Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Buying a New TV?

Cliff posted more than 11 years ago | from the every-house-has-to-have-one dept.

Television 162

Bob Bitchen asks: "I have had the current TV set for 10+ years and really haven't put any thought into a new one. The current set is having some problems and I'm thinking of getting a new larger set or possibly a projector, with a budget of $1000. What's the best thing to get these days? HDTV ready might be nice but it's not mandatory. I don't know enough about the projector technology to feel comfortable about buying them but I might be convinced, if I hear from enough converts. Do the projectors perform as well as conventional displays? If I do go with a conventional display TV, what models are preferred and why? I am also looking for some good sites for comparing and learning more about the current state-of-the-art in televisions. I found a good site for projectors but haven't found a similar site for TVs."

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Keep your current TV, and go on vacation... (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6641749)

$1000 ? Gee whiz, wish I had that much to waste.

Keep your current TV, use your $1000, and do something more worthwhile.

I've seen Airfare to Vietnam from San Francisco for $300, roundtrip, and 1 week vacations in China for $1000. Why not go on vacation and have experiences you'll remember for the rest of your life, instead of blowing it on television, most of which you won't be able to remember next week...

Semi-OT: Don't whine. Do something about it. (4, Funny)

i_am_nitrogen (524475) | more than 11 years ago | (#6641847)

While I sympathize with your economic situation, usually 17 year olds living in their parents' basement aren't supposed to have $1000 to spend on a TV. Okay, so I'm 19, and I'm about to move out, and I already own a complete home theater including DLP projector.. but that's not the rule. Just because you don't have $1000, doesn't mean you should complain someone else does. There is a remedy to your situation. If you are unemployed, take a job at the supermarket. If you have a crappy job, learn new skills in your spare time so you'll have a way to pitch yourself to a new employer. If you really are 17 and living at home, stop complaining. Otherwise, make your life better.

Anyhow, how do you know the guy hasn't already been to China? A TV will last 10 years or more. A 1 week vacation to china will last 1 week, but those intenstinal parasites you'll carry around for a lifetime. Or, you could get SARS. I bet that's why airfare's so cheap.

Re:Semi-OT: Don't whine. Do something about it. (-1, Flamebait)

dotgod (567913) | more than 11 years ago | (#6641862)

He's not complaining that he doesn't have 1000 dollars, he's complaining because the guy is being a typical wasteful american.

Re:Semi-OT: Don't whine. Do something about it. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6641982)

You took the words right out of my mouth. Rock on!

Re:Semi-OT: Don't whine. Do something about it. (2, Insightful)

Danse (1026) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642305)

If he'd rather have a TV than a trip to Timbuktu, then how is that being wasteful? Maybe we should analyze all of your purchases to see if you're buying things that we think are wasteful.

Re:Semi-OT: Don't whine. Do something about it. (1)

Carpathius (215767) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644116)

Ok, this is ridiculous.

A 'typical wasteful American'. He's got a ten year old telvision that's having some problems. He's not talking about going out and buying a top of the line set -- he's not even talking about spending money on a moderately sized rear screen projection television. He's talking about a reasonably priced medium level television.

Maybe he doesn't like to travel. Maybe he doesn't have time to travel. Maybe he has a wife and four kids and the low fare suddenly gets rather expensive. (Not to mention that airfare is usually one of the cheapest parts of the trip. Priced hotels, rental cars, and restaurant food lately?)

This guy asked a simple question, and he gets slammed because he wants to replace a ten year old television. Why can't people just answer or not answer the guy instead of making unwarrented assumptions about what he's like.

In other words, play nice kids.


Re:Semi-OT: Don't whine. Do something about it. (0, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6642059)

Okay, so I'm 19, and I'm about to move out, and I already own a complete home theater including DLP projector.. but that's not the rule

Look bucko, in your wealthy world, maybe every 19 year old has his own home theater system. But out here in the rest of the world, mom and dad don't pay our bills anymore, we go to school, get a good education, work our ass off, get laid off, and still find ways to pay the rent.

I'm also aware at the completely materialist & wasteful additude of alot of slashdotters. Some poor young SOBs SOB worked their ass off so you could have that Television which you don't need. Good to know your priorities are in order.

You're obviously a rich kid who doesn't hasn't spent much time on his own, otherwise you wouldn't be talking like that. You probabably couldn't survive a week without help from mommie & daddy. You'll be weened, and that's good, but watch your additude.

A TV will last 10 years or more. A 1 week vacation to china will last 1 week

It's the memories that last a lifetime, dipshit. Obviously you haven't had many life moments worth remembering, or you'd realize that. PERHAPS YOU'RE WATCHING TOO MUCH TELEVISION.

but those intenstinal parasites you'll carry around for a lifetime. Or, you could get SARS. I bet that's why airfare's so cheap.

Actually, that IS why the airfare is so cheap, because chickenshits like you don't understand that your risk of getting SARS is close to nothing. Intestinal parasites? Wash your hands, eat cooked food from clean places and you'll be fine. If not, usually some antibiotics will do the trick.

Re:Semi-OT: Don't whine. Do something about it. (1)

jwilloug (6402) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642493)

Yeesh, we don't know anything about this guy's finances, maybe he can afford to buy the TV and still go to China afterwards. We didn't all lose our jobs when the bubble burst, there are still people for whom a thousand dollars is not a life changing amount of money.

I may look wistfully back at the days when my stock options were worth a couple of extra zeroes, but I bet I spend a fair bit more than that when I finally go buy a new TV (been meaning to for years, I bought a half decent Sony a few days after graduation just to have something other than the 11" deal that lived in my bedroom through college), and I won't have to live on Raman to do it. And if we can't talka bout expensive geek toys on Slashdot, where can we?

Re:Keep your current TV, and go on vacation... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6641995)

I've seen Airfare to Vietnam from San Francisco for $300, roundtrip

Health insurance doesn't cover vaccinations required for leisure trips. It costs a lot more to travel out of the US to Asia then $1000 when you account for all the other fees. Then, when you get back you'll still have to spend something on entertainment. $1000 isn't much to spend on a time-sink that will last for 10+ years. Besides, it's probably good for you to be a couch potato once in a while. Let's face it; even at $1000, a television is cheap entertainment compared to travel.

Re:Keep your current TV, and go on vacation... (0)

csoto (220540) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644646)

Yes, but $1000 can buy a lot of cheap booze and hookers!

In other words, 'Quit your Bitchen" (1)

CaptainCap (194813) | more than 11 years ago | (#6646117)

You're off-topic AND you passed up a stupid pun

Words to live by... (1)

psyconaut (228947) | more than 11 years ago | (#6641761)

..."can't go wrong with a Sony".

Obviously try-before-you-buy, but my 5 year old Sony is still a great, great TV.

Personally, I'd be wary of HDTV until it shakes down a bit more...but that's just me.


Re:Words to live by... (1)

sirmikester (634831) | more than 11 years ago | (#6641820)

try buying one of their mp3 players... DRM hell :( So in that case you can definately go wrong with a sony. BUT in terms of TV sets, they are definately the best. Go with a Sony if you have 1000 bucks to spend.

Re:Words to live by... (1)

psyconaut (228947) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642076)

Not going to argue with that....I can't speak for the rest of their product range, only really TVs.

