Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Give The NGage And Phantom A Chance?

simoniker posted more than 11 years ago | from the be-charitable-this-xmas dept.

Portables (Games) 71

Thanks to GameSpy for their 'Sole Food editorial urging gamers to take another look at the NGage and Phantom games hardware. Regarding Nokia's NGage game/phone hybrid, the piece suggests: "Gamers should be excited by what Nokia is bringing to the table. Mobile multiplayer gaming via Bluetooth and GSM/GPRS is a wonderful idea and definitely the future of portable gaming." As for Infinium Labs' Phantom console, the author is cautious but optimistic: "I'm not advocating the Phantom, but I'm very much fascinated by what Infinium purports it will introduce to console gaming: digital distribution. This is definitely the way gamers will buy games in the future." Reason enough to think again?

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

In a word, no. (5, Funny)

Snowspinner (627098) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852005)

The N-Gage has justifiably gotten shitty reviews for its crappy controls, crappy looking screen, the worst system for loading games ever, is overpriced, and is just generally lousy. So, no, I don't plan on giving it a second look. While bluetooth multiplayer and a few of its features are nice, I intend to wait for them to be implemented on a device that doesn't suck.

As for the Phantom... ummm... it's best feature is the fact that DNF is going to be a launch game.

Re:In a word, no. (1)

StocDred (691816) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852029)

Precisely. We've already heard that the PSP will support wireless networking, the former Afterburner dopes are working on wireless for GBA, and you just know Nintendo itself will include it stock with the next GBA iteration.

Sorry N-Gage. I'll remain looking "uncool" with my GBA SP until then.

Re:In a word, no. (1)

GeckoX (259575) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852096)

As for the Phantom... ummm... it's best feature is the fact that DNF is going to be a launch game.

Wow, I had no idea. Are they really saying that?
So, in other words they are publicly stating that the Phantom will never be available - so you'd better get one quick?

Re:In a word, no. (1)

Snowspinner (627098) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852529)

No, they're not actually saying that. =)

Re:In a word, no. (2, Insightful)

Alkaiser (114022) | more than 11 years ago | (#6854170)

Let's see...the N-Gage and Phantom want to advertise on our let's write an article telling gamers to possibly endorse the WORST 2 ideas ever.

On one hand, the N-Gage, a system I wanted to like because it would be an international phone, AND a gaming console, so I could keep in touch while I was in Japan.

Guess what? Phone coverage doesn't include Japan. Also, the screen is way too freaking small, and the controls are phone controls. So...I can't use it for the reasons I wanted to use the phone, and I can't use it as a viable gaming system. Back to 1000 yen phone cards, and putting my GBA in my carry-on.

Then we have the Phantom...which "unveiled"itself to show...nothing. No actual console, no nothing. What should we be giving a shot, exactly? The wholesale shunning of product in exchange for an all-hype, no-substance world? Gimme a break GameSpy. You guys are right up there with InsertCredit now.

Re:In a word, no. (2, Interesting)

Babbster (107076) | more than 11 years ago | (#6855920)

Then we have the Phantom...which "unveiled"itself to show...nothing. No actual console, no nothing. What should we be giving a shot, exactly? The wholesale shunning of product in exchange for an all-hype, no-substance world? Gimme a break GameSpy. You guys are right up there with InsertCredit now.

Good point. I would only add that the main drawback to my mind is the fact that it's just supposed to be a mildly inexpensive PC which will apparently play PC games, which also requires a monthly subscription fee. Unless companies like Blizzard, Id, Atari, etc. quit developing games for the general-purpose PC to only release games on the Phantom, I have zero interest in the device. And I'm not even entirely against paying subscription fees for online games/services - I've played Everquest, I have Xbox Live and I plan on jumping into Star Wars Galaxies once I upgrade my current computer. I can only imagine what the people who balk at fees for Xbox Live (a pretty cheap $4+ a month) will think of Infinium's "console."

I'd be surprised if the Phantom ever got distributed on anything like the scale of the other consoles...even if it does, I think it will have a spectacularly short lifespan - it will probably make the 3DO look like a rousing success.

Shure (3, Insightful)

August_zero (654282) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852024)

Gather round children, and let me tell you a little story about the Phillips CD-I, or the 3D0, or the Sega 32-X. You see, all of these were systems that consumers cried "foul" on long before they even hit the store shelves. Some unfortunate souls bought these, and for their dilligence they were rewarded with very expensive door stops.

New does not mean better, and when someone is trying to tell you their product can do everything from play every game ever made, all the way to cure cancer you are completely right in smelling a rat.

Innovation makes the world go round, but clearly these two products, the phantom and the N-Gage are not the light at the end of the tunnel. They are merely C.H.U.D.s with a flashlight trying to eat your wallet.

