Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

TiVo vs. Windows Media Center Edition

timothy posted more than 10 years ago | from the compare-contrast dept.

Television 335

The Importance of writes "Two reviewers make head-to-head comparisons of TiVo and Windows Media Center Edition (here and here). TiVo still comes out ahead, but MCE is improving. Of course, some tout the flexibility of PC-based DVRs, while others question what this flexibility means when you have things like the broadcast flag and the INDUCE Act."

cancel ×


Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

fp (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633432)


Personally (2, Interesting)

clester (744726) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633449)

Not to troll in any way, but personally, I will always support Tivo in the Tivo vs. MCE case for the soul reason of giving M$ my business... Just my .02

Re:Personally (3, Insightful)

Enigma_Man (756516) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633458)

Even if eventually MCE became the better product? (god of technology forbid)


Re:Personally (4, Interesting)

darth_MALL (657218) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633521)

"Even if eventually MCE became the better product? (god of technology forbid)"
Wouldn't it be a good thing to see MS bring out a product worth supporting? It's an awful lot of energy wasted trying to dislike something. Maybe they could earn the #1 spot for a change.

Re:Personally (1, Offtopic)

SIGALRM (784769) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633606)

It's an awful lot of energy wasted trying to dislike something

Shady business tactics aside, Microsoft does produce some excellent server management tools, and great productivity software. I've learned that although I'm a huge F/OSS fan, it's hard to beat Visio.

Sometimes, they win because they deserved to. And if MCE eventually falls into that category, I might just buy it...

Re:Personally (3, Insightful)

I_Love_Pocky! (751171) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633717)

You realize that they bought Visio right? I mean that last few versions have been put out by Microsoft, but I haven't seen that many enhancements.

Re:Personally (1, Offtopic)

RobotRunAmok (595286) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633776)

it's hard to beat Visio.

Which is undoubtedly why MS bought Visio Corp., the guys who created it, circa mid-late '90s.

But I agree with you. MS makes some great products, and it's juvenile to overlook them simply beacuse "M$ is Evil, d00D!!!" Frankly, if for nothing else, MS should be given props for inventing the stuff (Office suite integration, e.g.) that the other guys inevitably come along and re-create less expensively, more securely, whatever.

Re:Personally (5, Interesting)

bje2 (533276) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633483)

that's exactly what i was thinking...don't let your anti-MS stance blind you to what they're doing...what if MS stumbles upon a cure for just gonna ignore it, because MS discovered it???

Re:Personally (2, Insightful)

arieswind (789699) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633551)

No, but if someone discovers a cure for cancer, and Microsoft decides to make their own version of the cure because they want to make a few bucks, unless it was overwhelmingly better, I wouldn't bother.. especially if the old drug was as well known as tivo is... tivo is almost synonimus with digital tv recording/playback/etc

Re:Personally (2, Insightful)

Saeed al-Sahaf (665390) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633610)

No, but if someone discovers a cure for cancer, and Microsoft decides to make their own version...

If you had cancer, you would not care WHO had the cure. Been there, done that.

Re:Personally (2, Insightful)

JVert (578547) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633711)

I will always support Tivo in the Tivo vs. MCE case for the soul reason of giving M$ my business...
Q.Tivo does not let you take your shows with you on your laptop. The cure for cancer is nice but can I please take the cure with me on the road?

I.A."Not interested in your microsoft lifestyle."

(I.A. ignorant answer)

Re:Personally (5, Funny)

Kenja (541830) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633584)

"what if MS stumbles upon a cure for just gonna ignore it, because MS discovered it?"

We dont need no DRM enabled cancer cure. The GPLed treatment is almost as good. Granted you need to swap out about half of your body parts to be compatible with it.

Re:Personally (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633714)

what if MS stumbles upon a cure for just gonna ignore it, because MS discovered it???

If Microsoft stumbles upon a cure for cancer, I will personally devote each anniversary of that day to running through the city streets, screaming "God, NO!!! BJE2 WAS RIGHT!!! NOOOO!!!", wearing nothing but shaving cream, chocolate frosting, and the shattered remains of my dignity.


eh! tú! sí, tú... (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633452)

comeme el porro.

coto matamoros

Buy TIVO!!! (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633454)

Buy TIVO!! Help it's stock go up!

Guess what... (5, Insightful)

Last_Available_Usern (756093) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633456)

Hey...guess what I've never had to reboot so Tivo. I don't intend for that to change anytime soon either.

Re:Guess what... (2, Informative)

Overzeetop (214511) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633722)

Interesting. I've had two TiVos, and both required occasioanl rebooting. The first required it every two weeks to two months, the second has had to be rebooted three times in the year I've owned it. Giving the simplicity of the software running and total control over the OS and software, I don't think that's any better than having to reboot my XP workstation every three weeks to a month.

Sorry (4, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633459)

But anyone who picks a PC based solution is someone with too much time on their hands, and needs to examine their lifestyle, perhaps.

Computers are a hobby of mine, and *I* don't have the time or patience to set something like this up. $149 for a Tivo gave me dual tuners, snappy interface and recording of the original DirecTV data stream (no quality loss). $6 a month? If $6 a month is even an issue to you, again, take a magnifying lens to your life. Something isn't working correctly.

