×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

How Do You Get on the Discovery Channel?

Cliff posted more than 10 years ago | from the breaking-into-broadcasting dept.

Media 62

Anonym1ty asks: "My group of Amateur Radio Operators is planning a DX-Pedition in 2005 to an Island in Alaska. We are planning on operating a station for a few days to become the rare ham radio contact from the island. We already have sponsors, but we want to showcase this event and Ham Radio in some way to the public and were hoping to find some way to get PBS, The Discovery Channel or some other network to tag along with us and showcase what Amateur Radio is. In researching how to contact these I find a sea of red tape. The Discovery Channel Networks only take suggestions from scientists or production crews. PBS seems interested but the few stations I have actually received a response from seem to just mention how they have no budget. How do I find a production company and convince them this would be a good idea? It is important to note that we Ham Radio operators cannot make any money on this and any pecuniary gain would go to the production company."

cancel ×
This is a preview of your comment

No Comment Title Entered

Anonymous Coward 1 minute ago

No Comment Entered

62 comments

No thanks (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#8525989)

I work for Discovery and your idea sounds dumb - We're not interested. Thanks for asking though.

Give it up (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#8525990)

I mean, give up ham radio, and buy a cell phone like everyone else.

How can you not have a production crew? (0)

Toxygen (738180) | more than 10 years ago | (#8525994)

Isn't that kind of mandatory for operating a radio station?

You probably wont... (-1, Troll)

Creepy Crawler (680178) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526015)

PBS is in the continual state of no money. Discover is usually focused on new happenings and innovations.

Past that, do it for yourselves. Nobody much cares for Ham radio anymore. Sad, I know...

I'd say FP...

Easy, DIY (5, Insightful)

HuggybearVT (576997) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526059)

Just film it yourself. Buy a digital video camera, get lots of footage, and edit a demo tape. If it's really that interesting, National Geographic, PBS, Discovery, or someone might buy it. They would likely reedit your footage with voiceovers, etc., but expecting them to foot the bill of sending a crew, etc. is a longshot.

You mentioned that Discovery is only interested in talking to Producers... there you go. Become a producer.

Re:Easy, DIY (4, Insightful)

91degrees (207121) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526211)

I'd agree more or less, but would suggest finding someone with a little training to produce a good quality documentry. There have to be plenty of budding producers who would love to get some decent experience, and will have the training to know what makes a good documentry.

Re:Easy, DIY (1)

ReidMaynard (161608) | more than 10 years ago | (#8587510)

I'll take this a step further [as an avid viewer of these television channels]. As the British say, you need to "sex it up a bit".

I suggest adding a tan, leggy co-ed to your cast.

Easier still. (2, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#8526470)

Look into leasing DV cams, or institutions that might even loan them out for projects such as this, or even local sponsors such as a Good Guys or what not who have already restocked product to lend.

Put an ad in local art school newspapers and contact them about the opportunity you're offering, and how far you're willing to go. (No money, but free transportation and boarding.) Even your local TV station might help you out possibly by loaning equipment, possibly with interns, or someone else who gets the shit jobs.

Re:Easy, DIY (1)

corian (34925) | more than 10 years ago | (#8529531)

Just film it yourself. Buy a digital video camera, get lots of footage, and edit a demo tape.

And watch out for ghosted signals. This is, after all, the Ham (sandwich) Project.

Re:Easy, DIY (3, Informative)

pherris (314792) | more than 10 years ago | (#8530623)

As someone that use to make a living shooting video (all news) I'm both in agreement and little bugged by the parent posting. While HuggybearVT brings up a very good overall point but there are a few details missing.

Just film it yourself. Buy a digital video camera, get lots of footage, and edit a demo tape.

While high quality, easy use, low cost gear has allowed many more people to shoot video (a very good thing) the quality has really sufferred. If you really want to shoot someone for resale then I'd suggest:

Practice with your gear. Shoot, shoot and shoot. Unless you have at least a few hundred hours shooting usable footage your stuff will look like typical amateur crap.

