Slashback: Unstranding, Xecurity, Spurning 228
Multi-player markets are a good thing. Indiana University seems to be one of the first big fish to publicly announce a license agreement with Progeny's Transition Service. This service provides updates for RedHat 7.2, 7.3, and 8.0 beyond January 1st 2004, and RedHat 9 after May 1, 2004. According to the press release, this will allow for 'a flexible migration path as the University considers various options regarding Linux distributions during the coming year.'"
But I thought MPlayer ... Simon Bysshe writes "In response to some complaints about the WMV encoding of the recent pro-gaming film 'Intel Extreme Edition Challenge' (featured here on Slashdot). Intel have requested that the film also be encoded as a DIVX file especially for Slashdot. This divx file can now be downloaded here."
More on (At Least) 100 Years Of Powered Human Flight relbs was one of many to submit word (as reported by MIT News) of a replica of the Wright brothers' Flyer perched above the Great Dome early yesterday morning, and relbs adds a link to additional photos, too.
They had better luck getting off the ground than did those trying to actually fly a Wright flyer: CrazyTalk writes "As a follow-on to the earlier story, the much-ballyhooed attempt to recreate the first flight of the Wright's literally fell flat."
Maltese Falcon writes with another candidate for First Powered Flight. "Or was it Gustave Weiskopf (aka Gustave Whitehead)? There are many claims that he flew up to 2 yrs before the Wright Bros. NPR's report yesterday seemed to imply almost paranoia as far as a conspiracy to why the NASM only recognizes the Wrights, but this link provides more info on why this could be true. Look here for another article."
Speaking of audacious pilots, jcenters writes "An earlier Slashdot story reported that Australian adventurer Jon Johanson was trapped in Antarctica, and scientists stationed there refused to sell him fuel. Reuters is reporting that Johanson has now obtained fuel from a British rival, but weather conditions are preventing his departure. Johanson hopes to leave by the end of the weekend."
BlameFate writes that "British adventurer, Polly Vacher has allowed Johanson to use her pre-stored fuel at the base after her expedition was forced to be cancelled. Fox News has the scoop. Choice quote from the head of NZ's Antarctic Research dept: 'Polly's trip was well organized and properly planned,' he said. 'It is ironic that she is now assisting a stranded pilot who embarked upon an ill-prepared and secret flight over the South Pole.'"
If something happens in Berkeley, does it count as a "real world" experience? codythefreak writes to deflect certain barbs lately directed at the security level of Mac OS X: "Working as a sysadmin at UC Berkeley's Residential Computing, since we serve more than 6,000 clients living in the dorms, we tend to know the major computing trends. There are 5,120 registered Windows XP machines in our system, and our staff have logged 2,452 duty logs to assist them (about one in two). On the other hand, there are 341 Mac OS X machines, and only 56 duty logs (about one in six). If we restrict these to virus and security related duty logs: Windows XP has 491 (about one in ten) and OS X has 2 (less than one in a hundred)!"
(See also this well-reasoned response to the recent OS X criticism.)
Was it the tail? Really, is the pointy tail a deal-breaker? Mister.de points out this Seattle Post-Intelligencer story which says "VMware Inc., a business-software maker that is being acquired by EMC Corp. for $635 million, turned down an offer last year from Microsoft Corp.
'"We were unable to come to terms, so they bought out our distant competitor, Connectix" Corp., said Diane Greene, VMware's chief executive officer and co-founder.'"
Alas, we hardly knew ye. dlc3007 writes "The Register has published the results of the JenniCam Poetry Competition. There is little funnier in the world than creative geeks pouring their hearts and souls into 'a haiku or limerick lamenting the demise of JenniCam.'" I can think of some things ...
Battlestar Galactica 2003: Series Highly Likely, Say Recent Rumors Cliff writes: "Syfy Portal reports that officials for the Sci-Fi channel are likely to announce that the new Battlestar Galactica will become a series, most likely to air as early as Summer of 2004. No official announcement has yet been made, but since the 'mini-series' is Sci-Fi channel's third highest rated program, it is assumed that such an announcement will be made before the end of 2003, if they are going to keep options on the major actors. Personally, I'm looking forward to the show, as long as they stay away from monkeys in robot-dog suits!"