Re:Words to live by... (1)

i_am_nitrogen (524475) | more than 11 years ago | (#6641908)

I have a 20" Mitsubishi TV from the late 80's that's fallen 4 feet twice and 6 feet once, and is still going without any repairs, except for one button on the front panel and the tuner doesn't stop on channels (happened when somebody spilled water in it). Oh, and the CRT is dislodged. But it still freaking WORKS!!! It's used as a monitor for the Playstation2 now. Sony might be good, but I don't know if they're the best.

Re:Words to live by... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6642055)

I've got to agree! I have a similar Mitsubishi from about late 80's or early 90's. Looks about like this [] . The thing is freaking awesome. It's still running great! (knock on wood)

Re:Words to live by... (1)

SuDZ (450180) | more than 11 years ago | (#6645492)

How are you routinly abusing this TV so much. I mean three falls, water and missing buttons? Sheesh.


Re:Words to live by... (2, Funny)

Bistronaut (267467) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642041)

..."can't go wrong with a Sony".

Unless you have to carry it up stairs. Sony makes their TVs out of solid depleted Uranium! Make sure you have a dolly!

Re:Words to live by... (3, Funny)

psyconaut (228947) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642086)

Story for you (like you care!) ;-)

My current Sony weighs 98lbs. Sounds like nothing. I mean, I can quite comfortably hump a 98lb girl all night ;-)

BUT.....when I bought my Sony, I didn't take the dealer up on the free delivery....we removed it from the box and I hauled it by myself into the car....and out when home...across the drive...and up the stairs. FUCK ME! It was a long haul. Sony make TVs that are not move-friendly. 98lbs doesn't sound much until you have to do what I did and realize that it has no FREAKIN' HANDLES! ;-)


Re:Words to live by... (1)

mosch (204) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642468)

You think that's bad? I did the same thing... found a great deal on a floor model Panasonic 34" TV... They said they couldn't ship it for a few days, so I called a friend and promised beer. The damned TV was 170 pounds, all of it on the screen side, all of which made it want to flip onto it's side, a lot.

I'm still not sure how the hell we didn't earn the tagline 'hilarity ensues'.

Re:Words to live by... (1)

Laplace (143876) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642650)

For $10 you could have gone to U-Haul and rented a dolly. Mechanical advantages are cool!

Re:Words to live by... (1)

erasmus_ (119185) | more than 11 years ago | (#6646313)

Did you not read the post? He actually turned down free delivery from the dealer, making his efforts even more useless.

Re:Words to live by... (3, Funny)

Anonvmous Coward (589068) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642677)

" I can quite comfortably hump a 98lb girl all night ;-)"

Gravity's not exactly a constant in dream land, buddy. ;)

Re:Words to live by... (1)

Thu Anon Coward (162544) | more than 11 years ago | (#6645134)

98lbs doesn't sound much until you have to do what I did and realize that it has no FREAKIN' HANDLES! ;-)

but the 98lb girlfriend does, in multiple locations, and she can hold on to you to help "stabilize" the position you are in :)

Re:Words to live by... (2, Funny)

splattertrousers (35245) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642089)

"can't go wrong with a Sony"

More than half of the Sony devices I've had have been complete crap. But the other half have been pretty darn good. Very strange.

Re:Words to live by... (2, Informative)

Professor Bluebird (529952) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642701)

..."can't go wrong with a Sony".
Sony is a **AA member. So show your support for DRM by buying their stuff

Re:Words to live by... (1)

innosent (618233) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642730)

Yeah, the Sony Wega's are absolutely the best tube TV's there are for picture quality, if I had paid more than I did for my TV, I'd have bought a 36" Wega. Personally, I have a 34" NetTV Multi-Media monitor (no TV tuner, just 2 VGA (800x600 max), 2 component (R,G,B coax connectors), and 2 component audio/video/S-video. Picture is great, but I think that' probably outside your price range, since they run about $1700. Check county auctions though, I got mine from an auction for $80, after a school stopped using it.

Of course, if you have a good home theater set-up, I'd go with a projector, probably something off ebay. You just can't beat a 20 foot diagonal screen. If you have a working TV already, and one that's a decent (26"+) size, I'd say get a small, low height TV stand, set your current TV on that, mount a projector on the ceiling, and put the screen above the TV. That way, you've got both, so even if your projector isn't bright enough for something, you can use that, and for movies, you have the projector.

Re:Words to live by... (2, Interesting)

trikberg (621893) | more than 11 years ago | (#6643588)

The first thing I thought when reading the OP was "Don't buy Philips, don't buy Sony". And of course the first post recommends a Sony. I don't have any first hand experience of Sonys because I avoid buying them due to the high number of people complaining about their poor quality. I think their TVs may be a little better than the usual products, but I still avoid them. Based on the Sonys I've seen on display in shops I also dislike their picture quality. Although the source signal usually stinks and the settings are probably way off, it's still an indication of quality. Go check out some TVs in a few stores before you buy anything. bring your own DVD and have them hook it up so you know what it's supposed to look like.

Instead I would recommend a Panasonic. Mine is almost 10 years old but has not never shown any signs of old age and the image quality is still excellent. It also does both NTSC and PAL which is great for overseas DVDs. The only downside is that it's only got 2 scart connectors and only one of them handles RGB. Make sure you have enough connectors on the device you buy.

Before buying anything play around with the remote in the store. This is the UI of the TV and you should be able to use it comfortably with one hand without looking at it. I've seen some astonishingly assinine remote control desings. This is one of the reasons that I will never buy anything made by Philips. The other is that their VCRs are legendary for breaking down. Usually very soon after the warranty expires.

Re:Words to live by... (1)

Micro$will (592938) | more than 11 years ago | (#6646465)

I have a Panasonic 20" TV/VCR combo that decided to become a black and white 2 weeks after the warrantee expired. My Phillips/Magnavox 27" runs fine after 5+ years now, crappy remote and all. Besides, my TV is always set to composite input, and the volume is done through the home theater so I only need the power button, which is taken care of by the remote for my cable box, which conveniently has one big red button that turns all my devices on or off.

Caveat sony (1)

n1ywb (555767) | more than 11 years ago | (#6645165)

I've had a real mixed bag of experiences with Sony products. My Sony monitor was a total piece of shit. Good tube, but shitty electronics. And my walkmans and discmans never seemed to last. On the other hand I've been very happy with my Sony VEGA TV. I think the thing I like best is the special 16:9 mode, where it compresses the scanlines vertically, so you can watch your movies in wide-screen mode without losing any vertical resolution. Pretty nifty.

Go buy a ordinary TV (1)

figleaf (672550) | more than 11 years ago | (#6641765)

HDTV is not worth spending you money right now [] .
Look at the GE TVs. They are cheap and will last until HDTV standards are stabilized.

Don't go buy an ordinary TV (3, Interesting)

i_am_nitrogen (524475) | more than 11 years ago | (#6641875)

HDTV standards are stabilized. HDTV is awesome. All stations in my area broadcast digital SDTV or better. I'd recommend an HDTV tuner card in an HTPC, with a projector. It'll be a little bit more than $1000, but the improved screen size and picture detail over a conventional TV are definitely worth it.

If you're buying a TV now, unless your room is very small, it's definitely worth going for a projector or an HDTV capable set, if it's within your budget. Generally, if you do the ceiling mount and screen yourself (which even the most well-monied individuals can enjoy doing as a refreshing change), a mid-range projector will cost less than HDTV tubes, plasmas, and RPTV's. I personally use an XGA DLP projector, and while the rainbows (it's an older DLP model; newer ones are much better) were mildly annoying at first, I'm very satisfied with the purchase.

