Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

GIMP 2.2 Splash Screen Competition

CmdrTaco posted more than 9 years ago | from the your-work-in-lights dept.

The Gimp 257

Lalakis writes "The GIMP 2.2 Splash Contest is now officially open! Competition entries should be attached to the live.gnome.org wiki before midnight next Sunday. Submit your work and get the glory (there may be a small prize sponsored, too)."

cancel ×

257 comments

My Favorite Splash Screen (5, Insightful)

stecoop (759508) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953076)

The only good Splash Screen is a dead one.

How about having no splash screen as an option and let everyone else stare at the pretty picture for N seconds. I have so many windows open that I don't need to have something else occupying my desktop. To me, splash screens are annoying like browser popups - which I haven't seen in months thanks Mozzy that also has the alias & shortcut command option of nosplash.

How many windows? (1, Insightful)

nurb432 (527695) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953109)

How many windows can you have open when your desktop is just starting?

Re:My Favorite Splash Screen (5, Informative)

Meostro (788797) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953125)

As per the link in the mighty $ [slashdot.org] 's post below, start gimp with
gimp -s
to disable the spalsh screen completely.

Re:My Favorite Splash Screen (5, Insightful)

stecoop (759508) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953158)

There should be a universal standard for all application in the development community where the command --nosplash will disable splash screens.

Re:My Favorite Splash Screen (3, Insightful)

shufler (262955) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953212)

An environment variable would be a better option, because really -- if you disable the splash screen on one program, don't you also want to disable it on all programs?

Re:My Favorite Splash Screen (2, Interesting)

DaHat (247651) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953332)

True... but the problem with trying to go with an environmental variable for such an option is at what point does it stop?

There are plenty of application level settings that could be offloaded to the environment with envars permitting more uniform settings on a system... but the standardization of even a portion of such possibilities would be a nightmare. Better to leave each app alone as their own island.

Re:My Favorite Splash Screen (2, Funny)

Pxtl (151020) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953380)

Gee, its too bad Linux doesn't have a single, consolidated tree-based system for storing type-specific environment variables. It would be handy for registryng such things.

j/k.

One flat file per app is fine, thanks. Alternately, the Windows registry wouldn't be so bad if it was easy to find keys related to program X or Y (rather than its sluggish search) and the damn thing had some form of docstrings. If Python has tought me one thing, its that you can never have too many docstrings.

My Favorite Splash Screen-GConf. (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953474)

"Gee, its too bad Linux doesn't have a single, consolidated tree-based system for storing type-specific environment variables. It would be handy for registryng such things."

Like GConf?

Re:My Favorite Splash Screen (0)

nocomment (239368) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953530)

Actually something ore akin to the Mac's preferences file would probably work a lot better than a registry-type of system would.

Re:My Favorite Splash Screen (3, Insightful)

oexeo (816786) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953203)

> The only good Splash Screen is a dead one.

They do have a purpose though, they hide the fact the program takes forever to initialize

Re:My Favorite Splash Screen (2, Insightful)

DocSnyder (10755) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953397)

A status bar or a progress window would serve better than any nice picture.

Why not delegate splash screens to a special daemon which can be decorated with skins, docked into the KDE/GNOME panel or just deactivated?

Java Programs Need Them (2, Insightful)

the_mighty_$ (726261) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953225)

Actually, some splash screens are good for something. Think about Java programs that have to be runtime compiled, they usually take long times to load. In a case like that, a splash screen is extremely useful.

[Windows] Programs Need Them (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953293)

"Think about Java programs that have to be runtime compiled, they usually take long times to load. In a case like that, a splash screen is extremely useful."

Or when you're installing, or starting up MS Windows.

Re:My Favorite Splash Screen (1)

tod_miller (792541) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953358)

Splash screens were developed to show loading of application, and branding of application.

I hate the M$ office splashscreens [haha been a looong time since I saw a M$ splashscreen!, the open officeone is required at the startup time (hopefully 1.5 will stop that) is exagerrated because all office startup dlls are precached.

If you use the open office starter this helps too.

Anyway, In Korea, only old people have so many windows open.

Re:My Favorite Splash Screen (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953626)

I agree that there are cases when splash screens are annoying.
However, as there are at least 4 separate categories of applications as spelled out by experts in the industry, and not all of them are what you do. Your statement that they are 'evil' seems is untrue.