Re:Shure (1)

imperator_mundi (527413) | more than 11 years ago | (#6857545)

You forgot to mention Jaguar and Virtual Boy ; )
As a wise man said:

"ever get the feeling you've been cheated?" (Johnny Rotten)

Being N-Gage a phone you will still able use it for its main purpose when the gaming thing will vanish like soap bubble... phantom... mmmh phantom... who honestly believe that phantom will hit the shelves for real?

Killer apps first (1)

GeckoX (259575) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852042)

These guys may have very innovative systems available, they may have the right idea about the future, but NOBODY is going to buy into that.

Content people, killer apps, sorry, games in this case, or no go...end of story.

Yes, there are games available for these systems, along the lines of the multiplayer games available on my cell phone. All crap. This level of content can't even sell phones, it's just extra 'fluff'.

Now, show me a phantom system that can play halflife loaded off of the install on my pc or something and we're starting to get somewhere...

Download & MMC (1)

neglige (641101) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852051)

I think the greatest advantage of the N-Gage is that it allows the games to be downloaded as well as to be distributed on a MMC. Other mobile gaming initiatives were download only - and the device could store only one game. And when you switched games, you had to pay the entire fee again.

I'm no developer, so another benefit could be that games for the N-Gage are basically J2ME games for a Series 60 device (I hope I understood that correctly on the developer site). It could run on other devices as well, although I'm not sure about additional functions the N-Gage has to offer.

Has anyone already created some code for it and is willing to share some insights?

Re:Download & MMC (1)

gl4ss (559668) | more than 11 years ago | (#6854009)

ngage spesific games are not 'basically j2me games for a series60 phones', rather spesifically made for it(in symbian, afaik has some 3d api the other s60 phones lack, i haven't held one in my hand or looked for any sdk's though). but ngage can run those(j2me games for s60) and symbian series60 apps which makes it intresting, because that allows wide range of programs for other s60 phones to be run, including web browsers, irc clients(and other im, which over gprs is _way_ much cheaper and handy than sms so the teens should love it), ebook readers, c64 emulator, gbc emulator and so on right from the launch available on internet from 3rd party developers. if you're looking for a s60 type of phone then depending on the pricing it might be just nice extra that it has the gaming functionality.

Sure they deserve another look, but... (1)

PipianJ (574459) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852098)

Sure they present decent ideas that will inevitably be accepted (see Dreamcast's failure, except for the introduction of new online gaming on the console), but they are a bit early on the draw, and they are presenting them in a problematic format.

Ngage for example: Sure wireless portable gaming is a great idea, and I would not be too surprised if it made it into the next-generation GBA (or the generation after next), but there are too many design flaws with the Ngage for it to actually succeed. See it's high price (if you're going to exclusively use it for gaming) and the difficulty in changing games (you have to remove the BATTERY?)

Phantom: It's the Xbox, except a little more problematic. It doesn't have much in the way of decent developers (thus far) and it is bound exclusively to contact online for a compulsory fee. You can't go EXCLUSIVELY online with ytour games. Gamers like to own their own games too, and not every gamer has online access.

In summary: Yes, they provide great new ideas, but they are simply implemented poorly by new entries into the arena that have a high chance of failure. But only time will tell if their prophesies will be true in the long run (and I wager they will be)

Here's a look for you (2, Insightful)

jvmatthe (116058) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852143)

Let me give my wallet another look...nope, I don't see $300 there for a handheld system that has received lukewarm previews.

Let me give my sense of convenience another look...nope, I don't see me taking off a battery every time I want to change games.

Let me give my GBA another look...decent price, convenient...yep, everything I currently need in a handheld. With the light, looks good.

I think I'll go look at all the cheap used games in my local store while I'm looking.

Re:Here's a look for you (2, Funny)

RevAaron (125240) | more than 11 years ago | (#6853374)

But, but ... Only little kids use GBAs! To play Pokemon! For everything else the GBA doesn't work! Pokemon = Little kids! Duh! What if you want to play a game while at a busy club- you'll look like a little kid! HAHAHA, what a dork! Solution? Buy an N-Gage- the girls will LICK you at the lame ass club when you pull it out to play some Sonic.

Yeah, right. Fuck Nokia's silly marketing and name-calling.

Re:Here's a look for you (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6855898)

Please stop imagining Gabe's dick in your mouth.

The first things to look for in game hardware.. (3, Funny)

AltaMannen (568693) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852152)

1) Original Games
2) Quality of games (estimated of course)
3) Will have games that you like when you buy the hardware
4) Load Times (digital distribution seems the slowest, possibly apart from c-64 casette w/o turbo).

Never ever buy game hardware for playing games for any of the following reasons (especially if they are the ONLY reason)
1) Monthly plans
2) Method of selling you games
3) Also cleans your underpants

Okay, I'll give the Phantom a chance.... (3, Funny)

JFMulder (59706) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852232)

Let's see what are their launch titles... hum...
Bikini Karate Babes.