Standards vs. Implementation (2, Interesting)

Detritus (11846) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642826)

The ATSC standard may be stabilized but the receivers are still a work in progress. Most of them have problems with sensitivity, multipath and software bugs. Receiver designs are still in flux. The biggest problem is how to cope with dynamic multipath. There are locations that receive strong ATSC signals where no commercially available receiver can successfully decode the signal.

HDTV - Check availability, and buy if you can (2, Interesting)

Andy Dodd (701) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644029)

Check to make sure that you're in an area with decent HD coverage.

This is pretty much any major metropolitan area except for NYC (Due to 9/11 knocking out all but one of the HD transmitters there.)

If you have a signal, HD is well worth it. Note: Even without an HD signal, an "HD-ready" TV with composite inputs can make for an AMAZING PC monitor for gaming, etc. In my case, I don't have an actual HDTV, I just feed my 18" LCD on my desktop using an HDTV tuner card in my PC. Sadly, I live in the NYC area which means only CBS and Fox for the time being.

The picture quality is worth it, even if you only use a PCI HDTV card and a good PC monitor. If you like CSI, think SERIOUSLY about getting HD, you don't know what you're missing out on until you've watched CSI in 1080i HD.

Re:Go buy a ordinary TV (2, Interesting)

tackaberry (694121) | more than 11 years ago | (#6643949)

HDTV is amazing, but you obviously have to have enough HD programming/signal to justify its cost.

Pre-9/11, we were able to receive Over-the-air broadcast of local network station from the WTC. After those broadcast facilities were destroyed Local HD dropped off. You can get several channels from Satellite: DirecTV offers HBO, Showtime, Discovery, HDNet, ESPN. Cable providers have varied service. We now have TWCNYC, which carries HBO, Showtime, PBS plus CBS, NBC, ABC.

In anycase, with a $1,000 budget HDTV is probably out of your range. I know a lot of people who have raved about their Sony WEGA's. I've also had pretty good luck with Samsungs. LCD's (Sharp Acquos) are nice, but too expensive as well (unless you want a little tv for the kitchen).

My opinions... (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6641766)

OK, stay away from the "Dick Tracy"-style of wristwatch TV...they aren't good and there is no place to plug in cable.
Also, colour is now available so you don't have to see everything in black and white.
Make sure you get one with more than 13 channels...somebody told me there is more.
Remember to pay your license fee that you MUST do if you own & watch the tele.
Use rabbit ears to pick up stations a long distance away (called "DX"), but don't use real rabbits or else the blood will obscure your view of the tube.

Thanks for listening.
Thomas Farnsworth

Re:My opinions... (1)

Paul d'Aoust (679461) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642704)

all right, my lingering question after reading all these posts is this: what the hell is a "TV"? I mean, what do the initials even stand for? I think we have something called a "television" in one of the rooms in our house, but its use has been supplanted by a more stable technology called "the outdoors".

Re:My opinions... (1)

daveewart (66895) | more than 11 years ago | (#6645025)

Remember to pay your license fee that you MUST do if you own & watch the tele.

Erm, in the UK, that's not funny - that's what we have to do.

Me personally... (1, Insightful)

Anonvmous Coward (589068) | more than 11 years ago | (#6641774)

.. I'd spend maybe $200-$300 for a TV and the rest on a sound system + TiVo.

Not sure if that gives you much to think about, but considerations are always good. :)

Re:Me personally... (3, Funny)

MBCook (132727) | more than 11 years ago | (#6641822)

I agree with this. Get a great regular TV for $200-$300 and then get other things with the rest of the money. Use it to pay down a credit card. Get ahead on your home loan. Go on vacation. Spend some of it on a TiVo (you can't go wrong, but you can always return it if you don't like it (I know, not possible)). I'd say don't go buy a HDTV, wait a few more years for everything to settle down. And look into repairing your TV. It could give you years more service for only $50. Of course, if it's much more than $100 just get a new TV.

But definatly get a TiVo. DirecTiVos are especially great.

Tee Eye Vee Ooooooh (3, Interesting)

fm6 (162816) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642392)

Spend some of it on a TiVo (you can't go wrong, but you can always return it if you don't like it (I know, not possible)).
Well, you can go wrong -- TiVo's have a high failure rate. There are two things you can do to avoid making this a problem:
  • Don't buy it over the Internet. If you do and it dies, you'll waste months fighting with the support people for TiVo and for whatever label you bought it under. Instead, go to a local merchant and make sure there's an understanding that you can get a replacement unit right away if the first one dies.
  • Get an extended warrantee. I usually consider this a ripoff (if your gadget is reliable, an EW is a bad value, and if it isn't, why are you buying it?), but for a Tivo this actually makes sense.
Also, note that a Tivo's price doesn't include a subscription, even though the device is pretty useless without one. A lifetime subscription is a better value (it costs less than 2 years of the monthly subscription) but there *are* those hardware issues...

If you're lucky, nothing will go wrong and your enjoyment of TV will go up drastically. (Tivos aren't just convenient, they're wonderful for digging up shows you always meant to watch, or would want to watch if you'd ever heard of them.) If you're not lucky, the damn thing will go psychotic. Which is survivable, if you're prepared for it.

Re:Tee Eye Vee Ooooooh (1)

Zathrus (232140) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644220)

And exactly what do you base this on?

TiVo's do not have a high failure rate. Of the 11 TiVo's owned by friends and family only one has had issues -- the modem blew out due to a power surge. An issue which has been largely resolved in the newer TiVo's, and is completely irrelevant with the S2 TiVo's if you use broadband connections. It can also be worked around by using an external modem.

And neither TiVo's financial reportings nor the TiVo Community boards bear out your alleged "high failure rate".

TiVo's are little more than a PC with some specialty hardware and a lot of specialty software. The hardware is all integrated circuits, a power supply, and a HD. The only mechanical systems there are the fan on the PS and the HD. Neither have particularly high failure rates, and the HD's actually appear to have much lower failure rates than one would expect from consumer grade IDE drives -- there are still tons of S1 TiVo's running with their original HD's out there, dating back to the late 90's. Oh, and if either one of these does fail, it's pretty trivial to replace it and keep on going.

If you're not lucky, the damn thing will go psychotic

What lovely terminology there... care to explain yourself? Right now it's just sounding like more BS.

TiVo's biggest downsides are the cost (esp. for the subscription) and the perceived lack of features (as compared to something like MythTV). Whether or not the cost bugs you is obviously a personal choice. As for MythTV/FreeVo -- completely different markets being served. MythTV/FreeVo is for people who like to hack and twiddle and stuff. TiVo is for people who just want things to work and do a job well.

Re:Tee Eye Vee Ooooooh (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6645479)

What lovely terminology there... care to explain yourself? Right now it's just sounding like more BS.

Man, you sound like a real jerk. Do you always talk to people like that, or just feel like you can get away with it because you're not f2f?

Come on man, whether or not your right -- don't talk to people like they're assholes. They probably don't deserve it.

