×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

cancel ×
This is a preview of your comment

No Comment Title Entered

Anonymous Coward 1 minute ago

No Comment Entered

470 comments

awesome... (4, Funny)

bje2 (533276) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244486)

saw these pics this morning...the general greivous pictures look awesome...what's up with the "x-wing" type fighters though? they appear to have an extra wing in the middle...

the wookie going for nookie picture at the top of the page cracked me up...

Re:awesome... (4, Funny)

Lev13than (581686) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244547)

I dunno about these pics. In this one [idontfear.com], it looks like Hayden and his bestest buddy just completed a succesful assault on a cheap costume shop in order to get ready for Thursday's bitchin' Halloween kegger down at the Tri-Lams.

Protest George W. Bush's Inauguration: +1, True (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244604)


Let democracy reign. Visit Washington, D.C. on January 20, 2005 and show your support AGAINST the
world's most dangerous and inarticulate "leader" [whitehouse.org]

Thanks in advance,
Kilgore Trout, CTO

Re:Protest George W. Bush's Inauguration: +1, True (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244670)

Kerry lost so you can cancel this.

Re:awesome... (2, Funny)

Pig Hogger (10379) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244832)

what's up with the "x-wing" type fighters though? they appear to have an extra wing in the middle...
That's probably in case they decide to get out an X-rated version of the movie...

Re:awesome... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244909)

...what's up with the "x-wing" type fighters though? they appear to have an extra wing in the middle...

Why, its the Dub'ya Dub'ya Wing!

new title (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244507)

revenge of the slashdotters

Re:new title (1)

leuk_he (194174) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244573)

revenge of the photo shoppers.

There are just pictures of the star wars kid [jedimaster.net] photo shopped/ 3d edited to death.

he will think twice of photoshopping after his bandthwidthh bill's come in.

Is it just me... (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244515)

Or is Chewbacca groping Leia?

Re:Is it just me... (3, Funny)

chunkwhite86 (593696) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244626)

Or is Chewbacca groping Leia?

Dude, he's totally grabbing her boob. Han is so going to be pissed when he hears about this.

Re:Is it just me... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244716)

She belongs to Han because...Han Shot First!!

Movies (2, Interesting)

Manan Shah (808049) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244517)

Most people agree that the first two movies were pretty much a disgrase to the fanchise. It seems Lucas has decided that special effects should be the focus of the story, instead of the story. The originals were groundbreaking in their look, but also magnificently told a story. The new movies lack that. With that said, the second one was slightly better than the abortion that was Episode 1. From early word, the new movie will be dark and full of action, and hopefully it will be worthy of the name Star Wars.

Re:Movies (2, Insightful)

mark-t (151149) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244559)

"disgrace to the franchise"?

Get real.

The movies are what created the franchise in the first place, and Lucas can take the movies _AND_ the franchise in whatever direction he wants.

I think what you mean is that the first two episodes are a disgrace to _YOUR_ impression of what Star Wars is supposed to be. But this isn't your movie, it's Lucas's. If you don't like it, don't watch it.

Re:Movies (-1, Troll)

robocrop (830352) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244728)

Yeah! And if Michaelangelo's grandson wants to cover the Sistene Chapel's ceiling with boobies, it's his right because he has the legal right to do it! You're just the paying customer, so shut your piehole and fork over the $$$$!

SHUT UP YOU FUCKING BABY!


Re:Movies (2, Insightful)

mark-t (151149) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244857)

Apples and oranges...

Your comparison might be a little more apt if it were Lucas's kids or some other person that were doing the newer movies, but it isn't... it's Lucas himself, the _SAME PERSON_ that invented Star Wars in the first place.

Fucking idiot, die. Analogies from an idiot! (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244861)

Hey, shit-for-brains!

Lucas is still Lucas, and it's his creation. It is not his son doing anything, it's LUCAS HIMSELF. Keep your lame retard analogies to yourself, idiot.

Now fuck off, you lame motherfucking piece of shit.