Okay, that does it. You lost your one chance at credibility. :)

Has anyone played the N-Gage. It's Terrible. (2, Insightful)

liquidzero4 (566264) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852238)

It's such a terrible system. I can't beleive anyone, especaily someone from GameSpy would have anything nice to say about it.

I don't care who makes the system or the games, if it's good, it's good.

But this thing is just terrible. From what I saw the graphics/sound were terrible. This thing was so slow. It looked like it's wasn't pushing more than 10 frames a seconds. It looked like a high tech flip book.

The game play on anysystem that slow has got to be terrible. It reminded me of playing Doom on a 25 Mhz 386.

Re:Has anyone played the N-Gage. It's Terrible. (-1, Flamebait)

Mike Hawk (687615) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852327)

I also played it. My impression could not have been farther from yours.

It was pushing smooth frame rates of Playstation quality graphics. Maybe you weren't playing an N-Gage? What game were you playing? I saw Tomb Raider and Tony Hawk's Pro Skater running flawlessly. Maybe you were looking at some screenshots and mistook them for video?

Re:Has anyone played the N-Gage. It's Terrible. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6853039)

What about that was flamebait? I played the thing for a bit at E3. It was clear the original poster hadnt. So I made a joke at the end? Thats flamebait?

Re:Has anyone played the N-Gage. It's Terrible. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6853468)

While I usually lash out against the morons who mod down comments, I'd actually have to agree with the Flamebait mod. You sound like a Nokia drone, dude. "Playstation quality graphics"?? Give the slashbots a little more credit than that.

The thing is a steaming pile of crap. It hurts to play it...both physically and mentally.

Re:Has anyone played the N-Gage. It's Terrible. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6857079)

Rule of thumb: Every "Mike" on slashdot is a tosser.

Re:Has anyone played the N-Gage. It's Terrible. (1, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6852382)

Why would it surprise you that GameSpy would have something nice to say about it?

GameSpy Editor: "Nokia just paid us money to write about how cool their system is. Who wants to write about it?"

GameSpy Writers: (all put heads down and look at floor).

GameSpy Editor: "OK... well, Raymond Padilla; since you're playing Britney's Dance Beat [] you clearly have the lowest standards... write something nice."

Re:Has anyone played the N-Gage. It's Terrible. (1)

riotous (113418) | more than 11 years ago | (#6853399)

I managed to get my hands on one at the n-gage stall in ETCS, when I stepped up to have a go on tomb raider the N-gage bloke's actually words were

"It has a lot of controls and its a bit difficult"

Nuff Said Really

Penny Arcade (3, Funny)

suss (158993) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852258)

Penny Arcade had something to say about people who Astroturf the ngage [] ...

As for the Phantom [] ...

Re:Penny Arcade (1)

Alizarin Erythrosin (457981) | more than 11 years ago | (#6853589)

Tycho also had an interesting news post [] on the Phantom subject (about half-way down the page, titled "Oh, Right"), as well as Gabe's response directly below.

Re:Penny Arcade (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6865421)

This [] s a much better strip about the phantom....

Yes and No (1)

Metal_Demon (694989) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852297)

To the phantom I say yes, though it's not a second chance because I never said or heard anything bad about it. Only comments being that phantom, as it's name suggests, will never be seen...ghost-ware?

To N-Gage I say fook oof. You taco shaped, overpriced (even for a cellphone, honestly where are you people buying your phones), battery removal requiring craptastic POS.

Maybe... (2, Insightful)

mcgroarty (633843) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852336)

Maybe I'd give the NGage a chance if you didn't have to pop the battery and break out a screwdriver to change game carts.

"But it's supposed to be for online game play!"

Then why are the few polished titles (Sonic, etc) still carts for it?

Re:Maybe... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6852871)

I'll admit I don't like that you have to take the battery out to change games, but please don't disseminate lies. You do not need a screwdriver to change games.

It clips in just like every other nokia battery has in their phones for the last several years with some sort of release.

My problem with it is that it introduces another piece that could potentially get lost in a fumble to change games. If I want to change a game with the GBA, I pop one game out, and replace it with another. I have to open a door take out the battery and game, put the new game in, put the battery in, close the door. There's a lot more to fumble with that is not permanently attached to the system.

There is just too much about this fone that could have been done better. On top of that, I'm not planning on replacing my Sidekick, which replaced my camera fone, which replaced my traditional cell phone.... (get the picture yet?) There's enough gimmick out there with phones.

Can I just get a phone that is well designed now? I'd really like one that is compact and has an easily accessed ear piece (bluetooth headset?) attached right to it and hey I just might buy it. And I'm sure as hell not spending $300 on game system that is mediocre at that cost.

