge Saturday December 14, @03:51PM
* Reply to "Some of us" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @03:57PM
* Reply to "About the director" by overunderunderdone Saturday December 14, @04:07PM
* Moderation of "You know what?" Saturday December 14, @04:11PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @04:11PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by dirkdidit Saturday December 14, @04:15PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by RealSurreal Saturday December 14, @04:17PM
* Moderation of "You know what?" Saturday December 14, @04:18PM
* Moderation of "You know what?" Saturday December 14, @04:21PM
* Moderation of "You know what?" Saturday December 14, @04:23PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by mickwd Saturday December 14, @04:24PM
* Moderation of "You know what?" Saturday December 14, @04:24PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by Joe Tie. Saturday December 14, @04:28PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by mesocyclone Saturday December 14, @04:32PM
* Moderation of "It's a phone, people" Saturday December 14, @04:36PM
* Moderation of "You know what?" Saturday December 14, @04:38PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @04:40PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @04:41PM
* Reply to "I always just "look" busy" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @04:43PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @04:45PM
* Moderation of "Not a big fan of reviews" Saturday December 14, @04:54PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by aiken_d Saturday December 14, @04:55PM
* Reply to "Worth it?" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @05:01PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @05:09PM
* Moderation of "It's a phone, people" Saturday December 14, @05:09PM
* Reply to "Well duh" by orange7 Saturday December 14, @05:10PM
* Moderation of "But, it's actually a strength, too" Saturday December 14, @05:13PM
* Reply to "But, it's actually a strength, too" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @05:14PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by drsquare Saturday December 14, @05:16PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @05:24PM
* Reply to "I always just "look" busy" by racerx509 Saturday December 14, @05:25PM
* Reply to "But, it's actually a strength, too" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @05:27PM
* Moderation of "But, it's actually a strength, too" Saturday December 14, @05:28PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by willpost Saturday December 14, @05:28PM
* Moderation of "But, it's actually a strength, too" Saturday December 14, @05:30PM
* Reply to "Not the only problem" by orange7 Saturday December 14, @05:33PM
* Reply to "Oh, come off it" by archeopterix Saturday December 14, @05:34PM
* Reply to "But, it's actually a strength, too" by MeanMF Saturday December 14, @05:35PM
* Reply to "But, it's actually a strength, too" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @05:39PM
* Moderation of "You know what?" Saturday December 14, @05:40PM
* Reply to "Oh, come off it" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @05:41PM
* Reply to "Yeah, and America needs more weapons *sigh*" by RealSurreal Saturday December 14, @05:42PM
* Reply to "Yeah, and America needs more weapons *sigh*" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @05:46PM
* Reply to "Yeah, and America needs more weapons *sigh*" by the_2nd_coming Saturday December 14, @05:47PM
* Reply to "Yeah, and America needs more weapons *sigh*" by aggieben Saturday December 14, @05:47PM
* Reply to "But, it's actually a strength, too" by kasperd Saturday December 14, @05:48PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by g4dget Saturday December 14, @05:49PM
* Reply to "Yeah, and America needs more weapons *sigh*" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @05:49PM
* Moderation of "Yeah, and America needs more weapons *sigh*" Saturday December 14, @05:51PM
* Reply to "Yeah, and America needs more weapons *sigh*" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @05:52PM
* Reply to "Yeah, and America needs more weapons *sigh*" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @05:53PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by coloth Saturday December 14, @05:58PM
* Reply to "Yeah, and America needs more weapons *sigh*" by aardvarkjoe Saturday December 14, @06:00PM
* Moderation of "About the director" Saturday December 14, @06:06PM
* Moderation of "You know what?" Saturday December 14, @06:12PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by Ed Avis Saturday December 14, @06:20PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @06:21PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by coloth Saturday December 14, @06:23PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by El Pollo Loco Saturday December 14, @06:24PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by F2F Saturday December 14, @06:26PM
* Reply to "I always just "look" busy" by The Spoonman Saturday December 14, @06:28PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @06:29PM