Re:Movies (3, Insightful)

AceCaseOR (594637) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244882)

And this, class, is a form of what we call a "strawman". You see, the grandparent post was referring to George Lucas having the right to make Star Wars movies how he wants. Parent, on the other hand, is putting forward a strawman (creating a position and attacking it), by putting forward the analogy of a the decendant of the creator of a work of art changing of a series his ancestor created. There is a difference.

Re:Movies (1)

MrFile (194025) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244812)

Sorry to disagree with YOUR imperssion of HIS imperssion but MY imperssion and many OTHER peoples imperssion match the original posters comments. The first movie was fairly bad, the second one better and the third.. well we will see wont we.

Re:Movies (1)

jcr (53032) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244564)

The originals were groundbreaking in their look, but also magnificently told a story.

Magnificently?

Now that I'm much older than when I first saw them, I've got to say that the first three star wars movies really don't hold up to repeated viewing.

-jcr

Re:Movies (1)

NATIK (836405) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244769)

I gotta disagree with you i have seen them many times, and i still think that they are by far the greatest movies made yet. I just think it sad how they afterwards have done everything they can to pump all the money the possibly can, out of the Star Wars name.

Re:Movies (4, Interesting)

colonslashslash (762464) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244790)

The original Star Wars movies are damn good movies, but I think alot of people here forget that when they were first released, they were children or teenagers.

I've said this before and got modded down for it, but screw it. The new Star Wars films aren't really geared towards children any less than the originals were. Sure, Jar Jar is a stupid and annoying character to watch, but C3P0 was also an irritating bastard in the first films, providing childish humour and no-brainer script to the movies.

As for everyone claiming they know they will be dissapointed by this movie, you will only be dissapointed if you go in thinking the movie is going to be a great film. If you know that it won't, they you won't be dissapointed.

Take the movies at face value. They are all certified for younger audiences, even the originals, therefore its pretty safe to assume alot of the content will not only be suitable for younger viewers, but also more enjoyable for them.

Yeah yeah..... mod me down as troll or flamebait just like every time I don't just spit out "Lucas is evil and has destroyed my life" on Star Wars related discussions :P

YAY! (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244522)

First Post!

I LOVE STAR WARS!

Re:YAY! (2)

nurb432 (527695) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244621)

Too bad the last 2 movies were not..

Not sure what they were, but they were not starwars.. They were garbage..

Really a shame, as they could have been great..

Found you! (5, Funny)

scarletbiro (789537) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244526)

Dude, what is Saruman doing there? I knew he didn't really die. You have to watch those slippery ones all the damn time.

Re:Found you! (5, Funny)

Rahga (13479) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244618)

Christopher Lee needs to make his own t-shirt line.....

"57 years in the movies and all I got was typecasting as Saruman."

At least he doesn't have it as baaaad mutha... uhm, I mean bad... as Samuel L. Jackson.

Re:Found you! (3, Funny)

bill_mcgonigle (4333) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244705)

"57 years in the movies and all I got was typecasting as Saruman."

I thought he got the job because Saruman is a contraction for Scaramanga. :)

I've got a better title for Episode III: (5, Insightful)

JoeLinux (20366) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244529)

"Episode III: The last chance for Lucas".

Seriously...is anyone going into this thing with high hopes? Episode I was like watching my childhood melt into easily-marketable claptrap, and Episode II felt like the actors had full-body botox.

Who is going to see this expecting a wonderful, rounded, well-acted movie? Don't get me wrong, I intend to see it, but mostly because of morbid curiosity.

I dunno...I guess I'm still bitter about LucasArts cancelling Sam and Max for more Star Wars Title. Damn them!

Re:I've got a better title for Episode III: (5, Funny)

E IS mC(Square) (721736) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244583)

It took Lucas 2-3 decades to achieve what Wachowski brothers achieved in 2-3 years - undoing of great movie-making for money!!

Re:I've got a better title for Episode III: (3, Insightful)

fr2asbury (462941) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244717)

Oh, I don't think I ever go to a Star Wars movie for a "well-acted" movie, even the original ones. But from what I've seen the eye candy in this up coming one looks like it'll succesfully make me go "Ooo" and that's the extent of my hopes and expectations. I think I will be pleased.

Re:I've got a better title for Episode III: (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244727)

Full-body botox?