--Jerk Police

Re:Tee Eye Vee Ooooooh (1)

etcshadow (579275) | more than 11 years ago | (#6645946)

Yeah, I ordered mine online (via my local cable company) and it arrived completely dead. After an interesting hour and a half trying to convince their lovely level 1 tech that it was, in fact, broken, I had to go through a pain in the ass process to send it back. It took about two months for them to send me a new one. Fuckers.

Also, the service is not all that stellar. Considering how much you pay for the subscription service, which consists of nothing more than a channel-guide (oh, and annoying ass *extra* commercials, too... gotta love those), you'd think they could get the channel guide right. For crying out loud: I'm set to record new episodes of "Monk" which USA lovingly reruns 15 times a week. For some reason my channel guide lists every rerun of "Monk" as a new episode... so I've got to be vigilant about deleting them or else my tivo will fill up.

That and the nickel-and-dime bullshit about "home media option"... translation "if you want to access this networked computer with your other networked computers... pay up!"

Makes me sad sometimes that I was an early-adopter, seeing all the cool new DVRs coming down the pike.

Projectors (2, Informative)

ColaMan (37550) | more than 11 years ago | (#6641806)

It all depends with projectors on the amount of time you'll spend with it on - they do have a limited bulb life, and the bulbs are expensive to replace.

A conventional (tube) TV set can run for many thousands of hours without any appreciable drop in output / quality. Most projectors have a 2000 hour bulb life (or less).

There! That's my share of FUD against projectors done! Please feel free to correct me if you think differently ;-)

Re:Projectors (3, Insightful)

i_am_nitrogen (524475) | more than 11 years ago | (#6641926)

Well, if you amortize the cost of a bulb over the bulb's life, I think it's worth the 30 cents an hour for a 110" diagonal screen with 1024x768 progressive resolution. If you just have friends over frequently, and have each one donate a dollar to your "bulb fund," you can easily cover the costs.

An important question though:

are you buying this to watch TV frequently for long periods of time? In other words, do you have kids who watch the afternoon cartoons every day? Projectors are better used in situations where you watch maybe an hour or two a day average, and mostly focus on high-quality content, like DVD's (or DVHS) and DTV.

Re:Projectors (1)

uradu (10768) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644087)

> If you just have friends over frequently, and
> have each one donate a dollar to your "bulb fund"...

you will leave a bad taste in their mouth and won't have said friends for much longer. Jeez, do you also charge for the chips-n-dip?

No FUD there bud! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6642165)

A know bulbs that blow up after a mere 1500 hours.

That's 250 days at 6 hours a day. And you'd probably want to stockpile a bunch of bulbs because:

1) You wouldn't be able to find any bulbs anywhere to buy.
2) even if you do find a source of bulbs they will want to extort the money out of ya.

Further FUD to consider:

1) You need a good wall to project onto. When you move houses this might be a problem.
2) The fans on them can be quite noisey.
3) You really need to hang them from the ceiling.
4) You might need to run a long video cable to the projector, and so end up with signal loss issues.
5) All your idiot friends will make up shadow puppets.

Re:Projectors (1)

Fat Cow (13247) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642551)

maybe a crt projector solves both problems

damn (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6641828)

I can't imagine spending $1000 on a monitor that doesn't even come with a mouse or keyboard.

I suggest putting $1000 into your IRA instead!

You don't say how about Samsung? (2, Informative)

MightyTribble (126109) | more than 11 years ago | (#6641859)

They do a nice 30" HDTV-ready 16:9 ratio unit for a little over $1,000, I think it's the 3096 / 3097 / 3098 model numbers, but they may have changed. Cambridge Soundworks usually has one set up in their stores. If you already have a surround-sound system, get the *97 (2 tuner, more home theater tweaks than the *96, but without the built in sub-woofer, which you won't be needing).

But really, so long as you're not being dirt cheap, you can't go too far wrong with a Sony Wega.

Re:You don't say how about Samsung? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6642080)

a word of warning (3, Insightful)

kommakazi (610098) | more than 11 years ago | (#6641911)

I wouldn't reccomend getting a projection TV if you are planning on hooking up a newer gaming console such as a PS2 or Xbox, they will most likely damage it. (Look for warnings in your console's manual.)

Re:a word of warning (2, Informative)

Babbster (107076) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642156)

Modern rear-projection (and front for that matter) televisions do not have significant burn-in problems. Five to ten years ago, this was a big problem but it just isn't anymore. The only way to burn in a new projection TV is to run a static image for days at a time without respite - something I wouldn't recommend doing. Normal usage, including video games, is just fine.

Re:a word of warning (2, Interesting)

platos_beard (213740) | more than 11 years ago | (#6645984)

My highly scientific *cough* research doesn't support this. There are a lot of internet postings indicating people with no problems, but many people seem to have phosphor burn problems as well. (You also gotta wonder why RPTV manuals have dire warnings about phosphor burn if it's not a big deal. One manual I read in PDF, maybe Toshiba, had the warning every half dozen pages or so.)

Logos (aka bugs) on things like Discovery Channel and new channel crawl bands seem particularly problematic. Proper configuration (primarily reducing brightness and contrast to sane levels) may have a significant impact.

I've got no problems with my Samsung HDTV (reasonable price, looks good, shallowest cabinet out there, a bit over budget for OP), but its only been a couple months.

Re:a word of warning (1)

Audin (17719) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642299)

Remeber that this is only a problem with CRT projectors.

One of the greatest sights in life is seeing GTA: Vice City on an
8' screen...

Re:a word of warning (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6643036)

What's a ' ?

Re:a word of warning (1)

RedWolves2 (84305) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644284)


Re:a word of warning (2, Interesting)

bakes (87194) | more than 11 years ago | (#6643254)

I played Colin McRae rally on a 3" screen

I was at a holiday home out in the bush - the TV only had a co-ax input, and the co-ax cable to go from the VCR to the TV was missing. Thus the only thing I could watch it on was the tiny weeny beeny LCD screen on my video camera. It was late when we arrived, and that's all we had.

The next day we called a friend who was on his way there to stop in town and get the co-ax cable.

Could have been worse, I suppose. Could have been a smaller LCD, or none at all. I don't think I would have even tried to play by watching in the viewfinder. OK, I probably would.

A few useful tidbits (5, Informative)

The Munger (695154) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642118)

First of all, Audio Review can be a useful site for all kinds of home theatre gear. They don't have a lot of the latest models, but it can give you a good idea of the best brands etc.

Second of all, there's a whole bunch of terminology you may want to become familiar with. First off, connections. You want component video inputs. For that price, you shouldn't have a problem getting a set with component video. It's seperates the signal into more discrete parts reducing interference greatly.

100Hz is really nice. It gives you a rock solid picture, that you can stare at for hours. It's not essential but for the price you're looking at, you can probably get a nice one.

Progressive scan means it draws the entire frame, every frame. Normal television is interlaced - it draws the odd lines one frame, and even frames the next. These translate into the "p" and "i" you see at the end of picture modes. What are picture modes I hear you cry?

Standard American broadcasts use NTSC (as does Japan). That has 480 lines of displayed resolution. So 480i is what you're used to seeing. Progessive scan output (from some DVD players and digital set-top boxes, and interpolated on some TVs from regular transmission), is called 480p. Remember, 'p' is better than 'i'.

Next up is PAL (used in Australia and UK). PAL is 576 lines. So if you're in PAL territory, try and get a TV that does 576p.

If you're in NTSC territory, 576p probably isn't that important. Similarly 480p isn't much used to the PAL folk.