* Reply to "The submitter is correct" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @06:31PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @06:33PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by Bicoid Saturday December 14, @06:36PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @06:38PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @06:41PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by g4dget Saturday December 14, @06:48PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @06:49PM
* Moderation of "What I'd major in" Saturday December 14, @06:55PM
* Reply to "The submitter is correct" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @06:57PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by GuySmiley Saturday December 14, @07:03PM
* Moderation of "I always just "look" busy" Saturday December 14, @07:11PM
* Moderation of "The submitter is correct" Saturday December 14, @07:13PM
* Moderation of "The submitter is correct" Saturday December 14, @07:13PM
* Moderation of "What I'd major in" Saturday December 14, @07:13PM
* Moderation of "What I'd major in" Saturday December 14, @07:17PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by Snafoo Saturday December 14, @07:41PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @07:44PM
* Reply to "It's a phone, people" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @07:47PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by Goalie_Ca Saturday December 14, @07:51PM
* Moderation of "Spielberg Over the Hill?" Saturday December 14, @07:52PM
* Moderation of "What I'd major in" Saturday December 14, @07:56PM
* Reply to "Spielberg Over the Hill?" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @07:56PM
* Reply to "Spielberg Over the Hill?" by garcia Saturday December 14, @07:56PM
* Reply to "Spielberg Over the Hill?" by fredrikj Saturday December 14, @07:58PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by furchin Saturday December 14, @08:00PM
* Reply to "Spielberg Over the Hill?" by VoidEngineer Saturday December 14, @08:01PM
* Moderation of "Not the only problem" Saturday December 14, @08:04PM
* Reply to "Spielberg Over the Hill?" by Monkelectric Saturday December 14, @08:07PM
* Moderation of "The submitter is correct" Saturday December 14, @08:07PM
* Reply to "Spielberg Over the Hill?" by xagon7 Saturday December 14, @08:22PM
* Reply to "Well duh" by Zork the Almighty Saturday December 14, @08:22PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by Hershmire Saturday December 14, @08:23PM
* Moderation of "Sick of reviewers, critics, skeptics, guides, etc." Saturday December 14, @08:27PM
* Reply to "Spielberg Over the Hill?" by Courageous Saturday December 14, @08:28PM
* Reply to "Sick of reviewers, critics, skeptics, guides, etc." by tomlord Saturday December 14, @08:30PM
* Reply to "Spielberg Over the Hill?" by RedWizzard Saturday December 14, @08:31PM
* Moderation of "But, it's actually a strength, too" Saturday December 14, @08:31PM
* Reply to "I always just "look" busy" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @08:35PM
* Moderation of "Spielberg Over the Hill?" Saturday December 14, @08:35PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by doug renfrew Saturday December 14, @08:38PM
* Reply to "I always just "look" busy" by TheLastUser Saturday December 14, @08:38PM
* Moderation of "Spielberg Over the Hill?" Saturday December 14, @08:39PM
Moderation of "The submitter is correct" Saturday December 14, @08:47PM
Moderation of "But, it's actually a strength, too" Saturday December 14, @08:50PM
* Moderation of "Sick of reviewers, critics, skeptics, guides, etc." Saturday December 14, @08:54PM
* Moderation of "Not a big fan of reviews" Saturday December 14, @08:58PM
* Moderation of "What I'd major in" Saturday December 14, @09:02PM
* Moderation of "The submitter is correct" Saturday December 14, @09:02PM
* Reply to "Sick of reviewers, critics, skeptics, guides, etc." by juuri Saturday December 14, @09:05PM
* Reply to "You know what?" by xombo Saturday December 14, @09:09PM
* Reply to "Spielberg Over the Hill?" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @09:19PM
* Moderation of "Well duh" Saturday December 14, @09:30PM
* Moderation of "Not a big fan of reviews" Saturday December 14, @09:45PM
* Reply to "What I'd major in" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @09:51PM
* Reply to "Spielberg Over the Hill?" by Chasuk Saturday December 14, @09:54PM
* Reply to "Well duh" by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @09:55PM
* Moderation of "Well duh" Saturday December 14, @10:30PM
* Moderation of "Spielberg Over the Hill?" Saturday December 14, @10:47PM
* Reply to "Sick of reviewers, critics, skeptics, guides, etc." by rootmonkey Saturday December 14, @11:07PM
* Reply to "Sick of reviewers, critics, skeptics, guides, etc." by Anonymous Coward Saturday December 14, @11:16PM
* Reply to "Well duh" by johnrpenner Saturday December 14, @11:18PM
* Moderation of "Spielberg Over the Hill?" Saturday December 14, @11:30PM