Re:Sorry (4, Insightful)

timts (766509) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633511)

a tv tuner card on pc can do much better than tivo, not to mention you have the ability to burn them on CDR, or burn them to DVDR, even DVD( on DVDR) and archive them. :D

Re:Sorry (1)

BeerMilkshake (699747) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633546)

Correct me if I am wrong, but I think that you can buy/use a TiVo without subscribing to the online directory service.

So, even if the $6 -is- a big deal, you can opt out and still use the TiVo.

Re:Sorry (2, Informative)

redtape (37014) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633781)

Only the ones with a DVD player/recorder, which have TiVo basic service, or really early Series 1s that could be used like a VCR. The remaining Series 2s and DirecTV units require some sort of service agreement (Lifetime, or month to month with Standalones, $5? fee with DirecTV).
Monthy is $12.95 for first Standalone, and $6.95 for the next 5 in a household.
I have Lifetime on my 1 standalone.

Re:Sorry (1)

kannibal_klown (531544) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633588)

I think a standalone media center is insane, and think a Tivo is a better solution for many reasons, most of which yuo stated. Heck, I'd even be OK with the lifetime subsription. While it would cost more, it would just make things easier, a "set it and forget it" type thing, where you don't have to worry about the incidental charges.

However, if you already have a PC, setting it up to record TV shows isn't that hard (and pretty cheap).

As I'm not into gaming so much lately, I bought a TV Tuner card and Snapstream. Now, my main desktop can record stuff for me, and I can burn it to DVD if I so desire. It took maybe 30 minutes and $120 for the software and hardware, and I can skip commercials, edit them out before archiving, burn them to CDs or DVDs, etc.

However, there's not way in hell I'd try to make a small PC to place in my entertainment center. It would be too costly and too time consuming. Not to mention the upkeep to make sure everything is running smoothly.

Re:Sorry (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633598)

Sorry, but you're wrong on the amount of time it takes for a user to set up a Media Center PC. You buy it with everything pre-installed and it just works. Send your audio and video out to the TV and connect the cable to your tuner card. Same steps as hooking up a Tivo. I'll grant you that it costs more for a PC with MCE (the PC can do a whole lot more of course), but it really doesn't take additional effort to set up.

Re:Sorry (1, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633603)

maybe that is someones hobby.

maybe you should take a magnifying lens to your life, and stop being critical of what others CHOOSE to do.

basically, go buy a tivo, but sit quiet when someone else actively chooses a different approach.

Re:Sorry (4, Insightful)

BillFarber (641417) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633619)

Computers are a hobby of yours, but you don't have the time or patience to install a video capture card and beyondTV from snapstream?

You might want to think about a new hobby if doing either of those strains your time or patience.

Please give me $6/month then. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633623)

You won't miss it- hell if 2% of the people here gave me 6$/month I could retire and make an encrypted anonymous p2p app that didn't suck like freenet does.

Re:Sorry (2, Insightful)

liquidsin (398151) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633633)

Point me to the manual for setting up the tivo to play mp3/ogg through my stereo, download and play video off the internet, burn audio cds, vcds, and dvds, and play roms for all my favourite arcade and nes games right on my tv. Otherwise stfu about your ideas on what I should be doing with my free time.

Re:Sorry (3, Interesting)

dumpsterKEEPER (787464) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633645)

I think you're overlooking differing points of view with these statements. First of all, computers are not a "hobby" of mine. I have always looked at them as being different than model railroading and stamp collecting because of the great rewards provided by being proficient at them. I work with computers for a living, and enjoy continuing to use them in my personal life as well.

One of my future goals is to set up a PC based solution for basic idea mentioned in this article. When I do, will use a PC based solution for several reasons. First, I consider it to be more flexible than the current mainstream offerings (although I'm always willing to keep my eye on them). Secondly, I thoroughly enjoy the process of setting up and configuring the system. Finally, when I complete the project, I will enjoy using it far more because it is something that I created myself and tuned to my exact specifications.

If computers really are just a hobby to you, then no, $6 a month is nothing at all. For me it would have nothing to do with the monthly cost but the satisfaction of creation. Yes, it also takes more time, but I'm sure you also choose to make time for things that you enjoy doing. Just because I select a route that involves more work but provides me with a great deal of personal enjoyment out of creating and using hardly means that "something isn't working correctly" with my life.

Re:Sorry (3, Interesting)

SilentChris (452960) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633648)

"If $6 a month is even an issue to you, again, take a magnifying lens to your life. Something isn't working correctly."

Maybe to you, but *understanding* it is worth far more than $6 a month to some people.

Re:Sorry (4, Insightful)

AuMatar (183847) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633649)

6 dollars a month for the rest of your life. Even if you need to buy all new hardware, thats a payback time of 1-2 years. At worst the time to do it will add another year to that. Plus you'll never need to buy a new pc. If you want the latest cool feature, just update the software. Thats a much better deal than a Tivo IMO. Besides, I hate being nickle and dimed by recurring payments. And I don't want to pay for a lifetime contract, what if Tivo goes out of business?

That stated- Microsoft would not be my software of choice. I'd go Myth TV or the like.