Next up are the High-definition modes. There are two different HDTV modes: 720p and 1080i. It's arguable which one is better, though I'd favour 720p. Ideally, if you're going for HDTV, get a set that supports both. Different places around the world don't necessarily support both resolutions either - check for your area. The other thing worth knowing is that the XBox is the only console with HDTV output. Not that many support 720p though and a even less supporting 1080i. At around the $1000 mark, I think you're probably looking at a standard (CRT) television. You probably won't get HDTV for that price, but you probably will get a nice 100Hz, progressive-scan capable display. And go the widescreen. I'm regretting making my last TV a 4:3 (tech-talk for standard ratio), now that I have digital television. Lastly, if you're a bit of a junky when it comes to these things, get as many inputs as you can. Unless you're going to get an AV receiver (which typically only swap 2 sets of component video), you'll want to be able to plug in lots of stuff.

DLP (3, Interesting)

Frogbeater (216054) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642133)

The research I've been doing is in the $4000 range and I've decided on DLP.

There is no "burn-in" and the consoles are significantly thinner (not plasma thin, but thinner than traditional rear projection units.) The picture is pretty awesome at all angles and the technology is really cool.

Info on DLP concept. []

A vendor [] (Pricey, but informative.)

Rumors are around that sub-$1000 DLP systems will be out by the end of the year.

Re:DLP (1)

Mark Pitman (1610) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642753)

I looked at the Samsung rear projection DLP. The picture was really sharp, but the images had a lot of noise. Like in faces on the screen, the skin looked like it was crawling. Very distracting. Has anyone else noticed that?

Re:DLP (1)

SuiteSisterMary (123932) | more than 11 years ago | (#6646585)

If you looked at it on a show room floor, remember that they are terribly out of whack.

Probably the sharpness was turned to full, the colour temp was way up, the contrast was way skewed; all to make it stand out on a well-lit showroom floor.

Once you spend 1000+ on a TV, you owe it to yourself to get a certified ISF (ISF? My dyslexia has suddenly kicked in) tech to come calibrate it for you.

more info needed (4, Interesting)

Tumbleweed (3706) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642176)

Do you just watch regular broadcast TV? Are there enough HDTV broadcasts in your area that you're interested in to even bother with an HDTV set? Do you watch a lot of DVDs? The answers to these questions will help you narrow down your list.

If you watch a lot of DVDs, you'll probably want a widescreen set. That'll shoot up the price.

If you want to watch a lot of HDTV broadcasts, same thing, but with a further question: what HDTV spec (there are several) are the broadcasters in your area broadcasting in? Broadcasters are kind of split on whether to broadcast in 720p or 1080i. I'd rather watch 720p over 1080i, but too many people don't understand the difference between progressive and interlaced, and just assume the higher number means it's better. Feh.

How big a screen are you thinking about? There's a world of difference in price between a really good 27" set and a 36" flat-tube screen. Even between a 32" and a 36" can be a big price difference, depending on other features.

What I find annoying is that noone seems to be making intermediate TVs. I want a widescreen flat-tube 36" TV that goes up to 480p. No speakers. PIP (picture in picture) would be nice, too. But the thing is, there seems to be a plateau at a regular NTSC TV, and then it steps up to HDTV specs, with the attendant price increase. I just want to watch good DTV broadcasts and DVDs in full 480p mode (that's the max that DVDs can do - they don't even match low-end HDTV specs, sad to say). And what's with all the high-end tv with speakers? People who buy high-end TVs don't use the crappy built-in speakers - they're hooked up to a decent sound system.

TV manufacturers are downright _weird_ about some things.

Re:more info needed (1)

splattertrousers (35245) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642209)

And what's with all the high-end tv with speakers?

Not to mention tuners. Don't they realize that we all use TiVo now? I just want to buy a tube in an attractive box. I'll allow it to have a power switch and an IR sensor for power. And I wouldn't complain too loudly if it had multiple inputs that could be switched via IR. But that's it.

But I guess they wouldn't sell enough of them to make it worthwhile...

Re:more info needed (1)

lotawilly (696306) | more than 11 years ago | (#6643105)

And what's with all the high-end tv with speakers? People who buy high-end TVs don't use the crappy built-in speakers - they're hooked up to a decent sound system.
TV manufacturers are downright _weird_ about some things."

I'd be pretty pissed if I bought a $3,000 TV and I couldn't hear anything unless I also invested in a speaker setup.

Re:more info needed (1)

kasparov (105041) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644205)

Yes, but would you be as pissed if you spent $2000.00 on a TV with the same great picture quality , with the understanding that you could use the $1000.00 you saved on your own set of speakers?

Re:more info needed (1)

bakes (87194) | more than 11 years ago | (#6643275)

...what HDTV spec (there are several) are the broadcasters in your area broadcasting in?

They might be broadcasting a particular spec now, but that is not to say they will continue to do so. They might change the transmission from 720 to 1080 once more HDTV sets are out there. Or broadcast both and let you take your pick (if that is even possible).

I'd like to get a HDTV, but here in Australia it's still a bit early. The sets are too expensive and the broadcaster have only recently started pumping out a few HDTV shows. Most are not. Although I have to say I'm more inclined to get a HDTV now that the new series of Alias is in HD. Hmmmm...Jennifer Garner....

I've not compared 720p directly with 1080i, although I do understand the difference. I've been watching interlaced pictures for years and it's been OK, so 1080i can't be all that bad. Perhaps not as good as a progressive screen in comparison, but still better than SDTV.

Projectors et all (5, Informative)

okeby235 (99161) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642514)

Ok, I have spent some time doing this recently at home. Spent a heap of money but I am sure my experiance will be good for your more limited budget.

If you are going to go for a projector make sure the room is DARK. And I mean REAL DARK, like only watch movies at night or with blackout curtains. This may not be an issue if you have a tv room specific for watching tv, but it can be a pain normallly.

Be warned that there are two kinds of projectors floating around, Data projectors and Home Theater projectors. You definately want the second kind. Data projecters often have specs that look amazing (high res, very bright etc) but the colour quality SUCKS. They ghost lots on fast movement and are definately not something to watch tv or movies on.

The other thing to consider is that for $1000 you are not going to get a really amazing projector, I think you will be dissapointed by the brightness and quality of the picture. Projectors really improve as you throw money at them.

Limited bulb life of projectors is an issue too. It is many hundreds to replace a burned bulb and they typically last 2000 hours.

Ok, so after all that I think you should look for a nice tube tv. Make sure it has the following things:
* Widescreen format (16:9). I know lots of TV is not in widescreen now but it will be in future and most DVD's are. You don't want to be pissed off watching everything in a letterbox. Now is NOT the time to buy an old style 4:3 tv.
* component video input. Seperates the colours into different cables, greatly improves the picture quality and is essential when connecting a good dvd player.
* 100Hz. Faster refresh rate, the picture looks much sharper and clearer, easier on the eyes.

European TV's normally have all the above features, but they often are more than $1000. Look for Metz, Loewe and Grundig.

Hope that helps!

Consumer Reports (3, Informative)

rubinson (207525) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642581)

Your best bet is to do some real research rather than relying upon the anecdotal experiences of Slashdot readers and friends.

Consumer Reports tends to review televisions every few months. Their most recent comprehensive review (27-36 inches, HD-ready, and projection) was in the March 2003 issue. Perhaps your local library has a copy? They also have most of their content online at [] for a $4.95 monthly subscription ($24 per year).