Re:Maybe... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6853019)

he probably needs a screwdriver because the game gets wedged tight

that happened to my first one. i returned the phone and the game and now i play only online game

Re:Maybe... (1)

mcgroarty (633843) | more than 11 years ago | (#6853670)

You aren't the only one but the new NGages have a looser plug. Borrow a game and try again.

The Phantom is a hoax (0)

opeuga (208321) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852450)

Farbeit for the Penny Arcade guys to spur a little investigative journalism, but read the post entitled "Oh, Right" from this page [] .

I like the *idea* of the Phantom... (1)

KCardoza (593977) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852460)

I'd be willing to give the Phantom a chance, regardless of what Gabe and Tycho of PA fame have to say. But I'm still operating under the assumption that it's vaporware. If it's ever actually released, I'll try it out. Still, it's a great idea. A pre-configured, upgradable, HDTV-compatable game console? Great idea. Add in a DVD-ROM/CD-RW drive, or better yet, a DVD-RW/CD-RW, the ability to save TV shows to the hard drive (And make that drive big, fast, and upgradable) ala Tivo, or record live or already recorded video to DVD or (S)VCD (Hey, I watch a lot of anime fansubs, and burning them to an SVCD is cheaper than burning to DVD), the ability to network with PCs, and the best of the PC games out there, and you've got my money.

Re:I like the *idea* of the Phantom... (3, Funny)

Danse (1026) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852714)

Still, it's a great idea. A pre-configured, upgradable, HDTV-compatable game console? Great idea. Add in a DVD-ROM/CD-RW drive, or better yet, a DVD-RW/CD-RW, the ability to save TV shows to the hard drive (And make that drive big, fast, and upgradable) ala Tivo, or record live or already recorded video to DVD or (S)VCD (Hey, I watch a lot of anime fansubs, and burning them to an SVCD is cheaper than burning to DVD), the ability to network with PCs, and the best of the PC games out there, and you've got my money.

Wow, that would be awesome!! Ya know, I think we should call it a personal computer! Everyone will want one!

Re:I like the *idea* of the Phantom... (1)

KCardoza (593977) | more than 11 years ago | (#6853252)

Hrm. The differences between what I said, and any given personal computer, are as follows: 1) Acts more like a hybrid of a Tivo, an XBox, and a DVD Recorder. 2) No "PC" Applications, like office suites, web browsers, etc. 3) No desk needed. 4) It's part of your living-room setup (IE, you hook it up to your TV and stereo, etc). By definition, *all* game consoles are personal computers. The difference is that game consoles are targeted at gaming. But hey, maybe you're right. I've been known to have a few moments of nonbrilliance when it comes to expressing opinions.

Re:I like the *idea* of the Phantom... (1)

Danse (1026) | more than 11 years ago | (#6854040)

1) Acts more like a hybrid of a Tivo, an XBox, and a DVD Recorder.

Aside from playing X-Box games, a PC can do those things.

2) No "PC" Applications, like office suites, web browsers, etc.

Don't have to install those apps on your PC if you don't want to (well, except for IE, but you can consider that part of the OS and just delete the shortcuts to it, or you can consider internet access as a cool new feature of your "PC Console").

3) No desk needed. 4) It's part of your living-room setup (IE, you hook it up to your TV and stereo, etc)

Can buy a slim black case for your PC and stick it in your entertainment center if you like. There's lots of ways to make it look snazzy if you really want to.

By definition, *all* game consoles are personal computers. The difference is that game consoles are targeted at gaming.

Possibly so, if you use a very broad definition of PC. Most consoles are more like extremelely hobbled PCs, and their main redeeming quality is that they all use the same hardware so that they are easier to develop for.

Re:I like the *idea* of the Phantom... (1)

Ceyan (668082) | more than 11 years ago | (#6854161)

You just proved your word has no bearing. Listen, when you think of a consumer market you have to think of an actual consumer, not yourself. Most people don't even know that you can buy a mini-PC and use it as you would a game console. Furthermore there is a definited distinction in a consumers mind between "PC" and "Console". The Phantom is being marketed as a "Console", which right there puts it into a different class of equipment in 50% of the minds that will buy one.

Re:I like the *idea* of the Phantom... (1)

Danse (1026) | more than 11 years ago | (#6855053)

Right. And being a complex piece of equipment, it will end up much like any other complex piece of equipment they own... hardly used. The people that don't know or understand what the thing is capable of, yet buy one anyway, are the same people that can't even figure out how to use a browser or email app on their computer. The same people who can't set the clock on their VCR. Unless you make the thing do practically everything on its own, nobody will be able to take advantage of the vast majority of its capabilities. But you have a point. It probably will sell better when marketed as a console. There's one born every minute ya know.