In the case of a device, for example, a robotic control system, having a touch-screen GUI that needs to boot, and in the case that this GUI will not be available for some seconds until the system makes all of it's connections and sets-up all of it's devices, the splash screen is a useful and necessary part of the system design.

The clients who are using this control system don't use it or the touch screen for anything else. They are not provented from doing other useful things because if they need to do these then they do them at their desks on another machine. They shouldn't be surfing the web or playing hextris on that box. The box is for running robotic automation. They would be able to do these things if we did not prohibit it by using a splash screen. And using these toys (the browser or a video game) may actually be an unsafe thing to do with these machines. In actuallity, we didn't load the games on those boxes, but the browser was their.

So, in all cases for all things splash screens are not 'evil'.

Please reserve the word 'evil' for use with things that are actually problems hurting other people. Otherwise you cheepen the English language and spread paranoia and needless anxiety.

FP (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953078)

FP

Fristy (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953079)

Post!

DO I FAIL IT???

Ken Jennings LOSES Tonight 11/30 (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953086)

Ken jennings loses tonight 11/30 on final jeapordy.

Re:Ken Jennings LOSES Tonight 11/30 (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953219)

I heard that rumor too, he loses during his 75th episode...

Hmm (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953087)

I wonder how many submissions of the Goatse guy they'll recieve.

PARENT MOD SMOKED CRACK ! (2, Interesting)

mirko (198274) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953361)

I don't think the parent was off topic : this is Slashdot and there are trolls who may profit from this open Wiki page so, be sure there will be many flavoured submissions, including the goatse, tubgirl, lemon party, GNAA manifestoes...
It's a serious question and even if it could be seen as either frightening or funny, I do NOT think it's off topic.

Re:PARENT MOD SMOKED CRACK ! (1)

DemENtoR (582030) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953505)

Congrats fellow slashdoters, we are the biggest creep magnet on the net.

GIMP Splash Screens (4, Informative)

the_mighty_$ (726261) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953094)

You can find out more about GIMP splash screens [gimp.org]

Or you can steal one (1)

Uukrul (835197) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953273)

Or [openoffice.org] you [openoffice.org] can [openoffice.org] steal [openoffice.org] one [openoffice.org] from other open source projects [openoffice.org] .
OpenOffice.org license [openoffice.org] permits just do that, or it doesn't.

will my submisson get disqualified (5, Funny)

hsmith (818216) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953095)

if i do it in Photoshop?

Re:will my submisson get disqualified (0, Flamebait)

jellomizer (103300) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953115)

I dont see why not. It is a lot easier to do these types of graphics in photoshop. Plus there seems to be more avenues of support as well.

Re:will my submisson get disqualified (2, Funny)

TheSurfer (560640) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953187)

Not if you re-save the file afterwards in The Gimp ;)

Re:will my submisson get disqualified (1)

xortw (767546) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953255)

No, but Photoshop can't open the xcf template.

Better than a splash screen ... (-1, Redundant)

YetAnotherName (168064) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953099)

... is an option to start the application without it. (I'm talking to you, Adobe!)

/me hugs my Gimp plushie ...

Re:Better than a splash screen ... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953123)

but but, how will all my important fonts be checked without a splash screen?

In Korea (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953101)

Old people splash you!

Re:In Korea (0)

ImSoRonery (821613) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953366)

In Korea, I'm so ronery!!!

BRING OUT THE GIMP (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953129)

The Gimp's asleep

Well I guess you better wake him up then

Spash Archive (2, Interesting)

Ford Prefect (8777) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953130)

Something I've liked in the past from compiling development versions of the Gimp are the development splash screens [gimp.org] . Frequently containing giant photos of bugs (for squashing, obviously), fake news report screengrabs or some other warped aspects of the programmers' humour, they often show that programmer art isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Although a couple of them were astoundingly crude - but I think that was intentional. :-)

WARNING: Gimp.org pictures (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953350)

... are of "The Gimp" development splash screens.

Gee what a bad name for a program, count they now call it something more professional.

(NOT the Pro Gimp, or Gimp Pro)

Name change (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953131)

Since "pulp fiction", the name is a serious barrier to adoption.