And let's not forget (Score:2, Informative)
[com.com]
Real is suing Microsoft for abusing its OS monopoly in digital audio/video markets
Re:And let's not forget (Score:2)
Please somebody mod this up, it's a great read
Re:And let's not forget (Score:2)
Probably because these cases only seem to pop up when a company is teetering on the edge of going out of business.
Re:And let's not forget (Score:3, Funny)
I mean, someone with a high market share raking in the dough is clearly not being damaged by antitrust behaviour. Likewise, you wouldn't expect a mugging victim to have a wallet full of cash.
Apologies. Logic and reason on Slashdot when I'm supposed to quote Ann Rand and whine about big bad government regulating the tech industry. I know.
Whine whine whine.
Pollys quote was a little different... (Score:5, Informative)
It just seems to me as though there's a lot more going on behind the scenes than the scientists out there are all admitting to...
Simon.
Re:Pollys quote was a little different... (Score:2)
Planning, etc (Score:2, Interesting)
Many people somehow think that Polly Vacher's flight around the world is better planned and organized than Jon Johanson's trip.
She, like Jon Johanson, had made sure that fuel was available at all her planned stops, but she did not make sure that fuel was available at all possible diversion airfields (the list of planned legs on her web site shows that McMurdo was a planned fuel stop).
She, like Jon Johanson, ran into higher than expected winds over Antartica, and had to divert. She, like Jon Johanson, di
Completely outdated article (Score:4, Informative)
Q.
Re:Completely outdated article (Score:4, Informative)
ninemsn [ninemsn.com.au]
Wow. Slashdot is really on the ball today.
Re:Pollys quote was a little different... (Score:2, Interesting)
Also, he was scarcely stranded. He had been offered a ride back to NZ in an Air Force Hercules, and he could have arranged to have the plane shipped back later.
When he did get the fuel, it is telling that he did not continue on to Argentina as per his 'plan', but went straight
Re:Pollys quote was a little different... (Score:3, Insightful)
Naval vessels cost a lot to run whether they are at sea or not. Salaries are paid, maintenance is carried out. More often than not these rescues provide real life training for the crews that is not possible in simulations. Actual cost is nil, it means things are done (eg training) out of schedule - but they would be done anyway.
Re:Pollys quote was a little different... (Score:2, Informative)
The idiot had no business being there a
Re:Pollys quote was a little different... (Score:3, Funny)
/ back! (Score:5, Funny)
Puts on Robot Helmet.
(Robot Voice) Welcome to Battlestar Galatica Forum.
JenniCam Winners (Score:5, Funny)
Jennicam is dead
good. For so many reasons
voyeurs sob. goodbye.
Jennicam is dead.
Good for so many reasons.
Voyeurs sob goodbye.
and...
We wanted to see Jenni's muff
But PayPal's now said that's enough
So no view of the rug
'Cause they've pulled the plug
Fuck PayPal, they can get stuffed
This should have been the winner.. (Score:5, Funny)
Heart! betray me not again!
Will I see a tit?
DIVX != MPEG4 (Score:5, Insightful)
Sorry, pet peeve, I'm done now.
Re:DIVX != MPEG4 (Score:2)
Actually, I'm glad you mentioned this, because I had no clue what DIVX was. I read the article and was like, "I don't [penny-arcade.com] have [penny-arcade.com] a [penny-arcade.com] DivX [penny-arcade.com] player, oh [penny-arcade.com] well [penny-arcade.com] ."
If the /. "editors" actually lived to to their claimed titles, they could correct these things.
Re:DIVX != MPEG4 (Score:2)
Then what are they editing? Fixing wrong things is what editors em>do. Or at least, add some commentary.