Hang out with other shooters. Talk to them and look at their stuff. There are just some tricks that only experience will teach you.

Watch well shot ENG/EFP video. Check out CBS Sunday Morning. While the quality has dropped over the years it's still one of the best shot weekly news shows. There's a lot of good stuff on PBS but editing can hide a lot of mistakes. ENG work allows you see what can be done when time is everything.

Find an experienced producer you can trust. Interest in radio and the project first, experience second. Only work with those that have actually sold a completed project to a broadcast outlet (if that's your final goal).

Shoot a dry run. Try to locally simulate the trip and head out for a few days. This will help you work out many issues like charging batteries, lighting, what you really need and what you really don't need.

Get a Mac. Hey, I'm writing this from my gentoo box but macs IMO are the way to fly for cheap video production. A bottom of the line eMac works great. iMoive will allow to you to easily put together a demo to be shopped around.

Seek alternative distribution channels. Most likely you're stuff will never see any large scale public broadcast. If you want others to see what you've done then get creative. Think about licensing the project under the GNU FDL and let others move it around. Honestly, your chances of getting this on Discovery of very, very, very slim. Forget PBS, 'cause that will never happen.

Did I forget anything? Yup, about 99% of what it takes to pull this production off.

It's very possible that you might shoot it and take years to getting around to editting so don't try to stay on a strict production schedule. Don't get pushy about getting people to do anything on cue. The goal in this case is to be invisible. Luckly the cost is pretty minimal, maybe under $10k USD for an usable prosumer camera, eMac, batteries, et al.

Should you shoot it? Sure, why not. Will it ever make broadcast? Most likely not but you will learn a lot. A few productions under the belt will make all difference. Do it because you want to tell a story and you want to shoot it. The chances of it making dollar one are extremely slim.

If the goal is to save a few dollars by shooting and editting the project yourself for the main purpose of broadcast resale then you're SOL. You'll end up with something that looks like a local ad insert on some cable channel or "local access". Shoot it because it's a story you really want to tell.

Re:Easy, DILM (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#8535532)

Do it like mammals.

Sorry, somebody had to say it.

Don't forget the lighting (1)

bill_mcgonigle (4333) | more than 10 years ago | (#8539265)

The best digicam won't make up for poor lighting. Most of the stuff you see on TV that's not shot outdoors has lots of lighting, and I've even seen some outside crews use fill lighting outdoors.

How do I get on CNN? (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#8526110)

We are a small group of successful Slashdot trolls, getting frequent first posts, goatse links and blank messages embedded notwithstanding the lameness filter. We are in the process of organizing Troll Tuesday, where Slashdot will be inundated with frequent Natalie Portman, Stephen King dead and Beowulf cluster posts.

I am thinking of getting CNN Headline News to do a live coverage of this, but so far the damn liberal media in Atlanta has been hanging up on me. Had anyone had any success? Trolls don't make any money off this, the only money would be made by CNN selling ads to such an intense event broadcast.

Best way to get on Discovery (1)

El (94934) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526119)

Just convince Paul Teutul Sr. and Paul Teutul Jr. to go with you... maybe bring some of their choppers to ride around the island? No speed limits could be a major attraction. Of course, the fact that racing slicks don't work too well on tundra could be a major downside.

How about Discovery Canada? (3, Informative)

Curtman (556920) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526199)

Have you tried contacting the Canadian version of Discovery [discovery.ca] ? This kind of Technology in the Arctic story is right up their alley.

Re:How about Discovery Canada? (1)

mahonri5 (708013) | more than 10 years ago | (#8527189)

Depends on how broadly they define 'arctic'.
Fox island is in the South Central region of the state, near Seward. Now if they go during winter it could be close to arctic, but the area in general (ignoring microclimes, etc) will probably range in the 10s most of winter, and if I remember boating out there correctly, 55-70 in the summer.
Not too cold (well, I think so, but then again I'm from the area) and lacking in the proper 'arctic' motif. Too many of those darn spruce trees.