Re:Curious (I'm not a hardware guy) (4, Informative)

Toraz Chryx (467835) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892006)

Windows 2000 picks up one CPU with HT as two _real_ cpu's, XP/Pro detect it as a CPU with HT.

As such, Win2k needs double the number of cpu licenses (so for a dual processor HT Xeon box, you need the next version of Win2k up, with 4 processor support.)

Re:Curious (I'm not a hardware guy) (1)

stratjakt (596332) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892013)

W2K will support it too, last I read. TechTV was probably just putting a little advertising spin on it.

I watched about 5 minutes of the screensavers the other day where they gushed and ooed and awed over how cool XP Media Center edition is. And why it makes sense you cant get the OS seperate from the hardware - because its so complicated to put together a PC with VIVO ability that only bigtime oems can do it.

The first slashdot article... (0, Flamebait)

SoVi3t (633947) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891983)

...that totally bores me to tears. Nothing interesting, or debate worthy. May as well through this in the spam section, cuz that's what it seems like to me *plugs his nose and mouths P U*

Call me destructive, but... (1)

ackthpt (218170) | more than 11 years ago | (#4891984)

I don't think you've measured the maximum capacity of a PSU until you hear a BANG!

Nah, I hate to see electronics head for the landfill as much as the other guy. I picked up the PC Power and Cooling PSU they reviewed last time. It's doing a fine job and is quiet. Actually the loudest fan in the case is that tiny little stock AMD CPU fan, what a racket! Seems to keep the CPU cool enough (XP2600/333), but I'd like to know where I can get a quieter fan for the stock HS.

Why do people O/C now-a-days ? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4892007)

Back in mid 90's maybe, when a few extra MHZ actually meant something. I remember OC my 486DX4 for extra fps in Tie Fighter, but it seems pointless today with hardware so far outpacing software. I realize some people are hobbyists, but it really is a waste of power and reliabilty.

Re:Why do people O/C now-a-days ? (1)

stratjakt (596332) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892051)

I can think of 3 reasons to OC.

1) Buy older/cheaper hardware and make it more useful. Ie, people with P3 Tualitans running at 1.8 ghz. That's a noticable boost.

2) People who want to be past the cutting edge. These are the ones who buy a new 3.06 and O/C it - just to be ahead of the curve. This could have real advantages. If you encoded a lot of video/audio, did a lot of rendering, other such CPU intensive tasks.

Mostly, though, 2 goes hand in hand with 3:

3) To show off.

Personally, I don't O/C CPUs. I'd rather have my new 2.53 cpu last for 5-10 years (like the P100 I'm using as a router) than have it run at 2.8ghz for a year or two.

If my board would allow me, I'd even underclock the fsb by 10mhz or so to run cooler and last longer.

That said, I'm squeezing the last bit of life out of my older 1st gen Radeon card with a 25% overclock (as per item #1)

Re:Why do people O/C now-a-days ? (1)

ocaddict (634732) | more than 11 years ago | (#4899734)

Hey Strat. I'm sorry bro, but your 2.53 is going to be obsolete in way less than 5-10 years. I mean, 10 years? Are you even remotely serious? That's just ludicrous.
Also, just a quick note to all of you peeps that didn't like the hardware news bits post. Check the top of this site, it does say "News for Nersds".

