×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

cancel ×
This is a preview of your comment

No Comment Title Entered

Anonymous Coward 1 minute ago

No Comment Entered

232 comments

Begging the question: (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025131)

How big are the sharks?

Re:Begging the question: (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025247)

Could anyone please explain what sharks have to do with this?

Re:Begging the question: (1, Informative)

SheldonYoung (25077) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025313)

It's a reference to the movie Austin Powers: Goldmember. Scottie gives his dad, Dr. Evil, "sharks with frickin' laser beams on their heads" in an attempt to win his affection.

Re:Begging the question: (0, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025338)

austin powers 1 was where that joke started, not austin powers 3.

Wow (4, Funny)

stratjakt (596332) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025149)

Hooray

Quantum computers, sure. I bet they'll even run Duke Nuk'Em Forever lan parties over IPv6.

Re:Wow (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025179)

Don't laugh... I actually spoke to a couple members of the DNF team, and they seemed to believe that quantum computing was just around the corner.

Re:Wow (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025287)

Something tells me we'll be using IPv8 by then!

Mirror (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025152)

Here's a mirror of the article:

gnuse.cx [physicsweb.org]

Enjoy!

laser (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025153)

Reminds me of 'Real Genious'...

I wonder when the military will take control of this technology... if they have not already.

Re:laser (3, Funny)

Ayaress (662020) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025294)

Yeah, because we all know how much the army needs to blow up those goddamn hydrogen nucleii.

So when do we get... (0, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025154)

...the single-atom Mini Me to hump it?

sweet (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025155)

1st post woohoo!

Re:sweet (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025227)

No, you get only failure YOU FAIL IT!!!!

But the bigger question is.. (4, Funny)

inteller (599544) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025157)

Will this incinerate ants better than my trusty magnifying glass?

Nope. Sorry. (5, Funny)

FreeLinux (555387) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025213)

But, it may prove useful in surgery on ants and may even be used for tatoo removal on ants. This is especially important for those ants who now regret the indiscretions of their teenage years.

Re:Nope. Sorry. (1)

KDan (90353) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025325)

ROFLMAO haha you bastard... you made me chuckle out loud... now all my colleagues are going to think I'm reading slashdot or something...

Daniel

Re:But the bigger question is.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025485)

actually, the question should be, does it run lin *whack*

hi (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025158)

hi

but..... (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025160)

is it hotter than hot grits in my pants? FP!

Re:but..... (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025273)

You get no hotgrits and no FP! You fail it!!!

Here we go again. (0, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025163)

Tell you what, I don't want to hear anymore about quantum computers or cold fusion until someone actually ships a quantum computer powered by cold fusion. A laptop form factor would be preferred but, is not required.

Mk?

Re:Here we go again. (-1, Flamebait)

stratjakt (596332) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025435)

When Apple ships their own version of it, 5 years after the first one is shipped, then slashdot will report it crediting Jobs as the inventor.

All slashbots will rejoice in its quantum gayness.

Re:Here we go again. (1)

TheBeardIsRed (695409) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025456)

My first thought to that reply...

Why in the hell would you want such a terrible web development language used on a quantum computer? ;)

so.... (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025165)

a one little itty bit computer?

Check out ThinkGeek's single-atom laser pointer! (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025167)

Go ahead, mod me down! (-1, Offtopic)

yotto (590067) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025170)

I for one welcome our new caesium overlords.

Re:Go ahead, mod me down! (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025201)

okay.

MOD PARENT UP +5 Troll (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025210)

I AM A STUPID CASESIM FAG TOO, LOL :)~~~~

Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

I YEL AT WAH TWAG FAG I WANT!1

Rubbish (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025176)


why does every science experiment have to throw in buzzwords such as "may be use in quantum computers" or "may help a cure for cancer"

until any of this is a reality or someone actually builds it, its all bullshit, maybe im fed up of scinetific experiments with no purpose until they throw in the critical
"nanotubes" "space elevators" "quantum computers" "cure for cancer"

Re:Rubbish (1)

mikehilly (653401) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025232)

Agreed! Aything *MAY* be used with anything else. Why do they always put it in there?

This just in: This post MAY be modded up/down.