Re:Sorry (4, Insightful)

isorox (205688) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633720)

6 dollars a month for the rest of your life. Even if you need to buy all new hardware, thats a payback time of 1-2 years.

Wow, $144 for a new PVR-ready computer?

Dont get me wrong, a MythTV setup is much more expansive then tivo, but you can get Tivo and 5 years listings for the price.

Re:Sorry (5, Insightful)

spronk (712662) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633662)

Recording TV shows is just one small part of what an HTPC does. A Tivo can't even come close to what something like MythTV can do. People get so hung up on the PVR aspects of HTPCs that they miss the bigger picture.

Using a computer to replace a Tivo *is* rather silly. Using a computer to replace a CD player, DVD player, and Tivo plus provide Newsfeeds weather maps, video conferencing, create DVDs of your favorite shows and more not to mention provide that content to any room in your home isn't.

try $13/month (3, Informative)

apachetoolbox (456499) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633665)

Where did you get $6/month from?

Standard tivo fee is at least $12.99/month. That's high for just downloading tv listings and keeping track of everything I watch. It should be free for the privilege of tracking everything I do with it in my opinion.

Re:try $13/month (1)

Sc00ter (99550) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633727)

He has DirecTiVo, it's cheaper per month.

stupid 20 second rule.. damn slashdot.

Re:try $13/month (3, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633754)

He said that he got dual tuners, which means he's using a DirectTivo. Its a Direct TV box with Tivo built in. DirectTivo users only have to pay $6 a month for Tivo service. Been that way for awhile.

Tivo did just lower the price of a second regular Tivo box to six bucks a month though

Re:try $13/month (2, Informative)

bozzaj (682845) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633755)

I think he's speaking of the DirecTivo units, which are slightly different. They only work for DirecTV, but they can record two streams directly from the satellite without additional compression.

And the charge is $4.99/month for the service. Obviously, that's over and above the DirecTV service.

If you're looking at analog-only cable or regular TV, Tivo becomes a harder sell. Personally, since I have DirecTV, I find it much more convenient to have a DirecTivo box instead of a regular Tivo unit that has to change the channel on the satellite receiver to record, not to mention the fact that dual-streams is out in that situation.

Re:try $13/month (1)

thinksnow (748928) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633761)

DirecTivo is only $4.95-$6. Notice the OP mentioned Direct TV and being able to record two things at once? Yeah, that's a satellite thing only.

Re:Sorry (5, Insightful)

rs25com (710712) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633669)

Besides the hurdles involved, I think the WAF (Wife Acceptance Factor) plays a bigger part than we think about. I tried the TV on PC thing, and when it crashed in the middle of a show, or I had to use the computer and she wanted to watch something.... Yeah, I still use Tivo for TV and my PC for PC. ;)

Re:Sorry (2, Interesting)

spronk (712662) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633741)

My wife is the one who requested the removal of our Tivo after using our HTPC. Our boxes don't crash, they only get rebooted to update the kernel now and then but otherwise they're running 24/7 recording shows and what not.

Re:Sorry (1)

jo42 (227475) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633725)

First off: "Pfffht!!!"

I built meself an HTPC in an the Antec Overture case. Besides having 500GB of network storage, I've got an Satellite tuner card, HDTV Wonder soon, and ATI 9800 AIW card driving my 34" widescreen Sony WEGA at 1920x1080. Let's see a TiVO thinga-maboober do that sometime soon...

Re:Sorry (0, Offtopic)

jprior2001 (787374) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633733)

Honestly, who has this much time to watch TV? Get outside, do something a little more exciting.

Re:Sorry (1)

JVert (578547) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633737)

Frankly I dont have the time to wait for directivo menus to draw... Ugh soo slow, I have a media center and a tivo in the house. Jumping through commercials and navigating through recorded tv is sooo much faster on the mce then the tivo.

Re:Sorry (2, Insightful)

TechnoPops (590791) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633777)

Well, what about those of us whose lives are computers (even if those people are few and far between nowadays)? Those of us who really enjoy these things, work with them on a daily basis, and like to be constructive? For us, it's more than simply what you get--it's what you put IN. It's about that satisfaction you get from seeing tangible results from your efforts in the things you love. Anyone who's passionate about anything understands this, and that's why there are people who will spend the time, money, and effort to build their own box than buying the TiVo.

TiVo vs. MythTV (4, Interesting)

gmplague (412185) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633468)

I want to see a comparison of TiVo vs. MythTV vs. Freevo vs. Media Center. From my experience, MythTV should definitely come up on top. I've got a box running MythTV that acts as my tivo, fileserver, network audio device, and game console. Can tivo do all that?

Re:TiVo vs. MythTV (2, Informative)

CommanderData (782739) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633502)

I'd add MediaPortal [] to that list for comparison, although I would agree MythTV [] should come out on top, it's awesome!

Re:TiVo vs. MythTV (4, Interesting)

kannibal_klown (531544) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633518)

Throw "SnapStream" into there as well.

While not free, it's pretty cheap ($30 USD).

My main PC doubles as a DVR when I'm not using it. It's a breeze to setup (as simple as you could possibly get, actually), looks wonderful, and functions very well.