You need glasses. Natalie Portman was Naked and Petrified in the movies.

Re:I've got a better title for Episode III: (5, Funny)

NormalVisual (565491) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244845)

Don't know about the movie, but I'm sure I will find Natalie Portman to be wonderful and rounded in Ep. III.

Re:I've got a better title for Episode III: (1)

AceCaseOR (594637) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244899)

I didn't know you had a thing for pregnant women (even if it's not-pregnant women posing as being pregnant).

i dont fear... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244537)

but maybe you should, for the slashdot hordes cometh, and few web servers are prepared to serve up that many pictures...

Aint it incorrect.. (5, Insightful)

Turn-X Alphonse (789240) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244546)

Personally after the HHGG (Zaphod's second head is up his nose) and Zeta Gundam (A real Gundam is being made for a movie! Here's some pictures which are infact a 1/2 scale Gundam model been around for 10 years!), incidents. I think I'll hold off on any "leaked" or "hot new news" untill it's been comfirmed by a source I trust.

Re:Aint it incorrect.. (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244572)

Like your mom?

Ba-da-bing!

yeah, as if... (1)

snig64 (793215) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244556)

anyone would want star wars pix. ;) Let's see here... Avy Scott... or Star Wars... tough choice.

lowered expectations (4, Insightful)

t1nman33 (248342) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244575)

Saw these pics this morning...they look good.

Which pretty much sums up my expectations: it looks neat from the previews, and probably will disappoint me in the end. I was in line at Blockbuster with my girlfriend the other night, looking at recent releases, and noting how many of them had excellent trailers, and how many of them actually turned out to be worth watching. Almost anything looks good when your interaction with it consists of a trailer, some stills, a few out-of-context quotes and maybe a rough plot.

I'll get my ticket, I'll see the movie, I'll be disappointed, and, you know, whatever. And so will you.

Re:lowered expectations (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244683)

<VADER>I find your lack of faith is disturbing</VADER>

Re:lowered expectations (4, Insightful)

dema (103780) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244851)

I'll get my ticket, I'll see the movie, I'll be disappointed, and, you know, whatever. And so will you.

I sure won't. I got my ticket, saw Episode I, was dissapointed, didn't buy the DVD, and haven't seen Episode II. If you don't want people like Lucas to pull crap like this, why do you pay to see movies you know won't live up to your expectations?

Re:lowered expectations (1)

singpolyma (454549) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244895)

I actually find that I like the movie better than I thought it would be from the trailer. I have watched many trailers and thought "Well that movie isn't going to be worth watching", and then watched it and it was pretty good. I do not find I am often disappointed by movies for which I have seen the trailers. They may pick the most exciting parts of the movie for the trailers, but often they have decent filler too, despite what you may have read on Movie A Minute [rinkworks.com].

http://www.idontfear.com/ (3, Funny)

Turn-X Alphonse (789240) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244580)

Okay lads, this guy is asking for it! With a URL like http://www.idontfear.com/ , surely he's mocking the slashdot effect. Bring out all your Amigas and C64s and we'll have his server linched by dawn!

Re:http://www.idontfear.com/ (2, Informative)

wwest4 (183559) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244763)

Joking aside, "I don't fear" was a supposed EP3 spoiler quote from one of the LFL production folks.

i'm holding out hope (1, Insightful)

aoasus (786460) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244582)

I'm really hoping that Lucas has listned to the critics and will make this one a lot less for the kiddies than the last two. He's really come to rely upon the whiz-bang way too much and left a lot of the storytelling out. The money has gone to his head and at this point it's less about the film itself and more about the marketing opportunites. What he fails to realize is that the average movie going audience is vastly different today than they were in the late 70's. I can see better special effects anywhere, but a compelling story? At least there are no photos of Jar-Jar.

The force isn't that strong in this server.... (0, Offtopic)

Jackson_Ash (571413) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244591)

Perhaps their domain name should be changed to 'idontfearanythingbutalinkonslashdot.com'.

JA

Typo in the headline (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244608)

Submitter misspelled "shit" as "sith". Please correct ASAP.