If you're considering spending $1000, it's worth spending $5 on research.

Flat Tube (1)

RackinFrackin (152232) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642718)

My advice: Go with a flat tube. IMO they give the best picture for the money. They give a nicer picture than both the curved tubes and the projection TVs. Sure, they don't look as nice as the LCDs and plasma screens, but they are a whole lot cheaper. I'd avoid flat panels in the sub $1000 range. They are too small, and I've heard anecdotally that they have a shorter lifespan than tube TVs. I haven't used a video projector in several years, so I can't give much opinion on them.

I bought a 27" flat tube Sony about 6 months ago for about $500. If I had $1000 to blow on a TV, I'd either go with a slightly larger Sony, or maybe a widescreen flat tube if I could find one in that price range.

Most Versatile Setup for LCD Television (3, Insightful)

reporter (666905) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642808)

For maximum flexibility, select the following for your $1000 budget.

  1. NextVision N6 [] by Viewsonic
  2. Sony SXGA LCD monitor
  3. Sony stereo system
  4. video/audio cables
The NextVision N6 will convert any HDTV or SDTV signal into an RGB video signal and an audio signal that can be connected to a nice LCD monitor and a high-quality stereo, respectively. Furthermore, the NextVision N6 has a built-in SDTV tuner, so you can immediately start watching standard NTSC television programs.

While you enjoy your time shopping for this equipment, please remember that when you buy products made in a particular country, you indirectly support the value system of that country. So, please avoid products that are made in China (which includes Taiwan and Hong Kong). At Amnesty International [] and Tibet Online [] , you can find plenty of reasons to avoid products "Made in China" (which includes "Made in Taiwan" and "Made in Hong Kong").

Re:Most Versatile Setup for LCD Television (0, Offtopic)

bofkentucky (555107) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644206)

Why not support Taiwan and stick it to the ChiComs? Seems to me that would be the logical way to show the people of mainland China that representative democracy and capitalism is a far better system for the bulk of the people that a communist dictatorship run by corrupt bureaucrats? Not trolling, I really want to know what their justification for not supporting Taiwan is? From AI, it looks like their only beef with Taiwan is their use of the death penalty, which most American's have no problem with for violent criminals.

Avoiding Products "Made in Taiwan" (1)

reporter (666905) | more than 11 years ago | (#6646588)

The Taiwanese government has annually paid $2 million to select lobbying firms that peddle influence in the American government. An example of a lobbying firm is "Cassidy & Associates", which is mentioned in "Big Business Comes to Aid of China [] ". The Taiwanese use lobbying firms to paint an image of Taiwan that appeals to Americans even though the image is false.

What is the truth?

Please read "Fire-Breathing Dragon Burns Americans and Tibetans [] ". In 2000 May, the Department of Justice identified Taiwan as an intelligence threat. Please read "Reno calls Taiwan an intelligence threat [] ". Rules at the executive branch of the government prohibit the Justice Department and the FBI from commenting on why Taiwan has been added to the list of nations that pose a threat to American security. However, we at SlashDot can easily understand "why" when we see the facts: for example, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reports that the majority of spies who steal American military technology to give to Beijing actually were born and raised in Taiwan.

Re:Most Versatile Setup for LCD Television (1)

Gothmolly (148874) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644430)

Good call on the China thing. By treating as an equal and trading with the Chinese and other savage societies, you legitamize their conduct. As the homeowner gains nothing by bargaining with the robber, so the just gain nothing by 'splitting the difference' with the unjust.

Logo burn (1)

Andy Smith (55346) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642827)

If the TV channels you watch use permanent on-screen logos (DOGs, idents, whatever) then once you've narrowed down your list of TV choices you should check-up on how prone each of them is to so-called "logo burn". Some sets are much more vulnerable than others, especially rear-projection.

Monitors have screensavers, TVs generally don't, and if (for example) you're watching a news channel for an hour, with a logo constantly displayed in the corner of the screen, you could soon find that there's a "shadow" permanently burned on your screen. This will interfere with the rest of your viewing as the colour in that area of the screen will always be distorted.

Note that some TV manufacturers do warn about their sets being prone to logo burn, but these warnings are only made in the small-print of the manual, which of course you will only read after you've bought the set, if at all.

Check these pages for some brief info...

Watching TV is bad for your set! []

Screen Burn (LogoFreeTV campaign) []

Example picture #1 []

Example picture #2 []

Re:Logo burn (1)

WoTG (610710) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642912)

I thought TV burn in was only relevant for plasma screens. (Which is probably a little over the $1000 budget, unless you Americans get crazy deals compared to us Canucks...)

Traditional CRT's definitely don't need to worry about this. Screen savers have purely for graphical entertainment on computer screens for about a decade now. I'm pretty sure projection screens and LCDs are safe too.

Re:Logo burn (1)

pbrammer (526214) | more than 11 years ago | (#6645022)

Not true. My IBM monitor at work, model G78 built in April 2002, has a burned-in image of the CTRL-ALT-DELETE box from locking the terminal in Windows 2000.

Most CRTs are prone to burn in. Some might take longer than others, but I think they will all eventually burn in.

Re:Logo burn (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6646463)

I hear they have screensavers now in Windows 2000, I'd suggest looking into that.

Re:Logo burn (1)

pbrammer (526214) | more than 11 years ago | (#6646589)

You're a punk, AC. The parent poster said that screensavers weren't necessary because CRTs are not succeptible to burn in. I said they were necessary because I have burn in on my CRT.

Wait (1)

Detritus (11846) | more than 11 years ago | (#6642844)

Get a cheap NTSC TV today and wait a few years. Future sets will include tuners that can decode ATSC (HDTV) and digital cable. They will also have CRTs with better resolution than NTSC. LCD flat panel TVs will also be much cheaper.

I'm in a similar situation... (1)

andrewski (113600) | more than 11 years ago | (#6643013)

My TV is about a decade old, too. I have, after careful consideration, determined that an LCD projector (2500+ Lumens) seems to be the best long-term, easily transportable choice. Has anyone deployed an LCD projector (or DMD) as their TV? How is it? Did you use a screen or the wall?

i've heard epinions is good (1)

yo5oy (549821) | more than 11 years ago | (#6643053) try it. maybe look at as the majority of that community is really into home theater.

TV reviews (2, Informative)

asjk (569258) | more than 11 years ago | (#6643171)

I am also looking for some good sites for comparing and learning more about the current state-of-the-art in televisions.
Try where they give a good overview of TVs and reviews by the staff and users alike. They have a good database set up to compare products. I used this resource in researching my TV purchase. I eventually bought a Sony 32 inch XBR flat screen and love it. I found that Crutchfield's online price beat any of the local outlets since I didn't have to pay $300 sales tax. They delivery was free and the nice men even put the set into my entertainment center.

Buy two, and make sure they are fit for purpose (3, Informative)

GreatDrok (684119) | more than 11 years ago | (#6643187)

I have spent a lot of time on this and ended up compromising and buying two TVs. Most made for TV material is 4:3 and shot for a small screen. If you watch that material on a big screen it is really going to look bad as you stare up news reader's noses and the likes. A small set (21-25") is ideal for that sort of casual watching material. It is still worth getting a good set though but HDTV ready is not necessary. You will need to use a calibration DVD (eg Video Essentials) to pick a set that will actually give you good flesh tones etc. I bought a 21" Sony, got into the factory settings menu and reset it to give a more natural picture. Sony (as do many others) set the colour temp far too high so you end up with a very blue picture which might look impressive but is rather unrealistic. With that I am all set for watching standard definition material.