Re:DIVX != MPEG4 (Score:5, Informative)
MPEG4 files (i.e. files generated so that any MPEG4 compliant viewer can play them) have the extension MP4. DivX is a mutated version of MPEG4, thus it deserves the seperate distinction.
In other words, I'm having trouble seeing the justification of your nitpick here.
"Maybe we should call "HTML" "MicroSoft Web Content" if I use Microsoft Notepad to generate it, but "Emacs Markup-language" if I use Emacs."
This is a bad example. There is, however, code that only works in IE and not in other browsers. It's code that only works in IE, so it wouldn't be all that improper to informally call it MSML. Nobody's doing that, but it'd be hard to nail them on it.
It's all about standards compliance here, and DivX does not conform to Mpeg4. You have to tell it specifically to make an MPEG4 file, and when it does, it saves it with the MP4 extension.
So, yeah, save it for when somebody calls an MP4 file DivX.
Re:DIVX != MPEG4 (Score:3, Informative)
Re:DIVX != MPEG4 (Score:2)
Hey, that's a pretty good link!
Scroll to the bottom, and you see the link to the old Circuit City "Divx" players is "the-doa.com"... It's a wonder anyone invested in it with a foreshadowing name like that!
Re:DIVX != MPEG4 (Score:4, Informative)
I don't think anyone is calling MPEG4 video (in a modified MOV/MP4 container with AC3 audio) a Divx file.
OTOH, what everyone *is* calling a Divx file, is very specific... Divx is MPEG4 video, fit into an AVI container, and almost always with MPEG-1 Layer3 audio. I think the designation "Divx" is quite appropriate for that.
Look (Score:2)
Sometimes a term gets used which isn't really correct, but give the same information to 99% of users.
Divx is becoming the way that people say MPEG-4.
Now you can complain, and you would be correct, but it would be to no avail.
You'll only give yourself hypertension, and an ulcer.
again you are correct, I know you are correct, and I agree with you. However somtime popular usage becomes the defacto standard.
Battlestar Galactica (Score:2)
Re:Battlestar Galactica (Score:2)
Dodgy data (Score:5, Insightful)
The unwashed masses don't make a choice, and thus get WinXP by default - of course they will need more support.
Re:Dodgy data (Score:5, Interesting)
Macintosh computers are marketed towards people who are new to using computers, and to the casual user. If anything, Mac users tend to be less technical than the general population.
Re:Dodgy data (Score:2)
Re:Dodgy data (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Dodgy data (Score:2)
Re:Dodgy data (Score:4, Insightful)
It could be... but in my experience the average Windows user knows they are always one click away from disaster and really don't want to reinstall the OS again. Although XP sucks less, as the saying goes, non-newbies still have deep psychological wounds from previous versions of Windows.
Re:Dodgy data (Score:3, Insightful)
OS X is as easy to use (in my opinion) as the previous Mac OSes were. There's just a lot more g
Re:Dodgy data (Score:4, Interesting)
I would add that if they're using OSX, they're probably using it for a very specific reason, illustration for example. If all that Mac does is run Illustrator all day, then no, you're not going to need a lot of support calls on it unless something fails.
Anyway, the point of my post isn't to defend XP, but merely to point out that these numbers aren't qualified well enough to draw any real conclusions. An OSX zealot could bend them into the shape of "Windows is a crappy bug riddled OS", whereas a Windows zealot could spin it like "OSX has less software, therefore it has fewer chances to break." The truth is probably somewhere in the middle, but since we don't know much more than the most drastic numbers in the vaguest sense, it would be ill advised to take this data and try to win an argument with it.
Re:Dodgy data (Score:2)
Fair enough, but to be equally fair enough, you need to consider:
(1) Almost no one doesn't use email and a web browser these days. Even if they are mostly doing design work.
(2) It seems likely to me that most PC users stick to a small subset of applicati
What? (Score:2)
If you've followed my posts, you'd know that I'm a regular apple basher. But the fact is, Microsoft's security sucks ass. And it needs to be a lot better then Apple's security in practice because so many attacks are targeted towards windows.