Google cache version (1, Informative)

nazgul000 (545727) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244619)

Google's cache of the site [64.233.161.104]...

Re:Google cache version (1)

larkost (79011) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244702)

How exactly is it helpful to link to the text-only cache of a site of images?

Re:Google cache version (2, Insightful)

SpaFF (18764) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244704)

Well that doesn't do us much good since the google cache doesn't include the pics...

Real pics? (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244638)

I'll be watchin to see if Chewie gets a nice handful of Leia.

RAWRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!

What the new movies are lacking... (4, Interesting)

Lorean (756656) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244647)

Anyone notice how the first three movies all had a good chunk of time allocate to space/ship battles? While the new movies have practically none? I hope those X-wing looking thngs are indicative of things to come. Though, I am disapointed at not seeing any Z-95s.

This (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244653)

Better not be a goatse

Disapointing (0, Offtopic)

blahbooboo (839709) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244655)

It's disapointing that someone posted an honest criticism of lucas' films, and he is labeled as flamebait.

Seriously, moderators try to be impartial and neutral. One can comment negatively on linux, mac, ipod, and star wars and be flameing.

Now to cover my butt from being called a flamer from the moderators: Linux rules, I love Mac, I love Ipods! MS sucks! :)

Slashdotted! Why are you guys clicking on the link (5, Interesting)

Xpilot (117961) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244667)

Seriously, Slashdot keeps trashing the prequels, saying you'll never see them coz they suck, yada yada yada... and yet that site got slashdotted quicker than lightspeed. Why do you even care? Do you genuinely dislike them, or s it just some kind of slashdot groupthink conformity that makes you bash something you don't have to see if you don't want to?

Now, I'm not defending George Lucas (I didn't think the prequels were great... nor did the acting make me want to care about any of the characters). But still, it wasn't horrible. I could still enjoy watching the story unfold into what we know happens in Episodes 4-6. It is backstory, but I admit I had fun discovering what happens to the galaxy as a whole before the empire. It's fun to know about the Jedi order in its heyday, talked about in the original trilogy.

But hey, this is Slashdot. Continue your bashing.

Re:Slashdotted! Why are you guys clicking on the l (1)

Tavor (845700) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244756)

Umm... I saw them just now. There is still some life in his server yet! Quickly, we must quash this!

Re:Slashdotted! Why are you guys clicking on the l (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244795)

I saw the first prequel and hated it. Of course, I never liked the original three star wars films that much, either. The story and plot are *very* basic and uninteresting, as are the characters. I can see how a bunch of dorky teens in 1977 and 1981 could have gotten caught up with it, but it's nothing special thirty years later.

It's just incredibly dull and lame. I started to watch the second prequel and gave up after a half hour. I was just bored to tears. I mean, I couldn't care any less about the characters or the plot of Star Wars even if they were replaced with characters directly from OC or some other inane pop culture show.

I think that Star Wars has become a "status symbol". It's to geeks what leet-speak is to script-kiddies. If you speak the language (leet-speak in one, star wars in the other) it makes you feel like and gives SOME people the impression that you belong in that culture and know what the hell you're talking about. Or, alternately, it's like people who stick a light-stick and a window in their PC and call themselves hard-core modders. Or people who have been on the internet "since way back in 1998" calling themselves "veterans" and "techies". Much in that same flavor.

For the rest of the clique, Star Wars is as uninteresting as an egg-drop script for an IRC channel is to a software developer who's writing his own OS.

Re:Slashdotted! Why are you guys clicking on the l (1)

NoTheory (580275) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244801)

Dude, just because the first two movies sucked horribly, doesn't mean that people aren't hoping that the third one doesn't suck. You've answered your own question, people don't genuinely dislike them (as can be seen by the comments and slashdotting), they're in fact more incensed because they feel let down. If you're not defending lucas, and you're interested (as everyone else is) in how epIII will tie into epIV, then why are you so hung up about people riding down the first pair of films?

Oh well, this is Slashdot. Continue your bitching.