Re:I like the *idea* of the Phantom... (1)

Dr Reducto (665121) | more than 11 years ago | (#6854111)

Actually, about the Phantom, I read somewhere that the guy wants to sell the Phantom like a computer. You can get extra RAM or a bigger HDD. Unfortunately, it will NOT be available with a CD/DVD drive. That would make it sell too many units. The guy was even quoted as saying that he might try to sell them through E-Bay! If the Phantom had DVR, a DVD player, a nice HDD, and came first to market, it would have a very good chance of success. Even more so if it let you run XP-compatible programs and games. Unfortunately, that will probably not happen.

I don't understand... (1)

zerocp (629067) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852485)

Why nokia didn't at least try to licence the current gba technology? (maybe they did) But it all makes perfect sense when you stop and think about it. You have an established chipset that already had about 250 (am i right) games available. The quality of the graphics and sound are already accepted by the general public. Now they would have had to probably make their own interface, as in the shape of the shell, buttons, as well as adding the wireless support (easy) and there you go, a good phone (love nokias) and a good protable system, at a decent price. That's what really bugs me though, is that a company as large as Nokia would even think that it's going to sell at what they're charging...

Re:I don't understand... (1)

nifboy (659817) | more than 11 years ago | (#6855119)

Wait, you think Nokia is going to walk up to Nintendo and ask "Hey, can we use your tech so we can compete with you?" Is there a (-1, Ignorant) we can use?

Please, Somebody Buy This System! (1, Interesting)

Etone (627948) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852494)

It's almost as if Nokia tossed Gamespot a little treat and their salivating editors all leapt for it at the same time. I've read way too many reviews from people who aren't on anyone's payroll that said this thing is a total piece of crap. Maybe if Nokia had purchased some better reviews earlier it could have saved them. I'm sorry, but Cool Tech + Shitty Implementation will never equal a sale for me. I'll wait until someone puts together a less hamfisted prototype. It's really funny how much EB/Gamestop is pushing this thing, too. I've had two register biscuits try to tell me how awesome the N-Gage is. My favorite part was when they told me the "battery problem" would be solved with an automatic software upgrade. That would be one hell of a trick. -etone-

Your Gamestop Sucks (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6853484)

The crew at my Gamestop will basically say "I'm not aloud to say anything bad about it *whisper* but this thing sucks." Maybe thats just because they know I know better, being a regular there and all.

comercial games aren't everything (1)

iamghetto (450099) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852593)

Lets face it, the GP32 hasn't been a juggernaut in the handheld scene. hell, most of you haven't even heard of it. There's a difference between a good underrated system and one that's going to flop. gp32 (which probably has the same fate as the dreamcast) is a great system and is much better than the gba in most departments. But here in north america most people need a cheaper way to satisfy their handheld needs.

But since it is a much smaller sized company than Nokia it has the option of keeping it's system localized to avoid any loss that might be incurred.
Nokia doesn't have this option, with the huge design flaws and poor games the plan to mass produce and distribute to the millions of people in north america???? HA! i'm gunna count the days until nokia stops production of the n-gage

Re:comercial games aren't everything (1)

RevAaron (125240) | more than 11 years ago | (#6853496)

The GP32 isn't anything special, which explains why most people haven't heard of it or bought into it.

For commercial games, I have a GBA. For running emulators and the like, I use my Dreamcast and PDA. I considered buying a GP32 when I was in the market for a GBA. Most people seem to use it for playing emulated games from NES and other systems, but my PDA already does that very well, better than the GP32.

For about the same price as a GP32, someone could buy a PocketPC PDA with the same screen resolution, more RAM/storage, a much faster processor, and more in the way of expansion. Sure, you miss out on the 5 commercial games made specifically for the GP32, but from what I've read, they're nothing special themselves.

The TapWave Helix may be something to watch, but we won't know until it materializes.

Credibility (3, Interesting)

wynterwynd (265580) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852608)

You know, I should be surprised by the tone this article takes, but somehow I'm not. More and more major game review sites are taking the corporate marketing juice and injecting it into articles. GameSpy's been teetering on the brink of corporate lapdog status for a while, looks like they're taking the final plunge.

As far as the article's content goes:

Don't be hatin'???

What is there to love here, exactly?

The article goes on to talk about the new concepts that these 2 systems are introducing, and I agree that these concepts are the up-and-coming as far as gaming goes (wide-area wireless, downloaded content). But they're not there yet. All too often gaming systems that are on the cutting edge of technology rely solely on new technology to sell the system, forgetting the minor details of good games and playability. Turbografx, 3DO, Jaguar, all with the latest technology when they came out, all now a brief burp in gaming history.

Also, just because these consoles have good innovations is NO REASON to buy the system. It IS a good reason to use this technology to make an system that's actually good. I believe the best thing to come out of this will be to break some ground for the next-gen systems to build on. But the systems themselves are likely to fall and fall hard.