Re:Why do people O/C now-a-days ? (2)

duren686 (463275) | more than 11 years ago | (#4900983)

Obsolete, maybe, but if he can still use it to play GTA3 in 10 years rather than having a melted wad of silicon on an equally melted motherboard, it's better.

Warning on mini hard drive encasements (4, Informative)

mcgroarty (633843) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892008)

There are quite a few of these mini hard drive cases available. Be careful if you're buying a USB2.0 one, however.

There are a few cheaper models which don't come with a power adapter, expecting to be powered off the USB bus. The thing is, they report their peak load demand to the system's USB power manager, which is the hard drive spinup wattage. This is higher than most USB power busses can deliver, and the result is a current over limit warning and the inability to use the drive.

The fun comes in, because several of these use nonstandard power jacks (and in at least one case, the model hasn't an external power jack at all). You'll be left modifying the case yourself, trying to find the nonstandard power adapter, or trying to find one of the cheaper USB 2.0 cards without limit protection.

Re:Warning on mini hard drive encasements (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4895769)

Or you could just purchase a USB hub with a power adapter, this should provide the extra power you need.

Re:Warning on mini hard drive encasements (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4895833)

Actually - most powered hubs have -less- power than USB hubs on motherboards, which rely on the PC's power supply.

Small problem with the article (1)

Ignorant Aardvark (632408) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892016)

Is it "bit" or "bite"? It doesn't make much of a difference, it's just that one's past tense and one's not. "I'll bite your new improved video card." "I bit your new improved video card back when it was good."

Overclocking is like juggling antique plates (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4892055)

Its risky, and expensive!

Oh God, please no!! (2, Offtopic)

johnthorensen (539527) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892060)

IMHO, this is not a story that I want to see on Slashdot. There are already 343,225,988,332,112 hardware sites (most seemingly run by 13-year-old computer prodigies that have a rough time spelling), ALL of which carry the same collection of heat sink and other "enthusiast" hardware reviews. Use of Slashdot's bandwith for such redundancy is unnecessary, unless it's all part of an evil scheme to take out all 343,225,988,332,112 sites by slashdotting...leaving Slashdot to take over... If this is the case however, I'd like to note that I'd rather read about ESR (!!!) than the latest in static-lump-of-copper-with-a-noisy-ass-fan-on-top technology.

-JT

RIGHT... YOU THINK "SEX TIPS FOR HOMOS" IS BETTER? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4892089)

Re:Oh God, please no!! (2)

hitzroth (60178) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892329)

"News for Nerds", friend. Since there's too many of these sites to sift through, having Slashdot pull a couple from the herd is nice every once in a while, and gives those of us who think this stuff is neat, but can't spend much time on it, an idea of what's going on.

Someone else mentioned creating an "Overclocking" or "Hardware Modding" topic so people could block if they want to. Maybe the editors would be interested in creating a referenced sub-topic structure for the stories. E.g. [computers>hardware>overclocking] and [computers>hardware>cooling] would be topic types for this story. But then Slashdot starts to turn into Everything2...

By the way, saying "IMHO" doesn't make arrogant statements humble. It doesn't even make them sound humble. It makes one who uses it sound like a jerk who can't courteously present a thoughtful opinion. And it's redundant: anything that's not referenced as fact should be taken as opinion.

Re:Oh God, please no!! (1)

johnthorensen (539527) | more than 11 years ago | (#4893260)

Good lord, chill out man. I was OK with what you said up to the final sentences, at which point your post degenerated to flame-level. IMHO means just that - and should represent to the reader the idea that "If you think otherwise, that's fine by me. This is just what I'm thinking, and I make no attempt to speak for the community as a whole." This is always my intent when I use that particular four-letter-word.