Think about it
Re:Dodgy data (Score:2)
But we can be pretty sure that they are browsing the web, sending email, and using word processors. These same activities on Windows expose you to viruses, trojans, etc.
And you're more likely to have problems runing DTP all day than with simple office apps, malware aside. (Problems importing files, colour space, printing, scratch space, fonts, fonts and fonts.)
Re:Dodgy data (Karma to Burn) (Score:2)
If this is for in-house uses, or for unix/linux machines, then it would make some sense. Otherwise, it just sounds dumb.
Kind of like learning
Uh dude, mac's selling point is simplicity (Score:5, Interesting)
Windows people buy Pontiac Firebirds thinking they are powerful but really getting 4 cylinder peice of maintinence hell.
linux users are like fiat owners. And people who re-program their honda's computers. Fun cars if you can keep up with the tweaking and constant search for parts.
by the way did any one read that rebuttal on the DNS security hole. After you get past the neener neener bit the discussion on the DNS protocol makes the guy who reported it and the Slashdotters who slammed mac look like total idiots.
Re:Uh dude, mac's selling point is simplicity (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Uh dude, mac's selling point is simplicity (Score:2)
ROTFLMAO!
Fix
It
Again
Tony
...and yet, I bought an Alfa after I crashed the 124 spider
Re:That's hillarious: fiat = linux (Score:2)
Some of us are just lucky, I guess
-WS
Re:That's hillarious: fiat = linux (Score:2)
Re:That's hillarious: fiat = linux (Score:2)
Re:That's hillarious: fiat = linux (Score:2)
Re:That's hillarious: fiat = linux (Score:2)
Re:That's hillarious: fiat = linux (Score:2)
Myself though, Debian, VW Karmann Ghia, Hyundai.
Didn't have much choice on the Hyundai, but I used to drive a '67 VW type III, and identify with that a lot more. Fun to drive, well engineered and easy to fix.
OSX, Volvo, Volvo (Score:2)
Re:Dodgy data (Score:2)
What, mac users are more technical now? Dispite OSX's unix core, Apple still appeals to non-techies, and is marketed twards them.
Even if you excluded viruses, there are a lot more 'scripts' for the script kiddies to use against windows. Even if their theoretical security is e
Berkeley (Score:4, Funny)
Pointy Tail? (Score:3, Funny)
Hmmm. I don't get it? The header seemed to refer to some potential BSD deal that was quashed, but the story is talking about VMWare, Microsoft and EMC Corp.
What gives? Did I miss something?
Re:Pointy Tail? (Score:2)
as an indicator that there was a tail stuffed
in monkeyboy's pants.
Steam powered engines? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Steam powered engines? (Score:2)
Of course, that steam engine was used (or not) in the flight that supposedly took place 4 years before the Wright's first flight. The much better documented flights 2 years later "were made by Whitehead in a monoplane powered with a kerosene burning engine." [deepsky.com], using something like this [deepsky.com] three-cylinder, 18 horsepower, four-cycle motor constructed by Whitehead, ap
Re:Steam powered engines? (Score:2)
Actually, it did fly. Three times earlier this month. Just not today. It had been raining all morning on the anniversary and the humidity was too high for the finicky engine.
Re:Engine_s_? (Score:3, Informative)
Funnier than a... (Score:5, Funny)
-- I can think of some things
"Full body cavity searches" is an easy start to what would turn out to be a pretty lengthy list.
Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned..." (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm sorry, but saying "but the RFC doesn't provide security, so it's not our fault that our setup isn't secure" is no good. The mistake Apple is making is precisely that if you try to build a secure system whose security depends on a non-secure protocol, you can't possibly wind up with a system that's secure.
This has nothing to do with Microsoft, and everything to do with bad system design. It'd be fine if Apple was using DHCP to get the address of the LDAP server, and then verifying the identity of the LDAP server, but they aren't currently doing this. This is what's missing. It is really, honest to god, a problem that Apple is shipping systems wide open like this. It is easy for me to get root on your laptop if you haven't disabled LDAP passwords (which are enabled by default) and you bring it onto an open network.