CinePaint is a reasonable name (but has generally fallen way behind GIMP proper). Can we have a reverse takeover like NeXT and Apple, with the CinePaint name (and remaining high-color features) but the main GIMP branch?

Re:Name change (1)

suso (153703) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953224)

Over-zealous parents and school teachers are a serious barrier to the adoption of anything in America.

It is not a good reason to change the name simply because people can't accept that the words don't carry the meaning, but how you use them does. After all, check out the latest TV trailers for "Meet the Fockers" (Sequel to Meet the Parents). How can that be socially acceptable title (it may yet not be) and "The Gimp" not be?

And the winner is... (5, Funny)

CodeWanker (534624) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953136)

Goatse! Goatse! Goatse!

Re:And the winner is... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953258)

If that's the winner, everyone who sees the image while starting the program ends up losing it... ;)

Re:And the winner is... (5, Funny)

archen (447353) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953290)

That's one way to force development to get Gimp to load as fast as possible.

Re:And the winner is... (1)

ceeam (39911) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953394)

Fuck man, your sig is so fitting.

Re:And the winner is... (1)

Enrico Pulatzo (536675) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953633)

I was thinking the same thing. The grandparent may want to consider rewording "Pacific Rim job."

I'm hoping.. (2, Funny)

schon (31600) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953469)

I'm hoping that This guy [earlham.edu] enters - his work just screams "professionalism".

YRO: They censor the images! (0, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953138)

I submitted a goatse.cx image and they turned it down. Who are they to think someone might not want that!

Re:YRO: They censor the images! (1)

ceeam (39911) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953420)

Well, it's a painting program. You can't just use arbitrary image. Something should tell that it's a painting program. Add brushes and pencils sticking out of it, I dunno... Be creative!

In Korea...... (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953145)

The GIMP 2.2 Splash Contest is only open to old people.

What's with the animated icon? (4, Funny)

Xetrov (267777) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953149)

That animated topic icon sent me through a rollercoaster of emotions:

1. I was scared - been playing Doom3 all day, I'm a bit jumpy
2. Denial - I thought I imagined it
3. Relief - I'm not crazy
4. Disgust - I just wasted a few minutes of my life describing an emotional journey spawned by a few moving pixels on /.

Re:What's with the animated icon? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953228)

What animated icon?

Re:What's with the animated icon? (3, Informative)

CvD (94050) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953267)

Slashdot's topic icon for the GIMP is animated (the only animated icon). Watch his eyes. :-)

Re:What's with the animated icon? (1)

imroy (755) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953363)

I thought the Tux icon was also animated. Don't his eyes move also?

Re:What's with the animated icon? (1)

bersl2 (689221) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953387)

When did this happen?

Re:What's with the animated icon? (1)

oexeo (816786) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953392)

> Slashdot's topic icon for the GIMP is animated (the only animated icon). Watch his eyes. :-) It's almost hypnotic ...

Well, that explains why all I get is two dots. (1)

Vengeance (46019) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953413)

I don't like animated gifs and such jumping around on my screen.

Unfortunately, that means that /.s GIMP icon is just the eyeballs, and looks rather silly.

What would be better (4, Insightful)

oexeo (816786) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953152)

This competition is great, but maybe a "design GIMP a decent fucking GUI" contest would be better?

Re:What would be better (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953229)

Why is this troll? it's a genuine on-topic point

Re:What would be better (1)

Fallingcow (213461) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953257)

Parent is a troll? Yeah, probably.

Parent is correct? Yep.

Re:What would be better (1)

oexeo (816786) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953278)

I wasn't trolling, at least not intentionally. The GIMP (in my opinion) does have a very bad GUI, and this deserves far more focus, than the fairly irrelevant splash screen.

What would be better-Being On Topic for a change. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953344)

However the story is about the Splash Screen, not your pet hates. If you really want an ontopic post? I suggest you get the GIMP guys to submit a "Hate the GIMP? Tell us more." story to Slashdot. Then you'll get all the +5 Insightfuls you can stand.

Re:What would be better (2, Interesting)

Fallingcow (213461) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953347)

Eh, sorry then, just assumed it was. Posts like that on Gimp stories are usually trolls. In spite of that, I usually agree with them :(

The Gimp GUI is on of the most crap-tastic ones I've ever seen. Sad, because it's a nice program, but I can never get anyone to use for any length of time because the GUI is so frustrating and non-intuitive.