Any other ways you may take this, including making gross assumptions about what a jerk the author is, are your loss. IMHO, such assumptions have a jerk-like quality in and of themselves.

As with any thread I get involved in that goes flame...this will be my last post in thread. And to reinforce the "H" in "IMHO", I am chosing to forego my +1 Bonus. Have a nice day.

-JT

HTML error (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4892108)

missing </a> after HardOCP

Wow. (1)

Oliver Defacszio (550941) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892184)

Those 'heat spreaders' are completely useless! I know that a half degree can make a world of difference in the world of technology, but if your RAM is getting hot enough where that one-half degree actually means anything, may I suggest that you quit running memory benchmarking apps for ten straight hours?

The kid who wrote that 'review' tips his hand at the very end, as despite being good for nothing in an actual sense, these 'spreaders' offer a whole new 'look' for your computer. You know, that grey box that site under the desk all the time.

Oh, while I'm thinking about it, watch out for my review of those fancy new red-anodized muffin tins which, although offering nothing actually beneficial to the production of muffins, does provide a whole new look to the inside of your oven. Hurray!

Re:Wow. (1)

Echo_42 (634930) | more than 11 years ago | (#4906188)

to some looks matter. not everyone keeps their beige box under their desk all day long. some of us LAN every weekend with big crowds and like to show off our rigs and modding. Granted heat spreaders dont do much OC wise, but they can add a nice finishing touch to a themed/color coordinated case.

Very much cheaper pump relay "mod" (1)

GigsVT (208848) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892242)

Rather than wasting all that time and money, and opening up your PSU, you could just do this.

Buy a relay, one that is rated to switch the amps you need on the switching side at 120volts (or 240 if you are from a third world country :) ) Make sure the "coil" voltage is 5 or 12 volts.

Simply wire the coil side to your power supply's +5 or +12 and ground, and run the hot side of the power to the pump through the switching side.

Now, was that difficult? If you want it to delay when you turn it off, use a 5V relay and get a 1farad 5V super capacitor [allelectronics.com] (the kind they use for CMOS memory backup) and wire it in parallel with the coil side, noting polarity. This will hold the relay closed for quite a while when the power is turned off (up to a minute or two), assuming the coil on the relay has sufficiently high ohmage.

Total cost: About $4 in parts, and 10 minutes reading about ohm's law if you don't already know it.

Noise level (1)

k-hell (458178) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892274)

Anyone have experience with and/or links to tests regarding the noise level in VapoChill and water cooling kit systems?

Re:Noise level (2)

trentfoley (226635) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892568)

I've used the Ahanix Iceberg I water cooler system. The submersible pump is indeed almost silent. However, the fans that blow air through the radiator are not silent. The noise level was the same with my big heatsink/fan as with the reservoir/pump/heatsink/radiator/fan. That is... until the radiator sprung a leak (see my other post [slashdot.org] )

Water Cooled Systems. (3, Informative)

trentfoley (226635) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892360)

I am in the process of getting satisfaction from a vendor concerning a failed water cooler system. If you don't want to hear a rant, stop reading now.

I put an Iceberg I [ahanix.com] in my kids' Athlon XP 1900+ in the first part of September. It worked great for almost three months and then the heat exchanger (radiator) sprung a leak and fried my GeForce3 video card. I wrote that off since I was planning on upgrading it soon anyway. I also considered myself to be extremely lucky to have only lost something so easily replaced.

However, what burns me is the response I have received (or, lack thereof) from exoticpc.com [exoticpc.com] (where I bought the fscking thing). BTW, their website is not working for me in Mozilla right now, but Konqeror seems to work.

I originally emailed them telling them about the radiator leak and asked for a refund. They did reply the next day saying that they would not return my money. But, I was told that they would give me a new reservoir since I had apparently screwed mine in too tightly and ruined it -- which is not the case, the reservoir is not leaking.