Re:How about Discovery Canada? (1)

Curtman (556920) | more than 10 years ago | (#8527507)

True, but I think it fits in very closely with one of our big problems in Canada, that is how to bring modern communications to remote northern communities. Anything of that nature will probably be very interesting to a lot of us. Heck why not take the whole thing up to Ellesmere Island [wikipedia.org] and apply for funding from the Canadian government. ;)

you want publicity? You got it... (3, Insightful)

bscott (460706) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526214)

I daresay you'll reach more hams via Slashdot than through any TV show. Are you just trying to draw attention to your endeavor, or are you hoping to attract more interest to amateur radio in general and perhaps recruit new fans? (call the show "Elmer Live"...) I'd hope any nascent genuine geeks won't be wasting time watching the mostly-drek on the Discovery Channel (Mythbusters notwithstanding) - figure out what the kids watch, and show 'em what's cool about ham radio if you can.

(KB0UQY - got the licence 8 years ago now, and have never so much as touched a radio since...)

Re:you want publicity? You got it... (1)

DerekLyons (302214) | more than 10 years ago | (#8527500)

I'd hope any nascent genuine geeks won't be wasting time watching the mostly-drek on the Discovery Channel (Mythbusters notwithstanding)
Bleh. Mythbusters is the worst of the drek. At least the rest of the drek doesn't palm itself off as being 'professional' and 'scientific'.

OT: Mythbusters (1)

bscott (460706) | more than 10 years ago | (#8539901)

Well, it's "edutainment" maybe, but they at least make passing references to objectivity and the scientific method. It combines elements of Junkyard Wars (pre shark-jumping) with Snopes and - uh, what other TV shows actually demonstrate processes like testing your assumptions and trying to prove the opposite of your theory?

My wife and I both like it, and we're such different people that apart from top-shelf comedies, almost nothing else on the air qualifies. I'll watch until it, too, goes downhill.

Re:OT: Mythbusters (1)

DerekLyons (302214) | more than 10 years ago | (#8540538)

Well, it's "edutainment" maybe, but they at least make passing references to objectivity and the scientific method.
They make passing references to it, and pay lip service to it, but they don't *practice* it. (For example, during the goldfish training episode they leave you with the impression that goldfish were trained to swim towards food, rather than the truth which is that they were trained to swim towards orange. A scientific test would have been to replace the orange 'rings' with black, and then with clear.)
uh, what other TV shows actually demonstrate processes like testing your assumptions and trying to prove the opposite of your theory?
Again, they don't demonstrate it as much as they mention it in passing and pay lip service to it. Usually they try to prove their theory, when it fails, or when it works, then they go blow stuff up. (For example, the suction from sinking ships episode; They demonstrate the suction with box. Then when they fail to find the suction with the sinking tug, they declare the myth 'busted', and utterly fail to adress the issue of *scale*. The forces from the tug were too small to effect their bodies, but that says little about the effects of a much larger vessel.)

Re:OT: Mythbusters (1)

bscott (460706) | more than 10 years ago | (#8552246)

> they don't demonstrate it as much as they mention it in passing
> and pay lip service to it. Usually they try to prove their theory,
> when it fails, or when it works, then they go blow stuff up.

And - your problem IS...?!

For television, particularly the Discovery Channel, they're a step forward.

Re:you want publicity? You got it... (1)

RevAaron (125240) | more than 10 years ago | (#8527769)

Hrmm. I don't think /. has that many hams. Most hams are older dudes these days, it is pretty rare for younger geeks to be into ham radio.

Maybe if this story was posted to 1950s slashdot you'd be reaching more hams...

Re:you want publicity? You got it... (1)

technos (73414) | more than 10 years ago | (#8530509)

Considering that the closest thing to a Slashdot of the 50's and 60's that a geek would have is the letter column of QST magazine, I should say so. :)

You can make money on this (2, Interesting)

orthogonal (588627) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526260)

It is important to note that we Ham Radio operators cannot make any money on this and any pecuniary gain would go to the production company.