Re:Rubbish (5, Insightful)

canajin56 (660655) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025238)

why does every science experiment have to throw in buzzwords such as "may be use in quantum computers" or "may help a cure for cancer"
Because "it's nifty" doesn't get you grant money.

Re:Rubbish (5, Funny)

grub (11606) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025264)


why does every science experiment have to throw in buzzwords such as "may be use in quantum computers" or "may help a cure for cancer"

A 12 gauge shotgun could be used in cancer treatments. Of course making sure you only blast out the cancer cells is the really hard part.

At home with the amoeba (5, Funny)

Channard (693317) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025307)

A 12 gauge shotgun could be used in cancer treatments. Of course making sure you only blast out the cancer cells is the really hard part.

Well, that's where the nano-rednecks come in.

Re:Rubbish (0, Redundant)

KDan (90353) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025486)

Easy. Just mount a low-intensity x-ray (or similar hard radiation) laser on each shotgun pellet, arrange them in a nice spherical shell around the patient, all pointing towards the centre, and make sure the tumour is right at the centre of the shell. All the low, harmless intensities will add up to some real stuff in the middle et voila! Radiation therapy with a shotgun!

Daniel

Re:Rubbish (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025439)

RE: >

maybe that wanted to catch a buzz :)

Re:Rubbish (1)

Lumpy (12016) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025446)

why does every science experiment have to throw in buzzwords such as "may be use in quantum computers" or "may help a cure for cancer"

because the buzzwords, "may be used in the porn industry" or "may help find a cure for Genital herpies" just is not what the public want's to hear yet coming out of the physics research labs...

Silly, I know.... but true!

Re:Rubbish (1)

weeboo0104 (644849) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025502)

maybe im fed up of scinetific experiments with no purpose until they throw in the critical
"nanotubes" "space elevators" "quantum computers" "cure for cancer"


As opposed to any /. posting with the critical "Natalie Portman", "Hot Grits", "In Soviet Russia...", "Beowulf Cluster", or "You insensitive clod!",

Wow (5, Funny)

CaptBubba (696284) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025185)

This is simply amazing. I'm trying to picture all the machinery and people that went into getting that one atom to light up.

And now the physicists hand the engineers the huge task: "Ok, we got it to work, you get it to do something usefull"

Re:Wow (1)

javelinco (652113) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025228)

Even the SUMMARY said what this will be used for - creating a Quantum computer. Keep up, please! :)

Re:Wow (5, Funny)

EulerX07 (314098) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025421)

SCIENTIST : With this you could create a Quantum computer.

ENGINEER : Uhhm, it's not that simple...

SLASHDOTTER : Yes it is! Keep up please!

Re:Wow (1)

whopis (465819) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025401)

Agreed. After all, how useful can it be until they develop a single atom laser capable of emitting a beam of pure anti-matter?

GoogleNews (5, Informative)

Leffe (686621) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025188)

Here's a handy link with all the articles on GoogleNews:

http://news.google.com/news?q=single+atom+laser [google.com]

Re:GoogleNews (3, Insightful)

TopShelf (92521) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025462)

With any luck, the editors would start putting links like this into the articles themselves.

*SMACK*

That is, when they're not too busy submitting dupes without checking for messy details like facts, grammer, spelling, etc.

If they build it... (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025192)

We will come?

Not big enough. (5, Funny)

caluml (551744) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025203)

I want a laser that can burn a 200 metre-wide hole through the moon from Earth.
What's that you say? Why? What do you mean, why?

Re:Not big enough. (4, Funny)

sharkey (16670) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025376)

I want a laser that can burn a 200 metre-wide hole through the moon from Earth.

Or at least criss-cross campus leading co-eds to the sign it's lighting proclaiming one BITCHIN' pool party.

Oh yeah....ooohhhhhhhhh yeah BOW BOW (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025211)

Party goin' down!

In other news (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025212)

NetBSD has been ported to this single cesium atom.

Finally, I have the weapon I need ... (4, Funny)

burgburgburg (574866) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025241)

to conquer the Nanobot world. I WILL rule in Nanobotia. Benevolently, but firmly.

But should even one of those Nanobots cross me, ZZAPP!

Ah yes.. (3, Insightful)

adeyadey (678765) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025243)

...so such a device may be used to control a quantum computer..