Re:What would be better (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953409)

Actually, I find it quite good, what is the problem ? Is it the fact that the toolbar and the pictures are not contained in another big window that bothers you so much ? If that's the case, just use a separate desktop for Gimp, and give it a grey background, you won't notice the difference.

Re:What would be better (1)

oexeo (816786) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953468)

I'm not the parent, but one of my major issues is the lack of previews for filters, applying an un-sharp mask (as an example) to an image, with no preview box is extremely time-consuming, and a major issue in my opinion.

Re:What would be better (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953594)

It may be fixed in Gimp 2.2, then

http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/WhatsNew2

Re:What would be better (2, Informative)

Lalakis (308990) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953595)

The pending 2.2 release will add previews for most filters. Unsharp mask included... You can find a list of what's new in this release here [gimp.org] .

Re:What would be better (4, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953348)

I'll add my 2c here in agreement.

I started out in graphics with gimp. I had enough interest in pixelling to want to continue, to learn the roped and put up with the difficulties. I'd been TOLD that graphics was hard, and it was tedious indeed.

Then I used Photoshop, ready to scoff at the proprietary solution costing so many thousands and doing no more than gimp. Within 2 weeks I'd gone out and bought photoshop because no matter how much you listen to someone else's experience with a program, there is nothing more revealing than using it yourself. Gimp feels nearly feature complete, but in the same way a large rock is feature complete with a set of six various sized hammers. When you need to hit something and do it right, the hammers let you do it exactly how you want to.

Photoshop is a set of hammers.

Re:What would be better (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953386)

That's just like saying that the Java people should work on building a language more like Python, instead of polishing Java. Just like some people like Java, some people think Gimp's GUI is better than Photoshop's, so please let them keep it.

This whole debate/troll about Gimp's GUI is not about bugs or incompleteness, it's about choices that have been made. This GUI is not buggy, it doesn't lack important features, but they made the choice to not copy Photoshop, and that's what it's all about. Don't like these choices ? Fork it and make a Photshop-like GUI. But don't remove the ability to like Gimp from us.

Re:What would be better (1)

oexeo (816786) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953623)

That's just like saying that the Java people should work on building a language more like Python, instead of polishing Java. [...] This GUI is not buggy, it doesn't lack important features, but they made the choice to not copy Photoshop, and that's what it's all about.

This is true with some features (or lack of), but others are just common sense usability, for example: GIMP's lack previews for most filters.

Re:What would be better (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953353)

Moderation: -1, Truth

Note to those who would smugly comment that complainers "mysteriously quieted down" with the release of the 2.0 GUI: No, it still sucks.

Re:What would be better (1)

DemENtoR (582030) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953473)

Bitch Bitch Bitch!

Fix one thing, some one else will complain about something else (rember the font issues, now they are fine, so people just bitch other things X). I guess this is /. and everyone is an arm chair critic.

Personaly, I find the UI fine for doing all the jobs that I need to get done (granted it's not a lot). I'm sure it could use a little more polish, since the 2 series you can link multiple windows into one anyways.

how about... (4, Insightful)

flacco (324089) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953164)

...one that says "*Still* only 8-bit color!"

Re:how about... (5, Interesting)

Lalakis (308990) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953288)

Most people don't really need it, but more than 8-bit per pixel color is coming soon. Next release (2.4) will add color management capabilities and the one after that (3.0), planned for the next fall, will add higher bit depth, layer effects and pretty much everything you want (all that because of the GEGL library intergration).

Re:how about... (2, Insightful)

Queuetue (156269) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953410)

Could you point towards a roadmap for Gimp development? (And please tell me they are working to improve the text layer tools! :) )

Re:how about... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953534)

Are you sure most people don't need 8 bit color? Have you tried using the brush tool with a very small opacity setting in an 8 bit painting program? The results look terrible thanks to low precision numbers. Brushes of low opacity are useful for adding shadows and highlights to drawings.

Re:how about... (1)

imroy (755) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953462)

...or one that says "This one isn't for critics! [penny-arcade.com] " :)

As they say... (0, Offtopic)

slvi (628811) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953174)

in Korea, only old people splash.