Sure you can, see Sec. 97.113 (5)(c)
A control operator may accept compensation as an incident of a teaching position during periods of time when an amateur station is used

by that teacher as a part of classroom instruction at an educational
institution.


Just make it a long-distance learning "teachable moment".

Re:You can make money on this (1)

GigsVT (208848) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526636)

The artic is hardly an educational institution.

In any case, the rules don't say you can't make money from ham radio, tons of people do. What they do say is that you can't transmit communications for hire, including under the direction of an employer, and you can't transmit communications that you make money from.

Since they wouldn't be accepting money for transmitting, I don't think it would be breaking the rules. The rules are mainly intended to prevent commercial use of ham radio, i.e. using it instead of a commercial band for your company's walkie talkies, or taking payment to relay a message for someone, like a telegram service.

They wouldn't be using ham radio in a commercial way, the ham radio use is just incidental to them getting money, all their transmissions would be of a non-commercial nature.

An example: Hamfests often set up frequencies to use for talk-in during the hamfest. The use of the ham bands is incidental to the commercial activity.

Anyway, if you have any doubt, contact Riley Hollingsworth, K4ZDH. He'll definitely be able to tell you, as the FCC enforcement guy, and ham himself.

Re:You can make money on this (1)

cybpunks3 (612218) | more than 10 years ago | (#8529259)

"The artic is hardly an educational institution."

How would you know? You can't even spell ARCTIC.

Find a producer (3, Insightful)

Rick the Red (307103) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526268)

The Discovery Channel only talks to producers? Then find one. A producer brings you access to the talent and equipment needed, but they need money, too. You say you have sponsors, so pretend they'll sponsor the video and go talk to producers.

Meanwhile, pretend you have a producer and go talk to sponsors. Whose sleeping bags are you using? Whose trucks are you using? There must be some equipment you're using that isn't sponsored -- ask those folks to pay for the video crew. Whose radios are you using? Your own? Great -- find a radio manufacturer and ask them to sponsor the video, leave your radios at home and use theirs. I'd say the radio makers have the most to gain from popularizing ham radio.

Have you talked to the ARRL about this?

Read the credits (1)

jayrtfm (148260) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526275)

The credits of aired shows gives you a nice list of production companies and people you can contact.
Might also help to look into finding corporate/foundation sponsership for the show.

What is the story? (2, Informative)

cpuffer_hammer (31542) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526297)

The suggestions about filming yourself are interesting, if nothing else you will have something you can use yourselves as a promotional tool. I have help helped run small activities like this for the my local SCA group. The big thing is to have a story or narrative.

Set out your goals, getting to the site, setting up, whom do you expect to communicant with. What are the risks? What are the rewards? There needs to be tension. Set your goals high so that there is some risk of failure. If there is no risk there is no story. (I am not talking uncontrolled stupid risks.)

I would watch many "Junk Yard Wars" episodes to look at how they build a narrative around what would be otherwise boring. In some respects you are doing the same thing.

Then do it. Film it. Keep notes, like temperature and wind. Gets lots of comments and background on the people.

Then from all the film and tape build the documentary. You can even build more than one for different audiences. A outdoors story with radio, a radio story in the outdoors, a technical story, and so on. Finally test the documentaries and edit till you get good results.

Consider contacting a local collage to see if they have film or media students that need a subject to cover. The SCA documentaries I have helped with were filmed by students from a collage media program.

Charles Puffer

put together a good crew (3, Interesting)

cybercyph (221022) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526333)

Heres a thought. I'm a film student, and, as such, I know plenty of other talented, reliable guys and gals with a love for film and documentary. Many of us have our own equipment. All of us our broke.

