Dell Introduces Laptop With WUXGA 532
Cutie Pi writes "Dell has just released the Inspiron 8500, a new 15.4" widescreen notebook with a WUXGA screen--thats 1920x1200, high enough resolution to watch HDTV quality movies. Couple that with the new nVidia 64MB GeForce4 4200 Go (much faster than the ATI Radeon 9000), and you've got quite a notebook!! Can't wait to get my hands on one!"
Waiting... (Score:2)
Bigger fonts? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Bigger fonts? (Score:4, Informative)
Yeah, you can. Although my experience with Win2k (my laptop is XP and they MIGHT have fixed that) is that changing the font size can screw things up, especially web browsing. I've noticed that setting the fonts to larger can mangle table sizes on websites and break them. I've also noticed that text doesn't always fit in its buttons like the 'submit' button.
Also for me in particular, this is a problem because I bought my laptop to run Lightwave. The buttons on it are fixed-width fonts, and they do not respond to fonts designated by the Windows theme. I cannot change the font on it that I know of. So for me (I doubt a significant amount of people have this laptop and run Lightwave on it...) that's not an option.
Things might be different in XP, but I wouldn't count on it. Either the text will be the wrong size and break the page, or it'll be too small, thus defeating the purpose of it. Fortunately, I use Opera and it has a true magnification button instead of changing the font size.
Re:Bigger fonts? (Score:3, Informative)
Just for movies? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Just for movies? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Just for movies? (Score:2, Interesting)
It may be sharper, but it's going to be much smaller.
My coworker bought a Dell not too long ago that has a 15.0" screen with a screen resolution of 1600x1200 (for the purposes of software development, natch). It's very hard to read at more than a few inches.
On the other hand, I have a Gateway laptop with a 15.7" screen at its native 1280x1024. Now, I'll grant you that I can't cram the same amount of stuff on the screen as my coworker can. However, it's significantly easier to read my screen -- especially from more than a few inches -- that it is to read the screen on the other laptop.
Re:Just for movies? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Just for movies? (Score:2, Insightful)
Increase the font size on the other machine. A higher resolution gives you easier to read text. Period.
Pushing 1600x1200, especially with Cleartype really strains your CPU though.
Re:Just for movies? (Score:2)
Re:Just for movies? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Just for movies? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Just for movies? (Score:2)
Re:Just for movies? (Score:2)
Yeah, text. That's what geeks will use it for. And they read playboy just for the articles.
Aspect ratio of a brick... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Aspect ratio of a brick... (Score:2)
But, then again, I've become a brainwashed member of the apple cult, so I'm probably not the best judge of a laptop.
A great display (Score:2, Funny)
With a screen at that resolution, I just might be able to view an entire slashdot advertisement at once. Wow, no scrolling for me.
Re:A great display (Score:5, Insightful)
Who needs 1920x1200 on a 15" screen? yet we have to put up with 1280x1024 on 19" screens on the desktop...
Re:A great display (Score:3, Informative)
First, let's try a SONY 23" [dell.com]
Then, we have a Samsung 24" [samsungusa.com]
Of course we can't forget the Apple 23" [apple.com]
All rated at 1920x1200. Now, if you want cheap, Dell makes a FP2000 at 1600x1200 (20") that can usually be gotten for under 1000. Too bad they sell out faster than hot cakes.
Limits of DVI-D (Score:3, Informative)
See http://www.rell.com/pdfs/DSG_ssLCD-240t.pdf -- Maximum Digital Resolution: 1280x1024 @60Hz
Re:A great display (Score:3, Insightful)
I really don't understand why anyone would use a flat panel on the desktop. The cost per square foot saved doesn't come close yet to the cost of a square foot in an average home. And you can currently get 19" monitors capable of 2048x1536 for under $300. I have 3 such 19" monitors running at 1600x1200 each on my machine and can't see why anyone would settle for less. My 3 monitors + video cards cost less than a single 19" flat panel. And Ghost Recon at 2048x1536 is really cool :o)
By the way, I've found the trick to happiness with 19" monitors at high resolution is a horizontal dot pitch of around 0.22. Anything higher causes letters to have fuzzy edges. Its this that causes eyestrain, not the size of the text. The secret to easier reading is greater sharpness, not larger size. In fact, making the size larger greatly slows the reading because there is less text in the region of sharpest focus. Most of us read at least phrases if not sentences or paragraphs, not letters and words. If you can't see a whole phrase at once in focus, you have to revert to a more primitive word by word reading pattern.