They apparently didn't bother to even read my complaint. I made it clear that the problem was with the radiator, not the reservoir. Here is my original message:

I purchased this item on 09/03/2002 and installed it
as soon as I got it. It has been running great until now. The radiator
unit sprung a leak. Fortunately, all I lost was a video card which was due
for upgrade anyway. I would like to return the entire product for a refund
since I will not be using it again. I do not trust a replacement to be any
better. It was cool while it lasted :)
and, their reply:
Hi Trent,
Sorry to hear what happened to you. This is actually a rare occurence. This
problem only seems to occur when someone screws in the screws too tight and
the cracks form over time. Also, try to make sure the lid is screwed in
evenly so the top is level and not at an odd angle. This may also cause
cracks to form. Another precaution would be to use a regular screwdriver
instead of a power drill. We could send out a new reservoir to you, but
after 30 days there's no refund. Just let me know and I'll send a
replacement reservoir out to you, Trent.
At any rate, I then replied to their mail asking for a replacement heat exchanger or radiator or whatever you call it. It has been ten days since I replied to their mail and I have not received any response. I just sent off another email to exoticpc.com hoping that it will elicit a response. (in case this post doesn't ;) )

Thanks for reading. I feel a little better now.

Shuttle's heat pipe system (2)

Animats (122034) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892453)

I have one of those densely packed Shuttle breadboxes with the heat pipe cooler. One end is attached to the CPU, and the other is in front of the fan. Works fine so far. All the plumbing is metal; no plastic tubing.

This is probably one of the more practical uses of liquid cooling - the small-box desktop computer.

I use this box to run QNX, and use the stock motherboard VESA graphics. Putting in a heat-generating high end graphics board might create problems.

PSU Reviews (1)

kguilber (586327) | more than 11 years ago | (#4892550)

I don't know what kids review these power supply units, but wouldn't it be nice to see some kind of output graph to actually prove the delivered power is stable? I've seen this done for Enermax units and that is why I bought one. Seeing someone prove they can use a multimeter doesn't impress me, nor does it strengthen my faith in a product that powers expensive and sensitive electronics.

ANYONE here up on the AMD OPTERON 64 (2)

Archfeld (6757) | more than 11 years ago | (#4893021)

arch ? What would be a great article, is a little background and some information on it and the changes that will be coming, if such info can be had without an NDA violation...

Water Cooling (1)

silas_moeckel (234313) | more than 11 years ago | (#4893122)

OK Am I the only one that is thinging about water cooling with external connectors so the ratiator/fan assembly can go somewhere else? I was thinging a couple diversion valves and and car radiator/fan attached with some Pex one outside the house and one in the attic/basement to get the heat and more importantly noise away from the user. This seems a lot cheaper than my current cat5 KVM extentions and a long run for the speaker wires (ok it could just be one but I havent gotten around to a speaker set that takes coax spdif in) But I could get the only moving part in the PC down to the local hard drives and i could ditch those and netboot if I went to GigE to the server.

Taco's Continuing Irrelevance (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#4893159)

Mike Magee at The Inquirer gives us a hardware wibble around the web's tech sites several times a week. Taco is so fucking desperate to be relevant that he thinks he can just copy Mike's style & substance and nobody will notice. Well, taco, we do notice. And you build your reputation for irrelevance.

a point of confusion (1)

t14m4t (205907) | more than 11 years ago | (#4895070)

am I the only one that noticed this?


the article on overclocker cafe talks about a system that mounts into the case with strong magnets.


so, let me get this straight: you want to put MAGNETS next to HARD DRIVES?!?!


doesn't seem like a good idea to me...


weylin

You know you're a geek when... (2)

Sentry21 (8183) | more than 11 years ago | (#4896774)

Did anyone else read that as 'A Few Hardware Blts'? Maybe I've been coding too long...

--Dan

Last Post! (1)

alpg (613466) | more than 11 years ago | (#4978465)

The best equipment for your work is, of course, the most expensive.
However, your neighbor is always wasting money that should be yours
by judging things by their price.

- this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?