Granted, it requires some flavor of Windows (that can run .Net libraries), but it's still great. And they set it up that if the company ever goes under, you can point Snapstream to the same kind of data that Myth uses.

It's really a must-see-to-believe thing. I thought it was going to be some cheezy software, but it is really well put together.

However, I think a "Tivo" is a better solution. You don't have to sit there and configure stuff, update stuff, bla bla bla. It's relatively cheap (even with the lifetime subsription it's not that bad), and does everything you need (with the exception of burning the vids onto CD's or DVD's).

Don't forget ReplayTV...or have we already? (1)

IronChefMorimoto (691038) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633594)

You could include ReplayTV in that comparison as well, it even worth considering anymore? TiVO has become a part of the digital cable and DirecTV hardware offerings now. I don't remember seeing ReplayTV anywhere in the mix.

It's a shame too, since ReplayTV did some things better than the Series 2 TiVO. But -- at the same cost level (for the most part) as the TiVO, is/was it a bad investment? If it ever went completely under?

My 2 cents.


Re:TiVo vs. MythTV (1)

mjh (57755) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633688)

I think that depends on the feature set that's important to you. For me, perfect picture quality from my TV provider is really quite important. In which case the DirecTiVo is the clear winner. No F/OSS PVR can currently offer that. Hopefully, when CableCARD [] is implemented everywhere, that will change.

Re:TiVo vs. MythTV (1)

Tobias Luetke (707936) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633712)

Actually i switched from MythTV to media center edition. Mainly because of the amazing UI of MCE ( eye candy on a TV is what its all about ) and the really really bad picture quality of the NVIDIA x11 driver tv out. ( only one version could do overscan and this version was particularly unsharp )

I do miss a couple of features from Myth though, auto xviding of recorded shows rocked.

Re:TiVo vs. MythTV (1)

JVert (578547) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633782)

There are plugins for media center that convert the heavy dvrms into wm9.

Re:TiVo vs. MythTV (2, Insightful)

bandar8338 (791576) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633732)

I was considering moving to Linux (yes, I use Windows, no, I've never had a virus) and looked at MythTV to replace everything that comes with the ATI All-in-Wonder that I have, but when reading the documentation, found out it didn't work with my card (or any of the All in Wonders). I'm a college student with limited space, and I can't justify not using a $200 piece of hardware.

hackable tivos would be even more flexable. (5, Insightful)

ron_ivi (607351) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633476)

If only tivo embraced being hacked, they'd be even more flexable than a TV.

Personally I think hardware companies should encourage this practice. I picked my wireless router because if it's readily available

third party linux-firmware

If Tivo encouraged this practice, they'd have far more than media center very quickly.

Re:hackable tivos would be even more flexable. (4, Insightful)

foidulus (743482) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633507)

How large of the purchasing population actually wants to hack their stuff though?
If there is a sufficient business case then companies will go after the money, but I don't really think there is that much of a business case for hackable hardware...

Re:hackable tivos would be even more flexable. (5, Interesting)

nchip (28683) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633654)

Even if you don't want to hack them yourself, buying hackable hardware means you can probably install easily hacks done by others, which increases the value of the hardware a lot.

That's why I payed a little bit more on my phone (to get a symbian based one which allows you to install your own software instead of just java midlets), and a linksys Access Point.

Most people do not yet realize that the lifetime of hackable hardware is a lot longer than locked hardware.

Re:hackable tivos would be even more flexable. (3, Insightful)

konfoo (677366) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633544)

You've got it wrong. The point of selling a settopbox or dvr is not to sell the settopbox or dvr for profit from the hardware. In most cases that is already a loss since it may be subsidized. The point is to sell the services that go with it like PPV and channel subs. Thats what makes the profit back, and thats why letting you hack your box makes no sense.

Re:hackable tivos would be even more flexable. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633687)

how does one thing have to do with another.
tivo sells data, how the heck is someone gonna continually put together that kind of data.

Re:hackable tivos would be even more flexable. (5, Informative)

Monsieur Canard (766354) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633555)

Well they are hackable [] , just not fully supported by Tivo Inc.

Re:hackable tivos would be even more flexable. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633614)

document Last changed on Wed Jun 20 12:09:53 2001 I guess all that is hackable has been hacked on tivo.

OT? - letter to Direct TV (3, Interesting)

teamhasnoi (554944) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633480)

Here's a copy of my letter to Direct TV in regards to the Home Media Option

Subject: Home Media Option

Details: Where is it? This is something I would PAY for. You don't
even have a mention of it on your website, or an option for a DVR in
your 'Topics' above . At least you could be forthcoming about the
reasons you don't offer this service.

I have been a customer of yours for several years (I'm not putting my
customer number in on purpose) and have had DirectTV Tivo for a little
over 4 months.

I purchased this 'service' under the impression that I would be able to
network it, burn my shows to DVD, and stream shows to my PCs and Macs.

DirectTV has disappointed.

Your customer service is great, and I have very few service complaints,
but your refusal to work with your customers on this issue has me
investigating Dish Network and Replay TV and cable offerings in my area
- soon my DSL provider will be providing video on demand.

It is obvious to me that if DirectTV continues treating its customers
unfairly, the customers are going to leave for a provider that
understands fair use.