Neat monitor, ugly notebook... (Score:2, Informative)
Apple's got the prettiest notebooks by far, with Sony and IBM the only credible alternatives IMHO.. Dell stuff just looks like Taiwanese junk..
Apple.. (Score:4, Funny)
Not quite (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm a huge apple fan but some of the most critical things I need to do for my company are either not available for Mac or are exponentially more expensive. BTW I develop software for Linux (2.2+), Windows (win32), Mac (OS X) and Solaris (7+). I have seen the 17" AlBooks at the Apple Store and while impressive it doesn't do much more for me than the old 15.2. If the 15.4 comes available for a decent price (see note) I'll get one as soon as they are available (not the lovely preannouncements Apple has been giving). Otherwise, I'll just get an old TiBook 1GHz for 2550 or so.
Note: the Dell with 2.4GHz proc, 512MB 1 DIMM, GF4 4200, 60GB, 1920x1200, Extra Battery,
Re:Apple.. (Score:5, Funny)
Slashvertisement (Score:2, Funny)
specs (Score:2)
Re:specs (Score:5, Funny)
I once beat a man to death in Reno* using nothing but a Dell laptop.
*just to watch him die
i own an 8200 (Score:4, Informative)
Dell sells a lot of stuff that's not ready for prime time - is the 8500 yet another example?
Re:i own an 8200 (Score:2)
Switching from the default Microsoft "Dell" to "Dell Mobile" driver stopped the constant crashing.
Then I just said to hell with it and switched to ATI, which is installed on my Mac.
Cut the FUD. (I also own an 8200) (Score:4, Informative)
My dad had bluescreen problems with his I8000 and obtained new drivers from *Windows Update* of all places. This was months ago.
I was using the latest Dell drivers from their website with no problems whatsoever. I don't think my 8200 has ever bluescreened even once.
And if you bothered to do ANY research at all, you would've found the D-Force (and related) modified INFs that are regularly maintained so that you can use your latest Detonator release with "Go" series of GeForces. Yes, I'm running the 41.09 Detonator release on my 8200 with full functionality.
BTW, Dell has some excellent user-to-user support forums if you go to their support website.
Oh yeah, and it runs Linux beautifully too.
Notebook != Laptop (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Notebook != Laptop (Score:2)
-B
Re:Notebook != Laptop (Score:2)
Right about now my 19" CRT monitor is looking mighty out-dated...I even prefer my 12.1" iBook screen because I can sit infront of it for hours on end programming away without the eye strain I get from my CRT (although I do run the CRT at 1600x1200 at 72 Hz since I really enjoy the desktop real-estate...)
Remember the first beta tester? (Score:2)
Ram Prices (Score:5, Interesting)
512MB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms
512MB,DDR,266MHz 1 Dimm [add $200.00]
640MB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $300.00]
768BM,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $400.00]
1GB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $650.00]
1.5GB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $1,800.00]
2GB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $3,300.00]
Re:Ram Prices (Score:2, Informative)
MacMall [macmall.com] gives you 512MB RAM free.
Of course, you have to pay the $39.99 'install fee', but look at what Dell wants for more RAM, or what it'd cost you to buy the memory from NewEgg/etc
On a side note - $39.99 to pop the keyboard off and stick a DIMM in?!
Re:Ram Prices (Score:5, Informative)
My only issue was, when I was running several application, I would notice a slow down. I would get frequent messages from XP stating that it was going to resize my pagefile.
Well, a week or so ago, I decided to check things out. Since I ordered my laptop with 128MB, Dell had set the pagefile to: minimum 128MB/maximum 384MB. Why they don't just leave it on auto is beyond me. But just be warned if you decide to go the route I went.
Re:Ram Prices (Score:3, Insightful)
Better be a short movie... (Score:4, Interesting)
Not good, I'd say...