On a side note, I'll believe the Phantom exists when I see a picture that's not CG.

N-Gage might have a chance.. (4, Insightful)

Inoshiro (71693) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852697)

Were it not a cellphone first and a gaming platform second. I've read the Nokia propoganda they send to the local video game chains. They expect people to come in, spend 450$ CDN on it, and then go home and play games that look marginally better than GBA games (note: GBA SP -- 150$ CDN) on a crappier button layout, while also required battery swapping to swap carts.

They expect that the bluetooth multiplayer and fact that you can upload your times in games via GPRS to their Nokia wireless service will be worth the 3x upfront cost. This is despite the obvious caveat that most cell plans with data transfer are stupidly expensive. The pamhplet says in bold, "User must have data transfer features on their cellular plan." I'm not paying an extra 10$ a month of cell fees for what I can spend half on (Xbox Live! centralized scoring and multiplayer) -- especially since an Xbox is only 250$ CDN. The extra 200$ I save not going with an N-Gage buys me Live! and a couple of games.

This mobile wireless niche Nokia wants to dominate doesn't exist. It won't exist for a few years yet, since GPRS and CPDP are still prohibitively expensive and unused by the general populace.

As for the Phantom -- only 1 company can be succesful on a the platform which is based around XP Embedded; Microsoft.

Upfront costs (1)

Mighty LoPan (633225) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852905)

It occurs to me that they're simply not willing to take the gamble that all other console makers do. They're trying to sell the hardware at a profit instead of a loss. Then when it fails and they discontinue it in six months or a year, they'll whine that "the market wasn't ready" - a thinly veiled attempt at blaming the public for their failure, when in reality it's their unwillingness to conform to the stardard console sales practice. If this thing was selling for $150 or $175 USD, it'd sell like hotcakes, but the people who have $450 to burn are too smart to pay that much.

Re:N-Gage might have a chance.. (1, Informative)

Mike Hawk (687615) | more than 11 years ago | (#6853243)

play games that look marginally better than GBA games

Alright, I've had just about enough of the untruths flying around here. Pre-hate if you must, but please be accurate.
Here is the GBA version of THPS:GBA []

And here is the N-Gage version:N-Gage []

C'mon folks, you don't have to like it, but at least be honest. The GBA version is barely the same game while the N-Gage version is exactly the same as the original.

Someone keeps modding me down for not towing the party line here, but its clear this device is not going to do well, so why keep lying about it?

My mistake. (1)

Inoshiro (71693) | more than 11 years ago | (#6853529)

I didn't double check the claims about N-Gage performance.

Re:N-Gage might have a chance.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6854264)

Mike Hawk has posted 10-20 comments that I recall in which he discusses how great Tony Hawk is on the NDump. Take a look at some past Slashdot stories on the NDump or the Gameboy and you're likely to find some comments regarding how sweet Tony Hawk looks. It's insipid nonsense.

Mike, we all know that Tony Hawk looks good on the NDump. The fact is that the system is at too high a price point for gamers to buy for handheld needs. And guess what - we get it - Tony Hawk looks good on this steaming pile of crap. We've got it. Don't post any more comments saying how great Tony Hawk looks. Just go buy the fucking game and play it to your heart's content. The NDump is a failure for many, many reasons and you should just accept it.

Re:N-Gage might have a chance.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6854395)

Didnt see fit to post with a login huh? Nice work. Have another glass of haterade, fanboy. See, I can do it to. Slashdot works!

Re:N-Gage might have a chance.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6854578)

I've marked you as a foe. You can figure it out if you're not a fucktard. Oh...wait...

But honestly, why should I waste my karma points letting people know how trite your posts are on a consistent basis? You post the same thing over and over again and I am just tired of it.

Re:N-Gage might have a chance.. (1)

Chris_Jefferson (581445) | more than 11 years ago | (#6857372)

Minor point. The GBA version gets a steady fps rating, whereas the N-gage version is jerky as hell (I won't pretend to know what the exact numbers are, but when things get busy the N-Gage version is dangerously close to unplayable)

Phantom is old hat... (1)

failrate (583914) | more than 11 years ago | (#6852944)

Back in the 90s, Sega had a game download service with a special cartridge modem. It failed.

Re:Phantom is old hat... (1)

dogbowl (75870) | more than 11 years ago | (#6853200)

Back in the 80s, Atari had a game download service with a special cartidge modem. It failed.

Re:Phantom is old hat... (1)

chaddarland (541271) | more than 11 years ago | (#6854836)

Back in the 90's, Nintendo had a game download service with a special cartridge modem. In Japan. It did pretty well.