I agree with the general idea that the PC guy who wrote the article was out of line, but that doesn't mean we should turn a blind eye to an actual security problem just because it's on MacOS X and not on Windows. If we do that often enough, we'll be fulfilling this guy's prophecy.
And I'm sorry, but I don't care if leaving this security hole makes Macs a tiny bit easier to administer. Get over it. The first time someone compromises all the Macs on your network by setting up a fake LDAP/DHCP service, you'll be wishing you'd had the opportunity to spend a minute longer setting up each shiny new Mac in exchange for spending an hour less rebuilding each compromised Mac.
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:3, Informative)
Plus, if you're willing to spend an extra minute setting up security, you could always use it to turn the damn option off. It's not exactly hard. You get a whole 55 seconds left over to do other things. Like maybe securing that damn XP box that people keep installing rogue DHCP servers on. Yees
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:4, Informative)
The problem is that the average user never reads bugtraq, and has no idea that s/he needs to do something special to avoid getting rooted while drinking a latte at Starbucks.
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:2)
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:2)
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:2)
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:2)
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:2)
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:2)
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:2)
Security's about stopping The Bad Thing from happening. The way to do that is to engineer out known hacks before they get exploited, not to laboriously rebuild after the exploit.
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:2)
Here, I'll explain it to you: yes, there might be an exploit someday, but if the past is any indication, I might be long dead and buried - and in Hell, you see, because I've been a very, very bad person. Though Hell is very hot at the moment, it might cool down when a Mac running OSX actually gets exploited because that may be a long time from now. Hence the jacket. Because jackets will warm you up when it's cold. It's not comf
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:2)
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:2)
So Apple should do what? Design their systems not to work with DHCP, even though it is virtually universal and often required for network compatibility? All security is a comprom
Re:Must be some new definition of "well-reasoned.. (Score:2)
They should design them to use DHCP, but they shouldn't ship with a default configuration where the DHCP server on your network can takeover root on the Mac.
There are well-known, accepted vulernabilities with DHCP: anyone on the LAN who responds to your address request can man-in-the-middle any data you send. Everyone (who cares about security) knows thi
DivX vs. Ogg Media (Score:4, Funny)
Re:DivX vs. Ogg Media (Score:2)
I'm well aware of that... I've made many of them myself, although I mainly stick with AVIs, since Ogm support is poor, and tools for working with ogg files just aren't available.
The container does, but since all the players that support Ogms are practially stone-aged, the benefits
WTF? (Score:2)
What was wrong with the daggit? Was this an attempt at humor, or did people genuinely hate that machine?
Re: Daggit Sucked? (Score:2)
I was 7 when BSG first came out, definately one of the viewers targeted by Boxey and the "stupid daggit". It definately was one of my least favorite things about the shows, hell I knew real dogs were faster, more agile, and in thier own way smarter than the robot dog. So whenever it got any screen
Re: Daggit Sucked? (Score:2)
You do realize that the reason he has that machine is because his real daggit (much like a dog from what I understand) died back at the home colony? From what I remember, they gave it to him so he wouldn't miss his dog so much, but they di
Re: Daggit Sucked? (Score:2)
What I wanted (and still want) more of in BSG:
- A prequelle that explains the origins of the cylons, how they got out of control, their motives for killing humans, etc.
- More episodes that show how cylons live, more insight into
Look at picture in link (Score:2)
Simillar experience with Mac security. (Score:3, Informative)
And no I'm no Mac zealot, although I use them quite a bit (I now work for the UNIX System Admin group and there are quite a few Xserves popping up around campus).
Re:Simillar experience with Mac security. (Score:2, Troll)
Berkeley and "real world" experience (Score:5, Interesting)
I was a sysadmin at Berkeley for 5 years.