Re:Better be a short movie... (Score:5, Funny)
On my first business trip, I found out that the battery was enough to watch about 66% of a DVD.
Later that year, I found out that my battery was being recalled, but they'd apologize by giving me two batteries in return -- double-Whee! Now I would have enough battery life to watch a full flick.
I just have to pop out the DVD drive to install the second battery.
GeForce4 Go, faster than what? (Score:5, Informative)
What's that? The poster must have meant the ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 [ati.com], which is much different from the Radeon 9000 Pro [ati.com] AGP card.
Re:GeForce4 Go, faster than what? (Score:3, Insightful)
The GF4 4200 go is simply the desktop chip with lowered clockspeeds. It's comparable to the Geforce FX, puts out way too much heat for the application, and introduced just for the purpose of taking the performance lead from a 6 month old design from ATI. I'm surprised that someone actually used this chip...
In a matter of days, ATI will release the M10, and nVidia will release nv31, both of which will offer better performance, support for directx 9.0 and have much lower power consumption...
Anyone who buys this will be stuck with a battery draining, hot running card that held the performance lead for a total of 1 month before superior designs appeared
my dell.. (Score:5, Informative)
If I had to do it all over again... (Score:5, Insightful)
In other words, I cant do a whole lot with it, and it's really heavy and awkward. My dad on the other hand, has a super small Sony Vaio that can go about 6 hours on a battery and still do everything I do, even though it's more underpowered.
Alienware (Score:2)
Review [alienware.com] is also very nice, though it is off of their own site. Customize your own here [alienware.com].
Suhit
Seems heavy (Score:2, Flamebait)
Inspirotion 15.4-inch Wide-Aspect SXGA+ and 15.4-inch Wide-Aspect UXGA display
Height: 1.52-inch (38.6 mm)
Width: 14.22-inch (361.2 mm)
Depth: 10.87-inch (276.1 mm)
Weight: 6.9 lbs. (2.96 kg) with travel module, battery and Harddrive. (Specs [dell.com])
Compared to the PowerBook G4 (17" model)
Height: 1.0 inch (2.6 cm)
Width: 15.4 inches (39.2 cm)
Depth: 10.2 inches (25.9 cm)
Weight: 6.8 pounds (3.1 kg) with battery and optical drive installed.
It seems that if Apple can make a laptop with a 17" screen that is 6.8lbs, Dell should be at least be able to get one that is lighter. (Specs [apple.com])
Re:Seems heavy (Score:2)
ostiguy
Re:Seems heavy (Score:2)
I think the original poster is trying to say that since Apple can make a 17" laptop light, Dell should be able to make their 15.2" one lighter (especially without a optical drive).
Dell, the leader in PC market share can't make a laptop as well designed as Apple's, thats the point.
Re:Seems heavy (Score:2)
Dell, the leader in PC market share can't make a laptop as well designed as Apple's, thats the point
Only if you ignore the real specs. I suggest reading my other post on the thread - the two are very comparable, but the Dell is about 20% less expensive.
Re:Seems heavy (Score:2)
Hey, I'm not trying to argue specs for specs (I've given up that long ago). I was just pointing out that the largest PC manufacturer is still trying to catch up with Apple (in terms of design).
I had to give up my ThinkPad a little while ago, and would love a lighter version of this laptop. I don't think I'll ever toss down the 5 grand for a TiBook, so the only thing holding me back on this laptop is weight and battery life.
Re:Seems heavy (Score:2)
Re:Seems heavy (Score:2)
I'm not sure why WXGA is so desirable in a laptop with a 15" screen. Perhaps some people have fantasies of watching HDTV content on a airplane, but it's not entirely clear how such content will get on to the laptop in the first place-- as, IIRC, there's no HD-DVD.
I suppose wou coulld copy a few gigs recorded on a desktop computer with a WinTV-Digital card, but it's still rather messy. Still, it's probably more practical than loading an DVS deck onto the airplane.
Re:Seems heavy (Score:2)
Re:Seems heavy (Score:3, Informative)
Of course, the Apple PowerBook G4 17" is $3299. Base (which includes a lot). A comparably configured Dell Inspiron 8500 (upgrade HD to 60GB, video to GF4Go, WUXGA video, 2 GHz CPU) is only $2657. And the Dell has a faster CPU (the 1 GHz G4 isn't going to beat a 2 GHz P4M in most tasks), more resolution (albeit a smaller screen), and a much, much longer standard warranty (3 years vs 1 year).