Nail in the coffin (1)

Daetrin (576516) | more than 11 years ago | (#6853289)

Sony just announced that the PSP will have peripherals to add phone and camera functionality. []

And on top of that we already know the PSP will have wireless capability. []

Now what exactly does the N-Gage offer that the PSP won't have at a lower price and, with the possible exception of the cell phone part, better quality?

It's the games, stupid (2, Insightful)

skyknytnowhere (469520) | more than 11 years ago | (#6853941)

"Blah blah blah give the hardware a chance."

No, I'll give games a chance. I don't give a crap what hardware it's running, or how cool it's wireless networking is supposed to be. Unless it's running games I want to play, I'll pass.

Of course, the fact that the Phantom is probably an elaborate hoax has nothing to do with it- at least I've seen (crappy) games on the Ngage.


NGage (1)

bigredswitch (622835) | more than 11 years ago | (#6854162)

As much as I'd like the NGage to succeed (I develop mobile titles for a living) it simply won't. It's not a gaming platform, it's a funny looking, expensive phone that plays games. It has a lot of the right ingredients but the awkward, albeit high quality, screen coupled with a proprietary (read expensive) game cart tucked under the battery are just a few of the many annoyances. But, I hear you ask, what about low-cost Java gaming?! Well, J2ME on Nokia's Series 60, for most parts, is inferior to their low cost Series 40 devices. So we're just left with plain old Symbian stuff, which also runs on Nokia's other Series 60 devices, offering no real reason to stump up the cash for an NGage.

both of them are a collection of good ideas... (-1, Redundant)

zonker (1158) | more than 11 years ago | (#6854492)

but they are implemented in the strangest and shittiest ways possible. when you want to join the parade, go buy a real instrument. armfarting isn't going to win you a grammy.

Re:both of them are a collection of good ideas... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6856549)

when you want to join the parade, go buy a real instrument. armfarting isn't going to win you a grammy.

I dunno; Michael Bolton has a grammy...

Two Way Street (3, Insightful)

superultra (670002) | more than 11 years ago | (#6854524)

Gamers are enthusiasts. Sure, there are the fanboys that are predisposed to criticizing anything except for [insert random console or - gasp - operating system - here], but by and large gamers are interested in, well, games.

There are several products that fall right in the vein of the N-Gage and the Phantom that gamers never vehomently criticized. The late Indreama was received fairly well by both press and public. The Wonderswan remains a cult hit.
Gamers are generally excited about anything new.

But here's the thing. In regards to the N-gage, from the get-go Nokia has shown obliviously but inadvertantly flanted their ignorance of games, ranging from a website ripped straight from A&F, to outright insulting Nintendo. Moreover, the basic fundamental design of the portable reveals that it was not designed by anyone who had ever really played games, just looked at people playing games. The appearance of a Sony handheld on the horizon doesn't help either.

With the Phantom, what do you expect? It's called the *Phantom*. What's more, only one journalist claims to have actually seen it. It's pricey - $300 for the bottom of the line - and will be launching (snicker) at a time when the consoles will be no more than $100 a piece. Also, having an actual physical address and not swearing at story investigators over the phone might help.

Before we can take these newcomers seriously, they have to take us seriously. I think gamers are generally inclined to accept new things merely for the sake of novelty. Hell, look at how many gamers buy games on the first day before reviews even hit the web.

What does the N-gage have to do? Get more than rehash games. And dear god, fix that battery/cartridge issue. Stop advertising like you're mountain dew (for a good example, see Sony's ad campaigns)

The Phantom? Make a console and show it to more than one person.

This will seem like flamebait and flawed at best (1)

Iammadmak (460794) | more than 11 years ago | (#6854737)

How ironic that Gamespy just put up a dedicated NGage page a few weeks ago. Advertising dollars are whats important, not credibility as seen by this gamespy article. A few months before articles like these, the editors where probably making credible observations, not just an attempt to appease advertisers. I'm just bitter I guess, plus the N Gage adverts border on insulting.

Another handheld (Helix) (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 11 years ago | (#6855338)

First off, I think the N-Gage is dead. I've seen it, touched it and run screaming from it.

As far as the Phantom, that's some PR stunt. What's funny, is it's pretty damned good PR considering they keep us talking about it. Why do I get the feeling that just maybe, they've got nothing right now, but with all the buzz, they'll score enough investment cash to actually build it. I project a late 2004 release date for it, after they get some VC's who don't know gaming to jump in and save their bacon.

One thing I never hear mentioned in "vapor" discussions is the Helix, which seems like another "me too" console. Tapwave, yet another new company jumping into gaming, seems to think we'll fork over $300 (actually, they haven't given a final price) for a Palm with "enhanced gaming." Mind you, it's also supposed to use Bluetooth and other hot hot hot technologies. But as of yet, I've seen nothing but hype about it. Supposedly, it's the "bridge" between the GBA and a PDA.