Thanks for your time.

(Reply follows)
Dear Customer,

Thank you for writing. As you know, the TiVo stand alone may offer the
Home Media Option, but DIRECTV DVR with TiVo does not. However, DIRECTV
DVR with TiVo may focus more on other features, such as video-based
services like Starz on Demand. For information about TiVo stand alone
units and service, please visit the website at: or you can
call 877-FOR-TIVO, that's 877-367-8486. Available 11AM-11PM ET daily.

Please know that we are always looking for ways to enhance our services.
Your suggestions are valuable and we use them to judge interest in
various programming sources. In fact, we have made changes as a result
of viewer feedback.

We have forwarded your comments to our programming department. Please
continue to visit our web site at for the latest news and
information about our services.

Additionally, as you know, DIRECTV makes changes and additions to our
programming line-up from time to time. However, it is a DIRECTV policy
not to discuss upcoming announcements until their official release date,
and at this time we have no official announcement beyond what we have
already communicated to the public. We invite you to visit the News
Releases section of our web site at s.js p for the latest

We hope that this information is helpful. Thanks again for writing.


DIRECTV Customer Service

Re:OT? - letter to Direct TV (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633524)

haha, a chain letter reply.

You don't matter, tiny consumer drone. Lone screwballs can affect nothing. Now go write a check to DirectTV, thats right.

Re:OT? - letter to Direct TV (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633550)

I vote with my wallet! Ah, who am I kidding...

Re:OT? - letter to Direct TV (1)

silas_moeckel (234313) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633593)

Yea DirecTV sucks as a corperation. I just wish somebody would come out with a comparable service, dont even mention Dish I had there DVR it's pitifull and there picture quality is worse than DirecTV. Forget any device based upon analog capture it's one thing if it's a one time cost but there is such a quality hit untill you get into expensive cards it's hard to justify. Cable's analog is hit or miss and there digital offerings in my area are worse than DirecTV. The best fit I have found is the HD DirecTV Tivo's.

Re:OT? - letter to Direct TV (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633636)

...Dish I had there DVR it's pitifull... Such a command of English!

Re:OT? - letter to Direct TV (2, Funny)

Mantorp (142371) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633767)

on the bright side you got a personal reply from a hindu god

'scuse my ignorance but... (1, Interesting)

fiannaFailMan (702447) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633481)

Is VHS gonna stick around for another while? I know it can be a nightmare to program those things and stuff, but it strikes me as an underrated bit of technology. Are there issues with recording cable? I seem to remember my landlord in England recording digital TV content onto an ancient, top-loading VCR. Sure there are a lot of things that a TiVo can do that a VCR can't, but you pay a high price for this. A bit like an autogyro being a lot cheaper but slightly more limted than a helicopter.

Re:'scuse my ignorance but... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633527)

Not really. A high quality VCR still goes for quite a bit. A TIVO wouldn't be that much more. Plus the monthly fee isn't too bad.

It is all about convience. Pay a monthly service fee, or buy a new tape every month (if you constantly use the tape the quality degrades VERY fast). Get a high quality VCR or a TIVO.

If you don't use it that much, then obviously it makes no sense to get a TIVO. But if you would rather have a life druing prime time and watch your shows when you want to...then get one.

It is a personal preference.

MOD PARENT UP (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633565)

How the hell is _that_ offtopic? Sheesh!

It'll fade out (1)

Synn (6288) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633672)

VHS will probably fade out of use like audio cassette tapes have. CDR is cheap and there are a lot of other ways to record sound media, so you don't really need audio cassettes anymore.

DVD recording is getting to be pretty cheap and you have VCR alternatives, like Tivo, that will probably become more and more common(like cable companies implementing the technology), so eventually VHS will just become pointless.

forget MCE (5, Interesting)

BitchAss (146906) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633486)

It's been covered a million times here, but MythTV does more than MCE or Tivo.

One day I gave MCE a try and found it to be a dreadfull experience. Sure, some of the widgets and transitions were nice - and the remote was pretty sexy (anyone wanna help me write a driver for Linux?), but it just left me wanting more.

I have most of my media living on a different machine - MCE had a hard time dealing with that. I had to import my mp3s (not oggs - god forbid) into Media Player before MCE would recognize them.

Large movies were a pain too - MCE wanted a nice screen shot of each movie - so a directory with 10-15 divxs was painful to browse.

I have MythTV set up with a PVR-250 and it's the best thing ever. Automatic commercial flagging? check Windows? Not even. So much better.

Re:forget MCE (5, Informative)

BRock97 (17460) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633605)

- and the remote was pretty sexy (anyone wanna help me write a driver for Linux?)

Take a look at the LIRC 0.7.0 snapshots [] . The Microsoft remote has been in there for quite some time and works well. In fact, you can use the IR receiver that comes with it and quite a few compatible IR remotes.

I have MythTV set up with a PVR-250 and it's the best thing ever.

Hear hear! I have a Myth server running two Hauppauge PVR 250s [] and it is smooth. The guide is smart enough that I just select two shows to record and it handles the rest. The best part is that I have a Myth client running in the main TV room that is a stripped down Dell 4600c [] which I got refurbished for $360that fits perfectly into the entertainment center. All the advantages of the two tuners, but the quiet-ness of a small form factor PC. Awesome stuff AND two TVs can use the same recording repository!