I have the following observations: 1. The attitude of Windows users was less snobbish (i.e., they viewed their computer as a tool, not a fashion accessory),
2. There were less Macs, resulting in less assistance tickets for that platform, but the amount of time we spent dealing with each Mac issue was far greater than the amount of time. This was usually due to the fact that Apple had made some change, rendering recent hardware (~2 years) useless. (i.e. changes like dropping floppies, dropping SCSI, extremely poor hardware support with the launch of OS X, the OS 9/OS X dual boot requirement, shoddy DVD/USB support in OS X.0, etc)
3. We kept all machines patched, firewalled, and up-to-date with antiviral software, so viruses were not an issue.
Your Mileage May vary, of course.
Times have changed. (Score:3, Informative)
If anything, your first point is outdated. I have to deal with both Windows and Mac users on a regular basis, and if anything PC users are the ones with tweaked out (either software or hardware) computers, with 1001 different accessories making their computer less and less useful as a tool. Mac users on the other hand, usually have a co
Re:Berkeley and "real world" experience (Score:2)
So which Mac's are incompatible with SCSI? Or are you simply referring to the fact that Apple stopped including
SCSI on every single system, and started doing what Windows machines have always done--i.e. if you wanted SCSI, you needed to order a system with a SCSI card installed. As for floppies, I still have floppy drives on some of our recent M
Spare us the lecture (Score:3, Insightful)
First of all, DAD, that's not ironic. I guess English skills are suffering down in the NZ research department? Second, she did the moral thing while the rest of you stood around with an over-inflated parent complex. Even Polly admitted that Jon's trip was not any worse planned than hers, but that crap happens and you have to deal with it. It's not like he was asking for a free handout. Next time, save your lectures for your kids.
Re:Spare us the lecture (Score:4, Funny)
Oh yeah, I can imagine.
8 year old son: Dad, I'm hungry. I haven't eaten for three days.
"Dad": Well son, you should've been more prepared. See? Look, I have all this food because I came into this world prepared. You don't have any because you didn't bother to prepare. Lazy bum.
Re:Spare us the lecture (Score:2)
This guy was ill prepared he didn't even notify McMurdo that he was going to be attempting a polar overflight and that he would be using thier strip in an emergency. He didn't even call to McMurdo as he passed overhead on his way to the pole.
He may have thought he was prepared, but by the fact that the situation became what it was, he was decidedly unprepared.
I'm not saying he wasn't
Re:Spare us the lecture (Score:2)
First to fly.. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:First to fly.. (Score:2)
If you think flight = "Man bouncing around the air, followed by a horrable crash into the ground" then Richard William Pearse is your man.
If you think flight = "Man in a controlled flight followd by a gentle landing" than the Writes are your men.
Re:First to fly.. (Score:2)
im shocked (Score:2, Funny)
OS X is *more* secure than windows. period. (Score:4, Insightful)
emphasis on more. No computer system is ever secure in absolute terms.
while security surrounding DHCP has been and will continue to be a non-trivial issue, that one DHCP/directory issue that'd allow a malicious user on a LOCAL network to root a few boxes are still not the kind of vulnerabilities that'd allow worms to wreac wild havoc on the internet. In the case of this vulnerability, an exploit could spread to a local network and stop right there. There is just no way some worm could be written to spread outside of that local network. And worst, the exploit still needs to rely on the victim's machine actually DOING SOMETHING to be potentially vulnerable, in this case, rebooting, or renewing a DHCP lease, which are actions that seldom happen, especially on a network full of idling desktop boxes.
that exploit was interesting, needs to be addressed, requires more than a mere patch to a piece of C code and will require Apple and many Darwin/BSD developers to come-up with a complex solution that could involve user-interface updates or the development of certificates mechansisms which have been in discussion since 2001 in some rfc.
but this is hardly grounds for a windows user to gloat. and if the above didn't make sense, here are concepts that are simpler to understand:
Ever since OS X came out in its 10.1 version in late 2001, has any worm managed to spread thru OS X machines?
answer: no. Regardless of potential security holes found here and there, all OS X boxes ship by default with ALL NETWORK SERVICES TURNED OFF. Run nmap against a freshly installed OS X system, and guess what you get: NOTHING. NOT A SINGLE PORT OPENED. Hi there. Security 101 anyone? Even if OS X was the #1-used operating system in the world by millions and millions of people connected thru always-on broadband internet, any infection would stem from marginal power-users enabing certain remote services, at which point an infection or worm still wouldn't manage to reach the rest of the populace.