For movies I bought a single chip DLP projector (InFocus X1) which is the best bang for the buck at the moment. Fully multistandard, calibrates wonderully and is very bright and clear. The video scaler and deinterlacer are excellent too extracting 24fps from NTSC LDs with 3:2 pulldown eliminating judder. Resolution of the DLP is only 800x600 but that is ample for all current DVDs and even in 16:9 mode where it compresses the picture down vertically it still looks clear. A true 16:9 projector would have a little more resolution but brightness and colour correctness make up for this small deficiency, and cost (about $1500). Oh, and it will accept HDTV signals although it downconverts. Once HD is really cooking this projector will be ready to retire anyway so not to worry.

Lessons to live by:

Buy Video Essentials, practice with it until you can get a really nice picture, try several sets, it takes time to get used to it but you will learn which TVs can be calibrated and which can't.

Don't be swayed by the brightest punchiest picture in the shop. Quite likely a TV with that default setting is running a very high colour temp and also the tube is liable to burn. A calibrated picture looks dark and dull at first but once you get used to it you will never go back. Room lighting is also important, TVs are not designed to be used in brightly lit rooms, control the light, especially that shining on the screen.

Avoid LCD TVs like the plague, the scalers in them are very poor and they have poor contrast and black level, plus they cost a fortune for what is really a very small and muddy picture. They are a very poor substitute for plasma screens.

Plasma TVs are for people who like to show off. Very few produce an acceptable picture, and those that do cost a lot. For the money you would spend on one of them you can have a nice little direct view and a huge projection system. My set up currently has a 100" screen but I want something bigger. It cost less than half the price of a decent plasma screen and the picture is 3x bigger.

LCD projectors are better than they used to be but DLP is much better and about the same money. The InFocus X1 can be had for less than $1500 which is amazing value, particularly as it has a built in Faroudja deinterlacer.

For CRTs, make sure that the picture is stable when there is a strong flashing image (Video Essentials includes the necessary tests and instructions). Nothing worse than a TV where the picture bends and pulses when Arnie blows s**t up :-)

Back projection CRTs are OK but very bulky, imagine what your room will be like when the thing is not turned on. It will be like sharing a room with the monolith out of 2001 and you're back to staring up people's noses. Once all TV is shot assuming large screens as movies are then this won't be a problem. As I said, my solution is to have a small set for small screen stuff and a big screen for big screen movies. Cost is more than your budget but you might be able to find ex-demo or secondhand projectors on E-bay and it is well worth it.

Of course, you could just avoid all this and buy the first set that you like the look of, but that wouldn't be the slashdot way now would it? :-D

Two Reasons: Point Blank & Duck Hunt = tube TV (1)

adzoox (615327) | more than 11 years ago | (#6643640)

You can get a 30" Samsung HDTV ($699 this week at Best Buy) and something like a Sansui DVD/TV/VCR (yes all 3 in one box) 24" TV ($299 this week at Best Buy)

Have one for your bedroom and one for your living room/ company - you'd be surprised at how handy and space saving these new 3 in 1's are. Also MAKE SURE what ever TV you get that it has front av inputs. Nice for a digital camera or hooking up a laptop on the fly. Some TV's (just not in the $1000 price range) have DVI hookups.

I'd go with glass for this reason and you can see if you have the same need. I have just about ALL the light gun games ever made for home video game consoles - I WILL NEVER give up a way to play Point Blank (1,2,3) or Duck Hunt. To me, these games and Tetris are the ONLY playable video games. SO, if you ever want to play a light gun based game, at least you can with a glass tube TV, you can't with a projection, plasma, or LCD.

TV Buying Advice (2, Informative)

cumorehe (105484) | more than 11 years ago | (#6643683)

I bought a new HD projection TV a little while back, here are the things I realized once it was here:
Depending on the size you get, make sure that the room you plan on putting it in is big enough. If there isn't enough space between your primary viewing location and the tv, you're going to be overwhelmed. Mine is 50", my living room is ~12' wide. I ended up having to rearrange everything in my living room so that the tv was against one wall and the couch against the opposite wall. I could still use a few extra feet.

Make sure you can block most of the sunlight coming into the room that you can put it in. My tv will auto adjust the picture based upon the ambient light in the room. Even still, the image looks the best when the room is fairly dark.

A projection tv can cause problems depending on your viewing habits. If there are typically one or two people watching the tv from directly in front of it, you're fine. If you typically have friends over, you may have trouble with your viewing angle, depending on how the furniture is set up.

Widescreen HD projection screens are still projection. That means they still have some problems with burn in. Normal signals will appear with a black band on either side of the image. Apparently, these black bands can burn into the screen. This means you have to do some type of morphing of the image to make it full screen. This degrades the image of most broadcast stations. The tradeoff is natively formatted widescreen. However, many DVD's don't have the same ratio as the TV. This means you will still have bands, albeit smaller ones, on the top and bottom.

Check your area for HD offerings via digital cable. It is far cheaper to pay ~$10 extra on your cable bill a month than buying an expensive over the air tuner. My cable company offers a few channels (about 6), but there are more coming online all the time.

Also, some regular broadcast stations end up looking worse on my 50" HD than my 27" normal tube. This depends on the resolution of the cameras and the broadcast. Any deficiencies become exaggerated. Last year's Super Bowl was hyped that it would be done in all HD. For the most part, everything looked fine. Fine until they switched to their low-res on the field cameras. The images were terrible and almost unwatchable.

Make sure you do your research before buying. Research brands and models and look for any reports of problems with the ones you are considering. I did this before buying mine as was shocked at the number and severity of things being reported. The model I ended up buying had no negative reports, and I've had no problems, although your mileage may vary.

Hope this is useful to someone...

Crutchfield & CrutchfieldAdvisor (1)

entropi (2933) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644022)

There are a number of articles and how-to's on just about every aspect of TVs including flat-panels and HDTV over at [] .

I would start with the Choosing a TV [] learning center article and check out the HDTV Center [] as well.

(Disclaimer: I am associated with Crutchfield, but there's honestly some of the best information anywhere located there)

Re:Crutchfield & CrutchfieldAdvisor (1)

CaptainCap (194813) | more than 11 years ago | (#6645965)

Keeping in mind that Crutchfield will never tell you "just wait a few years," I often go to the Crutchfield site or check a Crutchfield catalog for product info and comparisons. And I am not associated with Crutchfield.

Buy smart, keeping future in mind. (1)

Sherloqq (577391) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644209)

I moved into a new apartment a while back, and decided that my 19" Sharp TV wasn't cutting it anymore. I decided to upgrade. Here's what I did:

- TV standards are not finalized yet, and the deadline for ratification (IIRC) has been extended past 2006, the original due date. As such, thich means that there's several competing standards out there. The more standards a TV is compatible with, the more expensive it gets. Additionally, with people getting digital cable and satellite receivers, a TV doesn't really need a tuner, anyway -- all work is already done, all it gets is straight video signal.