Oh, and yes, the Inspiron 8500 has 802.11b/g, standard. I don't think it has Bluetooth (the Powerbook does), but both have Gigabit ethernet and built-in modems. Both have CD-RW/DVD-R's, and half a gig of memory (upgradable on both). They're really pretty comparable as far as hardware goes. Which software you prefer is obviously up to you.
The Apple is lighter and (mostly) smaller. About the biggest difference is the height - 1" vs 1.5" is pretty major. The Apple is an inch wider, but that's probably not a big deal to most people.
clarifications (Score:2)
Very true, but keep in mind that the hardware will have to throttle down the P4M to less than 2 GHz for maximum battery life. The PowerBook can run at full speed without much impact. (Though the PB *can* throttle down for low-cpu tasks -- watching a DVD, etc -- for even longer battery life). Maybe a good laptop spec could be "number of cpu cycles per battery". In my experience, a laptop needs to be fast *and* have a long battery life.
The Dell, at the price you quoted, does not have a CDR-RW/DVD-R -- it only has a CDRW/DVD-ROM, it cannot record DVDs. The PowerBook can.
Re:Seems heavy (Score:5, Funny)
Apple: Weight: 6.8 pounds (3.1 kg) with battery and optical drive installed.
Interesting trick. The Apple weighs more if you use metric measurements!
Re:Seems heavy (Score:5, Funny)
Soooo....., the possibilities are narrowed. Fired NASA engineers either go to work for Apple, or Dell.
apple weight (Score:2)
The Apple is made from Aluminum -- skin, frame, and all.
The news is the screen... (Score:2)
If this notebook sounds heavy, just consider the weight of the alternatives. Personally, though, I'm happier than a bishop in amsterdam with my ASUS. Three thumbs up.
Re:The news is the screen... (Score:4, Funny)
Damn, I have to do something about this dyslexia. I thought you said "I'm happier than a bishop in amsterdam with three thumbs up my ASS."
It's going to be a while before I forget that thought.
1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen (Score:2)
Re:1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen (Score:3, Informative)
Going to look darned silly (Score:2, Funny)
Maybe I can get a headband-mount for it, that'll get the chicks to come a-runnin'.
Dell accessories (Score:5, Funny)
Ok, that's just cruel.
Re:Dell accessories (Score:5, Funny)
Resolution in Games (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Resolution in Games (Score:2)
Haven't yet seen anything that wouldn't run on the first double-click, anyway.
Re:Resolution in Games (Score:5, Informative)
Some support the native resolution (for example, I can play Civ III or Warcraft III on my 17" FP iMac in 1440x900). This is fantastic.
Some will keep the screen at native resolution and give you bars on the borders (for example, a 1024x768 box inside my 1440x900 screen). This isn't so bad. Also not so bad is linearly downscaling the screen a little bit -- it's not as blurry as you might think, at least not for me in MacOS X -- displaying an 800x600 box inside a 1024x640 screen, for example.
What's annoying is when the game runs fullscreen in a 4:3 resolution and stretches it. This is what Diablo II / LOD does, so it smears 800x600 out laterally to fill the screen. The OS refers to this as a "stretched" resolution and it looks awful. I play this game in windowed mode and reduce my resolution so that it is a window that nearly fills the screen, with my desktop peeking out the sides. Better.
Nearly all the flat panels I see nowadays are in strange resolutions or aspect ratios (my 17" studio display is 5:4 while my iMac is 8:5), and the persistence of companies that continue to try to slap a new acronym on it like FUGA or BARGA is laughable. Just publish the dimensions and resolution, please.
Neat and cool, but . . . (Score:4, Insightful)
This is a neat laptop, and I'm sure it would make a great desktop replacement, or even a good gaming laptop. That said, though, I can't bring myself to buy another Dell machine until they re-earn my trust.