Re:Slashdotted! Why are you guys clicking on the l (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244803)

Seriously, Slashdot keeps trashing the prequels, saying you'll never see them coz they suck, yada yada yada... and yet that site got slashdotted quicker than lightspeed. Why do you even care?
Slashdot is not a gestalt entity. The people who are visiting this photo site and are genuinely interested in the movies are not necessarily the same people who post comments to Slashdot. This is not a difficult concept.

Re:Slashdotted! Why are you guys clicking on the l (0, Flamebait)

That's Unpossible! (722232) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244805)

Seriously, Slashdot keeps trashing the prequels, saying you'll never see them coz they suck, yada yada yada... and yet that site got slashdotted quicker than lightspeed. Why do you even care? Do you genuinely dislike them, or s it just some kind of slashdot groupthink conformity that makes you bash something you don't have to see if you don't want to?

Holy fuck are you stupid. Sorry, you are. You are confusing the website, Slashdot, with the readers -- many of whom have differing opinions on EVERYTHING!

Re:Slashdotted! Why are you guys clicking on the l (2, Insightful)

AceCaseOR (594637) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244830)

True, but Star Wars-bashing (and especially prequel-bashing), tends to take a large volume of posts, and often gets modded up.

Re:Slashdotted! Why are you guys clicking on the l (3, Insightful)

east coast (590680) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244835)

Seriously, Slashdot keeps trashing the prequels, saying you'll never see them coz they suck, yada yada yada...

The Slashdot community is fairly large. The number of bashes vs. the number of people who keep quiet is really high. Not to say that every user of SD sits on either side of the fence but it's not what it appears to be. It's like the LA riots years ago; the news never reported that 18 million or so LA residents didn't riot. You only seen those who did.

and yet that site got slashdotted quicker than lightspeed.

I'm sure this access to the site isn't a slashdot only type of deal. These previews are going to cause a buzz elsewhere.

Do you genuinely dislike them, or s it just some kind of slashdot groupthink conformity that makes you bash something you don't have to see if you don't want to?

I personally don't like them, just my two cents. Why do you bash the bashers? You don't have to read our comments just as we don't have to see the new films. The door swings both ways.

Now, I'm not defending George Lucas

I think that defending Lucas at this point is even beyond the powers of the Jedi.

But hey, this is Slashdot. Continue your bashing.

Thanks for the permission.

Re:Slashdotted! Why are you guys clicking on the l (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244837)

That site has been slashdotted for the same reason so many people slow down to a crawl on the freeway to view a horrible, limb-twisting car wreck. But then, that's just my feeling about George Lucas films. YMMV.

Opening Scroll (1)

Darthmalt (775250) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244718)

A Long time ago in a galaxy far far away....

After the death of the Loyal representative from Naboo Jar Jar Binks,
the entire gungan race was wiped out by a Seperatist invasion of Naboo.

Just a PR Stunt (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244734)

Does anyone really believed such pictures leak out without the consent of the studio and producers? That anyone in production would risk his/her job my copying them and distributing them?

The SW III PR troups are gearing up, and these are the first PR shots. A few anonymous e-mails to a few fans running fan sites, and voila, lots of attention.

Re:Just a PR Stunt (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244785)

Why yes i think they would... Have you not seen the previous morons who have leaked the whole film weeks in advance? Wouldn't you want to make movie history by leaking pics of the most antispated movie of the year?

Re:Just a PR Stunt (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244820)

Leaking complete movies happens at other stages, by other people than production.

Re:Just a PR Stunt (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244823)

Since when did Star Wars need a publicity stunt to get people exited about it?

Re:Just a PR Stunt (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244876)

1 and 2 weren't that great. Many of the '70 fans were disapointed and grew up, while 1 and 2 didn't attract a new fan base. 3 is maybe the largest box office risk of the franchise, except maybe 4. But 4 was cheap compared to 3.

"No guarantees on accuracy..." (1)

jayhawk88 (160512) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244740)

When, oh when will someone be able to guarentee wild-ass internet rumors and fanciful speculations?

I'm confused about these pics (3, Informative)

adzoox (615327) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244742)

I posted this in my /. journal last night so I'll give you guys a crack at it:

I'm a big Star Wars fan ... not a nut, but a fan.