- TV speakers can't really do justice to a movie that's got 5.1 surround sound in Dolby Digital / DTS. If you want to get the experience, separate your output: picture goes to TV, sound goes to a receiver + speakers.

Once I've reached these two conclusions, I decided to hold off on buying a new TV. Instead, I recycled a 26" Sony CRT TV set, bought a receiver and a set of speakers, and use my VCR as a tuner. VCR feeds A/V into receiver, receiver sends video to TV, audio to speakers. The receiver is now the hub of the entertainment system, so I made sure it had enough inputs and outputs for future growth (for now, all I have is a DVD player and a tape deck, but I have room for satellite / digital cable if need be, or another DVD player / VCR). Sound is phenomenal, even if only coming from broadcast TV / analog cable, thanks to CircleSurround feature of the receiver. Video is big enough that I can sit comfortably 10-15ft away and enjoy the show. And my receiver's remote control is programmable, so all my devices are controlled from one remote (except the tape deck, which didn't have one anyway). The receiver can do digital coax/optical audio-in, RCA/S-video/component video in, RCA/S-video-component video out, so when the day comes to upgrade the TV, I'll be set (and I'll upgrade my DVD player to one with component video out, too).

I think my setup will be good for another, oh, 10 years. I hope.

Check out AVS Forums (2, Informative)

Zathrus (232140) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644273)

First off, if you want a good site for general home theater stuff, check out AVS Forums [] . You may end up wanting to spend more than your budget though :)

That said, I'd highly recommend you get a widescreen HDTV-compatible set. If you want to keep your TV around for as long (or longer) as your last set, you'll regret not getting HDTV. No, the switchover isn't going to happen in 2006. But it will happen, and you can receive HDTV in most areas now. Even without HD reception you'll get better DVD viewing, a huge computer monitor (if you want), and can get better visual quality out of most consoles.

Your choices are going to be rather limited at $1000, and I can't recommend any specific ones (I just bought a new TV set... but for considerably more than $1k... the Samsung HLN467W - 46" DLP widescreen), but there are some available. Do check out the menus. Check to see if it has discrete codes available, otherwise you'll want to kill yourself if you get a programmable remote (or, more likely, your SO will want to kill you because they can't operate the damn system). Check what inputs it has -- at this price point about the most you can hope for is one or two component inputs on the high end. You almost certainly won't get a VGA or DVI input.

If you don't go HD, then don't bother buying a TV bigger than about 32" -- which will be far, far below your budget. Big screen non-HD is just a waste of money.

Full outlay vs Monthly bill (1)

bolix (201977) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644329)

You mention your specific budget in terms that infer 1 full expenditure. Have you thought about buying your TV on a store Credit Card? Most stores (BestBuy, Sears etc) will balance a $4000 Plasma to ~$90pm for 4 years.

This will future greatly proof your investment (at this price, includes the HDTV 720x). No i don't work for a big store but i am drooling over the Panasonic and Daewoo 42" Plasmas for a personal Xmas present. My budget matches yours. I am also looking at a Sony XBR32" for ~$800 online. No idea what condition you'll get it in tho' !

I was going to buy a TV... (0)

csoto (220540) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644590)

...just a few months ago. It was going to be a nice Sony VEGA 1080i jobber at 40" diagonal. Except then I realized it wouldn't fit in my pretty-large-already entertainment center. I would have to get a new one. This meant dealing with unhooking everything, unloading all the DVDs, CDs, etc. stored in it, then moving the beast, selling it (or Goodwill), etc. The final clincher was that I decided it wasn't worth it for the crap available on TV. The only thing that keeps me watching is digital cable, and only because IFC, SUND, STARZ and a few others show non-blockbusters (e.g. crap) fairly regularly. Oh, and HBO. Gotta watch Kristin Davis on Sex in the City :)

Projector bulbs == $$$$ (0)

csoto (220540) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644617)

Typical DLP projector bulbs run around $400. And we buy in quantity!

Did you try epinions? (1)

chrysrobyn (106763) | more than 11 years ago | (#6644865)

Did you look at [] ?

I realize that lots of people like Ask Slashdot because they feel that they're pretty similar to the average Slashdot reader, but there is a wider audience out there. Epinions is a site where you can search for many parameters, like brand or price, or features, and see what fellow consumers have recommended.

I wrote a little description of the TV I bought a while ago here [] .

As with anything where you ask for people's opinions, I find it helpful to find the harshest critics and decide if you side with them or discount their ideas. Many times, in epinions and in real life, the people with the worst criticism complain about features something doesn't have as if they didn't read the product description, or how unreliable it is when it's treated abnormally ("Sony VCRs suck because one broke when my son dropped it off my roof" kind of things). If, however, you find people complaining about how the product doesn't perform as advertised, or how it fails in normal circumstances, you know it really is bad.

DON'T buy a widescreen Sony TV (1)

nicsterrr (529317) | more than 11 years ago | (#6645729)

DON'T buy a widescreen Sony TV if you don't like buzzing noises whilst watching at lower volumes.

I wish I hadn't bought mine late last year. I'm just coming to the end of 6 months of waiting for Sony to decide what to do with my 28" 100hz widescreen TV which has been sitting in the shop all this time.

Shortly after buying it, I asked the dealer to sort out an annoying buzz that was coming from the deflector yoke and was annoying when watching TV at lower volume levels. After six months of stalling, Sony finally decided to repurchase the television since they seem to have decided that they are unable to supplying me one that doesn't have the aforementioned loud enough to be annoying buzzing sound. Apparently, all their larger widescreen TVs do this. Sounds to me like a quality control issue.

If you're the sort of person that likes to watch stuff that has quieter scenes as well as loud hollywood action, my advice is to stay away from a Sony.

hdtv ready and get a tube tv (1)

steelerguy (172075) | more than 11 years ago | (#6645888)

If you want to keep your budget under $1,000 you can pretty much forget about a projector. I don't think you will find one that is high quality enough to make it worth it.

I would not worry about getting an HDTV because you won't find many under $1,000, but may be able to find an HDTV ready set at 32" or 36". The biggest advantage is not so much that they are HDTV ready but that because they are they have more lines of resolution than just a normal set. For normal TV or cable viewing this will not mean much, but when you pop in a DVD you will definately see the difference.

The last two things that I think are essential are flat screen and a 3 line digital filter. If you get a decent flat screen it will most likely have the 3 line digital filter.

Like the fist poster said, you can't go wrong with a Sony...especially the Wega. You can probably get either a 32" HDTV ready or a 36" standard Wega. I would not worry about 16:9 TV's unless you watch a hell of a lot of DVD's, otherwise you just end up watching either distored regular TV or you got to 4:3 and lose about 1/3 of your screen.

all in the timing (1)

finallyHasANickname (559395) | more than 11 years ago | (#6646428)

1. Contact a lawyer about a living will.
2. Kiss all your loved ones farewell.
3. Dive into a pool of liquid nitrogen.
4. When they thaw you out, you'll get a free HDTV set with a magazine subscription.

Hey. It worked for pocket calculators. They used to cost--what--a hundred bucks when the minimum wage was $2.50?

LCD (1)

rakerman (409507) | more than 11 years ago | (#6646616)

I use a Dell 2000FP 20" LCD. It has no TV tuner of its own, but it has VGA, DVI, composite and S-video inputs (which you have to manually switch on the front bezel). I use a VCR as my TV tuner.

The price on it is $999.
Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?