The short version of the story is that I bought a laptop from them and tried to get it fixed under warranty. They failed to fix all of the problems when I sent it back, and failed to note the problems as unfixed. When I got it back, outside of warranty, with the problems unfixed, I called Dell, and Dell refused to fix them, saying that it was out of warranty. They did, however, fix the problems they caused while it was being repaired. When I got it back from the second repair, there was an additional problem, a cracked access panel. It took a good half-hour of arguing to get them to replace the panel. I did finally get them to fix the original problem, but it took a sternly-worded letter to senior management [barefootclown.net] to make it happen. That letter details several of the problems I've had with Dell over the years; it also contains the full version of this story.
Short answer is that I have lost my faith in Dell, and until they prove themselves to me again, I won't buy their products, and I advise other people to do the same, no matter now nifty-cool they may be.
Re:Neat and cool, but . . . (Score:2)
But they are cheap. That's why they are in business.
Re:Neat and cool, but . . . (Score:2)
Tech support insisted I ABUSED the network port. I tried to explain how insane that sounded, but they kept telling me to call this other number, to the department that does the repairs. Which I did, multiple times, no one ever picked up and I left at least 4 messages. No one returned my callsd. Two weeks later, out of warrenty, I get my laptop back, unrepaired. Thats just BAD customer relations.
Re:Neat and cool, but . . .BUT what will it take (Score:5, Insightful)
And just how do they prove themselves to you again if you won't deal with them?
I note that we have 5 Dells in our immediate family, including the 5 year old Dimension I'm typing this on. I've also worked closely with another dozen, and never had any problem with Dell service or support. I submit that your experience is not universal to all Dell owners.
WUXGA = Wide Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter (Score:2, Informative)
That's a lot of adjectives, and a whole lot
of pixel lovin'.
Re:WUXGA = Wide Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter (Score:4, Insightful)
Unfortutaly, in 3 years time, we will probably be seeing screen with XWDSUXGA (Extra-wide Double Super Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter) etc.
Battery Life (Score:2, Funny)
LATITUDE ? (Score:2)
We just purchased 6 Dell Latitudes where I work for field work (architectural). We chose them after much research on durability, continuity, stability. So far they are doing a very good job. It would be nice to see this display adopted into the Latitude series. For someone who does graphics, animation, CAD, etc this would serve as excellent work at home or field systems. Funny enough the reason we didn't choose an I book. was because you said it lack of compatbility with existing apps. AutoCAD, 3D Studio, Revit, etc.
retarded resolution names (Score:3, Insightful)
*bangs head against wall*
wouldn't you rather talk about 1600x1200 and the like?
802.11g (Score:2)
Great for gaming, but not mobile gaming (Score:5, Informative)
For me, I gave up laptop gaming a while back. It's just too expensive in the long run for worse peformance. I much prefer a Shuttle case, and a bigger LCD that still keeps my trips from the car to the party down to one. It's a bit more hassle with additional cables and such, but it's well worth it for the smaller hit on my wallet. For a top of the line gaming system last August, I spent about $1800, including a nice 18.1 inch LCD with the lowest response time on the market. The LCD can be had for about $300 less now, and the 9700 Pro is also cheeper then the $400 I paid at release. I also got more storage then can be crammed into a laptop at 120gb.
Anyhow, I dpn't see myself ever buying one of these. The laptops I own go for ultimate portability and ease of surfing the net wirelessly. If I want desktop power, I sit at a desktop.
*insert Apple comparison here* (Score:4, Interesting)
For all of you who say Apple is too much $$... (Score:5, Informative)
I speced one as close as I could to my 1GHz TiBook and it was the same price and the Dell did not include a SuperDrive equivalent.
So considering that the keyboard/mouse thingy has been replaced twice in my Dell Inspiron in 18 months, I think I will stick with my TiBook.
Looks like a nice machine other than the fact that I have seen too many Dell portables fall apart.
~150dpi (Score:2)
ps
I am assuming the widescreen is 16x9 and the 15.4 inch is the diagonal measurement. But the numbers are almost the exact same for a 4x3 screen (~155 horizontal)
pps
(16x)^2+(9x)^2=15.4^2 => x ~=
(4x)^2+(3x)^2=15.4^2 => x~= 3 => 12inch by 9inch
Do they call you the customizer? (Score:4, Funny)
And if I was, I'd have found this information myself.