Heres what i suggest: get some funding together. Get enough to pay airfare and lodging, and pizza for a crew of two. Post an ad on craigslist.org in the Los Angeles area, seeking an editor, sound guy, and DV cinematographer.

How long will you be up there? i imagine a fairly interesting 60-90 minute documentary could be shot in a week, and edited in a couple months. Bring the sound-guy and cinematographer (with their own equipment) along (make sure you ask to see a reel, and at the very least interview the kids over the phone. make sure you like their personalities, as well their work.

Enter the final product in some film festivals (credit yourself as Producer and Director). with any luck, you'll get some screening, and perhaps a straight to dvd deal or some theatrical release.

if you're interested and want to discuss this further, i'd be happy to give you some ideas over email:
taylorfinley@hotmail.com

Re:put together a good crew (2, Informative)

stevew (4845) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526505)

Having been on a few DXpeditions myself (to places you can take airplanes too) I need to comment that where these guys are planning on going I imagine there isn't going to be Pizza, running water, or maybe even standing buildings!

Think tents, some generators, and antennas on at a barren location.

What I WOULD suggest to the parties involved is to look into tieing into some naturalist activities. This way you can have a double edged story AND increase your possible audience at the same time.

There was exactly just such a production a few years ago, I believe the expedition went to Hurd Island (maybe some other place in Antartica...) They had a group of naturalists, mountain climbers and amateur radio folks that were each there for their own reasons. Made a pretty reasonable show - and was aired on PBS originally.

Do something along these lines and you might find sponsorship from National Geographic?!?

Re:put together a good crew (1)

RobertB-DC (622190) | more than 10 years ago | (#8533687)

What I WOULD suggest to the parties involved is to look into tieing into some naturalist activities. This way you can have a double edged story AND increase your possible audience at the same time.

What, you're wanting to get it on the FOX network now?

Oh, sorry, I thought you said naturist activities [rr.com] . My bad.

I want to be on TV too... (3, Insightful)

fm6 (162816) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526364)

Alas, I never do anything interesting, so I guess that's not on the menu.

I find it strange that you're blaming the lack of interest on "red tape" and "funding". What you haven't told us is, What's your pitch? Why should anybody spend a lot of time and money to put you on TV? What's visually compelling about your event?

Yeah, there's a lot of boring stuff on TV, and you think your event would be an improvement. But not everybody shares your interests. If you want to be on TV, you have to sell yourself. And do it fast, 'cause there are a million or so people in line behind you.

It would only be of interest... (1)

d_p (63654) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526370)

...to the Discovery Channel if it were called "Monster HAM Radio" or if it was about about stangers remodeling your equipment.

Find a freelancer! (2, Informative)

omarius (52253) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526434)

I know very little about TV and filmmaking, but do have a friend who does freelance production. I've seen some of the work he's done on a "Insomnia"-like show which he hopes to sell to a network or cable channel.

So my suggestion is: find a freelancer who's willing and able to do a professional documentary, do it, and THEN hawk it to whomever you please. Depending on how well "sold" your idea is to this potential producer you might have to help finance the work, but it sounds like you believe in your idea; if he or she does, too, perhaps they'd even do it just for a share in the profits.

Good luck!

Talk to the BBC. (2, Insightful)

g_lightyear (695241) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526666)

Let's face it. The beeb is the world's last, best hope for decent documentaries of this nature.

I work in the Film Biz (4, Informative)

microcars (708223) | more than 10 years ago | (#8526676)

but that does not mean I can produce your project :~/

heed the suggestions to either find a Production Company or Make this Yourself under the banner of a Production Company you create just for this.

The Discovery Channel only buys programming. They may enter into an agreement to co-sponsor something with a Production Company that has a track record with them, but you have nothing right now.

One of the best suggestions so far is to do the NPR thing, its really cheap (sound only) and you can possibly use this as leverage to get a Video Production Company onboard to do the filming.