Re:forget MCE (1, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633653)

"It's been covered a million times here, but MythTV does more than MCE or Tivo."

Ah...its the my penis is bigger syndrome yet again.

You fuckers got left behind by the jocks that had more adequate physiology and now make up for it with gadgets.

When will you learn, its not that one can do more -- its how how well it does the little things -- you know the most important items. I don't fucking care how well it will play some random fucking obscure format that no one but guy with blueballs living in their parents basements will play. I want it to play MP3s and WAVs and AAC (even if its just the unprotected kind). I need it to play DVDs and maybe VCDs...I don't give a fuck about DIVX. Flac??? Do I look like a fucking smelly hippy that wants to play the dead and phish in lossless encoding? No -- If I cared that much, I'd have burned them to CD and played them as full audio.

You fuckwads want everything and don't give a damn about ease of use. I'm sick of hearing how the fucking iRiver is better than my iPod because it can WiFi porn from your bluetooth camera (yeah, I hears they got a majik converter that can do that) and holodisplay it at 30 ft by 25.


I'm sure MCE is even nicer than fucking Myth. I hate Microsoft, but they don't make shit as bad as geeks left to their own devices do. Hey!!! If we put pretty pictures here and make it skinable, it will be more user friendly. This is the exact attitude why its NOT userfriendly.

I'd take MCE over Myth any day...but I'd take Tivo over that because it doesn one fucking thing and it does it well.

Fuckwads -- yes this is flamebait. And its true. Its also Insiteful. So fucking just mod this Inciteful.

How many fucking idiots won't even get that. Morons.

Re:forget MCE (4, Informative)

xplosiv (129880) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633704)

There is a reason Microsoft does not sell MCE over the counter, it's to avoid experiences such as yours. In order to provide a good experience, Microsoft provides minimum requirements to the OEM's in order to have a very optimized machine.

If you were truly interested in giving MCE a try, you would have found that some of the bigger sites dedicated to this OS have articles/posts telling you how to disable this movie preview and how to deal with some of the other issues. Since you had this problem, I assume you downloaded a copy yourself, and didn't actually buy/test an OEM machine with MCE preconfigured.

Last time I checked (few months ago), MythTV didn't support the FM tuner in the PVR series cards, Linux didn't support the RCA output on my Radeon 7000 series card (plenty of people use these cards in windows machines, including myself, without any problems), the remote was really hard to configure due to the lack of drivers, and the machine could not run 24/7 for more than a few days without running into some sort of problems.

MythTV is a great application (I will be building another MythTV machine once I have more hardware), but unlike MCE, it isn't meant for the average consumer (which obviously you aren't, as you like to tinker), who in the end will determine which DVR/PVR 'OS' will become the dominant platform.

Apples and Oranges (5, Insightful)

WizzleWizzleWizzle (697435) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633492)

It seems to me that there will always be two markets; device and PC-based. Even if MCE is a pre-packaged, Microsoft deal, it still involves a desktop computer which not everyone has, or even, *gulp*, wants!

Some people will always like to be able to control what is going on and configure their own system. Others will want nothing to do with configuration of any kind and will simply want it to work. Until M$ spins the MCE off into a device or integrates it with X-Box or whatever, the PC'ness of it will remain its barrier of entry to the mainstream.

I deal with computers all day long and when I get time to watch TV, the last thing I want to think about are computers.

Re:Apples and Oranges (1)

KJE (640748) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633652)

It doesn't seem to have been released, but Microsoft has something up about Media Center Extender for Xbox [] .

Component interoperability? (4, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633495)

I was reading a magazine article a couple of weeks ago that made the claim that Windows Media Center is the emerging standard for component interconnect and control. IE, in the future you aren't going to have a different remote control for each component in your home theater system, but instead everything is going to be simply controlled through a Windows Media Center PC-like device. The magazine claimed ~250 vendors had already signed on (including many big names).

I found this rather disheartening: Microsoft taking over yet another market. Sigh...

FWIW, I don't remember the name of the magazine, but it was some god-awful Home Theater magazine that is really just an excuse for advertising.

Re:Component interoperability? (2, Interesting)

Leadmagnet (685892) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633683)

I wasn't just for home theater control but "Whole House Automation" e.i. media, security, lighting, and HVAC.

As long as (2)

Bravid98 (171307) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633513)

As long as there are cable boxes with svideo or RCA jacks there won't be anything stopping MythTV or MCE from recording the streams.

Re:As long as (2, Insightful)

realmolo (574068) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633577)

I agree, but it's likely that we'll see consumer AV gear WITHOUT analog outputs in the fairly near future.

The companies that make that stuff just can't WAIT to lock you out with DRM-protected IO ports. They talk about it all the time.

All the INDUCE Act is going to mean . . . (5, Insightful)

base3 (539820) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633545)

. . . even if it does pass, is that vendors are going to be very careful when describng a product to only include non-infringing uses in its marketing material. It would be instructional to go look at the old ads for the GoVideo dual deck VCR. They talked about its lawful purposes, while revealing enough that someone with two brain cells would think "Whoa! I could use this to copiez teh movies!"