BTW, I'm trying to sell an old waterbed. Do you mind if I stick a flyer up on the homepage? Thanks.
Thinkpad (Score:3, Informative)
same here! (Score:3, Interesting)
Sunny Dubey
compare the pics... (Score:5, Funny)
Inspiron 8500 [dell.com]
PowerBook G4 [webshots.com]
I know, I know... it's just the bottom of the machine, but you gotta love style.
$3,277 (Score:2, Interesting)
Now I can get a Shuttle SB51G case for ~325, a 3.06 GHz P4 for $548, 2x512MB DIMMS for $88 [total], and a Built by ATI Radeon 9700 Pro for $320, total = 1281.... mind you I still need HDD, Display, and CD-ROM drive, but can I manage to rack up another 2K for that? Especially if upgrading and using my old CD-ROM, Display, and HDD???
Don't get me wrong, I love Dell; I think they typically make superior PC's/Servers&Notebooks. But, is portability at the sake of performance, and that whopping price tag worth it???
WUGXA? (Score:3, Funny)
Call me back when you have an Awooogah screen.
I want to use it on my submarine.
A laptop with wuxia? (Score:2, Funny)
So when do we get widescreen desktop monitors? (Score:5, Interesting)
Widescreen is nice. The Mac world proves that.
So, why aren't the PC makers and monitor vendors come out with 16:9 displays and give everyone a reason to upgrade?
jonathan
Is it me or... (Score:4, Interesting)
At least teh old inspirions.. standard black.. with the wildly overprice clip on color pads.. were neutral looking. It was black.. it went with anything. Now these things area light blue and odd shade of gray. Seems like colors you'd have as baby-shower decorations than on a laptop.
Laptops are a fashion statement.. if your gonna be lugging one into your local starbucks it better not be an eye-sore. I looks like they cut the side off some old computer cases and formed them to a laptop case.
The laptop I will get next will need to be power efficient and powerful(not so concerned about weight).. But if I have to pick i'll choose mroe power than power efficiency. Thats why i've got hopes for Centrino.. or some variant with the Pent-M
This laptop is neither of my requirements.. and its an ugly monster to-boot
Dell equipment is cheap (in the nasty sense) (Score:3, Interesting)
I've had the misfortune to have two Dell laptops (Inspiron 7000 back in '99, Latitude C840 presently). They were not my choice - work machines. Both have been heavy, cheaply made junk. The Inspiron had multiple hardware repairs before I got rid of it (screen failure, memory, casing). The current Latitude is only 5 months old and the hard drive crapped out last week. It takes the patience of Job to deal with Dell Support, particularly when you are an IT professional and you already know what is wrong! It only took 3 days to argue the drive replacement out of them.
Also I'm not sure why Dell bother putting Nvidia graphics adapters in these 'high-end' laptops. Check out the most recent update available for the Geforce 4 440 Go drivers for the Lat C840 (v28.35 anyone?).Umm... No thanks (Score:3, Funny)
Dell should of produced a 17in 1440-900 laptop like Apple. That'd be a hell of a lot cooler.
Uphill both ways in the snow (Score:3, Funny)
Oldmanrant
I used to carry a Mac SE with a jerry-rigged hard drive home every night from work on the train. The damn thing was 35 pounds by the time it was in the bag.
I was happy when we switched to the Compaq Portables. Happy, I tell you!
Oh yeah, we ate sand.
/Oldmanrant
Re:...you got quite a notebook. (Score:3, Interesting)
Ditto
check out http://www.dynamism.com. Japanese laptops with a US warranty.
The sharp MM1 looks sweet, and it doubles as a USB2 hard drive.
Cheers,
prat
Oh yeah. (Score:3, Interesting)
FWIW, an IBM salesdroid I talked with a few months ago said they might ship linux on their laptops this year. We'll see. Nobody's getting my money if I have to send a portion to Redmond, too.
Just gimme a friggin' laptop without Windows on it! [OK, at a reasonable price, Apple-boy.
I second that! (Score:2)
Re:Laptop with WUXGA? (Score:2)
OR
You're soaking in it!
Now with twice the WUXGA! It's WUXGAriffic!