Ah, that would be the quantum computer on board the manned space expedition to Mars, power by a fission-reactor ion-drive. Back home we can watch it via our ubiquetous videophones, or our Linux powered desktops, which can run applications with true Artificial Intelligence. All our homes will be supplied by nuclear electricity that is too cheap to meter. There will be peace in Isreal.. etc..

Re:Ah yes.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025342)

we can watch it via our ubiquetous videophones

While they aren't yet ubiquitous, they are pretty common over here in the UK.

our Linux powered desktops

I'm using one to type this.

All our homes will be supplied by nuclear electricity

That's not new.

Re:Ah yes.. (1)

adeyadey (678765) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025411)

we can watch it via our ubiquetous videophones

While they aren't yet ubiquitous, they are pretty common over here in the UK.

So do I, er, common? Mind you I do live in Royston Vasey.. :-)

our Linux powered desktops

I'm using one to type this.

Tubs insists we stick to our ZX81.

All our homes will be supplied by nuclear electricity

That's not new.

Although hardly likely to be "too cheap to meter"..

Re:Ah yes.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025392)

It's unfortunate that there isn't a "-1: Being an asshole" moderation.

Re:Ah yes.. (5, Insightful)

Scarblac (122480) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025397)

Ah, that would be the quantum computer on board the manned space expedition to Mars, power by a fission-reactor ion-drive. Back home we can watch it via our ubiquetous videophones, or our Linux powered desktops, which can run applications with true Artificial Intelligence. All our homes will be supplied by nuclear electricity that is too cheap to meter. There will be peace in Isreal.. etc..

We live in such interesting times that everyone is taking everything for granted. The idea of a quantum computer was born in 1982 (history of Quantum computing [ic.ac.uk]). Now, just over twenty years later, we already have brought bits of the idea into practice - that is stunningly fast, compared with history. Quantum computers are an extremely advanced idea.

Charles Babbage got the idea of a general computer around 1812 (Babbage [st-and.ac.uk]), but one wasn't built until World War II.

So after only 20 years we already have done some tiny, extremely simple calculations involving a few qubits. Very far from being useful, and still totally amazing that we've come so far. Most ideas take twenty years to become widely known before they're looked at seriously.

So Slashdot readers compare it to Duke Nukem and flying cars, and laugh. These times are so interesting that everyone is jaded.

Wow! (1)

Teahouse (267087) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025244)

All I can think to say is wow! This is pretty awesome when you consider the ramifications. QM just took an interesting step forward.

Re:Wow! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025321)

You mean QC (computing)...

Cesium in quantum computers... (4, Funny)

DrEldarion (114072) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025257)

Cesium in your computer, huh?

Now there's a good reason not to spill coffee at your desk...

-- Dr. Eldarion --

How does this fit with Quantum computing (5, Informative)

fruey (563914) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025259)

(Blatantly stolen from link on the right of the article)

A system with one or more individual atoms at rest and strongly coupled to a single mode of the electromagnetic field is ideal for testing fundamental concepts of quantum computing and quantum information processing (see Physics World 1998 March). Indeed, Scott Parkins, now at the University of Auckland, and collaborators at the JILA Laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, and Caltech first proposed this system as a highly efficient quantum interface in 1993. Using the strong coupling of an atom to a single photon, it should be possible to map a quantum bit at rest from an atomic medium onto a propagating light field, and vice versa. In other words, this scheme could allow quantum information to be sent from one place to another. The first experimental results in this direction were obtained very recently by Markus Hennrich and co-workers at the MPQ. Moreover, two atoms in the cavity should make it possible to realize a "controlled NOT gate", the elementary building block of a quantum computer.

But it does answer the question I was asking myself...

Like this (3, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025340)

/--------\
Cesium atom ---- Internet ---> quantum computing
\--------/

Obviously you've never written a business proposal before.

Re:Like this (4, Funny)

orthogonal (588627) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025400)

> /--------\
> Cesium atom ---- Internet ---> quantum computing
> \--------/

> Obviously you've never written a business proposal
> before.