The wave of the future. (1)

luekj (692478) | more than 11 years ago | (#6856211)

Is defeinetely UNSCREWING the back of my multi-everything handheld device just so I can stop playing some lousy port of Gex 3d (TM) long enough to 'blootooth' my college exam dealie to the nearest smartprinter that knows my credit card based on my RFID BACKPACK TOOTHPICK DISPENSER!!!

Yes, I said BACKPACK!.

Open Source Framework... (2, Informative)

burns210 (572621) | more than 11 years ago | (#6856759)

Ok, i think the open source/Linux community has an interest in gaming, but lack the funds for hardware production which keeps console systems out of our reach... So my idea? create a framework, of APIs, opengl, etc. with a nice gracphical development enviroment to program a full blown game. These games wouldn't run on a console, necesarily, almost a virtual machine(similar to a java program). This console software could be put onto a linux desktop box and run as a program, or even have an option as a bootable drive, that makes the desktop act as a client(restart your computer, if you have a linux-console-cd inserted, it will boot to your linux console).

That way, in the future, some company can take this console software and build a custom console box that is tailored to run the games/virtual machine really well.

Note: this would turn into almost a very custom distro, with the goal of playing linux-console games very well, and developing the tools to make coding new games very easy...

Just a thought

RANT! They dooomed, doooooomed I tell you. (1)

@madeus (24818) | more than 11 years ago | (#6857443)

They doomed items of crap that you will find as rare and very expensive collectors items on eBay in about 20 years time.

The Nokia abomination will only be bought by fuckwits, and those with exceptionally rose tinted glasses.

The current range of Palm and PocketPC based devices, including hybrid 'smart phones', are already better than this device - they can clock up twice the frame rates at a higher resolution.

Nokia slagged of Gameboy Advance players as part of their marketing hype - who in the name of sweet Jebus on a bike are they trying to market to?

You know this, but I'm going to say it again:



As for the phantom, yeah big fuckoff PC's retagged as 'consoles' but with DRM, that's what the industry wants. Just look how successful the XBox i....oh, wait. I haven't played any games on my XBox in months, let alone bought any software for it. I was starting to wonder if they were still *making* software. I actually got so board of waiting for Midtown Madness 3 to come out (having really liked the first two) that I shelved the entire console, and was apathetic when it was released because after looking at all the damn movies and screen shots for 6 months I felt like I'd played the game already.

The XBox is a superb console, but it's struggling. And that's with Microsoft behind it, remember they are the marketing geniuses that manage to sell us second rate criminally overpriced software year after year, and they are still struggling in the console market despite clearly having the best hardware going.

I bought a new PC with a Radeon 9700 Pro recently because I couldn't find any new software I wanted to play for my XBox or GameCube. AFAICT, the ONLY console platform with new software being released is the Gameboy advance as far as I can tell (and most of them are tedious sequels - e.g. Advance Wars 2, or ports of older games, Final Fight, Street Fighter Super Ninja Mega Turbo Speed III Ultimate Movie Edition). There are quite a few good Japanese import GC title's around, but I gave my GameCube away a while ago following being devastated by the tedious pixel perfect tedious jumping filler experience that was the obviously rushed to market game known as 'Super Mario Sunshine'.

The Phantom doesn't have a hope in hell. It's going to lose someone a LOT of money, and you've have to be irresponsibly optimistic to think you could make it a success. You need a huge, vast, marketing campaign to convince a sceptical Playstation hugging public to part with their cash and you need really good games.

Phantom investors deserve to go completely bankcrupt and have their familes forced to live in garages, they been warned, I have no sympathy for their blinding greed.

The N-Gage is... (1)

UfoZ (680310) | more than 11 years ago | (#6857619)

...a great idea gone horribly wrong.

The major flaws that I see with it are:

1. Removing the battery to change games? WTF? Who was the idiot who thought of this? Maybe if the phone design doesn't allow otherwise, then they should spend a month on redesigning it because this alone is a major turnoff.

2. Small vertical screen. This screen layout works well for a cell phone but not for games. Hell, they're selling a Sonic game. That's the one where you run around with the blue hedgehog at wicked fast speeds - horizontally. A vertical screen doesn't make sense for this type of game, you simply can't see where you're going. A vertical shooter, maybe, but Sonic? No.

3. Price. Given nokia's trend in phone pricing, I'd expect the n-gage to be horribly expensive and way out of the price range of the average consumer. Why would they get an overpriced phone with a few crappy games, when they gan go get a GBA (if they don't already own one) with an already huge game library?

Nokia really need to get their act together because this is just going to be a horrible flop.

Maybe the NGage ... (1)

inkless1 (1269) | more than 11 years ago | (#6861743)

but the Phantom is vaporware of the first degree and anyone who doesn't realize that believes what they read way too often.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?