Oh wait.

Korea (-1, Offtopic)

weenis (656512) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953175)

In Korea, Competitions Are Only For Old People

Re:Korea (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953256)

In the US, these jokes are old.

Re:Korea (-1)

m50d (797211) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953330)

Don't you mean "In Korea, only old people make these jokes"?

OpenOffice.org (2, Informative)

Uukrul (835197) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953177)

OpenOffice.org it's seeking a new Splash Screen too. (Splashscreen for OpenOffice.org 2.0 Wanted [slashdot.org]
One Splash Screen, two opportunities to win.

And remeber to make it really evil [slashdot.org] .

OpenOffice.org-Slashdot. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953235)

Since everyone's doing a Splash screen. How about one for Slashdot?

"You've just loaded Slashdot. A picture of Rob Malda pops up showing hime eating a sandwich"

Re:OpenOffice.org-Slashdot. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953456)

Here's a good one.

link [slashdot.org]

A Plush Prize. (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953179)

"Submit your work and get the glory (there may be a small prize sponsored, too)."

A Wilbur (The GIMP Mascot) plushie.

ASCII Trolls (1)

oexeo (816786) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953180)

The ASCII trolls can be on-topic for a change

While they're at it... (3, Interesting)

jejones (115979) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953251)

...could they also ditch the ghastly font the splash screen uses for "the gimp"?

background load while using it would be nice (4, Insightful)

jago25_98 (566531) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953253)

I'd prefer to be able to use it while it loads the bigger things like plugins in the background.

Waiting (about 30 seconds?) is a pain when you only want to edit an 16 pixel icon especially.

p.s. aren't message boxes also awful too, interrupting work and stealing focus... oh, I had typed more but lost it all after gimp loaded up and changed focus while I was typing and looking at keyboard.

Re:background load while using it would be nice (2, Interesting)

BigSven (57510) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953369)

30 seconds? It's more like 5 seconds. The first startup is slow since all plug-ins need to be queried but this info is cached and subsequent startup is a lot faster.

I do have some ideas though that would reduce the startup time further. Some of this might make into GIMP 2.4...

In Korea... (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953254)

SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY!

In Corea... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953262)

GIMP is only used by the elderly

In this country (2, Funny)

jasonbowen (683345) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953281)

first you get the splash screen... then you get the power... then you get the women

In Korea.... (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953287)

...only old people Gimp!

fi8st post (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953294)

foolowed. Obviously

now with voting (1)

Mach5 (3371) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953323)

FINALLY, slashdot is competing with fark for valuable photoshop market share

In Korea... (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953355)

... splash screens are for old people.

Wait a minute! (5, Funny)

scorpionsoft (590852) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953395)

Maybe the prize should be a free copy of the GIMP!!??

Wrong site? (1)

pragma_x (644215) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953451)

Shouldn't this be a Fark photoshop contest instead?

[Photoshop] - Create these guys [slashdot.org] a new splash screen. Decent farking GUI to follow.

how about a better name (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953501)

photoshop sounds like what it does. Gimp sounds like someone on crutches. perhaps "better than crack" as a possible name <sarcasm>

Or my all-time favorite... (1)

thegnu (557446) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953568)

pornview.

I wish I had thought of that. And knew how to code. I've of course never used pornview because I view my pr0n in feature film version. And on DVD. Because when you cheat the adult industry, you're really only cheating yourself.

Goatse (-1, Offtopic)

mtrupe (156137) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953527)

How about the Goatse guy?

What The Gimp really needs for professionals (3, Insightful)

SpamJunkie (557825) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953554)

...is a new name.

Few management types are going to approve of using a BDSM-themed program no matter how free it is.

The attempt at making a cute raccoon-like animal the mascot doesn't help. We all know that he's wearing nothing but leather and pain below the neck.

Gimp and SATAN (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#10953634)

I once had an interview for a job once, it later transpired that they only wanted to see me as I have 'The GIMP' and 'SATAN' mentioned on my CV :-)

Didn't get the job & didn't want it after that anyway!

I can't wait to submit (1)

alta (1263) | more than 9 years ago | (#10953584)

This is so exciting, I'm going to fire up my copy of photoshop right now and make them a great splash screen! ;)
Load More Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...