Main reason I (and others) use Tivo (5, Informative)

SilentChris (452960) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633554)

No, not Linux. No, not even ease of use. Picture quality with DirecTV. DirecTV with Tivo is the only solution I've seen that captures the satellite's MPEG stream perfectly, while still providing a usable interface (hear me, Dish Network?)

I'd seriously consider building my own set, but there is no solution out there that doesn't have some analog to digital conversion at some point. And yes, it matters. Particularly if you have a 40" HDTV. Digital cable/satellite compression is pretty visible as it is; adding an analog conversion makes it look hideous.

In my idea world, I'd have a media PC that played DVDs, stored CDs, streamed direct digital television (like my Tivo) and (as a luxury) was wirelessly connected to the internet. All of these features exist as different pieces in other machines, but no one has them all together.

I used MCE on a Toshiba notebook and other PVRs... (3, Informative)

antdude (79039) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633573)

To me, it is nice for a simple PVR but it is sure buggy to me. A few times, I actually had blue screens of death.

I also use ATI's Multimedia Center (MMC) for my gaming box with ATI Radeon 9800 All-In-Wonder (AIW) card. The software is nice with features, but also buggy (crashes a lot). There are a lot of features I miss like recording captions other than VCR video file format, being able to pause on demand while using scheduled recording like TV-On-Demand, etc.

TiVo and other hardware PVRs are better since they don't crash like computers due to various settings, setup, hardwares, etc.

What about the A/V Vendors? (4, Interesting)

grunt107 (739510) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633586)

A few years back the major a/v mfgs (like Yamaha, Denon, Pioneer) were supposedly agreeing on a common interface to their components, which could also be controlled by outside (read: PC) components. Has any of this gone forward? I would prefer the sonic advantage of standalone components, but would love to have server access (and use a live web connect as another "component"). Then MythTV (or TiVo) could be just another component enhanced by the home theatre system.

Oddly? (4, Informative)

Mr_Silver (213637) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633602)

Oddly, all recordings defaulted to starting five minutes before the scheduled time.

Not really. Back in the days when you had to manually enter the start and end time of a programme and set the clock by hand it was common for people to set the video to start 5 minutes before and let it run up to 15 minutes after.

This was to ensure that if your clock was slow, you didn't miss the first minute or so and if it overran, you didn't miss the crucial last scenes.

Even software such as Gemstars Video+ system puts 5 minutes before and 10 minutes after by default.

Of course in this day and age of self correcting clocks, on screen programming and the special tag that tells you when a programme finishes this buffer probably makes less and less sense.

Canada as safe haven (4, Interesting)

antarctican (301636) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633604)

See, if I had the time and money I'd setup a company here in Canada where we don't have these insane laws limited consumer rights. Yes, it's getting worse up here, but for now I see this as the near-by safe haven for developing PVR type products safe from being sued.

Yes, importing could be restricted, but it's not stopping us from sending you guys cheaper drugs to get around that piece of insanity by your government - catering to all of big business' demands....

So look north, let us develop your PVRs, it'll be good for us, you'll have more freedom, and I can only hope we're sane enough to never let our government pass such outrageous laws.... Move MythTV's code base off-shore or north.... such a great solution. :)

Language evolution note: "setup" (0, Offtopic)

ColonelPanic (138077) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633766)

I've noticed over the past six months in Web content and corporate e-mail a fascinating increase in verb contractions. What used to be a two-word verb form, "set up", has contracted to a single word, "setup", which hitherto had been used only as a noun (e.g., "hey, look at my cool computer setup here").

This is a meme that's spreading quickly. I'm curious how far it will go. Do those people who write "setup" as a verb also write "throwup" as one yet?

Yes, I know about the comparable German verb forms.

my MCE experience (5, Insightful)

xplosiv (129880) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633608)

As someone who built his own MCE 2004 based machine, I have to admit I am VERY impressed with this OS. There is no way I would buy a TIVO now as I can customize this machine with any codecs and plugins I want and do as I please. People who say that the PC doesn't belong in the living room will have to wake up, Microsoft has figured this out a long time ago and are on the right track (there is still lots of room for improvement of course).

My MCE 2004 machine (which runs 24/7) is 100% stable (the OS is based on XP sp1), even when keeping up to date with all the patches out there. I ended up getting rid of my SA8000 DVR from time warner because it is so reliable. There are addons out there such as the plugin which provides a nice interface to the video library (you pick the movie by clicking the 'cover', and it will automatically mount the ISO), or the web based interface. Add the fact that you can listen to FM radio using a PVR250MCE or PVR350 series TV tuner card, and you have a very nice entertainment machine. The only thing which comes close to this setup is MythTV (which I do like), but has some reliability & configuration issues which aren't user friendly.

Since MCE can't be bought legally (you can only download it when you have a MSDN license), I will be 'buying' a second MCE machine once the next release comes out, and network the 2 machines (and other custom PVR machines which can share video data) so I can watch my video/dvd/broadcast anywhere in the house.

Re:my MCE experience (4, Insightful)

spagma (514837) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633678)

Say what you want about Tivo, but I dont have to worry about my tivo getting hacked because I did visit windows update on a regular basis.