No, obviously YOU have not. The proper proposal looks like this:

/--------\
Collect underpants ---> Cesium atom ---- Internet ---> ??? ---> quantum computing
\--------/

Re:Like this (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025454)

The "collect underpants" part is assumed, and the "???" part is synonymous with quantum computing. Now I just got to peddle this business plan to a VC. Did I mention that the cesium atom was synergistic and had a high stickiness eyeball factor? This is way beyond clicks and bricks.

"Caesium"? (1)

Cecil (37810) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025260)

I learned it spelled as Cesium, and everything I've ever seen spells it that way. Is this just some over-spelling, or is it something like the Aluminum vs. Aluminium spelling/pronunciation conflict?

Re:"Caesium"? (1)

fruey (563914) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025324)

It's probably from Caesar, the Roman, or something.

It's actually in the spelling, as Csium, I expect.

Re:"Caesium"? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025349)

I believe it's similar to the Aluminum / Aluminium thing - I learnt it as caesium...

Indians spell it as "maize" (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025478)

Not the Java job stealing ones - the real ones.

Imagine? (5, Funny)

Slicebo (221580) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025269)

Can you imagine what you could make with a Beowulf cluster of these?

A FLASHLIGHT!

What's the point? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025284)

This is way too small to be an effective weapon. The future is in larger chemical lasers.

I don't know (3, Funny)

panurge (573432) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025286)

Some of the ruby rods we were getting in the early 80s were such poor quality, I wouldn't be surprised if they were single atom lasers. Pity we didn't know it would one day be leading edge research.

I know, I know, I actually read the article. I can remember when lasers were interesting, before they were just cheap modern replacements for phonograph needles.

SHIT EXPLODES OUT OF MY ASS INTO YOUR MOM'S FACE (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025292)

happy hannuka you fucking limey spics!!!!!!
!!!!1

C+ : needs improvement! (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025418)

Dear Sir,

Your latest submission to our publication was your best attempt so far. But there is still quite a bit of improvement neccessary for acceptance by our editorial board.

You've successfully includeded scatology, perversion and slurs against Jews, Englisman and Hispanics. You have unfortunately neglected : American Indians, blacks, homosexuals, amputees and cat fanciers. Please correct this oversight, and resubmit your attempt to our editorial board by the deadline for the next issue.

Wishing you success in your endeavor.

the secret slashdot troll editorial board

construction (4, Interesting)

colinleroy (592025) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025308)

I wonder if the term "constructed" is really relevant, considering they used a single atom ;-)

Re:construction (1)

Ayaress (662020) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025351)

The cesium atom is just like the ruby from a ruby laser. There are other components, including, according to the article, at least two OTHER laseres, presumably of the multi-atom variety. So that begs the question: Is it really an accomplishment when you use two lasers to make a WEAKER laser?

every speck of light counts (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025356)

you won't need any billyonerrors gizmos to manipulate light, or information.

consult with/trust in yOUR creator. more breathing. seek others of non-aggressive behaviours/intentions. then you'll see the light?

meanwhile, lookout bullow.

coming soon to/already on, yOUR desktop/network?:

Due to excessive bad posting from this IP or Subnet, comment posting has temporarily (permanently, if we could figure out how to do it) been disabled. If it's you, consider this a chance to sit in the timeout corner. If it's someone else, this is a chance to hunt them down. If you think this is unfair, we don't care.

alert: you've been lax in yOUR payper liesense 'upgrades', you're out.

alert: there's a rumour that you've been badmouthing/lowrating the corepirate nazis, & the naykid furor of the felonious kingdumb, you're out.

alert: looks like yOUR kids have been listening to music again, you're out.

alert: although you appear to be browsing regularly, you've failed to make a purchase recently, you're out.

consider this a chance to stare at your monitor screen, & plan how you can become .compliant. if you think that you are already compliant, & it's somebody else, consider this a chance to rat them out, to gain re-admission to the onLIEn wwwhirled again, (c SourceForgerIE(tm) all rights reserved, you have none).

etc... lookout bullow. these foulcurrs haven't a clue yet, as to what J. Public can do, once he's peaced off. they live in a tiny wwworld, consisting of only their owned greed/fear based goals. they should get ready to see the light.

we're building a vessel that floats on almost any suBStance.

as to the newclear power/planet/population rescue initiative:

it's all free (as in survival), & available immediately to you/all of US.