I didn't like the 1st prequel, although it wasn't as bad as many of the people on /. slice and dice it.

The Attack Of The Clones was pretty good. I would rank it with Jedi

The Revenge Of The Sith is shaping up to be pretty awesome looking. As many are putting it - this movie BETTER be good because it's the whole reason Episodes 4,5, and 6 were done. I think in a way, this proves that Lucas was right to do 4,5,6 rather than 1,2,3 first.

I have enjoyed seeing the story behind the story and the elaborate plot of the emporer to wage war to be able to wage war and slowly kill off the "good troops and jedi" to be able to control the weak and lord over the ruthless.

I am quite confused though about the new leaked images that have surfaced on the net.

http://www.idontfear.com/

I thought Palpatine WAS the emporer! And all along I thought it was Palpatine behind that hood when talking to Dooku and Darth Maul. The pictures would indicate otherwise, unless it is telling that the dark side in it's truest form transforms you into an ugly creature. Was Maul just a black guy? Then when he was consumed by the dark side - grow horns and intricate red tattoos? It seems this way. Either that - or the emporer is NOT Palpatine - maybe he is a clone? Maybe Palpatine is a clone of the emporer??

Why isn't Dooku all crazy creature fangy snarly?

I would also like for it to be explained how Anakin looks like he does in Episodes 5 and 6 (behind shot in 5, full head shot in 6) - because if he was consumed by the dark side - where is his evil look?

The only hint, so far, that I have seen is in the teaser trailer - Anakin (Hayden Christenson) turns around and his eyes are yellow.

Re:I'm confused about these pics (1)

bje2 (533276) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244799)

you were right before...Palpatine = Emporer...that's why he's Emporer Palpatine in 4,5,6...

Re:I'm confused about these pics (1)

FXSTD (468083) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244894)

One of those "black arts" jedi aren't supposed to use.....

Perhaps they use the force to alter or mask their looks making it easier to blend in or to look mean and evil for intimidation - which begs the question - which is their true form/identity?

Re:I'm confused about these pics (2, Funny)

nagora (177841) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244917)

Why isn't Dooku all crazy creature fangy snarly?

Man, he's Dracula! What more do you want?

TWW

Nerd Tidal Wave (1)

bgumm (661507) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244777)

I wish I could see the virtual tidal wave of traffic hurtling toward that site. It would be a terrifying sight to behold...

It's a good thing they got slashdotted... (1)

slungsolow (722380) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244779)

Cuz in reality they stole the spoiler images from another site (which is mentioned in the AICN article).

In related movie spoiler news, I think its time that someone 'leaked' the Jessica Simspon as Daisy Duke images on slashdot. I would, except I like my bandwidth bill just the way it is.

"Aint It Cool" and Star Wars in the same sentence (0, Flamebait)

dfn5 (524972) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244809)

What's wrong with this picture.

Harry Knowles is a Media Whore (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244836)

As always with leaked pics, no guarantees on accuracy.

Shouldn't this read:

As always with AICN, no guarantees on accuracy.

is it gonna suck? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 9 years ago | (#11244855)

fair enough, Phantom Menace was complete garbage, AotC was rather better, but happily for us, Lucas has trapped himself in a position where the film cannot possibly have a happy ending.

The republic falls, the bright young hope of the jedi turns into Space Hitler and enslaves the galaxy, so with luck there shouldn't be a whole lot of room for Jar-Jar-sodding-Binks and dancing Ewoks, what with all the fighting that'll be going on....

The real revenge of the Sith (1)

sphealey (2855) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244889)

The real revenge of the Sith would be for noone, and I mean not a single person, to go see that movie when it is released.

sPh

A bit about some of new stuff (2, Informative)

nomadicpuma (809691) | more than 9 years ago | (#11244911)

General Grievous: http://www.starwars.com/databank/character/general grievous/ If you haven't seen the cartoon series that ran on Cartoon Network a bit ago, he's the jedi-killing droid. Judging by the site, it seems he'll be the main baddie in Episode III. As for the 6-winged X-Wings, I was a bit suprised - I thought they'd show Headhunters (2-winged), which, according to the books, are the proto-X-Wings.
Load More Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...