Re:my MCE experience (1)

xplosiv (129880) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633753)

I haven't seen a post yet where a person complained their MCE based machine shows funny pictures ;) The only reason MCE should get to the internet is for the Guide update (which is free btw, unlike with Tivo), and windows updates. If you run a hardware/software firewall, or turn on the internal firewall, you will be just fine, even if you don't patch. If you decide to use the machine as a regular PC, well then you can't compare the Tivo and PC as they both are meant to do different things in that case, which is a different topic.

morons vs. robbIE's fauxking PostBlock censorship (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633629)

devise? it's whoreabully infactdead yet.

hobbyists whiners shine vs. j. public?

the kindumb lameNTdead again today, that over 1/3 of 'software' in use, is pierated, &/or ?stolen?, so to speak?

the gnu generation of open/honest communications/commerce, requires 0 (as in none) copyrightdead nazi felon BugWear, to function optimally.

no contest really? & just look at all the headaches/embarrassmeNT to be avoided?

consult with/trust in yOUR creators.... supplying everything we need, since/until forever. see you there?

robbIE's pateNTdead PostBlock censorship devise kode, is unwanted/infactdead in both pools?

PC will be the clear winner... (4, Interesting)

MaestroSartori (146297) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633641)

...for those of us in the UK, at least as long as there continues to be no new Tivo kit worth buying. There are some decent PVRs apparently, but I'm told they all fall short on various aspects...

This is all fine and good to compare, but... (3, Interesting)

Not_Wiggins (686627) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633655)

With the push to move towards digital-only signaling, the PC is going to get squeezed out.

I'm all for PC-based PVRs, but I have digital cable. The thought of re-encoding an MPEG2 stream that has already been encoded and decoded once really blows (especially when the compression they've used is so freakin' high to start).

At least with TiVo, one can record the original stream un-decoded. Even then, this isn't an option for me as I don't have satellite (it is supposed to be coming "soon" for digital cable boxes).

And I can't imagine that with the security wrapped into those digital receivers any of those companies are going to be hot to support a PC-based digital decoder card.

Hate to say it, but when it comes to quality, I think the "receiver with integrated pvr functionality" is going to win out. 8/

gmail account (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633656) 5af

Re:gmail account (-1, Offtopic)

vegetablespork (575101) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633684)


Re:gmail account (0, Offtopic)

motte_fra (682157) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633701)

you're welcome

TiVo is a Linux based PC. (4, Interesting)

foooo (634898) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633657)

TiVo is a Linux based PC. It is hackable enough to do a *lot* of interesting things that you can't on a normal TiVo.

The reason why TiVo corporation doesn't support this "hacking" actively is that they need to be legally insulated from lawsuits.


Full Service Entertainment (5, Insightful)

eltoyoboyo (750015) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633694)

The MCE box is a general-purpose WIndows XP machine, so you can use it as a web browser, email terminal, and game machine. ... Of course, the downside of this is that you have to keep your MCE up to date on patches and fixes-- something that might be an unwanted hassle for people who don't live patch management every day.

So as long as you keep it disconnected from the internet, you are better off until MS figures out how to deliver TCP/IP safety to the masses. The MCE is feature rich and aimed towards providing a full entertainment control center for audio components (AF/FM CD/TAPE/Record Player/Digital jukebox) as well as video components (PVR/Tuner/DVD Player/Digital jukebox). The internet connectivity or broadband cable/satellite are going to be part of the experience too. So Microsoft is going to have to address the security problems to make this fully marketable. It is not going to do well if it has a big sticker that says "Warning: do not connect to the Internet".

Dish Network offerings (3, Informative)

GweeDo (127172) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633715)

I wonder when we are going to see Dish Networks (EchoStar) DVR offerings in these kind of comparisions. They have been advertising them a TON and now you can actually get a DVR from them for free (lease, not own). I have a Dish DVR 522 and there was no hardware costs to me at all. I don't own my dish, I don't own my receiver. But I do have a 120GB DVR with dual tuners that can feed to two tv's (each watching a different stream). While some might complain about the interface (maybe they are talking about older 5XX models), I find the 522 very easy to use. They have also announced that they will be adding support for loading pictures, mp3s and the like to it via the USB input soon.

WAF? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 10 years ago | (#9633716)

The Wife Acceptance Factor may not play a big role for Slashdot readers.

More like: Get I get pr0n delivered to the video screen through a command line keyboard interface? Preferably a command that uses keys only on one side of the keyboard...

Hidden cost of TiVo (2, Informative)

EvanKai (218260) | more than 10 years ago | (#9633743)

When something is advertised as being broadband enabled, I kind of expected an ethernet port on the TiVo I bought. Instead you have to buy a USB ethernet adapter which TiVo wants $40 for. You can find compatible adapters [] for $15 and this wouldn't be much of a problem if I didn't need 6 TiVo's to work togther for a research project about media coverage of election poll results.

The idea was to use the TiVo's to record several hours of several stations' election coverage. We went with TiVo vs. ReplayTV because we could easily move video to a TiVo with a DVD burner to archive content.

With Replays WITH ethernet starting at $79, 6 of those with a patch panel and a stand-alone DVD burner would have been a better buy.

Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?