as you can maybe already see, yOUR survival/success is not the least bit dependent on the gadgets/combinations of the greed/fear based corepirate nazis, & their phonIE ?pr? ?firm? buyassed /.puppets.

consult with/trust in yOUR creator. more breathing. vote with yOUR wallet (somtimes that means not buying anything, a notion previously unmentioned buy the greed/fear/war mongers). seek others of non-aggressive/positive behaviours/intentions. stop wasting anything/being frivolous. that's the spirit.

investigate the newclear power plan. J. Public et AL has yet to become involved in open/honest 'net communications/commerce in a meaningful way. that's mostly due to the MiSinformation suppLIEd buy phonIE ?pr? ?firm?/stock markup FraUD execrable, etc...

truth is, there's no better/more affordable/effective way that we know of, for J. to reach other J.'s &/or their respective markets.

the overbullowned greed/fear based phonIE marketeers are self eliminating by their owned greed/fear/ego based evile MiSintentions. they must deny the existence of the power that is dissolving their ability to continue their self-centered evile behaviours.

as the lights continue to come up, you'll see what we mean. meanwhile, there are plenty of challenges, not the least of which is the planet/population rescue (from the corepirate nazi/walking dead contingent) initiative.

EVERYTHING is going to change, despite the lameNT of the evile wons. you can bet your .asp on that. when the lights come up, there'll be no going back, & no where to hide.

we weren't planted here to facilitate/perpetuate the excesses of a handful of Godless felons. you already know that? yOUR ONLY purpose here is to help one another. any other pretense is totally false.

pay attention (to yOUR environment, for example). that's quite affordable, & leads to insights on preserving life as it should/could/will be again. everything's ALL about yOUR motives.

that old tune title (hope we don't get 'busted' for using it) "make the world go away", takes on new/varied meaning in these times.

the prevalent notion that 'everything will be taken care of' without yOUR knowledge/participation is insidiously misleading.

in our estimation, the biggest 'threat' against US (aside from continuing to fire bullinedly into the 'crowd', whilst demanding applause), would be a failure to recognize our 'role' in the problems. we're victims for sure, but whoare ALL the perpetrators (see also: corepirate nazi puppets), gets lost in the ?pr? ?firm? generated propaganda spew.

consult with/trust in yOUR creator. seek others of non-aggressive behaviours/intentions. that's the spirit.

the lights ARE coming up now. pay attention (to yOUR heart, for example). that could lead to new ways (see also: newclear power plan) of thinking about/dealing with, the needs/rights of others EVERYWHERE on the planet.

having the attention span of a gnat, & similar ambitions, might be ok if you are just planning to be a consumer/type one liners.

take care of each other, you're all we've got. we're here for you. get ready to see the light.--

worth reading, again, with feeling.

"It takes a long time to teach the judges, legislators, and public to understand technology. Right now, they're getting a strong dose of "education" on the Internet's threats and harms, and not hearing so much about its potential. Shouts of "piracy" often outweigh consideration of how we might communicate with more open media formats, but judges like Stephen Wilson in the Grokster case are starting to listen through the shouting. We're encouraging more people to think about how the law shapes technological innovation, how the technology itself can foster creativity, and then to do something about it to advance the public interest."--

"The stability of the large world house which is ours will involve a revolution of values to accompany the scientific and freedom revolutions engulfing the earth. We must rapidly begin the shift from a "thing"-oriented society to a "person"-oriented society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism and militarism are incapable of being conquered. A civilization can flounder as readily in the face of moral and spiritual bankruptcy as it can through financial bankruptcy."

I love you, dammit (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#7025399)

Answer me, you cheating bastard. It's HER again, isn't it?

Re:every speck of light counts (-1, Offtopic)

JessLeah (625838) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025469)

Can someone PLEASE explain these posts? Is this some sort of 'bot' or 'Dissociated Press' program run amuck?

Chip Manufacturers (1, Insightful)

Bruha (412869) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025412)

I'm sure Intel and others are probably going to be highly interested in this.

Finally! (2, Funny)

JWhitlock (201845) | more than 10 years ago | (#7025445)

The emitted light is very weak but highly ordered, so such a device may be used to control a quantum computer.

I, for one, can now overthrow our quantum computer masters!

Load More Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...