However- the bad thing about being your own Production Company is that you have to find all the funding yourself and if you decide you can just make the Video yourself and you have no experience, you may end up with just an expensive home movie.
Your project will have to fit into a pre-determined format and time frame (under 60 minutes, probably under 30 and in reality, it may just end up being a 5 minute bit as part of a newsmagazine show.....).

I don't have any recommendations for Production Companies to go to though, watch the credits carefully on some shows and look for name of the Production Company who actually produced the piece. You will find the same ones listed again and again.

Re:I work in the Film Biz (1)

cmoss (14324) | more than 10 years ago | (#8527505)

Actually they also have developed their own programs and sponsored some events. They arranged the location and recovery of the liberty bell space capsule. They followed the search with updates (and chats, i think) on their website.

Maybe the original submitter should try to reach the discovery online people. See if they will follow you around and document it on their website. They could produce a film of the event afterwards.

Chuck

Start at the Ground and Move Up (2, Interesting)

MikeDawg (721537) | more than 10 years ago | (#8527168)

Before you start trying to get attention from the Discovery channel, why don't you talk to local news stations? Local TV stations in general are pretty good about touching on the subject if nothing else, and will get the message of what you are doing out into the public -- all of this a good thing, considering you'll probably find more hams to participate in this activity.

My suggestions:

  • Come up with an amateur press release and mail it to several media outlets
  • Contact a local newstations and local newspapers
  • Mail your press releases, and related local media coverage (attention that you got from the mailings and talks to radio, TV, and newspapers) to larger outlets, up to and including Reuters, AP, Discovery Channel, PBS, etc.

Just my suggestion -- Start Small, and Build.

Contact an independent production company (1)

DaveJay (133437) | more than 10 years ago | (#8527204)

If you can convince them (and it isn't as hard as it sounds) that there's a story there, and that you'll let them present the event in any fashion they wish, someone'll tag along with you then sell the resulting piece somewhere (or at least show it at film festivals).

Of course, there's always the danger of becoming the Monster Garage or Blair Witch Project of Amateur Radio, so be wary about WHO you choose. Since you're not looking to make any money whatsoever, you can be picky about whom you trust to treat the subject matter with respect. Just don't get in the way on the day-to-day stuff.

Ah, the failure of television... (0, Flamebait)

bersl2 (689221) | more than 10 years ago | (#8527261)

The content is controlled oligarchically and plutocratically. Local access is a complete joke, public television is underfunded, and the rest of it has such prohibitively high costs.

Easy, make it more interesting (2, Funny)

bigsteve@dstc (140392) | more than 10 years ago | (#8527599)

How about ... "Amateur Radio at the North Pole!",
or ... "Amateur Radio in the Arctic Circle without any clothes on!",
or ... "Polar Bears on the Amateur Radio".

The last could be interesting. Imagine the footage you could get with an unarmed Ham operator teaching a hungry polar bear to key in morse code.

(Sorry ... no offense intended!)

Paying for airtime on PBS (4, Informative)

Phronesis (175966) | more than 10 years ago | (#8528144)

I don't know about commercial networks, but the biggest hurdle in getting something on PBS is not getting editorial interest, but raising the money to pay for the air time. It is very expensive to get a documentary aired on PBS and the money comes from the film production company, not from PBS's operating budget.

My uncle and aunt have a film production company that has made several documentaries that have aired on PBS and they tell me that the cost of airtime is a lot more than the cost of producing the movies.

The best way to get something on air on PBS is to find a way to raise money for the production and the air time. Ken Burns's approach to this, from what I hear, is that he's a wizard at getting large corporations to sign on to sponsor the production and air time.

You might go after some RF engineering companies to see if their charitable giving or public relations divisions would be interested in sponsoring a short broadcast documentary.

Re:Paying for airtime on PBS (1)

fm6 (162816) | more than 10 years ago | (#8532395)

Ken Burns's approach to this, from what I hear, is that he's a wizard at getting large corporations to sign on to sponsor the production and air time.
He probably just plays that damned violin, and they give him the money so he'll stop!