This is a far cry from windows boxes who have shipped for many years with services turned-on by default such as IIS and SMB, which allowed silly worms such as CodeRed and Nimda to make their initial way in, while further exploiting many exotic windoz system-level vulnerabilities surrounding Outlook and Internet Explorer, whereby previewing an e-mail or stumbling upon a malicious web page after pasting a URL found in an IRC chat room could get your computer thoroughly owned by inferior lifeforms also known as script kiddies, as your computer would secretly become one among thousands of unwitting drones awaiting their commands from a hidden IRC chatroom to launch DDoS attacks against some web sites, while seriously congesting the Internet. Hey Ulanoff, kinda sounds like what has happened at your office? thought so. Go Windoz.
Since System Mac 7.6 aka harmony with Open Transport which actually made internet access via dial-up and DHCP actually practical and easy-to-use circa 1996, has any internet-connected mac user running the default operating system as it was first installed from the Apple CDs ever gotten infected by a worm from just sitting on an un-NAT'ed, unfirewalled internet connection?
NO. That's because prior to OS X, Apple stuck to doing what they were good at: building an out-of-the-box single user, narrowly focused operating system targetted at your average joe-user and graphic designer, that had the ability to be extended thru 3rd-party software or other system configuration to better interoperate within, say, a corporate network. "Dave Client" comes to mind.
On the other hand Microsoft thought it would be fun to create worthless pieces of ass-ware such as windoz 95, NT, 98, ME, 2000 which they'd sell to BOTH enterprises and average joe-users, and enable, out-of-the-box, by default, a slew of services and features most users would never ever need or use, just so regardless of who the customer was, the operating syste
On video quality (Score:4, Interesting)
I downloaded the DivX version of Intel Extreme Edition Challenge to see how the quality compared to the WMV version. However, the conclusions that I've drawn come from the encoding process itself, and really don't concern the particular codec choices themselves. (I should note that Ben Waggoner voiced the same concerns [slashdot.org] when Modern Day Gamer 2 was released.)
The video could have been compressed a lot smaller (and quite possibly with an increase in quality, to boot), if it had been deinterlaced first--after all, PC monitors are progressive scan--and resized to something smaller and in the proper aspect ratio, like 640x480, instead of leaving it in native PAL resolution as it was here. Also, using non-square pixels requires user intervention to correct during viewing, unless the video was encoded with the pixel aspect ratio stored in the file, which is possible--but not used in this case--for WMV, but not AVI.
Just the small changes of not having to deal with all the little lines created by interlacing, and also having fewer pixels in general to encode would result in a lighter download and less artifacted video for all.
These films have all been great, content-wise, even for a non-team-oriented gamer such as myself, but once in a while, I can't help but wonder what would have been possible at the same download size with just a little bit of filtering and resizing.
Battlestar Galactica 2003 Series? (Score:3, Funny)
And, since the series will be on the SCI-FI channel, might as well note that the series is canceled (just as soon as you decide you like it) while you're at it.
OS X DHCP Exploit... (Score:2)
Makes sense to me.
The problem comes from the fact that this is open by default, and left open (so that while I do not use DHCP configured LDAP on my Mac, it is still open to that attack anytime I rebooted).
It seems like there is an easy solution - An
Re:Isn't it ironic?? (Score:2)
Re:Saddam? (Score:2)
I still don't give a rat's ass about the opinion of an organization guilty of coverying up numerous cases of child molestation.
I bet I get moderated down for this.
Re:Saddam? (Score:3, Informative)