Re:Paying for airtime on PBS (1)

fm6 (162816) | more than 10 years ago | (#8532553)

My uncle and aunt have a film production company that has made several documentaries that have aired on PBS and they tell me that the cost of airtime is a lot more than the cost of producing the movies.
So why do they go through PBS? Member stations aren't required to take all their programming from the network, and satellite syndication isn't that expensive.

Re:Paying for airtime on PBS (1)

Phronesis (175966) | more than 10 years ago | (#8533051)

If you can raise the money to go through the network, you get a lot more exposure and recognition (competition for prizes, etc.). If your piece is aired on the network, it's more competitive for Emmys etc. and if you have marketing tie-ins, like coffee-table books, you can tie into the PBS marketing machine.

For something like the question at hand, your suggestion of going through the local public stations instead of the network is excellent.

It's easy... (1)

azuroff (318072) | more than 10 years ago | (#8529269)

Have lots of alligators around, and talk in a funny accent.

Bonus points for letting your toddler play with the alligators.

TLC (2, Funny)

corian (34925) | more than 10 years ago | (#8529516)

If you can somehow present your radio trip as a home-remodeling extravaganza, The Learning Channel might be willing to send over a crew.

(Anyone else remember when their output actually involved "learning?" Must have been sometime back when MTV actually showed "music".)

Redecorate! (1)

aduzik (705453) | more than 10 years ago | (#8529564)

Discovery will never put on a show about setting up a HAM radio station anywhere. BUT, if you build and subseqeuntly redecorate said station, they'll be all over you faster than you can say "Paige Davis"

Nova (1)

Dachannien (617929) | more than 10 years ago | (#8529746)

You might try contacting WGBH Boston about producing an episode of Nova that centers on ham radio. Most public TV stations don't have a lot in the way of funding, but WGBH seems to manage to put together some really nice shows. (Heck, John Lithgow narrates about half of them.)

Re:Nova (1)

Anonym1ty (534715) | more than 10 years ago | (#8532520)

I have tried to contact them three times, each time I have received no response... But I am not giving up, I am continuing to contact them.

Re:Nova (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#8540384)

PBS's best narrator is Will Lyman, who narrates most Frontline episodes, some Nova, and lots of other things.

Lyman rules.

Make it interesting. (1)

FreeLinux (555387) | more than 10 years ago | (#8531389)

You'd like to be on TV while you do a project that interests you. Doesn't everyone? But, the question is; is your project of interest to millions of people? Bare in mind that most people do not share your interest in ham radio, including myself.

You must ask yourself a few questions about the project. What about your event is going to draw the attention of millions of people? Is it really cool? It might be cold, being in Alaska but, not really "cool". Is it exciting? Is there life threatening danger or death defying stunts? Lots of high-speed action? Morbidity? Scantily clad chicks? Or is it a bunch of guys bundled up in parkas and huddled in front of radios cheering and high fiving because they were able to say, "I read you, five by five." to someone a couple of thousand miles away?

I suspect that the latter is likely the case and while it is very exciting for the participants of the event, spectators will be sleeping faster than thay would with a Nova episode about string theory. Steve Irwin might not interest you but, he interests a very large number of people for many different reasons. People tune in to watch because they are drawn to the "death defying stunts" of playing with poisonous snakes or "man eating" crocodiles. Some will watch because they don't want to miss when he finally gets bitten and they get their chance to say, "I knew that idiot was going to get it". Still others watch because they are interested in those animals or have never seen those animals for themselves.

The point is that while Steve Irwin may be of interest to millions of people for various reasons. A Ham operators club doing their thing on an island in Alaska just doesn't do it for most people. Sorry.

film departments (2, Informative)

cryptozoologist (88536) | more than 10 years ago | (#8531827)

contact university film departments around the country. their students are always looking for projects. here is a link for my alma mater.
http://www.wright.edu/academics/theatre/pr ograms/m otion_pictures1.html

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...